Time Warner Properties May Only Be Available Through AOL
ryman writes "According to MSNBC, Time Warner is considering making its online content available without charge only to AOL subscribers. Sounds like a desperate move to redeem AOL, but this will have to take on a big toll on its online readership."
and another one that's doing poorly.
I know! I'll bind them together at the hip like siamese twins! That will make them both look and function so much better! Ya, that's the ticket!
Stupid marketing dweebs.
If you post it, they will read.
This smacks of other brillaint ideas like MSN's exclusive access to Viacom's Star Trek web site a few years back. I guess the target demographic for their magazines are people unable to use the internet. Maybe it should be aOL tIME wARNER?
I'm sure that their competitors will be happy to have me read their content.
What? Time Warner bought all their competition? Hmmmm...
Not to use AOL.
No more free 'People' or 'Entertainment Weekly' online? Heavens- my life will be incomplete!!
You've got bankruptcy!
Trolling is a art,
Isn't that an oxymoron?
t_t_b
I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
AOL has the expertise to pull it off seemlessly. Here's a example AOL preference box. It just needs a little extention to make it applicable for multimedia:
http://www.godslayer.org/pics/computers_2.html
Someone's probably already noted this, but I don't think this sounds like such a bad idea. Maybe it'll be the move that kills off (as we know it) AOL-Time Warner in one fell swoop?
--Jeremy
Jesus was a liberal
If the performance of toolbar.aol.com is any indication of what we can expect from "members only" aol sites, they should pay me for wasting my time :-)
Every aol/tw site hangs trying to get that worthless toolbar to download.
Barnaby