Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Mutuality, Transport, Spyware

Slashback with more unintentionally odd clip art in Microsoft work for fire, Las Vegas monorail progress, the resolution of SonicBlue and TiVo's legal dispute, and more. Read on for the details.

Well, while we were switching things around here at the ad agency ... An anonymous reader writes "While looking around on Microsoft's site checking out the new Tablet PCs I noticed something very out of Place. In one of their Flash Demos for the Tablet PC there is an Apple Powerbook 1400! To see it for yourself, the flash is located here (then "Tablet PC Overview Demo," then "Tablet PC," then "Powerful") The first computer is really that Powerbook! Pic here."

What about to the legal brothels? Sacarino writes "Back in April, Slashdot ran a story about the Monorail project Las Vegas was embarking upon. It would appear that things are progressing nicely. "It's ugly" critics will be put to shame, the designers did a great job of making it non-obtrusive. (if that's possible in Vegas) Soon you too will pile off the airplane, trudge onto the monorail, then run into the casino to spend that money....ahh, Vegas."

Out of court, out of mind. Enry writes "SONICblue and TiVo have dropped the patent infringement lawsuits they filed against each other. The press release reads: "We believe our energies are better spent expanding the market for Digital Video Recorders (DVRs) rather than fighting each other. Both sides believe in the merits of their respective positions, but the overall success of the DVR category is what is most important to the companies at this time." Take that, AdAge!"

Sounds like a nice way to watch movies. For those intrigued by a 640x480, QWERTY-keyboard color, clamshell-case PDA as embodied by the Zaurus 5600, patrickoehlinger writes "Just found news and pictures about the new Sharp Zaurus SL-C700 released in Japan. With a 640 x 480 pixel display, a small design and a great keyboard! Golem.de has a article with pictures, but it's in German."

Would the BBC spy on you? An anonymous reader writes "The previous discussion on RedSheriff on slashdot was extremely confusing as well as mostly off-topic. The fact is, the BBC is downloading spyware to your machine when you surf their site. Very disappointing and surprising. I suggest e-mailing them to let them know what you think. The problem and remedies are covered in Google groups: "

116 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. BBC and spyware by Slashdotess · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, it's unfortunate but a lot more sites are doing that, as far as I can see. I always get gator popups here at sparknotes for example and it's a pain to click no all the time.

    Well, I guess my 2 cents wont get very far =/

    1. Re:BBC and spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      An extremely effective solution I've found is to set up Internet Junkbuster proxy (at http://www.junkbuster.com/ijb.html) on your own computer. On Windows systems, you can have it run as a service. Have your web browser use the proxy, and whenever you see an annoying ad, just add it to the blockfile. The proxy automatically rereads the block file if it's updated while it's running, so changes take effect immediately. Just a couple seconds ago, it blocked a potential x-10 ad :P

    2. Re:BBC and spyware by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you used Mozilla on your Windows box you wouldn't have that problem... I just tried it for myself and no popups or Gator installs.

    3. Re:BBC and spyware by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Informative
      The Proxomitron is another such solution, and offers such nifty features such as inline ad filtering/right-click unlocking/prevention of annoying javascript/anything else you can do with a regex. Definintely a recommended tool.

      Strangely enough, though, I've been using Phoenix for a while now, and have had no problem with popups. :D

    4. Re:BBC and spyware by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "If you used Mozilla on your Windows box you wouldn't have that problem... I just tried it for myself and no popups or Gator installs."

      Just one more reason why I use mozilla religiously and disable activeX downloads in MSIE by using X-Setup.

      Seriously, gator has gotten to epidemic levels. I'm a university student (in Canada) and I've gotten to the point where whenever I log onto a machine, I automatically fire up Ad-Aware and scrup the machine for spyware. (Every engineering student gets 500 mb to store/install whatever.) 60%+ of the time gator is running, plus there's a bunch of bonzibuddy shite. The really bad ones have cnsmin installed which is much harder to get rid of. (Ad-aware can't do it on its own.)

      The point I'm trying to make here is that it's gotten to the stage where it's "everyone for themselves." The web is the wild wild west and only those gunslingers who are the fastest and smartest remain at the top of the food chain.

    5. Re:BBC and spyware by mrbuttle · · Score: 2, Informative

      The last official release from Junkbusters Co. was in 1998. You may want to take a look at Privoxy . It's Junkbuster rebuilt, with many new features, at version 3.0 and a release date of Aug 28 2002. It's available in most of the favorite flavors

    6. Re:BBC and spyware by zandermander · · Score: 2

      Funny, I just went to the link you posted and I didn't get a pop-up.

      Oh, wait... maybe it's because I use Mozilla!

      Yeah, cheap shot but someone had to make it...

      ;-)

    7. Re:BBC and spyware by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the moment, I'm posting with Crazy Browser. It's free but not Open Source, and it's a small wrapper for the IE rendering engine that does tabbed browsing and popup killing all in one.

      Hope you guys find it useful :). Otherwise, I also use Phoenix, similar with Mozilla.

  2. Monorail!? by Pean · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lyle Lanley: Well, sir, there's nothing on earth Like a genuine, Bona fide, Electrified, Six-car Monorail!
    What'd I say?
    Ned Flanders: Monorail!
    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?
    Patty+Selma: Monorail!
    Lyle Lanley: That's right! Monorail!
    Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud...
    Lyle Lanley: It glides as softly as a cloud.
    Apu: Is there a chance the track could bend?
    Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend.
    Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs?
    Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs.
    Abe: Were you sent here by the devil?
    Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level.
    Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can.
    Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man.
    I swear it's Springfield's only choice...
    Throw up your hands and raise your voice!
    All: Monorail!
    Lyle Lanley: What's it called?
    All: Monorail!
    Lyle Lanley: Once again...
    All: Monorail!
    Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken...
    Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!
    All: Monorail!
    Monorail!
    Monorail!

    --
    ----------
    "Duffman says a lot of things, OH YEAH!" - Duffman
    1. Re:Monorail!? by Cyno01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mono! D'oh!

