Slashdot Mirror


Doctor Phlox on Season 2 of Enterprise

Steve Krutzler writes "TrekWeb has posted a brand new interview with actor John Billingsley (Doctor Phlox on Enterprise). He talks all about the second season of the Star Trek prequel including the upcoming episodes "A Night In Sickbay," "Minefield" (featuring the first encounter with the Romulans!) and "Dead Stop." He also talks about the character of Doctor Phlox possibly falling into the 'Neelix Trap' and says he wishes the series would kill more people off like the original Star Trek!" Billingsly was great on a recent episode of SG1 too. I'm seriously excited for the next season of Enterprise. I don't think I've ever said that about any of the other Trek series.

33 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Typical Enterprise Episode by happyhippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Goto new planet or space phenomenon.
    2. Imply Vulcans are either stupid and/or evil.
    3. Marvel at planet or phenomenon.
    4. Go down to planet/phenomenon.
    5. Get into trouble.
    6. Shoot at bad aiming aliens and escape planet.
    7. Wrap up episode implying how Vulcans are agian evil/stupid.

    1. Re:Typical Enterprise Episode by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the first viewing of the pilot episode where the explicit and gratuitous 'Rubbing gel all over the bodies of a well-stacked bird and some buffed up fella' scene happened I have had little interest in Star Trek Enterprise.

      The theme song is cringeworthy. They're blatantly using T'Pol to keep the sex-starved geekboys interested (To boldy pout where no large-breasted tramp has pouted before). There's (as is usual these days) an extreme overabundance of Americans (I mean, yeah, it's a big country, but you get the feeling any other country on Earth is slipped in only for plot development these days).

      And the Vulcans! Logical, suppresed emotions? My arse, the actors like to think that Arrogant, Condescending, Irritable and Sarcastic are things that a highly intelligent being with supressed emotions and a fixation on Logic would be doing, it's all been downhill since Spock if you ask me! What's more, as well as being some much-need T&A to keep the boys awake T'Pol is also continuing the theme of inhuman outsider who really really wants to be Human (or if you prefer and are a little cynical like me, really really want to be American). cf Data, Odo, 7of9 (note the theme of Tits In Tight Clothing coupled with Struggling to understand Humanity/The American Way they learned there and are making good use of now).

      It's all stuff we've seen before. They're all plots we've seen in one way or another before. The Aliens are still Just Humans(with all their mannerisms and emotions) With Funny Faces, they still use the Teleporters to get them out of sticky situations and I just know the Holodeck will make an appearance at some point so they can get down to some serious Holo-cobblers a la TNG and Voyager. All in all this in no way, for me, feels like a prequel to TOS, it feels just like one of a million other Americanised SciFi shows and after the horror story of Voyager (I won't even start to list how that narked me off) I hold little hope for Star Trek, it's all one big Franchise now and will never be allowed to die like it should have after DS9 (or before, according to taste).

      Maybe I'm just jaded ;0).

      Frink
      --
      "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
  2. Phlox and Romulans by nedron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, I'll admit that I don't think Enterprise is very good. I also don't think TNG, DS(, or Voyager were very good either.

    That being said, I really like John Billingsley and fell he is the only redeeming feature of Enterprise.

    As for the Romulans, I can only assume it will be the Romulans of TNG/DS9/Voyager and not the Romulans of Star Trek. I'm still unsure why it was necessary to swap the virutes of the Romulans and Klingons, but that's just one of the major changes Berman/Pillar have made to the Trek universe.

    Ah well.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
    1. Re:Phlox and Romulans by nedron · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I just finished reading Errand of Vengeance: The Edge of the Sword by Kevin Ryan. He made the unfortunate choice to use many ST:TNG period Klingon attributes that read like speed bumps in a Star Trek novel. You're cruising along and then, bang , "Sho vo kor", speed bump. OK, I'm getting into the book again and, bang , "Kahless", speed bump. Rolling again, gaining speed, bang , "Klingon honor", speed bump. None of these would be out of place at all in a TNG novel and wouldn't cause me problems, but having them in s Star Trek (or Star Trek, The Original Series as Paramount insists on calling it) is a real distraction since they don't belong.

      The same thing happened with the lamentable "Star Trek: The Eugenics Wars". Everything was fine with the first book until the pointless addition of many TNG/DS9 characters. Even worse, the author decided that we couldn't possibly differentiate between reality and science fiction and tried to hide the events of the Eugenics Wars in our modern milieu. Ugh.

      --


      * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  3. Ensigns by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    what happened to the expendible extras in star trek? kirk: the away team will consist mof myself, spock, bones and ensign billy, now this mission could be dangerous, one of us may not make it back..."

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  4. Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I can never get enough of these comments:

    - The writers can't keep track of 10 movies and 24 seasons of episodes! Why can't they dedicate their lives to memorizing the Star Trek timeline like I have?

    - STTNG was the only good series, the rest were crap. I can't believe they'd keep this show going even though the ratings were so good!

    - Enterprise sucks! It offends me so deeply I want to tear my eyes out! I just can't get over there being a scifi show I don't like.

    - I don't like this show, so nobody should.

    I like to read these comments, then sit back and imagine what Galaxy Quest 2 will be like.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "- The writers can't keep track of 10 movies and 24 seasons of episodes! Why can't they dedicate their lives to memorizing the Star Trek timeline like I have?"

      Heh I found that one amusing. I know people like that. Here's what bugs me: Enterprise has a wonderful opportunity to explore some of the events that were alluded to in the other series. Not only that, but we get it from the perspective of people fresh into deep space. This is really exciting, but these stupid 'purists' think that the show is better if they adhere to it literally. Do that, and you lose your opportunity. Some flexibility should be allowed.

      It's a TV show! It's ENTERTAINMENT! Enjoy it, don't sit there and act like you could make it better because you remember details that were only intended to pad out the drama.

      If you want rationalization for the 'inconsistencies', consider this: The 1701-E Enterprise influenced with Cochrane's life. The biggest hint of that was the naming of the NX-01 to Enterprise. Imagine it that way, quit griping, and enjoy the show!

      Nobody wants to witness a Milhouse Vs. Screech debate.

    2. Re:Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "...but if I had a job related to the continuation of it you better believe I'd do my homework."

      I got news for ya: You'd definitely make mistakes. Let's do a little math:

      4 series. TOS had 3 seasons (I think), TNG had 7, DS9 had 7, Voy had 7. There were 10 movies, 6 of which based on the TOS crew, the other 4 were based on the TNG crew (with one approaching rapidly.) I think the number of episodes per season was in the 22-27 range depending on the series, so let's pretend there's 23 eps per season just for giggles. 7 * 3 + 3 = 24. 24 * 23 = approximately 552 episodes to watch.

      Sorry, you're human mind isn't capable of doing that error free. This isn't a 'homework' scenario, it's a PHD.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by decefett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, you're human mind isn't capable of doing that error free. This isn't a 'homework' scenario, it's a PHD.

      Respectfully disagree, 552 episodes is not that many, especially when you cut out all the ones that deal solely interpersonal issues between characters. There are books about major events in the timeline and it is the screwing with major events that pisses ordinary fans off. Glossing over some obscure event from an earlier series is fine if it will greatly enhance the current one.

      The Ferengi episode is a great example, it added nothing the story of Enterprise but took too much licence with the timeline (they recorded the Ferengi on security cameras for gods sake). The episode on it's own was quite good but but even my girlfreind (only a casual fan) found the blantant timeline flouting annoying.

      I have been enjoying Enterprise, far more than I thought I would but if they need to resort to screwing with the established universe in first season I have my doubts about it's staying power.

      --
      Australian? Join EFA
    4. Re:Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by NeuroManson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or as the crusty fat lumpy one said in an ancient Saturday Night Live sketch:

      "Get a life!"

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    5. Re:Boy I love when Star Trek is a topic... by Snaller · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Here's what bugs me: Enterprise has a wonderful
      >opportunity to explore some of the events that
      >were alluded to in the other series. Not only
      >that, but we get it from the perspective of
      >people fresh into deep space. This is really
      >exciting, but these stupid 'purists' think that
      >the show is better if they adhere to it
      >literally.

      Those stupid purists being Berman and company?

      >It's a TV show!

      That doesn't mean it has to be stupid.

      > It's ENTERTAINMENT!

      That doesn't mean it has to be stupid.

      >Enjoy it,

      Enjoyment is what you enjoy, and some people can't enjoy what they find stupid.

      >... don't sit there and act like you could make it better ...

      You don't know that they couldn't. Infact these days it seems it wouldn't be that hard.

      >...because you remember details that were only
      >intended to pad out the drama.

      You don't know what those details were for. And Michael Okuda sneaked in a lot of those details on TNG, that didn't hurt or harm anyone and arguably improved on the flavour.

      Just because you are content to settle for less, don't vilify those who want more.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  5. Inconsistency by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I really do love Enterprise, but it just makes things difficult when Star Trek has to write over itself to try and pretend that it's really our future yet to come.

    The Enterprise on the show was never featured in Star Trek 1 as "One of the ships that had the name Enterprise"

    There's an episode with the Ferengi in Enterprise. They hardly knew anything about the Ferengi on the first season of "The Next Generation". One of the ferengi (I believe played by Armin Shimmerman at the time) comments on how ugly the humans really are. Yet one of the Ferengi seem to obsess over a Vulcan.

    This show has equipment far more elaborate than the original series. The consoles on the original show were dials and knobs.

    Whatever happened to the Eugenics War of the 1990's? The one where Khan ruled 1/4 of the Earth, and ends up being ejected into space.

    And my personal favorite, The Royale from Star Trek:TNG, where Picard goes off for 2 minutes on how Fermat's Last Theorem goes unsolved. Yes, Star Trek could be in a universe where Fermat's Last Theorem is unsolved, but then in Star Trek DS9, Dax was commenting on how she created another proof for it.

    When I think of Star Trek, I always think of it as being in an alternate future, kind of like Command And Conquer: Red Alert where World War 2 never happened. Just I wish they'd keep things straight, and everything in the same universe. :)

    Then again, maybe Star Trek TNG, Star Trek Original and Star Trek: Enterprise belong in different Quantum Realities :)

    For their sake, I hope black holes do exist. It would suck if they had to go over all of the TNG/DS9 episodes and dub the word "Black Hole" with "Gravastar".

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Inconsistency by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Whatever happened to the Eugenics War [startrek.com] of the 1990's? The one where Khan ruled 1/4 of the Earth, and ends up being ejected into space.
      >
      > And my personal favorite, The Royale [startrek.com] from Star Trek:TNG, where Picard goes off for 2 minutes on how Fermat's Last Theorem goes unsolved.

      Hmph. Obviously, the proof of Fermat's Last Theorem derived by human/machine symbiotes in the late 20th century was... umm, one of humanity's treasures that was lost during the carnage of the Eugenics Wars of the 1990s!

      The fact that the historical record lists the Eugenics Wars as being in the "1990s" was just an error in the historical record, arising from the Great UNIX Date Catastrophe of 2038. (Notice how the Star Trek universe never mentions the Great UNIX Date Catastrophe of 2038? It's because it happened, and all the dates got screwed up, and as a result there's no historical reference to it!)

      Beam me up, Paramount, there are no scriptwriters here. ("Dammit, Jim, I'm a Slashdotter, not a scriptwriter!")

    2. Re:Inconsistency by Latent+IT · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but maybe you don't want them opening all the time... who knows what might happen? Maybe the TNG Enterprise had advanced AI to determine if the crewmember was actually trying to walk into the room blocked by the door, or just walking down the hall. On a starship, you don't want doors that open willy-nilly, like every time I walk past CVS on my way to the bank.

      God, what the hell am I saying?!? You know, I don't think geeks watch Star Trek. I think Star Trek makes geeks.

    3. Re:Inconsistency by kmellis · · Score: 5, Funny

      "God, what the hell am I saying?!? You know, I don't think geeks watch Star Trek. I think Star Trek makes geeks."


      Thank you so much for providing the payoff for reading this thread. I wish I had some mod points to mod you up.

    4. Re:Inconsistency by jandrese · · Score: 4, Informative

      Think of it this way. There is a temporal cold war going on. There is quite a bit of subterfuge on both sides and no doubt plenty of assassination attempts on key figures thoughout history. Minor timeline inconsistancies are merely the work of time terrorists.

      Plus, there is a good chance that the Computer on the Enterprise will be damaged in a future episode before they get a chance to get back to Earth. Star Fleet computers seem to be very susceptable to this sort of tampering, as every third alien speices they encounter seems to be able to figure out the root password (which is apparently "password"). If the records were lost then it would account for the scarce anecdotal evidence the NCC-1701D crew had on the Ferengi when they first met them. Lord knows that nobody in Star Fleet has ever kept a backup.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  6. Why I gave up on Enterprise ... by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Although I was skeptical, Enterprise didn't start out as badly as I would have expected.

    It was different enough of a show that I continued to watch, at least up until the episode entitled "Dear Doctor", in which the ship's doctor got morally fixated on the wrong problem and convinced the Captain to ignore the tens of thousands that were dying every day, along with the strong possibility that the entire race would soon follow.

