Online Game Cluster
axehind writes "Carlo Daffara posted to the openMosix mailing list about his game cluster. It's a 6 node cluster using Athlon XP cpus and running linux & openmosix (with some qdisc trickery) for the OS. It is used to host approximately 1000 users playing online games, like Jedi Knight and Quake III. Here's a link (italian) to the pictures."
or:
:)
Il luogo è shashdotado.
1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
It is used to host approximately 1000 users playing online games
More like "It was used to..."
During the standard slash/dot.ing period, the cluster probably serves about two Quake players at max.
That same cluster spec running 1 instance of a game for someone to play on :).
Someday I hope for clustering software to be to the point where when someone at a LAN party goes to sleep, their processing power can be used to help other machines.
See the site here.
(I
Twenties Retirement
http://www.supercomputergaming.com/
is doing something similar. If you cut through all the marketing hype it looks pretty cool.
-M
Moshe said:
.net ads, by far! :)
Somebody should post this to Slashdot.org: How to assemble your own game server with openMosix
BTW, has anyone else seen the AppAssure soft-core porn ads here on slashdot? Better than the
Clusternig is not a buzz word. It's a very real solution to many of the problems faced by enterprise applications and infastructure. Combined with .Net can be used to aid in providing web services, giving you One Degree of Seperation for your customers. Combined with XML and RDBMS, clusters can provide you with the speed you need for your enterprise software, and the 5-9s reliability that you require, without vendor lock-in.
In short, clustering is the solutions for tomorrows problems today.
For a good time call www.sawkie.com
Here's a link (italian) to the pictures.
I've always heard that a picture is worth 1000 words, but no one ever mentioned I'd have to translate them all into English.
If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
Regarding the issues in the FAQ, most of the news isnt time critical, especially if its a link to a small site. So waiting 6 hours isnt a big deal. Despite the FAQ response I think it would still be a good idea.
In response to worrying about if the content changed: First of all it wouldnt be a big deal and second of all, how much harder would it be to recache it every 5-10 min ?
I think its time someone went ahead, thought it though and implemented it.
Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni