Slashdot Mirror


Egyptian Pyramid Mysteries to Be Explored Live

An anonymous reader noted that "National Geographics will probe the inside of a blocked shaft in the Great Pyramid of Giza, and will also open the oldest intact sarcophagus found in moder times." Since this is the shaft where all the secret alien technology has been stored for the last few thousand years, and everyone knows that these "Sarcophagus" things are what the Gou'ald use to regenerate, I think this whole thing will be interesting as hell. Awh who am I kidding- I'm just a junkie on watching those specials where they explore pyramids.

60 of 212 comments (clear)

  1. not 1872! 1993 by Mazzaroth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article sais that a stone hatch with copper handle were discovered in 1872. Wrong!.

    In 1992-3, a team using a small robot with a video camera revealed a strange stone slab, which blocks the 40-degree, 200-foot southern lower shaft. This stone has 2 copper fittings. Rudolf Gantenbrink, the head of the research project narrates: The face of the inspector sitting next to me at the monitor has become chalk white. He draws my attention to two round, white marks on the copper fittings. "These are seals, these are seals!" he exclaims, visibly shaken.. Read this totally fascinating story here. The entire UPUAUT project scientific report page is available here too.

  2. shouldn't they leave this lind of stuff to... by mattbland · · Score: 3, Funny

    SG1 !

    --
    /usr/bin/awake/too/long
    1. Re:shouldn't they leave this lind of stuff to... by packeteer · · Score: 2

      god i hope by kernel 7.0 we are past 802.11b... the best possible current technology i can think of is 802.11a but even then its going to not be enough soon...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. Why so long? by uq1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This shaft has been known for quite some time. Why has it taken so long to finally explore what many believe may be a significant find?

    1. Re:Why so long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why? Simple. Zahi Hawass wants to cash in.

      A bit of history here...Rudolph Gantenbrink and his team discovered the door some years ago. Zahi responded by rushing them out of the country and making sure that they wouldn't be able to come back.

      For years Zahi Hawass has claimed that there is "nothing" to see up the shafts, that there is no "door". Now, he's gone 180 degrees and claims there IS a door. The whole thing is a circus, and Zahi Hawass wants to be ringmaster. He also wants to lay claim to whatever is behind that door--they've completely locked Gantenbrink out of this whole procedure, hijacking what is rightfully his "claim".

    2. Re:Why so long? by ibergman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Correct.
      It's also noteworthy that the CNN article about this completely fails to acknowledge Gantenbrink's achievements and incorrectly states that the door was discovered in 1872.
      A summary of Gantenbrink's work can be found at http://www.cheops.org
      -I.

    3. Re:Why so long? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      This shaft has been known for quite some time. Why has it taken so long to finally explore what many believe may be a significant find?
      Technological limits, my dear. The lower northern shaft has been explored before, but the exploration failed because of a sharp bend which was too-much for the technology of the time (and the current one, too).
  4. Previous attempt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A previous attempt to penetrate the mysterious
    shaft ended in disappointment when it was discover
    that Lara Croft's cross-section was too large to
    permit her entry into the shaft.

  5. Beware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the robot wakes the mummy, gets cursed, and comes out of the pyramid with XP embedded in it's firmware...

  6. Re:Short-term memory gone? by billbaggins · · Score: 2

    Yes, but there are new developments... specifically, UserFriendly's take on the matter. Clearly this is enough for /. to post the story again...

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
  7. Where's Geraldo? by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny

    After Al Capone's Vault, you'd think Geraldo would be a natural choice for this event.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  8. I think I'll explore that gopher hole.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    .. with this + this with a lot of that

    1. Re:I think I'll explore that gopher hole.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Wow! Good find, I didn't see that one. All you have to do is add beer then. ;-)

  9. The Hall of Records and wood in the Pyramid by dido · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Of course Hawass and his ilk are disdainful of this theory, but in the Sphinx, there is reportedly a hidden "hall of records" that is supposed to be under one of the shoulders of the Sphinx. According to Edgar Cayce, it was supposed to crumble away around the year 2000 and humankind's lost knowledge would be revealed. Naturally, Hawass and his ilk conducted extensive repairs of the Sphinx a year or two before Cayce's prophecy was supposed to come true, although there have been ground penetrating radar surveys that showed that there is indeed something there. Oddly enough, Mark Lehner was once upon a time associated with Cayce's estate and was a member of one of these teams led by SRI International that discovered this tantalizing evidence. What brought about his volte face so he's now 100% with the orthodox Egyptological establishment is unknown.

    But they aren't going to the Sphinx, right? They're shooting for that strange sealed door at the end of one of the shafts inside the Queen's Chamber. After Rudolf Gantenbrink discovered this mysterious door in 1993, which also had a wood fragment in front of it which Gantenbrink's robot couldn't pick up (and settle once and for all the question of when the Pyramid had been built), he was prevented from sending yet another improved robot down the shaft. Political pissing contest at the Antiquities Bureau sounded like. If they do manage to get the wood fragment, hopefully there'll be no cover up on the radiocarbon dating results. There has already been one (on the mortar used in some parts of the Pyramid, conducted in 1986) that gives a date for the building of the Pyramid about a thousand or so years before the 2500 BC date traditionally accepted by Egyptologists. Gee, so the Pyramid was supposedly built ca. 3800 to 2800 BC. In the Predynastic Period! Of course these results were universally ignored by Egyptologists as it would greatly upset the neat chronology they have for the building of the Giza monuments.

    This is what I get from reading too much Graham Hancock!

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    1. Re:The Hall of Records and wood in the Pyramid by thogard · · Score: 2

      The tunnles underneath the Sphinx are water wells.

      You see the Sphinx is (was) a rock outcrop and something like 6000+ years ago, someone figured out that water seeps up throgh the limestone layers where the outcrops are and if you dig down, you can get to the water. The Sphinx is also about a 1/2 day outside the Khan el-Khalili which is the traditional market in what is no Ciaro. A market has been there for at least 5,000 years or even much longer. If your going to ride a cammel from anywhere in North Africa to the Ciaro market, the area near the Sphinx would be a very good place to set up your last camp before hitting the big city.

      If you look at how nomads navigate, you will find that they would often describe hills and rivers in ways that would allow them to be used as unambigous waypoints. I supect over the years, the Sphinx was fixed up a bit by the travelers until some king decided to make it a grand monument. I expect its current form is the 3 or 4th major facelift.

      Water is very importaint in that region. Egypt has plenty of water but its all underground. Denying someon water in that region used to be a crime punishable by death. All religions that came out of that area currenly have things to say about offering drinks to strangers. That would lead me to think that marking points to find water might have been the ancient equivlent of a large donation to a charity.

    2. Re:The Hall of Records and wood in the Pyramid by Creepy · · Score: 2

      I vaguely remember reading that the sphinx had two or three facelifts. I think it started as a statue of Anubis, then got the face of one ruler, changed to another by another ruler, then that face was wiped out with most records and a third likeness was carved by another ruler.

      It's been too long since I've read up on egyptology, so I'm going off 15 year old recollections that I may have doctored up for Call of Cthulhu (but that, I think, was the real history).

  10. Re:To win this game you must kill me, John Romero! by Jugalator · · Score: 2

    I think they're actually *forced* to do that, since I don't think they're allowed to take rocket launchers with them without a really good reason.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  11. Seen before... by jvl001 · · Score: 2, Funny
    All those old enough to remember Al Capone's secret stash uncovered by Geraldo Rivera live on TV will know what to expect this time around.

    I predict that behind the stone at the end of the tunnel wil be ... more stone.

    --
    /. is to journalism as graffiti is to a bathroom wall
  12. Rudolf Gantenbrink's web site (1st robot in shaft) by wherley · · Score: 2

    This looks to be the web site for Rudolf G, the finder of the shaft plug/door that will be opened. Surprisingly, he seems not to be involved in this recent live opening project...more on that here where they quote Rudolf:
    "I became aware of National Geographic plans - for the first time - through the media 6th of August 2002..."

  13. I'm afraid... by kraf · · Score: 2

    that upon opening the door some booby trap mechanism will crush the chamber behind it because the scientists didn't follow some secret sequence when approaching the door.
    Haven't they watched the Indiana Jones series ?

  14. Like a cheesy horror movie. by Nutcase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Hey guys, look at that 4000 year old gigantic stone structure, which has what we believe to be a large room at the end of a long, bending, unaccessible shaft thats only 20cm by 20cm, and blocked by a large, tightly wedged limestone rock with brass handles in it.

    Even though it's painfully clear that people arent supposed to be opening up this heavily guarded chamber in the 4000 year old structure, and there is no real value for us in doing so, other than to satisfy our curiosity, lets send a small robot down there to pull the block out so we can send a camera in."

    I mean, sure, it /SOUNDS/ exactly like the beginning of an extremely cheesy horror movie.. but it's actually important science. At least until they open it and unleash the apocalypse. ;)

  15. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the UK site, there's going to be a live web cast.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  16. More resources by maunleon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another article, with pictures of the pyramid rover, and also some background on the Rudolf Gantenbrink controversy. He's the robotics engineer who (some argued) was left uncredited and uninvolved (not even invited to the opening?). I don't know the whole story.

    CNN blurb on this special (with video clip)

    The ananova take on the special.

    The Times (UK) take. Pretty good.

    A little on Zahi Hawass

  17. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... OT by jdcook · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "man, if I had cable, I'd LOVE to give you a divx of it. hell, I'd even mail you a copy of the cd. Why? Because it's frickin fair use! If you can't watch a show, it is within your FAIR USE to have someone to record it at a later time. My parents would always do that for me when I'd miss saturday moring cartoons to go to my sanchin ryu classes. that was fair use... that's the DEFINITION of fair use.

    Fair use isn't defined. It is a doctrine that exempts certain uses from copyright infringement. Having somebody make a recording of a broadcast and send it to Japan may or may not be fair use. You could look it up.

    OTOH, the original request post being "+5 Flamebait" just kills me. I say send that sucker.

    --
    Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
  18. Re:this was tried by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2
    I remember watching the original attempt to crawl up this shaft; and when they ran into the door. The team operating the robot just about jumped out of their skin in excitement.

    One thing that kind of pisses me off about the whole
    egyptology thing, is that the egyptian government is pretty strict on who they
    let come and do work like this over there. If they don't agree with some of your
    views on the history of the pyramids, good luck getting a permit to do anything
    there. The history of the pyramids is very sketchy, and how the traditional
    egyptologists think their theories are 100% correct is very arrogant.



    Please remember that the pyramids are Egyptian, not American, not English, etc... The Egyptian government is only protecting their culture, their history. And if it seems like they're are too harsh, too strict I think you need to remember that most Egyptian artifacts and surviving mummies are in foreign museums, not Egyptian. (The majority of the world's mummies are at the British Museum).
    I think that the American government (or any nation's government) would install the same strict laws and codes to protect its people's heritage from export.
  19. Re:Wait a second... live? by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Funny

    On FOX...naturally!

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  20. You can't carbon date stone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can only carbon-date biological material.

    There would be straw in the mortar, and they would carbon date that, to get a date for when the mortar was made.

  21. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... OT by morgajel · · Score: 2, Informative

    section 107 of the copyright act designates 4 factors, two of which are important:

    2)character of use: is it non-profit or education use?
    4)effect on potential market: will this make the product less valuable?

    you're correct, these aren't laws, they're guidelines.

    Since it's entering from one market where it's given away freely(TV, commercials not withstanding), to another person(not market) where it cannot be obtained by any reasonable means, I do not see where the problem would be.
    They only way I could see a problem with this is if it was being sold or otherwise exceeded the second guideline. it would also be a violation if it was given away enmasse to the public as a whole- however, since it's available on broadcast tv, that would not affect the market there either unless they later planned on broadcasting it to the unaffected region for profit(commercials). which would make it very difficult to exceed the 4th guideline.
    btw, IANAL, I'm just an idiot trying to bring some sense to the world..

    --
    Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
  22. Re:this was tried by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

    Yes, whereas the European usage of mummies for medicinal and alchemical purposes was much more enlightened.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  23. Re:this was tried by austad · · Score: 2

    Thanks AC for plagarizing one of my posts from the original story!

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  24. Re:You're going to be very disappointed... by JohnG · · Score: 2

    Looted by ancient civilizations with robots? If WE couldn't get in there till now, what makes you think people hundreds or thousands of years ago could?

  25. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... OT by JohnG · · Score: 2

    What makes you think anyone would think otherwise? Especially if you left the commercials in like he said. I REALLY doubt that Fox would do anything to you, for the exact reasons you mentioned. I think this is more a case of you ranting to defend rights that aren't in jeopardy.

  26. Xfer files by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Jimmy Haffa!? How the hell did you get in here?"

    "Shuddup and help me, kid. My legs are stiff."

  27. Tourism jump start? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    (* the egyptian government is pretty strict on who they let come and do work like this over there. If they don't agree with some of your views on the history of the pyramids, good luck getting a permit to do anything there. *)

    Aside from rewriting history, it is otherwise understandable seeing the past splunking that they have been subject to.

    Anyhow, there is some speculation that the government is allowing this right now because the terrorist attacks and their Palistine viewpoints have scared away tourists. This may be an attempt to re-spark the tourism industry.

  28. Re:Very tastefull by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
    'Welcome to Egyption Idol!
    Remember, only one statuette or figurine can win the title of number one ancient object of worship!'

    Host: Thank you Bob! Alright folks, just like the ancient mummies of the Sphinx - it's finally time to wrap this competition up!
    *ba-dum-crash!*
    Host:Thank you. And while we're at it - let's here it for those King Tut dancers! You guys have been great. You know Anubis was so upset about losing last night, he still hasn't gotten over it - I heard he's in de-Nile!
    *ba-dum-crash!*
    Thank you

    I could go on all night, but is that what you meant?

  29. Re:this was tried by MrNixon · · Score: 2, Informative


    . . . it was probably built between 5 000 BCE and 7 000 BCE. That date is before archeologists admit that homosapiens was running around on the planet.

    I don't know what archaeologists you talk to, but I'm pretty sure that we'e been on the planet longer than 9000 years.

  30. Re:But what if ... by 5alligator · · Score: 2, Funny

    so... what? you're suggesting the shaft leads to the lettuce crisper? the butter compartment? do go on - we want to know more!

  31. Wow! This might be as exciting as.... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    The opening of Al Capone's vault!

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Wow! This might be as exciting as.... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      "I KNEW IT! Road Maps!!!"

      Weird Al- UHF

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  32. They must be cellphone users ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 2


    Do Cell Phones Make Us Stupid?

    --

    The Raven

  33. Re:Wait a second... live? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

    The only way I know to air a show at 8pm Eastern and Pacific is to have it recorded! So now, is it live? Or is it recorded?

    Isn't 8pm EST 4am in Egypt? Gawd, I hope for the archaeologists' sake that it's recorded. Let 'em sleep in for crying out loud!

  34. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Ratings by blair1q · · Score: 2

    Gimme a slice. This will either suck, rock, or bore. No, it will bore and suck for 58 minutes, then be exciting for 10 seconds, then it will be over. Then AC Neilsen will count the suckers and collect.

  35. How do they move that block with that robot? by Animats · · Score: 2

    There are pictures of the block, and pictures of the robot. The robot doesn't look powerful enough to move that block. How is this done?

  36. Re:Wait a second... live? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

    You really wouln't want to be out there working in the full heat believe me. It's probably a good idea!

    That does make sense, though I don't know how hot it is inside the pyramid (where I assume the hidden chamber is). I tend to think of the inside of large stone structures as being cool. I don't know about pyramids, though.

  37. An Apology - OT by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    I seem to have unleashed a firestorm by asking for a copy of this program in an obviously evil format such as DivX.

    Sorry, my bad.

    Could one of you who knows me mail me a tape then?

    Cheers,
    Jim

    (I hear it will be webcast, but can you imagine trying to actually watch one of those for something shot in such low light? It would look like a cubist art video...)

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  38. This is VERY misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    >A bit of history here...Rudolph Gantenbrink
    >and his team discovered the door some years
    >ago. Zahi responded by rushing them out of
    >the country and making sure that they
    >wouldn't be able to come back.

    This is actually a VERY misleading statement. Gantenbrink, by way of Robert Bauval, let the word out on the findings of the 'door', whereas it is standard procedure for *everyone* who is doing research there to go thru the Council of Antiquities FIRST.

    That Bauval was associated somehow with it is probably what tipped the balance (for fairness, you can read Bauval's account of the events in Secret Chamber by RB, chapter 9 I believe). The combination of having an "alternative" historian (that means one who cherry picks his 'evidences') together with the the breaking of the rules relating to announcement of discoveries is a big no no for egyptology, simply because these things get out of control, in terms of wild and completely unfounded speculation, REALLY quickly.

    Many might not realize this, but there is a huge *industry* revolving around the "mysteries" of ancient egypt, where authors who know very little of (or chose to ignore) the HUGE coherent picture that egyptology is, ignoring montains of evidence supporting it and countless others that go against their own "brilliant" speculation, end up transforming a culture into a "legacy", heavily hinting at mythical places such as Atlantis (a spurious story already of which ONLY plato talks about, and in terms heavily metaphorical), and often sliping into concepts like "noble or higher race" and the like.

    The world of "alternative egyptology" is fascinating at first glance, but is roten from the inside, trust me on this.

    Another point is that the "door" hardly is a door, as it is located in a shaft that is 8x8 inches, unless someone has a book to write about little beings using this shaft as a corridor for their daily affairs (I suspect this would easily be linked to our alledged martian legacy in a sleight of hand). The two "handles" could be many things, but even if they are handle, that doesn't make the thing a door, it just makes it a plug, with handles.

    The third thing i'd like to mention is the latent hatred of that "alternative research" community toward people like Zahi Hawass, who has, despite these people crave to dig everywhere, been dedicated to protecting and researching the Giza site for many decades. Granted Zahi has a big mouth, granted he doesn't know how to talk to journalists, but his dedication and honnesty are obvious to anybody who looks into the field (and no, reading Graham Hancock's 'work' does not qualify). Mark Lehner is in a somewhat similar yet different position, since as an ex-Cayce believer, he began his career with the goal of finding things like the "Hall of Records" (his academic training was financed by ARE, the Cayce fundation). Having learned a lot since his debuts, and having grown up, he is now bashed by his old buddies for being honnest. (don't you find it strange for instance that RB's "orion correlation theory" used to 'lock' giza to 10500BC, just as Cayce 'predicted' ? Thorough examination shows there is no such lock to such an epoch to be found, and the OCT has now been reduced to a "astetically pleasing representation" that lacks any form of precision, and hence any predictive power, rendering 10.5kBC completely and utterly arbitrary)

    The way I see it, "alternadoxy" is jumping to the gun on this, let's just wait and see what they find, if they indeed find anything, because whatever is or isn't there, it'll be one hell of a special.

    The alledged hijacking of Rudolf Gantenbrink's work is a straw man, Gantenbrink is refered to in all the papers you will find in academia relating to the exploration of the shafts. The nature of research dictates that one researcher follows another on a site, research is not for personal glory, it's about uncovering the truth. That Gantenbrink isn't always mentioned in the press is not the big deal that "alternadoxy" makes of it, after all, Dyxon isn't either and probed the shafts many decades before Gantenbrink (in his probings, he did find that the southern queen's chamber shaft seemed to be blocked at the height we know of today as the location of the plug). Also Gantenbrink has been associated with this special, if only in providing his experience to the i-robot team.

    As for "why so long?", well the pyramids aren't going anywhere, these things always take time, specifically because we do NOT want to rush in. I think the REAL question to ask is :

    Why NOW ?

    Well, think about it, it'll probably boost egyptian tourism by solving a mini-mystery. That tourism took a big blow after 9/11.

    Now THAT qualifies as very good reason to be doing this now rather than later.

