Taiwan and South Korea's LCD Market-Share Battle
prostoalex writes: "This lengthy article on Reuters Web site, filled with numbers and analyst references, talks about Korean and Taiwanese manufacturers starting a price war in the field of LCD. Apparently, last year all Taiwan-based manufacturers lost money, while Koreans made money, and the companies are ready to slash their prices in turn for market share." From my reading of the article, it looks like the manufacturers may actually be reluctant to trade profits for market share, but this kind of competition still sounds good for LCD buyers.
But how long will it last?
Life is the sport of champions. Those who lose, die.
I recently got an 18" Cornea flatpanel. It's great, a terrific monitor at the price of the other guy's 17". I suppose some might balk that it only has VGA analog inputs, but that's all I'm ready for anyway.
I think the company is Korean, maybe did some work for OEMs, and now they're out on their own.
Probably all psychosomatic, but it feels great to only be beaming myself with hours and hours of CRT radiation at work, not at home...
SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
Well, think I'll wait, then.
Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
Define "losing" money. And what is "profit?" Is it how you phrase the question to the accountant?
These companies do invest great amounts of capital for machines and upgrades. Much of this is overtime and I'm sure the employees don't feel that this is a "loss."
I'm still waiting for OLED's.
?-|||-----x<*))))><
I just bought my very first LCD yesterday. oh well...
Headline: Taiwan and South Korea's LCD Market-Share Battle....
...in an online Starcraft tournament on Blizzard's Battle.net. The battle consisted of 14 hours of rushes utilizing the cheapest game unit possible while both countries exchanged insults such as "n00b", and "haha FAG!". Film at 11.
When LCD manufacturers compete, YOU WIN!
This just in: Computer hardware getting cheaper.
Okay, that's a bit cynical. Lovely news. I would consider an LCD, if I knew the quality was good and the price was better.
Although I found a great 15" LCD screen from a company called Gericom at 350 Euros, new, with energy company rebate. It looks better than most of the competition, quality and speedwise. No ghosting, clear picture, and all that.
...although LCD costs might be cheaper to the large laptop oems, it's doubtful any of them will immediately pass on the profits. In fact I'm fairly sure they'll wait for the competition to move before they do.
For the OEMS this price drop (potential price drop) would mean more profit with no effect on market share. Who would give that up unless they had to?
Woohoo! =D
My
Limekiller
They really know how to make great products.l cdtvmonito radvanced.htm
I used to be a big Sony fan. Now with the cool MP3 CD Players coming out of Korea, and the cool looking table top LCD TV's retailing at $159.99. Imagine Casio with a tiny 3 inch cost this price alone. Forget Sony, you'll never see an LCD TV made by Sony at this price or quality.
http://www.merconnet.com/lcdscreens/tft
Korea makes great products. Thank you.
do you suffer from Attention Deficit Disorder or something like that?
I was in Taiwan last December, and nearly everyone there has flat screens. It was hard to find CRTs anywhere. Even public schools have flatpanels. I should have bought one there, i could have gotten a decent 17" for around $250.
;)
My gf(who is taiwanese) and i go computer shopping often and we are always aghast at how much more expensive flat panels are here in the states. $500 for a 15" flat panel? No thanks. Fortunately we have the hookup in Taiwan
A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
Enjoy yourself and your new monitor!
If you're going to listen to this advice then I hope you've got a box of screen cleaning wipes handy.
"Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
The Korean company Samsung has a lot to do with this, I think. They absolutely own the high end market. I'm lucky enough to have a Samsung 240T, which is a 24" diagonal unit that can do 1920x1200 and can mix the digital and analog inputs (picture in picture). At $4995 (almost two years ago) it wasn't cheap, but it's rock solid, gorgeous, has an incredible viewing angle, and nothing else came close (at the time, anyway). Samsung used to have a rep as a crapfacturer, but these days they've really come up in the world.
Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
selling products under own costs is not any good for the consumer in the long run. They are not lowering the prices to do common good. Instead they do it to kill the other one and make bigger profits later by raising prices.
>>it looks like the manufacturers may actually >>be reluctant to trade profits for market >>share, but this kind of competition still
>>sounds good for LCD buyers
This kind of competition sounds great for stabilizing the economy. Aren't these the same tactics all the CLECs were using before they all when bankrupt and were bought wholesale by AOL & AT&T?
Man am I hungover. Also, linux is for bitches.
Posted article reads:
However, the article reads:
If the poster is accurate, this means that the Taiwanese profits have grown from some unknown negative to a postive 20 in less than a year. Decent gains on profits if you ask me.
You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
Besides, aren't they counting on a few additional facts?
- LCD prices are continuously dropping due to improved manufacturing processes
- larger volumes means lower prices
I'm guessing the plan is something like this:Bleh!
