Slashdot Mirror


Danger Device Reviewed

Andonyx writes "There's already a review out on Zdnet regarding Danger's Hiptop PDA / Phone device. It looks very interesting and the review is mostly positive. It has some minor niggles, but concludes that it is a compelling and polished first gen offering."

54 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. Broken Link by bigethespe · · Score: 2, Informative

    www.danger.com for product info http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories/story/0,10 738,2877183,00.html for the review

  2. Funny... by T3kno · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I hit Reply to post this comment about a broken link there is a little tag line that reads (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!). Just an observation =)

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  3. Check your Links by avalys · · Score: 2, Funny

    Link is bad.

    If the editors keep neglecting to check these, someday we'll end up with one that points to goatse.cx .

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  4. Try a correct link: by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Informative
  5. Almost got it...went XDA instead by dada21 · · Score: 2

    I've been a voicestream user for over a year, working with the ultimately too-buggy and breakable Motorola V.100. The Pocket PC Phone XDA had come out, so I was in between buying a full fledged PDA to replace my 2nd Ipaq (first one screen broke), or going with this device.

    I'm glad I went with the XDA. One week now and I've had no problems that the reviewers all had. I've installed all my old ipaq software, downloaded a crapload of MP3's (to a 256MB SD card), even downloaded an mpeg movie which is quite watchable even on the smaller screen.

    This pseudo-useful device definitely has its place, but it looked way too similiar to my v.100 in many ways, and I wanted a color screen with a useable resolution. For a few hundred bucks more ($300 or so) I was able to get a fully fledged PDA (albeit running MS OS) and a great phone, all in one.

    No unlimited data on my end, though. Voicestream's data packages are ludicrously expensive... 5MB of data for $20 a month, ouch.

  6. What's in a name... by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now there's a PDA that Steve Irwin would be happy to use.

    Danger, danger, danger!
    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    1. Re:What's in a name... by delus10n0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hah! You rock. Crocodile Hunter++

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  7. ZDnet today by Astrorunner · · Score: 5, Funny

    What does it tell you about ZDnet, when the advertisement in the middle of the article is five times bigger than the picture of the item in question?

  8. Crotchtop PDA by cioxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's right. You heard it there first © 2002

    A small device attaches itself to your genitals. The early concept model is still in development, hence I cannot release the full feature details. But I must stress the fact that it uses recycled energy whenever there is friction involved. It comes standard with Anu-Tooth, which is the modified version of blootooth module and plugs right into the crack.

  9. Imagine a beo... but seriously folks by Bozar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    from the article

    "I was very impressed with the speed of the AOL IM client, but was disappointed that it was the only IM option offered pre-loaded on the device. While I expect that MSN Messenger and Yahoo Messenger will be supported in the future, for now, you're out of luck if you use either of them."

    I hope they move to something more extensible like jabber or trillian. However AIM is the de-facto standard so it isn't such a big loss.

    Also, in another section of the article he comments negatively on the camera add on... ITS A FREAKIN PHONE! IMHO the communications should come first (which they apparently do) and the nifty stuff that you wouldn't use much (camera) second. However, adding a quality digital camera to one of these PDA/Phone things would be extremely useful... enough that i might actually get one!

    But then again there is the constant tradeoff between battery, cost, and quality. In mobile devices you have to pay for every little bit, so you better make sure its worth putting in.

    The article doesn't say anything about the hackability of this gadget. Does anyone have any knowledge of that?

    --
    Free as in *BUUURP!*
  10. Picture? by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would it kill them to put a larger-than-thumbnail picture of the thing up with the review?

    1. Re:Picture? by jimmcq · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Picture? by Catskul · · Score: 2

      The picture of the phone/PDA was taken with the camera add on for the phone/PDA : )

      --

      Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    3. Re:Picture? by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the replies. I had no problem finding pictures on my own, however. My point was that a basic part of a product review, and especially a cool-new-gadget review, should be a clear picture of the iteam.

  11. How to get one for free! by BigBir3d · · Score: 4, Funny

    For "testing" of course. Go here.

  12. 24-bit color by Non-Newtonian+Fluid · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Wow," I though, "that's pretty good," until I noticed that it applied not to the PDA's screen, but rather to it's "illuminated LED push-wheel." Please tell me why I need a scroll wheel capable of blinking in 16.7 million different colors.

    1. Re:24-bit color by cosyne · · Score: 2

      Please tell me why I need a scroll wheel capable of blinking in 16.7 million different colors.

      Preach on. My sorry colorblind eyes have enough trouble with the 1-bit color redgreen LED on my Treo. (anyone working on a blink-rate hack?)

