Slashdot Mirror


Boston's Big Dig Delayed Because of Programmers?

dalewj writes "This article in the Boston Globe explains that Boston's Big Dig will be ready to open on time, if the software developers and cable layers can get their act together." Turns out honeywell's software isn't quite ready.

42 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. It's supposed to end? by IPFreely · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the Big Dig was supposed to go on forever.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:It's supposed to end? by connorbd · · Score: 5, Informative

      The original plan was for several roads around it; someone mentioned 128, but there was also I-695 that was supposed to just skirt downtown. It was never built because it would have utterly destroyed a number of poor but vital neighborhoods, and because the inhabitants of those neighborhoods no longer trusted the Mass Highway Dept to take care of their interests (i.e. relocation, etc); there had been an awful lot of bad faith building the Mass Pike and the (old, elevated) Central Artery. Check out www.bostonroads.com for the gory details.

      Boston's highway system (with the exception of the Pike, which has its own connected but separate history) was designed around I-95 and the Inner Belt, but two major segments of I-95 (Canton to the South End and Revere to Peabody) were never built (the segment that was built is now I-93 downtown and Route 1 north of Boston), and the entire system is a half-baked mess because the core of the system was never finished. Depressing the Central Artery is supposed to alleviate at least some of the resulting mess by increasing the downtown capacity to handle the traffic that the Inner Belt was supposed to deal with.

      (And no, they can't build the Inner Belt now -- the northern ramps (built, but cut off -- a news crew once put up a prank sign saying "Out of town drivers exit here) now lead to Storrow Drive, one of the major roads that runs along the Charles River, and the southern ramps were demolished and replaced with a commercial-vehicles-only connection to the airport.) /Brian

  2. Waiting on Programmers? by da3dAlus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the software was working fine? I mean, that little guy on the screen is going to town with that shovel...

    OH, "Big Dig", I thought you said "Dig Dug".
    Nevermind.

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
  3. The Big Dig by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read about the Big Dig last year, thanks to someone's Slashdot .sig.

    Read more about it here.

    Basically, the thing has gone on forever, and will likely go on forever, thanks to beaurocracy. Blaming it on the programmers/cablers is probably little more than spin at best, or pre-election blame shifting by local "oh-fish-shulls" at worst.

    The Big Dig is apparently a huge fiscal landmine that some people claim will never reap the rewards of the optimists who keep greenlighting the moneystream.

    (On the other hand, I live far away, and am only going on a few websites' worth of info. So that's only one point of view. :)

    1. Re:The Big Dig by Zelet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I had a friend that lived in Boston for a long time. The traffic problems are so bad throughout the city that the people of Boston (a majority) wanted this to happen at all costs. This is a huge undertaking and I wish luck to all those who worked to complete it. One thing that I am not sure about (I should ask him), is what is the mass transit like in Boston? Do they have subways and busses that are easy and cheap?

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:The Big Dig by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of us up here in Boston just want the damn thing to end. It's getting there -- they've finished the bridge and lots of ventilation buildings, and they are starting to close up some of the massive holes they've dug.

      Mass transit in Boston is pretty good. you can go anywhere on the subway for $1, and the buses do a decent job of coverage too. The thing that sucks is that the subway turns into a pumpkin around 12:30am.

    3. Re:The Big Dig by Shynedog · · Score: 4, Interesting


      The Big Dig has indeed been going on for over a decade now. As a Boston resident, I'm definitely tired of it. But to be fair, it's not behind schedule simply due to incompetant beaurocrats (although there are plenty of those). The project itself is the single most complex undertaking of civil engineering in the history of the U.S. Any project of this scale is going to have delays.

      They actually have a pretty good website It has a really neat gallery of huge aerial photos, as well as some great maps of the whole thing. A good time-waster, if you enjoy looking at maps.

    4. Re:The Big Dig by dubiousmike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Subway and bus system is ok, though at times of the day is far too crowded to even get on when it arrives. Where the "T" can't be found, buses can. The coverage is commendable. Having said this, you would think that its pretty decent.

      But alas, I lived in Brighton (part of Boston - uses Boston police force) which is about a 10 minute drive from my work (near South Station, heart of Big Dig). For me to take pulic transportation to work, I had to use a combination of bus and "T" or just another bus that was few and far between. It would take me at least an hour to get to work via public transportation with either method.

      This is why I moved an hour south of Boston and drive (or occasionaly bus) to work. My rent is now 1/3 of that in Boston and my travel time is the same as before. Of course, my commute also contributes to the traffic problem. I am 55 miles south - commute ranges from 60 to 90 minutes. Commute home can take longer at times.

      FYI, there is a commuter rail that is planned to extend into the town (Fall River, MA) I live in in a year or two. This was supposed to actually be up and running by now. Unfortunately, the budget for the commuter rail is tied to the Big Dig as well. So when the Big Dig f's up and needs more money, they push back the expansion of said commuter rail.

      Exasperating. :P

    5. Re:The Big Dig by dhogaza · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's not just due to incompetent beaurocrats. This is Boston, after all, and there's been the traditional overhead of corruption, too. In fact, the dude who was project manager until one or two years ago has been blackballed by the Feds, i.e. will never be allowed to manage a federally-funded project again.

      Not only did the project go over budget by a big chunk, but a big chunk has been unaccounted for (or was during the days when I was spending about three weeks out of every eight in Boston, days which came to an end 15 months ago).

      No one knows for sure where all the money has gone, though anyone familiar with Boston is not surprised nor unable to make a few guesses.

  4. Software holdups...? That's kinda silly. by wls · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't understand how the software developers are holding up laying of the infrastructure. One would have thought that the software would be fairly independent of the media on which it operates.

  5. It can happen by tiltowait · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember the Denver airport opening delays because of the baggage system bugs?

  6. favorite quote by skydude_20 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Larry Bossidy, the just-retired CEO of Honeywell, one of the Dig contractors that may contribute to delayed openings of the tunnel sections, is in town tomorrow to give a speech at the Marriott Long Wharf to promote his new book. The title? Funny you should ask. It's called "Execution: The Discipline of Getting Things Done."

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  7. Re:IWNRTFA by DLWormwood · · Score: 4, Informative
    Why is it assumed that every article on /. pertains just to you?

    The Big Dig is a massive highway tunneling and reconstruction project to solve some of the serious gridlock problems Boston has. Since Boston competes with New York for convention attendance, this is relevant to many business travelers. (And MacWorld was once held there, and my be held there again.)

    I know this, and I'm not even from there! You see the Dig mentioned regularly on other news sites from time to time; been going on for years now.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  8. Why Federal $$$ Are Being Used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because of the Federal Aid Highway Act (FAHA) of 1956. Impressed by the autobahn's usefulness during WWII, Eisenhower wanted the same thing to be available in the U.S. in case the damned Russians ever invaded and we needed to move a lot of troops quickly. All major cities and their airports were supposed to be accessible, and the Big Dig was funded because it connects I-90 to Logan airport. The tunnels are also able to withstand heavy conventional bombing. Pretty damned cool.

    1. Re:Why Federal $$$ Are Being Used. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the Eisenhower dollars were to be meted out back in the 50's and 60's.

      Boston had already jumped the gun, and spent their own cash building their SkyWay, which turned out to be an utter piece of crap.

      So in the 70s they realized it was worthless, it divided the city in half, was ugly as hell, and couldn't support anywhere near the amount of traffic they had. So they came up with the idea of moving it all underground.

      Now, they couldnt afford it. So they went to congress with the notion that "hey, we didn't use up our eisenhower dollars, so you can give them to us now".

      Critics noted that Eisenhower wasn't president anymore, and the dollars for the Interstate plan at the time were a 'use it or lose it' type of thing. Many cities and states didn't use their entire allotment - they can't just go to congress now and ask them to pony up the dough.

      They got preliminary approval, but then Reagan scrapped it, calling it pork-barrel politics. Which it was.

      Funding was eventually re-approved, and here we go. Pissing away billions to correct a localised inconvenience.

      Most non-bostonians call it the Money Pit.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Why Federal $$$ Are Being Used. by avoisin · · Score: 3, Funny

      The tunnels are also able to withstand heavy conventional bombing.

      Clearly, this is a design claim that needs to be tested. I'll call the military.

  9. Tolls by Tycho · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So how much will it cost to drive on the highways in Boston after the Big Dig is completed? And why did everyone else in the country have to pay for something that will potentially not be free to drive on?

    --
    Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    1. Re:Tolls by crow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the tolls are going up on other highways. The Big Dig is mostly I-93, which will remain free. The tolls have already gone up on I-90, and are projected to go up again later. The only part of the Big Dig that will have tolls is the new tunnel to the airport. I expect they could do the accounting to say that that tunnel is the part that the state paid for.

      Though I would much prefer higher gas tax an no tolls whatsoever. The Mass Pike is a huge patronage system that exists primarily for the sake of providing perks for the powerful and connected. (Note, for example, that they didn't reduce the number of tolltakers when over half of the cars now use automatic EZ-Pass style transponders.)

  10. Re:Software holdups...? That's kinda silly. by Peyna · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That mindset is part of the problem. Most likely what happened was they needed something done a different way than originally planned, and since they assume software is the easiest to change, they put the burden on them to conform to everything. My guess is they tried to separate the software from the rest of the system and just assume the software would be easily able to change and keep up with everything else as needed, when instead they should have been developed together and treated as parts of a whole.

    --
    What?
  11. Clean Air by linderdm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know this isn't exactly about the article (software related), but I saw a television program on Discovery or TLC or something recently about the Big Dig, which described the ventilation system would make the air INSIDE the tunnels CLEANER than the air OUTSIDE!

  12. more like: by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. Sell out your construction company to an Irish mafia project
    2. Chill out for about 20 years. Take your time doing anything. Make sure you hugely overstep your price quote.
    3. PROFIT !!

  13. I-93 by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    I-93. Where else can you park in downtown Boston for free?

  14. Re:Why Should You Care? by daoine · · Score: 5, Insightful
    a decent chunk (>$13Bil) of FEDERAL tax dollars has gone to pay for the "Big Dig" boondoggle in Boston.

    That's likely due to the fact that the road involved is Interstate 93, which is grossly incapable of handling the current traffic loads through downtown Boston. The fact that it's an Interstate means that the Federal Government funds a portion of the construction.

  15. Regan the democrat.... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Err that well known "Democratic Party" Candidate and President Ronald Regan signed up to the funding of the Big Dig, funding was continued by another Democratic leader called George Bush.

    See those things waving at you in the distance ? They are the Facts, wander over and see them some time.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Regan the democrat.... by AlgUSF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know who tought you American Government/Civics, but doesn't congress do appropriation bills?

      I believe the Dems held congress during the Regan, and Bush(41) administrations. It was probably like "Mr. President, we won't pass your defense appropriation if you don't pass our pork barrel highway through Boston".

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  16. More roads by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Building more roads to combat traffic congestion is like buying a bigger belt to combat obesity.

  17. Re:Big Mess. by Havokmon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I wish they'd throw billions of dollars into my city and redo all the roads for us too.

    You need weasly city planners.

    For example. The federal govt WILL help pay for Interstate and intrastate highways. Around here, there's a lot of renaming of roads so the feds help rebuild/repave them. They do have to be used as 'Hwy 200' for a certain period of time before they can become eligable, but it's a way to get more money to widen/improve an older road.

    Either that, or the people who setup the road system did a really poor job. Considering I sometimes have to wait 25min for a train by my house, on a 4 lane intrastate hwy, I wouldn't entirely rule out past incompetance.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  18. I'm a programmer in BigDig... by LordHunter317 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is not the programmers. Its the **** software we were given to work with.

    The problem starts with the fact that we are the second contractor to pickup this problem, and we are required to adapt the first contractor's software to our needs. The software we have been given to work with is shoddy, badly coded, and still targets VAX C (even though it runs on an Alpha). Problems tend to crop up, and no one here really understands the system, including our contractors from the original system.

    We also have all sorts of problems hiring (due to problems both on our side and their side of the table). We are never given enough money or time, and everyone here is vastly overworked.

