Slashdot Mirror


Tracking Hackers

Anton Chuvakin submitted this review of Lance Spitzner's Honeypots: Tracking Hackers. Spitzner has previously contributed to a book and many online documents about the Honeynet Project. Chuvakin starts off, "If you liked "Know Your Enemy" by the Honeynet Project, you will undoubtedly like Lance Spitzner's (the Honeynet Project founder) new book "Tracking Hackers" much more. In fact, even if you did not quite like "Know Your Enemy", you will likely be deeply impressed with the new book on honeypots and their use for tracking hackers." "Honeypots: Tracking Hackers" author Lance Spitzner pages 480 publisher AWL rating 5/5 reviewer Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D, GCIA ISBN 0321108957 summary using honeypots to track electronic intruders

The structure of the book is different from the "Know Your Enemy": Lance starts from the very beginning - namely, his first honeypot penetration experience and then goes on to talk about all aspects of honeypots. In-depth and structured background on honeypot technology is provided. Honeypots are sorted by the level of interaction with attacker they are able to provide.

In addition, the book covers the business benefits of using honeypots. By classifying the value of honeypots into prevention, detection and response (exactly as done in Honeynet Project white papers) Lance Spitzner analyzes the honeypot technology contributions to an overall security posture. Also, the book describes the differences between the research and production honeypots and demonstrates the benefits of both for various deployment scenarios.

A good part of the book is devoted to particular honeypot solutions: 'honeyd' by Niels Provos and several commercial honeypots with detailed explanation of how they work. For example, there is a clear description of ARP spoofing and how it is used by the 'honeyd' honeypot daemon. An interesting chapter on "homegrown" honeypot solutions (such as the ones used to capture popular worms of 2001) sheds some light on the simplest honeypots that can be built for specific purposes, such as to capture a popular attack by means of a simple port listener. Use of UNIX chroot() jail environment for honeypots is also analyzed.

Of course, a special chapter is devoted to honeynets - Project's primary weapon in a war against malicious hackers. The Generation II (GenII) honeynet technology is first introduced in a book. The chapter not only lists honeynet deployment and maintenance suggestions, but also talks about the risks of honeynets.

Another great feature of the book is a chapter on honeypot implementation strategies and methods, such as using NAT to forward traffic to a honeypot and DMZ honeypot installation. The information is then further demonstrated using the two full honeypot case studies, from planning to operation.

What is even more important, maintaining the honeypot architecture is covered in a separate chapter. Honeypots are a challenge to run, mainly since no 'lock it down and maintain state' is possible. One has to constantly build defenses and hide and dodge attacks that cannot be defended against.

"Tracking hackers" also has a "Legal Issues" chapter, written with a lot of feedback from the DoJ official. It dispels some of the misconceptions about the honeypots such as the "entrapment" issue, summarizes wiretap laws and related data capture problems.

The book describes an almost cutting edge of the honeypot research and technology. To truly get the cutting edge and to know about the Honeynet Project latest activities in detail, wait for the second edition of "Know Your Enemy" (coming out next year). In "Tracking Hackers" Lance makes some predictions about honeypots in "Future of Honeypots" chapter. Honeypot-based early warning system and distributed deployments, analysis of new threats and expanding research applications, making honeypots easier to deploy and maintain are all in this chapter.

To conclude, Marcus Ranum's enthusiastic preface is not an overstatement, it is indeed a great book for both security professionals and others interested in this exciting technology. While I was already familiar with most of the information in the book, it was a fascinating read! This is the kind of book you don't want or even cannot put down until the last page is turned.

Anton Chuvakin, Ph.D., GCIA (http://www.chuvakin.org) is a Senior Security Analyst with a major security company.

You can purchase Honeypots: Tracking Hackers from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

87 comments

  1. Use of honeypots by TrueKonrads · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand why everybody suddenly wants to have a honeypot? You are not a fed and you won't mail them "Look there is a ssh scanner poking my network, go arrest them, oh brave ones". Stick to snort with decent rulesets and be set. Add kernel patches and protect your butt from exploits. Honeypots seem to be overhyped.

    --
    Lone Gunmen crew.
    1. Re:Use of honeypots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not only that, but imagine the time (read: money) and money spent on a honeynet, and watching a honeynet versus actually paying for better security software/people.

      Unless you are in the security software biz, honeynets are a complete waste of money.

    2. Re:Use of honeypots by Hayzeus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Good point. I suppose a honeypot might be a useful tool for organizations like banks and other places that might be targets for organized attempts at breakins-for-profit. In such a situation, a honeypot might provide both a good early warning system and keep the intruders around long enough for the feds or whomever to do something useful.

      Or maybe not. Otherwise, I pretty much agree with your post. Not only does this seem like an expensive waste of time, but potentially dangerous if some idiot comes along and misconfigures the honeypot (or if an idiot put it up in the first place). Unless your workplace is idiot-free. Then it would be OK.

    3. Re:Use of honeypots by Tetsu+no+Chef · · Score: 2, Funny
      I don't understand why everybody suddenly wants to have a honeypot?

      Perhaps they just sound like really good idea on a lonely Saturday night.

    4. Re:Use of honeypots by TrueKonrads · · Score: 1

      I had another tought here and figured that only _real_ usage of it would be building fake systems. They would have to simulate some activity have something in logs, have fake data etc. Now for casual network i don't see much usage apart from way how to entertain admins, but then again, there is Quake

      --
      Lone Gunmen crew.
    5. Re:Use of honeypots by DaytonCIM · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother.

    6. Re:Use of honeypots by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Hehe, "and there I was sitting all alone in my office after hours Friday night, suddently it stroke my mind! I now have the entire weekend to build a entire honeynet!".

    7. Re:Use of honeypots by kasperd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      potentially dangerous if some idiot comes along and misconfigures the honeypot

      This is all about where you place the honeypot. Place the honeypot where it has no more access to your important network than a random computer on the internet would have had. In that case your network is no more vulnurable with the honeypot than without.

      Placing the honeypot in an important network behind your firewall is plain stupid. Placing the honeypot outside the firewall is acceptable. Placing the honeypot in a DMZ zone with nothing else is also acceptable, if the firewall is configured correctly. If the extra leg on the firewall causes more bugs in the setup, two independend firewalls would have been better.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    8. Re:Use of honeypots by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Actually I use several honeypots (RH 7.3, OpenBSD 3.1, and Solaris 9). I patch all known exploits in hopes of finding someone using unknown new ones. So far I have captured a few over the years.

      As for using a honeypot with known vulns. I think it is an ok way to learn but a dangerous one. My honeypots only capture the exploit and then lock out the cracker.

    9. Re:Use of honeypots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome in the info-warfire-world...

      honeypots are pretty cool, like several guys already mentioned - know your enemy.

      well, i'm pretty sure many script-kiddiez out there are pissed off - but you know what ?
      YOU ARE LOOSERS - cross-scripting lamerz !!!

      a real blackhat - you will never find, believe me !!!

      I BELIEVE - see u all ...

      EOF

  2. How many arrests? by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Is this actually leading to arrests? If so, we need more honeypots; if not, it's a waste of time.

    There's a tendency in what passes for a computer security community today to focus on the most numerous threats, rather than the most effective one. Maybe there's only one hit a month from the guy who's breaking in and reading your credit card number file, but that's the person you need to find.

    1. Re:How many arrests? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Honeypots are about more than arrests people, to be honest, IIRC the red tape required to arrest someone for compromising your system hardly makes it worth while. The efforts are almost better spent securing it in the first place.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:How many arrests? by P!Alexander · · Score: 3, Informative

      If so, we need more honeypots; if not, it's a waste of time.

      Perhaps a honeynet on it's own is not terribly useful to the general population. However, the documentation, case studies and other material provided by this SPECIFIC honeynet project has enormous value. Their whitepapers are a very thorough look at real life hacking situations. I could see university classes formed based upon the research and publishing they have done.

      As everybody knows, theory is great but real world examples can be just as, if not more, valuable. And here we have a project that has provided those examples.

    3. Re:How many arrests? by freuddot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this actually leading to arrests? If so, we need more honeypots; if not, it's a waste of time

      This is Soooo Year 2002 thinking.

      How 'bout
      Is this actually leading to less cracked systems? If so, we need more honeypots; if not, it's a waste of time

      Guys, wake up, the whole point is not to arrest people doing bad things. The points is stopping those bad things from happening.

    4. Re:How many arrests? by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Actually, the question is how many firings this leads to.

      More common than not is deploying the honeypot internally as something like "finance server 1" or something similarly obvious. Usually it's not someone breaking in to get the credit card file, it's someone already in who's digruntled, or perhaps a little too curious for their own good.

    5. Re:How many arrests? by bourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is this actually leading to arrests? If so, we need more honeypots; if not, it's a waste of time.

      Honeypots provide a way for people to learn how to deal with an incident on the real servers they protect. Just like emergency personnel hold disaster preparedness drills, just as the US Military stages large red team exercises in the desert, just as medical students use cadavers to learn what they're doing before they cut into a live patient.

      Let's face it - when your database server gets compromised, do you want the guy responding to thrash around, destroy evidence and erase tracks, and generally screw up the response? Or do you want him to do a careful, correct job?

      Honeypots are where admins learn NOT to run around like a chicken with their head cut off.

  3. I love the books by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1

    Personally his books are very intersting. His indepth look, and maybe slight obsession with, hacker's and the such is captivating. I am looking forward to reading this next book.

  4. Broken out of honeypot and wreaked havoc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any documented cases of ill-designed honeypots that ended up as staging platforms of network attack?

  5. "honeypot penetration experience" by pr0nbot · · Score: 5, Funny



    honeypot penetration experience

    *sigh* I remember mine fondly too...

    1. Re:"honeypot penetration experience" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* I remember mine fondly too...

      Some people prefer warm apple pie

  6. Didn't I read this on alt.sex.erotica? by krog · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The structure of the book is different from the "Know Your Enemy": Lance starts from the very beginning - namely, his first honeypot penetration experience and then goes on to talk about all aspects of honeypots.

    yow. interesting topic to start off a book on hackers. :)

  7. not available yet by rawdirt · · Score: 1, Troll

    I wish slashdot would clearly mark availability of books reviewed/previewed. Given the number of times
    publication has been delayed on books reviewed here, this would be a valuable add-on category for the
    review.

  8. Silly ole' bear by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...misconceptions about the honeypots such as the "entrapment" issue...

    You mean Pooh never really got his head stuck in one of those things? :)

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Silly ole' bear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pooh deserved it; he was the jackass, not Eeyore. And that reminds me; I still have to sic my cat on Mickey Mouse.

      *good kitty!*

  9. That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Neil+Watson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get it right. Crackers are the criminals. Hackers are law abiding citizens who are also computer experts.

    1. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get it right, the real world doesn't want to call you a saltine. "Hackers" is wining by shear brute force or ingnorance if you like, but it is still winning.

    2. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who fucking cares? You all know the media isn't going to adopt the term you'd like them to.

    3. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lin-ux/Lie-nux hackers/cracker whatever. Bitch is not a female dog.

      Guess what, language is not static, get over your ivory tower self.

    4. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Tetsu+no+Chef · · Score: 1
      Bitch is not a female dog.

      Except amongst dog afficionados, i.e. professional dog breeders and those Westminster(sp?) Kennel Club types.

      Allowing pop-culture language to take over the specialized vernacular of a special interest group is as foolish as to expect the general public to directly adopt the language of a special interest group. By muddying the meaning of the word "hacker" and letting "cracker" fall into obscurity, you're making efficient communication more difficult.

      If Slashdot wants to be "corerct for nerds" the differences between hacker and cracker should stand. If just pop-culture is desired, hacker is good by itself.

    5. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by z-man · · Score: 1

      If we are going to be specific, hackers don't even have to own a computer or what they do, doesn't even have to relate to a computer.

    6. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by loconet · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! , hes not trolling !.

      Hes ensuring accurate communication is conducted.
      Hackers == Crackers only in pop-culture, and this is a nerd culture so the proper name for those people should be used. CRACKERS!

      --
      [alk]
    7. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > this is a nerd culture so the proper name for
      > those people should be used.

      31337 it is, d00d!

      Seriously, it is "pop-culture," good luck trying to change "pop-culture," and HACKERS have been HACKING into other people's computers for WAY longer than a bunch of people on Slashdot have been calling them CRACKERS!

    8. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Seriously, it is "pop-culture," good luck trying to change "pop-culture," and HACKERS have been HACKING into other people's computers for WAY longer than a bunch of people on Slashdot have been calling them CRACKERS!"

      Thank You!

    9. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by JPriest · · Score: 1

      No, getting a windows manager to boot on your wrist watch is hacking.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    10. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the author of the book being reviewed is suppose to be some sorta expert. You'd expect him to know the language!

    11. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 2

      Honeypots attract leet script kiddies, not crackers. Experienced crackers do not give a shit about a soon-to-be-owned box sitting on a T-1 line.

      -my $.02

    12. Re:That's CRAKCERS not HACKERS by packeteer · · Score: 1

      no no no im tired of hearing that over and over... people who break laws are criminals... a hacker OR cracker can use their skills in a legal or illegal way... why dont you just call them "computer criminals" or "malicious computer users"... the police are trained to know how to shoot people, does that make them criminals? computer experts can be very good at cracking without breaking laws (well other than the DMCA but thats another issue)... crackers are like hackers... black hats, white hats... same skills different motives...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  10. So should we get it or not? by Jadsky · · Score: 1

    "This is the kind of book you don't want..."

    If I don't want it, why is your review so enthusiastic?

    1. Re:So should we get it or not? by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that was poorly worded, but I think he meant to say:

      "This is the kind of book you don't want (...) to put down until the last page is read."

  11. Not gunna happen. by Inominate · · Score: 1

    Tracking a hacker is extremly difficult without becoming one yourself. Most of the time any hacker hacks from another hacked machine. 90% of the time, these machines are ones owned by people who have no clue how to use them, and who's response to being hacked is a fresh default install. So unless you speak chinese, you're probably not going to have a whole lot of luck, unless the hacker is either stupid, or just really screws up.

  12. Stoll did it too... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

    Cliff Stoll set up a honeypot when he was tracking the German hackers.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Stoll did it too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the 4 millionth post ever?

  13. Re:Use of honeypots - for educational purposes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honeypots are very interesting for educational purposes. If you're a security professional (or want to become one), then using a honeypot can provide 'real-world' experience with dealing with crackers, analyzing logs, studying behavior etc. This way if you end up with a job in computer security you won't have to look at your boss after a security breach and shrug "I dunno, I've never actually seen this before". There is a difference between reading and doing. You can learn a lot from reading about something, but you'll learn it in a different way when your fingers are actually on the keyboard and it is actually happening.

  14. Please don't feed trolls. by BlowCat · · Score: 1

    The guy was so in hurry to post it, that he even misspelled "crackers".

  15. Corporate Interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again a corporate stooge spews FUD in the interest of profits. If he was realy an expert he would not use the term "Hacker". Mis-using terminology, though iritating, is understandable from the stupid media, but unaccetpable from so called experts. It appears that these "Security" companies are attempting to create an enviroment of fear in order to increase buisness.

  16. Well thats timely! by Merls · · Score: 1

    I have just discovered my home server has been used to host a load of PS2 software. D'oh

    Word to the wise, dont over look the allow anonymous logons in IIS / FTP. Better pay more attention to the setup in future!

    1. Re:Well thats timely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word to the wiser, Don't use IIS (period)

      There are better alternatives for a web-server...
      jUst my 2 cents

    2. Re:Well thats timely! by Vagary · · Score: 1

      If a children's toy (PS2 running Linux :) is more secure than your server (running a toy OS), you've got worse problems than a lack of attention!

    3. Re:Well thats timely! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look on the bright side, u have a lot of pirated sw. Go buy PS2 and enjoy :)

  17. Academic Value? by Vagary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do honeypots have any value for teaching security experts? Could the study of crackers and cracking techniques ever belong outside the Sociology Dept. at a university?

    I can certainly envision course projects surrounding the analysis of a real honeypot or perhaps a system that has been compramised by the teacher. But would this actually help the students or would they be better off learning in a more theoretical fashion? (Because cracking is too variable and changes too quickly for the study of specific techniques to be of value.)

    1. Re:Academic Value? by DancingSword · · Score: 1

      Use the kata system: have student set up a honeypot, updated and "secure".

      Nugatory its security/function in some way, giving them concrete experience, have 'em set it up again, secure. Nugatory it in some different way. They're warned that it's going to be defeated, yet the experience of having to discover when/what/where/how it was defeated creates vigilance-meaningfulness in their mind. Book-knowing cannot do this. Ever.

      ( back to the kata-system ) When they've got the hang of dealing with one compromise at a time, hit 'em with a multi-compromise script using some group of problems that will test ( but not panic/break ) 'em. Do it again, using different combos, mixing 'em up, designing the choice-of-attacks so that they get to deal with as fundamentally diverse a group of attacks as possible ( rather than 20 variations of a single motif )

      Book-knowing and theory don't deeply convince, and cannot convince, in ways that change living-expression ( compared with concrete experience -- just compare someone who's "read about" grief with someone who's embedded in it: one knowing doesn't change one's Mind, the other deeply/really does ).

      --
      Messages to/for me ( in me journal )
  18. Biased review? by kbroom · · Score: 1


    Although the review seems pretty interesting, don't you think that it might be a little biased? He is doing a talk on a conference lead by Lance Spitzner pretty soon. (Look for COUNTER-INTELLIGENCE IN INTERNET SECURITY: HONEYPOT BEST PRACTICES)

  19. Hit count, not arrest count. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Arrests are meaningless.

    I want to know how many kneecappings and crushed hands have resulted from skript kiddiez going after the wrong targets.

    Teach the ankle-biters to steer clear of networks owned (in all senses of the word) by Guido and "doze computer-talking guys dat be wit us, watchacall'em, geeks or sumthin? fuggetabout'it."

    Hit count takes on a whole new meaning in this context,
    Capice?

    Disclaimer IANAMM (I am not a made man, but my brother-in-law was, at least until they found him stuffed in the trunk of his caddy)

  20. owned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would you trust someone who got owned?

    the hacker who does not take credit is who survives, not some of those self-proclaimed security "experts".

  21. tracking hackers is easy for the slashdot crowd by Jacer · · Score: 2

    just find any of us and hand him or her a mirror

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  22. Real world applications? (Was "Academic Value?") by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    Can the study of the behavior of attackers ever NOT be of value to the defenders?

    Detectives study the behavior of criminals, The FBI studies the behavior of terrorists, ROTC students study the behavior of attacking armies, and network security analysts study the behavior of crackers.

    Not every cop is a "Criminologist", not every sysadmin needs to be a "Security Analyst".

  23. Got one here by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Funny

    My employer is hosting an extremely intricate and rather sizeable home-grown honeypot solution.

    It was supposed to be our corporate web server, but our sysadmin is a dolt.

  24. Pre-Order Only by dehex · · Score: 2, Informative

    You have to place an advance order and wait a month and a bit till it comes out.

    Amazon.com has a cheaper price ($31.49) and an early release date (Sept 20th) than Barnes&Noble.com ($35.99, release Sept 27th).

    Looking forward on reading it :-)

    --
    Opensource=Openmind=Freedom
  25. Come and get me. by sn00perz · · Score: 0

    My handle may not mean anything to you, but I'm well known in the l337 hax0r circles. I've started hacking in the early 80s when I aquired an old 80486 compute. Withing months I made my way into the inner circle by filling my tiny by todays hard-drive with over 3 giga-bytes of 0 day warez. Later I installed FreeBSD (liux wasnt avalible back in the 80s) and j00wned hundreds of machines woithoput ever getting caught. The 3l337 is out there. Phear me.

    --

    Down with Crapitali$m. Anarchy NOW!
    1. Re:Come and get me. by Windows+Me · · Score: 1

      Debian is not communism because it is not programed in china to my knowledge it is rarley used there. One thing I don't understand why hack other peoples computers?

      --
      This was written to use up your time hahahssa alaahsdhaj asdjfkjafjkfsd gsdd.dsgfsg gf.fs dsf dfdfds gffgfd
    2. Re:Come and get me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Crackers (hackers) don't gloat about their cracks!!! nuff said.

    3. Re:Come and get me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80486? in the early '80s? Uhhuhhh...
      Can you say troll?

    4. Re:Come and get me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for fun & profit ;)

    5. Re:Come and get me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit of advice: Learn the trade b4 u post in slashdot. Don't ask stupid questions. And never, NEVER, go around in a "Windows Me" alias.

  26. Entrapment Issue? by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 2

    What entrapment issue? Entrapment only happens when a person is convinced by a law enforcement official to do something that they wouldn't ordinarily do.

    If someone gets stuck in a honeypot, he ordinarily would've been attempting to scan my system...

    --

    - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

    1. Re:Entrapment Issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with scanning a system ? If your curtains are open and I peek through your house, is that a crime ? Without arracking a system, scans are valid and should not constitute a crime. Plus I would love to see you set up a honey pot that would fool a serious cracker. The only thing you will catch is script kiddies. Devote the amount of time to securing your server rather than creating honeypots. Plus I have machine which runs Linux. Why would I wanna crack into a lowly Solaris or Winblowz machine.

    2. Re:Entrapment Issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your curtains are open and I peek through your house, is that a crime ?

      Why yes, yes it is. Unless you happen to live in Peeping Tomville.

  27. Great Name.... by UncleGizmo · · Score: 1

    for a hippy/hacker band.

    Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome the Honeypot Penetration Experience!

    --
    Who put this thing together? Me, that's who.
  28. Re:What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google should.

  29. Anyone know of a /real/ hacking book? by jago25_98 · · Score: 0

    Every so often we hear of a book such as
    "Hacking Exposed", "Lean how to Hack!" and other sensationalist titles to increase sales.

    Typically these aren't what they masquerade as since if they did it ...wouldn't get published?

    So, can anyone tell me where I might find a published book telling people how to hack maliciously with little intent on how to prevent it.

    Perhaps there's some old ones available that got published before people relised what hacking is?
    I'd find it amusing to get a book like it from the library.

    In fact, I'd love to find a "Banned Books" second hand book store, tat could be a laugh.

    I expect I may have to come from a country with more / different approach to freedom of speech such as around asia, Russia, Central-Americas.