Slashdot Mirror


Worldwide WarDrive Aftermath

wardriver writes "The event took place on August 31st 2002, people from around the world took part in the effort to document and make known wireless access points as a group. Some people go WarDriving everyday, so this was just like an normal day for many who attended any of the world wide events as documented on the results page. Hardware ranged from laptops, to car mounted computer systems, to handhelds all equipped with GPS devices to accurately map the spots. Cars were marked with )(WarDriver stickers and people were sporting their wardriving is not a crime t-shirts. All in all the event went well and with enough pressure and requests to chris it may happen again." And in a related story, Dr_Marvin_Monroe writes "Wardrivers be warned---- A Practical Approach to Identifying and Tracking Unauthorized 802.11 Cards and Access Points includes information on locating rogue access points and intruders."

75 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Cisco by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Informative

    It should be known that there are cards that can "just listen" without letting themselves be known.

    Cisco makes the AIR-LMC350 which would be a good choice for wardrivers.

    Or, not being an idiot administrator and leaving everything open helps too ;)

  2. low tech variant of this event... by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I went for a low-tech version of this event.
    Knock knock
    "Anybody home?"
    Try door.
    "This one's locked, next house!"

    Nicky nicky nine doors is fun...except for the old codger sitting on his front porch on a rocker with a shotgun full of rock salt...

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:low tech variant of this event... by dattaway · · Score: 2

      Bleah...

      You aren't sending any packets out to knock. You are simply driving down the street looking for ssids, or house numbers. Looking for packets is like seeing if houses exist in the city.

      Sending ping packets would be knocking on the doors. But you are just passively driving down the street looking at the countryside for life.

  3. Typically North American attitude by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    World Series (2 teams from Canada, rest from States).

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.

    1. Re:Typically North American attitude by swb · · Score: 2

      World Series (2 teams from Canada, rest from States).

      I'd imagine that non-Americans probably don't have this attitude towards the "world champions" in sports that they dominate, like cricket or something that's not played here.

      I think when it comes to baseball it'd be hard to see that the team that wins the World Series isn't the best team in the world.

      The same is true in basketball as has been amply demonstrated in the Olympics since the inclusion of professional players -- the US easily trounces the competition, despite the presence of a handfull of professional players on other national teams.

      I'd like to see more international play in baseball, maybe a world-cup style competition where US World Series champions took on Japanese, Philipine and Central/South American and Carribean teams. I think the results would be pretty dominated by the Americans.

    2. Re:Typically North American attitude by jc42 · · Score: 2

      Um, wasn't this announced on the Internet? Isn't the Internet world-wide?

      So how is it the fault of the organizers (to use the term somewhat loosely) if people in other parts of the world ignored the event or decided not to take part?

      Of course, in parts of the world, people don't have pickup trucks loaded with electronics. But where were the folks in Europe, Japan and Australia?

      Maybe next time, it just needs a bit more publicity, and we can get an idea of how wireless is coming along in the rest of the world.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Typically North American attitude by swb · · Score: 2

      Except the US World Series champion will almost always have a couple Central/South American players, and might have a Japanese pitcher in their bullpen. Those guys would probably want to play representing their own countries, which would mean breaking the US team up, and juggling the rosters of every other team to shoe-horn their expatriot superstars back into the line-up. It would be a mess.

      It would mean some juggling, but they manage to do it in World Cup soccer without too many problems. Maybe it would mean dropping players or making a "USA" team comprised of the best American baseball players, but it would still be worthwhile.

      Don't many Japanese teams have a bunch of US players who weren't good enough for the US major leagues? I seem to recall 60 Minutes episode or something where they followed one American who's huge in Japan but relatively unknown in the US.

  4. NPR story by micromoog · · Score: 3, Funny
    NPR had a story on wardriving this morning. While they didn't use the term, they covered the topic pretty accurately (as usual).

    They interviewed a couple of guys that regularly drive around in a "pickup truck full of gear" and document access points. Apparently one of them has documented more than 400.

    The best part was when they said they do it at night, so people in "affluent neighborhoods" won't mistake the cylidrical antenna for a shotgun.

  5. worldwide wardrive by Golias · · Score: 4, Funny

    If by "worldwide" they mean "a few counties in California, Canada, and bits of the midwest," then the project was an amazing success. :)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  6. Not just for bored amateurs... by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ... wardriving is a fun hobby for real security professionals with big name consulting firms. Its a great way to demonstrate the importance of good practices and how pervasive bad security is. Its a pretty quick way to justify the expense for security, otherwise it can be pretty hard to quantify the benefits of vigilance to the penny counters.

    An ounce of prevention shows up in the ledgers, but they never see the cost of the avoided pound of cure.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  7. "wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "wardriving is not a crime t-shirts...