    The CA/T (Central Artery/Tunnel, or the BigDig) doesn't understand our needs or concerns, and getting help from them and their reps is like pulling teeth. Its like going to a frickin' Wrestling match, with petty arguments and name calling and bullshit all around.

    Their requirements are frequently illogical and unclear, meaning time has to be spent on fixing the requirments that could better be spend on coding. We have all sorts of reliablity problems with the Alphas and assoicated hardware. It also takes about a pound of paper work and 3 days to be able to do anythign to the production systems in Boston.

    The project is just one political mess, and to be honset, we are the CA/T's bitch, and get blamed for anything. The truth is that ev eryone is behind schedule, and that even if we are late deliviering, it will not matter because the tunnel will not be physically completed anyway. Kinda hard for the software to work if there's nothing out there for it to work with.

    Ok, enough ranting for now. Feel free to reply or e-mail questions.

    1. Re:I'm a programmer in BigDig... by rodbegbie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forgive me if I misquote:

      * It's not our fault, it's the previous contractor's.

      * It's not our fault, it's management.

      * It's not our fault, it's the client.

      * It's not our fault, the requirement are fuzzy.

      * It's not our fault, it's the politics.

      Well, bad news, bucko: Welcome to the software industry. You've just used up your quota of excuses. You cannot bitch about a project until the next fical year.

      rOD.

      --
      Rod Begbie done this, and he's not
    2. Re:I'm a programmer in BigDig... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      The problem is not the programmers. Its the **** software we were given to work with.

      Oh come on, four-star software sounds pretty good to me. You're scoring it on a five-star scale, right?

  19. Re:Can't be "on time" by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

    no, it's not behind schedule. The original plans were for 1994, but those got scrapped as the project got bigger and they realized exactly how long it would take

    So why don't they just ask the geeks how long the software will be, and then push it back again? :o)

  20. Facts back At You...Veto Override by N8F8 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Kennedy, Senator Edward M. -

    U.S. Senator who ensured the passage of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987. This act included the federal funding for the Big Dig. President Ronald Reagan had vetoed this bill earlier that year. The senate voted to sustain this veto. Senator Kennedy allied with West Virginian Senator Robert Byrd to force a revote in the senate to override Reagan's veto. The revote was approved. At that point Kennedy and others put pressure on the deciding vote, namely, Senator Terry Sanford of N. Carolina. They threatened to pull tobacco subsidies to North Carolinian farmers. Under this pressure, Sen. Terry Sanford changed his vote and the Big Dig bill became law in April of 1987.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  21. Mod parent up. by TheReverend · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a programmer on the project also, he got everything exactly right.

    --


    "Let me open these blinds so the snipers can see in." - Kevin Giffhorn
  22. Yet you have time to read /. by gatkinso · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get back to work, you.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  23. Re:IWNRTFA by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny
    What does it do for those of us living in just about any other city?
    Excavates your wallet.
    Kinda chaps your quiddick, don't it?
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  24. Presidents DON'T control the budget by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Congress controls the budget, not the president. Congress was mostly controlled by the Democrats at the time the dig was approved.

    The President only gets to sign or veto whole spending bills. They have little control over the specifics. Presidents can send it back and say "you have spent too much" but it is politically impossible for him to say "take this out, put this in, take these 3 things out, put these two in". That is why I wish the President had a line-item budget veto. A Republican congress tried to give a Democrat president (Clinton) but was overturned on Constitutional grounds (probably for good technical reasons). But I wish they would amend the Constitution on this one.

    Brian Ellenberger

  25. I know my taxes go into a big hole in the ground.. by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I didn't know the hole was in Boston.

  26. Re:Big Mess. by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Troll

    "You need weasly city planners."

    The Reagan administration vetoed the fed funding for this project calling it a huge pork barrel.

    Our senior U.S. Senator, a big fat pork expert, managed to push it through.

    Whenever there's a bridge in the news, you can expect to see the name Ted Kennedy.

