Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X 10.2 "Jaguar" Reviews Pour In

hype7 writes "The reviews on Apple's new Mac OS X 10.2 "Jaguar" are starting to come through. The New York Times (free reg required) heaps on the praise: 'Mac OS X 10.2 is the best-looking, least-intrusive and most thoughtfully designed operating system walking the earth today.' MacCentral is positive: 'From what I've seen Jaguar is leaps and bounds ahead of Mac OS X 10.1 in both speed and functionality.' MacWorld has also chimed in: 'for most users, there are a lot of important improvements in this upgrade: performance boosts, improved printing, and interface enhancements will be immediate benefits. And over time, Mac OS X 10.2's new technologies (including Quartz Extreme and Rendezvous) will make the update even more valuable.'"

34 of 834 comments (clear)

  1. Macworld owns Maccentral by Arcturax · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just FYI, Macworld ownd Maccentral and thus anything coming out of Maccentral will be a parrot of what's coming out of Macworld.

    Not to say that's wrong, just saying that you might have well only mentioned one of the other and picked a different 3rd example.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  2. Re:Unfortunately, they got one thing wrong. by sirinek · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article about the "Family" license allowing you to install one copy on up to five machines can be found here...

    siri

  3. Re:Unfortunately, they got one thing wrong. by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative
    That's the "Family Licensing Plan", for $199, you can install one copy on as many as five Macs:
    Family Pack Software License Agreement allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on up to a maximum of five (5) Apple-labeled computers at a time as long as those computers are located in the same household and used by persons who occupy that same household. By "household" we mean a person or persons sharing the same housing unit such as a home, apartment, mobile home or condominium. This license does not extend to students who reside at a separate on-campus location or to business or commercial users.
    --
    I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  4. Looking good by franzzup · · Score: 2, Informative
    OS X 10.2 has been shipping with new Macs for over a week.


    It feels a lot snappier. I've installed it on a blue&white G3/300, and even without the boost from Quartz Extreme (which requires AGP and Radeon/GeForce or better) the GUI has picked up speed. The Finder is MUCH faster at handling windows with a lot of files and no longer feels like it's asleep at the wheel.


    Maybe OS X will be usable below the Dual GHz G4 level after all. The next thing to try will be iPhoto, which was ridiculously slow on my 500 MHz iBook.

  5. Multi-language support by masterkool · · Score: 2, Informative
    The artical writes:
    International Affair Mac OS X v10.2 comes with full Unicode support and thousands of dollars worth of high-quality fonts -- including Japanese and Chinese -- and supports non-Roman alphabets (like Arabic, Thai and Hebrew) via improved input and a new Unicode Character Palette.>
    Which is a really simple but nice addition. I dont know how many times I've been browsing the ent and run across a Japaneese site. Having dial up, I dont usually feel like downloading 5 mb Unicode translator packs.
    --
    I once shot a man who posted too many, "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these"
  6. Re:Unfortunately, they got one thing wrong. by The+Bod · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are not paying $129 for an upgrade. Apple doesn't sell OS upgrades. When you spend $129 for Jaguar you are getting a FULL version of the OS. You don't have to have an earlier version of the OS installed to install Jaguar.

  7. Busted link by The+Droek · · Score: 5, Informative
    Correct link

    Gotta watch those quotation marks!

  8. Re:Unfortunately, they got one thing wrong. by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've heard somewhere that Apple is relaxing the licensing restriction in certain cases, where you may install one copy on up to 5 Macs. I can't remember where I saw it at, or the restrictions...but I guess that makes it somewhat more bearable...even if we all did that anyway :)

    You're thinking of Apple's Mac OS X Family Pack, which lets you install it on up to 5 Macs in one household for $199. I think it's great for people who want to be legal and have more than one Mac at home.

    I can't figure out how to post a direct URL (the Apple Store doesn't like deep linking) but here's how to get there:
    1. Go to the Apple Store.

    2. Click "Apple Software" in the left column, the first link in the "Software and Books" heading.

    3. The second choice is for the OS X family pack.

  9. Re:how does mac interoperate with windows by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yup. Samba.

    Also NFS.

    Also WebDAV.

