Slashdot Mirror


Is Remote Keyless Entry Any Safer Than It Used to Be?

Clue4All asks: "The time has come for me to start looking for a new car to buy after the winter snows have come and gone. Every car I'm interested in seems to come standard with Remote Keyless Entry with all their models. Has this technology become safer since I last bought a car? I remember seeing a news story years ago about burglars receiving signals used to open garage doors, and Google turned up articles like this from a few years ago. Apparently, some keyless entry systems now use "code hopping," which changes the signal after each use, making copying the signals pretty hard. I've requested information from a few car companies as to whether they employ such technology, what are your findings? Are these safe? I ask because I live in an apartment complex, not that I'd worry about anyone living around me doing something like this, but the thought is still there."

67 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Try asking by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, ask the dealer. If the dealer doesn't know, make them find out or call the manufacturer. Someone should be able to tell you what type of security they utilize.

    If they wanted to get into your car, which do you think they are going to do: Spend the time/money on a code grabber and wait for you to drive up, park, and get your code...or just break your window...or try the car next to yours that is unlocked.

    1. Re:Try asking by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2
      Whatever you do don't trust anyone involved with actually selling you the car, dealer, mechanic or manufacturar. A recent BBC watchdog program had a story on new volkswagens wich can be easily openend with a special tool. (It opens all the electric windows making access for theft from the car extremely easy. without the mess of having to break a window) They weren't to clear on the details of the tool, prob not to give anyone ideas, but they demonstrated it and several dealers said they knew about it on hidden camera.

      The point is that the official line is that nothing was wrong with the cars and that they had no information on it. Car manufacturars are well known for lying about their products. There are laws concerning roadsafety, but anti-theft is a wasteland.

      As for the post this is commented to. The other methods draw attentention. If they have youre code then to the rest of the world, and for that matter youre security system they look like the owners. Even dutch police agents are suspicious about a car with a broken window driving around.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  2. Not relevant by Kj0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, to answer your question: remote keyless entry has become a lot safer in the last years.

    However, this is not so relevant. When people want to steal your car, they will steal it. No anti-theft system is completely safe. Even when it is impossible to open your car, they will simply wait for you to open it. This means that the best solution is to discourage people from stealing your car. Buy a model that is not too attractive. Don't leave your car in unsafe neighbourhoods.

    One last suggestion: if someone shows up and threatens you, just give him the keys. Your life is worth much more than your car.

    1. Re:Not relevant by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Funny

      HEHE my father is a retired locksmith, that was his general advice to anyone who stated that their car was frequently broken into and or stolen. The responce was always in the line of that they were too good for a cheap looking car.

    2. Re:Not relevant by leviramsey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Buy a model that is not too attractive

      Of course, buying a run-of-the mill car is no guarantee. There is a class of thief who specializes in stealing Camrys, Accords, Chevy Malibus, and other similarly unattractive cars that no one would buy unless forced to. There are a couple of reasons for the thief to specialize in these:

      • Many on the road. If someone reports a green Camry stolen, it's not like you can really put the cops on alert for such a vehicle.
      • Large market for parts. This thief will quickly sell the car to a chop shop which likes the idea that, based on the number of cars out there, somebody will be willing to buy a hugely discounted part for their car.
    3. Re:Not relevant by kiwimate · · Score: 3, Informative

      True. I used to own a white Mazda Familia wagon, fairly anonymous, no extras at all except for air conditioning. I bought it because it was ideal for my needs at the time (low mileage, only a couple of years old, excellent condition, and I needed the luggage capacity of a wagon). It was stolen one night (Christmas Day, actually), and the police found it a couple of weeks later. They told me that from evidence found in the car it was apparent it had been used in a couple of jewellery store burglaries, and that meant they would've picked my car precisely because it was anonymous. So, not the sort of vehicle to rate a second glance from the kids who want a joy-ride, but ideal for thief transit to be dumped later on -- neither flashy nor ratty enough to draw attention.

    4. Re:Not relevant by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      This means that the best solution is to discourage people from stealing your car. Buy a model that is not too attractive. Don't leave your car in unsafe neighbourhoods.

      And buy a steering wheel lock, like the Club. I use one even though I have a car alarm, on the principle it's a fairly visible extra deterrent which will mean more work for the thief. A professional who really wants my car will go for it anyway, but I'm more concerned about discouraging the casual thief.

    5. Re:Not relevant by qengho · · Score: 4, Informative

      buy a steering wheel lock, like the Club

      Those are completely useless. Yeah, they're case-hardened steel, but your steering wheel isn't. Thieves simply cut a chunk out of the wheel and remove the club.

