Slashdot Mirror


Handshake via the Internet

mattlamb writes "British and American scientists will touch using sensors over the internet. "The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet." " Let the juvenile comedy commence!

128 of 411 comments (clear)

  1. Oh I can't resist by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 4, Funny

    Porn Stocks Skyrocket!

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    1. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can just imagine this as some sort of perv Turing Test: "Is it a man, a woman, or a machine operating the hand?"

    2. Re:Oh I can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there needs to be a (-1 : Predictable) moderation option...

    3. Re:Oh I can't resist by BuffJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't wait for the research to go commercial? Try the FuckU-FuckMe, the ultimate remote sex solution! :-)

    4. Re:Oh I can't resist by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2

      I prefer telegraphed, but what do I know. I am not a cynical anonymous coward. :-)

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    5. Re:Oh I can't resist by yobbo · · Score: 2

      No no, stocks in producers of fufme products skyrocket!

    6. Re:Oh I can't resist by jyang · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many posts on slashdot is not predictable, esp those opinionated ones.

      --
      --- You make things foolproof, and they'll find you a damn fool.
  2. What about the latency? by Tom7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

    1. Re:What about the latency? by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2

      Just think of all the money you could save on creams and salves, not to mention the mental anguish of thinking about baseball or Bea Arthur in a bikini by merely generating your own packet loss.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    2. Re:What about the latency? by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yup. My wife demands at least 900s latency from me - sometimes more. 50ms would be ummm.. dissapointing to say the least.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:What about the latency? by !splut · · Score: 2

      Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

      Neither does the age of the sexually transmitted computer virus...

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    4. Re:What about the latency? by Fembot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Forget latency.. what about packet loss, DDoS attacks and corrupted data???? That could be very very nasty :-)

    5. Re:What about the latency? by ahaning · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean S&M?

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    6. Re:What about the latency? by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 5, Funny

      lol

      SOunds like you might need to readjust your TCP Receive Window Size Calculation.

      --
      (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
    7. Re:What about the latency? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      A real geek would use a Perl script to satisfy his wife:

      for ($i=0;$i<10000;$i++) { &lick(); }

    8. Re:What about the latency? by weave · · Score: 5, Funny

      .. then there is worrying about man-in-the-middle attacks... You begin on one gender and then your partner is moved to someone else of another gender without your knowledge.

    9. Re:What about the latency? by radish · · Score: 2

      You say that, but I think a DDOS connect flood from 000's of people at once could be kinda fun ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    10. Re:What about the latency? by unicron · · Score: 2

      I can't even BEGIN to tell you what's wrong with that code. For starters, trying actually writing some code for that subroutine and maybe do something with the $i variable. Just a thought.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    11. Re:What about the latency? by echophase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Snippit from the Linux Orgy HOWTO:

      echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward

    12. Re:What about the latency? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the Receive Window Size is just right. The incoming packets may be a little too small, though.

    13. Re:What about the latency? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Somehow the idea of sex with 50ms latency doesn't sound so appealing...

      True, but you can play it back at 10x speed later. "Yeeeeoooooowzeee! Gimme more baby! 20x! No no, not reverse! Owch eek ooch! Buffer overflow, STOP!"

    14. Re:What about the latency? by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

      But aren't DDoS attacks usually based on TOO MUCH data? I'm not sure that would be a problem, other than being very tiring...

    15. Re:What about the latency? by Dan+D. · · Score: 2
      Oh man that gives me a icky feeling. You know, like that sound you get when you're listening to your smooth classical music and suddenly the net skips out and the music skids CRRRSSHHHHHHH totally jarring your ears.

      So now you've got some soothing touch on your skin and then suddenly the net skips out on you... nasty.

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    16. Re:What about the latency? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      And a geek who has a girlfriend would know to use:

      while (climaxcount<MAXCLIMAX)
      lick;
      No need to gild the lily, as it were.
  3. not funny by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 3, Funny

    say old chap, that's not my hand...

    and thus teledildonics became a reality.

