Slashdot Mirror


Boston TV Signals Disrupting Police Radio in NJ

jeffy124 writes "WCVB, a digital TV station in Boston, is disrupting police radio communications in South Jersey. It seems that under certain weather conditions, the signal reaches here travels 270 miles (it's normally 50) and blacks out the police frequencies, making communication between officers and from 911 call centers impossible. The article seems to suggest that as more TV stations go digital, more small-town police radio will be affected, as the digital signal is significantly stronger than analog. Insert Joisey-joke here."

39 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. I think it's a safe bet... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think it's a safe bet that we'll see more donut commercials on digital television broadcasts- it ensures that it reaches the best possible demographic that will be influenced by donut commercials (cops, of course).

    1. Re:I think it's a safe bet... by Xenographic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, you've forgotten about the recent economic downturn. I never realized just how bad it was until a friend told me about a cop who was a friend of theirs. It was so pathetic somehow--with his budget, he could no longer afford donuts... :]

  2. Joisey Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    NJ got all the toxic waste dumps. You see, California drew the short straw and got all the lawyers.

    1. Re:Joisey Joke by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's true about NJ mosquitoes. They've adapted and actually are attracted to mosquito repellant. When a busload of tourists comes to the Jersey Shore from NYC loaded with mosquito repellent, the mosquitoes go into such a frenzy that they actually bite the picture of the greyhound on the side of the bus. Within a few hours, the bus is so swollen that it can't fit back through the Lincoln Tunnel.

  3. Did someone say 'Joisey joke'? by Skirwan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Insert Joisey-joke here.
    I broadcast in Joisey. Do you broadcast in Joisey? I broadcast in Joisey.

    Really? What frequency?

    --
    Damn the Emperor!
    1. Re:Did someone say 'Joisey joke'? by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Score 5 Funny?

      I'm guessing the moderators who modded that up have never actually been to New Jersey. Now, for one thing, the Meadowlands (up north close to NYC) is the only place that's even remotely smelly or of poor conditions in NJ that I've seen so far. Much of southern NJ was made up of small farming communities until recently when actual townships started forming. Most of NJ is now just that; small townships with hardly anything in between but trees, connected only by small (two lane) roads. I just moved to NJ a few years ago, and I'm not offended by comments - just the ignorance that their content shows. If you want to make a joke, call the people here simple, or make a comment about how almost everything is closed after 6pm, or how there's so much farmland. There's no accents in New Jersey; you're thinking of certain sections of NYC. These are (for the most part) normal, simple people who are MUCH friendlier and happier than the people from the DC-metro area. No one here says "joisey", we say "jersey". I must admit, however, that I was a bit surprised when I moved here from Maryland and couldn't find someone with any accent for a while.

      Oh, and by the way, our gas is cheaper than most places in the country, and it's full service everywhere (state law). When my relatives in MD were paying $1.90 for gas, we were paying $1.25. NJ isn't such a bad place when you actually take a turn off the NJ Turnpike.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  4. It's called by pa-guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    tropospheric ducting.

    1. Re:It's called by Xtraneous · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tropospheric ducting is your friend! Actually my first experience with tropospheric ducting was on a sunday night around 10pm, and I was able to reach a radio station in Ironwood MI (about 250miles from where I am,) with fairly decent quality. What was playing in Ironwood? Well... simple, Hearts of Space. IMHO one of the best radio shows around.

      --
      .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
    2. Re:It's called by mesocyclone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Years ago (almost 40!), I was a transmitter engineer at KANU-FM (110KW, Lawrence, KS - University of Kansas). One night we got a call from a station in Florida that was on the same frequency. They had shut down their transmitter for maintenance, and our signal immediately started coming in on their studio monitor.

      I also used to monitor the local police, who in those days were operating on VHF Low Band (30-50 MHz). That same ducting caused some southern, very rural and very hick-like (this was the 60s) sheriff systems to come come in on the same frequencies. Things got really wierd - especially since neither side knew what was going on.

      Tropospheric ducting is kewl.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  5. Joisey Joke? by thesolo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, this is slightly OT, but speaking as someone who lives in Southern NJ, I would like to state for the record that no one around here speaks with that type of accent. We all pronounce Jersey with the letter R, thanks!