    6. Re:Not relevant by AndrewRUK · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's already patented in the USA, UK, Europe-wide and is on sale in USA and Britain.
      You can't patent things which other people have (well, you shouldn't be able to, anyway.)

    7. Re:Not relevant by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Ah! the vigor of stupidity... The extatic feeling of a loaded gun in your hand... the certainty of the lack of value in the lifes of others...

      You would make a great suicide bomber, my boy!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    8. Re:Not relevant by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      Thieves simply cut a chunk out of the wheel and remove the club.

      That tends to hurt the resale value a bit.

      Over here in the UK, we have a product called 'Disclock' (or something) which is a big hardened steel disk, which completely covers your steering wheel, locking all around it.

      My uncle put one on his hours-old new car... then found he'd given in the keys when he part-exchanged his old car. It took well over an hour to hacksaw it off.

      So, there are some decent products out there.

      Cheers,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    9. Re:Not relevant by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      It's hard to avoid unsafe neighborhoods if you happen to LIVE in one!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  3. Saturns have it by Samus · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife's Saturn is a 97 and it uses code hopping. In fact the car gets pissed off if you only use the key to open the door if the alarm has been armed.

    --
    In Republican America phones tap you.
    1. Re:Saturns have it by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an 1997 Integra and it will let you use the key to open the driver's door after locking with the remote, but heaven help you if you try the trunk, or unlock all the doors from the inside after using only the key. Also, it seems to unlock all 4 doors even though it's only supposed to open the driver's door if you press it once.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  4. Ask for battery time while you're at it. by TripleA · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Don't forget to ask for battery time when you are at it. If the batteries run out quick, you will get very frustrated.

    1. Re:Ask for battery time while you're at it. by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      I wondered about this and BMWs... it turns out that they have a rechargable battery of some sort (maybe a supercap, but I'm not sure - just hope it's long life) that charges while the key is in the ignition. It says if you have a key that you don't use, charge it on a long drive about once a year. I imagine other manufacturers have a similar technique.

    2. Re:Ask for battery time while you're at it. by afidel · · Score: 2

      Just thought of a cool idea but I'm too lazy to patent it so anyone who wants it feel free. To greatly extend the battery life of small devices with buttons simply have the button push a pizoelectric generator as well as the trigger switch. This way a large part of the energy can be obtained from the user initiating the action.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  5. Some do...but most don't... by OneFix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Anything installed from the factory is bound to be the cheapest possible component. AudioVox makes alot of these factory units (the car companies don't actually make their own car alarms)...But it depends on what kind of alarm is being installed...if it's sold for under $40k, most likely it doesn't have code hopping...so do what I did and buy a vehicle without an alarm and simply have a good one installed by a local shop that warantees their service (no crap from Wal-Mart or Best Buy).

    It's true that modern security system installation is nothing but a connection kit...some of em don't even have to drill holes...but they can still skrew it up if they don't know what they're doing...

    In most cases you're talking about $99 for a factory installed alarm. And a good unit from Viper (500ESP+) that will have the code hopping feature is gonna cost you at least $300. The other advantages of a GOOD alarm system is that you can install modules like power window/sunroof and remote start (for automatics).

    Anyhow, it's not really smart to rely on those factory alarms for security.

    1. Re:Some do...but most don't... by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      In most cases you're talking about $99 for a factory installed alarm. And a good unit from Viper (500ESP+) that will have the code hopping feature is gonna cost you at least $300. The other advantages of a GOOD alarm system is that you can install modules like power window/sunroof and remote start (for automatics).

      You're full of it. Code hopping is probably cheaper to implement these days than non. There are chipsets (Microchip's HCS series, for example) which do all the hard work for you. My CDN$90 (US$40) remote starter uses code hopping, for Christ's sake.

  6. Multiple Remotes? by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a question I've never seen addressed:

    What if you have multiple remotes?

    If, for example, you've got two cars, each with their own garage door opener remote, and the remote uses code hopping, how does the 2nd remote know what code to use after the last time the 1st remote was used?

    (obviously, it can't "know," which is the problem).

    Do these things use some kind of challenge/response system, with a different challenge each time?

    Or are you simply stuck with only being able to use one remote for any given device? (door, car, etc.)

    1. Re:Multiple Remotes? by erlenic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It probably has different sets of codes for each remote. So remote #1 opens the door on 5, then the remote and door switch to 8 for the next time. At the same time, the door and remote #2 are expecting to use code 13 between the two of them.

