Slashdot Mirror


A Maglev Train System for Florida?

Artifice_Eternity writes "For 20 years, citizens of Florida have been pushing for high-speed rail, as an alternative to the state's ever-growing, yet ever-crowded highways. A previous plan, the Florida Overland eXpress (FOX), was killed by governor Jeb Bush in 1998. The voters responded by passing a referendum to require the building of a "bullet train," starting by November 2003. The new Florida High Speed Rail Authority is focusing first on the busy Miami-Orlando and Tampa-Orlando corridors, but eventually hopes to serve the whole state. And they are seriously considering maglev technology! If the Florida HSR system did use maglev, it would be the largest one in the world. (Right now, maglev is in use on test tracks in Germany and Japan, with a 30-kilometer system under construction in Shanghai.) However, I like this humorous proposal best: it takes the idea of a "bullet train" literally, using the Jules Verne approach to propulsion."

12 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. I4 by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would be nice if they would run it along I4 (which they probably will, since it's the main artery from Tampa to Orlando)... traffic there is horrible.

    Assuming it's not too expensive to ride, I would see it getting alot of business from us college students in Orlando who have family along the routes... gas isn't exactly cheap for a 400 mile drive one way

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  2. Re:Futuristic Trains in Central Florida by rtphokie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Disney abondoned in thoughts of running a monorail between it's property and the Orlando airport when they realized it would be way to slow. They supported the maglev high speed train project that was to run between the airport and EPCOT (with connecting service to Disney hotels via bus and monorail) right up until the point that a stop at Universal/I-drive was also added to the plans. Disney got real uncooperative at that point. Their goal is to keep visitors (and their $$$) on Disney property.

  3. Re:Pushing? by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "Well I live in FL and trust me, it's not the citizens that are pushing for a highspeed rail system! It's the congressmen and the Disney folks. They want to run a rail for "us", yet it would only really serve to get tourists to and from hotels and attractions."


    Nonsense. I remember signing the petition to have the issue put on the ballot. I remember voting on it. I remember it being passed.


    Here in FL, with enough signatures, any issue (as long as it deals with a single point) can be put on the ballot. Any issue. This was one of them. It wasn't like big money bought the signatures and bought the voters.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  4. One more link.. by dizco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Off-duty troopers, hired at $30 an hour, picked motorists at random and directed them to pull off the interstate into a rest stop, where Palm Pilot- toting interviewers waited. "

    That's how florida's high-speed rail authority recently choose to gauge public interest in riding the high speed train.

    1. Re:One more link.. by BitGeek · · Score: 3, Interesting



      When exactly was it that cops stopped being responsible for public safety and became agents of the state?

      Have you noticed that people don't even expect cops to do things relating to public safety anymore? ITs just a foregone conclusion that they are the state's bullies-- there to harass drivers, or bust drugs (which has nothing to do with public safety) or provide protection, or run interference for politicos and corporations (such as blocking traffic, or providing "security" which is really just armed enforcement, without the checks or balances of the law.)

      When was the last time a cop shot an innocent person and went to jail for it? I can't think of any... seems they do that once a month here in Seattle and are never brought up on charges, let alone serve time.

      Hell on TV they don't even try to portray cops as working for any kind of objectivity-- they are always working for the prosecution. Notice that? It wouldn't be so bad if they were genreally trustworthy, but its been widely reported the hundreds of cases where the state forensice expert cooked the evidence (Where was that? Missouri? Maryland?) For decade he was doing this.

      Its time to get rid of the police part of the police state-- let private security agencies represent us and defend us-- and make everyone equal under the law. (And no more agents of the state getting first crack at the evidence so they can tamper with it. Completely lacks objectivity that.)

      Thanks for listening to my rant. while I was born in the south, I left after I realized just how corrupt the states are.. Florida, LA, Miss, Texas-- hell cops were drowning people in Brayes Bayou and shooting them, while drunk, on the freeway when I left Texas (and of course, no charges are filed.)

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    2. Re:One more link.. by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      When was the last time a cop shot an innocent person and went to jail for it? I can't think of any... seems they do that once a month here in Seattle and are never brought up on charges, let alone serve time.

      Police officers are not part of the general populace when they've got their badge on, and are held to a different standard of accountability, not unlike the code that soliders have to follow.

      Here in NY state, there was a spark a while back about a black man named Diallo who got shot down by officers. After a trial (that got moved upstate to right here in Albany), the officers were absolved of their charges--the jury found that they really did think that this was their man, and they really did think that he was pulling a gun.

      'course, they all probably got written up internally for "excessive use of force," and each and every one of those cops has to live with the knowledge that they killed an innocent... I would be surprised if none of the officers took some psychiatric aid, and if they're all still working at NYPD.

      (A google search, btw, lists over 54k results for "Cop goes to jail".)

      For the most part, police officers who go to trial go quietly, and I suspect that many of them plead guilty--who the hell wants to life with "bad cop" floating around in the general conciousness attached to their face?