    Also has a PPTP-based VPN client.

    Also has "Active Directory" compatibility, whatever that is (some Windows stuff).

    And some other stuff you may have heard of, like RPC, FTP, HTTP, OpenSSH, usw.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  10. Well... by Auckerman · · Score: 5, Informative
    First David Pogue (NY Times) is biased towards the Mac for the most part. Consider that when you read him.


    Now, having gotten that out of the way. OS 10.2 is nice. Speed improvement is striking. Not in the way that, "it should have been that fast in the first place", it's more in the way of the first time I installed BeOS on a computer to see it in comparision to WinME.


    Networking is definitely faster. I haven't benched anything yet, but I can say if you have a fast line, you will see your web browser of choice speed up considerably.


    The "disconnect from Network bug" is still there. Connect to a SMB, AppleTalk, or DAV volume and pull your network cord (or turn off the machine exporting the drive) and you will get the spinning wheel of death.


    Video Performance is spooky, even on an origional G4 tower. You really have to see it to understand.


    iChat is next to useless, but the auto discovery of other clients is nice.


    SMB export was a pain in the ass. You have to enable it on a user by user basis, which wasn't obvious, in the Accounts preference pane. Then after it's enabled for a user, you have change their password. Since the GUI client changes both the Samba password and Unix password for the user, at the same time, the users CANNOT just change their password on the command line. This also raises fears that the Samba passwords are stored in cleartext on the harddrive. I suspect, this is not the case, but haven't look yet. There is no convient way to set the SMB workgroup in the GUI


    XDarwin needed to be repaired (which is available at the X on X site and seemingly not part of what Fink compiles) to work. This was annoying.


    The firewall has Gnutella as an option to allow.


    My SCSI CD Burner stopped working. I suspect the old SCSI bug is back for the time being.


    Some other shit I foget....

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:Well... by rob+colonna · · Score: 2, Informative

      i've got it running on my old iBook so far (an original 366), and it's pretty sweet so far.

      i can confirm that the speed improvement is very striking indeed. this system is old, and has a crap video chip in it, and nevertheless, the UI is now pretty much as responsive as OS 9 was.

      The CPU monitor is much happier, in general; there seems to be a lower baseline level of activity, although that is purely subjective at this point.

      Battery life seems to be improved when the HD isn't thrashing (as in, i spent 2 hrs IM-ing the other night and only used 30% of the battery, but the rate when i play MP3s still seems unchanged).

      The minimize/restore 'genie' and 'scale' effects are much, much, much smoother.

      QuickTime playback is better (this was also helped by the earlier 10.1.5 addition of Rage Pro support).

      iChat is nice enough. The speech bubbles are sort of cheesy, but if you have an icon that has a face, they're pretty funny in a silly sort of way. It's a little buggy, though.

      The Search field in the Finder is indispensable.

      The ability to set *smaller fonts* in the Finder is cause for celebration for those of us with old iBooks with 800x600 screens.

      Mail is a lot more responsive, and no longer chokes on HTML emails.

      The AirPort menu icon scrolls a little ticker with the name of the network you've connected to when you connect. Very spiffy, but only useful to those who use many networks.

      The battery level occasionally gets confused; thinks it's empty when it definitely isn't.

      Recent Items comes up less sluggishly.

      All in all, it's a very good upgrade, particularly just due to the increased level to which it plays well with my admittedly ill-suited iBook. And two of the new toys, iSync and iCal are still coming, so don't forget to consider those as part of the value as well.

  11. Re:how does mac interoperate with windows by arson1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a link to the info you are looking for: http://www.apple.com/macosx/jaguar/compatibility.h tml

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
  12. non-reg NYT link by ydnar · · Score: 2, Informative
  13. Re:Does it support appleshare via appletalk? by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Apple is trying to kill off native AppleTalk and just using AFP via TCP/IP.

    AFAIK, Jaguar supports mounting Windows shares out of the box. For Mac OS 9.x, you can get DAVE from Thursby.

    There is also a means to get OS X machines to speak old-school AppleTalk. Dunno if it'll work in your situation, but you enable it by using the NetInfo Manager application. Go to /config/AppleFileServer, and modify the attribute "use_appletalk" from 0 to 1. A full description of the procedure can be found at the bottom of this page, but what I wrote above is enough to get an OS X Mac speaking old AppleTalk.

    ~Philly

  14. OS 10.2 on older hardware by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I ordered the Family licence, but got my hands on the 10.2 upgrade CDs in my 17" iMac.

    So I installed on the older hardware around the house.

    Beige G3 with Radeon/466MHz G3/Firewire
    iMac DV 400 MHz
    Powerbook G3 400MHz

    The Beige G3 is really snappy. Bootup is down to about 25 seconds from when the chime starts to when the Dock shows up. Everything about it is fast, fast and stable.

    iMac and Powerbook are also very snappy. Finder draws when a large folder on a remote drive open are as fast as they are in 9.2.2.

    My Beige G3 would hang about one every two days when I monkeyed with Firewire, no longer.

    10.2 on my PowerBook G4 550 is really fast. Only problem is that I can't get Dave to uninstall.

    Worth the $200 for 5 or $129 for a single.

  15. Re:command line apps slower by foobar104 · · Score: 4, Informative

    command line apps seem very much slower

    Believe it or not, it's a graphics thing. Try turning off antialiasing in Terminal.app. The option is found under the application menu, in Window Settings, on the Display pane.

    You must not be using Quartz Extreme. With QE, there's no difference between AA and non-AA in Terminal.app.

  16. Educational Price is at $69 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just go to apple.com, look for authorized bookstores that are online, and pick a college campus.

  17. Re:They just keep pumping them out... by murr · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you look at the release history of MacOS, the current pace is not all that unusual. The emerging pattern is about one "major" and one "intermediate" update a year, with a number of "minor" updates sprinkled in, i.e.:
    Year Major / Intermediate / Minor
    1997 8.0 / 7.6 / 7.6.1
    1998 8.5 / 8.1 / 8.5.1
    1999 9.0 / 8.6 / 9.0.1
    2000 / / 9.0.2-9.0.4
    2001 10.0 / 10.1,9.1,9.2 / 10.0.x,10.1.x,9.2.1
    2002 10.2
    The year 2000 did not quite fit that pattern, because of the 9/10 generation change (A similar gap to the 6/7 generation change in 1988-1991). 2001 was unusual because it had the last few 9 updates. The number of minor updates is increasing somewhat, because they can now be delivered semi-automatically through internet software updates.
  18. Re:I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ha, yeah, I've used that one a lot too...

  19. Direct URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  20. Okay, I will bite. by elocutio · · Score: 5, Informative

    But I'm thinking you've already made up your mind.

    ...now that they got rid of their OS which was awful (for what I needed), and are now OpenBSD, I'm more likely to switch.

    Ummm, it's FreeBSD. There's a difference.

    I have seen it, and it is really just window dressing as far as I'm concerned. I have heard that the command line stuff is slower now...

    Hmmm. Well, it's just window dressing wrapped around a Mach kernel. It has native (I said NATIVE) open technologies, like Java, OpenGL, and the Cocoa API. And for what it's worth, I will stack Apple's API's, written in Objective-C, against Win32 or MFC any day of the week. But then, you've already made up your mind. I'm sure you think that Objective-C is a complete waste of time, but I see the best of C++, Smalltalk, Lisp, and Java in Objective-C. It's beautiful to use. If you have to look up the word "erudite" in the dictionary, you probably don't know what I mean. As far as the command utils being slower, I have been running a developer seed of Jaguar for over a month, and it compares very nicely to earlier versions of OS X. I haven't noticed a slowdown.

    Things I care about are price to performance ratio. Ease of programming (tools available - need mySQL, php, Perl, Java, C/C++, etc). Cost of maintenance (software and hardware upgrades), etc etc.

    Apple's stuff is hard to steal. So, you're gonna have to pay $129 for an OS. You will need a machine to run it on. You can get an iMac for $800. So, for around $1000, you get a list of features longer than your arm. You get a development tools CD that comes with everything you need for serious development. Java 1.3.1 is pre-installed. The gcc compiler is pre-installed. OS X loves perl. Apache 1.3.1 is pre-installed. Tomcat is a simple download. I develop cross-platform applications for x86, Moto, and SPARC. And I'll even agree with you that programming for the "classic" MacOS was pretty painful. I love OS X, because it is the most efficient development platform that I own, and I'm pretty sure I've tried them all. (I must admit, I do love many things about Visual Studio).

