Slashdot Mirror
Control of the .ORG TLD
rhwalker22 writes "TechNews.com has an in-depth look at the 11 groups bidding to run dot-org when VeriSign gives it up later this year." I have a sneaking suspicion that my bid of $100 and a case of guinness has been outdone.
Sarah the checkout girl!!
hi ac..just wanted to dedicate this to u again. haha ok ok, u can all mark me down now.
FP!!! FP!!! um...er...now what?
That tech support that does not kill me...drives me crazier
org this
a
a
b
b
c
c
d
d
d
d
I claim this fp for me, not CLiT.
Thought I had first post
But some jerk beat me to it.
I am filled with shame.
This is what is annoying about people controlling TLDs. What if "figurativly" some communist leader controls the .org tld? all the old .orgs are deleted and then only people supporting communism are allowed .org domains? grrr.
"Martha Stewart can lick my Scrotum......do i have a scrotum?" -- Sharon Osbourne
Running an orgy however is! Yeah, baby!
i don't want to have to change my bookmarks to slashdot.orgy
MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
from the insert-group-sex-joke-here dept.
Y?
Just out of curiosity, how does this affect my domain?
And the l33t shall inherit the 34r7h.
.... and raise you Celine Dion.
(I'm in canada, we don't want her)
The way this ought to work is with the database is distributed and replicated across all the registrars, with a majority-voting system for forcing consistency. That would eliminate any single point of failure. .ORG would be a good place to deploy such a technology, so that when .COM comes up for renewal, we can get rid of the current single point of control.
And for those who don't think that this might affect them in the slightest, look at the current webpage in your location bar.
Oh yea... and no prizes for guessing whos gonna win... since dot-com is dot-gone... I guess .org will be going to dot-morgue...
PAranoia Rules!!My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
they could register B.ORG
sulli
RTFJ.
Don't worry taco, VA LNUX will be bankrupt soon enough, and you won't need to worry about slahdot.org
oh man, mod this up! really come on, most first posts are trolls or annoying but this i laughed my ass off at this
--fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
You MUST be financed by a corporation to outdo my bid of $50 and a case of Miller High Life.
I had this dream last night where I worked for Wendy's, but it was on a reality TV show, and they would dunk you in hot grease if you were a bad worker. That ever happen to anyone?
Liberate your mind in two clicks or less.
That will describe the sound you make when your site's been slashdotted.
Sale of a root domain is a bad precedent. How long till .NET comes up for sale?
As one of the official supplicants, I naturally read the profiles (and even read the full proposals). So, it was with some bemusement that I noted a continued strain of ".org has to go to a for-profit registry provider because that is the only way the system will be stable."
We posted a few choice words on this subject. The "trust us because we're a .com and will run a stable argument" argument just doesn't wash.
Carl Malamud
Internet Muticasting Service
"Dot-org is important now because it the one space on the Internet that ... has been devoted to noncommercial speech," said Barry Steinhardt, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Technology and Liberty Program. "If it were to be turned into just another dot-com, that would be a blow to speech." (emphasis mine)
[cheapshot]
mpaa.org?
riaa.org?
What is 'noncommercial' about that? I guest we can chalk up another 'blow to speech' by the corporations that RUN mpaa and riaa.
[/cheapshot]
-- My HARDWARE, My CHOICE.
ROFLFOLFOLOLOLOLROLFOLFOL
h ah rhaharharhahahhahahahhh....
ahhahaahahahhahahhahhahhrhrahhhahrahhhahahahhar
not even remotely funny.
I'm sorry, but nothing is more valuable than a case of Guinness :)
"All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"
Slashdot and other OSDN sites are considered profitable, right? Owned by publically traded VA Software.
So will slashdot.org become slashdot.com?
Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
DOt-oRg d3c15ION lOOM5 l4r9E Ph0R N0nC0MMErC14L 5Pe@k3R5
... H45 8e3n Dev0T3D t0 noNc0mmERCI@l $P33cH," $41d B@rRy 5+31nh@rDt, +H3 DiR3c+0R opH +eH 4Meric@n cIV1L li8Ert135 UnION'$ T3CHnolOgy 4Nd L1BeRtY Pro9r4m. "1PH 1T w3RE +O 83 tURn3D 1nTO juS+ @N0+hEr d0t-cOM, tHa+ w0Uld b3 4 BLOw +o 5PEech."