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Monorail!? by Kragg · · Score: 3, Funny

      '-1 Wanker. Too much Simpsons. It was funny now it aint.'

      On an offtopic note, how about people get to enter their own + or - reason?

      +1 just.
      -1 wrong.
      -1 quiet, the adults are talking
      +1 damn, you're famous, people need to hear you

      --
      If you can't see this, click here to enable sigs.
    3. Re:Monorail!? by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

      You call that an anchor?

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  3. detection and removal of redsherrif by axjms · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to sound like too much of an idiot but the newspost didn't have much in the way of detecting the spyware on my box. I suppose it is safe to assume if I have hit the BBC site lately I am "infected" but I would like to be able to remove it manually not just disable it in the firewall. Anybody willing to offer some insight on this on both win2k(work) and linux boxes?

    --
    It is not enough to succeed, others must fail. - Gore Vidal
    1. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ad-Aware works pretty well

    3. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by VS1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      its a java applet, called RedSheriff. check your firewall logs. i found the google discussion group to be quite informative. and ad-aware dosnt find it, so says the googel discussion that was posted with the story.

      good luck.

      --
      "Humanize war? You might as talk about humanizing hell!" -- British Admiral Jacky Fisher
    4. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't understand what this java applet is supposed to do. Is is supposed to stay in memory and watch you as you surf other sites? I don't see how it can. Java applets embedded in web pages only run while you are at the page. There are java applications that can do more stuff, but they have to be signed and I think you need to click Yes on a security dialog. What is it that this java applet actually does?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by Merkins · · Score: 4, Informative
      I don't understand what this java applet is supposed to do. Is is supposed to stay in memory and watch you as you surf other sites? I don't see how it can

      It doesn't stay in memory. It just loads up on every page of the site that is using it and sends back details like referers and time spent between pages back to Red Sherrif. Red Sherrif are basically an Internet market research company.

      So, while it does track usage on the BBC site as well as any other Red Sherrif client sites, it isn't the same as something like Gator which will hang around on your PC and do other nasty stuff in the background.

      There is another company that do it (although maybe they have merged now) called IMR Worldwide.

    6. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2
      Well I don't see what the problem is then. The referrer stuff is trivial to get anyway (don't browsers send the referrer as part of every HTTP request?). The only new information Red Sherrif can gather is the time spent on the last BBC page you visit and the link you use to leave the site. This information could be gotten other ways, such as links that bounce through bbc servers (http://bbc.co.uk/leavesite.cgi?www.foosite.com), although this would be a bit slower and wouldn't work in all cases.

      I don't see what the big deal is. Just because the Internet wasn't originally designed such that sites couldn't tell how you left them doesn't make that information sacred. If Red Sherrif was tracking all of your browsing, then THAT would be a violation of privacy. If you're really THAT concerned about browsing totally anonymously, you should be using Anonymizer or even browsing Freenet or something.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    7. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by jon_eaves · · Score: 4, Informative
      IMR Worldwide was called Sofres IMR (and a bunch of other names I can't remember) and has changed their name to RedSheriff.

      The software used to be called WebMeasure, and now to maintain corporate branding it's "RedMeasure"

      This stuff has been around for just ages. I was part of the company that wrote this software for them originally. It has been around since 1997/98 however it's just started to be used by more people It's nothing more than a slightly sophisticated cookie, and if you don't trust my word for it, download it and decompile it.

      I just looked at the Beebs source code from their home page and it's exactly the same as it was back then.

      Anyway, here's the source code. Check for yourself. (Thanks to DJ's decompiler) It's doing nothing more than sending the duration of the time on a particular page.

      For the non-appleted amongst us, start() occurs when the page is loaded, stop() occurs when the page is left.

      Grrrrr, frigging lameness filter stopped me from posting the source. Anyway, get it from here.

    8. Re:detection and removal of redsherrif by greenrd · · Score: 2
      Well, that may or may not be true. However, the applet should be disposed and shouldn't be able to actually do anything at that stage apart from use the CPU.

  4. Monorail Gamble by greymond · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm all for that thing - Actually I think EVERY CITY IN THE WORLD should have a monorail and then we should have monorails connected by super fast trains - then I won;t have to fly anymore. I HATE flying, not because of terrorists - I just don't have wings and don;t like being flung around in a giant metal bird.

    1. Re:Monorail Gamble by ekrout · · Score: 5, Funny

      So basically you can't stand to fly. You're not that naive, and are just out to find the better part of yourself.

      It must not be easy being you.

      --

      If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    2. Re:Monorail Gamble by BitHive · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, let's replace all public phone booths with transporter booths, that way we can go anywhere in the world for a few dollars! And then we can power our homes with fusion reactors and have picnics on the moon with Jesus!

    3. Re:Monorail Gamble by zulux · · Score: 2, Funny

      and have picnics on the moon with Jesus!

      And then we can all go play Duke Nukem Forever! Together!

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    4. Re:Monorail Gamble by geekoid · · Score: 2

      perhaps you should try using an airplane instead of a giant metal bird.

      FYI, they do serve alcohol on airplanes... ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Redsheriff by dolo666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a link to Redsheriff's privacy policy, cached on google (just in case).

    1. Re:Redsheriff by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here is a link to the Redsherrif removal info.

  6. Homer sez... by ocie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello, Vegas? Give me 100 bucks on red... D'oh! All right, I'll send you a check.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  7. Re:PowerBook: isn't it obvious? by ekrout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not quite.

    The Apple PowerBook 1400 ships with a 133MHz proc., 16MB of DRAM, and a 750MB hard disk drive.

    In the Flash movie on Microsoft's site, it's shown running Windows XP, which simply wouldn't happen on a box with such meager specs.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  8. Powermac too by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you can sit through the whole demo, there's a second mac. About two thirds of the way through is a PowerMac Desktop I'm gussing circa 1996. I'm no mac expert. Maybe someone else can identify the model?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:Powermac too by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, the MS marketing department obviously has no clue what they are doing then...

      Marketing Manager: Look, give me some Microsoft notebooks and a Microsoft PC to use in our new flash on the double!
      MicroSerf: Uhm, we don't make those, we only cripple them.
      Marketing Manager: Damn it! What is the first, least expensive thing you can find?
      MicroSerf: Uhm, this company we just bought out used "Macintosh" equipment, so called "Powerbooks" as wel as some sort of desktop system...
      Marketing Manager: Excellent! We'll use those! Make sure the flash files include blue gradients.
      MicroSerf: Blue gradients?
      Marketing Manager: LOTS of blue gradients and a cheesy music that would make a Game Boy cry.
      MicroSerf: Jawohl herr oberst!
    2. Re:Powermac too by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      It is a 7600. The floppy drive is lower than the CD. With the 7200, the floppy was considered your main removable storage option.

      (The Mac in my office is a 700... No, I am not a dealer in antiquities.)

      ~Hammy

    3. Re:Powermac too by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 4, Interesting
      in all likelihood MS contracts an advertising firm to create the flash demo for them. Ad firm creative directors then mine for stock art of people using computers and them photoshop XP onto the monitors. Since the stock art is created by yet more advertising types, the computers in said stock art is more likely to be macintosh than is statistically likely in a sample of office situations.

      Ahh, advertising... the festering, never healing scab on the ass of American Industry.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    4. Re:Powermac too by tupps · · Score: 3, Informative

      It could actually be one of the 7200/7500/7600/BeigeG3DT machines. They were all in exactly the same form factor, all with the floppy drives in the same places. See here: http://www.apple-history.com/quickgallery.html?whe re=7600.html I am not 100% sure but I would nearly say that there are no Apple desktops with the floppy drive below the CD ROM drive.

      --
      Go out and get sailing!
  9. "downloading to"? by Klerck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The fact is, the BBC is downloading spyware to your machine when you surf their site."

    Last I checked, the BBC would be UPLOADING software to your machine. You would be the one downloading it. God I'm sick of people misusing that word.

    1. Re:"downloading to"? by elvum · · Score: 2, Funny

      hmmm... how about "off-loading"? :-)

    2. Re:"downloading to"? by danox · · Score: 2

      or even 'shooting their load'...

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    3. Re:"downloading to"? by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Last I checked, the BBC would be UPLOADING software to your machine. You would be the one downloading it. God I'm sick of people misusing that word.

      Originally "download" meant transfer from a large mainframe to a small client, while "upload" meant transfer from a small client to a large mainframe - regardless of which end initiated the transfer.

      However, since a mainframe wouldn't be likely to initiate a transfer, normally downloading = receiving, and uploading = sending. These became the new meanings of the words.

      So yes, the meanings have changed, but understand that some people haven't caught on yet. Go easy on them.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:"downloading to"? by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 2

      The misuse probably came from the same mentality which decided that 'to learn' was equivalent to 'to teach', as in "I'll learn you this".

      Aarghhhh!

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
  10. It Worked by cscx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, while we were switching things around here at the ad agency

    And in doing so, it got a front-page link on Slashdot, direct to the Microsoft Tablet PC demo / info page. Thanks, Slashdot!

  11. Downloading by DarkZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The previous discussion on RedSheriff on slashdot was extremely confusing as well as mostly off-topic. The fact is, the BBC is downloading spyware to your machine when you surf their site. Very disappointing and surprising. I suggest e-mailing them to let them know what you think.

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't trust technical "facts" from people that don't know the difference between downloading and uploading. That's like hiring a plumber that asks you what room the bathroom sink is in.

    1. Re:Downloading by cpeterso · · Score: 5, Funny


      That's like hiring a plumber that asks you what room the bathroom sink is in.


      Actually, it's more like hiring a plumber who drinks from your toilet and pees in your sink.

    2. Re:Downloading by pyrrho · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's more like a distinction that hardly matters at all...

      --

      -pyrrho

    3. Re:Downloading by Narcissus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree, especially when the historical definition of "download" infers moving data from a large machine to a PC (despite who initiated the act). Which is exactly what is happening in this instance.

      Well, according to the Jargon file, anyway...

  12. Las Vegas by cscx · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should have used the money to repair the potholes on Main Street.

    Don't want the prostitutes tripping and falling into holes, now do ya?

  13. steve balmer by thopo · · Score: 3, Funny

    seems like someone over at MS just lost his job. maybe some MS employee secretely rooting for the Apple Switch campaign.
    If Steve Balmer needs a reason to jump up and down like a crazy monkey again, here is it!

    --
    keep it simple.
  14. Spyware, by Openadvocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What bothers me most about spyware and insecure windooze programs(outlook etc) is that you can secure your PC by tweaking the right knobs, but then the time comes for that 1/2 year re-install and you have to start all over and remember what to turn off where etc.
    Installing a Windooze pc and connecting it to the internet requires so much work before you can say it's secure. And then there is all the spyware that comes with "great" shareware programs, so you really need a seperate partition to test the programs on first before installing them on your primary installation. Then you need programs like Ad-Aware and a personal firewall to keep track of programs that likes to phone home(have even seen programs with no network functionality all of the sudden wants to contact a server on the net).
    Oh, and let's not forget antivirus software etc etc.
    So I installed a Linux dist, not because I think that it's impossible to infiltrate it, but because the focus on all that Crap-ware has not yet turned too bad there and I feel more in control over what's going on under the hood. Now if only they would make the fonts look right, they are getting better, but not 100% yet.

    I thinking about those 90% of the people with a connection to the internet, who does not have any clue to what's going on. And the great concept with Windooze was that they shouldn't need to know everything about computers to use them. These days they don't, but they do get their pc 0wned in a mild way. :)

    We are beginning to see ISPs offer secure/firewalled connections to the internet. So that might be a new feature(income) for them, firewalling,spam blocking, blocking "bad" ip's. I have seen advertising for it, but I haven't looked into it.

