Slashdot Mirror


Transgaming's WineX 2.1 - Supports WarCraft 3

friedmud writes "WineX 2.1 is out on the street, get it at transgaming.com. It boasts, among other things, full support for Warcraft III. Other games now included are: Grand Theft Auto 3, Civilization III, and Black and White. Check the press release for further info. And, if you haven't already, go here to get an account... It is definitely worth it." I've been rebooting my laptop to WC3, so maybe I'll give this a shot. I bought a subscription originally in part due to their misleading Sims compatibility claims, but this looks like it finally is truly emulating top windows games.

39 of 447 comments (clear)

  1. Games are nice, but by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about Outlook XP and M$'s Remote Desktop Client?

    Then I could secretly run Licoris at the office an nobody'd would be the wiser!

    (aaand it would keep everybody from mucking around with my workstation.)

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Games are nice, but by ag3n7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't need this to support MS's Remote Desktop Client...

      rdesktop has been doing this for a while. Try it at http://www.rdesktop.org/. I use it to connect to Windows 2000 servers and Terminal Services servers without any problems. If I remember correctly, XPs RDC is the same protocol as the aforementioned products.

      Give it a shot.

  2. Excellent news! by macpeep · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soon, there will be as many games that you can play on Linux as there are games that you can play on Macintosh!

    1. Re:Excellent news! by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Linux on the XBox: Now you aren't playing a damn thing.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  3. Oh BABY! by vandan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had been mucking with the main wine tree after reading in the Wine Weeky News that people were getting WarCraft III working under wine, but I have only been able to install and start the menu screen, which comes up MINIMIZED. Damn!

    But now WineX supports my 2 favourite games: Black & White and Warcraft III I can uninstall Windows 2k!

    I already have MS Word & Excel installed into a no-windows wine installation which works very well.

    Man, wine is starting to get really freaking good! I just wish the Wine developers and Codeweavers could get along & share code more freely with Transgaming, but they have some differing ideas about licensing. Oh well. I'm gonna save up and get that WineX. BABY!

    1. Re:Oh BABY! by Afrosheen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Keep in mind that when Transgaming has made enough money to cover all their development costs (through subscriptions etc.) they're merging all their new code back into the standard Wine tree. Eventually 95% of what they've done will be free and open source, excluding the Safedisc and other licensed protection schemes of course. Those generally aren't a problem anyway due to no-cd cracks and the like.

  4. winehq supports war3 too by uhmmmm · · Score: 4, Informative
    see here for setup details.

    warcraft 3 has worked with winehq wine as far back as the warcraft 3 beta, see this post to the wine-devel mailing list.

  5. Re:Dunno by colmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Linux has less than a 2% desktop share. Unless Linux gamers are willing to pay $500 for a native game, it's a money losing opportunity.

    The only companies who will release Linux games are those that really really rely on geek support (like Id)

    But on the bright side, just about everyone has come around to the conclusion that releasing Linux servers for their games is a good idea.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  6. Not a good open source citizen by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TransGaming has done some wonderful things. Their technology is truly helping Linux to be useful in more situations by allowing Windows games to run.

    It's really too bad that TransGaming is not a good citizen of the open source community. Their decision to keep their ActiveX libraries proprietary while happily making use of other people's work (the base Wine code) perfectly exhibits the "what's yours is mine, and what's mine is mine" abuse that BSD-like licenses can allow. And TransGaming's decision to fork the Wine code when it went LGPL is another example of this company's lack of respect for the cooperation that makes open source projects work.

    I'll support CodeWeavers but I won't support TransGaming. When you take from Wine, you give back to Wine, dammit. A balkanized Wine might provide short-term profit to TransGaming, but it delays that day in the future when all Windows software runs seamlessly on Linux.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Not a good open source citizen by colmore · · Score: 5, Interesting

      See, I totally disagree with this.

      WineX has not taken anything away from Wine. They use their code, and Wine is no worse off for it. Your criticism of TransGaming assumes that they would have written the same software if they had used the GPL. But they wouldn't have. If you want to sell software (and not support or some other intangible) you simply can't use the GPL. The only thing you can hope for is to tack a $1 surcharge on CDs shipped to people with connections to slow to download the free package.

      Profit is a motivator for innovation, like it or not. I like and fully support the GPL, but I also like and fully support some things done by better for-profit software companies. If Transgaming had been forced to GPL their work, there would be no WineX.

      "Support" good software that you want to use, in whatever form it comes in. If there's a product out there that is filling a gap, then support whatever system that created it. Linux may or may not succeed on the desktop. Linux will not succeed on the desktop with ONLY GPLed software.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    2. Re:Not a good open source citizen by eyepeepackets · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think Transgaming is a valid exception and here's why.

      Getting games to work well under Linux is a very important step and not an easy one. These folks are not trying to get rich doing this either, since they only charge $5 a month ($60.00 a year) which is about the price of one good game. All indications are they're just trying to pay their way while the work gets done.

      I subscribe and it's well worth it. I don't have to reboot to play Diablo II or Starcraft or Command and Conquer, etc. I don't have to buy special Linux specific versions of the games, the windows versions work right out of the box.

      One last point. Don't let the press release fool you into thinking only a few games are working at this point. Go to Transgaming's website, click on the games link and then on the "browse all games" link at the bottom. Any game you see listed as a 4 or 5 is working good enough to play and that's a big, big list of 4 and 5 rated games.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    3. Re:Not a good open source citizen by Ryu2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The main reason for the fork was because WineX includes reverse-engineered copy-protection support code to support games running. If Transgaming released the source code to that, it would be entirely possible to modify/hack the code so that you could play pirated games, a likely violation of the DMCA and exposing Transgaming to all sorts of legal issues. If they don't release the source code to the copy-protection, they can honesty claim that it's only an emulator, and still doesn't allow you to circumvent copy-protection. That's fine, I guess.

      But I really do agree that they really should open-up their non copy-protected related code, and make that LGPL, and back-port any (non-copy protection) improvements into the official WineHQ tree.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    4. Re:Not a good open source citizen by benmhall · · Score: 4, Insightful
      " The main reason for the fork was because WineX includes reverse-engineered copy-protection support code to support games running. If Transgaming released the source code to that, it would be entirely possible to modify/hack the code so that you could play pirated games, a likely violation of the DMCA and exposing Transgaming to all sorts of legal issues. "

      While this is true, it doesn't explain why they threatended Debian to change their license when someone proposed packaging the CVS version into a .DEB file. Turns out that packaging the source is permitted under the license at the moment, but as soon as someone does they'll close that door.

      More info:

      http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-d evel-200205/msg02823.html

      Sorry, these guys aren't great OSS citizens, no way around it. Hey, whatever happened to releasing the code after 10,000 people signed up? Does that still hold? Have they posted numbers on how close they are?

      And none of this "shut up and pay your $15" garbage. I've bought plenty of OSS and non-OSS software (including VMWare and CodeWeaver's stuff) Transgaming is trying to look nice and open, but they're not. If they want to keep things closed, that's fine. What's not fine is saying one thing and doing another. As it is, the sources are mostly free but only as long as they're a pain to install. What good is that for people who don't know what CVS is?

      Ben

  7. Ooooh, support for a Blizzard game! by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess since they're not stifling compatability with DMCA lawsuits this week, it's ok to spend $70 (CDN) on their software and fund their lawyers! Thanks anyways...I'll keep my WineX subscription, but I'll only buy games from developers that don't screw us.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
    1. Re:Ooooh, support for a Blizzard game! by Elbereth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's this "us"? Blizzard hasn't screwed me. Maybe they screwed you. But don't speak for me.

    2. Re:Ooooh, support for a Blizzard game! by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, silly. Dr. Taco is asking you to STEAL their software! thus no profits for antichrist and many funs for yourself its a happy world for everyone!

  8. Rumors from Redmond by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny


    I hear the MS guys are making a Linux emulator for Win32. It's called Beer 3.2. The reasoning is, Beer is more popular than Wine so it will appeal to a broader user base. Women tend to like Wine better but Men overwhelmingly prefered Beer in product testing. Beer 3.2 is still a beta, and will be released when it's content reaches version 5.0.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Rumors from Redmond by Cryptnotic · · Score: 5, Funny

      If it's from Microsoft, there is no way it will be free. Accordingly, will the open source movement need to stop using the phrase, "free as in beer"?

      Maybe we can convince Microsoft to name their product "Lunch". That way, everyone will automatically realize that there is no such thing as a "free Lunch".

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  9. Re:WarCraft 3? by colmore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For novice players, it is pretty much the same thing, only smaller armies (which is a good thing in my opinion)

    In really competitive play, it actually plays quite differently from Starcraft, C&C, WC2, or Dune 2. The hero system really rewards micromanagement, and rushes aren't quite what they've been in the past. If you sit down and try to play WC3 like Starcraft, you'll lose pretty quickly. Warcraft 3 is not paced at all like previous RTSes.

    However, these are deep, play-balance innovations. The overall format of the game is pretty much Warcraft 2 with smaller armies and stronger units.

    What I would really like to see is a RTS (and shouldn't these games be called Real Time Tactics, the scale is a bit small to really be called "strategy" in the military sense) of WWII's Pacific theater, done at about Starcraft Scale. Storm beaches, knock out gun fortifications, take over islands, clear out airstrips, etc. It could be really interesting, and it wouldn't have any of that base-building nonsense (you don't train new soldiers and research new technology on the battlefield). Or play the Japanese side and try to defend.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  10. Transgaming contributes to ReWind by gatesh8r · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And you can't always expect that everyone's going to cough up code for free. Wine was under an X licnece and gave you the option of making the code proprietary ("more free" as BSD people would put it). This is what the X licence was designed to allow. Deal with it.

    OTOH, Transgaming and WineHQ have been trying to figure out ways so that TG can give kickbacks to WineHQ in terms of code.

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  11. Re:Dunno by quantaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually WineX is a very good idea for supporting Linux. Even in the rare cases where linux is still on the desktop most people maintain a windows partition for gaming. Something like WoneX will allow them to move over to pure linux. This wil help spread linux, you CAN use all your M$ software still and you get all this all this great other linux stuff, you haev nothing to lose! Furthermore as more people start to use WineX and like products the game manufacturers will start to notice this market share and try to make sure their game doesn't do anything cookey (did I spell that right) that would make it unusable under WineX. As this happens linux becomes more popular and continues to grow in market share until finally companies find they can get an edge by offering native linux games instead of stuff running over a compatibility layer. Now you get you linux games, I very much believe Wine and WineX are one of the best weapons linux has to take the desktop.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  12. Wasn't Blizzard _Evil_? by thunderbee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm at a loss here. WarCraft III? After the bnetd business? Hmm. Blizzard must be like Sony: we only boycott them between product releases.
    It's a bit sad. I guess this in some way shows how we will never win against corporations. The average person here seems to hold on to his principles until shown a new toy.
    I have little faith in humanity; so it's not like I am disapointed, but I can't help but being mad at those who can't seem to stick to their own principles for more than a few minutes...

    --
    In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  13. I only wish by Brijam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just wish the same level of effort went in to providing compatibility for Windows apps that are desperately needed on the Linux desktop -- like Quicken.

    Games are important, but Linux is still seriously lacking in the finance department. Getting Quicken to work it would do more for long term usability of the OS.

  14. EMULATING top windows games? by Anarchofascist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...emulating top windows games...

    #Wine Is Not an Emulator.
    s/emulating/supporting

    #If Wine gets good enough, we won't even have
    #to call them windows games anymore.

    --
    Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more, Or close the wall up with our American dead!
  15. Re:Just what Linux needs by Elbereth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have you looked at what's available for the Mac? All Blizzard games are hybrid now, plus most OpenGL games have been ported. That's about ten times as many (good) games as Linux. All you really need is Diablo II, Civ 3, and Unreal Tournament, anyways.

    It's too bad that Blizzard doesn't like Linux, but that's why I bought a Mac.

  16. Does it finally work with SCSI CD-ROM drives? by Wee · · Score: 3, Informative
    I paid for a subscription when I first heard about WineX. That was last year about this time, and my subscription has run out. I had hoped that WineX would take the place of Loki going down (or not releasing patches or new games -- same thing), but WineX is not a good replacement for a native port if you have certain hardware, namely SCSI CD-ROM/CD-R(W) drives.

    WineX will not work with SCSI drives and copy-protected CDs. Every new release has something about how SCSI support has improved, is fixed, etc, but it never seems to work. If you check their forums you'll see what I mean. Most every issue is marked "fixed", with the solution seemingly always being a symlink or some such. It's not fixed as of the last release.

    Does anyone know if they got it fixed this time? I tried to check the release notes at http://downloads.transgaming.com/files/winex-2_1-r eleasenotes.txt, but got a 500 error (on a .txt file no less). If the SCSI issues are fixed, then I'm gladly subscribing again. If not, I'm saving my money and keeping my new dual-boot setup.

    If you have SCSI drives, make sure you investigate this before giving them any money or you'll likely have paid for nothing. I don't think SCSI support is real high on their support list. It's been broken for almost a year, after all...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  17. my subscription lapsed last week by _|()|\| · · Score: 5, Interesting
    TransGaming now Supports Over 80 PC Games
    Issued on Wednesday April 17, 2002

    Play Warcraft III on Linux with TransGaming's Release of WineX 2.1
    Issued on Thursday August 1, 2002

    TransGaming subscriptions cost $5 per month, with a minimum three months payment.