8Y D@VId MC9U1r3
w4SHInG+0NPo5T.com $+@PhPh WRI+eR
mOnD4Y, juLy 29, 2002; 12:00 @m
1n tHe 1nT3RnE+ 4+L45, "d0t-oR9" shoW5 up 4$ a sTUfpHy Un1V3R$1ty t0WN 0n +HE 0UT5KIR+5 oPh TH3 C0mm3rc3-s+3ePed "DO+-c0M" MeCca. 8ut 45 tH3 ONLY pL@C3 oN tH3 1nt3Rne+ d3V0+eD t0 N0nCoMm3rCi@l 5p3eCH, do+-0R9 1S 1ndI5peN$a8Le tO C0N5umeR ADv0c@teS, PU8L1C iN+eRe5+ 9r0Up5 and pOli+1C4L DI5$1deN+5, MaNY 0pH wh0M 4r3 W4+CHiN9 ClOS3ly +0 5e3 Wh0 WiLL be ChO$3n +o T4k3 t3H h3LM 0PH +HE DoM@1n When T3h CurRent Re91$trY 0PEr4T0R G1v35 UP It$ r0LE L@T3r +h1$ YE4r.
"D0t-0Rg 15 1mPOrT4n+ NOw 8ec4U53 It Th3 oN3 $pAce on TeH 1nTerNet +h@+
0P3r4+3d F0r yE4R$ 8Y 1N+3rnet @dDr3551n9 g1Ant VERiS19N 1nc., d0T-oR9 1$ 5l@+3D t0 93+ 4 n3w L@nDl0rd 1n octo83R WH3n v3R1$i9n rELINkW15he5 1T5 HOld ON t3h d0M41n.
eL3VEn eNtI+I3S, bO+H C0mm3rC1@L 4nD NONPR0fI+, h@v3 4pPL13D +0 OP3r4t3 do+-0Rg, 4ND gL0B@L 1Nt3rN3+ 4Ddre55iNG 4uthoR1t13$ 4r3 NoW 5l09GInG +HRouGh HUnDr3d5 0Ph paGE5 0f @PpLIc4tIon doCument$ in $3arCh 0f A WINnin9 B1DD3R.
iN1+14LLY, OFPH1c14L5 4+ +3H 1Nt3rn3+ CoRpOR@+1oN phor 45519N3d N4m35 4Nd nuM8er5 (IC4nN) oNLy pL4nN3d t0 4CCEPt B1D5 fROm noNprof1+ GRoUp$, BUt tH3y L@+3R D3C1Ded +0 +hR0w +eh cONtr@C+ Open +O @LL COMer5 IN 4n ephpHoR+ TO g4RnEr @$ M4ny Kw4liFI3D 8idS @5 P05$i8LE.
AL+HoU9H oP3N T0 4Ll iNt3Rnet u5er5, Do+-org ReM41n5 L@rg3ly 45$0c14+Ed wi+H Th3 N0nPROfIt OR94NIZ@TIoNS FOr wh1ch i+ 1s n4mEd. M@ny WItHIn +HE n0NpROpH1T CoMmUnITy @RE cLO$eLY Ph0Ll0W1n9 +H3 b1DD1ng PR0C355, h0ping +0 3n$uRe +h@T TeH D0m@IN r3M4iN$ PR1m4R1LY 4 Ph0rUm FoR NoN-CORpoR4+3 VOiC35.
"THeRe'$ L0T5 oPh c0mM3rcE 0n +h3 1n+Ernet," ceNt3r foR d3MoCRacY @ND +3CHN0LO9y (cD+) p0L1cY 4naLY5t r0b C0uRTn3Y $41D. "tHe 1NterNET i5 nO+ ONLy @BOU+ c0MMerCe. thErE 4LW@y$ NEeD$ t0 8E 5p4Ce Ph0r NONC0Mm3Rci4l COmm3nt anD 3xprE$5IOn."
