Slashdot Mirror


Handshake via the Internet

mattlamb writes "British and American scientists will touch using sensors over the internet. "The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet." " Let the juvenile comedy commence!

31 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. What about the latency? by Tom7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

    1. Re:What about the latency? by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup. My wife demands at least 900s latency from me - sometimes more. 50ms would be ummm.. dissapointing to say the least.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:What about the latency? by Fembot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget latency.. what about packet loss, DDoS attacks and corrupted data???? That could be very very nasty :-)

    3. Re:What about the latency? by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 5, Funny

      lol

      SOunds like you might need to readjust your TCP Receive Window Size Calculation.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    4. Re:What about the latency? by weave · · Score: 5, Funny

      .. then there is worrying about man-in-the-middle attacks... You begin on one gender and then your partner is moved to someone else of another gender without your knowledge.

  2. Let's hear it for by LumpishGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...hardware handshaking!

  3. Is it just me.. by Laura_007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    wouldn't this be a step backwards? It is ignoring the vast mental conveyance abilities of the internet to revert to the warn physical ideas that most people are so impressionable about. I think that this might reignate the prior discussions that we've had regarding psychological attachment disorders. People should learn to communicate via things like email or ICQ.

    Thanks for reading!!!!

    --
    I am looking to accumulate friends. Please click on the circle and add me as a friend. Thanks!
  4. oh my! by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. develop internet touch sensors
    2. start porn site
    3. ?XXX?
    4. Profit!!!

    1. Re:oh my! by spasm · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can delete step 3 I think.. : )

  5. Too much.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny


    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    One would hope this could be discussed without immediately putting your mind in the gutter, but with quotes like this, it's impossible. It's obvious what these scientists are really trying to develop.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Too much.... by back_pages · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just can't believe they said "wood-like or fleshy." It's thinly veiled one-liner after thinly veiled one-liner.

  6. I am praying.... by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny

    that one of them is a practical joker.
    American Scientist "And that concludes this historic First Ever Trans-Atlantic Handshake."
    Brit scientist (to his buddies) "He he, he thinks the glove is on my hand!"

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  7. Now even more ways to get shot down by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

    1. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


      Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

      No, that is the beauty of this: You hack into somebody *else's* action.

  8. first internet fake-out by lamz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Shake, partner!"
    [stretches out hand]
    "Psyche!"
    [deftly runs hand through hair]

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  9. ping - poke? by shoptroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will 'ping' now be replaced by 'poke'? Gives a new meaning to the term 'finger' on IRC and other communication systems

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  10. Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait for the followup story: "Script kiddies hack robot hands -- scientists recovering in hospital after repeated punches to the face"

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  11. More info from MIT by burrito37 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a lot more info in this press release from MIT.
    Using this for telemedicine sounds particularly interesting...

  12. Had to be said... by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pull my finger!

  13. What this means for Politiicans by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blunder of the Ages
    By Reporter AC

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In what amounts to a new twist on an old and venerable tradition, Senator Trent Lott (R) accidentally kissed a hand and shook a baby during a fundraiser in his home state of Mississippi today. The technical glitch was quickly discovered to be caused by an aide plugging the new TouchMeFeelMe internet tactile simulator backwards, but the parent of the jostled child was even less pleased than the baby according to witnesses. More...

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  14. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sampling x number of sensors with y bits of precision 1000 times a second? Um yeah, that's pretty damned high bandwith.

    Figure you need a fairly high value of x to determine things like woody / fleshy material, lets say 100 per square inch. (I have no idea if 100 is really reasonable, it may be more like 1000.)

    Then you also need some decent resolution of those sensors, say 8 bits worth.

    Then we get 100 * 1000 * 8 = 800000 b/s or around 800 kb/s (would that be 781?)

    Now, my hand has more than 1 square inch of surface area, so scale appropriatly.

    Subtract compression, add TCP overhead, and that's still several megabit at a minimum ... for just the sensor info of the handshake. If it is more like 1000 per square inch, then we talking even more.

    And I always thought you only needed 3 TCP packets to make a handshake :)

  15. The Device They Are Using by istgut · · Score: 5, Informative

    The device they are using seems to be the Phantom by SensAble Tecnologies (product page). I used one of these a few weeks ago at USC's Integrated Media Systems Cetner, they're pretty cool. If you are interested in this kind of thing, the field is called "haptics," from the greek "to touch."

  16. Tele-Dildonics by Phoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Craig Charles (Dave Lister on Red Dwarf for those not in the know) at a sci-fi convention mentioned this technology or something similar to it. But he had issues with it. His bigest concern with having sex like this over the internet was thus.

    What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

    I know that would concern me

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  17. Re:Oh I can't resist by BuffJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait for the research to go commercial? Try the FuckU-FuckMe, the ultimate remote sex solution! :-)

  18. On a more serious note... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I happened to have worked on a project much like this one over six years ago for a customer of mine.

    The article glosses over the fact that there are very, very few genuinely practical applications for this because of two insurmountable problems.

    For one, our experiments at the time demonstrated that the hand-control idiom suffers from any lag; specifically that delicate manual operations are basically imposible with latency as low as 30ms which rule out things like surgery done this way. Hand dexterity depends on a very large number of relexive immediate movement in response to subtle stimuli like minute vibration of the tool, perceieved resistance, etc.

    The second problem is one that operators of such devices very quickly become disoriented, often nauseated, because of the discordance between years of ingrained knowledge of how the world reacts to touch and the lagged/different input such tools provide.

    People need to learn /new/ idioms for remote manipulation, not attempt to emulate biological systems. That's the same peoblem AI research has suffered from its inception: the day computers will display intelligence is when researchers start working on computer intelligence instead of trying to simulate human intelligence.

    Same goes with tools.

    While this might be a geekly thing to do (handshake over the net) and quite a bit neat, it's neither revolutionnary nor interresting in the long run.

    -- MG

  19. Re:Just hax0r them for christ's sake by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to mention "remote hole."

    Ok, now it's getting yucky. I'll quit.

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

  20. Re:You Know Whay This Means! by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the words of Dennis Miller:
    "when the day comes that a unmployed steel worker can strap himself into his Barco-Lounger and fuck Claudia Shiffer for 19.95 an hour, it's going to make crack look like sanka"

    --
    Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
  21. Uh, yeah by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's like a really sophisticated version of a Nintendo Game Glove. Or a MS Sidewinder Controller with Force Feedback.

    Sorry, I don't see whats so awe inspiring about sending data through a network.

    Maybe it's just me.

  22. Help desk uses, part 2 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ann: "Hey, this new remote hand technology is great for our tech-support desks."

    Bob: "Do you mean like showing callers how to reboot and find the Esc key?"

    Ann: "No, for slapping sense into clueless idiots."

  23. Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Why is it that "scientists have done x over the Internet" is automatically newsworthy? The same demonstration performed over a cable between two adjacent rooms would not have been significantly easier. Stuffing arbitrary data into TCP packets is just not that hard.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  24. One of my favorite Slashdot comments... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I went to college, there was a girl named Teresa Watt who had an account on the RS/6000. My buddy Rob had tears in his eyes when he showed me that you can actually "finger twatt".

    Thank you AC... where ever you are.