  4. Hey! by soapvox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Att can ressurect thier Ad reach out and touch someone

  5. Other possibilities? by Hates · · Score: 4, Funny

    "first transatlantic bitch-slap over the Internet."

    1. Re:Other possibilities? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm waiting to read about the first haptic murder. Would a phantom knife cut?

    2. Re:Other possibilities? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a new form of vigilante justice against spammers.

  6. Adds a whole new meaning... by myov · · Score: 2

    ...to "Reach out and touch someone"

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  7. Let's hear it for by LumpishGenius · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...hardware handshaking!

  8. The fulfillment of the porn industry by jonerik · · Score: 2

    And million rejoice as the glory hole finally achieves perfection!

  9. Is it just me.. by Laura_007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    wouldn't this be a step backwards? It is ignoring the vast mental conveyance abilities of the internet to revert to the warn physical ideas that most people are so impressionable about. I think that this might reignate the prior discussions that we've had regarding psychological attachment disorders. People should learn to communicate via things like email or ICQ.

    Thanks for reading!!!!

    --
    I am looking to accumulate friends. Please click on the circle and add me as a friend. Thanks!
  10. zzzzz! by bartash · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet the UCL side will have a hand buzzer http://www.gagworks.com/gwp_0235.htm

    --
    Read Epic the first RPG novel.
  11. oh my! by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. develop internet touch sensors
    2. start porn site
    3. ?XXX?
    4. Profit!!!

    1. Re:oh my! by spasm · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can delete step 3 I think.. : )

  12. Too much.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny


    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    One would hope this could be discussed without immediately putting your mind in the gutter, but with quotes like this, it's impossible. It's obvious what these scientists are really trying to develop.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Too much.... by back_pages · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just can't believe they said "wood-like or fleshy." It's thinly veiled one-liner after thinly veiled one-liner.

  13. I am praying.... by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny

    that one of them is a practical joker.
    American Scientist "And that concludes this historic First Ever Trans-Atlantic Handshake."
    Brit scientist (to his buddies) "He he, he thinks the glove is on my hand!"

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
  14. 1000hz != High Frequencies by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Since when did you need "very high frequencies down the Internet using newly developed fiber optic cables and extremely high bandwidths" to transmit up to 1,000 Hertz of information?
    Does anyone here think that 1000 != High frequency and shouldn't require high bandwidth or special fibre optics?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:1000hz != High Frequencies by WPIDalamar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sampling x number of sensors with y bits of precision 1000 times a second? Um yeah, that's pretty damned high bandwith.

      Figure you need a fairly high value of x to determine things like woody / fleshy material, lets say 100 per square inch. (I have no idea if 100 is really reasonable, it may be more like 1000.)

      Then you also need some decent resolution of those sensors, say 8 bits worth.

      Then we get 100 * 1000 * 8 = 800000 b/s or around 800 kb/s (would that be 781?)

      Now, my hand has more than 1 square inch of surface area, so scale appropriatly.

      Subtract compression, add TCP overhead, and that's still several megabit at a minimum ... for just the sensor info of the handshake. If it is more like 1000 per square inch, then we talking even more.

      And I always thought you only needed 3 TCP packets to make a handshake :)

  15. Hard, wood-like or fleshy by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    There's no way I believe that quote wasn't designed for maximum comedic potential.

  16. Handjobs over the internet? by Winterblink · · Score: 2

    I don't think too many people will trust a hydraulic robot hand to their gizmo. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  17. Now even more ways to get shot down by dubiousmike · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

    1. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by El_Smack · · Score: 2

      I have been not getting action from women all over the world for years! Glad to have you aboard, though.

      --


      There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    2. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


      Now I can NOT get any action from women all over the world!

      No, that is the beauty of this: You hack into somebody *else's* action.

    3. Re:Now even more ways to get shot down by Zemran · · Score: 2

      and giver them a virus :)

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  18. Yeah yeah ... pr0n ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    But what about this new technology in conjunction with Real Doll? Now THAT's a money making idea.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Yeah yeah ... pr0n ... by Tablizer · · Score: 2


      "Damn damn damn! I accidently selected 'Ru Paul' instead of 'Rub'. Fucken menu clutter!"

  19. hehhehheh by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Funny

    tcp wrapper...heh heh heh

    --
    My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
  20. What is the hardware? by HogGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What is providing the "feel" on the remote end?

    Is it a suit? and "hand" like object? a glove?

    The article is very vague! Anyone find other article on this?

  21. Better technology already available... by MoThugz · · Score: 2

    For more info, click on this link...

    Will be especially helpful for people whose posts contains the phrase "free pr0n".

  22. first internet fake-out by lamz · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Shake, partner!"
    [stretches out hand]
    "Psyche!"
    [deftly runs hand through hair]

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  23. article says it all. by ChimChim · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet."

  24. ping - poke? by shoptroll · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will 'ping' now be replaced by 'poke'? Gives a new meaning to the term 'finger' on IRC and other communication systems

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  25. Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait for the followup story: "Script kiddies hack robot hands -- scientists recovering in hospital after repeated punches to the face"

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 2

      There are just some things hydraulic robot hands should not be used for. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Hacker fun by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2

      "Script kiddies hack robot hands -- scientists recovering in hospital after repeated punches to the face"

      The story would be..."Hackers hack robot hand...." the followup would be "Talentless script kiddies duplicate ad nauseum"

    3. Re:Hacker fun by Winterblink · · Score: 2
      Heh:

      ping -t 127.0.0.1

      woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo! woohoo!

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  26. More info from MIT by burrito37 · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a lot more info in this press release from MIT.
    Using this for telemedicine sounds particularly interesting...

  27. I didn't want to go there by eclectus · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was gonna maintain the moral high ground (HA!) and not go for the obvious pr0n joke, but then, the best thing that could be said was already in the article....

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    --
    This signature is a waste of 42 characters
  28. Latency? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't the latency levels cause alot of interaction to start looking like a Stooges bit?

  29. Wooooohoooo! Commencing Juvie Humor! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Is that a PDA in your pocket or are you just happy to see me?

    Reach out and grope someone!

    I touched someone overseas, and got a nasty virus!

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

    When will we have bras made out of this?

    I hope we don't /. someone's groin!

    We can make politicians wear this on their head, and punch them when we don't like their votes!

    I've installed this in all my chairs!

    and finally:

    OMG! It feels just like Natalie Portman slathered in hot grits!

    Thanks, I'll be appearing at K5 on Saturday!

  30. Give Credit by ksplatter · · Score: 2

    I think everyone out there should take a minute to give these smart people a HAND for the great JOB they have done.

    They Have single HANDedly created many JOBS for alot of Ugly Women!!!

  31. There is no handshake.. it's just hoped... by xintegerx · · Score: 2, Informative

    All they will try do is pick up a cube by working together somehow. A handshake in terms of what we know a handshake to be might not exactly happen.
    Two scientists -- one in London and one in Boston -- will try to pick up a cube between them and move it, each responding to the force the other exerts on it.
    (...)
    The implications of the experiment could be vast, said UCL, which describes the event as the world's "first transatlantic handshake over the Internet."

  32. too many pr0n references by digidave · · Score: 2

    Here I am reading the story and thinking "I have a great pr0n joke for this" only to discover that every comment is already a pr0n joke of some kind.

    Can't you people think of something more useful for this technology than that? Like for instance... um... er... do you think they could incorporate this into one of those Real Dolls?

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  33. Spam safety by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spam will not just annoy, but now send you to the doctor.

    "Mom! A pop-up ad poked my eye again. I'm bleeding!"

  34. Speed/frequency confusion? by crush · · Score: 2
    The secret behind the technology is the speed at which the successive impulses are sent -- up to 1,000 Hertz," UCL said in a statement.
    Well, I can see that high speed would be essential to this, but what the hell does that have to do with the frequency? Also, is the uniqueness of this project that it's the longest distance that feedback has been attempted over? Because distance surgery / telemedicine has been happening for a while. Or did those earlier attempts not have feedback? I know I attended a demonstration involving localized feedback from a robot using Fast Ethernet over a couple of hundred meters.
    1. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by akiaki007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've decided not to mod and am going to reply to you. Frequency is very important when sending information. The higher frequencies travel faster and longer distances than those at lower frequencies, and have the ability to penetrate more surfaces. Thus, the higher frequency talked about here means that the information will be able to travel faster and farther than something at a lower frequency. Think prism.

      --
      "Time is long and life is short, so begin to live while you still can." -EV
    2. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by crush · · Score: 2

      Ah, thank you. Sampling frequency increases the granularity of the feedback then. Makes sense.

    3. Re:Speed/frequency confusion? by plastik55 · · Score: 2
      No, you're confused. All light in a vacuum travels
      at the same speed. But in many mediums blue light propagates faster than red. That's WHY colors are refracted differently in a prism; the angle of refraction depends on the ratio
      of the speed of light inside the prism and out (Snell's law).


      And for God's sake stop crapping ellipses everywhere, OK?

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  35. Had to be said... by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pull my finger!

    1. Re:Had to be said... by anzha · · Score: 2

      That's covered by the guys doing the I-smell or whatever it was...

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  36. Interactive Computing... by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story reminds me of a concept a friend shared with me a few years back... he was interested in how much people would pay to shock him remotely over the 'net, and watch the reactions. He had the concept of a web-camera on him constantly, so that you could deliver the shock and watch the results...

    Sample scenarios:
    * eating cereal... ZZZzzzttt... milk everywhere
    * on the bowl... ZZZzzzttt... poo everywhere
    * frosting a cake... ZZZzzzttt... frosting everywhere

    (etc, ad nauseum)

    This is also the guy, however, that said he wanted to be buried with a webcam, so that people could watch him decompose over time, but that's another story altogether...

  37. Just hax0r them for christ's sake by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 2

    Brings a whole new meaning to "man in the middle attack," doesn't it?

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:Just hax0r them for christ's sake by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to mention "remote hole."

      Ok, now it's getting yucky. I'll quit.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

  38. More information on hardware by Arakonfap · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this link describes the hardware being used - atleast an earlier version of it. Found through google "touch device phantom"

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/1998/phantom.ht ml

  39. What this means for Politiicans by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blunder of the Ages
    By Reporter AC

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In what amounts to a new twist on an old and venerable tradition, Senator Trent Lott (R) accidentally kissed a hand and shook a baby during a fundraiser in his home state of Mississippi today. The technical glitch was quickly discovered to be caused by an aide plugging the new TouchMeFeelMe internet tactile simulator backwards, but the parent of the jostled child was even less pleased than the baby according to witnesses. More...

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  40. The Device They Are Using by istgut · · Score: 5, Informative

    The device they are using seems to be the Phantom by SensAble Tecnologies (product page). I used one of these a few weeks ago at USC's Integrated Media Systems Cetner, they're pretty cool. If you are interested in this kind of thing, the field is called "haptics," from the greek "to touch."

  41. Tele-Dildonics by Phoenix · · Score: 5, Funny

    Craig Charles (Dave Lister on Red Dwarf for those not in the know) at a sci-fi convention mentioned this technology or something similar to it. But he had issues with it. His bigest concern with having sex like this over the internet was thus.

    What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

    I know that would concern me

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    1. Re:Tele-Dildonics by rlowe69 · · Score: 2

      What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

      Just to let you reassure you, it would be among the friendliest people in the world! ... if you catch my drift.

      --
      ----- rL
  42. TCP/IP by Merlin42 · · Score: 2

    So if they use TCP/IP for the transport/network layer do they need to do a 3-way handshake? ...<groan>. Ok, ok, they are probably using UDP/IP in which case there is no actual handshake ... hmmm .. very matrixy ;)

  43. Forget latency! by Gruneun · · Score: 4, Funny

    This makes the threat of a man-in-the-middle attack sound even more dangerous. Ewww.

  44. already been done by fatbitch · · Score: 2, Funny
  45. On a more serious note... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I happened to have worked on a project much like this one over six years ago for a customer of mine.

    The article glosses over the fact that there are very, very few genuinely practical applications for this because of two insurmountable problems.

    For one, our experiments at the time demonstrated that the hand-control idiom suffers from any lag; specifically that delicate manual operations are basically imposible with latency as low as 30ms which rule out things like surgery done this way. Hand dexterity depends on a very large number of relexive immediate movement in response to subtle stimuli like minute vibration of the tool, perceieved resistance, etc.

    The second problem is one that operators of such devices very quickly become disoriented, often nauseated, because of the discordance between years of ingrained knowledge of how the world reacts to touch and the lagged/different input such tools provide.

    People need to learn /new/ idioms for remote manipulation, not attempt to emulate biological systems. That's the same peoblem AI research has suffered from its inception: the day computers will display intelligence is when researchers start working on computer intelligence instead of trying to simulate human intelligence.

    Same goes with tools.

    While this might be a geekly thing to do (handshake over the net) and quite a bit neat, it's neither revolutionnary nor interresting in the long run.

    -- MG

    1. Re:On a more serious note... by Montreal+Geek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      [...]I'm going to have to disagree with you on this. For now, yes it's easier for us humans to adapt to the technology, but ideally any machine should be intuitive enought that there's no need to learn anything new[...]

      Yes. And no. I think that emulating biological emulation is the absolute best example of counter intuitiveness; unless and until those emulation are perfect (which means at the very least interfacing at a neural level, absolute replication of every aspect, and no added latency) the fact that it is almost, but not quite, like the "real thing" is going to make learning to use it harder than it would be to use an arbitrary system.

      Just look at the problems adolescent humans get trying to use their own limbs because their specs keep changing subtly, making them not-quite what they were when they were kids. The joke about teenagers tripping on their own feet because they forget how to use them isn't much of one.

      Transparent and intuitive are perfect goals, but modeling tools against biological equivalents is the wrong way of acheiving this.

      Look at a very simple interface: a door handle. There are no biological equivalent, but it does its task in a very simple fashion most humans learn without trouble.

      You're working under the presumption that biological systems are inherently easier to comprehend, but look how long it takes humans to master their own body enough to walk, and most will never master it enough to dance ballet.

      -- MG

  46. Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    If successful, it could allow people to touch and feel each other over the Internet.

    Hands Across America could be succesful this time - with only two people.
    This could have interesting ramifications (no pun intended ;).

    Seriously, people are already more physically separated than ever; rather than bring people closer, lots of technology has only widened the gulf.

    I don't think I'm breaking any new ground here, many /.ers have been in a place in their lives where they've not had close relationships (platonic or otherwise). Even holding someone's hand has a positive effect on people's mental-well being.

    Could this be more isolating than positive?

    1. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by kenp2002 · · Score: 2

      You Said:
      Even holding someone's hand has a positive effect on people's mental-well being.

      I Say: Your not holding someone's hand with this system. It would be no different than holding a water ballon or any other object/force that has some resistence. There isn't a person there holding your hand. All that your holding is an imitation. I don't see how the two can compare even if there is a "real" person on the other end of the system. I think that as technology continues on, the question isn't that of isolation, but more of a fundamental decline in the Humanity of our lives. The human element is under a seige. This is just another step in the genocide of what it is to be a real living human being. Why leave the house or interact in reality when you have all this technology to do it for you? I see many /. posters that see no difference in meeting someone in a bar in Everquest than in the "REAL" (a term that is becoming more and more subjective) world. I find this pattern of behavior sickening. It makes the human existence trivial and "Obsolete". The terrifying aspect of this, as the value of REAL humanity diminishes so does the value of humans in general. People complain about being a number or a statistic. I find it funny (and sad) that they don't seem to mind being reduced to zeros and ones.

      My 2 cents. No time for spell check, sorry.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    2. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by kenp2002 · · Score: 2

      That is the point, IT'S NOT CONTACT. It is SIMULATED contact. I don't dispute there there is SOME value to the interaction. But to equate a simulated handshake to a REAL handshake is disturbing to me (just me, maybe I am overreacting). Concerning all the above people (Especially those who are mental disturbed) is an email or phone call EQUAL to a real visit? If you were in a retirement home is getting an email the same as someone visiting? Of course not. There is a reason family get together when they can, email, video postcards, or simulated meeting online is not the same. To reduce emotion to a bunch of biological functions, ignoring spiritual aspects of the human existence (I can hear the athiests sharpening their swords now) devalues the unique human experience and puts us on the same level as bacteria. I agree with you 100% but you missed the core of the argument I think, I am talking about the trend of equating these simulations with reality.

      I simply ask this, if the trend continues where will the line be drawn between fantasy and reality, human versus machine? Where will the value of an individual originate then? Will going to a virtual funeral be equal to a real one? What becomes of the personal sacrifics we make in order to interact with each other? This is scary shit when you carry out the equation to the end when you dig into the concept of human worth. A good book to read is Lathe of Heaven and Brave New World. Both show the loss of the human value to an extent.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    3. Re:Best last line ever, and some thoughts. by bobdotorg · · Score: 2

      Hands Across America could be succesful this time - with only two people.
      This could have interesting ramifications (no pun intended ;).


      No pun achieved.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
  47. world peace, or world pieces? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm. I wonder if W will use it to give Saddam the finger? Perhaps if leaders can flip each other off, using camel parts even, then it will diminish the desire to nuke each other. Then again it might have the opposite reaction. It would be easier to offend somebody with various body guestures than before.

    I can envision a military guard next to the red button. Suddenly a finger pops out of his/her screen and presses it. "It wasn't me who pressed it, General, I swear to God!"

  48. Next stop, Holodeck by billmaly · · Score: 2

    And then society and science will HALT development. Once we can all climb into the holodeck and roll our own reality.....what's then the point of anything else?

  49. Re:You Know Whay This Means! by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the words of Dennis Miller:
    "when the day comes that a unmployed steel worker can strap himself into his Barco-Lounger and fuck Claudia Shiffer for 19.95 an hour, it's going to make crack look like sanka"

    --
    Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
  50. Generating your own packet loss by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is that what the kids today are calling it?

  51. Uh, yeah by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's like a really sophisticated version of a Nintendo Game Glove. Or a MS Sidewinder Controller with Force Feedback.

    Sorry, I don't see whats so awe inspiring about sending data through a network.

    Maybe it's just me.

  52. Help desk uses, part 2 by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Ann: "Hey, this new remote hand technology is great for our tech-support desks."

    Bob: "Do you mean like showing callers how to reboot and find the Esc key?"

    Ann: "No, for slapping sense into clueless idiots."

  53. telephone prOn just as good? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Probably more erotic for two people talking on telephone to tell each where to touch each other and then make appropriate pleasure noises. Letting your imagination fill in the the rest can be very erotic. Ditto for reading pr0n compared to viewing it.

  54. Assault? by 53x19 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where would the trial be for getting assaulted by one of these devices? Source of or at the receiving end of the bitch slap?

  55. There's already an internet vibrator by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    http://www.bluevibrator.com/internet-vibrator.html for those who immediately jumped to the pr0n possibilities...

    I guess that saying about the pr0n industry really pushing the envelope of internet technology as a driving force is true, then...

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  56. Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...Why is it that "scientists have done x over the Internet" is automatically newsworthy? The same demonstration performed over a cable between two adjacent rooms would not have been significantly easier. Stuffing arbitrary data into TCP packets is just not that hard.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Though This One Is Worth It For The Comedy... by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

      It's not the basic experiment that is trivial. It's the "over the Internet" part. The story would have gotten no coverage had the experimenters been in adjacent rooms.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  57. Sounds like the makings of the first pleasure dome by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Now combine this with some good VR technology and presto, you strap your self in, put on the goggles and insert the credit card...

    Imagine a cybersex cafe instead of an internet cafe... you'd go in, and there'd be a counter, you'd slap down your credit card and the person would say "Room #15"...

    Yup, lots and lots of people are going to get rich and a lot more are going to get some pleasure... Now the next set of moral questions... if you go have sex with a machine, is it cheating??? Technically your just masterbating...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  58. Patent Issues by frenchs · · Score: 2

    When patent time comes, could the fu-fme be considered prior art? :)

    Steve

  59. One word: by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
  60. erm... by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 2

    this technology will do wonders for www.fufme.com

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  61. Re:Oh Jesus God by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    'At last, I can be gay over the Internet.'

    Might have more fun that way. I doubt women will flock towards this. Heh.

  62. Read Lawrence Lessig ASAP by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2

    In "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace," Lessig talks about how the architecture of the 'Net used to enable the blind, deaf, ugly, and quadrapedal*. Everyone had to deal with the same narrow-band stream of text.

    Now we've got things like videoconferencing, voice chat, the ability to swap pictures of--presumably--yourself, and it's making the Internet more like the regular world. Lessig, however, didn't make any strong value judgments about the change, simply using the fact to illustrate that changes in code can alter how the online world is experienced.

    Then again, following the links you provided, you may just be a bit weird in the head. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    * [read: "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.]

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  63. Good touch... by Tattva · · Score: 2
    Or bad touch?

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  64. This is fascinating stuff. by DohDamit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. Legal documents can be signed over the Internet. People can put their actual signature down on a piece of paper(provided there's a webcam so they can see what they're signing.)

    2. Provide someone with a transparent mask, and you have talking heads. Beyond the humor factor, you can see all the things they're not saying with their words.

    3. Boxing matches, over the Net. Fight games, oh, and UT5 will be a whole lot more fun.

    4. Back to serious applications, medical procedures could be performed, once this technology was sufficiently advanced. Doctors already wear scopes. Throw on some gloves with this tech and you can hire the best surgeon in the world to perform battlefield surgery(or for those who don't have war on the brain, surgery performed out in the middle of the wilderness.)

    Yeah, I get the porn. Blah blah. So what. This advance is truly amazing, and we'd be fools not to see what we can do with it.

  65. Hardware EOF? by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Extension of Finger.

    So will we have to change the ol' phrase:
    "You can pick your friends,
    and you can pick your nose... ...and with this script you can pick your friend's nose too." :-}

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  66. All three? by docbrown42 · · Score: 2

    "You can not only feel the resulting force, but you can also get a sense of the quality of the object you're feeling -- whether it's soft or hard, wood-like or fleshy."

    What about all three: Hard, wood-like and fleshy?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  67. Re:Help desk uses, part 2 - Semi-Reality by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    Wow.. now nudie sites will not only be virtual reality but semi-reality. It will allow users to keep both hands on the keyboard and still get the "full" expeirence of "nudie surfin."

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  68. Prosthetic applications? by jmcwork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Could this technology be used in some way to create 'feeling enabled' prosthetic limbs? I know there would still be issues with impulse delivery to the brain, etc. Just a thought

  69. One day closer to.... by Yunzil · · Score: 2

    the fufme drive becoming a reality.

  70. Fantasy Emma Peel by jlowery · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you guys get this installed to help with my fantasy Emma Peel choice? I'm really having a hard time deciding.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  71. Teledildonics via fax by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    What happens if you get a power surge? Rips your dick off and faxes it to Canada?

    Yeah, it'll arrive on my fax machine...MWA-ha-ha-ha-ha! (I have such fun with these little surprises, don't you know...)

  72. and after... by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

    The first transatlantic handshake will be shortly followed by the first transatlantic thumb wrestling competition.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  73. Before you get excited by Chardish · · Score: 2

    Remember everyone's excitement over "Virtual Reality" technology, circa 1994? What did it get us?

    Clunky helmets, oversized gloves, blurry screens, and generally something very much unlike reality.

    Maybe such technology will have practical applications in 30 some years. Imagine playing a game of tennis using balls equipped with these "phantoms" and an invisible opponent from across the country.

    Be excited for what the future holds, not tomorrow.

    -Evan

  74. One of my favorite Slashdot comments... by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I went to college, there was a girl named Teresa Watt who had an account on the RS/6000. My buddy Rob had tears in his eyes when he showed me that you can actually "finger twatt".

    Thank you AC... where ever you are.

  75. bbc link by loconet · · Score: 2

    Here is another article on this story.

    Sounds interesting

    --
    [alk]
  76. "frames per second" for touch by CvD · · Score: 2

    I learned the other day that touch, unlike sight, needs a much higher "frames per second" to be realistic. While for sight, 50 times refresh per second is sufficient, for touch this apparently needs to be in the order of 1000 times per second. I'm wondering if this connection is able to deal with this?

    Cheers,

    Costyn.

    1. Re:"frames per second" for touch by CvD · · Score: 2

      Never mind... I should have RTFA first. :-)

  77. No it wouldn't. by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

    This isn't about chat, sex (despite the jokes), your social life or mental problems - it's about conveying a certain type of information to the appropriate senses. There is a lot of information which can't easily be conveyed via text or even video but could be very well conveyed using touch.

    This type of technology opens up a lot of possibilities. I'm sure you could also scale up or down the sensations you are feeling. Feeling and picking up that softball sized object may translate over the wires to moving a tiny obstruction in the patients aorta or moving ten-ton boulder in the road. In either case you can *feel* if it slips, if you picked it up off center, or if it is stuck on something.

  78. Standards Implications !! by serutan · · Score: 2

    It will become increasingly important to use SOAP before SAX, especially over a dirty connection.

  79. It's not you, either, you troll. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    But I'll answer this seriously anyway. We have almost a responsibility to do anything technological thing which we can which does not hurt people. While this technology may one day be used to hurt people (killer robots in your house being run by martial arts pimps ensconced safely elsewhere... it's a bad horror movie already) it will also be used to perform surgery, fix things, and have sex, probably not at all in that order. The latter will open up whole new legal cans of worms; is it legal to pay someone to have sex with you through teleoperation? What if they're in a place where selling fucking is legal? What if YOU are in a place where selling fucking is legal, but they aren't? Et cetera.

    Anyway we the people of the internet have added webcam and voice support to various IM clients, so you can have (low quality) video chat with other people around the world. Eventually you'll be able to interact with them physically, too. Basically it doesn't matter if we cure HIV/AIDS, we'll have a sexual renaissance one way or another. :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  80. Re:Agreed by kevlar · · Score: 2

    Someone smoking a cigarette raises my insurance premiums however...

  81. whole new meaning by squarefish · · Score: 2

    for 'personal computer'

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  82. Re:Sight, sound, and touch. Never smell or taste! by alizard · · Score: 2
    Find out who bought the iSmell technology. They had an interesting idea based on microvials on a chip controlled by standard digital inputs, they had in mind smell-enabling Websites. If nobody bought it, you might be able to buy it at fire-sale prices.

    They were hoping that they could get this put onto PC packages as standard equipment.

    Unfortunately, they had the usual kind of VCs... who pulled the plug as soon as the dot.com turned into the dot.bomb .

    I'd already downloaded a development kit. The possibilities for someone with an... unusual sense of humor were compelling. They had a set of instructions... basically Javascript sorts of things, IIRC... as I said, this was supposed to work with code embedded in Web pages.