Do+-Org R3PrES3n+$ 4 lucR4t1V3 4s$e+ pH0R wH1ch3v3R 0rG4niz@+10n +4k35 tHE r31n5 OpH t3h domaIn. 4S tH3 WhOl3$@le $eLL3R OpH d0t-0R9 n4ME5, +3h CuRreNt reG15try OperA+0R, V3ri$igN, M@K35 $6 @ YE@R ph0R 3v3Ry dO+-0rg N@me r39I$+Er3D.
W1+H m0Re +H4N 2.3 m1lLi0N RE915+r4ti0n5 4LRE4dY 1N Pl4C3, D0t-ORG W1ll pROv1d3 1+5 0pER4+Or WI+h 4 Pr3dIcT48lE rev3NUe 5Tr3am 1n 4n 0Ph+EN-5h@KY 1N+ERNe+ 3nV1R0nM3N+.
1c4nn won'+ 9iv3 pr3FerENCE to N0nPR0pHi+ 8IDDers. +H3 f1Rs+ pRI0RIty, 1c@nN pR351DEn+ STu4R+ LYNN 541d, 1$ f1ndING 4 5+@8lE 0PEr4tor T0 R3pl@ce v3R151GN.
"I D0N'+ BEl1ev3 +3h (1c@nN) BO4RD W0UlD f@V0r @ DeCI5iON +0 jeOP4rDIze +3h 5t4bil1Ty 0F doT-0R9, $O TH4T 83cOM35 @ VeRy Prim@ry Cr1+3R1@," LYNn $41d. "1c4nN'$ f1rsT prior1+Y 1$ +0 PRE5Erve t3h 5t4biLiTy @nd rEliA8IL1+y OF Th3 1N+3rne+ AnD +H3 dn5."
The IMS is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit run by Carl Malamud, who was responsible for getting the SEC's EDGAR filings freely available online. There is more info here.
83chrise.nuf
why all this reference to dogooders, & their pathetic plans to do good? their very existence is an affroNT to the ubridled fear based ?pr? fueooled greed/selfishness that the US has become infamouse four. why bother even being on the 'net, if you're not planning some kind of stock markup FraUD, for which you knead a good .con/~spirator, & some shyterious lawyers.
dumbass one-liners
Didn't they take that off the market after a bunch of hillbillies went blind?
"A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
My first order of business if I got .org will be to kick all of the for-profit businesses off of it. Whoops, sorry slashdot.org!
ICANN should not be deciding who controls .ORG. They are greedy corporate fucks who just want to make as much money as possible and benefit their corporate buddies. Does anyone really think that there's a chance in hell that ICANN will "award" .ORG to a non-profit organization? No. Its going to go to the corporate interests which can benefit ICANN the most.
.org should vote on what organization they want to run the .ORG domains. This way, we have a better chance that whatever organization that controls it will serve the interests of the public, not some corporations interests.
What SHOULD happen is that all the current owners of a
social sciences can never use experience to verify their statemen
They can re-register under the .reorg TLD.
~N
I guess nobody had the forethought to do a whois on microsoft.org ...
Well, here it is, the important stuff anyways.
Domain Name: MICROSOFT.ORG
Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.
Whois Server: whois.networksolutions.com
Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Name Server: DNS4.CP.MSFT.NET
Name Server: DNS5.CP.MSFT.NET
Updated Date: 21-feb-2002
>>> Last update of whois database: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 04:44:27 EDT
(trim)
Registrant:
Microsoft Corporation (MICROSOFT79-DOM)
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
US
Domain Name: MICROSOFT.ORG
Administrative Contact:
Gudmundson, Carolyn (CG6635) domains@MICROSOFT.COM Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
US
+1 (425) 882-8080 +1 (425) 936-7329
Technical Contact:
MSN NOC (MN5-ORG) msnnoc@MICROSOFT.COM
Microsoft Corp
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
US
425 882 8080
Fax- PATH
Record expires on 30-Apr-2003.
Record created on 30-Apr-2000.
Database last updated on 29-Jul-2002 14:20:27 EDT.