  39. Re:this was tried by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Interesting
    You're confusing your pseudoscientific theories. The erosion patterns aren't on the pyramids, which don't exhibit any to speak of that you wouldn't expect to find on a 5,000 year old monument in the desert that's been repeatedly vandalized over the millennia, but on the Sphinx. I'm not enough of a geologist to offer a genuine opinion either way, but it seems that most geologists don't agree the weathering on the Sphinx was caused by water. Of course, most of them haven't examined it firsthand either.

    Which may be neither here nor there anyway; the Sphinx was carved out of, and in part built on top of, a natural rock outcropping which is itself certainly older than human civilization. We shouldn't be too surprised to see weathering on it inconsitent with the time when it became the Sphinx instead of "that rock over there."

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  40. How many times are you going to post that? by devphil · · Score: 2


    You know, I thought I had read these same words before, on the last /. story about this two days ago.

    But I guess if the "editors" (who do no editing) are allowed to repost their own stories and call it news, a post author is allowed to copy and paste his own text from two days previous and get more karma for it all over again. :-) It works out.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  41. Re: That Hawass guy is full of crap by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > He was also totally reckless with the artifacts, are there so many in Egypt that they don't bother being careful any more?

    I saw a documentary once that claimed that there were so many mummies that they used to burn them for fuel in locomotives.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  42. Re:Short-term memory gone? by packeteer · · Score: 2

    just like any godo slashdotter i should be all over the previous article copy/pasting away all the +4/+5 comments to this new one to boost my karma... unfortunatly i hit the cap so im not going to waste my time formatting... just go to this link and see all the insightful goodness of the past article...

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  43. What they'll find inside by jonerik · · Score: 2

    I'm betting that the robot is going to see the inside of a place where teenagers have been partying for years; a mildewed matress in the corner, empty beer bottles and cans all over the place, and graffiti on the walls; stuff like "JUDAS PRIEST RULEZ," "VENOM," and "CLASS OF '86."

  44. Re:this was tried by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    I stand corrected.

    The majority of "above-ground" mummies are in the British Museum.

  45. Comic by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    Great comic about this story, here.

  46. Re:Very tastefull by jmccay · · Score: 2

    I wished the open up the chamber between the the two paws on the Sphinx--even if it's just a pin whole with a fiber cable and camera setup to look in it.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  47. Re:Can anybody who watched Fox on Monday describe by Angry+Toad · · Score: 2

    A space of several inches, then what appears to be another door. I say door rather than wall, as the sides of the shaft are pretty obvious going in past the new door. Didn't look very much like the old door, however. The old door was white, and had two metallic attachments. The new "door" is grey, cracked, and has no attachments. Nothing much visible on the floor either. Just dust.

  48. Re:It was a bust! by DennyK · · Score: 2

    Don't be silly. It's not a bust. It was all arranged with the original builders (you know, those alien dudes) so that Fox could air a sequel! In fact, the entire shaft is filled with little stone plugs every few feet, with some cheesy artifacts and heiroglyphics here and there to keep audiences tuned in. Proceeds from the advertising will help fund the alien's continuing integration into our society.

    Rumor has it that there may be some nasty traps inside the shaft also, so that in case the series doesn't work out, Fox will have plenty of footage for a few When Pyramids Attack! specials... ;-D

    DennyK

  49. Good point by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    How would we feel if tons of Egyptians came over and took over the study of American Indian stuff and kept looting treasure from burial mounds? Even if the occasional farmer had shredded a mound with his tractor, we wouldn't say that America had lost its right to the mounds.

  50. If only Monty Hall were here... by Creepy · · Score: 2

    And behind door #1...

    is door #2!

  51. Re:If someone's planning on making a DivX... by JFMulder · · Score: 2

    Score 5, Flamebait?!?!
    Can't.... compute....
    core dumped

  52. Re:You're going to be very disappointed... by JohnG · · Score: 2

    The door was 200 feet into the chamber, that is a REALLY long stick being wielded by someone with REALLY good low light eyesight. It was also 3.5" of solid stone, so it would have to be a pretty strong stick as well.