    2. Re:24-bit color by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      One bit I read quite awhile back noted that the screen can be detatched and, it seems, replaced. Sure - this enables a quick replacement for what seems like the most damage-prone component. But there is also speculation and rumor over a color screen replacement in the works.

      As for the scrollwheel... I suspect its cheaper than a full color LCD screen. :P

    3. Re:24-bit color by potuncle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know this has barely anything to do with the Danger device, but your message plants a valid point.

      I have the relatively common male red-green color blindness. It isn't severe, and is most noticable with those red/green LED's. The color blindness I have only affects certian wavelengths and those are the wavelenths LED designers seem to have choosen. (I know there were severe limitations on the colors LED's could be, but that issue seems to no longer exist).

      This drives me crazy on hubs, routers, and other equiptment that use dual-colored LED's. I have hacked into many devices and had to replace these LED's with either 2 seperate ones or using some dual colored yellow/blue LED's. Even if someone was completely color blind they would be able to tell the difference since the blue is signifigantly dimmer than the yellow.

      It's about time that manufacturers make indicators that can be correctly viewed by the color-blind and not require them to perform warranty breaking hacks...or always having to ask someone "is this thingy red or green?"

      Sorry about the rant...

    4. Re:24-bit color by Myco · · Score: 2

      May I suggest something? Procure a piece of green cellophane and a piece of red cellophane. View said LED in its different states through each piece of cellophane in turn. Seems like the light would be discernably different when you filter it like this. And you only have to ask someone else which color is which one time, when you buy the cellophane (just don't get them mixed up! Sharpie is your friend).

  13. It needs... by Bartab · · Score: 2

    More memory (16 megs is pathetic) and an ogg player. Even if it had that, I'd wait for the color version.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    1. Re:It needs... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2

      It also needs a much higher res display (like the new sony one). And needs to be much thinner to be usefull to me. Unless it fits comfortably in my pocket, I'm not interested.

  14. Nothing special by jukal · · Score: 4, Funny
    It was a nice presentation on their website, here. The thing does not have anything special, and it is not sold now. Most main cell/pda makers will publish similar things within 6 months, I believe. Danger, I quess, just has to go public sooner.

    Or was there anything else fancy, than the market speech, that I missed?

    1. Re:Nothing special by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or was there anything else fancy, than the market speech, that I missed?
      Unlimited data transfer for $39.9 a month.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Nothing special by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      That doesn't seem to have anything to do with the Hiptop, though.

    3. Re:Nothing special by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      My point is that it doesn't make sense for different devices to have different plans. Packets are packets. (And I wonder what happens if you sign up for the Hiptop plan and put the SIM card in a different device.)

    4. Re:Nothing special by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Packets are not packets over cell phone networks, either. AOL Messaging does not take the same form as a tcp/ip connection over cellphones.

      That sounds like a bug, since history shows that IP beats everything else. But I don't feel like arguing.

  15. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hiptop wowed Tycho from Penny Arcade.

    That should be all the press it needs.

    Is this that guerilla marketing /. was referring to earlier?

    --
    [o]_O
  16. Sprint just launched their 3G phone by Animats · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    It sends and receives still color pictures (although the camera is not built into the phone). But data transmission is $20 per megabyte. Ulp.

    Danger has flat-rate data pricing. Still, I wonder what Danger does if you plug in a camera and use it as a webcam, saturating the network.

    The integrated phone/camera has interesting potential if the data cost problem can be overcome.

  17. wtf by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2, Funny

    It has some minor niggles...


    Niggles? Wtf does that mean? Should I be offended?

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:wtf by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Niggles? Wtf does that mean? Should I be offended?

      No. A person who uses the phrase "What the fuck" in casual conversation should not be offended by any form of verbal communication.

      And 'niggles' is a fairly common term meaning "minor reservations", similar to 'speckles' meaning "tiny pieces".

      --
      Evan (no reference)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  18. Give me More! by RedElf · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's right, I want more, more devices to carry around, wouldn't feel like a proper geek without lugging around more, a Huge watch, a Big Multipurpose Controller for Tv's, Vcrs, DVds, etc. (Hey you won't get stuck watching anything you don't want to now!), A Very Large Palm pilot, A 22lb Laptop, and a few misc. other devices that weight quite a bit, but make me look more geeky.

    --
    You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!
    1. Re:Give me More! by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      good point. there is an upside, though, to all the gadgets a super geek may find themselves with. All that extra weight may actually be good for your health and daily excercise. Someday muscles may be a distinguishing charateristic for geeks.

      course, I don't own a watch. and I'm still thinking over whether or not to get a pda. :)

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  19. NOT 3G wireless == useless in 6 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not 3G wirless if they're with T-mobile.

    Also, dollars to doughnuts that the cellular aspect is T-mobile and EVERYTHING else (web, email, spyware...oops!) is their proprietary network.

    How useful and cool is that going to be if I can't run my webserver from my hip?

    I think getting a device compatible with Sprint's Vision (their 3G wireless solution) would be a much better deal.

    1. Re:NOT 3G wireless == useless in 6 months? by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its not 3G wireless unless their with NTT DoCoMo, or possibly SK Telecom. This should be compatable with AT&T Wireless, Cingular & T-Mobile, even after their upgrades. I don't think it will be compatable after they upgrade to UMTS, but that is still a long way off. It won't be compatable with Verizon Wireless, Sprint PCS, or Nextel, unless they have a CDMA version in the works. Of the regonals I know of, AllTel, CellularOne, and I'd assume CenturyTel won't work either.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:NOT 3G wireless == useless in 6 months? by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 2

      Actually, Nextel uses iDEN, which is a variant of TDMA, not CDMA.

      --

      I disable sigs...do you?
    3. Re:NOT 3G wireless == useless in 6 months? by Cato · · Score: 2

      Nextel are migrating to CDMA, because iDEN is a Motorola only standard without much of a future.

  20. the thing that scares me about by prisoner · · Score: 2

    this "crotch top" pda is that it "attaches itself"(!) Look ma! no hands! Watch while this small robot pda crawls down my pants and wraps itself around my mule...'course, if you're a woman it might be a bit more.....invasive...:)

  21. Delays, delays, delays by RedX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Danger started releasing info on this device last year, and they've had nothing but delays since. It looked like a very promising device at the time, but it has been caught and passed by other mobile devices since. Had they met their original launch date of April, they'd have been early to market and wouldn't have had the egg on their face that they have today. It was then pushed to June, then to July, then was an early-August release up until a week or two ago when it was again delayed at the last minute. So it now supposedly comes out in September, while in the meantime customers who have been waiting for the device have likely moved on to non-vapor devices.

  22. any possibility... by shren · · Score: 2

    any possibility of telnet or ssh (preferably the latter) on one of these things?

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    1. Re:any possibility... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      I did a bit of research on this this morning. I found out about it from the Penny Arcade mention - the artist saw a friend of his with a working model, taking pictures and updating his blog with it. The friend worked for the company that developed it, and was none other than Ficus Kirkpatrick, one of the hackers behind the BeOS kernel. Anybody know where his blog might be found?

      --
      Evan (no reference)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:any possibility... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2

      Found it. --
      Evan (no reference)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  23. Re:How does this compare to the Nokia Communicator by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 2

    Definitely. Until you realize that the Danger Device is MSRP $200USD, and the Noia 9290 is MSRP $599USD.

  24. I applied... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

    ...and all I got was a lousy sticker offer.

    Not even a tshirt.

  25. The camera isn't integrated... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

    It's an add-on. And a kinda clunky one, from the looks of it. Just thought I'd mention it.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  26. Re:A "Hip-Hop" PDA? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    > our common heritage as children of God

    I'm not a child of God, unless you can pull some birth records or DNA tests that proove otherwise.

    BTW, how on earth can you deride identity politics and then participate in them in the very next sentance? I hope you can spot the irony.

    I also hope you can spot that its "HipTop" and not "HipHop".

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  27. They already missed the boat by sh0rtie · · Score: 2


    It seems as if they have come way to late to market with this phone , sure they might sell a few units, but compared to the tech Japan's 3G I-Mode and Europe's devices this all-in-one is a glorified calculator

    Lets look at the competition

    Nokia 7650
    Integrated digital camera,
    picture taking and sending, MMS (Multimedia Messaging Service), photo album for storing pictures, GPRS, an advanced user interface, downloadable personal applications via Java(TM) technology, joystick navigation and a color display

    Sony Ericcson T68i
    Bluetooth(TM) ,Built-in modem ,Calendar,Contacts
    E-mail (POP3 & IMAP4),Game, MMS (Multimedia Messaging Services) ,MMS templates, Mobile chat , Picture Phonebook ,Phonealbum ,Sync ML
    Synchronization with PC,Vibrating Call Alert,Voice Dialling ,Wallpaper

    Trium Mondo (mitsubishi)
    WAP 1.1,Currency converter,Games,Handsfree built in,Web browser (Pocket Explorer),E-mail (Pocket Outlook),Touch screen with 16 grey levels,Voice recorder,MP3 reader,PDA compatible,Auto-adjust world clock,Document storage,GPRS (General Packet Radio Service),Fax and data capabilities

    (these links are all 2.5g tech as well, i didnt dare link to japans 3g phones/pda's to save Danger the embarrasment.)