    As far as upgrades go, on a G3/G4 tower, just pop the hatch and install your RAID. I did a toolless install of a 512GB RAID two weeks ago. It took ten minutes, literally. The most recent machines use DDR ram, Ultra-ATA drives, AGP4x, PCI. What upgrades do you want?? It comes with gigabit ethernet. It comes with a very nice video card, and many of the towers come "dual-head-ready."

    Oh, one more thing. The reason that sliced bread is great is because it's convenient. Someone did the annoying cutting for me. The result is a product that contains less waste and saves me time. Speaking of time, I'm so convinced that you don't care, that I'm not going to waste any more.

  21. A Developer's Opinion by Paradox · · Score: 2, Informative

    In terms of development, OS X is a very attractive deal. You don't have to work in C++ unless you want to (which is a good thing, C++ is a shitty language). The OPENSTEP library is one of the most famous in developer history, and it's only gotten better. Developing in Objective-C and the openstep environment is interesting. There is excellent object-archival and object-graph archival (like a more advanced form of java's serialization) that the librarys use to actually story GUI's. They have an elegant visual system for creating GUI's and object networks visually which is quite usefull for getting the View and Controller part of the MVC paradigm done.

    Apple has excellent Java support, all the bells and whistles, and a Cocoa-Java bridge. Meaning Objective-C, Java, and Applescript code and interact and use the same object library. Very cool. However, they have not gone to 1.4 just yet. Apple says they'll switch in November/December with the iCal and iSync update (something I am looking forward to).

    In terms of maintinence, it's kind of ridiculous. Macs never really need any work. I live in a dusty environment so I blow mine out every now and then. In software, the core system components are kept up-to-date with a nice automated software update package. You can easily use apt-get to get and update new BSD softwate (a project called "fink" at sourceforge).

    Apple release security fixes for its core system components (which include OpenSSL and apache) very quickly. The LONGEST that it's ever taken is about three and a half days.

    Hardware upgrades are just like a PC. Software upgrades are not really established. Some have been free (10.1). This most recent one cost money ($129 standard/family, $60 student).

    In general, Apple has bent over backwards trying to make developers like macs.

    --
    Slashdot. It's Not For Common Sense
  22. Re:Developers, Developers, Developers... by illerd · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's right, the free dev tools and the Cocoa framework are hot shit. The advantage of NSTask over system() and popen() is that its an object and it fits in seamlessly with the rest of the framework. With almost no code you can have it post notifications when there's data available and call other methods. Its just one example of what the framework is all about. It lets you build no-brainer Java like applications that run like normal applications and can actually do usefull stuff. It's got all of the advantages of Java (minus cross-platform, of course) and it compiles into native machine code. And you can work with whatever existing c/c++ libraries you've got. AND THE WHOLE THING COMES WITH THE OS. Not on a separate cd you have to send away for or anything, but right on the retail cd. Any developer with a Mac owes it to himself to check it out.

  23. Re:Windows users can compare and understand better by cshotton · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you read the reviews, you'll notice that the new OS10 borrows heavily from Windows design.

    If you actually used OS X, you'd notice that your dogma borrows heavily from Microsoft and couldn't be further from the truth.

    It would be enlightening to others following this thread if you could cite some specific examples of where OS X borrows heavily from Windows. Given that it's essentially BSD on a Mach kernel, it certainly doesn't borrow from the OS level. And since Quartz was based on the NeXT Display Postscript engine and the Finder inherited most of its functionality from previous MacOS UIs, I don't suppose you're referring to elements borrowed from Microsoft's GUI. So what is left? What have they borrowed from Microsoft for OS X?

    --

    Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
  24. Do you use laptops? by alispguru · · Score: 3, Informative

    If so, you'll like the networking, power and sleep management in OS X. Location management is excellent. You can have arbitrarily many sets of networking environments, and switching between them takes two mouse clicks, no reboot required.

    My 500 MHz iBook's wake from sleep time is two seconds, counting from the time I unlatch the lid. I reboot it only after major OS updates - the last one was July 8th. I have never lost work due to a faliure to wake from sleep.

    My battery life in the field is about three hours, mostly running emacs and developing code. I can stop in the middle of anything, close the lid, and walk away confident that I won't lose work. The machine will sleep for about two weeks on a full charge (I lose ~7% battery power per 24 hours).

    You can even safely run the battery completely dead - OS X's last gasp is to write the complete state of the machine to the hard drive, and when you find an outlet, plug in and reboot, you come back to exactly where you left off. My kids do this with full-screen games.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  25. Disconnect from Network Bug (WAS: Re:Well...) by fridgepimp · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it's not a long term solution, nor do I suggest that it is to be expected from the average user, there IS one way that those of you comfortable with the CLI can often "resolve" the spinning wheel of death. Usually, this "wheel of death" only affects the finder itself. Sometimes other apps will be slowed as well, but 9/10 times they'll respond eventually. With that in mind, the below solution often gets me out of jam with this issue.

    All mounted network volumes (at least appletalk and samba, dunno about DAV) are mounted in the /Volumes hierarchy. Depending on which one (ones?) you are dealing with do the following:

    1. open terminal.app
    2. in terminal.app run:

    % sudo umount /Volumes/

    3. Force Quit / Relaunch the Finder using the interface that pops up when you press cmd-option-esc.

    This usually works for me to remove the spinning wheel of death that is mentioned without forcing me to forceably reboot the machine.

    -fp

  26. Re:Quartz Extreme by JanusFury · · Score: 2, Informative

    Windows GDI has been hardware accelerated since like '95. Try booting Windows in VGA safe mode and see how much slower it is than 1024x768 32-bit color. The GDI architecture has a lot of features that take advantage of hardware acceleration, including stuff like bitmap scaling and alpha blending, transparent compositing, and raster shapes. Some apps can tell you exactly what 2D features your card accelerates.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  27. Re:alt tab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually, OS's 8 and 9 did that too.

    Also, just to beat anyone to the punch who wants to compair the Dock to Windows' Task bar, Look at NeXT Operating System....the Dock preceded Windows.

  28. Re:umm, hello? by ktoz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comparing Apple prices to Dell (the number 1 PC maker in the world) it becomes immediately clear that except for two configurations of the "Dimensions" line, Macs are significantly cheaper (by $496 to $2085) than comparably configured Dells. If anyone is doing the raping, it's Dell, and it made them the largest computer maker in the world!

    Synchronizing the systems:
    Comparably priced speakers were added to the Mac, Precision 530 and Precision 340 systems so that all would have the same configuration as the Dell Dimension systems. ( which automatically come with speakers )

    Optical Logitech mice were added to all Dell systems to match the Mac which ships with an optical mouse.

    V.90 modem cards were added to all Dell systems to match the Mac which automatically ships with an internal modem.

    3 Year AppleCare Protection Plan was added to Mac configurations to match the standard 3 year Dell protection plan.

    All other user configurable hardware ( except processors ) were selected to match point for point between the Macs and the Dells.

    Where possible, optional add-on software ( such as virus protection, Office Suites etc... ) has been excluded to acheive a more accurate comparison.

    None of the systems were priced with monitors.

    Apple Power Mac G4 ( tower, dual Processor )
    Mac OS 10.2 ( Juaguar ) 2 GB PC2700 DDR SDRAM
    120 GB Ultra ATA drive
    SuperDrive
    NVIDIA GeForce4 Titanium
    56K internal modem
    Standard keyboard
    Apple 1 button optical mouse
    Apple Pro Speakers ( $59 )
    3 Year AppleCare Protection Plan
    $3,757 ( Dual 867 MHz PowerPC G4 )
    $5,057 ( Dual 1.25 GHz PowerPC G4 )