    2. Re:Multiple Remotes? by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 5, Informative

      What if you have multiple remotes?

      I read some technical literature on code-hopping remotes- you can have multiple remotes and so forth. A code hopping remote is a one-way device- it only transmits, and it transmits a different code each time you press the button. The reciever knows what the code was the last time you pressed the button, so it knows what the next code should be (they use very, very long pseudo-random sequences).

      So what happens if you press the remote when you're too far away, or your 3 year old finds it in the car and presses it merrily for a few miles until he gets bored? If the current code is code N, the next to be transmitted is code N+1, and the next that the reciever will key on will be N+1 to some range of N+X where X is pretty large, but still far smaller than Y, the total number of different codes.

      In addition to keying on something in the next group of X codes, another safeguard thats used is to key on two successive remote-keys- lets say my transmitter is out of sequence, say by A - the reciever is looking for a code between N+1 and N+X- it recieves the code N+A (where N+1N+AN+X) It won't key on that, but if the next code it recieves is N+A+1, it knows that it got the right sequence, and will only open after the next keypress.

      For multiple remotes, it adds a separate domain to key upon(say, Y to Y+N)- slightly less secure, but of course the more keys there are for any door, the less secure it is.

    3. Re:Multiple Remotes? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      It probably has different sets of codes for each remote.

      A perfectly reasonable and extremely obvious solution. So, naturally, I missed it. :)

      Though this doesn't address what happens when a transmission gets missed (from interference or distance), but another reply covered that one pretty well...

    4. Re:Multiple Remotes? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Well, this probably isn't how they do it, but you could always do it the same was as this device (keep a clock and compute a unique hash based on the time).

    5. Re:Multiple Remotes? by gorillasoft · · Score: 2

      They do allow for multiple remotes. My garage door opener, which uses the same technology, will allow for up to seven remotes. When you get a new remote, you must sync it with the opener unit before it will work by pressing button combinations on both the opener and the remote. Car alarms often work in a similar fashion.

    6. Re:Multiple Remotes? by tzanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Though this doesn't address what happens when a transmission gets missed (from interference or distance), but another reply covered that one pretty well...

      It looks for codes that are n codes away from the next desired, as well. So if you hit the button n+1 times away from the receiver, you're buggered unless you can reset them both to code 0, but I can personally attest to this working. (I have a button-happy 18-month-old son).

  7. The question is... by joto · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The question is: "What does your insurance company say?" Because in the end, people will find a way to steal your car if they want to.

    Secondly, I doubt anything new could be much more unsafe than a mechanical key system. It takes me about 5 minutes to get into an older car, and a professional burglar will probably be driving it away faster than it takes you to find the right key.

    If you have an alarm, again it will take me approximately 5 minutes to disable (about 7 seconds to disable the horn), and the professional burglar will probably do it a lot faster (since he has done it so many times before, and also because he doesn't worry too much about electrical insulation, etc...)

    If you are really worried about people using a programmable IR remote to steal your car, you should shift the area of worry. I'll be happy to line up 20 people in less than half-an-hour who could easily steal your car without such advanced equipment.

    Here's what you really should be worried about: Is my keyless system expensive enough for someone to steal it? Will someone steal my alarm? Is my car-stereo visible outside, and expensive enough to be worth the trouble? Do I usually keep my wallet in the front seat? Is my car much more expensive than my neighbours or workmates? Etc...

    In the end, it turns out insurance companies have done most of this thinking already, so you could just ask them.

    1. Re:The question is... by karnal · · Score: 2

      I own a GM car equipped with this feature. AFAIK, there are only 7 possible resistor combinations (per the manual for the car, and per the sears key shop -- when I needed to get a key made, they measured the resistance through the "chip" and cut another key with the same "chip" in it...)

      So there's not much to that. The only issue is, is if you try to start the car with the wrong value, it will disable the car for 5 minutes. So, you could steal the car on the first shot, or the max time would be 35 minutes, start to finish.... detering a thief for even 5 minutes, though, would probably work.

      And, oh yes, it's also a pain when the car doesn't recognize your key (happened to me once...) because, as you know, keys have a pretty rough life. Keeping the "contacts" on the pellet clean isn't really a thought for me all the time....

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:The question is... by Zelet · · Score: 2

      Is my keyless system expensive enough for someone to steal it? Will someone steal my alarm? Is my car-stereo visible outside, and expensive enough to be worth the trouble? Do I usually keep my wallet in the front seat? Is my car much more expensive than my neighbors or workmates? Etc...

      My 1992 Saturn was stolen about 3 months ago. There was a 2001 Jeep Grand Cherokee with leather sitting next to it. The cops said they picked my car because it had no alarm system and so it was easier to steal.

      Buy the alarm that will give YOU the best peace of mind. That is the true value of an alarm system.

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    3. Re:The question is... by afidel · · Score: 2

      why the fark did they use resistance as the protection mechanism, use a cryptographic handshake, it's so cheap to do that our corporate access badges do it through reflective rf. smart chips cost less than a buck a piece, eproms that can be burnt to the key that matches a car would cost pennies and the dealership then gets to make $ when you lose a key. Reliability my arse, GM wanted to save pennies per key and it makes your 10-80K investment less secure, whoopie.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  8. Security through obscurity by Sherloqq · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although I usually do not recommend this approach, consider obtaining security through obscurity.

    Factory-installed keyless entry / remote starter systems all come from the same company, so if you get a Dodge Intrepid with an installed system, it will be identical to every other Dodge Intrepid's system. If you're afraid of someone scanning the remote's codes to gain access to your car, consider getting an aftermarket system. They're abundant in today's DYI market, and every automotive store carries a few different brands. Most of them are likely to have varying circuitry, varying frequencies, varying communication protocols, which make it that much harder and impractical for a would-be thief to get a scanner for (instead, get a scanner that caters to a wider "audience", if you will).

    Naturally, a thief bent on stealing your car might get frustrated with not being able to crack your remote's code, perhaps to the point of using a jimmy and scratching the precious paint job, or even using a blunt object and simply breaking the glass. But at least your car will still be there :)

    Personally, I use a remote system from ICDynamics. It gives me remote start, keyless entry and trunk release options, and that's good enough for me. Gets good range, too (over 300ft), so I can start my car up from the comfort of my home on days like today (a few degrees below freezing).

    No, I do not work for them :) I'm just a happy customer.

    --
    Have EVDO, will travel.
    1. Re:Security through obscurity by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Although I usually do not recommend this approach, consider obtaining security through obscurity.

      Heh, for some reason I thought you were going to suggest taking off the Dodge logos and replacing them with Chevy logos.

      If you're afraid of someone scanning the remote's codes to gain access to your car, consider getting an aftermarket system.

      Unless you plan on turning off the beep and/or the light flash when you unlock your car this doesn't seem like a very useful plan. Most thieves using this method will just stand in the middle of the parking lot and hit the button. I.E. they're probably not going to be targetting a single car.

    2. Re:Security through obscurity by Sherloqq · · Score: 2

      Most thieves using this method will just stand in the middle of the parking lot and hit the button. I.E. they're probably not going to be targetting a single car.

      Exactly. If they have a 31337 h4x0r3d remote for scanning / opening doors to Fords/Mercurys/Lincolns (all manufactured by the same company), only the Fords, Mercurys and Lincolns will unlock their doors. Given the choice of an unlocked Ford vs. a still-locked Pontiac with a remote operating on a different (not-apparently-obbious-since-it's-aftermarket) frequency, the thief will prolly go for the Ford. At first. Then he'll smash the Pontiac's window, because the driver left their purse/wallet/portable cd player/radar detector/cb radio in the car.

      Damn. I gotta take out the cb radio out of my car.

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    3. Re:Security through obscurity by Sherloqq · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, my vehicle is a 1986 GMC Safari van with bad paint, several dents, and 205,000 miles, so maybe not worth that much effort. Though I'd still be pissed if someone took it.

      Wanna know something? Depending on where you live, your van might get stolen anyway -- not for parts, not for a joy ride, but for a drug dealer's use. Drug dealers usually don't meddle in the business of stealing cars, so they hire "professionals" to do their job for them -- meaning they have to pay for the vehicle and the effort. Since a vehicle will be taken away by police if it was used in the process of selling drugs, drug dealers 1) don't want to lose too much money; 2) want a non-descript, inconspicuous vehicle to begin with anyway, so they ask for older, less expensive vehicles.

      Depending on where you live, your van may not be as safe as you'd like it to be :)

      I've lived just outside of West Philly for several years. I know.

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
  9. As a random aside... by Zapman · · Score: 2

    Economically, you'll save a lot of money if you buy a car at this time of year (at least in the US). Car sales are much lower in the November/December timeframe, and prices are lower to try and drive up sales. Dealers also have the incentive to clear their lots of the previous model year for the new one.