    --
    my sig
    1. Re:Spyware, by FattMattP · · Score: 2
      What bothers me most about spyware and insecure windooze programs(outlook etc) is that you can secure your PC by tweaking the right knobs, but then the time comes for that 1/2 year re-install and you have to start all over and remember what to turn off where etc.
      That's why the first thing I do after I get a Windows install just the way I want it, I boot from a linux floppy or CD and dd the whole drive, pipe to bzip2, and store it on a samba share. I can later split that file and burn it to CDs. My current install takes about three CDs.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  15. RedSherriff by sulli · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the usenet posting:

    Thanks. The spyware is called RedSheriff. It's a Java applet and its the first spyware that I've identified as running as Java.

    Step one: Unclick "Java" in Preferences

    Step two: There is no step two! There is no step two!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:RedSherriff by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Step three: Profit!!!

      profit from no spyware that is..

    2. Re:RedSherriff by MoThugz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cool... first the BBC is downloading to my computer using some kind of unexplained supernatural forces.

      Now, I learnt that I can actually unclick Java. Cool.

      If these aren't News for Nerds... I don't know what stuff actually matters anymore.

  16. Can't read German? by saskboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try Babelfish for translation so you can read about PDAs. I don't use PDAs with built in keyboards, but someone else might find the article interesting.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  17. BBC privacy policy by elvum · · Score: 5, Informative

    The BBC mentions their use of RedSheriff in their privacy policy. RedSheriff have their own privacy policy.

  18. Taxies by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Monorail from the Airport? Man, that would ROCK HARD. No having to take the shuttles with endless stops or taxis with 20 years of grime built up.

    I do feel a bit sorry for the taxi drivers: this is going to kill 80% of them. Apparently the union is not that powerful in Vegas. :) [which is yet another lesson why union's suck and why they tend to retard progress, but that's a rant for another day]

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Taxies by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      Apparently the union is not that powerful in Vegas

      Ok, Ill bite. Why would the Taxi Drivers Union be opposed to this? Wouldnt they just ask for retraining and a kind transition into Monorail-Employees?

      Unions do not retard progress. Thats an opinionated assertion... utter bollocks.

    2. Re:Taxies by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Ok, Ill bite.

      See how this tastes...

      Why would the Taxi Drivers Union be opposed to this? Wouldnt they just ask for retraining and a kind transition into Monorail-Employees?

      Do you know you how many taxis there are in Vegas? A huge number. How many jobs do you think there are for a bunch of high-school dropout drivers? I'm sure a lot of them will apply for monorail jobs, but there's no way it would be able to accomodate all of them.

      But let's be generous and say that half of the drivers would be put out of work, and the other 30% would find monorail jobs. Do you really think a union would let that fly? It would be "hire everyone, even if they're useless, or no monorail".

      Unions do not retard progress. Thats an opinionated assertion... utter bollocks.

      OK, let's not talk theory. Let's talk reality from my own backyard.

      I have a friend who used to work for Los Angeles Unified School District, home of one of the absolute worst unions in the US -- the teacher union. She worked at an inner city magnet school, and couldn't believe how the union screwed everything. They had a third grade teacher, a few years from retirement, who would basically hand out coloring assignments every day. But they couldn't fire her -- because the union said so. No, the union was too busy making sure the principle didn't have their own parking space, because that was "discriminatory" (I swear I'm not making this up). The stories she would tell were astounding. I hope there is a special place in hell for the leaders of the teacher union.

      Or perhaps you heard of the Longshoreman's strike/lockout around here, which the harbor is basically in my line of site from my hill-side house (it was actually pretty cool seeing hundreds of ships in the harbor). A Longshoreman -- someone how moves around boxes on ships -- makes an average of $80,000 a year, and the foremans can make $167,000 (!!!).

      That is just insanity. For years the docks have wanted to automated the ports, like a lot of other ports around the country. Of course, the union opposed that -- unless their members got first choice of the jobs. Two problems with that: first, these are not college educated people. There are not going to be that many of them who are going to be able to move into higher-tech positions. Not to mention that a lot of jobs are going to be eliminated.

      But that's not even the biggest problem. The problem is that these people are insanely overpaid through years of giving in to the union. Of course, the docks want to use this opportunity to bring in fresh blood at more reasonable, market-level, rates.

      I should say that I have a longshoreman who lives down the street from me. Super-nice guy, and I really feel sorry for him. He lives in a union-supported bubble where he makes a LOT of money, and one of these days that bubble is going to burst, one way or another. More power to him to make as much money as he can, but you can only go so long when you are so far above normal supply and demand rules.

      Unions suck. I should also say that unions haven't always sucked -- there was a big purpose for them back in the 19th and early 20th centuries, but they're just not needed now. The reason is that unions are only needed when you have very little employee mobility. But in modern society with modern communication, the employees have much more power than in the past.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  19. That's why I use Opera by RatBastard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since I moved to Opera I've not had to deal with any Gators or other crap like that. Opera Beta 7.0 is really nice (once you get used to it) and is worth the money, IMHO.

    With IE you really get what you pay for. Nothing.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  20. 'Spyware' by r1ch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, I guess I'll probably lose a load of karma for this cos it sounds like I'm sticking up for spyware but what the hell... having looked at RedSherriff's website all this java applet really does is allow them to get around the problems that proxies and caches cause for people that want to find out how many page hits they got - is that really spyware?

    PS - sorry for not jumping on the bandwagon.

    1. Re:'Spyware' by HamNRye · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Any program that is forced upon you is spyware. If McDonald's made you fill out a questionaire as a term for buying a Big Mac, how would you react?

      I simply do not believe that any website author has the right to upload any program on my computer as a condition of viewing content. I don't care what the software does.

      That being said, it does not appear that red sherrif performs like most spyware and remains active as a service 24/7 on the resident machine. But for those of us who are security concious, and the Firewall admins out there, this is a big deal. I am an admin for a newspaper. This immediately explained the large amounts of traffic going to the IP's mentioned in the group posting.

      Like most businesses, we expense our bandwidth. Red Sherrif Traffic only accounted for .03% of traffic today, but we are also yanks, and we don't read the stinkin' beeb. (God forbid other voices were to leak through the American propaganda machine.) Over time, I might see this traffic rise up to the 1% area and would have to really start to take measures. (Infact, the .03% traffic originated from only 14 unique IP's out of ~300 for the newsroom alone.)

      Does that answer your question??

      ~Hammy
      MY Mission: To build the biggest freak list on /.

    2. Re:'Spyware' by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Any program that is forced upon you is spyware.

      No, no, no-no-NO!

      Spyware, a contemporary of "adware" or "freeware" and a derivitive of "shareware", is "software that you pay for, in whole or in part, by being spied upon."

      Programs downloaded as part of a web site that spy on you can be called spyware, even though what you get is a website, not a program.

      I believe the correct word for "all programs forced on you" is "trojan." Feel free to come up with a new one if it doesn't fit, but please don't co-opt "spyware" to mean something that it doesn't.

    3. Re:'Spyware' by LordXarph · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I simply do not believe that any website author has the right to upload any program on my computer as a condition of viewing content. I don't care what the software does.

      I see your point, but there is a fault in your semantics. You act as if the IP addresses hosting the software is drawing your computer out of a hat, uploading whatever the hell they feel like, and executing it. This is wrong.

      Your browser requested the data referenced in the HTML/JavaScript of the web page that you initiated a connection to. Your browser is configured to do this. You can configure your browser not to do this. I cannot think of a single website that forces you to install anything. I can think of many that recommend installation of third party closed software to properly interpret raw data coming down the pipe, and will install it IF you have your browser configured to allow such activity.

      I do not like surreptitious installation of software or deceivingly 'free' programs. But when you get down to it, spyware plays by the rules set down by the configuration of YOUR browser.

      Do not scream and bitch about invasion of privacy because you left up the "open house" sign after moving in.

      -Lx?

  21. From the RedSheriff website.. by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    They seem to work for a lot of people...

    Founded in 1996, RedSheriff is an industry leader in interactive measurement technologies and market research. We provide specialized products and services that enable you to accurately assess your company's performance in the constantly evolving digital environment.

    RedSheriff measures in 37 countries through regional offices in Melbourne, Sydney, Auckland, Brisbane, Singapore, Tokyo, London, Copenhagen, Milan, Los Angeles, San Francisco and headquarters in New York. We also have strategic partnerships with several major industry players including the AGB Group, Taylor Nelson Sofres Gallup, and Video Research.

    Our client base includes key global players such as BT LookSmart, Excite, Excite@Home, News Interactive, F2 Interactive, Scandinavia Online, Monster.com, MTV, NineMSN.com, Virgin Direct, Virgin, Genie Internet, Asia World Online, Charles Schwab and Telstra.

    Our strategic investment partners include Deutsche European Partners, Ericsson-Deutsche Technology Fund, WPP, Australasian Media and Communication Fund, and Equity Partners.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  22. Zaurus pics by sakusha · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the home page of the new Zaurus model (Japanese only)

    http://www.sharp.co.jp/products/slc700/index.htm l

    I surfed around, looks like this unit has cool GPS maps available, that's the most interesting app I found.

  23. Sony's SL-C700 Site (Translated) by infernow · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's Sony's site (translated from japanese) on the SL-C700:

    You'll have to click the Translate button, but hey, deal with it.

    --

    that that is is that that is not is not

  24. Re:Sharp Zaurus SL-C700 by HamNRye · · Score: 3, Informative

    try http://dynamism.com. Not a plug! I haven't ordered from them, just browsed. Lik-Sang (http://lik-sang.com) has some other things, but tends to focus on Video Games.

  25. You can reverse the screen on an apple by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Slash dot had an article on how to reverse the screen on your apple powerbook duo. The guy used a glue gun and gave step by step instructions on turning your apple into a picture frame.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  26. RedSherrif by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay.. if this spyware is a java applet.... can someone explain what the problem is? It's an applet; it should be gone when you close your browser, and not come back until you visit a site that uses it.

    The java security model should prevent an applet from spying on you.. or am I mistaken?

  27. I don't know about the rest of you.... by Bobulusman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But, per the google group discussion, is used my firewall software to block a couple of IP addresses that the java program is based off of. I just visited the BBC news site, and I'm not getting record of a block to those IPs in my firewall logs. It is possible that they already took this stuff down?

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  28. redsheriff and Java VM sandbox by goombah99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I dont get it. the JAVA vm runs in a secure sandbox. the only way out of the sandbox is if you grant the JAVA program permission, for example by accepting a security certificate.
    Or am I missing somthing or is that exactly what is going on?
    my experience and understanding with java is that insecure applets cant access URLS outside their source URL, they cant access other open windows (or atleast not anything that javascript cant access), and they cant access any system level communications or your files on disk. Thus they cant be spying on you. And if you leave the site they go poof. I suppose they could be playing frame games making you think you left the site.

    can anyone tell me how they are getting around these restrictions?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:redsheriff and Java VM sandbox by jon_eaves · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're not.

      It's a Java applet that's like a cgi traced image. It's used for user tracking. It's not any more sinister than WebTrends or any of the other post-processing tools.

      Caveat: I worked for the company that wrote the first version of this software that was used by Red Sheriff.

  29. Re:Ever waited in a Comdex taxi line, mid 1990s? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    I pretty much skipped Comdex throughout the 90s (hotels too expensive, not enough interesting stuff, big rip-offs all around), but it was bad in the late 80s. I never took a Taxi anywhere; it was just a huge waste of time. I can only imagine that it got worse.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  30. Mozilla Immune? by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative

    From reading the USENET commentary on Google Groups, it seems like RedSheriff only works on Microsoft's broken virtual machine that ships with Windows. It appears that, if you install Sun's JVM, the problem doesn't arise (or at least alerts the user). This would also seem to suggest that Mozilla is immune, since they have their own JVM, yes?

    Yet another reason to avoid IE, I suppose.

    Schwab

    1. Re:Mozilla Immune? by EMR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozilla/Netscape 6/7 uses sun's JVM..
      And the code gets applet gets loaded in a popup anyway..
      so it doesn't load in mozilla if you enable the popup blocker..:-D
      But yeah.. it's an M$ IE Messed up JVM thing..

    2. Re:Mozilla Immune? by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      This would also seem to suggest that Mozilla is immune, since they have their own JVM, yes?

      Mozilla the JVM that's already installed on your system. Netscape 4.x (and earlier) has its own.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  31. Well then by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    "While looking around on Microsoft's site checking out the new Tablet PCs I noticed something very out of Place. In one of their Flash Demos for the Tablet PC there is an Apple Powerbook 1400! To see it for yourself, the flash is located here (then "Tablet PC Overview Demo," then "Tablet PC," then "Powerful") The first computer is really that Powerbook! Pic here."

    OH MY GOD

    This is the biggest news of the century!!!! FACINATING!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  32. Oh, and the linux experince is better? by goombah99 · · Score: 2
    Huh, why is that problem unique to windows?

    everytime I install an RPM I feel like someone is saying to me "close your eyes and open your mouth and you will get a big surprise". Then with root access the RPM sprays files in all sorts of directories, overwites system /bin files like "make" and inserts various conficuration scripts in dark places I've never visted in my unix life. Geeze its totally out of control.

    mandrake and a few others give you a gui package view that sort of says what's oging to be affected but it's not like you can remeber what happened a week or a year later.

    for my money the only system I am remotely at ease with is FINK for mac ( and linux). which rarely goes outside of its own directory to mess with basic system stuff.

    but you are right in wishing there was some sort of keystroke file for anytime you did an install or a tweak so you could re-do it later after a re-install or an upgrade.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Oh, and the linux experince is better? by Q2Serpent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not exactly on the same lines, but on my linux server I use RPMs, and I find it extremely convenient to run 2 scripts I wrote that back up certain files:

      Script 1 runs "rpm -Va" and checks the output for any files that have a different MD5 sum. It tars up all of these. (Most are in /etc).

      Script 2 looks at each file under given directories (I run it under /etc, /usr/local, and /var) and for any file found that doesn't belong to an rpm, it tars up.

      The result is this: if I had to reinstall things how I have them now on a new system, I can easily see which rpm files I changed (and have the changes right there), and also which files I added (also tar'd up).

      This is much easier than copying /etc somewhere, then referring to it on a new system. Sure you can see which files are different, but are they different because you changed them or because the newer rpm changed them?

      And of course, I keep a list of installed rpms. (rpm -qa > rpm.list).

      -Serp

    2. Re:Oh, and the linux experince is better? by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      cool, can I get your scripts?

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:Oh, and the linux experince is better? by goombah99 · · Score: 2

      Well okay that's a nice trick. But this does not really have much to do with tweaking config files, setting permissions of firewalls, creating aliases, fstabs , exports, aliases, password length enforcement, and so on. Then there are all those other sorts of packages like perl CPAN, or netscape plugins that need to be installed or removes (like AIM). all of which users as well as various installed programs and possibly installed in a particular order.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    4. Re:Oh, and the linux experince is better? by einstein · · Score: 2
      heck, just use
      less yourmomma.rpm
      --
  33. Monitoring is not spying by lesterhv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I walk into someone's store, the store is permitted to have someone follow me -- either in person, or by video camera. I'm on private property, and the property owner is entitled to watch what I am doing.

    When you surf on a site, you are accessing someone elses server. They are the property owner, and they have the right to a report to see what you are doing.

    There is nothing that I can see that RedSherriff becomes resident on your machine and watches you elsewhere. It just uses cookies to provide enhanced site stats to, in this case, the beeb.

    Nothing to see here... ...move right along, please.

    1. Re:Monitoring is not spying by bmetzler · · Score: 2
      has the right to make me pay for the film and to carry the camera

      What "film" and "carrying" does the bbc make you do? It's more like the store keeping a copy of your receipt.

      You went to their site, they paid attention to what you did there so that they could serve you better. It didn't cost you anything, and didn't even force you to do anything different. It's just part of the package.

      -Brent
  34. Tablet PC? by Openadvocate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would rather have wanted the IBM Transnote
    If the tablet PC should work, it should be cheap since I never really think it would be the only PC you would have. it would need to be thinner than it is. It wouldn't need a lot of fancy features. You could have a dockingstation that would give it more features, option for other graphiccard etc. It would have some very for some things, but bad for others.

    --
    my sig
  35. No legal brothels in Las Vegas, sorry... by weave · · Score: 5, Informative
    A common misunderstanding is that prostitution is legal in Las Vegas. It's not. It's only legal in counties where the population is less than 400,000 -- which is all Nevada counties except for two. One is Clark County where Las Vegas sits, the other is where Reno is.

    Sorry, you'll just have to drive out to the ole ranch there ya city slicker!

    1. Re:No legal brothels in Las Vegas, sorry... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      That brings up an interesting question for a Canadian. ... Do they have to pay extra money to the state for the extra health problems they cause? (STDs etc.)

      The simple answer to that is no, because we don't have a state-run medical system like y'all. They pay for their own medical care, so the state doesn't have jack shit to say about the "cost" of STDs. It works quite well, as you may have noticed. Our system doesn't run out of money in october, forcing heart patients to go out of the country for surgery.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:No legal brothels in Las Vegas, sorry... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      There is flaw in your logic. Consider a prostitute that contratcs a STD. You claim she will pay for her own healthcare, but while she is recovering from the said STD she cannot work and will not have an income and hence will not be able to pay for treatment. For a case of syphilys (a few weeks/months antibiotica) she might get over it, but once she gets one of the nicer things like HIV, she is out of a job and has no alternatives.

      There's no flaw in my argument. You assume that legal prostitutes have no health insurance and must pay cash on the barrelhead for medical care. First of all, as a matter of state law, legal brothels in Nevada must carry medical insurance for their employees specifically to address the STD issue. Second, even if this weren't the case, there's nothing stopping anyone from insuring themselves or even just setting aside some cash for necessary medical expenses. Your scenario is a bit contrived because it assumes an unemployed, uninsured, indigent sex worker with an STD, which in the case of Nevada's legalized prostitution is unheard of. Then, it assumes that such a case would somehow become an extra burden on the system, which it wouldn't. There are already numerous free clinics providing basic treatment for STDs that already deal with illegal prostitution/drug addicts-- problems which can't be solved by levying a "health fee" upon legal brothel employees, because street-whores and junkies aren't legal brothel employees.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:No legal brothels in Las Vegas, sorry... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Nice points, I just don't trust insurances. They are always finding ways to weasle out of paying. Never noticed how many legal actions there are ove insurances not paying?

      Frankly, I've never heard of such legal actions, except in the case of cheaper HMO-type insurance with experimental procedures.

      That's why I prefer governemnt managed healthcare. Every system has it's advantages. It just means I pay for the healthcare of prostitutes too, and honestly, I don't mind. As long as I get my teatment when I'll be sick/have an accident.

      Even if you are indigent and have no insurance, you get treated in the US. We have emergency centers that treat anyone who walks in. They will send you a bill when you're done, but if you don't have the money, they can't (and won't) make you pay. Do you get the absolute best medical care available for free? No, but it's about as good as you'll get from socialized medicine in, say, Canada-- and it doesn't "run out of funding" every year either.
      The main objection socialized-medicine proponents seem to have against the system here is that you can't get the best treatment for free, as if that's a violation of some basic human right. Medical care is no more a basic human right than clothing, food, or shelter. True, all these things are important to survival, but none of them are things that any living creature gets for free. They are things that must be worked for-- either produced by ones own labor, or bartered from the labor of another. People have the right to life liberty and property, but not the right to free stuff, because free things always come at the cost of another's labor.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  36. FWIW by unicorn · · Score: 2

    It's a private project. If you read around about it, you'll find that the city isn't paying for it, at all. It's financed by a whackload of bonds, that will be paid off the revenues generated by fares.

    SO they didn't have to dip into the road repair funds at all. That's all still in the city coffers.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:FWIW by cscx · · Score: 2
  37. It reveals how you got to the BBC site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First of all, why are people saying this Red Sherriff stuff is Java-based? Am I missing something here? I can see some JavaScript stuff on the BBC site - is there a Java component too perhaps?

    As for what it's reporting ... well ... let's see:

    Excerpt from the source of http://news.bbc.co.uk/:

    {!-- START RedMeasure V4 - Java v1.1 $Revision: 1.9 $ --}
    {!-- COPYRIGHT 2000 Red Sheriff Limited --}
    {script language="JavaScript"}
    {!--
    var pCid="uk_bbc_0";
    var w0=1;
    var refR=escape(document.referrer);
    if (refR.length>=252) refR=refR.substring(0,252)+"..."

    /snip/

    {img src="http://server-uk.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/cou nt?ref='+
    refR+'&cid='+pCid+'" width=1 height=1
    }'

    /snip/

    if(navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac')!=-1){docum en t.write(imgN);
    }else{
    document.write('{applet code="Measure.class" '+
    'codebase="http://server-uk.imrworldwide.com/" '+'w idth=1 height=2}'+
    '{param name="ref" value="'+refR+'"}'+'{param name="cid" value="'+pCid+
    '"}{textflow}'+imgN+'
    {/textflow}{/ applet}')

    /snip/

    {/noscript}
    {/COMMENT}
    {!-- END RedMeasure V4 --}

    I'm not a JavaScript expert, but this says to me that the information is passed back to the Red Sherriff company by requesting a "web bug" ... in this case either a 1x1 or 1x2 pixel image. The information is passed in the request for that image. From what I see above, aside from the colateral stuff like your IP address, a "Customer ID" string of "uk_bbc_0" is passed, along with the "Document Referrer". That is, if you clicked a link on another website somewhere in order to get to news.bbc.co.uk, the URL of that referring website is sent to Red Sherriff.

    1. Re:It reveals how you got to the BBC site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, that part where it writes an applet tag into the document might be a clue :) The applet tag embeds an applet into the page. As such, it can dynamically load the Java applet into your browser.

      As to what this new program does, I have no idea. I haven't learned just what it does/how it works yet...

  38. Re:Las Vegas Monorail SUCKS! by weave · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, you must be talking about that toy monorail that goes between, what is it, caesars and bellagio? It actually is more like a cable car, gets pulled back and forth on a fixed cable....

  39. Re:PowerBook: isn't it obvious? by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 2

    Maaaayyyyybe, they're just running an old version of this with this.

    Well, you never know...

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  40. Re:(OT) Spark Notes by cscx · · Score: 2

    It wasn't meant to come across like that, it was trying for a (+1) Funny, is what it was trying to do.

  41. Redsheriff = MSN Australia + more! by mcdrewski42 · · Score: 2, Interesting


    FYI, NineMSN (Australia's own big brother presence on the web, and the default exit page for Hotmail from Aus) also uses Redsheriff.

    So does Suncorp Metway a BANK!!!

    As such, microsoft now knows where I bank. Scary.

    --
    /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += effect; }
  42. Re:PowerBook:isn't it obvious that you're a moron? by cscx · · Score: 3, Funny

    No. Remember, professionals design that advertising.

  43. Microsoft's Brilliant Strategy by Stubtify · · Score: 4, Funny
    Step 1: Create Tablet PC Flash Animation

    Step 2: Insert random Apple Powerbook 1400

    Step 3: Report "slip up" to Mac centered websites

    Step 4: Report that "over 20% of page views on the new tablet PC pages are from Macintosh computers." to interested third party vendors.