    You got to admit that people aren't doing themselves any favours by choosing a real positive expression like "wardriving"....


    I can see this must win real friends when you are explaining to companies what you are doing outside their offices. Especially in countries where vigilante groups /gangsters like cruising round in their autos. Great PR, guys :-)


    (Yeah yeah I know the origin of the term but I still think it sucks.. maybe try cruising round New York on 11th September and explain to a cop that you're war driving...)

    1. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by mmoncur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they should call it 'theft of service'.

      Or the T-shirt could be more clear: "Wardriving is not a crime. Or a war."

      --

      It's Slashdot's evil twin... SlashNOT
    2. Re:"wardriving is not a crime" hmmm by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      course, i dont know why they called it wardialing...

      The term wardialing came about because the practice was popularized by the movie WarGames.

  8. Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While white hat hacking can be argued to be ethical (like Adrian Lamo type people), I don't see how wardriving does _not_ lead to unethical practices. It may be interesting how many people have open networks, but really what "good" does war driving accomplish? Do war drivers stop at the house and tell the people "Hey, you're network is open, and this is how you fix it"? What "good" comes out of knowing where wireless service is available?

    I understand that some people invite others onto their network. This is very generous (but in my opinion insane because YOU are responsible for what comes out of YOUR router), but shouldn't these people advertise that their network is open instead of people driving around trying to discover these access points? I think the concept of wardriving is interesting, but the practical ethical results of wardriving efforts seem very very few. Maybe there is some application I am missing. Feel free to enlighten me

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      Why is birdwatching interesting?

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    2. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by Golias · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wi-Fi piggy-backing is kind of analogous to riding freight trains.

      A rail line needs to protect themselves against being held responsible for the hobo population, so they hire screws to kick the bums off the trains. Likewise, most people are advised to encrypt their Wi-Fi signal for the same reason. However, beyond that, most people don't view either type of trespass as a particularly serious crime. Odds are, the user of this WarDrive data is just some warez kid who is using your broadband to swap DivX files or something. Someday they will turn 18, and the fear of a permanent criminal record will disuade them from continuing. (At least that's what happened with all the hacker kids I grew up with.)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      Of course they are. You think the feds aren't going to be like "Hey, Microsoft, that hacker came from msn. If you don't help us find him, you're fuct." Then MS is of course going to respond with "Sure Mr. Feds. The person who did it is John Smith at ...". What do you think they are going to do? Protect their users?? Please. Only when it gets to your end of the chain, what are you going to say "Uhhh... it was some wireless guy passing by. Sorry, I can't help you"? That will go over well.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    4. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by rworne · · Score: 2
      Funny, since I "wardrove" for about a month picking up experimental data for a report I presented in a grad school class about the lack of WiFi security.

      I followed basic precautions:
      Never entered private property
      Configured the notebook to not route any packets
      Placed the contraption in the back seat so it wasn't a driving distraction
      Performed no "follow-up" actions such as attempting to connect to unsecured networks

      I came up with interesting data too, the overall percentage of encrypted AP's was 28%, that is a mix of residential, schools and businesses.

      For grins, I chose a more localized area with just Fortune 500 companies, high-rises and strictly commercial areas and got a rate of... 28%. Scary. It makes me curious to see how many of these are behind the company firewalls, but I actually know better than to try and find that out.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    5. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by psxndc · · Score: 2
      I'm not missing the point though. If "joe bob nice guy" wants to set up a wireless AP for people to use out of the kindness of his heart, great. What a swell person. However, if this is what he is offering, he should post a sign outside of his house saying "Free wireless access" or put an ad in the paper.

      On the other hand, wardriving to me is "let's see who's wireless network is open" regardless if it's "joe bob nice guy" or "joe dude I just use what Linksys gave me". Wardriving is not about sharing a connection, it's about "let me see who leaves their door unlocked in the neighboorhood". While not illegal, what are the legal, ethical benefits? I don't see any. It's not that it should be illegal, and more people should be aware of what they are setting up, but there is no benefit other than academic to going around and seeing who's door is unlocked.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    6. Re:Somebody please clear this up for me... by tcr · · Score: 2

      I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle....

      If SSID's are being broadcast, I don't think it's wrong to wander past and list them.

      If someone tries to connect to a private network without permission, or examine traffic, I think a line has been crossed.

      Unauthorised access to systems carries criminal charges here in the UK, IIRC.

      I think the manufacturers bear a much of the blame here, as they should supply a simple security checklist so that the non-techie users can understand the issues, and secure their gear as part of the installation process.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  9. That's funny by Night+Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Wardriving is not a crime..."


    Unless you think of THEFT OF SERVICE!

    Sometimes I have to wonder about the real-world intelligence of these people. Sure, they probably are really bright when it comes to technology, but evolution should have taken care of the guys wearing these t-shirts long ago.

  10. Don't they have anything better to do? by JimPooley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some people go WarDriving everyday...

    ...and really need to get a life.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
    1. Re:Don't they have anything better to do? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      "I have documented over 7000 APs in the last two months"
      Whoop-de-doo! I'm sure trainspotters boast to each other about how many train numbers they have in their little notebooks, but they're still strange sad bastards.

      You could actually do something that doesn't involve computers. Heresy on Slashdot, I know, but there are more things in life than computing. You could take in the scenery, for a start. Stop and smell the roses.

      By the way, if you're doing your own driving, you really ought to be concentrating on the road rather than how many networks you can find.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  11. Wardriving Results by drewzhrodague · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also, people have been uploading their scans to http://mapserver.zhrodague.net -- a web-based mapping package for the entire planet, and http://www.wigle.net - a java-based mapping client. Check 'em out when you get a chance.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  12. Re:So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by radish · · Score: 2

    'world' events in Europe and Asia are similarly limited ...

    Got any examples? And don't say the World Cup, it has hundreds of countries including the USA.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  13. How about... by setzman · · Score: 2, Funny

    /.'ing a server so quickly should be a crime.

    --
    C:\>
  14. Useless ? by CresentCityRon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem to me that if someone wanted you on their system they would register on one of the various websites for free wireless access.

    If they didn't want you then you're becoming a bother. I guess you could tell them that they were open and be helpful. I don't see anything of that angle though.

    So its just "Lets see who screwed up their technology. Tee Hee." Nothing useful here.

  15. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by SynKKnyS · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was named after "War Dialing." http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_dialing

  16. Not a crime by Strog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Port scanning also is not a crime(for now at least) but a lot of crimes are started with it. I don't blame people for getting a little paranoid.

    It's like a guy swinging a baseball bat all over the place. Sure it's not illegal but he could start clobbering people whether on purpose or not. I'd probably tell him to stop swinging too.

    My brother-in-law lives in California and has had all kinds of trouble since this event. Conicidence?? You start stealing service and disrupting other people's service and you just crossed the line.

    The people that are just scanning and mapping could be considered accesories to the crime when other people use their info to "steal bandwidth".

    1. Re:Not a crime by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      Yes it is, well under UK law.
      It's spelled out in fact :

      Gaining or attempting to gain anauthorised access to a computer.

      Like all good laws no methodology is mentioned or proscribed. In this way the burden of proof is on the prosecution and the interpretation of the law is for the courts.

      Incidentally I had a friend who was a phreaker. He was arrested for it before the Computer Misuse Act was put on the statute. The cops had a print out of phone company logs for all the phone calls he'd made through them. He had to sit there while they asked him if he'd made *every* individual call. It took them 10 hours.

      In the end all he was prosecuted for was "theft of electricity" and walked with a £70 fine.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Not a crime by DrSkwid · · Score: 2
      It's like a guy swinging a baseball bat all over the place.

      Any UK officer could pick one of (but not limited to) :
      • Threatening behaviour.
      • Posession of an offensive weapon.
      • Breach of the Peace.
      • Behaviour likely to occasion a breach of the peace.
      • Behaviour contrary to section 5 of the public order act (1986 i think).


      I found a url for the other comment

      Which, I think (IANAL) lays out in pretty straight terms that wardriving and portscanning is illegal in the UK.

      Computer Misuse Act 1990

      1. (1) A person is guilty of an offence if--

      (a) he causes a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access to any program or data held in any computer;

      (b) the access he intends to secure is unauthorised; and

      (c) he knows at the time when he causes the computer to perform the function that that is the case.

      (2) The intent a person has to have to commit an offence under this section need not be directed at--

      (a) any particular program or data;

      (b) a program or data of any particular kind; or

      (c) a program or data held in any particular computer.

      (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale or to both.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  17. They need to advertise on /. by anticypher · · Score: 2

    If they were smart, they would get their site posted to slashdot after first making sure their 56k modem was up to withstanding a slashdot effect.

    Oh, wait. Nevermind.

    The many war{driving|storming|floating|biking|hiking} groups here in Europe would likely participate next time.

    I just got a new laptop and I'll be getting netstumbler up and running RSN. Part two of my driving around Europe vacation is about to begin. That should provide a nice map of a few dozen cities by the end of the month.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  18. Re:So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Got any examples? And don't say the World Cup, it has hundreds of countries including the USA.

    You are absolutely correct about the World Cup. Indeed, that is why soccer (football) is the one sport I enjoy watching. Football (soccer) is one of the few areas that is truly worldwide, with Africa as well represented as, say, Asia or Europe.

    I'm trying to recall some of the 'world' events I saw while I was living in Germany (mostly art and music events) that represented perhaps 10 countries, out of how many hundred? In any event, a tiny slice of the world, even if the 10 countries in question were widely scattered. If you look around, I'm sure you'll see what I mean.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  19. Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most cards have Linux drivers that allow them to be put into "RF Monitor" mode, which is completely passive. This is the default mode of operation for Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/)

    Supported cards include:
    Prism2 with the linux-wlan-ng drivers
    Orinoco cards with a slightly patched driver from http://airsnort.shmoo.net/
    SOME Cisco cards. While they all happily go into RF Monitor mode when asked, SOME OF THEM KEEP BROADCASTING.

    So all in all, if you *absolutely* don't want to be detected, Cisco is the least safe choice for wardriving. Orinoco is probably the best bet, even though you will have to downgrade your Orinoco firmware for compatibility (8.10 is severely broken for RFMon usage). Prism2s have the best compatibility, but are generally known for crappy receivers and most don't allow external antennas. Almost all Orinoco-based cards have much better receivers and support external antennas. The Cisco hardware is the best (100 mW transmit, not like that matters if you're trying to stay silent, some have dual MMCX jacks for diversity antennas), but you can't trust it to stay silent in RF Monitor mode.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Ciscos can't be trusted to stay silent. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Agree. The Ciscos are VERY nice, as long as you're careful to get one that doesn't decide to peep anyway in RFMon mode.

      Dunno how Orinocos compare to the Ciscos sensitivity-wise. They're definately much better than Prisms (We have 3 Prism2-based cards in my house and one Orinoco, the Orinoco gets much better range.)

      100 mW transmit isn't much of an advantage for wardriving. Is very nice otherwise though. :)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  20. Re:Why "WarDriving"? by autocracy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comes from War Dialing - dialing every phone number in a block in an attempt to find modems. This was typically done in order to find a weak point in an organization. War Driving is a similar art.

    --
    SIG: HUP
  21. Re:War...Driving by Wiseazz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Legal or not, there is certainly an ethical question here... not so with skateboarding. Don't sniff around other folks' networks, regardless of your intentions. No good will come of it.

    --
    My sig sucks.
  22. don't know about warDriving, but warchalking was.. by perky · · Score: 2
    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  23. Simple. Curiosity. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    In many cases, these people go wardriving just out of curiosity.

    I find it very interesting that in a short drive around my area I found 45 networks (I was NOT expecting that many, esp. since I wasn't using an external antenna), and over a third of them were factory default. (Not just unencrypted, but completely unchanged factory default units.)

    I haven't actually DONE anything with those APs though.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  24. War Driving != Network intrusion by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Note that Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/ is purely passive - You NEVER associate with the AP or broadcast it to any way.

    So how is that intrusion?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:War Driving != Network intrusion by mwjlewis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So

      Wireless
      Access
      Recon
      DRIVING
      does NOT? Mean anything. Man, And to think that I thought of that on my own, cause it was all that made sence.

      --
      www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
  25. Amen. Wardriving != using the APs by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    As I mentioned in a previous post - Many people just do it out of curiosity to see what's out there. They never DO anything with the information except for plot it, and in mant cases, laugh at the morons who leave their APs wide-open factory-default.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  26. Idiot Administrators by hillct · · Score: 2

    It boggles the mind that so many administrators unintentionally leave their wireless networks open and available to anyone willing to make a little effort (and some cases, no effort at all). Certainly, wardrivers who spend time attempting to access secured networks need to consider their actions carefully, but what constitutes a secured network? There are plenty of foolish administrators out there who take no measures at all to secure their networks but of those who do, and have their networks authorized by 'unauthorized' persons; what truly constitutes security? Certainly there is a level of incompetence in network security where the person gaining unauthorised access can simply claim(when acused of accessing a secured network illegally) "The network was not secured". There has to be some remedial security standard below which (assumin it would otherwise be a crime to access a particular secured network) no crime would have been committed.

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:Idiot Administrators by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 5, Insightful

      hillct wrote:

      > It boggles the mind that so many administrators
      > unintentionally leave their wireless networks open
      > and available

      It doesn't boggle anything when you get off you geeky high horse and realize that most people buying and installing wireless network equipment are not "administrators" of any sort. They are ordinary people who don't know a thing about network security, but just need a net to work. The only thing that boggles the mind is that you would rationalize preying upon their ignorance.

      The manufacturers hold one key to solving this. If they would make the configuration of these networks secure by default, and give people easy to understand instructions for enabling security: "Yes, I want to make my network safe from invading hordes of young hoodlums.", it would help.