    Granted, at least in the Northern US, there are good reasons to not buy a car just before winter begins (salt on the roads (due to snow) rusting out a new frame being the main one)

    --
    Zapman
    1. Re:As a random aside... by cduffy · · Score: 2

      Buying a used car is as intelligent as buying American. You're taking your chances, and more often than not it's a FUCKING STUPID IDEA.

      Well, that's why one takes steps to mitigate risk. That means inspecting the car carefully (or having a mechanically inclined friend do it for you) and researching its history. Some car owners keep documents of every single oil change and part replacement, so a used car need not be an unknown quantity if selected with care.

      Anyhow, buying a 2003 model rather than an unsold 2002 is still, economically speaking, stupid -- there's not much reason in favor, and a whole lot more expense.

      - the very happy driver of a $500 1992 VW Jetta

  10. Re:Some do...but most don't...RTFM! by blastedtokyo · · Score: 4, Informative
    Any proof to back up what you say? I opened up my $17K 1997 Subaru Outback Sport remote to find code hopping in it.

    Actually, I felt kinda dumb when I opened the manual and it described how the code hopping work and what the chances are that you would hit another keyless remote with the exact same signature.

    I've seen the same description in other japanese autos manuals and remotes. (haven't played with the american domestics for a while though)

  11. Nope. by DeLabarre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not only is the remote keyless entry unsafe, but driving cars is inherently unsafe. You could be struck and killed. Stay off the roads. Hide in your basement. Wear tinfoil.

    --

    In the Star Trek evil Mirror Universe, virtuoso cellist Yo-Yo Ma is gangsta hiphop star DJ Yo Ma-Ma.

  12. Re:Not worried? by Clue4All · · Score: 2

    Not really, most of the people that live in my apartment complex are older, seemingly non-technical folks. I'd be more worried about some dipshit kid buying a $20 device off Ebay and leaving it on his porch for a morning to record the signals that are sent out to cars 10 feet away. Just because there are many easier ways to break into a car doesn't mean I want someone knowing the unchanging signal that unlocks my car, just like there are a lot easier ways to break into a house than finding the spare key, but I'm not going to broadcast to the world where it is.

    --

    Is your browser retarded?
  13. Remote Keyless Entry is Convenience, not Security by mr_teem · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Remote Keyless Entry systems that automobile manufacturers install as standard equipment are there for convenience not for any added security over and above the key/ignition electromechanical interlocks and the standard alarm systems. Those impediments and deterrents to theft would be there regardless of the little remote dongle. (As several others have pointed out, a thief is going to get your car if he wants it bad enough.)

    Frankly, my RKE dongle can be a pain in the ass. Depending on how it happens to twist in my pocket against the rest of the keychain, I can set off the panic button by turning just the right way.

    --
    --- "It annoyed me, so I fixed it." -- Tom's First Principle of Engineering
  14. Weakest Link by GoRK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look, as everybody else has said, if someone's going to steal your car, they're going to steal it. If they're going to break into it, they're going to break into it.

    To get into the car, the thief has several options: Intercept, record and duplicate the keyless entry's signal; jimmy the door lock by yanking the lock wire or an interior switch (very hard on most new cars, but still possible on a great many); go after the keyed lock on the door itself with a pick/what have you; or break the window. Anyway, the point is that even if the thief has all the gear to get into your car via the keyless entry system, it's not going to be very effective to use versus any of the other methods. It's the same with robbing houses. Too many people leave the door between the garage and the house unlocked, and the garage doors operate on a (generally much less secure than car) wireless RF remote. ... But you don't see burglers breaking into houses via the garage door very often. It's just easier for them to crowbar through the back door or find a house with an open window.

    Anyway, what it boiled down to for me was that:
    1) pushing a button to unlock the car is a hell of a lot quicker/easier than turning a key.
    2) I am an idiot and forget where I parked a lot. I can make the car beep at me, and it helps.
    3) Having a car alarm of some sort brings down my car insurance a lot... i guess mainly because of my age and the car i drive .. but no matter what it will usually knock your rate down a little bit.

    So anyway, I'd say go for it, but make sure that the system has some sort of alarm feature such as a glass break mic or ignition cutoff that would classify it as a tiny bit more than a remote lock/unlock button, or it's not going to help you with your insurance.

    ~GoRK

    1. Re:Weakest Link by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Look, as everybody else has said, if someone's going to steal your car, they're going to steal it. If they're going to break into it, they're going to break into it.

      Yeah, and it was just as untrue then as it is now. Obviously a thief who's intent on stealing your car could do it, but most thieves are not that stubborn. If the thief presses a button and the car door opens and the car turns on, you're much more likely to have your car stolen.

      Having a car alarm of some sort brings down my car insurance a lot... i guess mainly because of my age and the car i drive

      I could be wrong, but intuition suggests that your age has nothing to do with the discount for having a car alarm, since it would lower your comprehensive rather than your liability/collision. But maybe the theory is that young people park in more dangerous locations... Possible I guess.

    2. Re:Weakest Link by WatertonMan · · Score: 2
      Look, as everybody else has said, if someone's going to steal your car, they're going to steal it. If they're going to break into it, they're going to break into it.

      That's what I say. That's why I have my truck rigged with C4 tied to the custom made car alarm based off an old 486 portable computer motherboard. It plays a recorded MP3 of me laughing and then BOOM.

      Admittedly I'm a little worried about liability. But I figure I'll just claim that it was some assassin trying to rig my car to explode.

  15. While your at it by rerunn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Alot of the makers now use imobilizer chips in their keys. Without this embedded chip, the car wont start even if the key matches.

    Great idea, until you want another key made. Mr Keyman at your local mall will happilly grind you a matching key without the chip thus making the 4 bucks you just spent useful for only opening the doors. Now the kicker -- you need to go to the dealer to get a real key and get reamed in the ass for at least 50 bucks.

    If your getting a new car, try to get the dealer to throw in a extra key or two.

    good luck.

  16. Re:Remote Keyless Entry is Convenience, not Securi by Clue4All · · Score: 2

    The Remote Keyless Entry systems that automobile manufacturers install as standard equipment are there for convenience not for any added security over and above the key/ignition electromechanical interlocks and the standard alarm systems.

    Of course. My question was in no way related to other security devices of the vehicle, solely if using such a device on a fixed frequency was going to INCREASE security risks (it seems like wireless always is). But I guess the discussion goes whichever way it wants, no big deal.

    --

    Is your browser retarded?
  17. I wouldn't worry. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    Realistically, you are not going to see any increased security risk with a keyless entry system.

    There are probaly a couple of hundred different codes transmitted over frequencies that will vary from car to car. I used to drive a very common car (a Ford Explorer) and never ran into a situation where my keyless remote opened up doors on another car.

    Contrast this to keys. There are usually only about 15 different key combinations per model for many cars. To combat the problem of theives getting their hands on the keys to steal the car, most manufacturers have added an RFID token to car keys. If you start to open a door with a copied key, the ignition is disabled.

    I suppose if you knew all the different frequencies used by the keyless transmitters, you could sit in busy parking lots and gather the lock and unlock codes. You still would not have the ignition key or the RFID of the igniton key.

    But you would need to have alot of money to build the equipment, a good background in electronics, and a smart brain in your head. (Traits generally not carried by car theives) Who would go to all of this trouble to steal a stereo?? Especially when you can gain phyiscal access to the car in less than 45 seconds w/o any technical stuff!

    Also, as a side note, large apartment complexes are wonderlands for thieves of all sorts. A transient population with relatively high income equals alot of unreported petty crime. Those cheap sliding glass doors make entry into the house trivial.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  18. Go "old school"? by cr0sh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As others have mentioned, locks and alarms of any kind exist only to keep honest people honest. A true thief is not going to care.

    With that said, you might try doing the smart thing - don't buy a car someone would want to steal. Remember, a vehicle is simply a way to get you and your stuff from point A to point B - the minute the vehicle seems like something that gives you an "image", you are lost. That isn't to say that you need to get a clunker or something, just don't buy for image. Furthermore, the best advice I was ever given as a kid was "Buy a vehicle that will for for you, instead of one where you work for it". My vehicle is a small pickup - should I lose my job as a programmer, I still have a vehicle I could (in theory) load up some lawn equipment in and do some yard work for cash until I get back on my feet, or deliver newspapers, or phone books, or haul trash, or throw wire boxes in and install network cabling, etc - hard to do that with another vehicle, but maybe your needs or work are different.

    One note: buying a used car may be a better thing - my small truck is pre-1997, which I think is the year they went to the ODB-II system. This is the "On Board Diagnostic" system used by the vehicle's engine computer - it also reports back things typically using a reader. Here is the clincher - on ODB-I systems, you can read the codes yourself, most of the time doing nothing more than stick a jumper in a plug and watching a blinking light - other times by keying the starter switch in a certain pattern and watching the engine light blink. ODB-II systems require you to buy a reader, and unless you buy an expensive reader, you can only read one model vehicle at a time. Still, you have to spend some bucks for the reader. Another thing is that on ODB-II systems when you go get smog checked, if they are using the system, they simply plug in, and tell you if you pass or not. My wife recently had this done on her 1997 Neon, and she passed, but if she hadn't, the paper wouldn't have said where the issue was, and we would have probably had to take it to a mechanic to get it fixed - at least when you can see what emmisions are out of whack, you have an idea where to start (ie, O2 sensor, etc). Don't even get me started on ODB-III (which seems near Orwellian in scope).

    Another thing would be to see if they will eliminate these "mandatory" systems that simply add to the cost of a new car and take it off the price. Save a little money.

    Finally, instead of an expensive system, add an "old school" system - a second switch. Wire it inline with the starter switch. If you want, you can wire up a high-current contact relay in the system instead, and hook that up to the relay in the starter, so that current has to pass through both set of contacts in order for the starter to turn over. Hide the switch somewhere in the automobile where a thief typically won't look - under the dash is bad, but in the glove box, a cubby hole, under the seat, in the trunk - all good spots. Add a well visible blinking red LED to complete the system. Total cost in parts will be a few bucks, but would probably frustrate the hell out of a potential thief (of course, it might tick him off so bad that he destroys the interior of the car or something, and it wouldn't stop him from stealing the radio or anything - which is a good reason to keep the factory radio).

    Ok, you may not like any of my answers, but my point still stands - a vehicle is just something to get you and your stuff from point A to point B. Whatever you do, don't get into the "buy a new car every three years" cycle - this is just a waste. Pay off your car, keep up its maintenance, and the thing should last you a looong time - my truck currently 8 years old, and has 115,000 miles on it - the only thing I am needing replacement on is a new fan belt and new tires, which will probably happen sometime this winter. I replace the oil and filter on it every 3000 miles (btw, get a "permanent" air-filter as soon as you buy the car - it will cost more, but in the long run you will save money on air-filter replacements after about 8-10 oil changes), replace the shocks when needed, flush the tranny and radiator every now-and-then, change the spark plugs and wires as needed, belts, hoses, diff gear oil (nasty stuff) - every 60,000 miles get the timing belt/chain looked at and replaced if needed (timing chains can go longer in between checks - see your manual - but they still need to be looked after). If you treat everything right, there is no reason your car shouldn't last for 200,000 miles or more.

    Myself, I plan on keeping my truck until the engine dies - then if the engine dies, I might look into getting a new engine (has to be cheaper than a brand new truck, and better than a used truck that I don't know how it was maintained)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Go "old school"? by quintessent · · Score: 2

      You can go longer than 3000 miles without an oil change. Consumer Reports investigated this and found 5000 to be just fine. Of course, Jiffy Lube will never tell you that.

    2. Re:Go "old school"? by cr0sh · · Score: 2

      I know you probably can, and there have been times when I have gone for 4000 or so between - still, doing it more often can't hurt, and might be better in order to flush out the contaminants (dirt, metal particles) in the engine, because you would be doing it more often, giving less time for the particles to do serious damage. Also, most people don't change their filter until an oil change - I would imagine just changing your filter would get you to 5000 or 6000 miles until the oil change, but if you leave in the filter, it won't do its job. Changing the oil is a quick and cheap thing to do, especially if you do it yourself.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:Go "old school"? by LordSah · · Score: 2

      Some folks like having brand-new cars. I've never been able to afford that, but a lot of folks I work with can. They buy a new car every 3 years because it's what they want, and they can do it without going broke. I can't really argue with them :)

    4. Re:Go "old school"? by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I found it strange that my Honda Civic's manual said 7,500, but the Honda dealer (who was in the oil change business) said 3,000.

    5. Re:Go "old school"? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Ford and most manufacturers recomend 5K, with cheap oilfilters and cheaper oil you may want to do it every 3K. My dad drives upwards of 70K miles a year and he only gets his oil changed about once a month. Of course during the first 3K miles on my new car I changed the oil 3 times, once at 100 miles, once at 1K miles, and once at 3K. The most engine wear by far happens in the first 1K miles, after that everything is going to mate well until the engine really starts to deteriorate.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  19. One thing to look for in alarms.. by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One thing i'm looking into for the alarm on my truck... Someone tried to get my truck a couple months back, luckily the factory alarm had ignition kill, or they'd be gone, all I lost was the radio and had to get the window/ignition repaired.. but I didn't HEAR the alarm because i'm in a condo complex and too far from the truck.. CodeAlarm has one alarm for 350 which you can plug windows/doorlocks/ignition modules into it, ignition kill, AND the remote beeps when the alarm goes off.. this is a MAJOR plus if you're living in a place where you can't always hear your alarm.. also, when it goes off, you'll KNOW it's YOURS.. that's the one i'm going to pick up.

    -matt

    1. Re:One thing to look for in alarms.. by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Informative

      they didn't steal your truck cause they were there to steal your radio. sounds like the alarm didn't help at all...

      That's what I thought at first too, until I tried to start it and the ignition was all jacked up from them trying to start it. The alarm was a factory alarm, just honked, and as I said, i'm too far away from the truck at home to hear it when it goes off, that's why I suggest the CodeAlarm which beeps when the alarm goes off

      -matt

  20. Re:Your Sig by glitch_ · · Score: 2

    Would you mind telling me what the object was that you put on that page that makes IE crash? Just satisfying a curiosity.

  21. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    Still it slows them down. It is impossible to prevent a car from beling stolen ever. The poitn of an alarm, The club and other devices is to jsut slwo them down until someone else notices (and scared them away) or they get tired (and give up).

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  22. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by qengho · · Score: 2

    Still it slows them down

    For the five seconds it takes them to snip the steering wheel with a bolt cutter.

  23. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    Your wrong.... it will take him at least 2 minutes.. youc an onyl way it off or use a torch. I tried cutting those babies with a bolt cutter.. no luck.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  24. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by qengho · · Score: 2

    I tried cutting those babies with a bolt cutter.. no luck.

    If you read my post carefully, you'll note that the bolt cutters are to be used on the steering wheel, not the Club. Like I said, five seconds.

  25. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    I was talking about the steering wheel. Have you ever tried in person? I have. On a 1988 Blazer and on a 1992 Maxima. It took me about 8 minutes with a hacksaw. I do not know where you got your 5 second BS, but the fact is that the steering wheel is made out of re-enforced steel. How the hell do you think you can cut it with 5 seconds?? If it was just plastic ok... but steel? You ever tried using on a hacksaw on a pad lock? Ok same thing but the metal is thicker.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  26. Just use the key by Tet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now call me old fashioned, but just because your car now comes with a remote, there's no reason to actually use it. Why not just continue using the key as normal? That way you're not exposed. Of course, that won't work with cars like the new Renault Laguna that are only accessible with the remote. But the vast majority (at least here in Europe) still have a key. Use it. The remote is a useless gimmick anyway.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Just use the key by kill-hup · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here in the Northeast US, I love not dealing with frozen locks in the winter. It's quite nice to be able to just "click" open the doors without dealing with lock de-icer on particularly nasty days.

      --
      Sinepaw.org: Grape Winos
  27. Re:Why worry about it? by benjamindees · · Score: 2
    "Ask Slashdot how to wipe my ass"

    Just because you'd rather pay your insurance company to wipe your ass doesn't mean everyone else does.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  28. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by jeff67 · · Score: 2

    I've never tried it, but I've heard that a strong person wearing gloves can brace their foot on the steering wheel, pull on the club, and break it at it's weakest point: one of the detents that the lock latches into.

    At those points, it's probably about half the diameter of the rest of the club.

  29. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by afidel · · Score: 2

    Steering wheels on all modern cars are soft to reduce chest injuries during accidents. Also I saw a neat little toy that a repo man had made, it consisted of two clamps that attached to either side of the club and a screw, he rotated the large arm on the screw twice and the club shattered in half, took about 10 seconds. I have also seen live demonstrations where a car thief would show a news reporter how quickly they could hack through the steering wheel, average time: 15 seconds. The fact is, stealing a car is becoming much harder because many cars now come with a chip in the key that interacts with the electronic ignition system so the car won't start even if they pop the lock. Look for carjackings to rise. Also more serious crooks now get a tow truck and tow the stolen car to the chop shop, no one even looks twice at a tow truck towing a car with an alarm going off.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  30. Re:Not relevant - The Club is good! by McFly69 · · Score: 2

    I think I know you in person... Is your first name Alex?

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  31. Related question by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    What is the best way to go about putting together an alarm system that's actually worth installing? I have a little sports car (240SX) that isn't worth much now but after various mods it'll be worth stealing. I had an IROC stolen from me in SF (go figure) with no theft coverage, good bye car. (IROCs are VERY frequently stolen there, wish I'd known that sooner.) I have hood locks on the car, so that makes it slightly more annoying to get into parts of it (no one is likely to steal my battery) and I'm contemplating a heavy steel plate to stop battery punches. What else can I do (besides the "hidden" kill switch, what an annoyance.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"