    It's been just over three months since the last major release. Coincidence?

    1. Re:my subscription lapsed last week by zCyl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's been just over three months since the last major release. Coincidence?

      If there were a grand conspiracy, you could thwart them by paying $20 and subscribing for 4 months, after which you could then bellow a menacing laugh.

  18. Yes, EMULATING top windows games... by dinivin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wine is an emulator...

    emulate

    1. To strive to equal or excel, especially through imitation: an older pupil whose accomplishments and style I emulated.
    2. To compete with successfully; approach or attain equality with.
    3. Computer Science. To imitate the function of (another system), as by modifications to hardware or software that allow the imitating system to accept the same data, execute the same programs, and achieve the same results as the imitated system.

    Just because I claim not to be a 26 year old male doesn't mean that I'm not 26 year old male. Just because WINE claims not to be an emulator doesn't mean that it's not an emulator.

  19. Clarification, please Rob... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...due to their misleading Sims compatibility claims....
    Rob, would you please clarify and expand upon that statement? To me, it seems just a bit inflammatory to make a statement like that without some backup as to why you feel that way.
  20. little offtopic but it's still about games. by Twister002 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not roll your own with FreeCraft?

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
  21. Re:Just what Linux needs by LatJoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Diablo II, Civ 3, and Unreal Tournament should be enough for anyone"

    -- Elbereth, 2002

    Do those games run with 640K?

  22. Re:this looks like it finally is truly emulating by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have an interesting point. About the only thing that tempts me to use Windows 2000 anymore is the beauty of MOH:AA (That game is just too great). Linux support for it is pretty sucky under Wine.

    We all knoew that the OpenGL implementations in Linux are excellent. What is holding developers back from spending a little extra time to release unsupported Linux binaries? It is kinda disappointing. A week or two of coding can produce more game sales. What is the problem here?

    I like the concepts of Wine and will probably subscribe to Transgaming for WineX, but what does this leave use with? It is just a temporary alternative to proper Linux binaries that run correctly. I don't want Wine to become an excuse for the developers lack of interest in multi-platform software.

    Wine is nice, but it will never be as good as the real thing, unless we have more acess to the native Windows code. Microsoft knows this, and it is what makes it really difficult to develop proper libraries for running Windows software.

  23. Re:WarCraft 3? by sjbe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I would really like to see is a RTS (and shouldn't these games be called Real Time Tactics, the scale is a bit small to really be called "strategy" in the military sense) of WWII's Pacific theater...

    The difference between strategy and tactics has little to do with scale. They are very different concepts.

    Strategy is a game plan. It's how you intend to accomplish some goal. (i.e. I plan to use airstrikes to cripple my opponent's tanks before sending in the ground troops) Strategy doesn't necessarily imply that it is military either. Business has strategy. Sports have strategy. Strategy is just an approach to a problem.

    Tactics on the other hand are the actual methods used to carry out a strategy. (i.e. The F-15's fly X route through the mountains dropping their bombs in Y location) Tactics are the details. The precise method by which you carry out each part of the overall strategy.

    Strategy and Tactics go hand in hand but scale really isn't what defines them. They are separate parts of a solution process. Calling the games RTS games is fine and correct, even though every game has strategy to some degree. Even kill-everything games like Quake have strategy, just not especially deep ones most of the time.

  24. Re:Dunno by ceswiedler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And linux is not an operating system, it's a kernel. So what? Do we have to be that pedantic?

  25. Anal analysis of an assumption by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Using Wine to run something like PowerDVD you can have the best of both worlds - Linux and legal DVDs.
    You think that watching a DVD with PowerDVD is legal? You have no proof as to the truth of that, even when you run it under Windows. The MPAA could take you to court for watching a DVD with PowerDVD, and when they ask you, "Did you have the copyright holder's authorization to bypass CSS?" the only answer you'll have is, "Um, I don't know. Do I have your authorization?" If they're already after you for some other reason (such as "constantly trying to piss off the various copyright holder corporations") when they'll just say No, and the trial is over.

    It is suspected (but not known) that this authorization is somehow conditional upon using tools licensed by DVDCCA. But DVDCCA also apparently have severe technical restrictions they impose upon their licensees, such as obeying region restrictions, macrovision-encoding video output, and not haveing firewire outputs. So you really think that using a DVD player application in an alien environment (a Windows emulator) is going to be within those restrictions? If so, then your faith is strong indeed!

