Slashdot Mirror


Thailand's "Q" Banks on Rubber Bullets

redwolfoz writes "ABC News reports that Thailand's answer to 'Q', the legendary inventor of gadgets for movie spy James Bond, is busy at work at his warehouse on the edge of the country's capital. Workmen inside are trying out the latest inventions of retired Major Songphon Eiamboonyarith, who runs defence contracting firm Precipart Co. The range includes umbrellas that shoot rubber bullets, bullet-proof baseball caps and a hand-held device to fire a man-sized net 10m to stop a villain in his tracks."

36 of 107 comments (clear)

  1. PHB's in Cubicle land by SupahVee · · Score: 2

    I wonder if that spiedy-net would work in an office environment. Would make dealing with the boss MUCH easier, I think. That and Herf wars go to a whole new level.

    --
    "See, we plan ahead! That way, we never have to do anything now."
  2. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by McCart42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not if it's a grazing shot to begin with. Besides, even if you're right, mild brain damage or a hemmorrage (chance of death) is preferable to a bullet in the skull (you're dead before you know what hit you).

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  3. Um... by mike3411 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't look like any of these inventions are particularly new, the US police force and riot response teams have been using/testing rubber bullet, bean bag bullets, nets, foam, sonic weapons, and other for the past several years. They've started deploying them to more and more officers, apparently it's lead to a number of situations where they were able to incapacitate and arrest someone they usually would have shot. So it sounds like a movement in the right direction, although I think these weapons get used more against rioters, drunks, the mentally ill, etc. I'm pretty sure they still shoot supervillains... or promote them.

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  4. Net launcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... a hand-held device to fire a man-sized net 10m to stop a villain in his tracks


    I think I can make a potato gun do that. :)
  5. I can see it now... by drik00 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man in tuxedo walks up to the bar, orders:

    "...Vodka Martini, shaken, not stirred... ...the name is Band...Rubber Band..."

    Yeah, so i'm a dork. Join the club.

    --
    Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    1. Re:I can see it now... by mickwd · · Score: 2

      Groan...

      Band ? You should be ;)

    2. Re:I can see it now... by passion · · Score: 2

      (where do I sign up? Oh, I guess I got my ID years ago at this website called slashdot, and my ID is #84900)

      "...Bondage, James Bondage double-OHH!-sixty-nine"

      --
      - passion
  6. Re:Not new here...new in Thailand by McCart42 · · Score: 2

    The article wasn't so much about how it's new and cool, but how they're new to Thailand, and very cheap and effective for the task at hand (mostly, training). Rubber bullets don't fly as far and are thus effective for training exercises in Thailand, where space is at a premium. The Howitzer shells they used to use cost over $200, but now they use rubber shells that are under $10.

    I mean, just looking at the "armored tuk tuk"...it's not like anyone's saying this is something amazingly cutting edge. Though it did remind me slightly of the "elite military vehicle" from Stripes...

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  7. credbibility by meekg · · Score: 3, Informative

    why should a rubber-bullet gun be disguised as an umbrella ??
    A rubber-bullet gun is for deterrence, and should look like a shotgun, or something even more evil.

    An advancing police line armed with umbrellas will most likely not cause a crows to disperse.

    More likely, the umbrella is quite lethal, in the assassination meaning of the word, but since this is a PG rated story, it's been modified A-Team style.

    Everyone's gotta have a hobby.
    Mr. Songphon's happened to be killing.

    o well.

    1. Re:credbibility by Squarewav · · Score: 3, Informative

      the idea is for protection, if you shoot some mugger with your umbrella, hopefully they run away thinking they've just been shot with a real bullet. as for just carrying a shotgun with you, your going to get some bad reactions from police and people on the street

  8. Not to much is really 'Bullet-Proof" by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bullet-proof is rarely what its called, a standard kevlar bullet-proof vest will stop many smaller caliber shots, but you can still get killed, even if the vest isn't pierced, if your hit in the chest with a powerful enough shot, even if the vest stops the round you can still die from hydrostatic shock, the same goes for the kevlar vests with metal inserts, they my stop powerfull rounds, but if u look at the after photos from testing, you can see the plates of metal with large(2 or more centimeter) deep depressions, it may not penetrate, but that much force hitting you in the chest is enough to cause quite a bit of damage

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  9. the gift by Squarewav · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My father was a soldier. He used to give me manuals on explosives and guns."

    Talk about the gift that keeps on giving, "hey what did you get for x-mas??" "My dad gave me that new transformer!" "That's nothing my dad gave me books on how guns and explosives work! I cant wait too try them out!"

  10. Is this guy high? by thelinuxking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Songphon says in three months Precipart will deliver to police in the south the firm's first armoured tuk tuk, Thailand's popular indigenous three-wheeled motorcycle taxi.
    1. I suppose he is going to cover up the sides of the tuk tuk, because it makes no sense to have just an armored canopy and open sides. If he seals it up it won't even be a bicycle anymore, but will be like an armored car, except with only 3 wheels. How original.

    2.In reference to the umbrellas: "They are designed for police use in hostage situations," says Precipart consultant Sanpetch Putarak, a retired wing commander
    The prototype umbrella is pink. How many police officers would normally be walking around with pink umbrellas?

    3. Police are expected to have things like rubber bullets. Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?

    4.The armored "tuk tuk" is equipped with a machine gun. Do you really need a web launcher in addition to that?

    However he DOES have one good idea. He plans to make walking sticks which fire rubber bullets. I like this idea. When you run out of bullets, you can just whack people with the stick.

    1. Re:Is this guy high? by delta407 · · Score: 2
      "They are designed for police use in hostage situations," says Precipart consultant Sanpetch Putarak, a retired wing commander
      How many police officers would normally be walking around with pink umbrellas?
      [snip]
      Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?
      What if you don't know that middle-aged woman walking down the street is a police officer?
    2. Re:Is this guy high? by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      If he seals it up it won't even be a bicycle anymore, but will be like an armored car, except with only 3 wheels. How original.

      Except the estimated price is $2,400.

      The prototype umbrella is pink.

      Featured word: Prototype.

      Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?

      It might be more of a gimmick that's fun to make and use than an actual useful-in-the-field product. You know, like a Desert Eagle .50 or something.

      Or it could be for under cover police.

      Just my $0.02,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    3. Re:Is this guy high? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Be quiet. How is that position "liberal", anyway?

  11. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Celandro · · Score: 2, Insightful


    You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? Brain damage you have........

    Helmets were first issued to troops to prevent death from grazing shots to the head as they were among the most common, if not THE most common cause of death (I believe this was WWI but dont quote me on that). A truly bullet proof helmet would be a great achievement and quite useful in combat and riot police situations.

  12. Thank goodness that "Q" is back by tyrani · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now maybe we can finally get someone working on the tuxedo from the Jackie Chan movie.

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  13. Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I just haven't thought about it enough, but why not pepper-spray paintball guns for riot control or other situations where you just want to incapacitate? You'd get decent physical range, with an automatic firing version excellent coverage.

    Regular mace or pepper spray requires you to be too close, "tear gas" or whatever they shoot in a gasseous cloud is too broad and not specific enough.

    Paintballs hurt like a sonofabitch, a repeater could deliver a lot of them at a good distance to clothes, faces, hair, etc, adding some longer-term deterrant effect as well (have to change clothes).

    From my experience, though, you'd have to "fix" the firing mechanism, since jams and fuckups with a tear-gas paintball would be a bit more than just an inconvenience. I'd make the paintball payloads more like conventional bullets, cased in a plastic cartridge. This'd solve a lot of feed issues as well as allow for more traditional box magazines. I'd also use conventional gunpowder propellant for higher velocities, larger payloads than CO2 can deliver.

    It might actually be possible to make a paintball cartridge a standard weapon could use.

    Of course the magic part is probably whatever membrane you use for the irritant payload. It has to be strong enough for firing and to really hurt on impact, but it also has to be soft enough to break on softer surfaces as well as not cause soft-tissue injuries other than bruising.

    A weapon like this would really seem to be a natural, especially in situations where you want to deliver a lot of firepower in civilian environments -- think of defending an Embassy with this -- .50s in the windows, guards with M-16s, all putting out 100s of rounds a minute of a chemical irritant instead of lethal bullets, risking a military conflict..

    Anyway, why haven't they done this yet?

    1. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Zrech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First of all, LAPD has them. They had them before they had bean bag guns. I have seen many demo's of this on a few TLC programs and other programs aswell. And it is not tear gas as those first 2 replys thought. The substance is bright yellow/green in color, and just a little more liquid then the pain in normal paintballs. On a few of the demo's I saw of this, a law officer shot another officer in the chesh from about 60 feet, the officer on the recieving end described it as being pepper sprayed but with more long lasting effects as the substance permiated his clothing.

    2. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alternative weapon systems are usually called "less than lethal", as a reminder that they can and do seriously injure people. As it is, there is a backlash against police overuse of pepper spray and things of that sort. Really I don't think police need too many options. A club, or a sap, and a sidearm are all I personally think they should carry. All these toys might look neat, but I think it encourages abuse. Sometimes technology isn't the answer, when the question already had perfectly good low-tech answers.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Shirloki · · Score: 2, Informative

      With those factors considered, a paintball, which is a hazard being shot at 300fps (lost eyes, broken teeth, bruises, welts, and other assorted nastys), could well almost become a lethal-"non-lethal" crowd control method.

      Actually, current "non-lethal" weapons, such as rubber bullets do kill pretty often. A pepper spray paintball would not kill nearly as often simply because of the fact that it explodes and absorbs much of its own force by itself. However, the pepper spray would do the deterrent job of beanbags and rubber bullets quite nicely. Obviously, that still doesn't help with severe eye damage, but if you pepper spray somone with regular mace, you're still gonna damage/destroy their eyes anyway.

    4. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by swb · · Score: 2

      And finally, they are very unreliable. In particular, balls sometimes break in the chamber or the barrel as you are firing. If you're just shooting paint this results in a mess and your gun jamming. If you're firing tear gas this could get pretty unpleasant.

      I raised that issue in my initial posting. In order for it to be a more effective weapon it would require 6" diameter accuracy at a range of 100 yards and have to deliver a cyclic rate of at least 3 rounds per second.

      That's why I thought loading the irritant projectile in a typical firearm-style cartridge would help a lot. Most of the paintball firing problems I had related to misfeeds, which I attributed to feeding the "naked" projectile and cheap and overly simple feed mechanisms. Protecting the projectile in a rigid casing would prevent crushing on a misfeed, and allow for a spring or other force feed mechanism, and allow the use of something other than CO2 as a propellant.

      The biggest challenge would remain the projectile membrane, as you need to walk the line between tough enough to hit ~500fps without breaking a projectile in the barrel but soft enough to break on impact without bouncing.

      Dunno why paintball accuracy sucks -- smooth bores? Too-soft casings flexing in flight? Inertial problems because of the liquid? Low muzzle velocity? I'd imagine they all contribute, but again it doesn't have to be a 500 yard sniper weapon. Hitting a 6" circle reliably at 100 yards from a long-barrelled weapon would be more than adequate, and I don't think even that it would get used that way. It'd be a burst or automatic weapon used to spray at smaller crowds, or in bursts of 3-5 rounds at individuals.

      A dozen guys with M16-type rifles could deliver a lot of irritant in a small amount of time. And it's not supposed to be just the irritant, it's supposed to hurt too.

  14. Villain Supply is the answer by xsfo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Villain Supply is the answer

  15. Err... no. by rjh · · Score: 2

    Err... no.

    Sometime ask the Second Chance company for one of their demonstration videos. You can see the founder of the Second Chance corporation put on a Second Chance armorvest and then take multiple 7.62mm armor-piercing rounds to the chest.

    Given that the 7.62mm is just about the most powerful round anyone is likely to encounter, I have to say you're full of crap. Even a 12-gauge shotgun offers less momentum and kinetic energy.

    1. Re:Err... no. by rjh · · Score: 2

      Not really. The rule of thumb is that a pattern spreads one inch per linear yard of travel. (The rule is off, but it's a useful approximation.) At ten yards, the pattern's only about ten inches across. Aim for someone's center of mass and the pattern will stay confined to their torso.

      Most gunfights between armed individuals take place well within ten yards, according to the most recent FBI crime reports.

  16. A really good book on the subject by Goonie · · Score: 2
    Is the U.S. Army's Improvised Explosives manual. Hundreds of tested, proven, bomb mixture recipes you can cook in your own kitchen, simple enough for any idiot.

    Not that I recommend you actually *try* anything in it unless you're faced with an occupying army, but it was fascinating stuff.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  17. Bad feeling by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that gets the feeling that they will be seeing some
    of these items at his next [A-Z]* protest?
    Don't get me wrong. There is something very fun about this in that
    "we will laugh about this when we are done with our court mandated
    volunteerism. But for right now I am in a lot of pain. Did they have
    to use the tear gas /and/ the the nets?" kind of way.