So globalism DOES have a bright side, eh?
and at the same timre you're driving down the prices for others.
truely an American icon.
Two days ago I bought a Sharp 16" TFT. It cost $650, so you might say.. "shoulda got a 17 incher!" But.. it's the absolute luxury top of the range 16", with features only the best (and mighty expensive) 17" screens have.. like anti-glare, 25ms response time (compared to the regular 50ms).. and 1280x1024 res.
That all said, I hope prices don't fall! I want to be able to sell this baby for at least half what I paid for it in a year's time! Then again, whenever I buy something it seems to crash in value the week after anyway.. so perhaps I should buy an Apple Studio Display next, huh?
mogorific carpentry experiments
From what I know, the majority of LCDs produced today are still made in Taiwan.. and that's a bad thing.
It's teh same problem that chip manufacturers are facing -- what happens when the majority of your compoinets are made in the same small area of land? should something catostophic happen, your supply could be completely wiped out.
Other's getting into the game is good for this so whouls something happen to Taiwan like a major earthquake (it is on the "ring of fire") you still have other suppliers in other places who can help take up the slack.
Remeber the Fire in a Taiwanese industial park a few years ago? One factory catching fire sent memory prices soarsing for a few weeks.. just think if a few factories where utterly destoyed?
Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
They manufs. controlling the prices are simply waiting for an opportunity to re-establish profit margins. They will fight for control, while margins return...this does not mean that once they have control, prices will rise.
Don't spread FUD by calling flawed logic 'insightful'.
Korea & Taiwan manufs. are both losing money right now (I work R & D for one of the big Korean firms)...market share is simply a land grab by any means. The battle is to see who can tolerate low margins the longest. Once the other guy cries uncle, margins will have returned naturally, and profits can then be enjoyed.
No way are profit margins as high as stated. Any number over 5% is bs.
in the long term at least.
.. they will not be getting newer/better LCD technology anytime soon.
Profits from LCD drops. Investment in increasing current capacity drops (investing in shoe manufacturing is more profitable). If thats not bad enough, investment in future OLED manufacturing processes drop drastically.
LCD buyers are left dealing with supply shortages, and worse
IANAEBIRAS (I am not an economist but I read Adam Smith)
laptop with UXGA 1600x1200 pixel resolution, but
can't find a 15 inch LCD monitor with the same
resolution for any price.
Oh yes. There are 20 inch LCDs for over $1500 with
that resolution, but a cheap old 19 monitor
for $300 these days supports 1600x1200.
Point is... I believe LCD industry is holding back
on sweeter resolutions to get everyone to
upgrade after everyone has purchased an LCD. And
EVERYONE hasn't purchased an LCD yet.
As a software engineer/lead dude in Taiwan, i feel that the more fabs outputting the merrier. I keep my job and everyone stays happy -- obviously the customer will benefit the most from such a competitive environment. Kinda like the RAM market was a few years back.
... but just remember AUO Fab 8 and Chimei Fab 3 in Taiwan coming up soon. LG / Samsung has one 5G running as we speak and probably another one coming soon. In fact, I heard AUO Fab 9 will be done by the end of next year...
Right now I'm working on Acer-Unipac Line 8 which is a 5G (fifth generation) outfit that put's out glass beginning in the 21" form-factor. The previous fabs like L6/L5 will pick up speed in the 17" arena. I think Samsung's newest place in Korea is also 5G and was up and running well before Acer.
The next 5G fab coming up is Chimei Fab 3 in Tainan . Both the Acer and Chimei fabs will be rolling full production by next spring. This will bring TV-class LCD panel prices down quite a bit.
The carrier sizes for these babies are huge -- I mean like the size of your regular cubicle. Good ole wafer fabs you used to be able to hand-carry the product around. These you need a forklift. But since they don't have any "clean" forklifts they have to use these funky $60,000 USD handcarts that move them around.
Anyway, I'm blabbing
So, I probably said too much, but I didn't sign any NDA, so I don't care...
A few guys at work (IT company specialising in online apps) have LCD's, but I'll take a 21" CRT monitor anyday. The image is sharper, the refresh rates are higher (85hrz) and there's much more room for my screen hungry IDE. LCD's just haven't reached a price point in the UK where it's worth buying them. Once they reach 350GBP for a 19" monitor then I'll be ready to swap over. Hell, I might even get three and run a multi-screen desktop, like the traders do. Personally though, I reckon Doom III will still look better on a big-ass CRT due to colour saturation and improved refresh rates.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
and if the Taiwanese are LOSING MONEY, then the Taiwanese are doing SOMETHING TERRIBLY WRONG !
I mean, we are not talking about making floppy disks here. These LCD babies are STILL expensive !
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !