Slashdot Mirror


We Are Not Related

mao che minh writes "From Pravda.ru - German and American geneticists recently discovered that the neanderthal has nothing to do with modern day man's genealogy. I figured that the lack of a genetic relationship between the two species was already well known, especially when you consider the empirical evidence compiled thus far that concludes that cromagnon man and neaderthal coexisited. I suppose that the geneticists aim to put the story to bed with their DNA research."

65 comments

  1. what a strange article... by Hugh+Kir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if the report of this genetic discovery is true, it's not very surprising, as this has been discussed as a possibility for years. That said, given the article goes on to discuss a millenia-old mummy with cyborg implants and the possibility of UFOs as the origin of humankind, I question the authenticity of any information contained within said article.

    1. Re:what a strange article... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

      Yea, I basically ignored what was said in the rest of the article. The interesting part, in my opinion, was the research concerning the 30,000 year old DNA evidence. The rest is just flim flam.

    2. Re:what a strange article... by oyenstikker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When your government says (and enforces that) there is no such thing as the thing that is the most obvoius, and most likely correct, answer (God), you have to resort to aliens or something equally as unlikely.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    3. Re:what a strange article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Heeheheheehee.

      Obvious.

      Hahahaaawahahahaw.

    4. Re:what a strange article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, sure.

      Having been brainwashed since birth with that sort of nonsense causes one to believe that it's true and obvious.

    5. Re:what a strange article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The rest is just flim flam.

      Flim-flam man, a-flim-flam a-flamma-flamma
      Flim-flam man, a-flim-flam a-flamma-flamma

    6. Re:what a strange article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pravda has printed a lot of tabloid and The Onion style articles since the fall of the Soviet Union. Cyborgs? UFO? no friggin' way, Man! Also, studies that compare Neadertal to modern man never include Island and aboriginal peoples with protruding jaws ans sloping foreheads, just Europeans, and ocassionally Asians and Africans. Maybe some of us still have neandertal DNA.

    7. Re:what a strange article... by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1
      I truly thought my wheel mouse had scrolled too far and taken me to a second story. I scrolled back up. I was tempted to quit reading, but figured there must be a tie-in somwhere....

      What a waste of my time.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    8. Re:what a strange article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the thing that is the most obvoius, and most likely correct, answer (God)

      Great. In just one sentence you debunked the whole theory that the neanderthals genealogy has nothing to do with ours. Clearly, it does! Welcome to the 21st century, btw. Heard of a new cool thing called "science"? You should look into it.

    9. Re:what a strange article... by Squiffy · · Score: 1

      I guess that post was flambait.

    10. Re:what a strange article... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      When your government says (and enforces that) there is no such thing as the thing that is the most obvoius, and most likely correct, answer (God), you have to resort to aliens or something equally as unlikely.

      If you're talking about the USA, what the heck? Mainstream Christianity is threaded throughout American rituals. Heck, just flip your money over and take a look at the writing on the back of it for the most obvious example.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    11. Re:what a strange article... by oyenstikker · · Score: 2

      Read the article before you post. Its a Russian publication.

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  2. credibility of the story by ceejayoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is Slashdot taking seriously a story that includes speculation over whether a mummy found in Mongolia is an ancient cyborg?

    The scientists say that during its life, the mummy could have been a cyborg, a creature made by a combination of features of a robot and a hominid.

    If we rely upon many statements and the evidence of UFOs or extraterrestrial visits to Earth, we can consider our planet as a space colony. And different space centers are very active here. They send their robots, cyborgs, and hominids to the Earth to collect information and materials, to perform experiments on human beings, including even complex surgical operations. In many cases, these operations resulted in mutilations later treated as abnormalities by pathologoanatomists and archeologists. The experiments were evidently performed with a view to create new cloned creatures. These facts allow one to say talk about the alien origin of Homo sapiens.


    While the Neanderthal / Cro-Magnon stuff is probably true (I was under the impression that the question had been decided years ago - they both were around at the same time, Neanderthals died out), the second half of the article doesn't help the credibility of the first half.

    Don't the editors read the links that get submitted?

    1. Re:credibility of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come on. We've needed a good cyborg story for a while now.

      I, for one, will happily go cyborg. How about you?

    2. Re:credibility of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're an Anonymous Coward, so you're already part of the Collective. Welcome!

    3. Re:credibility of the story by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      While the Neanderthal / Cro-Magnon stuff is probably true (I was under the impression that the question had been decided years ago - they both were around at the same time, Neanderthals died out)

      That is the working theory. However I am not aware of any proof; and I fail to see how a few thousand year old mummy in a glacier could have resolved a question about Neanderthals which died out tens of thousands of years ago.

      Whatever this article implies, I'm pretty sure that no samples of Neanderthal DNA are known to science, so until we have some, the question seems open.

      As an example, suppose all the white skinned people in the world were killed off [n.b. I'm not recommending this, I'm white!]. Would that mean that the remaining population were not descended from whites? Of course not. So the question is whether Neanderthals and human ancestors could interbreed. I don't know, and I don't think anyone has any evidence either way, but one thing is for sure, I bet they tried ;-)

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    4. Re:credibility of the story by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. They extracted DNA from a Neanderthal skeleton years ago--do a Google search. The conclusion was that we are different species.

    5. Re:credibility of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> You're an Anonymous Coward, so you're already part of the Collective. Welcome!

      Why do you resist us? We only wish to raise the quality of life for all Slashdotters. You will be obsolete in the new order.

      Identity is irrelevant.
      Moderation is irrelevant.

      From this day forward, you will read all comments at [-1/Flat/Oldest First]. You will all become one with the AC.

  3. Duh? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    I also thought that the neanderthal/modern man relation had been resolved awhile ago... though I also know that a lot of people still think the neanderthals are our 'ancestors'.

    Then again, I know a few people who think heavier objects 'fall faster' than lighter objects... so I guess you can't take knowledge for granted.

    Oh well. I suppose this is just purely scientific confirmation of what archeologists/paleontologists had figured out from physical evidence. Chalk up another victory for science!

    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Duh? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2

      If I'm remembering right, there have been recent studies that indicate we do have some genes associated with Neatherals. The idea isn't that we're so much extracted from the speices as there was interbreeding between Cromagnon and Neanderthals. (If they could interbreed, they almost certainly did. That's a fundemental truism for whenever two such species meet.)
      One finding I do definately recall (as I just read about it the other night) is that the genes for red hair seem to come to us from Neanderthals.
      The moral might just be that genetics and human evolution isn't nice and simple. Perhaps we should stop seeking the sound-bite sized answers (we are/are not descended from X) and accept that things are inherently more complicated.

    2. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then world is not simply Black and White, Right verus Wrong! And that would just totally hose the world. At least for right-wingers ;)

  4. Correction by master_xemu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just for referance there is no such thing as "Cro-Magnon Man". Cromagnon was a site in France where modern human remains were found. Cromagnon man is simply Homo sapien sapien, my wife is an Anthropologist and jumps all over me when I use the term "Cro-Magnon".

    1. Re:Correction by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

      , my wife is an Anthropologist and jumps all over me when I use the term "Cro-Magnon"

      Hey, whatever works to keep the romance alive, I guess.

    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anthropologists also make documentaries where they use the term cro-magnon, but they are quick to point out that cro-magnon are "Modern humans" ... I think for lay people they didn't want to get into taxonomy. If you're a lay person, maybe your anthropologist wife should lay off!

  5. So then how do you explain my hairy knuckles? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Convergent evoloution? Or is the story about my great grandpa and the circus monkey true?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  6. Old News by JBCybernautics · · Score: 3, Funny


    Obviously we aren't all reading the right literature.

    It's already been discovered that our ancestors co-existed with cro-magnon man rather than evolved from him. In fact, we likely caused his extinction. We're just lucky we got off the leaf-currency system before we deforested the entire planet and did ourselves in.

    "That's traffic control."

    1. Re:Old News by floydigus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank Christ we don't use cellulose based currency any more.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    2. Re:Old News by Jru+Hym · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bought super bowl tickets that were printed on some sort of cracker.

      --
      This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
    3. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did anyone ever find those documentary tapes, by the way? As a film student, I am interested in whether or not they did in fact manage to capture the "lonliness of command", etc.

  7. The article was unclear on a point... by medcalf · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, are we then descended from cyborgs, or was that an untenable offshoot of the main branch of human evolution?

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  8. Phew! by IainHere · · Score: 4, Funny

    This news should really help my forthcoming paternity suit.

    Thanks slashdot!

  9. Was the Enterprise-E involved? by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    Obviously, it was an advance scout from the Borg collective.

    --
    For great justice.
  10. Pravda apparently no longer means truth by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, I didn't realize that pravda had turned into a national inquirer type of paper.
    The funny thing about this article is how it starts out plausible enough, albiet not newsworthy, much like a decent troll, before it gets into the nitty gritty of UFO's and cyborg Neanderthals as monitoring devices.
    Another headline is "America Wants to Use Biological Weapons on Iraq"
    The truly sad part is that there are many people in the world who believe nonsense like this.
    p.s. Why is this in "science" category instead of "it's funny, laugh"? Did Hemos fall for the troll?

    1. Re:Pravda apparently no longer means truth by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More interesting tidbits from Pravda:

      "Japan didn't capitulate in 1945"

      "Therefore, what kind of anomalous events can be dangerous for planes? They are UFOs, balls of lightening, meteorites, energy fields that humans know nothing about, or even unknown forms of life in the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere."

      "I hope so much for Vladimir Putin now. It seems to me that he is like Joseph Stalin. I treat Stalin with respect, and I think that he was a very wise leader."

      "Fire ants, Solenopsis Invicta (invincible), are ready to destroy any and all enemies, regardless of size[...] At first, it seems that they just idle around their ant hill. However, this idling time might be used to plan well-coordinated attacks."

      "Bin Laden Gives Credit Where Credit's Due - Bush and Western leaders to blame for deaths of Moscow and Bali terrorism victims"

      --
      For great justice.
    2. Re:Pravda apparently no longer means truth by Zordak · · Score: 2
      "Fire ants, Solenopsis Invicta (invincible), are ready to destroy any and all enemies, regardless of size[...] At first, it seems that they just idle around their ant hill. However, this idling time might be used to plan well-coordinated attacks."
      These guys have obviously never been to S. Texas, where the well-coordinated attacks have already begun, and humans counter-attack with everything from lawnmowers to diazinon to gasoline. It's a civil war, and the prize is the finest piece of Real Estate in the world. DEATH TO THE FIRE ANTS!!! MAY THEY ALL ROT IN HELL WITH THE COCKROACHES!!!
      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  11. Ahh, Pravda.ru by drdink · · Score: 2

    If Stalin knew that Pravda.ru would be around so long, I think he'd be proud. His propaganda machine has outlived him and continues on even today. It is always fun to check the top stories at Pravda.ru and see what the "Russian slant" is. Best headline I see on there right now: Where Is Stalin When You Need Him?.

    --
    Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  12. Well said. by Ashurbanipal · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I know a few people who think heavier objects 'fall faster' than lighter objects...
    Probably because they typically do; in everyday situations the lighter object usually will have aerodynamic properties that the heavier object does not. Weight to surface area (as well as shape) comes into play here.

    Intelligent people observe their surroundings, and one might well notice that a stapler falling off a desk hit the floor before the sheet of paper did.

    Intelligent people also test hypotheses; but most of us do not have easy access to a large vacuum chamber.

    Not everyone has the advantage of a proper education, so your comment that "you can't take knowledge for granted" is right on the money.

    I think homo-sap-sap ate homo-neanderthal.
  13. Did anyone even read this?!? by image · · Score: 1, Redundant
    What?

    Quote from the article:


    Currently, we have no scientific data proving that aliens come to Earth from other planets. However, the first idea that comes to mind is that UFOs are from other planets. If we rely upon many statements and the evidence of UFOs or extraterrestrial visits to Earth, we can consider our planet as a space colony. And different space centers are very active here. They send their robots, cyborgs, and hominids to the Earth to collect information and materials, to perform experiments on human beings, including even complex surgical operations. In many cases, these operations resulted in mutilations later treated as abnormalities by pathologoanatomists and archeologists. The experiments were evidently performed with a view to create new cloned creatures. These facts allow one to say talk about the alien origin of Homo sapiens.


    I don't know whether the poster linked to the wrong site, but this sure as hell isn't about scientists proving anything about pre-historic DNA.
    1. Re:Did anyone even read this?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to pick on you, but i see this all of the time..

      QUOTE is a verb.
      QUOTATION is a noun.

  14. Pravda is a tabloid. by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    Read down in the article. They start talking about some 4000 year old ice mummy that was possibly a 'cyborg'. That paper will print any tripe.

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  15. This article only proves by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

    That the Slashdot editors really really do not read the articles they link to.

    For Instance


    The mummy isnt from a Pharaoh grave; it was discovered in a block of eternal ice in a mountainous area in Central Mongolia in 1995. It was in the ice within four thousand years. The mummy had long, red hair reaching its shoulders and massive tattooed forearms.

    What is especially interesting, it is supposed that some of the internals and several parts of the brain were made of unknown artificial materials. It may be that they were created in a step-wise manner in the course of very complicated operations; the operations were performed on a more perfect level compared with todays operations. Scientists Justin Manners (the USA) and Kent Jennings (England) studied the mummy; they say that the surgical manipulation performed on the mummy was designed for to create a perfect cyborg, which could carry out observations and collect data. The scientists say that during its life, the mummy could have been a cyborg, a creature made by a combination of features of a robot and a hominoid. The notion hominid denotes a representative of the primates class, which includes fossil man as well as contemporary people (dont mix it with a humanoid, an extraterrestrial resembling a human by its appearance).


    Yeah right and Al Gore invented the internet.

    --
    >
    1. Re:This article only proves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      People say that, but I have yet to get a goatse.cx (or a mirror of same) link published... I submit one or two every single day under a variety of topics.

    2. Re:This article only proves by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      People say that [the /. eds don't check links], but I have yet to get a goatse.cx (or a mirror of same) link published.

      The trick is to set up a site the uses a SLOW redirect - say five minutes. The eds go check the site and it looks fine - then close the windows or use their back button - never the wiser about the redirect. But when the article is submitted a good many users will click on the link and leave it open past the five minutes - certain to get a few gasps from the co-workers walking by when the goats.cx page comes up.

      Alternatively, you could get a real story accepted that points to a page you control, then once it gets posted - change it to a goats.cx mirror or instant redirect.

  16. Re:Duh2? by budalite · · Score: 2

    Having neanderthals for ancestors is either not possible for any of the people any of the time or it explains some of the behavior of some of the people all of the time, some of the behavior of all of the people some of the time, or all of the behavior of some of the people all of the time. :P (That or only we wonderful people have neanderthl genes. :{)||

  17. Hold on there, mao. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Insightful


    > I figured that the lack of a genetic relationship between the two species was already well known

    "We are not related" and "lack of a genetic relationship" greatly overstate the case. Humans "have a genetic relationship" with all species, and exceed 98% identity (depending on the way you measure it) even with chimps, and we are much more closely related to the Neanderthals than to the chimps.

    What scientists actually say is that we are not descended from the Neanderthals.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  18. Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by portege00 · · Score: 2

    That's interesting. In Portugal a few years back, a Neaderthal-Homo Sapien hybrid child skeleton was found.

    http://www.freeessays.cc/db/4/alx57.shtml

    If a known hybrid exists, it is highly unlikely that absolutely no Neaderthal DNA made its way into modern homo sapien DNA. However, it may be extremely limited and require widespread analysis to indicate where modern Neaderthal lineage may still exist.

    I don't trust this story because of the bottom, though. If an ancient cyborg was found, it would rock the foundation of modern religion and evolutionary science.

    --
    Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
    1. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by Lars+Arvestad · · Score: 4, Informative
      From what I understand, the current knowledge is well captured by a quote from Archaeology:
      If Neandertals made a significant genetic contribution to modern humans, similarities should exist between DNA of Neandertals and that of people from Europe, where the Neandertals persisted the longest. Pääbo and his colleagues compared the Neandertal DNA to that from five modern populations, but it proved no closer to DNA from modern Europeans than to that from four other groups. While this does not rule out the possibility of Neandertal and modern human mixing, it suggests that the Neandertal genetic contribution to modern gene pools, if any, was small.
      Svante Pääbo is a respected expert on ancient DNA, and was the first (whose student...) sequenced Neandertal DNA.
      --
      Reality or nothing.
    2. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >

      Assuming anyone was willing to believe it.
      And that it got sufficient exposure.
      And that enough intelligent people and scientists were unwilling to lie and discredit it.

      Not to say that it is true.

    3. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by DeanAsh · · Score: 1

      Hey, horses and donkeys can produce offspring, but they aren't fertile. This hybrid of which you speak might not be either.

      --
      What is the shortest sig that cannot be expressed in fewer than 20 words?
    4. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by R.Caley · · Score: 2
      Hey, horses and donkeys can produce offspring, but they aren't fertile.

      Have you seen this story of the mule giving birth?

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    5. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by elakazal · · Score: 1

      It seems unlikely for one very simple reason...why would some one of another species (or subspecies, I suppose) be attractive to humans? Granted there are currently those few people who get into things like sex with farm animals, and most likely the prehistoric equivalents of them would have probably had no problem with Neandertal's, the vast majority would simply not been interested. Sexual attractiveness, while governed somewhat by cultural ideas, is pretty deeply rooted in biology, and the fact is that if a Neanderthal woman wouldn't do the trick for me or you, it probably wouldn't for Cro-Magnon man either. In general, people are considered more attractive the closer they are to average in various biometric measures...even the hottest Neanderthal chick in the world would not have even approached that. So while hybrids may have occurred if the two populations were in contact, and may have even been fertile (which seems possible, since despite not being directly related, the genetic relationship is really quite close), the resulting hybrid is still going to be ugly, by both Neanderthal and Homo sapiens sapiens standards, and not really likely to contribute to the gene pool. Not to mention quite likely unhealthy to begin with.

    6. Re:Hard Evidence Suggests Otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Neandertals made a significant genetic contribution to modern humans, similarities should exist between DNA of Neandertals and that of people from Europe, where the Neandertals persisted the longest.

      Well, then how else would you explain the French ?

  19. Cracked by Odinson · · Score: 2
    I thought for sure the server was cracked post Slashdoting and the story rewritten as a joke.

    Then I saw the other posts here.

    I'm actually surprised that hasn't happened yet.

  20. random fact: neanderthal pronunciation by honold · · Score: 1

    scientists tend to pronounce it 'knee-anne-der-TALL'

    1. Re:random fact: neanderthal pronunciation by Fryed · · Score: 1

      Time to see if I remember any of my German classes correctly. If something I post in here is wrong, please feel free to correct me (and knowing /., I'm sure someone will)

      This is because the "thal" in Neanderthal comes from the German word "thal", meaning valley. German does not pronounce a "th" sound like English does, so the th becomes kind of an aspirated t.

      So where did the name Neanderthal come from? Glad you asked! Back in the, um, past (I obviously didn't pay too much attention in German class), a German named Neumann owned a valley of some sort. He and some friends decided to try their hand at a little archaeology, which was quite popular at the time. Lo and behold, they find this weird looking skeleton. To come up with a name for the creature, Herr Neumann took his last name, converted it into Latin (Neu mann (German) = New man (English) = Neo+ander (Latin, I think)), and tacked on the word for valley at the end, so the name is a hybrid of Latin and German, Neanderthal

  21. Dianetics 2.0 by Jru+Hym · · Score: 1

    Hubbard is at it again. Now the aliens landed and made cyborgs out of our ancestral cousins. I bet Ash went back and killed the cyborgs making way for our rise to dominance. "Alright you hairy Gates wannabes, this is my boom stick!"

    --
    This lobster was alive when it hit the frothy, boiling water.
  22. Clan of the Cave Monkey by happyDave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article works in the same idiom as the Weekly World News...same tone, same approach to information. Referring to most of the people as simply "scientists," even calling them "famous scientists" at the end of the article. Real journalists don't quote people like this. Real journalists get information from multiple sources. And real journalists don't suddenly start talking about cyborgs and aliens in the middle of an ostensibly serious article. Is this a translation of a Russian article? Is the language used as bad in the original Russian, or is this written in English by someone for whom English is a second language?

    "Neanderthal man...was considered to be in the intermediate position between the pithecanthropus and the modern human." Not by most anthropologists. Neanderthal man (Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis--HSN) was considered to have died out about 30,000 years ago. "Died out" as in "leaving no descendents," or "not able to be called the ancestor of jack squat in modern times." They thrived for about 200,000 years. Homo Sapiens Sapiens--HSS--appeared 120,000 years ago. So, for about 90,000 years HSS and HSN shared space.

    For those who read the Clan of the Cave Bear series, the first book is about a HSS girl raised by a tribe of HSN.

    The Neanderthals were the first group to display abstract thought. They buried their dead, they had rituals, they drew abstract symbols in their artwork. They were not nearly as dumb as previously thought.

    There are 2 theories about HSN: that HSS came "out of Africa" and killed/displaced HSN, or that modern HSS are descended from HSN and other hominids in Europe and Asia.

    Actually, it occurs to me that all that I wrote about journalists above really relates to editors. This wasn't posted on slashdot as a joke. This was posted under the category of "science," not humor. It doesn't belong in this category at all. It's a joke that the slashdot editors decided to let this one through.

    More useful information can be found from lots of other places:

    Slashdot is never going to be a "breaking news" site. It's a news consolidation site. Don't try to beat everyone out the door with the news when it isn't really news. Check those sources, guys.
    1. Re:Clan of the Cave Monkey by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Real journalists have never worked at Pravda. That it's become a sensationalist rag rather than a Soviet-government-mouthpiece rag might be a surprise, but it's always been a rag wonderfully suited to wrapping fish.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  23. Re:So then how do you explain my hairy knuckles? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Jacking off too much

  24. Could be a 'mule' by The+Famous+Druid · · Score: 2

    Hybrids between closely related species are not uncommon but they're often infertile (mules are the best known example).

    These hybrids, of course, would not have any living descendants.

    --
    Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur (anything said in Latin sounds important)
  25. I object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a member of the dwindling ethnic minority commonly called "Neanderthals", I find this whole thing objectionable. That my distant cousins, the self-important Cromagnons, who in their audacity refer to themselves as homosapiens, or homosapienssapiens or homosapienssapienssapiens or homohypersapiens or whatever only shows your vast and unending ego. In fact, we Neanderthals had computers before you could even form complete sentences. Our Windows NT, (Neanderthal Technology) has been around forever, but only recently have you managed to cludge together computers capable of taking advantage of it's advanced performance and vast feature set.

    In your popular media, however, we are portrayed as barely walking erect, our hairy, apelike knuckles dragging along in the dirt, occasionally grunting to each other in greeting. This stereotyping must cease! We are descended from the same microscopic, protoplasmic primordial globule you are, stop saying it's not true. Look, you made Uhhhg cry! You cruel little hairless, smooth-bodied creatures!

  26. Seriously, though... about the mummy. by TimWeigel · · Score: 1

    I just had to do some Google searches on the 'cyborg' mummy, and I actually found a neat article about it. It's interesting to note that these mummies have been found in Xinjiang for over a hundred years, but mostly disregarded until recently. According to DNA testing, they share common ancestry with modern Europeans, and the famous European 'iceman' Ötzi, found in a glacier on the Austrian-Italian border. Kinda sets the history of the area on its' ear, really. The article is a neat read.

    1. Re:Seriously, though... about the mummy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time travelers. It's obviously time travelers. I need my dried frog pills.