Slashdot Mirror


Terra Soft Reveals Linux/PPC Hardware Solution

Gentu writes "OSNews features an article revealing a new product from Terra Soft, makers of the popular PPC Linux distribution Yellow Dog Linux, which effectively enables YDL to run on its own platform. Terra Soft is offering a motherboard and a complete PC based on the 600MHz G3 (G4 is also planned). This is of course still PPC, but it ain't a Mac. However, the article hints that it might be technically possible to run Mac OS and Mac OS X via Mac-On-Linux." Prices start at about $500, with 1U rackmounts starting at $870.

28 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. What's the point? by g4dget · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For the same amount of money, you get PC hardware that is considerably faster. And Linux on x86 runs a lot more software than Linux on PPC.

    In fact, probably even the new EPIA-M board is a better deal for many applications; the EPIA-M costs $160 with processor, uses a 933MHz C3 (Pentium compatible), is tiny, and uses comparatively little power. And if you buy one of those, you don't even give money to the other monopoly.

    1. Re:What's the point? by jmu1 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      One acronym: DRM.

      It's coming, and in hardware form. These companies are small enough to give a rat's ass about what it's customers want. Next time I purchase hardware for myself... it's going to be PPC.

    2. Re:What's the point? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've got an EPIA here, running @ 800Mhz, and a G3 at 400, the G3 kicks the bejeezus out of the EPIA hands-down. You can't compare apples and oranges here. Also, GCC isn't NEARLY well suited for obscure chips like the C3 as it is for the mature and very-well documented PPC series (remember, Apple and IBM are both running on breeds of PPC and both have been investing in GCC/Open Source development on the platform). VIA isn't shelling out millions to get GCC to produce highly optimized code on the C3 CPU.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    3. Re:What's the point? by MissMyNewton · · Score: 4, Insightful


      And Linux on x86 runs a lot more software than Linux on PPC

      And using that logic, why bother with Linux when Windows run LOTS LOTS LOTS LOTS LOTS more software than Linux on X86...

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    4. Re:What's the point? by g4dget · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no DRM in Linux running on any existing PC motherboard. When/if hardware enforced DRM comes, we can deal with it then--an old non-DRM PC will be no more or less of an oddity at that point than an old non-DRM PPC.

    5. Re:What's the point? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      One acronym: DRM. It's coming, and in hardware form.

      I don't worry so much about DRM / TCPA / Palladium as I used to.

      Why? Governments all over the world (outside the US) are jumping on the open source bandwagon. Other countries outside the US will make hardware and have local software development efforts. The only way that hardware DRM can really be truly effective is to get all hardware to use it. Since this appears like it will never happen, then DRM hardware efforts will be defeated or ignored. In either case, you won't have to be tormented with DRM hardware.

      If China / India / Japan, etc. make their own PC's, and support Linux, then there is no way all (any?) of these PC's will have hardware drm. In fact crap like this could perhaps accellerate Microsoft's downfall.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  2. Re:OS X by anothermortal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Macs are only expensive if you buy the Dual Processor models, or the UberCool G4 Titanium Powerbook (portable space heater). Recall the recent price drop on the iBooks? The low-end model is only $999. Add a bit for some extra RAM, and you have a nice, decent Mac OSX box for home. iBooks are inexpensive, and I believe, a good deal when compared to similar priced PC laptops.

  3. From the MOL FAQ by pwagland · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Q: Does MOL run on non-Apple hardware?

    A: It does. MOL runs for instance on the Pegasos board, the Teron board and on AmigaOne hardware. In short, MOL should run on any PowerPC hardware (with the except of 601-based systems). However, the EULA of MacOS prohibits its usage on non-Apple hardware (it is of course perfectly legal to use MOL to boot a second Linux though).

    This means it might be technically possible to run MACOS on this thing, but it is also technically illegal!
  4. not an acronym by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hate to nitpick... but it's "Mac", not "MAC".

    Mac is short for Macintosh, a series of computers sold by Apple Computer Inc.

    1. Re:not an acronym by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are the reason people hate geeks, going around acting like something this insignificant is worthy of any sort of comment.

      You say that like it's a bad thing...

  5. FreeBSD? by nsayer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FreeBSD 5.0 will have a PPC port. I wonder if it will run on this hardware? I imagine the only requirement is an OpenFirmware BIOS for booting.

    1. Re:FreeBSD? by nsayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only drivers that would need work would be for on-board devices. Presumably it has PCI slots, and any PCI devices supported on FreeBSD x86 should work just fine on any other platform (modulo bugs). So what sort of on-board devices do these things have? Anything more exotic than ATA, USB or Firewire controllers (which are likely to be well supported)?

  6. Distros and Costs? by Komarosu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting here that YDL are trying to "pimp" it as there platform, but with other PPC linux distros making there way along then it does give you a nice choice for a cheap linux desktop solution.

    Yes it might be cheaper to buy x86, but what about these people who want to experiment on new platforms? Also the reason why x86 is cheaper is due to mass demand, i imagin that if they get a lot of sales of these PPC mobos then the prices will drop

    I personally is very interested in getting one of these just to experiance PPC, strange as it may sound but ive never really touched a PPC based platform in my life! (dont ask me how to modify BIOS settings or whatever on a Mac :))

    --

    "What do you mean you have no ice? Do you expect me to drink this coffee hot?" - Random Customer, Clerks
    1. Re:Distros and Costs? by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Informative

      (dont ask me how to modify BIOS settings or whatever on a Mac :))

      OpenFirmware, baby! Hope you brushed up on FORTH! :)

      Hit google, lots of stuff on OF out there, it's sort of a standard.

  7. Specs by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's the IBM PowerPC 750CXe.

    This is the slightly older version of the PPC 750 "G3". This 750 CXe model has 256 KB of on-die L2 cache and is fabbed at a .18 micron process.

    The newer 750 FX model (as used in the current Apple iBooks) has 512 KB of on-die L2 cache and is fabbed at .13 micron with all of the buzzwords (silicon-on-insulator, etc).

    I belive this board uses PC133 RAM. 133 MHz x 4.5

  8. The "new Amiga" ;) by Seehund · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not mentioned in the story, but this board is the Teron CX, which is also distributed under the licensed trademark "AmigaOne G3-SE".

    There's also a model with the CPU on an exchangeable module, called Teron PX (or "AmigaOne XE" when it's marketed to AmigaOS users). Hopefully we'll see Terrasoft and others selling Teron PX as well, which offers G4 and 750FX (a newer, faster G3 design) CPUs.

    Due to a seriously fscked up compulsory licensing policy for AmigaOS, that OS will however not be sold separate from licensed hardware and be allowed to be installed on Teron boards from vendors who are not licensed by Amiga, Inc., like Terrasoft.

    P.S. Why is this story under "Apple"? MOL runs fine on these, but come on!

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  9. Re:OS X by Gropo · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm looking at a whole slew of closed PowerMac auctions on ebaY... 800's go for around $1200 on average... You can even buy Apple logic boards for a little over $120 and roll your own:

    $120 Logic Board

    $80 Hard drive

    $499 800 Mhz PowerPC daughtercard (2Mb DDR L3 cache!)

    $130 Power Supply

    $50 SDRAM

    Total: $879

    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  10. Use it as a DMZ box. by Mr_Icon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since it's a PPC, skr1pt k1dd1ez will have a whole lotta trouble trying to crack it with cut-and-paste x86 rootkits. Of course, it will not stop a knowledgeble attacker and is not at all a substitute for applying errata in a timely fashion, but it's still a significant plus in my book. And if you use YDL, it will be nearly identical in every feature to your x86 Red Hat Linux boxen.

    I can totally see it running as a firewall/external webserver/DNS server box. Of course, granted that TerraSoft mobos aren't POS. Only time and wide use will tell.

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    1. Re:Use it as a DMZ box. by AJWM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if by "obscurity" you mean "unusualness". There's nothing obscure ("hidden") about the software running on the boxes or the architecture of the boxes.

      For an analogy, there's nothing obscure about how standard door locks work. A skilled locksmith can pick the lock whether it's a Yale or a Schlage. A "script kiddie" with an automatic pick that only works on Yale locks (unlikely, but give me this for the sake of analogy), however, will be stopped by a Schlage.

      Somebody capable of creating a rootkit for x86 could probably create one for Sparc or PPC or MIPS, although he might first have to study the architecture and acquire the hardware to test with. Given the ubiquity of x86 systems, however, he's more likely to spend that time finding some other x86 exploit.

      --
      -- Alastair
  11. No more boot chip in MacOS by Bobartig · · Score: 4, Informative

    You DO know that MacOS no longer uses a hardware bootrom, right? And that you CAN copy the bootROM off of any MacOSX install.

    MacOnLinux actually comes with documentation telling you how to do this, since some people can have trouble getting to bootrom to load off the OSX partition, so they copy it to their linux partition, then tell MOL to load it from there.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  12. Re:OS X by Archie+Steel · · Score: 4, Funny

    And, by posting this comment, you voided any moderation you might have done to other comments for this story...

    --

    Reminder: find a new sig
  13. Re:OS X by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You do realize this is $500 just for the bare motherboard? And it's a G3 600 at that? You'd be better off getting a G3 off of ebay or a Mac reseller site like MacResQ. (I gave that as an example it's the one I can remember.) They currently have a G3/400 blue&white with 128 meg RAM, 6G hard disk, and DVD-ROM for $530. Lose a few megahertz, get RAM and a hard drive for $30 more. They also have various G4/450 systems for $900.

    And you don't have to wait until January for them to be released, either.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  14. Re:why would you want to? by nsayer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    why the urge to stick it in some nasty beige box?

    Because it would cost less.

    Of course, that presumes your time and hacking effort is free, but for most /.ers, I suspect it is.

  15. FYI by wilburdg · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As an employee of Terra Soft I thought I'd let you know a little tidbit of information. Our server, which is handling the /.ing just fine (and has an uptime of 248 days) is actually running 200MHz slower than these Boxer systems. It is an old Beige G3 tower running at 400MHz with 640megs of ram, of course running Yellow Dog, and it has handled a good deal of /. submissions, without so much as blinking.

    processor : 0
    cpu : 740/750
    temperature : 28-31 C (uncalibrated)
    clock : 400MHz
    revision : 2.2 (pvr 0008 0202)
    bogomips : 801.17

    machine : Power Macintosh
    motherboard : AAPL,PowerMac G3 MacRISC
    L2 cache : 1024K unified pipelined-syncro-burst
    memory : 640MB
    pmac-generation : OldWorld
  16. Re:Versus orginal MAC hardware. by Pretender · · Score: 3, Informative

    I ran OS 9 (Classic) under Mac-on-Linux for some time. Anything that didn't require direct hardware access worked pretty much flawlessly; MOL emulates the essential hardware (video, hard drive, input devices, NIC) pretty well. But you wouldn't be able to for example use OpenGL apps. Photoshop ran great but it would never talk to your USB scanner. In this regard it's just a little bit more limited than Classic mode under OS X, though. I never ran OS X under MOL but I assume the limitations are similar. The vast majority of things that run under OS 9 just worked.

  17. Re:OS X by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I call bullshit. Show me where and what you got for $250.

    Also note that your athlon system did not come with:

    A) A nice 12 inch LCD display

    B) 4 hours standard batery life

    C) OS X

    D) Firewire

    E) Gigabit ethernet

    F) An easy to carry portable form

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  18. not really by g4dget · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I didn't say that the EPIA-M was as fast as the G3. It beats the PPC board on other dimensions that you might care about (price, power consumption, size, compatibility, I/O ports). I mention it because, clearly, if you pay $500 for a 400MHz G3, speed can't be your primary criterion anyway. If you are going for speed, get a low-cost P3 or AMD, still for less than the PPC system.

    In any case, I actually doubt that "G3 kicks the bejeezus out of the EPIA". I have both an iMac and an 800MHz EPIA, and I actually run compute-intensive stuff on them.. A 400MHz G3 is probably no faster than a 400MHz P3, and a 933MHz C3 probably is somewhere around a 300MHz P3 since the 800MHz C3 comes in at around the same speed or faster as a 250MHz P3 in the benchmarks I tried.

    As for gcc maturity, the C3 is Pentium compatible. Linux just runs on it. If it's not as well optimized, that only means that there is more room for improvement over the above comparison; PPC optimization for gcc looks like a done deal--it won't get much better. What I do know from personal experience is that "porting" to the EPIA or any desktop PC is much easier than to the iMac/PPC: again, code just runs, while on PPC, you face byte order issues and x86 assembly doesn't work (e.g., for MPEG codecs).

  19. Re:OS X by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But this solution is more expensive than the Apple hardware!

    $495 is for MoBo and Processor. Add HD, Optical storage, video board, monitor, RAM, keyboard, and speakers, and you're the $799 iMac territory (which includes 600MHz PowerPC G3, 128MB SDRAM, 40GB Ultra ATA drive, Rage 128 graphics, 15" monitor, CD-ROM Drive, 10/100BASE-T Ethernet, 56K internal modem, optical mouse, quality keyboard, speakers, AppleWorks, iTunes, iMovie, and iPhoto.)