Domain servers in listed order:
DNS4.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.11
DNS5.CP.MSFT.NET 207.46.138.12
You (and I) may not agree with them, and a lot of other non-profit organizations, but that's the nature of organizations--they usually reflect the views of the members.
The IRA remains an anti-democratic militia which refuses to express the slightest humility over its murderous past
By Fergal Keane
18 May 2002
I used to spend a lot of time in Adare as a young reporter. There was a weekly district court sitting which required the attendance of the cub from The Limerick Leader. It was also a village of pleasant pubs. Adare is a pretty village with a beautiful old abbey, and one of the country's best hotels, the Dunraven Arms. I liked the town so much I got married there 16 years ago. It was also the place where men claiming to fight for Irish freedom murdered an Irish policeman six years ago. Garda Jerry McCabe was escorting a post office van travelling to Adare on the gloriously sunny morning of 7 June 1996. As the van pulled up outside the post office in Adare an IRA gang rammed the police escort vehicle.
The gunmen - who did not come from the village - fired into the police car, killing Jerry McCabe. Jerry was 52 years old and had five children. He was a good cop and a great father. Twenty thousand people queued up to sign a book of condolences, and the killers were widely denounced. The gunmen were members of the IRA, and the Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams would later call for their release from prison. He couldn't understand why murderers in the North could be released under the Good Friday Agreement, but the butchers down south had to stay in jail. There was an obvious contradiction. Irish politicians could endorse the release of men who had brought hell to the lives of RUC families, but in their own jurisdiction there were different moral standards.
But now it looks as if the people of several constituencies in the Republic, including North Kerry, which is next door to the village where Jerry McCabe was murdered, will vote for the IRA's political ally. The so-called "Castlerea Five" - the name given to the fascists who murdered Jerry McCabe - will still languish in prison, but in the spirit of forgiving and forgetting a substantial number of Irish people will vote Sinn Fein in this general election.
The polls suggest that Sinn Fein could win between three and seven seats. What is there to say, except that we seem to have very short memories. That and the fact that Sinn Fein have carefully targeted those who feel left out of the "Celtic Tiger" boom: the traditional support of the Irish Labour party in poor urban areas is being lured away. The new-look Sinn Fein focuses on issues such as health care and crime - no less of a public obsession in Ireland than in Britain or France. They are self-declared leftists, but benefit from the same disillusionment which has fed support for right-wing radicals across Europe. Critically, they are not seen as being "of the system".
Nowthe political party that supported the killers of Jerry McCabe is about to win a seat in North Kerry.
To get from Adare to the headquarters of the Sinn Fein campaign in the neighbouring constituency is a quick jaunt along one of the loveliest roads in Ireland. Not half as quick, though, as Sinn Fein's journey from being cheerleaders for the IRA to potential king-makers in a hung parliament.
The candidate in North Kerry is Martin Ferris, a close associate of Gerry Adams. Mr Ferris was named in two parliaments as a member of the IRA Army Council. It is also the constituency where my father was born, and where my family still lives. Mr Ferris's supporters would point out that many families in the area, including my own, had members who joined the Irish Republican Army and took up arms against British rule in 1919/22.
They would also say that IRA men opposed to the peace treaty with Britain turned their guns on other Irishmen, including soldiers and policemen, but after military defeat were allowed to enter constitutional politics. Indeed the Fianna Fail party of Bertie Ahern, now heading for victory in the elections, was born of men and women who fought against the forces of the Irish state. What is the difference between then and now, what makes Martin Ferris any different from Eamon De Valera? Mr Adams and his supporters would wish us to believe that there is no difference at all.
Except that there is a big difference really. Mr De Valera formed a political party that was not beholden to a secret military organisation. Forget the old joke about early Fianna Fail being a "slightly" constitutional party. There was no question of Mr De Valera keeping a private army on the go while he played politics in the Dail. But the Provisional IRA is very much intact. It may have started decommissioning but in all important respects it remains an anti-democratic, ultra-nationalist militia which arrogantly refuses to express the slightest humility over its murderous past.
Far from it. It is still a busy organisation. While there is mischief-making propaganda by elements of the British security establishment who have never liked the idea of a peace deal with Sinn Fein, only the blind or cynical could ignore the continued existence of a military movement.
As for saying sorry for the brutality it inflicted on the people of Ireland and Britain, you can forget it. Instead the IRA gives us the long whine, and the arrogance of men who know they are tougher and more ruthless than the constitutional politicians.
I have no trouble giving Gerry Adams credit for his bravery in negotiating an IRA ceasefire. I also accept that Sinn Fein must be part of the political process north and south of the border. When opponents of the peace process wanted Sinn Fein thrown out of talks because of IRA punishment beatings, I argued against them, and was condemned as "soft" by some commentators in the Republic.
But what I will not do is thank the IRA for being kind enough to stop murdering people. There can be no gratitude or respect for the killers of Jerry McCabe or Gillian Johnston. Gillian Johnston? That name is not mentioned on Irish doorsteps when the Sinn Fein boys come calling for votes. It is one of the forgotten names. Gillian was murdered by an IRA gang that was closer in spirit to Arkan's Tigers than to any idea of freedom fighters.
I remember her funeral in an old churchyard in the Fermanagh lake lands and the broken,bewildered country people filing out into the sunshine. Gillian was sitting in a car eating chips with her boyfriend when her killers apparently mistook her for an off-duty soldier. I long to hear the gunmen responsible for that butchery tell us what it was like to look down the sights and open fire.
Bertie Ahern has said there is no question of Sinn Fein joining any government. I couldn't agree more. There should be no Sinn Fein cabinet minister in the Republic until the IRA has disbanded. There is no justification for the IRA's continued existence, unless of course the whole peace business is merely part of a strategy in which armed rebellion has not been entirely discarded, something to be kept on the shelf in case circumstances demand a few bangs and blasts. If the republican movement is really sincere about peace, the IRA should disband now. I am too barnacled with scepticism to expect any apologies from the Provos, but a farewell to arms would suffice for now.
What is it, exactly, that makes this guy think .org has some lockout on commercial entities? If anything, the tendency for nonprofits to gravitate there seems like a popular custom more than a rule.
I own two .org domains. I don't have any plans to make any money off them ... but why shouldn't I?
Breakfast served all day!
Are you sure that's a raise?
What's the Guiness/Celine exchange rate today? The market is very volatile!
Hey, I always wanted to have J.ORG which is my first name. Too bad you cannot get one letter domains, as far as I know. :-)
It's okay, I have jawtheshark.net, jawtheshark.org and jawtheshark.com and also a ${MYLASTNAME}.lu domain. The last one is expensive, but the other three only cost me 12 Euro per year at Gandi Not that there is anything interesting to see on my sites...Just vanity
Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
as this article clearly points out, the organization required to set up a decent orgy often winds up being not worth the effort of even trying.
--- What
...and will need to "evaluate" your proposal. Please send the case of Guiness to my house, post haste. ;-)
I like lots of people. That doesn't mean I go carting them around the galaxy with me. --Dr. Who
Funny how Molson is suing for control of the canadian.biz domain(as if a beer company could have intellectual property rights to the name of our country and yet:
.Org Foundation" and the other "The DotOrg Foundation" can both be bidding for the same contract at the same time without litigation.
Two foundations, one called "The
Nice to see a sign of maturity in this overly-litigous world.
lysergically yours
Come on now, be honest - you're among friends.
You never made it past the front hall closet, and everyone knows it, mister thirty seconds!
does this mean verisign wont be spamming me to renew my domain with them anymore? oh wait, who am I kidding?
"I am now telling the computer EXACTLY what it could do with a lifetime supply of chocolate!"
-dB
"It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
I was going to bid, but I only had $34,000.
-russ
Don't piss off The Angry Economist
The way this ought to work is with the database is distributed and replicated across all the registrars, with a majority-voting system for forcing consistency. That would eliminate any single point of failure.
.org is currently available and assigning it (thus making it unavailable) is an atomic action. Ways to reliably distribute such actions non-hierarchically across cooperating systems have not been found.