    Most people have a large misconception about New Jersey, especially thinking that it all looks like Newark, every woman has huge hair and long fingernails, and that none of us pronounce the letter "R". While this isn't entirely untrue (head up to Northern NJ to see what I mean), it does not describe the area of NJ being affected by the Boston signals. As I always say, they should split up Northern & Southern NJ, and combine the Dakotas. :)

    Back on topic, I saw this story on the local news here tonight. It's a very big problem, as peoples lives can potentially be at stake. This is something we will be seeing a lot more of in the future; we already have frequency problems with 802.11, and now it seems that TV broadcasts will be continuing the trend.

  6. Re:"Insert Joisey-joke here. " -- NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not gay, no dick goes in my ass

    Only in California do you have to state these as two separate items

  7. Not the only occurence by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for a PBS station in VA, WHRO. We are currently being sued by a station WBOC-TV Salisbury, Md to stop the rollout of our Digital TV because it disrupts their signal on the Chesapeake side of the water.

    From what I understand of the problem their were bad assumptions made by the FCC when it came to the digital signal.
    1. That it would not bounce and doppler like analog signal does. Well it turns out it is even more prone to it than analog was due to the higher frequencies and watages involved.
    2. That this would not affect a $Properly setup atena. Seems reasonable until you find out what the variable properly is. Apparently the FCC does not care about interference unless the atena is aligned directly towards the sending tower (that never happens and varies from channel to channel) and that it is not higher than 30 feet (one story home. Any deviation from that and it becomes your problem, not theirs.

    This is also not the first case of this to happen. Their are previous cases in california and milwauke. Read more
    here

    This is going to crop up as more and more channels go digital. You will start seeing it reported more as stations start to battle each other. The sad part is that most likely the FCC will wash their hands initally and the airwaves will become as if the FCC does not exist.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:Not the only occurence by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 5, Informative

      That it would not bounce and doppler like analog signal does. Well it turns out it is even more prone to it than analog was due to the higher frequencies and watages involved.

      Somewhere a ham radio operator is crying.

      I think the term you are looking for is propagation (the way signals travel through the ether) :). In general doppler shift isn't that much of an issue unless the transmitter is moving very fast (like a low earth orbit satellite)

      I have no idea what frequencies digital tv stations operate on, but in general on uhf tropospheric ducting is pretty rare - at least where I live.

      Where analogue tv channel 2 (around 57 mhz) long range propagation is pretty common, but thats not tropospheric ducting - thats sporadic e layer propagation.

      Past tv channel 7 tropospheric ducting is relatively common.

      Past tv channel 13 tropospheric ducting still happens, but its not nearly as common.

      I don't see why the mode would matter - I think digital television is a spread spectrum signal. If done right you should be able to operate other ss devices in the same frequency space. Narrow band radios recieve ss signals as low background noise typically - so that should be an issue. I wonder what the real interference problem is?

  8. geez! by jeffy124 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I'm the submitter. I see a few posts denouncing the "Joisey" reference. I'm from NJ. It takes a sense of humor to live in NJ. I know that SJ is vastly different from the smokestacks of Newark.

    Am I the only person who lives in NJ with a sense of humor?

    (oh, and for the record, I live between exits 3 and 4)

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  9. Random related question by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I heard this once but never confirmed it: Is it true that Air Force One's broadcast system uses the same frequency as, and occasionally interferes with, garage door openers?

    1. Re:Random related question by borgboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      hmmm....I dont know. I do know that Air Force One does have a large array of different comm systems in place, including UHF SatCom and I believe Iridium-style gear. But to call it "AF1's broadcast system" sounds a lot like you're saying it has only one communications system, which is certainly not the case. AF1 has to communicate with NORAD, the Pentagon, the White House, not to mention being capable of patching into the conventional phone network.

      --
      meh.
  10. Gratuitous link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  11. Cutting into signals... by euxneks · · Score: 4, Funny

    [cop] breaker breaker we have a
    *shhkt*
    Johnny!. Don't you walk out on
    *shhhkkt*
    a caucasian male running down to
    *shhkkt*
    The LOVE boat...
    *shhlkt*
    suspect changing direction, now he
    *shhhkkt*
    was the president of the united states, saying
    *shhhkt*
    God dammit! where the hell is that
    *shhkt*
    sheik condom. Barely there for the most pleasure

    =)

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:Cutting into signals... by Veovis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Digital TV to Police: Can you hear me now? Good!!!

  12. Tropospheric Ducting Forecast Maps by KernelSanders · · Score: 5, Interesting


    VHF / UHF Tropospheric Ducting Forecast Maps

    These maps graphically display unstable signal areas.

    Quote from the website:

    The areas noted in the forecast have the necessary atmospheric conditions to produce tropospheric bending of UHF or VHF TV and radio waves. Tropospheric bending extends the range of stations well beyond their normal limit. Distant reception along straight line paths becomes possible..though the longer the path, the higher the Index required. The pursuit of distant stations is called "DXing".

  13. Re:Same frequencies? by damiangerous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "real story" would be the article. Which contains the answers to every single one of your questions.

  14. FCC regs... by TheHawke · · Score: 3, Informative

    Under FCC regulations, any interference with official bands (IE, police, fire, ambulance) by a TV station is considered illegal by law and MUST immediately stop of be fined per day per channel that experiences the interference.
    This occurred with one cable TV station over in one town that i stayed in. They had brought up another channel into their lineup using AINCENT cable equipment that generated a harmonic with the City police's repeater and caused massive interference with their communications. The city immediately moved and filed a complaint with the FCC on this and the Gov't submitted a court order stating that the cable company shut down ALL services until this issue was cleared up. The channel was immediately shut down and the station was shifted to another channel that was more clearer and did not cause any further problems.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  15. Re:"Insert Joisey-joke here. " -- NOT FUNNY by rhysweatherley · · Score: 4, Funny
    How about if I made some FAT jokes ...

    Make all the jokes you like about File Allocation Tables. See if we care. This is a Microsoft-bashing site after all.

  16. Re:Digital TV by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I have nothing against DTV/HDTV.
    I did get the impression that it is being forced down our collecive throats since it has not been adapted quickly enough by the market.

    I feel that the regulations are being applied to the *wrong* industry. Wouldn't it be much better to mandate that all vehicles must be electrical or hybrid by 2007? As much as I like my car, I can see the advantage of such law. but TV phase out? for what? for Hollywood quality content that they have been withholding? :)

  17. Re:Same frequencies? by MisterFancypants · · Score: 5, Funny

    The links go to articles? Fascinating!

  18. Pumping gas by spineboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why bother, I can have someone do it for me (in the freezing snow, rain, spiners, etc), it keeps my hands from smelling and it's cheaper than most of the country.

    Do you cook your own hamburgers/steaks when you go out and eat? - no someone doe sit for you.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  19. Minor corrections... by KC7GR · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the /. article header...

    "The article seems to suggest that as more TV stations go digital, more small-town police radio will be affected, as the digital signal is significantly stronger than analog..."

    Actually, the type of modulation (digital or analog) has little to do with the signal "strength" (which is a function of transmitter power output, transmission line losses, and antenna design and orientation).

    Now, with that said, digital modulation, being much closer to a square wave than an analog voice signal, is much richer in HARMONICS than said analog signal.

    I've lost count of how many times I've heard interference from digital paging transmitters bleeding into ham radio repeaters. The harmonics from the digital modulation mix with the transmitter's carrier, and that of whatever other transmitters happen to be on the same hilltop, and close to the same frequency range. It sounds awful, and it looks even worse on a spectrum analyzer screen.

    The problem may be correctable through (as others have pointed out) better receiver design, in terms of filtering, and good installation practices being followed where the transmitter and antenna system are concerned. Good filtering and modulation techniques at the transmitter end won't do any harm either.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Minor corrections... by mesocyclone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now, with that said, digital modulation, being much closer to a square wave than an analog voice signal, is much richer in HARMONICS than said analog signal.

      This is utter and total nonsense. The modulated RF signal is harmonic and spectrally in accordance by regulation. Digital modulation doesn't cause carrier harmonics (the two are unrelated) and the harmonics from the square wave digital (which cause sidebands or wider bandwidth depending on mode) are of course attenuated at base band before modulation is applied and/or filtered out.