    There is little reason to believe that using PowerDVD is more legal than using applications that use libcss.

    The only thing that makes it legal or not, is whether or not you have their permission. In the end, their agreements with third parties such a DVDCCA or the company who made a computer application or an electronic appliance for watching DVDs, are irrelevant. What matters is what agreement that have with you. And you don't have a single scrap of evidence to support any claim that you have permission to watch any DVD that you own. The most obvious evidence -- that they sold you the DVD and therefore you obviously have implicit permission -- has already been shot down by Kaplan.

    Effort expended on playing DVDs "legally", is a waste of time. As long as DMCA remains law and DVDs do not come with EULAs that give people permission to watch or explain conditions under which they have permission to watch, it will never be provably legal for anyone to watch a CSS-protected DVD. It doesn't matter if you use xine, PowerDVD, or a Sony DVD player.

    If you are "constantly trying to piss off the various copyright holder coorporations" then you have to give up DVDs altogether. Because if they really do get pissed off at you, they can nail you on this technicality. And the 2600 case proves they are willing.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Anal analysis of an assumption by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can't touch me with the DMCA for two reasons:
      1) I don't live in the US
      2) Denmark doesn't turns over its citizens for breaking US laws while staying in Denmark

      What I _AM_ worried about is the comming legislation in Denmark and the EU (http://www.fs.dk/uk/acts/eu/pdf/opin_en.pdf) that will make it illegal for me to basicly do anything with a program designed for circumventing copy protection (and thus CSS), using libCSS could be illigal, whereas a program like PowerDVD is limited to 5 settings, and is using a licensed CSS-key, which is the same as the copyright holders signing a permission. If I were to use a pirated version of PowerDVD on the other hand ...

      Also, I'm not just blowing smoke out my ass with my "trying to piss off the various copyright holder coorporations", although "constantly" is a bit of a stretch, as I'm only on my second attempt so far, with the first one being rather successfull in Denmark, stirring up quite a debate :-)

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  26. Re:Full Support? by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

    pah! how many native windows games can you give a 5 out of 5 reliability rating running under Windows?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  27. A WINE future timeline. by michaelsimms · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why is it that WINE is greeted with such enthusiasm by those it is damaging?

    Has anyone that supports WINE actually given a thought to what happens if this is the way things go? Let me once again state the blindingly obvious timeline that WINE leads us to

    1) WINE improves its windows emulation, more games work under Linux than ever before.
    2) Development of native Linux games is pretty much destroyed by WINE emulation because the few porting companies struggling to survive at this early stage cannot hope to keep up with dozens of well funded windows development companies.
    3) Emulated games become the norm. By definition they are slower than native, less reliable, but we can sacrifice reliability because we can play games NOW!
    4) As Linux games are all now emulated, sales figures for Linux games are all showing up as Windows sales. Linux sales figures effectively become zero, giving no incentive for any software company to produce native ports.
    5) Microsoft, who though evil are damned clever with their lawyers, finds a nice little legal way to kill WINE, through a patent issue, or some DMCA clone or who knows. WINE development stops.
    6) New games stop running on Linux because WINE cant support DirectX 12 or whatever the latest version is. Nobody thinks to worry about it in the game development companies because Linux sales figures are zero (see 4).
    7) Linux gets less games that will work. The companies that busted their balls trying to make native Linux gaming viable, companies like Tux Games, Loki and LGP have all long since gone.
    8) With nobody left to support Linux gaming, Linux gaming dies.
    9) With no new games, Linux desktop becomes less attractive and people happily move back to windows so they can play the latest games NOW (see 3)
    10) Bill Gates sends thankyou letter to Transgaming and other WINE supporters.

    Any questions?

    Sure I am a biased party. That is because by founding Tux Games, I have put my money where my mouth is and bet the whole house on native Linux because unlike Transgaming, I BELIEVE THAT LINUX DOES NOT NEED TO USE WINDOWS AS A CRUTCH AND THAT LINUX IS A DAMNED FINE OS IN ITS OWN RIGHT..

    Note: Tux Games has been offered time and again, the opportunity to carry Transgaming games. We are well aware that if we did so, we would make more money, but we STRONGLY believe in the above timeline threat, and so we put our morals where our mouth is and stand by Linux native. Want to do the same? Then dont inflate Windows sales figures, support those that are working all hours to bring YOU new products.

    --

    Tux Games. Your complete source for native Linux games.