Slashdot Mirror


Undersea Deposits of Frozen Methane Found

geoswan writes "The CBC is running a story about large deposits of Frozen methane off the coast of Vancouver Island . The deposits may be 850 meters deep. The story doesn't say how the methane came to be a solid. Pressure? The story doesn't address what technology could be used to mine these deposits, if the decision is made to develop these resources. The CBC showed pictures taken of the methane hydrate. Sure enough, it looked like a big snowbank. It is an environmentally sensitive area. So, how about it, should it be exploited?"

17 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. WOO HOO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they found frozen farts, let's rejoice! And then let's post a story about it.

  2. I sense a disturbance in the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as if millions of trolls cried out with bad fart jokes for this topic... ;)

  3. (runs and hides) by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Holy flammable gas Batman, did they just say methane on Slashdot?"
    "Yes they did Robin, you know what that means."
    "Links to goatse! Oh the horror!"
    "Yes, and we haven't much time to lose. To the Batmobile!"

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:(runs and hides) by Draoi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well in that case, here's a link to further information on the practical applications of methane gas.

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  4. We don't use our other methane sources by nesneros · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, we have something like 15 millian cows in the US alone, and we haven't even begun to milk that source yet, why go to the bottom of the ocean for it?

    Other sources include:

    1) Our office after Qdobo's 2 for $2 Thursday night burrito special.
    2) My uncle Floyd.
    3) The United States Congress.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
    1. Re:We don't use our other methane sources by RobinH · · Score: 5, Funny

      we have something like 15 millian cows in the US alone, and we haven't even begun to milk that source yet

      Yep, in Canada we've been studying a method of building a big dome over the U.S. and siphoning off all the methane from cow farts. Such a dome would have other benefits as well. ;^)

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:We don't use our other methane sources by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea like keeping canadians out of our malls in WNY...

      --
  5. Re:PV=nRT? by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you can put opec out of business.

    And create mpec. or even mpec4 :-)

    --
    Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
  6. Good idea by jmu1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, I say it's a great idea. Why manufacture weapons of mass destruction, when we could just have nature do it for us? I say go for it! Kill the world and have it done with.

  7. Bad news... by manon · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is bad news for Canada... Bush is going to want the land now...

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
  8. Re:armageddon by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, do you want them to touch it? :))

    after that ... you bet your arse I want them to touch it, or at least figure out how to release it in a contained way so we dont get a cataclysmic release during the next earthquake in that area. or it builds up to a critical mass that self releases.

    basically it can be captured if you can force a slowish release of the gas you can easily capture it with a collection dome of some type and gas pumps to siphon off the gasses. a high rate release (I mean slow as in only a few thousand cubic meters of gas an hour.. I mean high-rate as in 30-40 million cubic meters of gas per second... IE: the planet farts) would generate more pressure and power than any man made device could handle or contain.. a steel collection dome would rupture instantly.

    Although another way would be to pump tons of Oxygen down there into the "snowbank" and set it all off underwater with explosives... Sure it would create a tsunami that would pale in comparasion to a gigantic metor crashing into the ocean but it would be really cool to watch! and imagine the TV shows about it.... "Survivor XII.... who will survive in these tiny rafts in the vacinity of the methane detonation"

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  9. Re:armageddon by gmkeegan · · Score: 5, Funny

    If vast amounts of methane were released, the highly explosive gas would be ignited by lightning, scorching huge area in a fiery hell-on-earth."

    We'd better start putting corks in the millions of cattle all over the world then.

  10. GM cows: the downside by tlambert · · Score: 5, Funny

    "GM Cows that dont fart so much are being developed right now."

    The downside is that if you let them get more than about four years old, they explode violently.

    -- Terry

  11. Beware the Seamonsters! by airrage · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not frozen methane -- it's a cap on an undersea cave. If you take off the cap it will release the seamonsters! Run for your lives! aaaaaahhhhhh! ahhhhhhhh!

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  12. Re:reminds me of civilization by Bearpaw · · Score: 3, Funny
    and thank goodness that it wasn't a rouge tribe hellbent on killing us.

    Well, dahling, if you put on a little lipstick, they'll probably let you live.

    Um. Or did you mean rogue tribe?

    Never mind.

  13. Trouble on the Horizon by ZombieFrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the kind of news story that always appears at the beginning of a Gozilla movie.

    Save Tokyo!
    Do not disturb the frozen methane!

    --
    Z. http://www.play.net Your games, my job. C'est la vie!
  14. Re:Who owns it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just where would someone find an "environmentally insensitive area"?