      After all, any energy wasted in "harmonics" is energy that is not available to carry information to the receiver. Digital modem designers (RF or otherwise) have known about this for approximately forever.

      I've lost count of how many times I've heard interference from digital paging transmitters bleeding into ham radio repeaters. The harmonics from the digital modulation mix with the transmitter's carrier, and that of whatever other transmitters happen to be on the same hilltop, and close to the same frequency range. It sounds awful, and it looks even worse on a spectrum analyzer screen.

      Again, this has nothing to do with the DIGITAL nature of the transmitters. Intermodulation is usually not a result of harmonics from the transmitter, but rather harmonics generated in your own receiver - totally independent of modulation mode. And yes, it does look ugly on a spectrum analyzer - whether it is digital or analog.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  20. Insert Joisey-joke here. by evilviper · · Score: 5, Funny
    Insert Joisey-joke here.


    Geena Davis: "Easy, sport. I got myself out of Beirut once, I think I can get out of New Jersey."

    Sam Jackson: "Yeah, well don't be so sure. Others have tried and failed... The entire population, in fact."

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. Re:Ok, that's it, I am suing by MajroMax · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Slashdot, new for nerds, stuff that matters"

    First there was the pumpkin PC, then the Dune book, and now a story that takes pertains only to NJ. I am officially suing slashdot for breach of contract.

    You must be new here.

    --
    "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
  22. Re:Same frequencies? by mobets · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, our 'friends' at the FCC have been selling Digital TV channel 20 to police stations. The city bought those frequencies in '98. or maybe they trurned a band used for police into channel 20. Either way, they should have seen this comming. My question is what they were planning to do when Digital TV becomes more common.

    --

    It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  23. Won't affect small towns very badly by LinuxOnHal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Digital television won't affect small towns very badly. Many small towns are still on the 460 mHz band, rather than the higher bands that Digital TV will use. Remember, the FCC is clearing out the lower broadcast bands and moving everything up into the UHF and Microwave bands, where police don't do a whole lot of talking.

    --
    Trying is the First Step to Failing --Homer Simpson
  24. Allocations by rfg · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of innacurate information has been passed around here.

    UHF communication frequencies generally go from 450-470 mHz and were fully populated years ago. What the FCC did is to allocate certain UHF TV channels to communications, in the 470-512 range; ie TV channels (not cable channels) 14-20 for communications use in certain areas. The areas in question are laid out in a plan, so that in some areas a certain channel is used for TV and and in some areas that same channel is used for communications.

    This came about because in a given area you cannot have adjacent TV channels used by TV or they interfere with each other. Also, UHF TV was never really popular with broadcasters and many channels were loped off on the upper end (ch 70-88 as I recall).

    Thus it is perfectly in accordance with the FCC plan to have Channel 20 allocated to TV in Boston and to communications in Southern New Jersy. Up to now, however, channel 20 was never used in Boston, it was empty and now has been allocated to digital TV.

    Analog TV stations must convert to digital by a certain date (2006, but keeps slipping....). During the interim period, the station may transmit Analog on its present channel, and digital on the new channel. This is precisely what WCVB is doing. Eventually the station will be strictly digital on Channel 20 and the Analog VHF transmission will terminate.

    East coast atlantic tropospheric ducting is common and radio hams and others are well aware of it; I am surprised the FCC did not take this into account when they allocated the channels. If I had to speculate, I would say that the FCC will require WCVB to reduce power, use a directional antenna or change channels - which may be tricky. This will be fertile ground for hordes of lawyers.

  25. Re:Just desserts by r2ravens · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, without New Jersey we wouldn't have...uhhh...hmmm...

    A place to put our toxic waste?

    But seriously folks...

    Jon Bon Jovi? Paul Simon? Allen Ginsburg? Jack Nicholson? Joe Piscopo? Kevin Spacey? Frank Sinatra? Meryl Streep? Ray Liotta? Michael Douglas? John Travolta? Elizabeth Shue (hubba hubba)? Jerry Lewis (ok, we could do without him...)

