Slashdot Mirror


Meteorite Hits Girl

redcliffe writes "The BBC has a story about a 14 year old North Yorkshire girl who was hit, on the foot, by a meteorite. Where's Bruce Willis when you need him?" The young Miss Carlton notes: "This does not happen that often in Northallerton"; no doubt the City of York is where most meteorites land.

152 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. can she sue someone? by huphtur · · Score: 3, Funny

    like nasa? or fcc? or riaa?

    1. Re:can she sue someone? by jgardn · · Score: 3, Funny

      God? How would you server the papers? And what lawyer would take on God? Well... I take that last one back.

      --
      The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    2. Re:can she sue someone? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dont think the problem would be finding a layer to take on God (as they all think they are God), I think the problem is where is God going to get a layer in heaven?

      --
    3. Re:can she sue someone? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


      Sue that butterly which flapped it's wings a million years ago.

    4. Re:can she sue someone? by coryboehne · · Score: 2

      Ok, you asked for it, here's the link

    5. Re:can she sue someone? by Qrlx · · Score: 5, Funny

      http://www.netfunny.com/rhf/jokes/02/Apr/marriage. html
      Marriage in Heaven
      eyesbright@aol.comedienne (Randy Russell)
      AOL http://www.aol.com
      (chuckle, heard it)

      On their way to get married, a young couple are involved in a fatal car accident. The couple find themselves sitting outside the Pearly Gates waiting for St. Peter to process them into Heaven.

      While waiting, they begin to wonder: Could they possibly get married in Heaven? When St. Peter shows up, they asked him. St. Peter says, "I don't know. This is the first time anyone has asked. Let me go find out," and he leaves.

      The couple sat and waited for an answer. . . . for a couple of months. While they waited, they discussed that IF they were allowed to get married in Heaven, SHOULD they get married, what with the eternal aspect of it all.

      "What if it doesn't work?" they wondered, "Are we stuck together FOREVER?"

      After yet another month, St. Peter finally returns, looking somewhat bedraggled. "Yes," he informs the couple, "you CAN get married in Heaven."

      "Great!" said the couple, "But we were just wondering, what if things don't work out? Could we also get a divorce in Heaven?"

      St. Peter, red-faced with anger, slams his clipboard to the ground.

      "What's wrong?" asked the frightened couple.

      "OH, COME ON!!" St. Peter shouts, "It took me three months to find a priest up here! Do you have ANY idea how long it'll take me to find a lawyer?"

    6. Re:can she sue someone? by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      Did anyone else think of the B5 episode where some guy is sueing an alien because his grandfather was abducted by the alien's grandfather?

      Is anyone at home and so can look up the reference?

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    7. Re:can she sue someone? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "I dont think the problem would be finding a layer to take on God (as they all think they are God), I think the problem is where is God going to get a layer in heaven?"

      I dunno, but it would probably take almost as long as it would to find a lawyer in heaven ;-) I mean really, I bet the firewall at the pearly gates blocks all .ho domains.

    8. Re:can she sue someone? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      The meteor, before reaching Earth, was outside the butterfly's sphere of influence.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  2. Re:With those odds by sekensirazu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes. Except, you'd probably get a paper cut from the ticket and a subsequent deadly rare bacterial infection and die. That's not _good_ luck, getting hit by a meteorite. Oh... he got struck by lightning? Better have _him_ handle my finances. :P

  3. Transcript of article.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Funny

    she was walking all alone
    down the street in the alley
    her name was sally
    she never saw it
    when she was hit by space junk
    in new york miami beach
    heavy metal fell in cuba
    angola saudi arabia
    on xmas eve said norad
    a soviet sputnik hit africa
    india venezuela (in texas kansas)
    it's falling fast peru too
    it keeps coming
    and now i'm mad about space junk
    i'm all burned out about space junk
    oooh walk & talk about space junk
    it smashed my baby's head
    and now my sally's dead


    No. Not really. Those are the lyrics to the Devo song, "Space Junk".

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Transcript of article.... by Qrlx · · Score: 2

      You know what would be cool? If I could go out and get Space Junk by Devo on Napster right now.

      God, I miss the 90s.

  4. Re:The text of the article... in case of /. Effect by Myco · · Score: 2

    In case the BBC gets slashdotted? Um, I think they can probably handle the traffic.

  5. Re:The text of the article... in case of /. Effect by austad · · Score: 2

    The text of the article... in case of /. Effect !

    Yeah, because as we all know, the BBC regularly becomes unavailble due to the slashdot effect.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  6. Re:Somebody please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now thats a first for the internet. Someone asking for more hair on a 14 year old!! ;)

  7. And she didn't move??? by unsinged+int · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I saw it fall from above roof height," Siobhan told BBC News Online.

    And it hit her foot. Man, I see an unidentified object coming at me from above roof height and I'm getting out of the way. I'll figure out what it is later.

    But then I guess no one would write about that...

    1. Re: and she didn't move??? by stux · · Score: 2

      Or perhaps its a lump of hardened shit from when someone flushed the toilet on a 747... ...

      Yes, I've seen Joe Dirt

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
    2. Re:And she didn't move??? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would you think it would be radioactive? The vast majority of meteorites aren't.

      And it's not surprising that her leg wasn't reduced to "smoldering remains." No doubt the meteorite did get quite hot on the upper atmosphere, but by the time it got nearer ground level (and went through England's usual cloud cover ;) it had shed quite a bit of both thermal and kinetic energy. And finally -- I've found meteorites that looked very much like the one in the picture, and one of the surprising things about them is how light they are. They're not solid chunks of rock; their outer surfaces are a kind of frozen rock foam, presumably because of what happens to them on their way through the atmosphere. So I have no problem believing that one of these could hit someone on the foot without doing serious damage.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  8. Let's have a count... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So far in the last year we've had:

    - Mozilla 1.0 released

    - A story on Slashdot about how a guy switched from Linux back to Windows, XP no less

    - I got a girlfriend. (I'm man enough to admit that's not easy when you play with computers for a living)

    - Nintendo launch two game systems plus a highly anticipated title ON TIME

    - A girl getting hit by a meteorite

    Yeesh. What a year.

    1. Re:Let's have a count... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "So... what's the point? You just wanted to brag that you got a girlfriend?"

      What's the point of that question? Touch a nerve did I?

      Let's put things into perspecive here: I pointed out several things of surprise that happened over the last year. On one particular point, I implied that my acquisition (heh) of a gf was incredibly unlikely. You focused on the one about my girlfriend and mutated a poke at my own general repulsiveness into an attempt to sound like a player.

      So did I use this thread to brag about my girlfriend, or are you using it because you're mad at me for having one? It seems to me that you are the one with an issue, not I.

  9. How to get your photo in the news by Myco · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Get a rock
    2. Say it's a meteorite that hit you on the foot.
    3. BBC believes you, publishes goofy photo of you holding your "meteorite"
    4. ???
    5. Profit

    Alternately, all your beowulf cluster of meteorite are belong to us.

    Yeah, that should about cover it.

    1. Re:How to get your photo in the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now if you had just mentioned 9/11 somehow, I could have won SlashBingo on one foul swoop. Perhaps "Iraq testing meteorites as weapons of mass desctruction".

    2. Re:How to get your photo in the news by mlong · · Score: 2, Funny
      Don't forget to bake it in the oven first.

      1. Get a rock

      2. Say it's a meteorite that hit you on the foot.

      3. BBC believes you, publishes goofy photo of you holding your "meteorite"

      4. ???

      5. Profit

      --
      //m
    3. Re:How to get your photo in the news by pogen · · Score: 2
      Don't forget to bake it in the oven first.

      That would be a dead giveaway. Meteorites aren't usually hot when they reach the ground. Sometimes, they're so cold that they're covered in frost.

    4. Re:How to get your photo in the news by mlong · · Score: 2
      That would be a dead giveaway. Meteorites aren't usually hot when they reach the ground. Sometimes, they're so cold that they're covered in frost.

      Yeah but what do news people know about that? You just say "Look it hit me in my foot, and its still warm. Want to feel it?"

      --
      //m
  10. Other Nigh-infinitely Rare Occurances... by Bonker · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Hillary Rosen or Jack Valenti mention that the mp3 format or P2P file-sharing networks may not be as evil as the dripping semen of Beelzebub. ...Stallman accidentally says 'Linux' in a moment of pique rather than 'Gnu/Linux'. ...The software or media industry creates an truly uncrackable format for copy-protecting the data on CD's ...Taco posts a story to the front page of Slashdot without a single spelling error on his part. ...Natalie Portman does not run screaming from anything that looks remotely like a nerd. ...A new Slashdot reader goes six months without perma-filtering JonKatz.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  11. Not the first time . . . by loraksus · · Score: 2

    I dunno, I somehow doubt this would be legit, I'd expect the asteroid to come out of the sky going a lot faster - hell, terminal velocity for a human body is like 400kph (could be mph / completely wrong), this thing would probably have a lot less drag and I'm sure that you wouldnt be able to see it fall. Any physics people want to correct me?
    I wonder if this is like me holding quarters about a lighter for 30 seconds and throwing them in a crowd. . . not that I've ever done that. . .

    I find it kinda cool that nobody (*in recorded history*) has ever been killed by a meteorite.
    If you're bored, /. this guy's server and kill some asteroids.
    http://www.brudirect.com/LighterSide/G ames/game%20 asteroid%20shower.htm

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Not the first time . . . by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I would have also thought that a meteorite would plough into whatever it hit and bury itself, but maybe not. When I was about 8 years old, I found a meteorite laying on the grass in front of our house. It was the iron type and quite heavy for its size (a bit less than an inch across). Unfortunately, it got lost in a move a few years later. :(

      In other weird stuff in the sky, a few years ago I happened to see an incoming meteor (magnesium by the brilliance) that in the few seconds it was visible, was large enough to show a disk to the naked eye, and it lit up the landscape about the same as would a major lightning strike. Good thing it burned up on the way down :)

      BTW, there've been a few cases of people who fell off a building, and at least one who fell out of an airplane, and survived a long fall with minimal injuries. It's a bird.. it's a plane... *splat*

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Not the first time . . . by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find it kinda cool that nobody (*in recorded history*) has ever been killed by a meteorite.

      I always thought that too, but while googling for a picture of the Peekskill Meteorite car, I stumbled on this page, which shows at least three separate incidents where a person was killed by a meteorite. None have happened recently, though.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:Not the first time . . . by coryboehne · · Score: 2

      I like this quote from that page
      September 5, 1907 Hsin-p ai Wei, Weng-li, China A whole family was reportedly crushed by a meteorite. Now, if that isn't bad luck. Besides how friggin big was the damn thing? A whole family?

    4. Re:Not the first time . . . by NeMon'ess · · Score: 4, Informative

      From an issue of Maxim:

      Someone wrote in asking if a penny dropped from the empire state building could kill someone on the ground. A physicist contacted by Maxim suggested fastening g a length of string to the penny and holding it out the window of a moving car. When the penny is at 45 degrees, check the spedometer and that is a very rough estimate of the object's terminal velocity. Maxim's penny only had a rough terminal velocity of 16mph. The metorite could be similar. We still don't know its speed entering the atmosphere and how long it took to fall through.

    5. Re:Not the first time . . . by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I find it kinda cool that nobody (*in recorded history*) has ever been killed by a meteorite.

      I guess that depends if you buy into the theory that a meteorite caused the last ice age and wiped out most life on the planet...

    6. Re:Not the first time . . . by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [laughing] Well, this was without a parachute. The one I heard about falling out of a plane, the altitude at the time was about 3000 feet, and the guy broke both his legs but that's all the damage he took. Pretty lucky!

      When I was a baby, I climbed out of the playpen and clonked myself on the head. My mom, being the paranoid new mother type, rushed me to the doctor. He said, "Don't worry about it. Last week my kid jumped out a 2nd floor window!"

      (Yes, I *was* dropped on my head when I was very small, why do you ask? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Not the first time . . . by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    8. Re:Not the first time . . . by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Depends on how it hits and whether it breaks something, squishes nerves out of commission, or whatever. Once when I was chopping wood, a forearm-sized chunk flew up and smacked me across the forehead so hard that I literally saw stars (see, I'm on topic :) and almost blacked out -- but it didn't hurt at all! Guess my head is harder than it looks. Must be all those "getting hit on the head" lessons. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Not the first time . . . by alexjohns · · Score: 2

      So, you're telling us you buy Maxim for the Physics articles? Yeah, right. Still not buying it...

    10. Re:Not the first time . . . by Reziac · · Score: 2

      That's nothing.. in college I had a dumb roommate. Dumb roommate flung training dummy over a 100 foot cliff. Othric (one of my 1970s retriever pack) went over the cliff after it, tumble-and-thump all the way down, but apparently not hurt since he got the dummy and climbed back up (the long way round, of course).

      Did I mention I had a dumb roommate? Rinse and repeat. Dog didn't hurt himself this time either. Dumb roommate would have done it a 3rd time, except I grabbed dog and dummy and held onto both. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Not the first time . . . by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      that's funny, but no. It was in Maxim's AvantGo PDA page just a week ago. No pictures unfortunately.

  12. Possible, but unlikely. Abilation is key. by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article: .Noticing it was "quite hot", she showed it to her father Niel.

    The problem with this is that meteors are not hot. See this link and this one. From the first link:

    Objects from space that enter Earth's atmosphere are -- like space itself -- very cold and they remain so even as they blaze a hot-looking trail toward the ground. "The outer layers are warmed by atmospheric friction, and little bits flake away as they descend," explains Yeomans. This is called ablation and it's a wonderful way to remove heat. (Some commercial heat shields use ablation to keep spacecraft cool when they re-enter Earth's atmosphere.) "Rocky asteroids are poor conductors of heat," Yeomans continued. "Their central regions remain cool even as the hot outer layers are ablated away."

    And from the second:

    Are asteroids hot or cold as they descend through Earth's atmosphere? (Level II, They are cold as they enter and remain so even as they blaze a hot-looking trail toward the ground. The outer layers are warmed by friction and little bits flake away as they descend.)

    So I suppose it is part of abilated material if it is real, that would explain why it was hot. That would probably still make it a meteor. It might also explain why she still owns her foot.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    1. Re:Possible, but unlikely. Abilation is key. by kindbud · · Score: 3, Informative

      How many times must you cut and paste the word before you realize that "ablation" is not spelled with the letter "i"?