      "Godzilla and Jaguar: Punch! Punch! Punch! Hit! Hit! Hit!
      We die if they stop fighting for us."
      Jet Jaguar Song, "Godzilla vs. Megalon"

    2. Re:Idiot Administrators by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I take offense at this. I am one of those "idiot administrators" of whom you speak--I run an unsecured wireless access point (two, actually). I do so by choice--my home network is for my use, and that of my guests; setting up individual permissions for every guest is a pain. Additionally, I'm happy to share the bandwidth with my neighbors. I keep an eye on my logs, and so far (1.5 years), I've not seen anything that concerns me. My other network is also open to the public. I follow the same security procedures as the wired network to which it connects: if you can plug in, you can get access. With the abundance of public ports, and unsupervised ports, my wireless hub does not affect security in any way. It does, however, add convenience. If you're ever in the pilot lounge at Westheimer Airport (Norman, OK), and notice you have 802.11b connectivity, stop by my office and say hi--that's my hub you're using, and I hope you enjoy it. Idiot sysadmin? No, try generous--there are no security concerns for me, so I share, try to do everybody a favor. I'll shut down the open access when it becomes a problem; until then, enjoy the bandwidth.

      --
      Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
  27. Re:getting into things that are not your concern by dattaway · · Score: 2

    Wardriving as peeking in someone's window is only if you are running a program to capture packets at the same time. You can run ethereal and airsnort at the same time to view the webpages people see. That would be snooping.

    Looking at ssid's like like looking at housenumbers as you drive down the street. Wardriving is like seeing if there are houses in the city. Its like looking at the development of the neighborhoods. Do these people plan properly?

  28. Re:getting into things that are not your concern by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    birdwatching is about understanding what is out there and to a degree the world around you.


    When I scan for networks, I am doing just that. I can see in real time how my neighborhoods are evolving - where the technical people are, where businesses are popping up, even cafes. There's a cafe near my office whose access point is named 'Good Day Cafe'. They apparently leave it open on purpose. I first saw it from a taxi in Omotesando. For them, it's a form of cheap advertising I guess.

    Lots of people (myself included) leave their access open for web browsing.

    Often times, my iBook will automatically log me on to the strongest network I am near. I've noticed that I sometimes get a low IP like 192.168.0.2, which would seem to indicate that it's just me and the router - no servers to 'snoop'. Most home users seem to just use these things to get online.

    Be ashamed for not knowing the difference!

    Don't be such a pill.

    There's a big difference between logging networks and breaking into them. At least awareness is being raised and more people that want to are securing their nets.

    Cheers,
    Jim

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  29. Re:Not really. by ericman31 · · Score: 2

    Sorry, you can't justify your crime because they did something wrong. If you use someone's wireless network, whether they secured it or not, without their permission, it is illegal. Whether their signal is interfering with your phone or not. If their wireless equipment is FCC certified and they have it set to factory defaults they aren't doing anything wrong. If that causes interference on your wireless phone, you need to complain to the FCC and the manufacturer, not try to justify illegally using your neighbor's network.

    --
    In my universe I'm perfectly normal, it's not my fault you don't live in my universe.
  30. Time for a little honesty by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, Slashdotters. Time to fess up and be honest Wardriving, though harmless in and of itself, is shady business. It's the electronic equivalent of casing a store or residence in order to rob it later. I realize the vast majority of wardrivers do nothing with the info they find, and right now it's more of a fad than anything (especially for kids that fantasize about being Mad Haxorz with Big Skillz, or whatever they hell they're calling it this week), but deep down, face it. You KNOW you're up to no good. The very essence of Wardriving is LOOKING FOR VULNERABILITIES. Only two kinds of people really give a damn about this kind of information. Serious security researchers, and net scum looking to break into networks. Now, like everyone else, I'm getting damn tired of seeing my liberties slip away in new laws and regulations. But if there was half an ounce of honesty here, we'd all admit to each other that by doing stupid shit like Wardriving, we're begging the government and public to be alarmed and put further restrictions on what we do. So to you people that deface webpages, spread virii, and wardrive looking networks to break into, why don't you do us a favor and go fuck yourselves. You are why the word "hacker" evokes fear and loathing.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  31. who f-ing cares?!? by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Why have an event ... indeed! What is the goal here? Awareness? Big deal! In the grand scheme of things, are unsecure wireless networks going to mean anything real to humankind? Is this Wardriving 'event' going to draw attention to a subject that will make someone think twice about something that might save the lives of themselves and/or others?

    To put this in perspective, consider that for years cellphones were 100% open to eavesdropping. In one case this vulnerability was exploited to expose a scandalous affair Prince Charles was having. Did people take notice and say, "Damn. I better get some encryption going on!" No.

    Even if every wireless AP owner knew people might be accessing their networks surrepititiously, would they really care enough to do something about it? Probably not.
  32. So Get off your butt and do some wardriving by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    WarDriving... Cities from only the western part of North America...

    Don't call it "World" if its just North America, and especially don't if its just a region of North America.


    So get off your butt and go do some wardriving. Nothing is stopping you, or anyone else in the world, from participating. Indeed, I suspect the organizers would be happier if more countries participated.

    Perhaps it will become an annual event, with gradually more countries taking part.

    BTW - Where do you draw the line for 'world?' 1 country per continent, x countries per hemisphere? Most 'world' events in Europe and Asia are similarly limited ... only a tiny fraction of the world community takes part (e.g. "world" art exhibitions, with all of 4 countries on 4 continents represented out of hundreds is arguably as small a slice of the world as it would be if those 4 countries were on one continent, to cite an example I witnessed more than once while living in Germany).

    If 10 people take part in a 'world' event and they happen to be scattered all over the globe, does that somehow add legitimacy over 10,000 people taking part, who happen to be scatterd over just one corner of it? I agree the term is often abused, but your kneejerk reaction is more than a little silly itself.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  33. Re:why have an event by bons · · Score: 2

    Probably not. No one ever takes the black helicopters seriously. Why would they take wardrivers seriously?

  34. Link to Story by cpfeifer · · Score: 2

    When the story goes live on the website, here's the link

    --
    it's not going to stop until you wise up, no it's not going to stop. so just give up.
  35. There seems to be a disjoint. by bons · · Score: 2

    If I can see you having sex as I ride by in a car is that my fault or yours?
    If I can see you having sex as I ride by in a car provided I'm using glasses is that my fault or yours?
    How about if I use a pair of binoculars?
    How about a telescope?

    Why wardriving are listening to telephones with a ham radio are probably both socially repugnant the flip side is that one group of people are BROADCASTING on public airwaves. If they don't want people listening to those broadcasts, maybe they shouldn't be broadcasting on a public frequency.

    If you want privacy, pull the digital shades.

    1. Re:There seems to be a disjoint. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      yes, but you are entering into there computer system, which is not public, unlesss explicitly dedicated for public use.
      Inevitable this will require you to access there Hard lines, which is NOT public.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. is there a list of MAC addresses used by APs? by carlhirsch · · Score: 2

    I'm hoping to write some scripts of my own to scan the various MAC addresses that show up on the network I manage for 802.11 access points.

    So far I haven't been able to find a list of the prefixes used by various manufacturers for their access points. I asked about this on usenet but the only replies I got were the IEEE lists of ALL MAC address prefixes, with no distinction between NICs, APs, switches, etc.

    I'm sure various vendors must have compiled such a thing for their auditing tools... but it doesn't seem like there's anything available through Google just yet.

    Thanks for any help you can give!

    -carl

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
  37. so how do I keep secure? by happyclam · · Score: 2

    I have read a lot of snickering about idiotic network managers and know-nothing, affluent homeowners. I guess I fall into the latter category. It would be really nice if one--just one--person posting criticism might also offer a link or word of advice on how to actually secure my spiffy new wireless access point.

    My router offers WEP, but a quick Google search makes me wonder if even that's enough. What can the know-nothing, affluent homeowner do that does not take six weeks of intensive reading on network security?

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    1. Re:so how do I keep secure? by zoward · · Score: 2

      Most routers (including my Netgear wireless) allow you to restrict wireless acess by the MAC address of the connecting wireless card. Just restrict your router to the MAC addresses of the wirelss cards in your laptop(s) and/or wireless desktop(s) and you should be all set.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    2. Re:so how do I keep secure? by Junta · · Score: 2

      From a practical perspective, as a non-sysadmin about the best you can easily do is WEP. Though weak, it is better than nothing and is certainly sufficient to keep all but the most determined attackers at bay.

      When having to settle for WEP, you should regularly change keys. Since this is a home situation, manually changing it every couple of days or so should suffice. In a corporate enviornment, some sort of automatic rekeying should be implemented to complement WEP. If you do not rekey, and you have a persistant attacker sniffing your packets constantly, your traffic could be compromised in less than a week (I've managed overnight in my tests when constantly saturating the wireless bandwidth with data). Some equipment is better about the weak points of WEP than others, but assume you have the weakest and change every day or two. Chances are slim that a house would have a person trying hard to crack when so many open APs can be found.

      Personally, I back up my wireless configuration with IPSec in addition to WEP. With WEP alone, all they can do is get a dhcp response, talk to other wireless systems, and hit the router on udp port 500 and esp (for ipsec). Once in IPSec, they get access to the wired network and the outside world. Still not the perfect solution (plan to force traffic through routing table when I get around it), but still serves to protect some of the more important stuff pretty reliably.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:so how do I keep secure? by tcr · · Score: 2

      Here you go.

      I've been asking the same kind of thing on Usenet...

      I gather that setting allowable MAC addresses adds a little bit of security, but sadly, the "authorised" wireless clients broadcast them as identification to the access point. So they're ultimately detectable and spoofable...

      Dunno which Linksys you have, but some very helpful guys have responded to me with good suggestions for the Linksys BEFW11S4 v2 (1.42.7 firmware), which are :

      Change the default admin password for your router

      Change the default SSID from 'Linksys'

      Don't broadcast the SSID (set "Allow "Broadcast" SSID to associate?" to No)

      Change the default broadcast channel

      Follow the link above, and set allowable MAC addresses to be your machines

      If you use DHCP, limit the max number of DHCP leases to be the number of machines you have

      Also, change the default DHCP starting address - 192.168.1.100/101/102 are guessable

      Similarly, change the default IP address of your router

      Enable WEP (this might decrease performance, tho')

      As the chap (who kindly advised me) said, none of these measures guarantees security. Even all of them in combination... But you make it more likely that the potential intruder will get fed up and move on to a different target.

      (With thanks to Dane)

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  38. Re:War...Driving by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    g0bshiTe wrote:

    > Last I heard it was not a crime to putt around
    > anyones neighborhood, whether you lived there or
    > not. So what, if you just happen to have a laptop
    > and a wireless network device. I haven`t heard of
    > anyone bieng arrested for posessing network gear.
    > Unless it was stolen! Is a cop really gonna bust
    > you for wardriving? I think not.

    If you "putt around" the neighborhood of a single woman, living alone, especially at night, she will most likely be giving her local police department a call about a "suspicious vehicle" which appears to be canvasing the neighborhood. And when you explain to Mr. Policeman that you are "scanning for access points", you are going to be seeing some bars from the inside very shortly.

    And if Mr. Policeman sees your WarDriving Tshirt, no doubt he will think you are part of a gang.

    > It`ll be the old skateboarding thing, where your
    > told that even though it is public property, and
    > you technically can be there that what your
    > doing is potentially damaging and/or disruptive.
    > Who cares!

    My guess is the rest of the general public who don't want to be damaged or disrupted. Well, except for the bigger skateboarding dude that runs into you and puts you in the hospital. Chances are, he won't care.

    To be a responsible member of a civilized society, you have to think (and care) about the impact of your actions on others.

    "What do you think Mothra would do?" - Moll, "Mosura" 1996

  39. Wardriving anti-FUD by PureFiction · · Score: 2

    I am seeing a lot of confused comments in this thread, so I will throw in my $0.02.

    Disclosure: I wardrive on occasion. I keep a list of access points that I find while driving. Currently in excess of 1,000 for the Portland, OR area.

    1. Why wardriving? Everyone has their reasons. Mine are security related. Myself and a small group of other local wifi enthusiasts enjoy passive monitoring to identify security weaknesses. We also inform insecure node operators of the fact that their networks are wide open.

    We have found a number of extremely sensitive, wide open access points operated by city and state governments, corporations, and home users. By this I mean networks that are obviously not intended to be public.

    If your government has weak security on sensitive information, this can affect you directly (which means Us, the wardrivers too). So we like to notify them of the vulnerabilities and give them information on fixing the holes. Sometimes we get paid to do this.

    [You will notice the results page is missing GPS coordinates. This is intentional, as there are those out there who would take advantage of unsecured networks]

    This is also usefull for identifying trends and generating usefull statistics.

    2. How do you really secure a wireless network? You have a few options: Basic security and high security.

    Basic Security: Enable MAC ID restrictions, allowing only those cards with a specific MAC id to connect to the network. Also turn on 128bit WEP encryption. You can switch to a lesser used channel, like 1 or 11 if you wish.

    Please note that this is still easily circumvented with the right tools, like AirSnort and MAC ID spoofing. Despite this, most people will find a network in this state and move on. It significantly raises the barrier to entry.

    High Security: Install a VPN with very good passwords or preferably something like SecureID cryptographic tokens. This is the only way to be truly secure, where truly secure is as good as the firewall VPN combo you use at work.

  40. Re:How is it intruding if it's left wide open? by afxgrin · · Score: 2

    No one said anything about browsing the network. They're just looking for networks ... that's all. :-)

  41. Well i like to call it by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    pollution/

    Why think of you feet when you can think in your head.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  42. Re:why open WAP's are good by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 2
    I don't do anything bad with my access.

    Um, getting the access is the bad thing. Criminal tresspass and all that.

    --

    - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

  43. Just FYI... Re:NPR story by don_bailey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note that the 400 access points we discovered were just during THAT evening's war-drive.

    I war-drive for one reason--to guage the growth of wi-fi in the Northern Virginia area. It's been fascinating. Driving last year I'd pick up 20-40 access point within a few miles of my home. Now, I pick up several hundred on an hour long cruise around my town. That phenomenon keeps me going out on a monthly basis.

    We visited Old Town Alexandria for this NPR event. We combined it with a "war-walk" and it's a shame they edited out that portion of the adventure. The inebriated queries regarding our yagis were an amusing portion of the un-edited mini-discs.

    If you would like to see the setup that was used, visit:

    http://ruff.cs.jmu.edu/~beetle/wardrive/index.html

    We used this same setup for a similar war-driving demo for the Baltimore Sun a few months back.

    Beetle

    --
    Beetle

    http://ruff.cs.jmu.edu/~beetle/
  44. typical lazy non-north american stupidity by geekoid · · Score: 2

    If you bothered to check, its called the World Series, because it was started by the World newspaper, hence the World series. If it was started by the times, it would be called the Times series.

    Normally I'd say someone was ignorant but since you know about google, clearly you made no effort to confirm your assumption, so your stupid.

    BTW it(wardriving) was a world event, the fact that you didn't participate is hardly the fault on North America.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. War Driver shirts by libertynews · · Score: 2
    I've just discovered this new hobby, using Linux, kismet and gpsdrive. So I put together a t-shirt for War Drivers - www.cafepress.com/wardriver. All profits (every check from cafepress) goes to the eff.


    Brian

    --
    Remember Lexington Green!
    1. Re:War Driver shirts by libertynews · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but those shirts are ugly. And by saying that it isn't a crime you are encouraging the perception that it is a crime by being defensive about it.

      --
      Remember Lexington Green!
  46. Cricket is completely different. by hayden · · Score: 2
    Unlike the baseball "World" Series, Cricket's World Cup can actually claim more than two competeing countries. There are the top teams, England, Australia, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, South Africa, New Zealand and also some newer, not quite so good teams, Kenya, Bandladesh (sp?) Zimbabwe (actual New Zealand probably should be put in the second list :)

    A better example would be Aussie Rules Football except that there has never been a "World" anything and it's called "Aussie" rules.

    And for the poster above, neither Ireland or Scotland have world class cricket teams. Not sure what they play in Scotland but Ireland play a game called Curling I believe. It's sort of an unusual cross between field hockey, soccer, rugby and war.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  47. War is cool! by fantomas · · Score: 2

    Yeah glad you stuck in the emoticon, I think a lot of people do get a buzz out of the 'war' association, kind of macho big dick stuff. Me, I got mugged a week ago, kicked to the ground and kicked in the head multiple times by several teenagers trying to get my bike and wallet. Ouch, not nice. More to the point if this was not nice then the whole idea of war, people trying to shoot me with guns would probably be even less pleasant. So I think I'll skip the war=cool thing... (Sort of happy ending: a woman in a house across the road came out and shouted at the kids from her window, called the police and the kids ran off. I gave chase, well limped, and a biker dood gave me a lift and we caught up with the kids and got my bike back off them. Goes to prove there are good and bad people in the world).

  48. get a life? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Or a job?

    See for many of us it isn't that easy. Look at the unemployment numbers for this month and you'll see why.

  49. Re:Hmm... by tcr · · Score: 2

    If I walk by a house or business (on the sidewalk) and they have a widescreen TV in view, with the windows open, and they are playing a pay-per-view movie, and I watch it, am I a criminal?


    In that scenario, you're not affecting their enjoyment of/use of/benefit-derived-from the service they are paying for.

    If your neighbour is paying for a 512/1Mb/2Mb connection, and you connect to it and start downloading ISO's, then you are limiting their use of a service they're paying for.

    IANAL, but I seem to remember that theft is the act of depriving the rightful owner of the use of/rights to/benefits of their property.

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  50. Re:Have a mac? Want to go wardriving? by tcr · · Score: 2

    Now drive around town. Whenever you encounter an 802.11 access point, the computer will speak to you with the name of the network.

    Cool...

    I must remember to change my SSID to "This is the police. Pull over."

    :-)

    --


    Information wants to be beer.
  51. Re:Amen. Wardriving != using the APs by Night+Goat · · Score: 2

    I've been reading all these replies to my post, and felt that I should clarify. (Maybe it's not a good idea right now, I've been up all night from insomnia) I sort of assumed that people would be eventually using these unsecured access points to get a free internet connection. I imagine there are people out there who just record where the open WAPs are. However, from what I've read in the newspapers, magazines, web, etc., I have noticed that people have been marking these spots like hoboes used to do or maybe still do. Or maybe there's a web site out there that catalogs them all. Now there's no point in doing that besides letting others know where the free access is. That results in eventual theft of service. So while just cataloging the open wireless transmissions isn't theft of service, making these spots widely known seems to me to be a bit unscrupulous, like a locksmith publishing his book of lock backdoors to the Internet. Hopefully you understand what I was getting at.