    Dell Precision 530 series ( tower, dual Processor )
    Microsoft Windows XP Professional
    2 GB PC800 ECC RDRAM
    120 GB 7200RPM IDE Drive
    DVD+RW+R Combo Drive
    nVidia, Quadro4 900XGL, 128MB, VGA/DVI
    V.90 PCI Data/Fax Controllerless Modem
    Standard Keyboard
    Logitech 2 Button optical mouse
    Harman Kardon HK-395 Speakers ( $49 )
    3 Year Parts + Onsite Labor
    $5,593 ( Dual 1.8 GHz Xeon ) - $1,836 more than low end dual Mac
    $7,142 ( Dual 2.4 GHz Xeon ) - $2,085 more than high end dual Mac

    Dell Precision 340 series ( tower, single Processor )
    Microsoft Windows XP Professional
    2 GB PC800 ECC RDRAM
    120 GB 7200RPM IDE Drive
    DVD+RW+R Combo Drive
    nVidia, Quadro4 900XGL, 128MB, VGA/DVI
    V.90 PCI Data/Fax Controllerless Modem
    Standard Keyboard
    Logitech 2 Button optical mouse
    Harman Kardon HK-395 Speakers ( $49 )
    3 Year Parts + Onsite Labor
    $4,754 ( 1.7 GHz Pentium 4 ) - $997 more than low end dual Mac
    $5,553 ( 2.53 GHz Pentium 4 ) - $496 more than high end dual Mac

    Dell Dimension 8200 series ( mini-tower, single processor )
    Microsoft Windows XP Professional
    2 GB PC800 ECC RDRAM
    120 GB 7200RPM IDE Drive
    DVD+RW+R Combo Drive
    nVidia, Quadro4 900XGL, 128MB, VGA/DVI
    V.90 PCI Data/Fax Controllerless Modem
    Standard Keyboard
    Logitech 2 Button optical mouse
    Harman Kardon HK-395 Speakers ( included )
    3 Year Parts + Onsite Labor
    $3,526 ( Single 2.0 GHz Pentium 4 ) - $231 less than low end dual Mac
    $3,886 ( Single 2.53 GHz Pentium 4 ) - $1,171 less than high end dual Mac

  29. Re:Developers, Developers, Developers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    popen() is icky because it uses system(). Use pipe(), dup2(), and execlp(). This gives you control at the argv level. No annoying shell escapes to think about. (Comes in handy if you need spaces, quotes, backslashes, #s, etc., in your command line.) Others in the exec family let you change the environment too.

    int fd[2];
    pid_t child;

    pipe( fd );
    switch( (child=fork()) ) {
    case 0:
    dup( fd[1], 1 );
    execlp( "gzip", "gzip", "-c9", "foo.tar", NULL );
    exit(1);
    default:
    waitpid( child, NULL, 0 );
    }
    close( fd[1] ); /* we can now read our gzipped data from fd[0] */

    If you have problems with working with file descriptors for some odd reason, you can fdopen() fd[0] from there.

  30. Re:Graphics cards for Quartz Extreme by Gropo · · Score: 1, Informative

    I scored a Pine GeForce2MX specifically for Quartz Extreme (for my Sawtooth 500 AGP)... Flashing the ROM is apparently a breeze (though I've yet to attack mine)

    Instructions can be found here

    Though I love this comment off the site: "If you have any problems, it sux 2 B U." hehe

    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  31. Re:Developers, Developers, Developers... by sjgman9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree. Programming on Carbon (a mac os 9-x bridge thing) is hideous. Programming in windows is like running through a sewer. Programming in java is fine but you have to debug everywhere. Cocoa (objective C with the foundation and appkit frameworks, among others) is the simplest most powerful way to get programs done.

    Interface Builder.

    Try and and then respond.

  32. Re:Us recent purchasers of Macs are upset too... by mr100percent · · Score: 3, Informative
    Since you just bought a powerbook, you do get a discount. $20US for shipping and handling gives you an upgrade CD. The Mac OS X Up-to-Date Program.

  33. Re:Developers, Developers, Developers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OpenStep and NextStep which are actually is where most of Cocoa's source comes from, PREDATES and PRECEDES GNUStep, so you are not wrong, but need to get you facts straight at what Cocoa and GNUStep are.

    Also OpenStep was cross-platform, it run under Windows, Solaris, HPUX, and natively on the processors of ia32, HPPA, Sparc, and mk68K and there was usually only one binary to download for all four.