    So now they've got ammo for a real switch campain...

  44. Facts wrong on Zaurus 5600 by happynut · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Zaurus 5600 is 320x240 (1/4vga), not 640x480 as
    stated in the slashback.

    The C700 *is* 640x480.

  45. More sites wih RedSherrif by codepunk · · Score: 2

    http://www.smh.com.au/

    http://www.theage.com.au/

    http://www.cricket.org

    http://www.plannedchildhood.com

    Bastards!

    --


    Got Code?
  46. Not quite :) by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 2
    He was also (among many others) the voice of Troy McClure, who you may remember from such films as "I Was a Teenage Pr0n Junkie," "Goat.se.cx Boogie," and "Karma Whores in 3D."
    I wish he had said that! Here's my favourite one: "Hi, I'm Troy Maclure. You may remember me from such films as Today We Kill, Tomorrow We Die, and Gladys, the Groovy Mule!"

    My favourite Troy episode is where he does the musical version of The Planet of the Apes :
    Troy: Can I play the piano anymore?
    Dr Zaius: Of course you can!
    Troy: Well I couldn't before!
    *plays piano*
  47. Damn by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 2

    I can't believe I made a post about Troy Maclure and I didn't link to here.

  48. Speaking of 'switch' by SkulkCU · · Score: 2


    I just noticed today that there are ads with Tony Hawk and Yo Yo Ma.

    (not together)

    I'm hoping that they'll make some with Gates/Ballmer lookalikes...

    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
  49. The REAL SONICBlue question is... by samdu · · Score: 2

    ...if they've been able to solve their NASDAQ problems. Their stock has been under a dollar for a long time now (I bought some at .23 and sold at .47). The NASDAQ sent them formal notice several months ago that if they could not maintain a stock price above a dollar for three consecutive weeks by November, they'd be dropped from the exchange. That hasn't happened. The closest they've come is almost .75 cents for a few minutes. I'm not sure the company can survive long enough to make a run of it. I think they were just a touch ahead of their time. They're very probably going to be dropped from the NASDAQ, but more importantly, they're in debt and operating at a loss.

    1. Re:The REAL SONICBlue question is... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      The NASDAQ formally announced that they are reconsidering their dollar rule a week or two ago. Back in the 90s it seemed like a great idea. Now an appreciable chunk of stocks (not just tech stocks) are under $1. So many exceptions have been approved and extentions given that it's not really working as a "blanket" rule.

      Heard it on Morning Edition.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  50. Red Sheriff is not spyware by digidave · · Score: 2

    Has no one gone to redsheriff.com? They're a site visitor logging company. I use them at work instead of writing my own huge log files, which were upwards of 2GB/day. Instead, I just log a few things and let the Red Sheriff applet/Javascript combo do the visitor logging.

    Red Sherrif got the contract through our... *thinking of how I can make this anonymous* ...parent organization. I have never reviewed their terms of service, since we are not technically their customer, our "parent organization" is. I'll be sure to check this out and maybe submit it if I find any interesting info.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  51. Seattle monorail wins vote by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    Not by much, but a win, unless there's a problem and a recount. That will be a 14-mile system, biggest in North America.
  52. killer! by aminorex · · Score: 2

    add a 1.8" hd, 802.11b, and an extended-life battery,
    and that sharp device would conquer the u.s. ultra-
    portable market.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    1. Re:killer! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      You forgot an x86 CPU...

  53. Browser bug? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fact is, the BBC is downloading spyware to your machine when you surf their site.

    What browser allows BBC to send them spyware without the user's permission? If that really happens, it's a browser security bug. I'm surprised the spammers haven't leveraged this bug with their html mail efforts (if it's really that easy to install spyware on a user's system). I find it hard to believe this claim. Anyone have an explanation?

  54. Vegas monorail misconception by doormat · · Score: 2

    The monorail will not go to the airport in the initial building. The taxicab authority is too damn powerful to let the monorail go to the airport, they'd lose too much money. The money talks and the people walk... or hail a cab...

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  55. Re:Las Vegas Monorail SUCKS! by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was in Las Vegas this past summer. Whoever designed that monorail was completely incompetent! The doors and cars were too small, so when a handicapped person (and there's a lot of those in Las Vegas) got on, attendants had to go in and move seats around. This took about 20 minutes, which is ridiculous. And then the thing starts moving, and I keep waiting for it to speed up, but it keeps plodding along at snail pace. I could have walked to the one destination stop in less time. Thanks for wasting my time, monorail designers.

    The Disney World monorail is so much better.


    Hmmm...then you weren't on the actual monorail, but the crappy shuttle. The current monorail uses Bombardier Mark IV monorail cars that were actually acquired from Disney World.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  56. Re:Privacy Policy by LordXarph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My question: is RedSheriff running when you are NOT viewing a page at BBC, or is it only actively collecting data on viewing habits at BBC?

    If it's the former, HOW IS THIS TECHNICALLY POSSIBLE? It is running in the Java sandbox. If Java is not running or loaded, how can this thing run?

    If it's the latter, WHY IS THIS A BIG DEAL? It is just another method of gathering statistics on your own site; scripts and applications to do this that run in the web client have been around for years and relatively few people have been complaining.

    -Lx?

  57. Duplicate by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2

    The SonicBlue/Tivo dropped-lawsuit story is a duplicate.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/11/173523 0&mode=thread&tid=129

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  58. Re:Seattle monorail wins vote--hopefully by Animats · · Score: 2
    As of Saturday, the monorail is winning, but it's very close:

    PROPOSED MONORAIL AUTHORITY:
    YES: 89899 50.09%
    NO: 89570 49.91%

  59. Re:Seattle monorail losing by 3 votes! by Animats · · Score: 2

    As of Monday evening, it's losing by 3 votes! PROPOSED MONORAIL AUTHORITY YES: 92435 50.00% NO: 92438 50.00% Final figures tomorrow, after the last of the absentee ballots comes in.