    Now i can buy all these products right now in my high street and have been able to for 6 months , and Danger have a device that should of been marketed 2years ago and is sadly lacking, it might be ok for the USA market but in Japan and Europe where devices are seen not only for their features (video/color screens etc)but for their fashion appeal and asthetics this device is dead in the water before its even released.

    In all i think Danger have some catching up to do or revise their target market before entering this domain

    1. Re:They already missed the boat by Cato · · Score: 2

      The Danger is addressing a different market - a low-cost device with flat rate data, aimed at young people, with an emphasis on email and instant messaging.

      The 7650 costs about 300 UKP on contract, or $450, and has only become available in the UK in the last couple of weeks. Other European markets are similar in timing, so I doubt you have been able to buy it for 6 months. The T68i was launched a couple of months ago, and the Trium Mondo looks so horrible that a local retailer has it on special offer as obsolete stock.

      None of the devices you mention are suitable for the youth market, because they are way too expensive. In time, the mainstream GPRS/MMS phones will get cheaper and address this market, but Danger has taken a clever approach by moving much of the functionality onto servers, reducing the cost of the device and enabling it to hit a low required price point.

      I agree about the fashion appeal, though - the Danger looks quite drab by comparison to many new phones, so it will have to have killer features and pricing to succeed.

  28. It's the server arch that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Danger's real contribution is the Java-based server architecture for managing 3G devices (the first of which is the Hiptop/Sidekick; they keep saying their not in it for the handhelds -- right). This is the necessary complement to a high-speed infrastructure. You still can't do much with a slightly faster WAP phone.

    This guy has more tech.

    And it runs Linux and Ascii Doom! (kidding)

  29. Cognition, Relevance and Mobility by gabbarsingh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems from the demo this device comes closest to a way of accessing information and communication while being on the move. Vendors don't seem to understand that I don't want to do *everything* on a mobile device. And with PocketPC all developers can think of is porting desktop applications to a smaller form factor. Clearly the issues of human cognition and ergonomics is neglected by developers who are only concerned with enablement. Enablement is so often misunderstood for actual benefit or relevance. The Mac in 1984 understood this, including the one button mouse. The hardware wasn't exactly efficient as far as raw computing is concerned but it was efficient for human use. The QWERTY keyboard in Hiptop is example of this. Sure it is familiar. Sure it extends what is already out there. But is it useful. I recall anecdotaly that the QWERTY keyboard was designed to slow down typists. In any case it is meant for typing by a set of ten fingers than two thumbs.

    That keyboard issue aside, the device screen shots look quite efficient in the manner they get the user from one function to other. The FAQ mention that they have their own virtual machine. This is important. A container environment, I think, is the best way to deploy applications (or rather applets) in a small device. A system of applets should surround data and provide "chaining" just like the Unix shells' filter/redirection rather than the desktop idea of apps/data. This might be a good way to approach mobile devices rather than the standalone app and file format crud.

    1. Re:Cognition, Relevance and Mobility by Cato · · Score: 2

      What sort of keyboard would you suggest rather than Qwerty? Nobody is going to learn a Dvorak or Maltron layout just to use a mobile device... The Qwerty layout was originally designed to slow down typing (back when typewriters were wholly mechanical and jammed easily), but that's not really relevant when you are using your thumbs to bash out a short message.

  30. Sorry, that too much work... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2
    Would it kill them to put a larger-than-thumbnail picture of the thing up with the review?

    Yes it would. Welcome to net journalism. So much for the web being a multimedia resource. I think it's mostly just lazyness.

  31. Re:Check your Inner Geek (or Google, at least) by darkPHi3er · · Score: 2
    "When are these manufacturers going to define something really useful.(?)"

    being generous to your observation, you can probably do useful voice recognition with something around a 1GHZ P3/256MB RAM/50-100MB of SROM for the voice rec firmware

    some developer friends who have extensive voice rec XPerience (i don't) would say 1.5GHZ P4/512MB RAM/100-200MB of SROM....

    even given super low power versions of all these parts (which DON'T exist at this time)

    your battery life (assuming 2-4 AA spec cells (more for form factor than any other reason, you'd actually use LiPoly, but you still wouldn't have room for than the eqivalent of 4 AAs) your battery life would be measured in minutes

    "Obviously, Danger Inc. got stuck with the lame-os who were unwilling to persue handwriting recognition. (or voice recognition, or a b.a.t. keypad, or even DVORAK keyboard.)"

    obviously you're NOT an engineer, OR don't understand either "economies of scale" OR just how hard it is to get a new technological standard adopted...(check with BeOS developers).

    if all this tech existed (it doesn't) the device would retail between $1500 - $3000, hardly good territory for a consumer communications device

    THAT MIGHT BE WHY THEY DIDN'T DO SOMETHING "USEFUL"???????

    --
    Ten quid, she's so easy to blind. And not a word is spoken...