      A-B-L-A-T-I-O-N
      A-B-L-A-T-E-D :)

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Possible, but unlikely. Abilation is key. by Physics+Dude · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ever hear the phrase "Don't believe everything you read"?

      The sources you quote are a lot of rehashed BS. Note how the wording is nearly identical in each. Obviously copied by someone who doesn't have a clue about physics... (probably just a Ph.D. ;)

      "... very cold and they remain so even as they blaze a hot-looking trail ..."

      hot-looking??? Just what do they think is causing all that bright white light to be given off anyway? It's called BLACK BODY RADIATION! It means that the surface of the object emitting the light is thousands of degrees. The specific temperature can be determined directly from the light's most intensely emitted frequency.

      Most meteorites litterally burn up in the atmosphere on re-entry, leaving at mosts tiny specs that fall as dust. These are solid rock and iron and their surfaces don't just flake off like a piece of pie crust.

      Now, the core temperature of the object and it's temperature on impact is another matter, but those quotes are WAY off base.

    3. Re:Possible, but unlikely. Abilation is key. by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      The ablation theory sounds cool, but how did they determine that is what actually happens? Certainly nobody's sitting out in a field somewhere with a chisel and a thermometer waiting for meteorites to crash down around them.

  13. Re:[rant] They could have written _something_ by Myco · · Score: 2
    Hear, hear. It seems like they just took a bunch of quotes from the girl and her dad, and a handful of incredibly obvious scientific observations, and shuffled them around randomly.

    You know you're in trouble when the most exciting subheading you can come up with is "shiny." Oooh, shiny. Jebus.

  14. Re:hmm by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's possible this isn't a meteorite. It would have hurt (but probably not much more than having the same rock thrown at you); since the article didn't mention it, I assume she was undamaged by the impact. Perhaps it hit her after a bounce.

    Anyway, the thing that caught me was that she said it was hot to the touch. Small meteorites tend to be cold by the time they hit the ground. They are mostly iron, so they conduct heat well, and cool off fast in the upper atmosphere.

    And she said it looked "rusty". Meteorites are black; they can't oxidize in space.
    It will be interesting to see if there's a follow-up on this.

    BTW, here is a picture of a car in NY that was hit by a 12.5-kg meteorite in 1995. Ouch!

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  15. Very light on the details.... by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if

    1. Re:Very light on the details.... by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is something wrong with slashdot lately? My posts keep getting truncated.

    2. Re:Very light on the details.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      no there are no proble

    3. Re:Very light on the details.... by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 3, Funny
      I wonder if

      Whoa! What are the changes of a second meteorite hitting a Slashdot reader while he is commenting a meteorite story?!!?

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
  16. Re:no holes? by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 2

    If it's small (as it is), then the surface area to volumn ratio will be large enough so that it has a slow terminal velocity. No crater, no holes in feet. Drop a rock like that from a high building, and you are unlikely to harm anyone unless you get them in the eye.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  17. Have you hugged your air today? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* I'd expect the asteroid to come out of the sky going a lot faster - hell, terminal velocity for a human body is like 400kph *)

    It is probably hard to say without more analysis of that particular rock. The atmosphere slows rocks down. How much the atmosphere slowed it depends on a lot of factors like its orginal speed, angle of entry, composition, shape, etc.

    It is possible that it was falling at a regular "dropping" velocity once slowed to the minimum for the atmospheric drag. IOW, lost almost all of its "space" velocity.

    Gotta love our atmosphere.

  18. Re:With those odds by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would have to disagree, the girl did nothing to cause her situation, this guy is a darwin award waiting to happen....

    --
  19. Re:hmm by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

    No, I don't know what he's holding but the meteorite that hit that car weighed close to 30 pounds (12.5 kg).

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  20. Huh? by kreyg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The stone could have come from Mars, according to expert on Earth impacts Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University.

    What was the purpose of this paragraph? It just comes out of nowhere, and the subject abruptly dropped. Is there some reason to believe it might be from Mars, rather than, say, anywhere else? Does it matter? Was the reporter concerned that the Martians were hurling rocks at little girls' feet?

    It just struck me as though this reporter didn't have the faintest clue what they were reporting on, but remembered some buzz about meteors from Mars a few years back...

    --
    sig fault
    1. Re:Huh? by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was slightly amused by that too. By reading the picture texts, you didn't get too much confidence in the article: "I saw it fall from above roof height" and "The stone may have come from Mars"... *sigh* :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Huh? by Zarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      The stone could have come from Mars, according to expert on Earth impacts Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University

      I speculate, aswell, that the stone could be the fore-front of the Martian Invasion of Earth! To arms, to arms! The Martians are coming! The Martians are coming!

      By the way of England of course. Was it three if by air and four if by space?

      --
      [signature]
    3. Re:Huh? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      The stone could have come from Mars, according to expert on Earth impacts Dr Benny Peiser, of Liverpool John Moores University.

      The stone could be a charcoal briquette that fell off the roof next door--the college students in the adjacent building were having one last barbecue before going back to school.

      One of the students was being severely beaten by his friends for posting a message to Slashdot containing the phrase "3. Profit!!!". When his head hit the grill, the briquette was ejected over the edge of the roof.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Huh? by FozzTexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ackack ack ack ackack! Ack ack ackackack ack ack ackackackack ack ack! Ack ack ackack!

      Or something like that.

    5. Re:Huh? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Of course be way of england! That is well Documented.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Gender bias? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    It was a girl. Hmmmm.

    I have read that males are something like 3 times more likely to get hit by lightning than females.

    One theory is that men are more likely to have outdoor jobs (ranger, cop, ditch digger, etc.)

    Another theory is that men are too bull-headed to come in from storms.

    1. Re:Gender bias? by gvonk · · Score: 2

      [/me cringes as the Female League of Ditch Diggers hits their collective reply button]

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    2. Re:Gender bias? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* men are not 3 times as likely to get hit by lightning than women. i think you mean to say that 3 times are many men have been struck by lightning than women. don't post any more statistics until you understand the difference, ok? *)

      I admit that I don't see the difference right now. I may not be interpreting you right. Unless you are suggesting that the rate is changing and that history is not a good predicter of current rates?

    3. Re:Gender bias? by Debillitatus · · Score: 2
      People who flame about mathematics are amusing.

      People who flame about mathematics, when they're wrong, are even more so.

      Literally, the statement that "men are 3 times more likely to be hit by meteorites" means that you expect, in the future, that out of all meteorite-human collisions, 3 out of 4 will be men. The fact that heretofore, 3 out of 4 have been men is a reasonable suggestion that this will continue to be true, especially if you have no reason to expect that this will change. The original poster was correct.

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

    4. Re:Gender bias? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Or it could be that males are 3 times as likely to have heads with a solid iron core ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Gender bias? by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      Whomever wrote about the statistical difference was being either 1) pedantic or 2) a jerk. That's an inclusive-or, by the way.

      Using historical data you can make estimates of probability. Because we don't have a *perfect* model for the events being described, we'll never know the desired p.d.f. and never have any "statistical truth" about the matter. If you wanted to make the complainer happy, you'd have to choose a statistical model, then devise and justify a fitting procedure for that model. Then you could argue that, under your model, some event had a certain probability. At this point, the complainer would tell you that your model was stupid, and that you were stupid, etc.

      -Paul Komarek

    6. Re:Gender bias? by Debillitatus · · Score: 2

      Which means, exactly, that men would be more likely to be hit. This is what the original poster said.

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

  22. how is that possible by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    Going by the standards of metiorites this one is *big* considering most are dust spec sized. But the fact is if such a metiorite comes to earh and hits it will burn a long long hole.
    Now even if some argues that it was slowed down by air, still it could have a terminal verlocity of 120Lm/hr atleast and it would be damn hot. It would burn a hole right through her foot!
    PRobably it is something else.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:how is that possible by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Due to the ablatince nature of a meteor moving through the earths atmosphere, there not real very hot at all.
      most people hit be metiorites live, usually with no long standing injury.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:how is that possible by Reziac · · Score: 2

      As I mention in another post, when I was a kid I found an iron meteorite (not quite an inch across) in our front yard, just lying on the grass. It hadn't been there very long, as it was still hot to the touch, but not hot enough to even wilt the grass under it or blister your finger.

      I'd guess if you run the physics, you'll find that the depth of the hole, if any, has more to do with mass than temperature, and the result of a large mass would be a shockwave crater (such as the one in Arizona), not a "long long hole."

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Terminal velocity by ciurana · · Score: 3, Informative

    d00D,

    Terminal velocity for an average human body is only about 110 mi/h, or about 175 km/h, give or take a few ds/dt. Maybe top off at 200 mi/h if you really try.

    A meteorite might go a bit faster, provided it is somewhat round. It will also be rather hot due to friction.

    I thought I'd share this with you.

    Cheers!

    E

    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    1. Re:Terminal velocity by XNormal · · Score: 2

      A meteorite might go a bit faster

      Not necessarily. Gravitational pull is proportional to mass, drag is proportional to area. Mass grows at 3rd power, area at 2nd power. Therefore smaller objects fall more slowly in an atmosphere.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    2. Re:Terminal velocity by XNormal · · Score: 2

      I was using everyday terms. By "gravitationa pull" meant the force you call "weight", not acceleration.

      This force really is proportional to the mass:

      f = mass*g = volume*density*g = K*size^3*density*g where g is the Earth gravitational acceleration at sea level and K depends on the shape of the object (it's 1 for cubes).

      Nobody needs to turn in any grave.

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  24. Man bites dog! by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "In a related story, a man broke into a local astronomy museum and smashed the glass on the meteorite exhibits and started pounding the contents. Police said he was claiming retaliation for 'that poor little girl's foot'."

    Promise you won't ask me to verify this story.

    The dynosours are still pissed also, I bet.

  25. Re:With those odds by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey man, consider her lucky... she could have been killed. I mean, what do you think would have happened if she, say, was hiding out in Flanders' bomb shelter?

  26. Impossible by Xavier000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this possible? I remember reading about a meteorite that hit a dam in Australia a few years ago. It evaporated the lake, and when scientists sifted through the mud, the meteorite was only the size of a marble.

    Remembering my high school physics, all things of the same mass will fall through the earth at the same speed, assuming they are aeorodynamically equivalent, beccause they have the same terminal velocity.

    This girl's foot would be pulverised if it was hit by some space junk of that size that had just fallen through earth's atmosphere.
    It seems obvious that this is not a meteorite at all. If it was, she would probably only have one leg. The only slim possibility I can imagine, is if the meteorite was so full of bubbles that it came to earth with the characteristics of foam. Unlikely given the photo they have shown.

    1. Re:Impossible by Arandir · · Score: 2

      This is not the first time a meteorite hit a person, and the person survived.

      It depends on the mass of the meteorite. Too small and it burns up. Too big and it creates a tourist trap in Arizona. But at the right mass, it will hit like a rock dropped from an airplane. That's because the atmosphere will slow it down. It WILL hurt when it hits. But it's entirely possible that it can hit a girl's foot without removing it.

      But what about your high school physic's teacher? He too busy reading physics texts and not enough time looking at the real world. In college we performed the classic physics experiment that no one ever performs: we dropped a watermelon and a grape from the top of a building. The standard physics text says that they will both hit at the same time. But the watermelon hit first! I leave it as an exercise to the reader to figure out why...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:Impossible by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Due to the ablatince nature of a meteor moving through the earths atmosphere, there not real very hot at all.
      most people hit be metiorites live, usually with no long standing injury.

      there are many site that explain why this is possible, and how it happens.
      I bet your teacher also believes water runs 'backwords' in the southern hemisphere to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. Re:Stupid People... by gilroy · · Score: 2
    Blockquoth the poster:

    Well if they knew anything, they should know that the majority of all meteorites that fall to earth are COLD to the touch when they hit earth, do to the fact that they are 'burning' so fast when they enter the atmosphere that the heat doesnt transfer to the core of the meteor.

    Um, doesn't the fact that "the majority of all meteorites" are cold imply that some, at least, are not cold? (I suppose technically not necessarily -- 100% is also a majority -- but it's an extremely unusual way to say it.) And unless the good people of the Hayden Planetarium were lying to me all those years ago, I've seen meteorites that were pitted and melted.


    It can be a 1 in 10^9 occurance and still occur...

  28. Re:no holes? by coryboehne · · Score: 3

    In all fairness, have you ever thrown a rock from any real height? I just did an experiment, I went up to the roof of my building and dropped a rock (about 1.5" dia, solid composition) off the top (12 story, actually 14 to the street), and it hit so damn hard that it blew apart. Now, tell me this would'nt hurt... The only way this may have not hurt is if the thing had enough holes in it to lighten it enough to not hurt you... which is doubtful considering that the iron content is usually way up there.

  29. This girl WAS hit by a meteorite by jukal · · Score: 2

    Apparently, this is the only documented case in which a meteorite has hit someone. Now, that must hurt!

    1. Re:This girl WAS hit by a meteorite by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      (* Apparently, this [positron-press.co.uk] is the only documented case in which a meteorite has hit someone. Now, that must hurt! *)

      I don't mean to be cruel, for I could use the same advice, but if that lady in the hospital photo lost a some weight, it looks like the stone would have *missed* her rather large tummy.

      The physics are simple: Bigger people are bigger targets.

      Perhaps we should start sleeping standing up to present a smaller target profile area. Our foil hats will stay on better that way also.

    2. Re:This girl WAS hit by a meteorite by tconnors · · Score: 2

      I don't mean to be cruel, for I could use the same advice, but if that lady in the hospital photo lost a some weight, it looks like the stone would have *missed* her rather large tummy.

      The physics are simple: Bigger people are bigger targets.


      In high energy physics, a particle with a lot of mass tends to have more of something with call cross-section, analagous to a size you give a physical ball. So you are saying this woman is a high energy particle? Can I throw neutrons at her? Will they bounce back and hit me in the face, just like in Thompson scattering?

  30. Re:Tiny meteorite by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    It wasn't even the size of her hand! Come on, Slashdot!

    Yeah, come on Slashdot! We want to see BLOOD like in the news channels! Try again when you have some news about a meteorite crushing a girl. That would be something... mwahahaha! :-P

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  31. Anthropemorphic bias by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    From the meteorite's perspective, it got hit by a fast-moving girl.

    Imagine being a rock drifting thru space. (Don't tell my boss, but I do it all day).

    Out of nowhere a big blue ball appears and keeps getting bigger and bigger until a human foot smacks you right in the keaster.

    The daily newspaper for meteorites, The Rock Chronicles[1], right now probably has a story running titled, "Human Foot Hits Citizen".

    [1] I don't know if they have "Rolling Stone" there.

    1. Re:Anthropemorphic bias by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      It is *clear* that the asteroid accellerated toward the big, blue sphere-like object and hit an object standing on it's surface.

      The space rock would not "feel" the pull of the Earth. We only feel gravity because the surface is keeping us from reaching our "natural" excelleration. Or as Einstein would possibly say, the surface prevents us from "going with the flow" of the space-time-gravity distortion framework.

      Further, technically both bodies (the Earth and the rock) *mutually* attract each other. It is just that the Earth has the bigger pull.

      Further 2, it may not have been Earth's gravity that landed it there. It could have simply been headed for Earth regardless of gravity. Gravity is *not a prerequisite* for such collisions. It may increase the chances of it though.

    2. Re:Anthropemorphic bias by freek_daddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's some really excellent total nonsense you've got going there. I especially liked "natural" excelleration and space-time-gravity distortion framework.

      I'm gonna guess - you watch a lot of Star Trek and take it easy on the physics books, right?

    3. Re:Anthropemorphic bias by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* That's some really excellent total nonsense you've got going there. I especially liked "natural" excelleration and space-time-gravity distortion framework. *)

      It is not "nonsense". I just don't know how else to describe it without going into fat detail.

      By "natural excelleration", I mean drifting with the pull of gravity. IOW, weightlessness. We feel the pull because the surface is pushing against that pull. But without being stopped by a surface, we would have no way to sense Earth's gravity.

      My Einstein reference was to the fact that excelleration and gravity are indistinquishable from the observer if they can't look around. Einstein postulates that they are really one in the same.

  32. Re:Stupid People... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

    It doesn't matter - it was just a fluff news story designed to make people feel good, with a suitably spunky heroine. It's in the national media and forms part of our culture now. Wouldn't be surprised to see art films next year about misunderstood young women getting hit by meteorites.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  33. no, you are not a rocket scientist. by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Funny

    but from what I've learned, small rocks falling from outer space burn up in a brief little fireball, and big rocks falling from outer space MAKE GIANT FUCKING HOLES IN THE GROUND.

    What about medium sized rocks, smartass?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:no, you are not a rocket scientist. by kyletinsley · · Score: 2, Funny
      but from what I've learned, small rocks falling from outer space burn up in a brief little fireball, and big rocks falling from outer space MAKE GIANT FUCKING HOLES IN THE GROUND.

      What about medium sized rocks, smartass?

      Let's see if we can theorize what happens in the middle, given the two outer extremes. A) Small rock = completely destroyed in a ball of fire. B) Large rock = Makes big ball of fire, part of it survives & creates big explosion when it smacks into the ground, destroying other rocks along with itself...

      Now you're suggesting that C) Medium-sized rock = no fireball, no explosion, no crater... just taps a girl on the foot and she picks it up and notices it's kinda hot... Yes, that makes absolute perfect sense, Mr. Spock.

    2. Re:no, you are not a rocket scientist. by Daetrin · · Score: 2

      Or how bout, makes medium big ball of fire (when it was higher up in the atmosphere) and then lands on a girls foot? You're getting kinda caught up in that whole either/or thing. There's no magic size where below it a meteor completly disintigrates and above it it causes a giant crater :)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    3. Re:no, you are not a rocket scientist. by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      But aren't you then assuming that there is a "magic size" at which the meteor will neither burn up completely nor cause massive impact damage?

      Nope, not making that assumption at all. I'm assuming that there is a wide range of meteor sizes and speeds, both before and after entering the atmosphere. Terminal velocity for a rock that size is probably somewhere on the order of 10 - 50 mph, enough to hurt if it hit you, but probably not enough to do any serious damage (given it's small size)

      Terminal velocity for a meteor large enough to make a crater is much higher. And because of it's larger mass it may also have not had time to bleed off enough energy to slow down to terminal velocity by the time it hits. Larger object with higher speed equals more damage. Smaller rock has lower speed, not much damage. Even smaller rock burns up completly and the dust gently floats to the ground and no one even notices.

      Looking at the meteorites in scientific collections there seem to be quite a large number of them that are in that size range, large enough to survive entry, but not large enough to cause any real damamge.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  34. "roof height" by evilviper · · Score: 2
    "I saw it fall from above roof height,"


    Hmmmmmmmmm. *evil grin*

    If you will excuse me, I need to get a bucket of volcanic rocks, and climb up on my neighbor's roof.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:"roof height" by redcliffe · · Score: 2

      Meteorites are easy to distinguish from terrestial rocks, and this one is consistant with being one. Maybe someone who already had it chucked it at her? Anyway, it was an easy way for me to get an article posted front page :-).

  35. Space Rock?? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
  36. Credibility by digitaltraveller · · Score: 2

    I'm getting far too cynical in my old age, but I just don't believe it. First, as the article pointed out, the odds are huge. I'd like to think this was a scientist teaching his daughter how easily the foolish media is manipulated. Eg. Like Joey Skaggs does. The meteorite in the picture appears to be about the size of her 14 year old thumb. She states: "I saw it fall from above roof height". We don't know her height, and the distance to the roof, so we can't calculate the arc tangent. Let's say she was staring into the sky with her head tilted at a 60 degrees angle upwards. (an odd angle for a head to be at). Also, her head was also staring in the CORRECT direction (360 degrees) and SPOTTED the meteorite, and still it hit her?
    Hmmm. Kids do like to exaggerate when something happens to them. Possible, but astronomically unprobable.

  37. Why no permanent foot damage? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't this thing have easily pierced through her foot and kept going into the ground with some momentum to spare? I guess she could have been wearing steel-toed boots, but I seriously doubt it. I'm slightly skeptical of this, as it probably should have destroyed her foot.

    1. Re:Why no permanent foot damage? by ahrenritter · · Score: 2

      Is there any scientific backup to the common conception that these tiny meteorites are traveling at a higher than terminal velocity? I could drop a peanut sized pebble from ten miles up, and if it hit my foot, it wouldn't do anything more than bounce off...

      --

      All I wanted was a rock to wind a piece of string around, and I ended up with the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota
    2. Re:Why no permanent foot damage? by ahrenritter · · Score: 2

      So upon doing a little more research, the real question is how frequently meteorites of this size would have enough time for their inertia to bleed away to TV.

      --

      All I wanted was a rock to wind a piece of string around, and I ended up with the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota
    3. Re:Why no permanent foot damage? by ahrenritter · · Score: 2

      I wasn't meaning to indicate I thought TV was a constant like c or something. I was questioning whether the object was traveling faster than its TV would normally be at that moment in time.

      --

      All I wanted was a rock to wind a piece of string around, and I ended up with the biggest ball of twine in Minnesota
  38. News? by mblumber · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dog bites man: Not news.
    Man bites dog: News.
    Meteorite hits girl: Not news.
    Girl falls from sky, hits meteorite: Now there's a story!

    --
    Anyone who posts about bad moderation are themselves off-topic and should be moderated accordingly.
  39. Re:hmm by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    BTW, here [nyrockman.com] is a picture of a car in NY that was hit by a 12.5-kg meteorite in 1995. Ouch!
    Woah, and look what it did to the car's owner! He looks really messed up. Worse than the car.
  40. Wow! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    When I first read the subject line, I thought "woah, someone actually got wasted by an intergalatic rock". Then I find out some 14 year-old got hit by a rock the size of a peanut and we're all supposed to find that interesting?

    Where's the interesting news?

  41. Dateline: The Bizzaro World by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

    August 24, 2002

    A small girl fell up from Bizzaro today striking and obliterating a large meteor. Debris from the impact is expected to reach Earth sometime next week.

  42. Somebody has to say it: by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine getting hit by a beowoulf cluster of these...

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  43. Re:With those odds by g00dn3ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate it when news stories give stupid statistics like that.

    How do they know the odds of being hit by a meteor. The odds of winning a lottery are probably pretty predictable because a lottery is defined as having only a small number of randomly chosen winners.

    We have no such assurance with meteors on the other hand. Who's to say that the Earth won't pass through some huge asteroid field. Then the chances of being struck by a meteor could suddenly skyrocket.

    "In this context, isn't it obvious that Chicken Little represents the sane vision?"

    --
    ... rice, rice, gravy ...
  44. Nope by wirefarm · · Score: 2


    More men golf.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  45. I wonder... by plaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a newspaper here in Finland it said it fell at her feet, not that it actually hit her. I'd say it's quite probable it didn't hit her, but the reporter streched the story a bit to give it a better twing. When you read the article, it very quickly gets over the point of it actually hitting her.

    Also (as mentioned in another comment) the point of it being from Mars is totally bogus. Probably the "expert" they interviewed mentioned that some meteorites can come from Mars, and the reporter immediately picked it up, saying "The stone may have come from Mars."

    --

    I doubt, therefore I may be.
  46. fake? by SeanAhern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a good chance that this might be a hoax.

  47. Mrs. Hodges: "But mine was much bigger" by Montezuma58 · · Score: 2, Informative

    About the only documented meteorite/human collision from 10 FUN THINGS TO DO IN AND AROUND SYLACAUGA

    "In 1954, Mrs. Ann Hodges, who was napping on her couch, was awakened very suddenly when a meteorite penetrated her roof and struck her on the thigh. The Hodges or Sylacauga meteorite, which weighs 8.5 pounds and is 7 by 5 inches in diameter, can be viewed in replica form at the museum. The original is in the Alabama Museum of Natural History in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Sylacauga is listed in the Guinness Book of World Records since this is the only case of a meteorite hitting a living person."

    Althoug she was not hit directly. The meteorite bounced of some other junk in her house before striking her.

  48. Re:With those odds by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First Great Eastern say they decided to publish the picture "out of sheer frustration" in an attempt to stop teenagers climbing onto the tracks.

    Yeah that's smart, show a picture of a guy doing something incredibly dangerous and stupid, and getting away with it. Now they made it into a sport. (Let's call it platformhumping)

    Better show them this too.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  49. I don't believe it... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's see if I've got this right:

    No corroborating evidence at all except the word of the adolescent girl herself. Nobody else saw it. Nobody but she can testify that it was warm.

    They say they "plan" to have the stone analyzed by scientists, but it hasn't happened yet.

    Even the scientist couldn't prove that someone hadn't warmed up a meteorite and pitched it over the rooftops.

    I have no doubt Charles Fort would put this in his newspaper clippings file, but the only thing that's remarkable about this to me is that the BBC would publish it.

    I bet a nickel that there's never even any followup story reporting on any scientist's report on the meteorite. I can just see the family in their car on their way to the university and the embarrassed kid 'fesses up.

    1. Re:I don't believe it... by T-Punkt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Nobody but she can testify that it was warm.

      Actually this is the #1 reason I don't think she was hit by this meteorite - it's a common missconception that meteorites are hot when they hit the earth. There's an FAZ article about common myths about meteorites.

      The #2 reason: Even a small piece of iron/rock like this, falling from more than 100m height surely would break a girl's foot if it hits it.

      My guess: She bought the meteorite via internet and maybe it fell on her foot when she opened the package...

    2. Re:I don't believe it... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Some points:

      It would be warm because the outside would be warm, however it would be cold inside. It disappates heat through an ablative process, but there will be a point where it will be hot, but not how enough to shed any outer material.

      people have been hit be bigger meteorites and lived. In some caes with no more then a large bruise.

      You could be right, and it is a fraud, but it could happen the way she described it.

      I'll be cynical about corps, and Gov't, but I choose to believe some 14 year old girl. At least until my little girl is 14...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. York, City of Meteorites by __davep · · Score: 2, Informative
    no doubt the City of York is where most Meteorites land

    Some people seem to think so. Sadly, such impacts generally turn out to have far more mundane explanations.

  51. Re:hmm by Shimbo · · Score: 3, Informative
    They are mostly iron, so they conduct heat well, and cool off fast in the upper atmosphere...

    And she said it looked "rusty". Meteorites are black; they can't oxidize in space.

    Presumably that it where the speculation that it may be Martian in origin originates. One might expect Mars crust to be both stony and oxidised. Martian meteorites are pretty rare though, so it makes the story more unlikely. It's barely possible though.

    "Gentlemen, I would rather believe that two Yankee professors would lie than believe that stones fall from heaven." -- Thomas Jefferson

  52. Indeed by Scooter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree - it's the worst type of superficial repetitive "journalism" - just repeating the headline over and over with increasing numbers of filler words - the BBC should know better.

    You kno what happens - they phone some guy in a University and repeatedly ask "could it have come from Mars?" "Well yeah - I guess" says the guy (thinking "it could have come from anywhere - I haven't seen it, have no idea of it;s composition, but I can't say no") Next thing, he's being quoted in some half arsed article as saying "it could have come from Mars"

    You gotta laff at TV news programmes (it may be on a web site but the BBC is a TV outfit)- they never tell you anything but the obvious.

  53. In other news... by merlyn · · Score: 2
    • "First time player wins the lottery"
    • "The Cubs take the pennant"
    • "The RIAA decides to back off on all future requests for digital rights management"
    • "Microsoft calls it quits, gives up willingly to the DOJ"
    • "Moderators create a new category for this post: brilliant"
  54. Re:With those odds by 2sheds · · Score: 2

    "If it had been one of our modern trains he would certainly have been killed."

    Fairly good odds on surviving, then!

    j.

    --

    Absit Invidia
  55. I can remember... by RobinH · · Score: 2

    ... back when I was in high school, there was a local story about a meteorite landing in the back yard of this guy in London, Ontario. They even interviewed a geologist from the local University of Western Ontario who said he was 75% certain it was a meteorite. Later he retracted his comment:

    Blob no meteorite
    A strange blob that an expert believed plummeted
    from the heavens suddenly became less alien yesterday
    after it was found to be a lump of asphalt covered
    with paint. "I'm kind of embarrassed," said David
    Dilon, a member of the University of Western
    Ontario's geology department, who said he had been 75
    percent certain the object was a meteorite.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  56. Re:With those odds by Xaoswolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, sure she was hit by a meteorite, but I would expect that thing to leave a crator where she stood, or at the very least mangle her foot a little. I didn't even see anything about light bruising in the article.

  57. Hmmmm... by pr0t3uS · · Score: 2, Funny

    If she turns into the METEOR GIRL Hollywood will probably sue her for copyright violation.

  58. The stone may have come from Mars by squaretorus · · Score: 2

    Well... why are we always told these things 'may have come from mars'. It may also have come from Earth, or any other chunk of rock floating about out there.

    Hey - it might have come from mars - it might be a fossilised martian poop!

  59. Re:hmm by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2
    "Sometimes they have shallow depressions and cavities," he said.

    Was that about the rocks or the victims?
    That car sure looks like it had a nice new cavity, I sure want to see her foot.

  60. Fireball by wiredog · · Score: 2

    I've seen a couple of those. From what I've read a meteorite large enough to appear that size is actually about the size of a soccer ball.

    1. Re:Fireball by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Likely so. I imagine most of the visible "disk" was actually burning gassified magnesium, not solid matter. It was bright enough to cause a brief bit of flash blindness, even thru closed eyelids!!

      I've since seen a couple more myself, but nothing quite so spectacular. Probably the only reason this one didn't make the news is that it came along at 4am west coast time, and was out over the ocean so probably not widely visible. I only saw it because I got home real late (er, early) and was wandering down to the road to pick up the morning paper.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  61. Re:hmm by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I'm thinking an object of that size hitting you after falling through the entire atmosphere ought to have been going fast enough to go right through her foot. Every time I've visited the deep canyons of the western United States, I've seen warnings all over the place not to throw even small rocks over the edge, as they will be going fast enough by the time they reach the bottom to seriously injure someone. Think about the size of a bullet and then contemplate that this rock should have been moving even faster than that.

    -9.80665 m/s^2: it's not just a good idea, it's the law! :)

    10 to 1 we never see a follow-up, and never know.

  62. Conflict with the BBC story by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

    I was listening to NPR this morning, and they interviewed the girl by phone, and on the phone she said that once they get it authenticated they plan to sell it at a London auction because it's "very valuable".

    The story on the BBC says they intend to put it in a glass case and keep it forever.

    Wonder how it will really turn out...

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  63. Seriously confused here... by cswiii · · Score: 2

    "Sometimes they have shallow depressions and cavities," he said.

    Now, are we talking about the British or the meteorites? ;)

  64. Re:With those odds by uncoveror · · Score: 2

    Unlikely things are happening to her, but that doesn't mean she would win the lottery, after all, the lottery is rigged.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  65. Follow-Up Story by dbretton · · Score: 2

    After exetensive laboratory examination, the meteorite rock was determined to actually be a tooth which had fallen out of her father's mouth.

  66. Re:hmm by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    It's possible this isn't a meteorite. It would have hurt (but probably not much more than having the same rock thrown at you)

    Yeah...A rock thrown at you at terminal velocity!

    Ouch. I saw the headline, and thought "Poor girl. If she lived, it probably went clean through her foot."

    No. You're right about one thing; it's likely not an actual meteorite. Maybe someone threw a rock at her from the safety of behind a house, and missed somewhat?

    --
    It's been a long time.
  67. depends on size by mikeee · · Score: 2

    Drag is proportinal to surface area (size^2) and to velocity squared, and mass is proportinal to volume (size^3). Terminal velocity is the speed where weight equals drag.

    So to a first approximation, terminal velocity is proportinal to sqrt(length). Small objects fall slowly. Quadruple size to double terminal velocity.

    Now, when you start losing size based on some function of speed it gets tricky, but if a meteor melts down to a small rock a few thousand feet up it won't be going fast enough to do much before it hits the ground. The interesting question is how it could get so small when it should have slowed down before then (just momentum??).

  68. Poor kid... by KC7GR · · Score: 2

    She probably made the mistake of trying one of the tricks from this list I wrote up a couple of years back.

    TOP TEN WAYS TO ATTRACT AN ASTEROID

    10). A horseshoe magnet about the size of the moon, hooked up to an equally large Tesla coil.

    9). Find an asteroid slightly smaller than the one you want to attract. Equip it with bikini briefs, a good tan, and a wonder-bra that would turn Playtex green with envy. Place it in geostationary orbit above your desired target zone, and wait.

    8). Lay down a trail of mineral-rich ice crystals from low orbit to the target spot. Hey, asteroids have to eat like anything else...

    7). Locate an asteroid in a bad mood. Call it things like "half-rate pebble" and "quartz queer." Duck behind the far side of the planet, and wait.

    6). Announce a casting call for the next Bruce Willis space movie.

    5). Have at least three Nobel prize-winning scientists announce simultaneously that there's no way any asteroid will ever hit the planet directly. Murphy will do the rest.

    4). We have whistles that only dogs can hear. How hard could asteroid whistles be to do?

    3). Brew a fresh pot of Columbian Lava. Works every time, but don't tell Juan Valdez (or his burro).

    2). Install a 'rock'ing chair at the desired location. Asteroids need a place to rest after dashing all over the solar system.

    And the number one asteroid attractant...

    1). Boost forty-two thousand metric tons of dinosaur remains into orbit. Attach a large sign that says "HA! Missed the first time!"

    (There go my karma points...)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  69. Who'd deserve it? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    this wouldn't be the first time one has been snached up quickly by those who don't deserve. . .

    Who'd deserve it? It's not like anyone did anything to earn it. Maybe a rain-dance gone bad, but I doubt it. ;)

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Who'd deserve it? by Daetrin · · Score: 2
      Maybe a rain-dance gone bad, but I doubt it. ;)

      It must be this guy, and i can see why he's retiring if his rain dances have gotten that far out of whack :)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  70. Re:With those odds by geekoid · · Score: 2

    that is like saying your chances of winning will skyrocket if you would only pick the correct numbers.

    How many meteors hit the earth over a given period?
    what is the surface area of the planet?
    what is the population density?

    now you can come up with some basic numbers of the odds of getting hit by a meteor over a given time.
    and yes, the lottery is easier for determining odds because it is such a limited device.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  71. Whoops! by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    Noticing it was "quite hot", she showed it to her father Niel.

    BZZZT! Nice try. You lose. Thankyou for playing.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  72. 'Huh?' is F*cking-A Right by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    This family's claim is such obvious bullsh*t.

    Repeat after me:

    Meteorites are cold when they hit the ground.
    Meteorites are cold when they hit the ground.
    Meteorites are cold when they hit the ground.
    Meteorites are cold when they hit the ground.
    Meteorites are cold when they hit the ground.

    And the bits about a scientist saying it could be from Mars clearly indicates that the speaker in question is hardly a scientist. I'm being unfair here. More likely, to his credit, it's probably a case of a BBC reporter saying "Do you think it came from Mars?", to which the scientist probably said "Well, it's not very likely, and there's no indication whatsoever that that's the case, but...", to which our reporter adds, "But is IS possible, isn't it? It COULD be from Mars, right?" and so on. Nauseating.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  73. Golf & Lightning by goldspider · · Score: 2
    "More men golf."

    There's an easy way to avoid getting struck (stricken?) by lightning when on a golf course. Just keep a 2-iron in your bag. When a thunderstorm interrupts your game, take out the 2-iron and hold it up high, because it is rumored that not even God himself can hit a 2-iron.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  74. Re:physics? by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    Heretic! This is from the BBC, not some US news outlet. How dare you question it.

  75. Re:With those odds by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The odds *would* be astronomical, except that she already got hit by the meteorite. Now that it's been done, there is a 100% chance of it continuing to have been done, so now all that's left are the odds of her winning the lottery.

  76. Re:With those odds by Daetrin · · Score: 2
    I'm just pointing out that past performance in meteors is no guarantee of future results. So:

    How many meteors hit the earth over a given period?

    is exactly what I'm disputing. Given recent stories like this one [slashdot.org], we clearly can't make many predictions about the chances of a huge influx of small meteors

    This is why it's called probability, not history. Who knows, maybe in the next lottery everyone who buys at least one ticket will get a winning number, and then they'd all get killed by a freak meteor storm. However the odds of either one of those things happening, together or seperatly, is pretty darn low.

    Actually, we _can_ make a lot of predictions about huge influxes of small meteors, we have at least two such events a year that i know of, and they're well documented. All the stealth asteroids that have been speeding by weren't noticed before because we didn't see them and they didn't hit. Meteor showers tend to have this kind of obvious effect however that happens everytime they pass by, becuase some (relatively) small number of them always hit.

    And of course we've got astronomy observations going back for centuries to give us a pretty good idea of what the odds are of a new (and particularly large, if a significant number of people are going to get hit by the remains) meteor shower showing up out of the blue, and they're not very big.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  77. How to get your post +5 funny on Slashdot by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    1. Make up some stupid list.
    2. Add one more item that just says "???"
    3. Add one more item that just says "Profit"
    4. ???
    5. Modded up

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  78. Re:She's 14! by redcliffe · · Score: 2

    Actually, I didn't make that point at all. All I said was that it was in North Yorkshire, and where's Bruce Willis? Chrisd added the rest :-).

  79. Re:Martian invasion? So what? by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    Ah! You have failed to see the insidious nature of their newest invasion! Rocks don't get sick! :)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  80. Re:You're an idiot too. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Quantum mechanics? I thot QM has yet to merge with the relativity stuff. I suppose you are right in that I did not have to bring relatively into the mix. Me bad.

    What the fuck is "excelleration"

    It is when a company tries to do everything with MS-Excel. Happy now?

  81. Re:hmm by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2
    Woah, and look what it did to the car's owner! He looks really messed up. Worse than the car.

    Actually, that guy isn't the car's owner, but rather "meteorite expert" Ray Meyer. Since he is listed as "meteorite expert Ray Meyer" instead of "Ray Meyer, Ph.D., astro-geologist" I suspect that he is just some moron who likes space rocks.

  82. Re:With those odds by uncoveror · · Score: 2

    Here is my response to my illiterate anonymous coward critic.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  83. Re:BULLSH*T!! by uncoveror · · Score: 2

    Thank you for your critique of the lottery article, and here is my response Have a nice day! :)

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  84. The Story Is A Lie and Here's Why by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

    The girl claimed the rock was hot when she picked it up. This is what a Spielberg-fed child would think a fresh-fallen meteorite would feel like, but she's wrong, end of story. As soon as a meteorite hits the ground it's cold, regardless of how fiery it's display may have been on the way down.

    Look up 'ablation' in your favourite astronomical text.

    Numb-nuts.

    --
    **>>BELCH
  85. Re:With those odds by Daetrin · · Score: 2
    There are so many levels of error in that.

    First the weather, sure they can't predict the weather perfectly, which is why you'll notice that they often provide a probability. They're not perfect, but they're right more often than they're wrong, and they know the have a certain margin of error. Although you may not remember it the times when it was indeed 75-80 degrees and partly cloudy far outnumber the times when there was a freak snowstorm instead.

    Secondly, a lot of probabilities are not calculated by exhaustive modeling of the situation, they're calculated by examining past examples. If they're going to make a long term prediction about the weather, say the number of days it will rain in the next year or the average temperature over that time, they don't pull out a weather model and run it ahead 12 months. They pull out the records for the past few decades, check those, and figure out an average. Sure, the sun can could go nova due to some astronomical phenomena that we don't understand yet and their prediction will be off by a few million degrees, but the _probability_ is that next year will be mostly the same as the previous years once all known factors are taken into account (El Nino and such)

    Predicting the chances of getting hit by a meteor is the same thing. They've got fairly detailed records going back decades, and more general records going back centuries. Using those we can make fairly accurate predictions about what the number of meteors expected next year.

    True, an unexpected group of meteors could show up out of nowhere and kill hundreds of people, but there have been no records of anything like that happening in the last thousand years to the best of my knowledge, so the odds of it happening next year without anything else to indicate it's likelyhood is less than one in one thousand.

    If we had the kind of exact model you're talking about it would be a certainty, not a probability. The probability is used because it's what we expect based on past events, and most of the time it's right. When insurance companies calculate the odds of carious acidents and disasters do you think they have some giant country or world wide really detailed version of the Sims running? (If so, why don't they warn the people who are going to have their house burn down ahead of time!) They don't do any kind of physics modeling at all, they just look at historical records, and calculate the odds, and they're usually pretty close, it's how they stay in buisness.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  86. Re:With those odds by Daetrin · · Score: 2
    Not to belabor this discussion but you are wrong about how weather and meteorology works. Historical records are pretty much useless for day to day weather prediction and provide ambiguous data at best about the future.

    You are clearly misreading what i said, because that's mostly what i claimed, although you're wrong about the long term predictions. If we had models that could predict the effects of atmospheric composition to the same detail that you are claiming that we would need to model meteor activity within the solar system then there wouldn't be any controversy about global warming, we could just let the model run and we'd know the answer. You're claiming that such an accurate model is impossible, and i'm agreeing, and claiming that that's not what is used to calculate meteorite frequencies.

    One of the primary reasons there is controversay over global warming is because of the human input into the equation. According to the statistics bassed off of historical records we're heading into an ice age if anything, however we have no long term historical records of a society pumping massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere which would allow us to accuratly predict the effects. We do however have long term historical records of meteor impacts, and no one has any rason to suspect that the human race is currently doing anything to change the rate of impacts, so those records remain statistically valid.

    And yes, models do play a big role in short term forcasting, you're basically supporting my point. Models are for short term forcasts, historic records are used for long term forcasts. No one runs a model to predict that it will get colder in the winter, we know that from milenia of historical records. We can even tell on average how cold it will probably get. We may be wrong for this winter or the next, but averaged over the next ten years we'll be pretty close. We can't predict if a meteor will hit somewhere tomorrow, but we can predict with fair accuracy how many meteors will hit in the coming year, and with even more accuracy how many will hit in the next decade, etc.

    If insurance companies use models, it is only in very limited circumstances. For the most part they use known rates of accident occurance statistically calculated from historic records. They know that about x% of houses will burn down because about x% did last year. That number changes slightly from year to year as technology and conditions changes, but they continuously update their statistics to stay current. They don't really make assumptions about anything, they just go by statistics. They don't expect everyone to go nuts and start lighting houses on fire because statistically only a small number of people do that every year. Sure, there's a small probability that everyone in the world will go nuts next year and every building on the planet will go up in flames, probably about the same probability that a giant meteor storm like you were talking about will hit us.

    NASA _has_ calculated the probability of certain asteroids hitting us, hence the big fuss a month or two ago when they found one that was slightly more likely than a "random" asteroid to hit us. How do they know how likely a "random" asteroid is to hit us? Statistics.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank