Slashdot Mirror


SciFi Motherlode Donated to Canadian University

Freshly Exhumed writes: "SciFan aficionados might soon be lining up to study at the University of Calgary due to an amazing donation: A massive collection of science fiction and pulp magazines spanning the last century has been donated to the University of Calgary which officials say will be a boon for literary and pop culture research. William Gibson had spent many of his 92 years sealing his prized collection in plastic, leaving behind a true motherlode of science fiction writings."

125 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Since He Was 95... by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when he died, I assume this was the other William Gibson.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Since He Was 95... by RDW · · Score: 5, Funny

      They have a freezer full of them in the Gibson orbital villa. The family AI just releases another clone from hibernation as required, and sends him down on the next JAL shuttle. I believe the current Gibson is 3Bill.

    2. Re: Since He Was 95... by Omniscient+Ferret · · Score: 2, Informative
      The William Gibson who wrote Neuromancer was born in 1948. Which cheers me up, as I thought Gibson had been working on a book.

      Um, unless of course this is a collection & obituary sent back in time...

    3. Re:Since He Was 95... by zCyl · · Score: 2

      ...when he died, I assume this was the other William Gibson.

      Maybe he waited until he could read before he started collecting Sci-Fi... *shrug*

    4. Re:Since He Was 95... by EEEthan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But who IS this other, older and yet sci-fi loving William Gibson???

      I for one am not ready to count out the idea that time travel was involved and that this is the cyberpunk author William Gibson. I think that the age of some of the pieces in the collection supports that theory as well.

      As we all know, the sci-fi writers of the 20th century are, in the future, remembered as pre-cogs, and for that reason, they are sometimes retrieved by time dredge by interested parties in the distant future. Phil Dick tells us that this happened on one occasion to Poul Andersen. It seems conceivable that this happened to Gibson, but he was returned to a different time, either accidentally or for some purpose -- perhaps to amass this very sci-fi collection.

      But why ??? What forces are at work here ?

    5. Re:Since He Was 95... by AndrewFG · · Score: 1

      Hi - since there was some concern about which William Gibson this was, please let me tell you about him. This William Gibson was William Robert (Bob) Gibson, a long time resident of Calgary, Alberta. He collected SF & F material, starting in the mid 1920s until he couldn't anymore, some time in 1999 or 2000. He died on Jan 8, 2001. There is lots more information at >

  2. Hopefully... by Kyzia · · Score: 1

    Some of this stuff will find its way to ibiblio or some other online archive..

  3. They need $$$ to clean and preserve the material! by silentbozo · · Score: 2

    According to the article, library officials estimated that $250,000 (in Canadian dollars, I'm assuming) would be needed to clean and restore the material. I think this would be a worthy project to contribute to, especially with the favorable exchange rate.

    I've been looking over the UCalagary library site but I couldn't find any explicit donation mechanism. Anyone know who to contact to donate funds to preserve this material?

  4. digitize? by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    so um.... they're gonna scan/digitize it all, right? having a hard copy is nice and all, but i'd rather see all of these volumes of sci fi gone to the knife, and scanned in, at say, 600 dpi, and then OCR'd.

    from what it sounds like in the article, they're going to catolouge this and stick it on a shelf for people to read... like the article mentions, pulp fiction sci fi was meant to be thrown away...those books will only last a few precious years of handling before they're lost forever.

    i've seen a few book digitizing devices, but i've never seen them in wide use at libraries....does the library of congress digitize their library? is there anyway to access/query it? a book only lasts forever, as does a digital copy and the means to read the digital copy, but an obscure dusty book on a dusty shelf out of reach halfway across the country from me isn't going to help me much on my college thesis (or 10,000 other people who might need to access exerpts of the book for some reason or another)

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:digitize? by Barbarian · · Score: 2

      I really doubt that this will get put onto the general circulation shelves...

      More likely they will keep them in the reserve room, and if you want to look at anything, you might have to stick with copies.

    2. Re:digitize? by Bartmoss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, a paper book can last for centuries, while digital media is degrading very quickly.

    3. Re:digitize? by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A paper book can last for centuries if it's printed on acid-free paper -- but most SF and other pop/pulp literature is not, and you'll be lucky if a 50-year-old paperback is still in one piece, and doesn't fall apart when you try to turn the pages.

      As for digital media, there's no reason in theory why it couldn't be built to last for centuries. In practice, of course, such things would probably be too expensive, but I fully expect to see some longer-lived digital media (at least equivalent to acid-free paper) before the century is out.

    4. Re:digitize? by Nick+Barnes · · Score: 5, Interesting
      those books will only last a few precious years of handling before they're lost forever.

      This is almost certainly not the case. The idea that books turn to dust on the shelves is largely false. Even books printed on quite acidic paper will probably last for centuries (with typical research library handling frequency) if they are well looked after. If they are cut up and fed into scanners, they will then be thrown away. Experience suggests that the scans will be of mediocre quality (missing some pages, missing parts of other pages, frequently having insufficient contrast to be legible, and losing any colour or greyscale information present in the originals). Also lost would be all the historical value inherent in the books as physical objects and in the collection as a whole.

      The "slow fires" were invented by technocrat library managers as propaganda to generate funds for "preservation" projects. These huge projects have given the managers much power and prestige while destroying millions of volumes of irreplaceable books and newspapers. Read Double Fold (Nicholson Baker, Amazon) for much more on this subject.

    5. Re:digitize? by Adrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agree completely. Books (even on acidic paper) are a lot more robust than many people make out. The much maligned librarian profession have been doing this for many years and are *very* good at it.

      That said, it is also possible to do non-destructive scans of material at a very high quality. There are some nice examples at the British Library (the actual place, no idea if it's online). However this, of course, expensive --- so is unlikely to be done in this case. Pity.

    6. Re:digitize? by Snard · · Score: 2

      Actually, a paper book can last for centuries, while digital media is degrading very quickly.

      In practice, that is true; however, you can easily copy the partially-degraded (but still readable, due to error correction) copy onto the latest media format, without loss of fidelity or information, as long as you don't wait too long.

      --
      - Mike
    7. Re:digitize? by Mirk · · Score: 1
      Experience suggests that the scans will be of mediocre quality (missing some pages, missing parts of other pages, frequently having insufficient contrast to be legible, and losing any colour or greyscale information present in the originals).

      Oh. I see your point.

      Or - no - wait! Why not (get this) do the scanning right? D'ya think that might work? Huh? Do ya? Do ya?

      --

      --
      What short sigs we have -
      One hundred and twenty chars!
      Too short for haiku.
    8. Re:digitize? by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Experience suggests that the scans will be of mediocre quality (missing some pages, missing parts of other pages, frequently having insufficient contrast to be legible, and losing any colour or greyscale information present in the originals).

      What type of experiance? The quality of the scans is of course dependent on how carefully they are done. Notice that the National Yiddish Book Center/Steven Spielberg Digital Yiddish Library did just that to a lot of the books, and produced high enough quality scans to make new books from them.

      Also, I sometimes scan public-domain books into the computer. I just sent scans of several books to someone with webspace and a preexisting site. If you look at those scans, you may get the impression that the contrast and grayscale was lost. What you probably don't realize, is that those are scaled for the web, at 90 KB for two pages. It's not feasible to put up the original 4 MB scans, and few really care about the difference. I would assume that other projects would be similar; you can get excellent scans if you talk to the person, but they aren't going to waste webspace and bandwidth offering huge high-detail scans to everyone who wanders by.

    9. Re:digitize? by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

      Yes, as long as you don't wait too long. Granted, it has slowed down a bit, but there was this story about nasa losing data faster than they were able to copy it to modern media. (I'm too lazy to look, you do it.)

      That said I agree that an electronic archive would be great. If nothing else, it makes the collection so much more accessible. But don't ruin the originals for it.

    10. Re:digitize? by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      I think giving them 98 years is a little generous ;o)

    11. Re:digitize? by bjb · · Score: 1

      Well, the only thing I would be worried about is the freakin' idiots that could get their hands on the original documents and vandalize them in some fashion. I've got some original print Peanuts (Charlie Brown / Snoopy, for those who can't make the connection) from the 50's, and they've survived all these years just fine. However, I wouldn't dare let any family member below the age of 13 touch them in fear that their brown pages might get harmed.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    12. Re:digitize? by torpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Church of Scientology has some pretty impressive technology which they developed for preservation of L. Ron Hubbards materials - too bad they don't commercialize their techniques, because they're quite advanced.

      All of the audio material is stamped on titanium records guaranteed to last 1,000's of years, for example, and they even developed a paper for their printed material which is fireproof, acidproof, bugproof, and supposed to last 10's of thousands of years. Some sort of blend of Irish linen or something - very high quality stuff.

      Say what you will about CoS, but Author Services has been doing a pretty good job of preserving the stuff they want to preserve.

      They could commercialize their techniques and make a fortune.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    13. Re:digitize? by duck+'o+death · · Score: 1
      but an obscure dusty book on a dusty shelf out of reach halfway across the country from me isn't going to help me much on my college thesis

      You can get pretty much any book from pretty much any university in North America through Document Delivery or similar dept. at your library. They check out OCLC (IIRC), and as long as the book isn't in a special collection (and sometimes even then) they'll get it for you. Special Collections books will even be photocopied for you, usually for a small fee, by the other library.

      --
      Don't put salt in your eyes.
    14. Re:digitize? by aallan · · Score: 2

      Experience suggests that the scans will be of mediocre quality (missing some pages, missing parts of other pages, frequently having insufficient contrast to be legible, and losing any colour or greyscale information present in the originals).

      Really? I think most astronomers would disagree, the ADS has scanned a significant fraction of the back catlogue of astronomical journals. While most of the journals now publish electronic editions as well as paper most of these only go back to the mid to late 90's, online access to the back catalogue is amazingly useful for research. A full list of back catalogue of journals they provide access to is here as you can see they've scanned some of them all the way back to the 1880's or 90's. Scan quality is uniformly good, I've yet to find a badly scanned journal article and I' use this service every day.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    15. Re:digitize? by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      I know! We'll go with the best of both worlds!

      We'll set up this shop where someone in the front reads from the book and everyone else copies down the words into -new- books. Heck, you could even add caligraphy to the words to spice it up some.

      I'm going to be rich!

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    16. Re:digitize? by topham · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a compression/file format called MrSID. It is very impressive. My mother access a website which has scanned copies of Census data from the 1800's, etc. These are huge archives, but the files are only about 150K per page (or less!). These are high-resolution scans. I was very impressed.

      Now the GPS/mapping software I use supports it, but I have no way to create MrSID files, or I would.

    17. Re:digitize? by Nick+Barnes · · Score: 1
      What type of experiance?

      As I said in the comment to which you are responding, read Double Fold for much more on this. I don't have the time or inclination to repeat the details of all the hugely expensive and disastrously destructive "preservation" projects that Baker documents there. Yes, it is possible to scan (or photograph) books non-destructively, and to get good results. For all I know, the Yiddish project you identify is an example of such good practice, which I fully support. But the great majority of the books, newspapers, and journals "preserved" in the last fifty years have in fact been destroyed in the process, replaced at great cost by a shoddy partial copy with a shorter shelf-life.

      Baker's remarks about contrast, colour, and greyscale are mostly for microfilm results, for which it is the normal deliberate decision to use very high-contrast film, hugely compressing the dynamic range of the original. Digital scans also usually lose much of the dynamic range, but are often not as appalling as microfilm. It has a lot to do with the technology chosen for scanning, and less to do with the size of the resulting images. Digital preservation projects usually scan in 8-bit greyscale at 600dpi, which is woefully inadequate, of course. And the results are often kept in proprietary formats in proprietary Document Management Systems.

      That's all I'm going to say on the subject. Read the book.

    18. Re:digitize? by topham · · Score: 2

      I have access to a small collection that is rapidly degrading. 'Pulp' publications from the 40s are falling apart. Once the process starts it is quite rapid. I doubt most of it will last another 50 years.

    19. Re:digitize? by colmore · · Score: 2

      They could commercialize their techniques and make a fortune.

      You aren't suggesting that the Church of Scientology is out to make a profit are you?

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    20. Re:digitize? by Scaba · · Score: 1
      ...while digital media is degrading very quickly.
      You said it. Just look at the degrading crap that gets posted here.
    21. Re:digitize? by Some+Woman · · Score: 1

      Also lost would be all the historical value inherent in the books as physical objects and in the collection as a whole.

      Very true. Last year I was doing a history research project that involved reading primary sources. I found a library that had an original copy of "The Complete Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle" from 1700. Sure, it's just somebody who made an anthology of somebody else's writing, and it may not seem very important, but I'm glad they kept it. Long ago, they could have decided not to keep these monstrous books around and put them on micrfiche. They apparently saw the inherent value in an old book, though. As fascinating as the actual writing were the books themselves. The were 2 ft by 1 ft (huge and heavy), and the pages were thick and textured. The quirks of the printing press and the rough pages made the experience more rewarding than if I had just been able to sit down and look at some photocopies. The book itself has as much to tell as the writing on its pages.

      --
      My dingo ate your honor student.
    22. Re:digitize? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Instead of destroying books in the process of scanning them, why not use a high-end digital camera? Surely it could be automated to some degree, so all that's needed is someone to carefully turn the pages and push the "Next" button.

      I have books over 100 years old, including some fairly rare first editions, and the idea of cutting them up to scan them gives me great pain. I'd rather make the extra effort to process 'em one page at a time, tedious as that would be compared to despining 'em and running 'em thru a sheetfed scanner.

      Remember, too, that given the relatively ephemeral nature of even the best digital media, and the problems of accessing outdated media and file formats, a digital copy is of no real archival value if it doesn't have a hardcopy backup.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:digitize? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then again, since CoS's Author Services doesn't *share* their document preservation methodology, how do you know it's not just more CoS hype? My guess is that it doesn't really exist, outside of a few examples to use as lures.

      And Irish linen burns quite nicely, thank you.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    24. Re:digitize? by doggo · · Score: 1
      " Actually, a paper book can last for centuries, while digital media is degrading very quickly."

      While this may be true, a sane, or at least forward thinking archivist will be prepared to move digital archives over to newer or better media as the need arises.

      Of course this does not take into account financing, which in these budget-cutting, practical-money-making-research-and-projects-takes -precedence-over-pure-research -or-preserving-human-knowledge-and-art times is an iffy thing.

    25. Re:digitize? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      Instead of destroying books in the process of scanning them, why not use a high-end digital camera?

      There are high end scanners. They are incredibly expensive (~$10,000) and, since the page isn't pressed flat, it can be hard to get a good scan. But even given only a flatbed scanner, it's a lot easier to get good scans without destroying the book than a lot of people seem to think.

    26. Re:digitize? by dmoynihan · · Score: 1

      I'm excited at the possibilities for this archive. I tend to share the beliefs of those who argue that the death of print was over-hyped.

      However, if you want a tale of digital overkill: the gang at the Library of Congress (folks who jacked up the cost on Internet radio among other lovely inventions), decided to render pulps from the late teens-'30s into microfilm.

      The LOC did the entire collection of Amazing Stories, Weird Tales and something called Black Mask (why I'd be really, really, really interested), but they're not too good about sharing (of course), and who knows how long before the microfilm begins to degrade?

      Sometimes I wonder if I should start contributing to a Republican like Lynn Cheney just to access the works. Then I realize the system is flawed. Then I sigh, rub the dog's belly, and go have a cigarette.

      Hope Calgary does a better job with this bit 'a wealth.

    27. Re:digitize? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Thank goodness. Yes, I know these scanners exist, but from what people were saying, it sounds like more often than not, an ordinary flatbed and the despinery approach is taken instead. :(

      Tho $10k isn't a very large investment compared to a library full of irreplaceable books.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    28. Re:digitize? by jmcwork · · Score: 1

      Let's hope they don't want to preserve a copy of 'Battlefield Earth'

    29. Re:digitize? by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      That's a very different case. That kind of serious scholarly work was done with the best, most expensive, and painstaking processes of the time. The paper was probably rag-based.

      That's a hell of a lot different from some 1950-era paperback printed on the cheapest acidic paper available, using the lousiest binding method that didn't immediately fall apart on the bookseller's shelf.

    30. Re:digitize? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Black Mask was a mystery magazine, a mag in which the likes of Dashiell Hammet, Paul Cain, and Raymond Chandler were published.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    31. Re:digitize? by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Sad thing is, people who do the HQ Manga scans for fan translations and pirating have excellent experience in the field and touch up each image individually, often times spending weeks or months on each issue.

      The results are fabulous looking originals that are then mangled by idiots who recompress them to 30KB JPEGs so they can shove them on their Geocities account. . . .

      Good pirated books are simular too, there are a fair number of groups of people who translate books into PDF formate illegaly, and the better groups do a darn good job at it. Of course the lower quality groups, err, suck. A lot. :(

    32. Re:digitize? by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      What we need is a 'prism scanner' :)
      Just a vertical wedge that you can open the boot and drape over the narrow edge of the wedge, scan, flip the page, and repeat. So the spine of the book is totally unstressed.
      OK you MIT students, get to work :)

    33. Re:digitize? by Dubber · · Score: 1

      "Even boks printed on quite acidic paper will probably last for centuries..." is a global statement by Nicholson Baker.
      Both should be taken with a serious dose of skepticism. Mr.
      Baker has as issue with major newspaper collections being dismantled for microfilming and then discarded. He is a partisian of the worst sort, willing to distort science and observation to make self-aggrandizing statements. He has this huge collection of old (ca. 1900-1940) acid paper newspapers that he lets anyone handle. He expects this collection to be usable for centuries. Ask to use this collection, if he deems you worthy he'll let you I have & it's almost unusable now, let alone 20 years from now.
      If you've ever tried to read old pulp fiction even from as recent as the 60s you'll most likely have experienced the "browning", "fading", & "cracking" acid paper exhibits after even infrequent use.
      As to "well looked after" a quick browse though the climate controlled set of stacks at NYPL Research Libraries (any level including those under Bryant Park--if they were open stacks, which they're not) would show the same deterioration. I was lucky enough to work there for some time. From experience - my experience - Baker is talking out his butt.
      You're right, no links. If you're interested enough you'll find it yourself.

      --
      Your complaints about being offended offend me.
  5. Well it has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Imagine if this was a porn collection.

    1. Re:Well it has to be said by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually of all the universities, Cal State Northridge has the largest porn collection in the nation, mainly due to its location near the porn capital of the USA - Chadsworth, CA. Most of their stuff comes from the Vern and Bonnie Bullough Collection, which was donated a while back.

      Be forewarned, these are part of a special collection on "Human Sexuality" and can't be checked out the library. I don't think you can even browse the collection without requesting permission, but it's nice to know there's a larger collection of porn in comparison to what's under your bed.

      -Mr. Fusion

    2. Re:Well it has to be said by smellmyfart · · Score: 1

      one can only dream, my ass would move to Canada overnight!

      --
      First, you have to know, not fear, know that someday you are going to die
  6. doubtful by Phantros · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probably not, since most things published after 1922 aren't in the public domain, and very little science fiction is that old.

    --

    4Literature - Read, write, and discuss your favor

    1. Re:doubtful by Flamerule · · Score: 4, Informative
      The article:
      University staff were stunned by the size of the donation: upwards of 35,000 volumes dating back to the 19th century [...] It ranges from 19th century Jules Verne [...]

      Kyzia said some of it should get to ibiblio, and since some of it is from the 19th century, that's eminently reasonable. That "very little science fiction" includes authors like Jules Verne, whose stuff is already available online, courtesy of Project Gutenberg. And while we're visiting the 19th century, though the article doesn't mention him, also freely available are the works of H.G. Wells.

  7. role of women... by jukal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder what material can NOT be used to study the role of women in society and whether the studies already cover enough. Odd that this is what the interviewed professor first thought about. Well, it must be utterly interesting ;)

    1. Re:role of women... by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, you can take a look at how trends in society have affected literature. I remember picking up a copy of The Voyages of Doctor Doolittle and finding that this newer edition had totally removed all references to the word "negro", since the original text might offend some younger readers (the Gutenberg linked above has the original, I think.)

      I recently read a book by Ben Bova (The Watchmen), a re-release of a pair of novels originally written in the 60's, where he specifically says in the 1994 foreword that he did NOT alter the original text, and hence you would find women referred to generically as "girls".

    2. Re:role of women... by zCyl · · Score: 2

      Of interest:

      role of women produces 2,780,000 hits.

      role of men produces 2,590,000 hits.

      It would seem men are the under-studied gender by google-counting.

    3. Re:role of women... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the great thing about having large quantities of original material. You can use it to study whatever is currently fashionable.

  8. Re:They need $$$ to clean and preserve the materia by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    if by "preserve" they mean "digitize" for public consumption, then count me in

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  9. donations by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have a page on donations here, nothing specific about the library but I'm sure you could specify that a donation is for the library.

    1. Re:donations by Flounder · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, if you donate to a public institution, and designate that the donation may only be used for a specific purpose, then that donation may not be used for anything but that purpose.

      Now, that's in the US, I don't know about Canada.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    2. Re:donations by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      I believe the exact opposite is true. If you donate to a charitable organization, they can use the funds any way they want. By law you cannot specify how the funds will be used. Thus the Red Cross/World Trade Center scandal - millions were donated to the Red Cross to support families of victims of 9/11 and the Red Cross decides to build out a call center. If the law were other than I believe then there would be lawsuits and criminal charges against the Red Cross. Instead, the Red Cross merely pledges to do better next time (rather like a politician in an election year).

      I don't know if universities are considered charitable organizations or not, and I don't know how Canadian law works.

      Regardless, if you want to donate, you should contact the library and find out how you can help financially and how you can be assured that your funds will go to help the restoration of this collection. Otherwise, you might be buying knick-knacks to decorate the home of the university's president (or regent, or chancellor, or whatever he's called).

    3. Re:donations by NotoriousDAN · · Score: 1

      Universities in Canada do accept charitable donations, and do issue receipts for income tax purposes, however I don't know how useful such a receipt would be to a foreigner.

      Also, a quick search revealed that in Ontario and BC (at least) if a purpose is specified, they must spend the money on that. Presumably this would be similar in Alberta, but I don't know for sure.

    4. Re:donations by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

      It's the same in Alberta as well. (I am from Alberta originally.)

      I think most of the provinces have that rule.

      --
      ~ kjrose
  10. Responsibility for preserving information... by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who's responsible for preserving information if the copyright holder doesn't do it? There's a lot of material generated over the past century that's turning to dust, or has been shoveled into landfills (many MGM props/old negatives were THROWN AWAY by the studio in the 70's to save space...)

    With this mania about preventing copies, I can see a day when NOBODY can benefit from when copyright expires on an item, because it's long mouldered away, neglected by it's owner, and locked away from those who would have preserved it. Really, copyright should be shortened to a reasonable period, or else compulsory licensing to libraries and archives should be part of the deal, in order to ensure that the stuff the copyright owner makes money off of today can be enjoyed by the public tommorrow.

    After all, the intent of copyright was to ensure the public had access to creative works, but making sure the creator had an incentive (ie, they got paid) to release their work and profit by it. But the key intent is to make sure that the work is acessible to all, so that the public as a whole can benefit. After all, that's why we have libraries, so that the society as a whole can be enriched.

    Unfortunately, there are some who believe the exact opposite, that money should come before the public good... and they can afford to hire politicians to write laws that enforce that belief, and the lawyers to make it stick. The irony here is that corporations too were created for the public good.

    And it doesn't look like any concrete reform is going to come out of Enron and Worldcom. We really need to address the issue of corporations divorcing themselves from the rest of society, and acting as if they're above the law. Perhaps we need to go back to chartering corporations with specific aims that can benefit the public, by power of the state legislatures again?

    1. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by davidgunnar · · Score: 1

      I've often thought that copyright should last only as long as the holder keeps the original available. For example, a book copyright would expire when it was out of print - i.e. when the publisher stops selling it, it's in the public domain.

    2. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      ...a book copyright would expire when it was out of print -- i.e. when the publisher stops selling it, it's in the public domain.

      Except that copyright tends to be held by the author, and it'd certainly be unreasonable to end an author's rights to his or her book just because a given publisher decided to stop printing it for whatever reason.

      Would your scheme deny any copyright protection to unpublished work, or would it come into effect only when something was published?

    3. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Copyright holders like to liken books things such as land. Well, one concept in real property is "squatters rights". In some US states, you can still LOSE you land for letting it lie idle. Someone else can come along, improve it, and ultimately have a legal claim to it.

      This goes beyond the simple fact that copyright was specifically intended to increase the pool of available material. If a work is not available, why should the government go to the trouble to protect the author's interests.

      Authors should hold up their end of the bargain.

      If their publisher doesn't have any interest in making money off the work anymore, just what value does it hold for the author anymore?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by Isthistakenyet? · · Score: 1

      However, a publisher that wanted to stick it to a writer could stop publishing the book, wait a bit for it to fall into the public domain, then start publishing it again without having to pay royalties to the author.

      I think a better solution would be to simply revert to more reasonable copyright durations.

    5. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      However, a publisher that wanted to stick it to a writer could stop publishing the book, wait a bit for it to fall into the public domain, then start publishing it again without having to pay royalties to the author.

      Not that i necessarilly agree with the proposed solution, but i don't think that that would really benefit the publisher.

      Look how many people swap media now even though it's technically illegal. You think people would keep buying it if all of the sudden it was perfectly legitimate to d/l a free copy?

      Of course if i were going to write the law myself, i would put in a safeguard or two. After X amount of time goes by without the material being available all contracts regarding it would be nullified and control would revert to the author. After X + a year, the copyright would expire if the author hadn't made it available again.

      Of course given what i've heard about the RIAA the first part of that would be a great idea even right now.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      One problem authors have been having is that they may have clauses where material reverts back to them in the event that the publisher stops selling their book, but publishers are weaseling out of the clause by putting the book on a "print on demand" list. Techically the book is "still in print", but the publisher may not be promoting the book at all, and is essentially squatting on the right to the book.

    7. Re:Responsibility for preserving information... by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      If their publisher doesn't have any interest in making money off the work anymore, just what value does it hold for the author anymore?

      Uhh, artistic value? And beyond that, don't forget:

      1. It is still the author's creation.
      2. There is more than one publisher in the world; another may be willing to pick it up at a future time.

      And, further to number two, isn't it obvious that publishers could let books go out of print, or just sit on manuscripts, until their unavailability caused the author's copyright to expire and then publish, shafting the author?

      In any event, your proposed law would establish a responsibility my part to surrender control of my creations and give them away for free for others to use in ways that could very well conflict with my original artistic intentions.

      Under your scheme, the "ROI" for artists becomes even lower than it already is, while the risk of losing control of one's own work increases tremendously.

  11. elderly by kipple · · Score: 1, Redundant
    William Gibson had spent many of his 92 years...

    ....pardon me?

    --
    -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
  12. Re:I wonder... by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Funny

    The collection is science fiction. Star Wars is a samurai movie, so it probably doesn't qualify. :)

  13. Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by djshiawase · · Score: 5, Informative
    When I first saw this, was I the only one who panicked and thought, "No, not him!" I'm referring, of course, to cyberpunk founder William Gibson. But a quick look at the article tells me it isn't him - anyway I know he's been around a while now, but certainly not 92 years of age!

    I've been looking forward to the first book of his 'noughties trilogy'. As well as the slow progression (but certainly inevitable!) of Neuromancer and the Zen Differential, based on Count Zero, to the silver screen.

    A big sigh of relief, and what a big boon to our understanding of the past's view of the future, it's now when hindsight truly makes the hopes and fears of past people known.

    --
    they made me do it
    1. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by ProtoCat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, even according to William Gibson, the credit of the first cyberpunk story belongs to John Shirley, who wrote both the vastly superior 'City Come A'Walkin' and the short story 'Tricentennial'. Even Sterling has done forwards for Shirley's books. Shirley also has the credits for doing the screenplay to the Crow.

      Then again, I suppose most people are used to Gibson, someone who wrote 'Neuromancer' out of his fear of computers, as the 'father' of Cyberpunk.

      For more information on John Shirley

    2. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by hymie3 · · Score: 2

      I had the same experience you did. Then I thought that maybe they meant '92 as in 1992. Oddly enough, what got me turned onto cyberpunk was Neuromancer, the game for the C64 (with soundtrack by Devo!). After playing that, I stopped reading Golden Age SF and went almost entirely mainstream cyberpunk.

      Golden Age seems to have a very rosy outlook on life. Even Asimov's bleakest cloud had the silver lining of the Foundation saving the day. CJ Cherryh wrote "Life, it goes on, you know?" (erm, pardon, dont remember the name of the book, but can describe the cover)
      Golden Age SF seemed to say "Tech (eventually) conquers all!" but cyberpunk states "Life, even with my Fujitsu eyeballs and Sony GreyMatter upgrades, still sucks."

    3. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Neuromancer, the game for the C64 (with soundtrack by Devo!)

      Didn't that have a sticker on the package announcing "Soon to be a major motion picture - with soundtrack by Devo!"

      I'm glad I didn't go down to the theater and camp out waiting for tickets to go on sale...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    4. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by stripes · · Score: 2
      CJ Cherryh wrote "Life, it goes on, you know?" (erm, pardon, dont remember the name of the book, but can describe the cover)

      Please do. I find a lot of the union-allience "worlds" that CJ Cherryh writes at least as depressing as the Cypherpunk stuff. Or maybe that is just her skill at putting her charactors up against such pressure.

      Of corse cypherpunk tends to be "life, it goes on" too, I mean it sucks, but it drags on. don't they normally steal the vaccene, or uncover the memories, or....I mean very very few cypherpunk books are entirely soul crushing.

    5. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by e40 · · Score: 2
      I'm referring, of course, to cyberpunk founder William Gibson.

      Vernor Vinge has more rights to that claim than Gibson. True Names was published in 1981, 3 years ahead of Neuromancer.

      The True Names reference above is for the re-release of a 20th anniversary edition, that includes 11 essays, one by RMS.

    6. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Moreover, it's widely agreed that Bruce Bethke is the originator of the term 'cyberpunk'. Read his book, 'Headcrash'. It's the story of a geek, and it goes from there. :)

    7. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by hymie3 · · Score: 2

      Didn't that have a sticker on the package announcing "Soon to be a major motion picture - with soundtrack by Devo!"

      Yeah! I remember now! When the game loaded, there was a 30secondish Devo snippet from the alleged soundtrack to the movie. I remember playing the game and thinking how totally badass a move based on the game would be. I guess Matrix fulfilled that desire for me (even though, arguably, it *should* have been Johnny Mnemonic).

    8. Re:Not *the* William Gibson?!?! by dswensen · · Score: 2

      John Shirley this, Vernor Vinge that, William Gibson the other... I say the first cyberpunk story is Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.

  14. Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The equipment to read digital copies doesn't last for centuries, not even for decades.

    Ask those people who had to pay a tonne of money to have their old Wordstar CP/M disks transferred to MS word.

    In a century or more most of what we produced digitally will be gone forever.

    1. Re:Equipment by WNight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is often brought up and is quite misleading.

      Sure, your CD-ROM drive won't last the 100 years they claim the disks will, but it's a documented format and people could easily build a reader if they felt the need. Hell, with a really high-resolution scan you could read the data directly. And that's with CDs, something hard to preserve.

      Xerox (and others) have been working on a printed storage medium, where data is represented by little left or right leaning slashes and encoded with enough error-checking and redundancy that you can recover the data from any piece of paper large enough to hold it. (Put 1/8th of a page of data together and any 1/8th of a page contains all of it.)

      The Xerox method was actually intended for digital watermarks, so that links to the original document would allow people to find it from an old printed copy, and so embed author info, etc, in every page of the document and have it look, to the naked eye, like a uniform light-gray background.

      You could do something like this fairly easily with the intent being to save the data. The storage was fairly impressive, 15k per page or something, and you could use a simple self-documenting compression to cram a lot onto each page. Print these out as your "fall of technology" backup and store properly. Any self-respecting geek could write a reader in very little time. For extra insurance, print a few pages of human-readable text describing the procedure and offering psuedo-code for decompressing the data.

      On the computer, store everything in text-based formats and store it with the appropriate RFCs for the formats for the non-text based data. Even if people forget what XML or HTML are they can still see the original text in there and figure out how to strip that out easily if need be.

      This is assuming that people don't copy the data to a new storage medium when updating their computers, and that the whole world forgets how to access common formats.

      And yes, I do know of which I speak. I've reverse engineered disk-storage formats from old PCs to allow disk-images to be used as file systems on modern PCs, to extract old files, or for high-level emulators to use.

  15. Scanning by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    I hope they scan them all and put up a web-library.

  16. The Merril Collection by _J_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A similar donation was made in 1970 by Judith Merril to the Toronto Public Library. It's a reference library so they don't lend books(bastards).

    A contemporary of Asimov, Leiber, Pohl and others she donated around 5000 items. The collection is now about 57000 items; Novels, Anthologies, Essays and more. What's really neat about the whole thing is that it's housed in a standard Toronto public library and anyone can use their services.

    anyway...
    J:)

    1. Re:The Merril Collection by ab762 · · Score: 1

      When I was at the University of Toronto, 1977-1982, the Merrill Collection was known as the Spaced-Out Library. It was housed in Boys and Girls House, the central children's library - right in the middle of the U of T campus.

      We called it the "Engineering Reading Room" and spent many study and a good few class hours there.

  17. Sniff..... by echucker · · Score: 2

    No Amazing Fantasy #15 :(

    1. Re:Sniff..... by SageLikeFool · · Score: 1

      Amazing Fantasy #15 was comic book (which contains the first appearence of Spider-man and is worth a bunch of cash in even half decent condition). Therefore I doubt most people would count it as a pulp science fiction magazine, and instead call it like it is.

  18. What a coincidence by Jack+Admiral · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I wonder if this collector had any particular interest in cyberpunk? William Gibson owning a massive collection of Science Fiction publications. What an irony if it didn't include one of the pioneers of a significant genre of SF - the cyberpunk worlds of William Gibson.

  19. Hopefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hopefully American libraries are better in preserving modern pop culture magazines and comics than European counterparts where they are considered semi-interesting, un-cultural, crap.

    I once searched for old issues of a pop [yes, music] magazine only to be told there are no copies left in any of the national libraries. All had been stolen. And, the ones I received were torn and had centerfold posters missing, etc.

    Hopefully, Los Americanos can preserve the Donald Duck mentality present in the Western world post-WWII era bewtter than the hopelessly traditional/conventional institutions in Europe like The Vatican, Louvre, etc.

  20. Re:Umm, is this for real? by nagora · · Score: 1, Troll
    Either, this is another canadian sci-fi enthusiast, with the same name as the William Gibson that wrote Neuromancer,

    Yep.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  21. Who will save the Ackermansion? by Comrade+Pikachu · · Score: 3, Informative

    It may be off topic, but Forrest J. Ackerman's marvellous collection of books, artwork, and movie memorabilia is currently being auctioned to bits on Ebay.

    Apparently Forrey needs some cash to retire. Sure would be nice if a benefactor could step in and preserve the collection intact. Visit the Ackermansion here.

  22. i'm thinking about moving to calgary ... by dlasley · · Score: 1

    ... just so i can be closer to this incredible collection. i'm an avid reader of many genres, but i do admit to enjoying sci-fi more than most. i wonder if i can convince anyone here that i need a sabbatical for, oh say, three or four years to explore the impact of sci-fi literature on the dawn of the 21st century. the amazing stories archive alone will take a couple of months ... what the hell, i'm going to try!

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  23. Re:Microsoft by krinsh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the 'average Slashdot user' works in the real world and has to handle a variety of *nixes and Microsoft products; as well as other software, electronics, radio, and the like.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  24. Edit that? by nmnilsson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't you think you should mention he wasn't William Gibson ?

    The article could be about a japanese brain surgeon.
    Half of us would go "What? The father of cyberpunk got a new job in Japan? Cool
    ...
    Doh!"
    anyway... :-)

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
  25. Sci fi everywhere in Canada by duck+'o+death · · Score: 1

    Up here at the University of New Brunswick one of our libraries (www.lib.unb.ca) has a pretty big collection of sci-fi already. It also has a ton of beat lit. -- apparently, both collections are due to the efforts of one English prof in particular who uses the stuff in his classes, but I don't know what kind of pressure he had to exert to get our library admin to buy "non-academic" ... of course, the library in question is at the satellite campus an hour and a half away :(

    --
    Don't put salt in your eyes.
  26. as if? by pompomtom · · Score: 1

    and acting as if they're above the law.


    All the rights, and bugger all of the responsibilities... the day that corporations became above the law passed a long long time ago....
    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
  27. Copywrites, Digitizing, and other thoughts... by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For the most part, the copywrite is owned by the author for his lifespan plus another 70 years after his death. This guarantees that his heirs will also benefit from his work. After that period, the copywrited work is considered public domain.

    If the work was created as work-for-hire (in other words, a publisher/corporation paid the writer to write that piece) then the copywrite can last for a duration of up to 120 years from the publish date.

    So a work-for-hire piece will become public domain sooner than a freelanced piece. Knowing that one's children will benefit from one's hard work and creativity is certainly an incentive to try and create something for the public to enjoy. The more they enjoy it, the more income your family will receive.

    I have a lot of old sci-fi paperbacks that I've collected over the past 30 years. Not that I was collecting them, but I was reading them and then sticking them on my bookshelves. Most of the older ones crumble now when I pull them out to read them. So I'm all for digitizing this collection to preserve it! Using proper storage techniques, yes these paper goods can last for centuries. Thank heavens that Mr. Gibson made some effert to do this! But with today's technology, digitizing would be a more permanent solution.

    I would recommend digitizing at 4000 dpi (optical) to maximize the image quality. 600 dpi would not be adequate for high end printing, should some publisher wish to print some of the collection. I would think that on a university, there would be enough students who are deep afficianados of science fiction who would be quite dedicated to working towards copying this collection with great care.

    Yes, magnetic media fades, but optical media does not. Well, so long as you don't scratch the disk...

    All of the works with a publishing date prior to 1923 could be immediately posted to the internet for access. Works after 1923, permission would be needed from the copywrite holders to be posted digitally, depending on the state of the copywrite. Chances are, with a lot of the older works, permission could be had fairly easily. There are times when the children of the artist are sufficiently well off that they don't need the income, or they would like to see their parent's name become known again, and release some or all of the works to public domain.

    Last, I'd like to point out the shear volume of work and dedication that Mr. Gibson had put into his collection! Finding periodicals that have gone out of print (comic books and the like) is NOT easy! In the article, the brief mention of the traveling Mr. Gibson did should give one an idea of what was involved with this. On top of that, he loved the genre enough to preserve it as best he could. Condsider how we are going to benefit from his work! A nod should also go to his son, Andrew Gibson for making the donation. Just as his father preserved the hard work of many writers and artists, Andrew Gibson has preserved the hard work of his father.

    To the both of you, I'd like to say thank you. To my fellow /.-ers who are fans of science fiction (bet that's most of us), I'd urge you all to make some sort of contribution to continue the preservation of all this hard work. I certainly intend to!

    --


    Whew! This water sure is cold!
    1. Re:Copywrites, Digitizing, and other thoughts... by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      For the most part, the copywrite is owned by the author for his lifespan plus another 70 years after his death. This guarantees that his heirs will also benefit from his work. After that period, the copywrited work is considered public domain.

      Ok, i don't care what they told congress at the time, what the lifespan + 70 (or whatever it si now) guarantees is that Mickey Mouse doesn't fall into the public domain.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:Copywrites, Digitizing, and other thoughts... by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 1

      I cant fucking enjoy something that is not in print and unavailable for ANY PRICE used. So how again am I "The Public" benefited again?

      Exactly!! You got my point exactly correct! You can't enjoy something that is not in print and unavailable! So if you give money to the author of the stuff you like, they can make a living at it and make more of what you enjoy.

      --


      Whew! This water sure is cold!
  28. Re:I wonder... by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

    All words curiously out of sync with lip movement.

    Light saber duel rages through area until, with a single slice, Luke's hand is chopped off.

    Darth Vader: My sword has tasted blood and is sated.
    Luke: I can't even commit Seppuko. My honor is tainted.
    Darth Vader: Obi Wan lied to you. I am your father.
    Luke: Nooooooo.
    Darth Vader: Not that I'd admit that to anyone else after your shameful defeat.

    Luke jumps off edge.

    It would explain Obi Wan. We got the whole ancestral spirit thing going there.

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  29. 92 years?? by christurkel · · Score: 1

    "William Gibson had spent many of his 92 years sealing his prized collection in plastic" Wow! Now THATS dedication!

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
  30. The Collector by msheppard · · Score: 2

    % Suddenly, the Comic Book Guy crashes through the skylight on the
    % type of electromagnet you might see suspended from a crane. He is
    % dressed as ... the Collector.

    Collector: Behold, I am the Collector, and I have come to add
    you to my collection.
    [turns on a magnet, which attracts Lucy's
    breastplate. She sails up to the magnet, where she
    is trapped]
    Lawless: Must ... remove ... my ... breastplate!
    [unties the straps holding it on. Below, everyone
    in the audience produces a camera]
    Maybe later. [reties straps]
    -- "Treehouse of Horror X"

    From BABF01

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  31. Larger than MIT's collection? by patiwat · · Score: 5, Informative

    At 35,000 volumes, that donation certainly makes the Calgary collection larger than the MIT Science Fiction Society's collection. The MITSFS Collection has approximately 25,000 volumes, and is growing. I guess when the Gibson Donation is processed and shelved, it would take away the MITSFS's status as the world's largest open-shelved science fiction collection.

    The size of the Gibson Donation is quite astonishing. The MITSFS Collection supposedly has 90% of all english-language science fiction ever published, and we have deals with the publishing companies to get a copy of every new SF book that comes out - often before the bookstores get them. I guess the Calgary donation has a lot of stuff that we totally overlooked (the Saturday Evening Post stuff), or else a lot of foreign language stuff (MITSFS isn't so strong on Japanese science fiction manga, for instance). If anybody is ever up in Cambridge, check the opening times, and stop by.

    Patiwat Panurach
    patiwat@sloan.mit.edu

    1. Re:Larger than MIT's collection? by SideshowBob · · Score: 2

      Is it just me or does everyone from MIT come off sounding like a braggart? No offense intended, of course...

    2. Re:Larger than MIT's collection? by patiwat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you should see how humble those guys at Harvard are... :)

      But when you put large numbers of like minded geeks together, its sorta natural that they accumulate large collections of geek hardware. For that matter, MIT also has the US's largest circulating anime video collection (you don't have to be a student to borrow) as well as the world's largest model railroad.

  32. Make it electronic. by supabeast! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be wonderful if all of the out-of-print items could be scanned and ORDed as they are catalogued, and make available to the public that way, perhaps put online at some point.I don't know what Canadian copyright laws are like, but hopefully they haven't been hit with a Mickey-Mouse-Protection act like America's leaders sold us out with.

  33. Photos of the collection, etc. by MarvinMouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    U of Calgary has a great press release @

    http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/unicomm/news/gibson/

    with photos of the collection and more. it's really cool, actually.

    --
    ~ kjrose
    1. Re:Photos of the collection, etc. by MarkLR · · Score: 1

      Check out the photo of some of his index cards. He had tracking Robert Silverberg since 1954. I bet even Robert himself does not know the names of all of the stories on those cards.

  34. You forgot the other pop culture reference by azizlumiere · · Score: 1

    The movie Hackers :
    Oh no ! Somebody hack the Gibson !

    --
    -Linux is SO fast it does an infinite loop in 5 seconds.
  35. This will be a boon to SciFi-in-OED researchers by vaxer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been helping to research science fiction terms like 'little green men' for the OED, and I can only gasp and drool and wait for UCalgary's army of cataloging librarians to make the collection accessible to the public.

    This will be a great source of information on how and when science fiction words came into use in English, and if I had a sabbatical-type job, I'd have just found what I wanted to do with my next sabbatical.

    We still need help, by the way, so please help the Oxford English Dictionary learn more about science fiction and fandom.

  36. copywrite and information fade out by 6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Donations like this really make me worry about the coming of the e-book. With e-books there is no ability to give your long horded collection to posterity after death. In fact of the few e-books I have purchased over time I have lost the keys to two of them rendering them inaccessible.

    My chief worry is that once a work becomes economically uninteresting to a major publisher it will vanish from the public's ability to read it. True there may be a copy stored in an ill backed up database in a dark room under the stairs but this does little to enhance our culture or enrich the lifes of the average reader unwilling to brave the, "beware of the leopard", signs.

    Perhaps we need to resurrect the idea of key escrow only this time implementing it for the citizen's benefit. Perhaps as a condition of selling a copyrighted work the publisher should be forced to deposit the work, along with any appropriate keys with an escrow agency. As copyrights lapse the agency would release the works to the public via a website or whatever miraculous technology replaces the web.

    If the government is going to be involved in the guardianship of corporate profits via DMCA etc I would like to see it at least attempt the guardianship of fair use of the cultural heritage we are creating now.

  37. % of tripe ? by tibbar · · Score: 1

    my collection 1200+ books contains 20-30% of really bad writting, poor story line or just crappy books
    -the kindof what the hell am i reading this for type of book ...-

    i wonder what percent of 35000 is low quailty ?

    does it come down to quanity vs quality ??
    (REF: Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance)

  38. Re:Umm, is this for real? by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

    Cripes, you must really be confused with the whole George Bush thing going on in Washington, DC not the state.

  39. Flatline (ot) by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    Nice handle, Dix... :-D

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Flatline (ot) by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I figured I had to find SOME way to weigh in on this conversation. :D

      BTW, cool sig. I just read that story a month or so ago, and it's a favorite of mine, now. :)

  40. Hope it's the right kind of plastic. by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1

    Bad things can happen to plastic (and the things sealed in it) over time. The first order of business should probably be to get the stuff out of whatever it's in and into something with good archival properties.

    Librarians, of course, already know this.

  41. hyperlinked archive by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    it would be very cool to have the note cards mentioned linked with the digital archive. it's a shame that the possibilities of the web are being sacrificed to selfish concerns. i imagine that the new tenth circle to hell will house hillary and her friends. rot baby!

  42. Uk Suck by fm6 · · Score: 2

    I just hope they take better care of Gibson's collection than UCSC took of the stuff Heinlen donated to them. Last time I looked, they still had his pre-Campbell Astoundings in the open stacks!

  43. Optical Media by Detritus · · Score: 2

    Optical media are great until the vendor decides to kill the product line and you can't get new disks, device drivers or replacement parts for the drives. This has happened to data archives I've worked with. You better hope that someone can find the funding to buy a new system and move all the data from the old system before it dies.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Optical Media by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 1

      Magneto-optical drives are not the only type of optical media. A DVD is also optical media, as well as a CD-ROM, as well as a hologram, and the experimental holocards.

      Last time I checked, those had a pretty good lifespan for storage media. And in the case of DVDs and CDs, I think it's a pretty good assumption that those standards will not be made obsolete for a long time.

      --


      Whew! This water sure is cold!
  44. How to donate to the Gibson collection by Darcelle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is the reply I received from the Archives on how to donate $$ for restoration of the collection: Your request for information about donating to restoration of our new collection was passed to me. I must say your offer is really very much appreciated. As you might have read or heard, we are grateful and thrilled to have this important collection, but our work and costs to catalogue and preserve it has just begun. The University can cover some costs, but we depend on donations from concerned and interested people such as yourself in order to do the major work. A donation in any amount will help us ensure that this collection is properly preserved and made accessible for future generations, and you can be proud of contributing to that. You can send a cheque to myself at the address below, and it should be made out to "University of Calgary", then mark on the front somewhere, "Gibson Collection". We will process it and then in due course, we'll send you a tax receipt. If you need any more information, please be sure to contact me at any of the addresses on this email. I will be away for a couple of weeks, but my emails and phone will tell you how to contact my Associate, Lauren Spencer, if you need to. The address for mailing is: Blane Hogue Director of Development, Information Resources Room 750, MacKimmie Library University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W. CALGARY T2N 1N4 Thanks again for your interest. Sincerely, -- Blane Hogue Director of Development, Information Resources University of Calgary

  45. A worthy cause by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered what sort of philanthropic sorts of things I would put my money into if I had an excess of wealth. Just one of those recurring daydreams we all have when sitting at our desks wishing it were lunchtime. So far, I've been unable to put my finger on one thing that just grabs me and shouts, "You must do this!" Helping stop rainforest depletion, buying up unbuilt land around my house and donating it to the regional parks, etc., all seem like obvious good causes, but somehow they just don't touch my soul.

    I have now found the calling for my money. The half mil it will take to manage this unparalleled science fiction literature collection is a drop in the bucket to preserve something so important. There are lots of people helping save the rainforests, but until now, who has looked after preserving these words that cannot be replaced? Should they be lost, they will only live in the fading memories of the people who have read them, a la Fahrenheit 451.

    As soon as I win the lottery, I'll be writing them a check. I'll probably send them money anyway, but it would be most excellent to fund it all in one fell swoop.

  46. Re:digitize? (OT) by Adrian · · Score: 1

    Didn't mean here :-)

    However, I've been involved in lots of conversations (many with technical people who should know better) of the everything-should-be-digital / its-all-different-now / librarians-know-nothing variety in the past.

    There does seem to be a tendency for some people in the technical arena to overlook/underestimate the field. I also think this lack of understanding is one of the reasons you see degrees in librarianship suddenly becoming Information Science, or variations thereof. Which I think is sad. Maybe that's just me. ... but I'm wandering off topic so I'll shutup now (off topic on /. - shame on me :-)

    Cheers,

    Adrian

  47. This William Gibson's Identity by AndrewFG · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hi - apologies for previous cut-short post; the man in question was William Robert (Bob) Gibson, a long time resident of Calgary, Alberta. He collected SF & F material, starting in the mid 1920s until he couldn't anymore, some time in 1999 or 2000. He died on Jan 8, 2001. There is lots more information at http://www.fp.ucalgary.ca/unicomm/news/gibson/

  48. Re:I wonder... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    It would explain Obi Wan. We got the whole ancestral spirit thing going there.

    I hate when I have to explain my jokes. Oh well, guess the knowledge of Lucas's influences isn't as widespread as I'd hoped. Yes, the fact that Star Wars is loosely based on Kurosawa's 1958 movie, Kakushi toride no san akunin, or "The Hidden Fortress", is no secret. Lucas even has an interview on the DVD version of this movie.

    Once you know this, then the samurai elements begin to leap out at you: why Jedi fight with swords and wear robes, why Yoda looks like an old zen master, possibly even why Leia wears cinnamon buns on her head. :)

    Of course, going from "SW is loosely based on a samurai movie" to "SW is a samurai movie" is a bit of a stretch. It's the kind of thing that could be considered funny if you're enough of a geek. Which I suppose I am -- I'm just glad that at least one moderator was geeky enough to agree. :)

  49. These aren't books. by garyrich · · Score: 2

    "This is almost certainly not the case. The idea that books turn to dust on the shelves is largely false. Even books printed on quite acidic paper will probably last for centuries (with typical research library handling frequency) if they are well looked after."

    They are not book as a rule. They are PULPS. Magazines printed on paper that would be considered low quality even by newspaper publishers. Add to that the fact that they may have color artwork that used unstable inks/dyes. Add to that that they are already old, 75+ for many. Maybe some were pH buffered by Mr. Gibson as he collected them, maybe not - the treatments are not cheap and add up fast. They will already be fragile. They are not going to take much additional handling.

    They shouldn't be cut up to scan, but they need to be scanned ASAP. On the plus side, they don't have book style binding. They should tolerate a fair amount of flattening for a good scan.

    They should be more broadly available to be read than these could possibly tolerate. A lot of that old stuff has never been reprinted (some quite desevedly :-} )and may exist only in those copies at this date.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  50. Oh, yes. Much larger. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    MITSFS has a very limited amount of space.
    If you want their collection to grow, so
    would they. Enough students asking and they
    might get better office space.

  51. Cut them up? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Why would you cut them up? Wouldn't you just have an illuminated platform onto which you would put the book, snap a picture, turn the page, etc.? Some software would find the page areas in the pictures and warp them straight in post processing? It seems like you could fairly easily build a system that an intern could operate which would generate a PDF out the other end.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  52. Re:They need $$$ to clean and preserve the materia by geekwife · · Score: 1

    What they really should do is start contacting the fan groups that put on conventions (Like BSFS here in Baltimore). Any of these groups should jump at the chance to do a charity auction to raise money to catalog the William Gibson library. ;}

    --
    "Choosy browsers choose .gif!"