      Its time to get rid of the police part of the police state-- let private security agencies represent us and defend us-- and make everyone equal under the law. (And no more agents of the state getting first crack at the evidence so they can tamper with it. Completely lacks objectivity that.)

      That's wrong on so many levels...
      1. Placing security into "private" hands means security only for the rich. I can barely afford health insurance and keep a car on the road--how the hell am I going to find money to pay for a security service?
      2. There's a cliche about people paying for "security." And it's attached to the mob. It doesn't seem that far a step from "everyone pays someone to protect them" to "everyone pays someone not to beat them up."
      3. What makes you think that private agents would be any *MORE* trustworthy than state agents? Most forensic units are looking for the truth, not a conviction, mostly because reductions in crime make their neighborhoods safer and their jobs easier.


      Thanks for listening to my rant. while I was born in the south, I left after I realized just how corrupt the states are.. Florida, LA, Miss, Texas-- hell cops were drowning people in Brayes Bayou and shooting them, while drunk, on the freeway when I left Texas (and of course, no charges are filed.)

      So, you're a witness to police getting drunk and murdering someone? Call the local DA right now--there's no statute of limiations on murder. Oh, that DA's corrupt? Then call them first, and then the FBI. Oh, you didn't see it firsthand? Then have your friend who did call.

      Oh, wait--you mean you didn't actually see it, and you don't know anyone who did? Then it's heresay, gossip, and not enough to build any kind of case whatsoever. It probably didn't happen, or if it did it was resolved internally and no one bothered to tell you because it's none of your damn business.

      Sorry about the counter-rant; knee-jerk antiestablishmentism irks me greatly, especially coming from people who don't get out and do anything about it.
  5. Re:Pushing? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny
    It wasn't like big money bought the signatures and bought the voters.
    Why buy votes in Florida when you can buy Unauditable Voting Machines?
  6. Re:Pushing? by lollipop17 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was going to moderate this story, but I hate it when folks living in south Florida think they are the whole state. There are some people left that live north of I-4 and the turnpike and see money taken out of their pocket for a project only benefiting those that live on or south of it. If you don't live south of Ocala, naturally I'll eat my own shorts, but big money didn't have to buy the signatures- there are plenty enough ignorant people living here to naively think a high-speed rail would benefit them despite their living in say, Tallahassee.

    I will say, you are certainly correct in your second paragraph, I just don't think you can convince me that because it was introduced via petition that certain mouse-eared companies had nothing to do with sponsoring said petition.

    Jacksonville has a monorail system that is not used becuase it currently only benefits one small portion of a very spread-out city, and the voters won't throw any more money at it to expand the service because of the perception that it won't benefit them- I guess I just don't want to see that happen in this case. Traveling in south florida is a pain, what with all the tolls and everything, anything to relieve that would be nice.

    --

    Be a moderator, not a brick.
  7. Re:Pushing? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Absolutely. This will be 1000 times worse than the Florida Aquarium, Tampa Taxpayer's Stadium, and the Tampa Bay Devil Rays combined. Nobody will ride it. Well, not nobody. But very few people. Tourists, not residents.

    The problem isn't getting between Tampa and Orlando. The problem is getting from the rail station to where you need to go. Mass transit in Florida is nearly worthless to anyone except the poor or the martyrs. I can drive to work in 15 minutes, but to take a bus I have to walk/bike 3 miles, switch buses twice, then walk another mile. It's 2 hours each way.

    I'm sure there will be Disney and hotel shuttles though.

    The solution (if you refuse to finance and offer incentives for mass transit) is better roads. We still have plenty of clover-style on/off-ramps where onramp traffic has to cross over offramp traffic. We have way too short merge lanes at critical spots. Crap, we have a right-angle bend on a two-lane offramp that many drivers take at 50mph+. A gas tanker flipped and burned there recently, trashing the overpass for months. Do these engineers drive?

    If we'd just yank the license of anyone with a 3" tailpipe on a Civic and blondes with BMWs, I'd shave 2 hours off my commute time every week.

  8. Re:Pushing? by mc6809e · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For every penny the government spends on a project like this, someone is getting work, a job, etc.

    This is such a common myth. Where does the money come from to pay for this? From taxpayers. What would most taxpayers do with this money if they were allowed to keep it? Spend it -- "someone wouldbe getting work, a job, etc."

    The effect of taxes is to merely change the kind of work that will be done. And this work is for the benefit of the five largest cities and not for the rest of the state.

    Taxes don't create jobs, they merely change the kind of jobs that will be done.

  9. Re:Pushing? by mc6809e · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nonsense. I remember signing the petition to have the issue put on the ballot. I remember voting on it. I remember it being passed.

    Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...

    Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!

    All: Monorail!
    Monorail!
    Monorail!

  10. Re:Scotty, I need more POWER!!!!!! by Turing+Machine · · Score: 3, Informative

    the magnets required to keep a train aloft would be gigantic.

    Not really. Google on "halbach magnet" and "inductrack". It can be done with quite modest permanent magnets (comparatively speaking). No superconductors or electric power needed!