    My reaction was along the lines of: "Wait, so this race can't fly through space faster than warp one, and therefore you're going to knowingly kill them off? Fsck you, Federation!"

    Since that episode I gave up on the series for falling into the sad attempts at ignoring a good plot in an attempt to "present a moral lesson".

    1. Re:Why I gave up on Enterprise ... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      (* You also have to keep in mind there really isn't a prime directive yet. They haven't messed up enough planets to have a set of rules to tell them not to. *)

      Thats what Enterprise should be about: making all the stupid mistakes that the later ships have rules against.

      I am still waiting for, "Oh yeah, Baby, take that bra off and I'll give your people warp drive!"

  7. Re:Billingsley is the token annoying character by ChadN · · Score: 3, Funny

    and on TOS, it was Kirk.

    --
    "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
  8. The technical solutions of Star Trek by OzRoy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I must admit I haven't watched Enterprise. But the thing that always struck me about almost all star trek episodes (except the original series) is the way they always get out of trouble. Solution number 1: "Pass the tachyon beam through the deflector array" Solution number 2: "Reverse the polarity of the nuetron flow" And it is guaranteed to work.

  9. BoreTrek, The previous generation by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, but the only thing that got me to watch Enterprise was uber babe Jolene Blalock.

    StarTrek has degrading from swashbuckling action to moral pontification in space, no more "Let's get our shirts ripped, blow away the bad guys and get the greenskinned girl back to our quarters."

    Now it's, "who are we to act like gods in space? ...To fire the proton torpedoes or not, that is the question Captain"

    To be fair, the series premiere and finale were good, I really enjoyed. But, all the episodes in between were old hat and just plain boring.

    What I'd like to see? Mission Impossible StarTrek style, ditch the ship and whip out all the cool gadgets to spy on bad guys and make big explosions with! Seriously though, a StarTrek focused on a few StarFleet secret agents with the latest in badass sci-fi tech going out on commando missions would definitely be worth watching and add some new blood into the aging ratings vehicle.

    UPN dudes -- You reading this?

  10. Oh, this is good! by Pollux · · Score: 3, Funny

    He also talks about the character of Doctor Phlox possibly falling into the 'Neelix Trap' and says he wishes the series would kill more people off like the original Star Trek!

    I can see it now...Star Trek: Enterprise, Season Two:

    Star Trek meets South Park!

    Captain Archer: "Oh my God! They killed Dr. Phlox!" "You Bastards!"

    Ensign Mayweather: "But he's the most popular person on the Enterprise! How will we ever replace him?"

    Commander Tucker: "No need to worry captain! We have a copy of his atomic signature in the cache of the data resequencer in the transporter! We'll be able to generate an exact copy of him, as if he never left!"

    --- BZZZ BZZZ ZIP! ---

    Dr. Phlox: "Hello, captain! I'm back from helping out the Balaxians on Balax 7! I hope nothing happened while I was gone!"

  11. My take on Enterprise... by Raleel · · Score: 3, Redundant

    When I heard who was gonna be in it, I said two things

    1) Scott Bakula will make a crappy captain. He's way too soft
    2) I like the keep my porn and my star trek separate, thank you.

    Sure enough, I was right. Scott Bakula is not a very good captain, in my opinion. He's getting better, but really, he's pretty soft. Too happy.

    As for T'pol, yes, she's hot, but she's been doing an ok job of not making a big sex symbol out of herself. Save for the obligatory near sex scene in the decontamination chamber.

    What's really getting me the most the the _grotesque_ opening theme. Good lord. That may be the worst crap I've ever heard.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  12. Wish they were interviewing T'Pol by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bringing STAR TREK's newest alien face to life isn't always easy for actress Jolene Blalock, who's spent the last month jiggling her time in space with her time in...

    Now that's an interview I might actually read!

    GMD

  13. More Bikinis! by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who cares about all that crap. I just want to see the large-breasted vulcan chick in a bikini. How hard would that be to work into the storyline?

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  14. $0.205 by AnalogBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Star Trek in the Roddenberry era was all about humanity. The ship was just a vehicle. Nowadays, its gotten pretty formulaic. Most of the Q Episodes after the first two were always good for a bit of lite philisophical entertainment, but damn near everything else was.. egh.

    Roddenberry is doing a friction-free 200000RPM around in his..err, space-urn.

    (Unless it's de-orbited already.)

  15. Can't happen by smoketree · · Score: 5, Funny

    It should be obvious that transporters -- like all devices in the future -- will have DRM protections preventing duplication.

    --Reed

  16. Series needs 50cc of creativity, STAT. by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...and says he wishes the series would kill more people off like the original Star Trek"

    HEAR, HEAR!! I've become a hardened cynic when it comes to Trek lately. It's been way too sanitised and this new series is no exception. If there was one series that could have benifited from a darker, more brooding plot, this is the one. I had originally envisioned Enterprise taking it's cues from America's blue water Navy during the American Revolution-- The Federation just stepping out onto the Frontier; Outgunned and woefully behind the technology curve, struggling to maintain soveignty amoung the stars. But what do we get? The bumbling crew of the first Enterpise that miraculously stumbles from one encounter to the next against vastly superior opponents and still manages to emerge in one piece. And to top that, they're already leaning on Trek's infamous temporal crutch, that way overused script idea. John is right-- This series needs to loose a few people as well as some major plot CPR. Sure, the Rombulans are coming (is it just me or is the Okuda time line just a bit out of sorts here?), but the way things are going now, it's going to be yet another ho-hum experience...

    Finally, it's not entirely a haters club here. While I doubt the the person responsible will ever see this, major props to whomever designed the opening credits. I've heard complaints all day long here, but the opening is wonderfully poetic. Stylish. The sole spark of creativity in an otherwise bland series.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  17. Star Trek: TOS by DCMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it bad that I keep reading that as "Star Trek: Terms of Service"?

    --
    DCMonkey
  18. $0.205 by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep.

    "Gee, Bob... What do we have in the script bin?"
    "Um... Don't know. Why don't you go look."
    "I chose the script last time."
    "No, I chose the script last time because the veiwers were complaining about your stupid temporal stories."
    "Hey, it was a good story!"
    "Hey, it was the twelth one this season"
    "Fine. But I beat you in foozball before lunch. You owe me."
    "Fine. Then we can start counting all the sodas you owe ME."
    "Hmmm... Well, I'm still not getting the script."
    "Neither am I."
    "A Q episode?"
    "Sure, why not?"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  19. Expendable Interns by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...Or have some poor intern chained to a filing cabinet whose sole job is to keep track of the Trek timeline. I've heard of worse jobs for em...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  20. Re:Killing People by Kredal · · Score: 3, Informative

    check out the pinstriping on the Enterprise uniforms.. they have the colors that represent different sections.

    Red is engineering and security
    Gold is command
    Blue is science and medical

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  21. Re:Ensigns (and Space Mortality) by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Funny
    You know, when we first went into space, we knew it was dangerous. Plenty of people died, and we were sad about it, but we didn't freak out. By 1987 we had apparently changed, to the point where we really did freak out when the Challenger blew up, and it took us years to get the space program back on track.

    Analogously, when red-shirted ensigns bit it on some dangerous, unexplored planet, Kirk was mad, but that didn't stop him from going erect when some cute alien chick walked by a few minutes later. Hey, going where no man has gone before is supposed to be dangerous. You have some funerals and you get over it!

    This attitude was much less visible by the time Piccard took over command. Ensign mortality went waay down, and the few that bit it were mourned much more deeply. It's just like the Challenger thing: by TNG, people got into the mindset that interstellar space is not so dangerous after all, so they found the occasional ensign mortality appalling. They were also much better prepared to manage the risks of space. (Would Kirk have sent in a councelor to console the survivors? No way! At best, he would have sent in Scotty with some scotch!)

    Of course, by extrapolation, life on the earliest starships would have been far cheaper still. One would expect "ensign resupply busses" to be dispatched regularly to catch up with the Enterprise and replenish its staff. I mean, from technical problems alone, I would imagine a few people might die each month. The first Enterprise was not designed to take hits from most of the weapons fired on it, so naturally it would not have been as mature in terms of safety as the later models... which means, more people would have died in comparatively minor situations. The survivors would surely have the attitude: Hey, that's just what space is like.

    So I'm asking you: Why are ensign deaths so damn rare on the first Enterprise? Is this a big coverup? Are we really seeing "Enterprise propaganda?" Surely, a reasonable person cannot believe that all these interstellar freshmen really live through all those encounters with hostile and technologically superior races, riding on a ship that was designed by engineers who were merely guessing at what starships should be like, having no experience to base their designs on. I mean, come on, anybody gets on that thing is basically does so with the understanding that they will die there, probably sooner rather than later.

    So goddamn it, die already! Then build a new ship, and get a better crew (except keep Phlox, he's cool).