.ORG would be a good place to deploy such a technology, so that when .COM comes up for renewal, we can get rid of the current single point of control.
Unfortunately that gets you into the "distributed update problem" which is unsolved (and may be insoluble).
Determining that
(It's not like nobody is working on this problem. It's the same as making a withdrawal from an account, but only if there's money to cover it. So there's big money to be made by getting it right on a no-single-point-of-failure distributed system. It's also the same as determining what constitutes the canonical "latest published" edition of a document - or piece of software - that is subject to revision. So hypertexties, computer scientists, and other academics have been beating their heads against it for years, too.)
The only practical solutions to date have been to have a designated system be the canonical decision-maker - and thus the authority on who is and who is not registered. This makes the operator of that system both the authority on who is and who is not registered, and the maintainer of the one canonical list (which is downloaded onto the other servers).
You can subdivide the namespace and have a multiplicity of "authorities", each with their own "turf". But this creates a hierarchy, starting with one particular authority who maintains the "root of the world" first level of division of the namespace. But that's what we have now.
Right. And if anybody solves the hard problem it will give us a testing ground that only has problems for non-profits, not for businesses that can lose megabux if they're down for a day, if bugs show up. B-)
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Isn't this just the Byzantine agreement problem, which is solved?
The end result is that they can only compete on price down to $6 before they start losing money. What's to stop VeriSign from charging $20 per wholesale domain name from each registrar? In other words, there really is no competition within the dot-org TLD. Sure, whoever runs the dot-info TLD can try to compete on price, but that's why people are clammoring for hundreds if not thousands of TLDs.
A dot-com domain name is valuable simply because there are only a few alternatives. If there were thousands of alternatives for foo.*, foo.com wouldn't be that much more valuable than foo.bar. The problem is that many TLDs are more valuable (dot-tv, dot-com, dot-xxx) because DNS continues to be used as a keyword system.
Is there any way out of this mess?
Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
Comment removed based on user account deletion
...is the sound of Jon Postel spinning in his grave.
My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
To lay my cards on the table, I've had a ".org" domain registered for more than a decade now, years before Dupont registered all their trademarks as domains in a single day, and forced us to go to a pay-for-domain system. I've defended my domain through several shady attempts to take it over (the last one being non-notification of renewal being required).
The "Commercial vs. non-commercial" argument is nothing but a bunch of BS.
The reason the ".com" domain is "used up" has to do with the fact that Netscape initially started doing automatic URL completion using ".com" as the default suffix, and Internet Explorer has since followed suit.
The result is that the ".com" is a defacto keyword index mechanism built into almost all URL input fields. So it's about controlling a particular keyword.
The fight over ".org" is the same as the fight over ".info" and ".biz"... trademark defense.
Almost anyone who owns a trademark feels that they must "grab it" in all possible domain suffixes to "defend" it. And this means money to anyone who controls a top level domain.
This is the business model of all the people trying to push ".biz" and ".info" domains onto currently registered ".com" domain owners.
They effectively get a "commission override" (currently $6) of every domain registration in the top level domain. Just like, no matter who you register a ".com" domain with these days, VeriSign gets $6 from you.
This is the business model of every company trying to obtain control of any top level domain.
I wish ".tm" didn't belong to a country; it would be a perfect place to put jerks who think that there is only one namespace in the world, the trademark namespace.
What we really need is a ".rtm" ("Registered Trademark") or even ".trademark" top level domain, and an agreement from legislators that that's all that's necessary to defend your trademark in the domain name space.
Of course, right now... that's ".com", isn't it? And it's not going to change until the default name completion rules for browsers change to embrace some new top level domain.
PS: Just to throw jet fuel on this fire... I'm *really* surprised that there isn't a ".aol" top level domain, into which all AOL "keywords" are registered, and all AOL controlled browsers complete to, by default...
-- Terry
Isn't America great? Where else can a complete idiot be elected president, destroy civil rights, and be hailed as a defender of freedom?
When all else fails, run.
I found this little chart on the side of the article rather interesting and thought I would pass it along for those that missed it. _____Domain Registrations_____ Largest Internet Domains, By Total Registrations .com 21,351,928 .de (Germany) 5,646,997 .net 3,623,412 .uk (Britain) 3,572,603 .org 2,329,726
Sources: SnapNames, Nominet UK, DENIC.de
Note: SnapNames numbers represent registrations through May
I had no idea that .de was almost the size of .net and .org combined!
I found this little chart on the side of the article rather interesting and thought I would pass it along for those that missed it.
.com 21,351,928
.de (Germany) 5,646,997
.net 3,623,412
.uk (Britain) 3,572,603
.org 2,329,726
.de was almost the size of .net and .org combined!
_____Domain Registrations_____
Largest Internet Domains, By Total Registrations
Sources: SnapNames, Nominet UK, DENIC.de
Note: SnapNames numbers represent registrations through May
I had no idea that
Oh come on. Guinness not on tap is bad anyway. At least go for a keg of guinness. Keep your $100. I'd sell my soul for that keg alone.
Apparently it didn't. A quick Google came up with this info on foo and foobar.
In short, "it now seems more likely that FUBAR was itself a derivative of `foo' perhaps influenced by German `furchtbar' (terrible) - `foobar' may actually have been the original form." "Foo" seems to have a pre-war history, its "earliest documented uses were in the 'Smokey Stover' comic strip published from about 1930 to about 1952."
Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
I have a sneaking suspicion that my bid of $100 and a case of guinness has been outdone.
I know for a fact that it has, by my bid of a case of Molsen Golden, $.37 and a broken EtherExpress NIC.
I'm sorry, I know the summary says this is an 'in-depth look at the 11 applicants', but the article is neither in-depth, nor does it list even ONE applicant.
MPAA and RIAA are not selling anything, just advocating viewpoints of their members (who are commercial).
What I find more disconcerting is the raft of 'nonprofit but with commercial partners' type of applications - which seem to be just a non-profit front for commercial operations. For example, the DotOrg Foundation have already agreed to outsource all the work to register.com at $5.20/domain, and then charge Joe Public $6. Why not let register.com put in an application themselves? (To answer that myself, they have put in their own application as 'Register Organisation Inc.'). Similarly 'UIA' seems to be just a front for Verisign.
These semi-non-profit organisations then seem to have bizarre ideas about what to do with all the filthy lucre they accumulate: from giving a fraction of it to good causes (justifying overcharging by donating a tenth of their profits to charity), to using the money to develop tools which they will then sell to .org registrants (WTF?).
I would personally prefer a proper (open) non-profit organisation to run it, but wouldn't mind an accountable for-profit company. Having an open, non-profit, well-run shell organisation who shovel all the money into some shadowy forprofit partner seems a recipe for disaster.
Incidentally, the most amusing(worrying?) application seems to be the '.Org foundation' who claim "We want to make sure that [dot-org] is representative of the larger world and not just representative of U.S. organizations," - and follow this up by: 'Microsoft has tentatively agreed to help fund The .Org Foundation if it wins the contract, Rogers said. Details of that arrangement are still being worked out.'
Now I suppose I can look forward to a nice Christmas present from whoever takes over the .org TLD: a notice telling me that the two domains I registered back in June are no longer valid and that they're no longer available unless I get out my checkbook again (six months early) but that, sorry, one of them has already been assigned to some group because one of their members blurted it out during a brainstorming session and now they claim IP rights to it.
The standard approach is to say that a quorum is required - say Q sites out of N, where Q > N/2. It's still quite painful to actually implement distributed and replicated databases (they were all the rage in the 80s and early 90s but never really took off), but it should be possible, particularly if a human is available to resolve occasional update conflicts.
Each site should be able to determine independently if it is part of a quorum, even in the event of network partitions (Internet breaks connectivity between two subsets of the sites). So I don't see this as a big problem, although other problems certainly exist.
There are still interesting issues with two-phase commit, where the transaction coordinator (which collects all the 'ready' responses and makes an atomic decision to proceed) is a single point of failure, but I think Transarc (taken over by IBM) may have done something in this area by moving this to a more reliable server.
Perhaps someone with more recent involvement in distributed DBs can comment.