  18. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
    Helmets were first issued to troops to prevent death from grazing shots to the head as they were among the most common, if not THE most common cause of death...

    No. Fragments are what helmets protect against. As artillery is the most casualty producing element in modern warfare (even WWI) it made, and still makes a lot of sense. People shoot for center mass, not the head, so a helmet is a stupid way to protect yourself from bullets. As a way of protecting you from bombs, shells and grenades (blowing up at ranges that don't turn you to soup), a helmet is well worth the money and discomfort. The rest of your body is less jam-packed with vital parts and tends to be less exposed than your head anyway.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  19. Non-lethal means of control is a trick by capedgirardeau · · Score: 4, Insightful


    All this feel good bullshit about non-lethal means of controlling people being nicer and show that the authorities are really nice guys is a trick.

    More non-lethals controls are still controls and actually lead to an increase in the state powers and ability to surpress protests and dissent!!

    The easier it is for them to package it to the masses as a good, nice, humane thing, the easier it will be for them to get away with putting down people and their voices.

    As if we need more that these days.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:Non-lethal means of control is a trick by crusher-1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. My father was a cop in a major city and taught me the only time you should use any sort of projectile weapon is in situations where life is at risk. In the event that a weapon of this nature is to be used, it is to be used in only one fashion - you either shoot to kill or you don't shoot.

      Furthermore, while attending UCLA their basketball team won the final 4. A significant amount of the student body went into Westwood and became a bit unruly (as college students will). And of course non-students became involved and things got a bit out-of-hand. The L.A.P.D. sent out a riot control unit. At one point a non-student that was somewhat aggitated was surrounded by a groups of police. Then a stun gun - the type that shoots a bean-bag type projectile was fired at this person at close range. This guy fell as if he had been shoot with a generic projectile (aka bullet). He laid there for 10 to 15 minutes before anyone on the P.D. would take action to get the EMS in their. This only happened after the rest of the crowd became aggitated by the fact that someone that was essentially defenseless was injured and no assistance by the authorities was garnered. It was only then that the man was give assistance - and not before the P.D. dragged him behind the riot line by his feet.

      Point is, that supposed "non-lethal" weapons are not completely non-lethal. If the situations are right or the weapon is used in a manner not intended death can easily happen.

      And what good is a bullet proof baseball cap good for anyway. An umbrella that's just a camouflaged zip gun. Q he ain't. Just another mercenary trying to market stuff that the U.S., Stazi, and the K.G.B. have been doing since the 60's.

      In the U.S. this guy would either be working for the C.I.A./N.S.A. or be labeled as a criminal.

      Just MHO. :[

  20. Re:quality reporting by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

    Don't you see? He invented the net while the reporter was there!

    --
    ...
  21. Armoured tuk-tuks ??? by Zemran · · Score: 2

    Have you ever been around Bangkok in a tuk-tuk? They are incedibly unstable and the extra weight high up would make them so dangerous to the occupant that no one would need to do anything extra to hurt the occupants.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  22. Thailand: Widespread use of torture - from policin by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2
    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  23. Actually airburst & shrapnel washl by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    That's why helmets came back into vogue during WWI.

    Soldiers spent the vast majority of their time in trenchs where the only danger (bar poisoness gas) came from air-burst explosions & shrapnel being blown in from near misses.

    Hence the shape of British helmets with the broadlip all the way round, that gives as perfect protection a helmet could in regards to the danger of airburst & shrapnel wash to a soldier in a trench.

    That's why it the US military's obsession with helmets amazes me. It's ridiculous the way their troops in Vietnam, Iraq 'n Afghanistan are virtually always wearing helmets.

    Someone ought to tell them that slouch-hats (like the Brits wore in Burma, & the Aussies wore in North Africa & New Guinea) or Bush hats (like the Aussies wore in Vietnam) are much better protection from the elements (shading the face, keeping rain 'n sleet out of the eyes, etc) for jungle, dessert, bush & mountain warfare.

  24. .357 no problem 7.62 Tokerov big problem by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Bulletproof vests that stop .357 Magnum bullets is no big a deal.

    The problem comes with stopping smaller high velocity rifle ammunition.

    A level 3 Kevlar vest won't even stop a 7.62x25mm Mauser/Tokerov pistol round. The standard soviet pistol/sub-machine-gun round from WWII, which is bottlenecked & has a velocity of 1400+fps (the Chech CZ52 loads do 1600fps)