    Thomas Edison? Irving Langmuir (Incandescent lamp)? Edmund Germer (Flourescent Lamp)? Lloyd Conover (Tetracycline)? James Hillier (Electron Microscope)? Donald Fletcher Holmes (Polyurethane)? Roy Plunkett (Teflon)? Lewis Sarett (Cortisone)? Vladimir Kosma Zworykin (Cathode-Ray Tube)?

    First college football game (Rutger v. Princeton, 1869)? First organized baseball game? First pro basketball game?

    Campbell's soup? Cranberry Sauce? Salt water taffy?

    Electric guitar (Les Paul, 1940)? First submarine (1878)? First ferry (between Hoboken and Manhattan, 1811)? First brewery (Hoboken, 1642)?

    No, I am not a Jerseyite. I live in Arizona and have never been to New Jersey. (Ain't the web wonderful? It's always good to learn new things - especially at my advanced age.) Of course, none of these things is enough to motivate me to vist. :)

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
  26. The joys of required digital tuners and broadcast by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is actually an issue the other way as well.

    As the FCC forces digital broadcast and begins to sell off the UHF and VHF ranges for communications equipment....what will happen if a TV station is still broadcasting.

    For instance, in San Diego the local Fox affiliate actually has their broadcast tower in Mexico (they can get a permit for a stronger signal there). If a nationwide carrier developes communications equipment uses that part of the spectrum...their equipment won't work in San Diego.

    How will the FCC control 'foreign' signals?

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  27. Re:Digital TV by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's being forced on us because people are inherently dumb. People hate change (of just about any type) & this has hurt certain things. DTV/HDTV being one of them, other countries have something like it already (Japan) or are working on it (Europe & Australia).

    I'm biased on the whole issue because I own an HDTV. HDTV is simly amazing. I've seen people watch an HDTV loop of various locations of the country for hours & this was a 10 minute loop (so it repeated for ~10 times before they could pull themselves away). It's also great for gaming as it lets games from a console system rival the quality of PC games, of course the only system designed to output in HD is the xbox but the next generation of consoles will most likely all support it...

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  28. Albany - Adelaide in one low-watt VHF hop by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Interesting
    An Amateur friend in Albany [detailed PDF, 300kB] [grotty GIF, 29kB] [GIF of context, 9kB] was listening with half an ear one day while doing other stuff, when he suddenly realised that he was overhearing local traffic in Adelaide. So he wound his 1KW linear amp down to (IIRC) 4W, clicked on and said `Hi, such-and-such', naming one of the participants instead of using a callsign. He ID'd later in the conversation, and there were some thuds of dropping jaws when he did.

    The duct covered roughly 1600km LOS on a few watts. I don't know if that's a record, but it certainly impressed me.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  29. I would RTFA, but... by wowbagger · · Score: 3

    I would RTFA, but the link is broken.

    However, I find this somewhat surprising. Most police band radios operate in the 800MHz trunking band, which is reserved just for that purpose.

    I didn't think the FCC was allowing digital TV anywhere near those frequencies - in fact that is why UHF TV channels 68 and up (IIRC) were taken out of service - to make room for the public service trunking band.

    I would guess that what probably happened was that the station in question was mixing with another signal, and spattering into the police band.

    In all probability, the cops didn't hear what the station was transmitting - Jersey is using Motorola Astro trunking, perhaps even digital mode, so the cops' radios would simply have said "this isn't the signal I was looking for. Move along."

    Does anyone have a link to a cache?

  30. Re:Digital TV by gadget_ts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is being shoved down our collective throats! I have nothing against technology but there is something definitely amiss with this issue. HDTV and Digital Radio is not worth the price that we will have to pay and I am not just talking about money. Why is this such a priority for the FCC? There has to be money involved.... lots of money and we are the pawns. KEEP IN MIND... that this will edge out low-cost independent broadcasting because of the way the FCC has chosen to implement it. I am as tech hungry as the anyone but a B&W, 5" screen, analog TV for much of my watching needs is just fine. When HDTV if fully implemented I will no longer be able to use it. Digital braodcasting hands over control to the handful of huge media companies. They can control copying (recording), etc..... We have been sucked into DVD's. Which are nice but it controls copying of the media. We were sold on the digtial picture and sound but in reality it has giving the media companies control over copying. Something is wrong here folks. We should all step back and look very carefully at what we are giving up for a pretty picture. Is it worth it?