  27. Subways fine, "Trolleys" suck by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are 4 lines on the Subway system, and all are based upon getting people downtown. The subways head downtown and out. Within each of the 4 colored lines (5 if you count the new Silver Line, which is a fancy bus at this point, but will be a legit extension to the Subway system in 10 years when completed) there are some splits, where they go to different, yet similar locations.

    This was useful when all employment/shopping was downtown, but presents some problems as the economy spread from downtown Boston. If you are going anywhere that requires switching trains, you will be spending a minimum of 30-45 minutes on your trip. Busses can help with this, as they cut between different lines, but until a few months ago the route numbers weren't posted and the website remains difficult to use. While commuters can figure out the busses to simplify their commute, it simply isn't practical for an individual trip.

    Beyond that, the system gets really slow. I live out on the Green Line, which is the most residential of the trains. After Kenmore Square, they become "Trolley lines" that are above ground, but have a dedicated area for their tracks. This means that the trains can't pass one another if one gets bogged down, and there is no meaningful way to run express trains.

    The road system is a collection of disasters because of Boston's heritage. Boston is unable to rework their roads without shutting down the city, and an execessive number of buildings are declared historical, stopping progress.

    On top of that, the elevated central artery, which the big dig will replace, cuts through Boston. Now ask yourself who would want to live right near a highway (and walk underneath it), and you realize why the Central Artery trashed the neighborhoods. Walking under a highway is a strange thing, and it cuts neighborhoods apart. This results in social costs in excess of the traffic.

    Part of the problem with the subway system is that it is too slow. Even in Rush Hour, it is faster to drive then take the subways. If the trains go above ground (the Green Line), they are stuck waitting for lights like cars, and they have a 30 MPH limit (same as the official speed limit) plus they need to stop.

    An additional problem is the system only runs trains once every 10 minutes (most busses are every 30 minutes). This makes the subway painful for short trips. If you are only going a few stops, you might spend 15 minutes waitting for the train for a 5 minute trip.

    Boston has transportation nightmares. Unlike New York, that does construction at night, all road construction is done during the day in Boston, including during Rush Hour. The unionized workers don't have to put in overtime, so sometimes jobs will involve ripping up a street on Thursday/Friday, then MAYBE getting to fix it Monday or Tuesday of the next week. However, if it wasn't planned that way, it may be a week or more before they return with equipment.

    The Big Dig will help with the highway crunch, but won't solve the general problems in Boston. The only nice thing will be if the Big Dig does enough, then people will take Highways (they'd be faster than city streets for a change) which might alleviate some of the other traffic. More likely, driving to work in Boston will be more pleasant, so people will get more cars bringing us back to the status quo.

    Well, at least the friends of the powerful were able to buy all the slumlands next to the highway that is about to become parkland. They're going to make a fortune on those luxury apartment complexes that used to be crack houses or slums.

    Alex

  28. Re:Of course.. by bluestar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lots of cities have terrible traffic problems. I'm stuck halfway between Baltimore and D.C., both could use a new multi-billion dollar traffic infrastructure.

    And when the Big Dig is finished, and Baltimore, D.C., Manhattan, Detroit, Chicago, London, Paris, Tokyo, etc. see how cool it is, they'll know how to do it because we'll show them how.

    --
    "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson
  29. Easy by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long have you been doing corperate software?

    You make the polling configurable as suggested by the requirements - of course the only option you can choose when configuring is... 3 seconds!

    Then when they ask to add to the range, you note that the entire system was built around requirement (1), and that you'll need one year to add any other options.

    Unless of course for brevity you've left out that the operator had to be able to change the polling to a certain range of values. Then you're toast.

    Seriously though, good luck to all of you - I've been in projects with requirements like that before.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Boston's Big Dig Delayed because of Slashdot? by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Further invesitgation into software delays in Boston's Big Dig project traced the source of the problem to an internet technical news site, Slashdot.org.

    A survey of the projects network logs showed that queries to the Slashdot website occured at an average interval of 37 seconds, or 3 minutes and 5 seconds per user assigned to the project.

    Project spokesmen indicated that a planned installation of software to curb employee access to the website has been delayed due to lack of available programmers to do the installation.