Slashdot Mirror


New Mad Max Film

IceDiver writes "According to Google News Mel Gibson has signed up for a new Mad Max film "Fury Road". His salary? A whopping $25,000,000.00 Apparently the script has been in the works for 3 years and is highly polished. As a big fan of all 3 Mad Max films, I am looking forward to this one! "

74 of 510 comments (clear)

  1. profit ? by a7244270 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if they will make any money.

    According to the article they are going to spend about 180 mil to make MM4, and MM1,2,3 combined made less than 70 mil.

    But then again, these days is seems like all you need ia a hot chick and some special effects to rake it in - plot optional.

    1. Re:profit ? by On+Lawn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From an email I recieved this morning...

      The trilogy of "Mad Max" pictures, for all their iconic value, amounted to a rather slender box office, grossing only $69 million in total domestically. That's partly because the 1979 original, released by Village Roadshow, Orion
      Pictures and AIP, was hardly seen Stateside at all. The franchise only grew significant with "Mad Max: The Road Warrior."

    2. Re:profit ? by nakedbonzai · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as Kevin Costner isn't starring in it, it'll make money.

    3. Re:profit ? by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah, but are those numbers inflated? Movies cost more now than they did then.

      The original Mad Max was made on a very low budget. It was the highest profit to cost ratio movie until Blair Witch. So cheap that the only actor to wear real leather was Mel Gibson - the other characters had to do with fake leather.

      (All from the pop-up-video type notes on the DVD.)

    4. Re:profit ? by kizarny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Waterworld made money, over $70 million in its first domestic box office run, before overseas export, video release and licensing. It's a seldom stated film industry secret but... they all eventually make money.

    5. Re:profit ? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, very few make money, in some magic way they all just barely break even...

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  2. 25 million? by PanBanger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess we know who run Bartertown.

    1. Re:25 million? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon people! What is this "25 million" and "$25,000,000.00" stuff I'm seeing here? This is News for Nerds for chrissake! Mel's salary will be $2.5e7. Get it right. :)

      GMD

    2. Re:25 million? by delfstrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You must be a scientist type, then. An engineer would say 25.7M (Example, for ten megapascals an engineer writes 10 MPa, not 1.0E7 Pa)

    3. Re:25 million? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be a private sector engineer, then. For ten kilometers per hour a NASA Mars probe engineer would say 10MPH.

  3. With that salary... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This film will be about as good as number 3. Which was about as good as WaterWorld.

    The low budget Mad Max 1 & 2 were great, even though 2 was over dubbed in American.

    1. Re:With that salary... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Beyond Thunderdome was the easily the best Mad Max film. Hell, it's probably in the top 5 sf films of all time. Yep, 2001, Star Wars, Thunderdome, that sounds about right.

    2. Re:With that salary... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah, Road Warrior was a 2 hour fight scene; MM3 was a cinematic, multidimensional view of the postapocalypse. And Star Wars is scifi; not hard scifi, but scifi.

  4. YYYEEEEESSSSSSSS! by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is perhaps the coolest thing to ever happen!!


    "Two days ago I saw a vehicle that'd haul that tanker. You want to get out of here, you talk to me."

    "Damage? You should see the damage, bronze! Metal damage! Brain damage! You listening bronze??!"

    Ahh. I feel better now...

    1. Re:YYYEEEEESSSSSSSS! by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Damage? You should see the damage, bronze! Metal damage! Brain damage! You listening bronze??! I am the Nightrider. I'm a fuel injected suicide machine! I am the rocker! I am the roller! I am the metal controller! I'm the nightrider baby!" ... "I am the chosen one! The mighty hand of vengence sent down to stike the unroadworthy!! ... Step right up chum, and watch the kid lay down the rubber road right to freedom!!!"

      "The chain in those handcuffs is high tensile steel. It'd take ten minutes to hack through it with this. Now. If you're lucky, you could hack through your ankle in five minutes."

      I hope Johnny The Kid shows up in MM4 with one foot missing. That would kick ass.

      And yes, I DO need to get out more!

  5. Yeah but will they be clever... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    enough to make it look as low budget as the first one? Paying Mel 25 million they may not have a choice! :-)

  6. And of course... by killthiskid · · Score: 3, Informative
  7. Coming soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    Mad Max 4:Beyond the Nursing Home

  8. Re:What? by chuckfirment · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You admit to being a "fan" of Thunder Dome? Blarg."

    I definately admit to it. To this day I'll occasionally hear the chanting in my head, "Two men enter! One man leave!"

    Thankfully it's at completely inappropriate times like corporate meetings or trying to merge in traffic.

    Chuck Firment

  9. Geek Quote coming ... okay here it is .... by airrage · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember where you are. This is Thunderdome. Death is listening, and will take the first man who screams.

    Of course, I say Remember where you are. This is Slashdot. Mod is listening, and will take the first man who posts.

    We don't need another hero, hero, all we want is what's beyond Thunderdome!

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  10. According to Google News? by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean according to Google News by way of CNN, by way of Reuters, don't ya?

    1. Re:According to Google News? by tfreport · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This should be modded up. This was the first thing I thought about reading this article, there is no Google News in terms of reporting stories. Sure you can mention that they pointed you to the story but saying that something is acording to them is wrong.

      It has been said on Slashdot many times that Google should not be held responsible for what it links to (the whole Church of Scientology debate) but it then should also not credit for someone else's reporting. It is only the way it should be that you either always are responsible for links or you never are.

  11. Mel in a dog costume by eyeball · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one that read the title as "Furry Road?"

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
  12. MAD Max? by Scotch+Game · · Score: 4, Funny

    For $25,000,000 for the fourth movie he should go from "Mad Max" to "Old, Rich, Happy Max".

    1. Re:MAD Max? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Capital One comerial? Or new Mad Max film?
      What's in your wallet Mel?

  13. re: New Mad Max Film by jonerik · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to Google News Mel Gibson has signed up for a new Mad Max film "Fury Road".

    And it's already available at sidewalk kiosks throughout China.

  14. More apocalyptic blather? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read about the movie this morning on CNN, but I wasn't really that excited by it. The interesting part of the story arc has been exhausted, IMHO. I'm not exactly sure where this one will go, unless it is a rehash of the last two plots.

    1. Mad Max = world going to hell
    2. Road Warrior = world gone to hell
    3. Thunderdome = World gone to hell, but redeeming itself
    4. New movie = (?) Make money!

    There is some overlap (Road Warrior had an inkling of redemption at the end, but it was more explicit in Thunderdome.

    This may end up being a good action flick, but I am not seeing significant potential to do anything very new or exciting. I expect that, like Mel, we'll find out that the series is old and tired.

    guac-foo.

    1. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Telastyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Kinda like Harrison Ford and the "new" Indiana Jones movie? Or the Scooby Doo movie? Or the Star Wars prequels? Or...

      Seems like alot of Movie Execs (read: tripe) have gone from rehashing old, moderately good films, into moderate films with different names and just went straight to remaking the same damned film, this time with nostalgia!

    2. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by moosemoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its actually, "furry road" and the plot involves an aging warrior who mows down small rodents on an abandoned interstate with his flamethrowing wheel chair in order to provide food to the starving survivors of the apocalypse.

      --
      the real evil is not what people think - its how people think
    3. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Khomar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same thing with the new Terminator movie... It seems to me that Hollywood is scrambling for new ideas since their current batch of writers have run out. Meanwhile, some strange Kiwi's down south had the novel concept (no pun intended) of taking a famous piece of literature, adding massive amounts of love and care, and a heavy dose of creativity and integrity (both severely lacking in Hollywood) to make what looks to be a truly spectacular set of films on a relatively low budget ($70 million per film). Is anyone in Hollywood taking notes? If they are, are they taking the right notes? (I expect to see a slew of terrible fantasy clones released in the coming years until Hollywood once again learns the wrong lesson that fantasy films don't work...*sigh*)

      Hollywood today seems to be only capable of rehashing old ideas without any real creative imagination. I do not doubt that this creativity exists, but for some reason it is not allowed to thrive. Why is Lord of the Rings successful? There was very little involvement from the high level, Hollywood executives. They let the creative people be creative with plenty of financial backing and time to truly let them imaginations fly. It was something new and distinctive.

      Mad Max IV? When will Hollywood realize that what they need is true creativity. Throwing massive amounts of money at an old, fading idea does not equate to a great movie.


      Someday I'll think up a good sig...

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the plots are more like this:

      1. Mad Max = Max chased in his car
      2. Road Warrior = Max chased in his truck
      3. Thunderdome = Max chased in his train
      4. New movie = Max chased in his Rolls Royce

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  15. I don't know by tps12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll see it, I'm sure, but I'm skeptical as to whether the true spirit of the originals will persist. The ideas and expressions that once comprised pop culture have changed so much that the original Mad Max themes of individualist strength and moral integrity will probably be cast aside in favor of a more contemporary populist sensibility.

    By way of comparison, consider that "Popeye" had a character called Wimpy, who was addicted to hamburgers (a stand-in for alcohol in those more sensitive times). He was continuously broke, and to finance his habit was reduced to trying to con other characters out of their money ("I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today"). His crippling addiction lost him everything, even his dignity. He was not a hero, but a character to be pitied for his devotion to something so artificial and his lack of work ethic.

    Look at today's children's cartoons and you'll find nothing like Wimpy. Instead, you'll see obviously gay characters like Spongebob Squarepants, who epitomizes and glorifies chronic laziness and disrespect for authority. Even his name, "Squarepants," alludes to the angular uniforms of China's Red Army. Is it any surprise that generation Xers grow up with no work ethic and a feeling of entitlement, when they have been indoctrinated with this kind of skewed moral framework? The values expressed in the original Mad Max films are completely alien to them, and I'm not optimistic that they'll come through at all.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:I don't know by pmancini · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, Spongebob is not gay. He has a rather attractive squiril girlfriend. (how do you spell the name of that rodent???)

      While the gay-ultra-left may push for Good 'ole Spongebob to be gay, he ain't!

      Plus, who cares? The Pirate is the real star of the show!

    2. Re:I don't know by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's how I understand the spinach thing:

      Popeye was originally an adult comic strip, published for sailors out at sea. It was in something like stars and stripes, or whatever.

      Anyways, he was a charicature of 'a sailor man', and would go ashore, get drunk, pick up hookers, swear constantly, and fight anyone who crossed his path.

      Anyhow, kids would get ahold of the comic and start reading it. And, much like today (GTA3, etc) parents and do-gooders protested and whined. "Please think of the children".

      So as a gag, EC Segar decided to mock all the whiners and put a 'kid friendly' message into one of the strips - he ate his spinach and then kicked everyones ass. It stuck.

      It was a running gag to mock whiners. Eventually it became nothing more than a kids cartoon, but the spinach thing was already there.

      Besides, he doesnt suck it through a pipe.

      BTW, the "mexican loco weed" thing is an urban legend. It never happened.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:I don't know by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you begin to find cartoon squirrels attractive, maybe you should take that as a sign that you REALLY need to get out more often!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  16. Re:sheesh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was tempted to agree with you, but actually dude is younger than you might think. He's only 46. Not like, say, Harrison Ford who is 60.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  17. Let's see.... by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Original director from first film
    2. Big budget
    3. A script that's been in the works for years
    4. Beloved franchise
    5. Original actors where possible
    Sounds like it can't go wrong, right?

    Can you say The Phantom Menace?

    1. Re:Let's see.... by ggruschow · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sounds like it can't go wrong, right? Can you say The Phantom Menace?

      Uh yeah. The Phantom Menace was a major flop (where major flop is defined as the #3 highest grossing film so far.

      Seriously. Who here didn't see it?

      Now, I know you think it sucked, but I bet you went and saw Episode 2 as well, eh?

      I was too young to see Mad Max 1-3 in theaters. I'll go and see this one so long as it's rated >40% on rottentomatoes.

  18. Re:sheesh by frieked · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gonna disagree with me eh?

    That's it... 2 men enter, 1 man leave
    me and you buddy :p

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
  19. this can't be good by s.d. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the first one made in 1979, that means mel gibson will be what, 25 yrs or so older in this one. Now I realize he's only going to be 47 this coming yr, but still, it strikes me the same as making a new Indiana Jones movie at this point. It's a sequel to a movie (or series of movies) I liked a lot, but is the actor too old to portray the character? I don't want to think of Indiana Jones or Mad Max as older -- they're the guys in the originals, characters like that don't age. It's why they switch James Bond actors. You don't want to see James Bond realistically portrayed as a 60 yr old spy. He's a 30+ yr old guy kicking ass and sleeping with hot women.

    1. Re:this can't be good by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Watch the first three movies. The world ages...so do the characters. I see no paradox in revisiting the world after another 5-10 years and find that Max looks 15 years older. Youth and beauty can never beat old age and treachery, you know.

  20. Mad Max Movies FAQ by eht · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mad Max Movies FAQ is a great link for all thing's Mad Max

  21. In this episode... by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    He makes it to the shore just as Kevin Costner steps ashore from his catamaran.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:In this episode... by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! Maybe they can team up to deliver the mail....

  22. MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by GodHead · · Score: 5, Funny


    Mel will be driving a beat up station wagon, with the right turn signel flashing, 20 miles an hour under the speed limit while looking for an all-you-can-eat buffet.

    --
    Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    1. Re:MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'd be funnier if Mr. Gibson would drive around in a custom paint GMC G series van (a la A-TEAM) with trusty old Mr. T as his sidekick. Mad Max, Mr. T, helluva ebonics and a spiffy van. Can't go wrong.

  23. Yes, but Australian culture is still different by typical+geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    and as long as Kennedy shoots the films in Australia, enough of the Australian culture, with it's swaggering, hard drinking, tough individualistic nature that show in Mad Max I and II, will flavor Mad Max IV so that it can avoid the worst excesses of the namby-pamby PC culture we live in.

    True, the Aussie have had to turn in their guns, and since the Olympics in Sydney they can no longer beat and kill the blackfellas with impunity, but they're still just about the most macho sorts on earth.

    So, yes, I have high hopes for this sequel, and as a devoted Mad MAx fan, you can bet that once it's been shot, I will stay up all night scouring WinMX, edonkey and Kazaa for the divx to download.

  24. well, in that case by sydlexic · · Score: 4, Funny

    he sure looks old for his age. in close-ups he reminds me of the cigarette man.

  25. Highly Polished by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Highly Polished... yea, I know what that means. It means a committee has been hard at work f***ing up what was probably a pretty good script.

    A couple of recent script-by-committee disasters include "How the Grinch Stole Christmas", "Batman and Robin", and "The Scorpion King". Of course having one person in full control of the script isn't necessarily a good thing either as Mr. Lucas has so painfully pointed out.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  26. Walk away. Just walk away. by Bitter+Cup+O+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

    While I'd love to see a good new movie, and I hope that the script really is as polished as everyone attached is claiming, I get the feeling that the best move is to walk away.

    Of course, as soon as I turn to leave, I'll catch a crossbow bolt through the head by some mohawked buy hissing at me.

    --
    "This is your world. These are your people. You can live for yourself today, or help build tomorrow for everyone."
  27. Cloning by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    At $25m/movie....aren't we getting close to the stage where it's cheaper to have Colbians kidnap the star, steal their DNA, and for underground Japanese cloning labs to clone said star? ;-)

    Hold on....I just gave away the plot for Mel Gibson's NEXT movie!!!

    -psy

  28. AWRIGHT! by JPelorat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and he shoots Costner in the head with his shotgun pistol! I'd pay to see that!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  29. Re: New Mad Max Film by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dark Helmet:
    How can there be a cassette of Spaceballs: The Movie? We're still in the middle of making it!
    Col. Sandurz:
    That's true, sir. But, there's been a new breakthrough in home video marketing.
    Dark Helmet:
    There has?
    Col. Sandurz:
    Yes. Instant cassettes. They're out in stores before the movie is finished.

  30. Which is going to worse? by happyhippy · · Score: 3, Funny
    This or Terminator 3?

    Taking bets now.

  31. The last of the V8 Interceptors by bmajik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Road Warrior was my favorite movie from the first time i saw it (at the tender age of 5) up until "The Devil's Advocate" came out.

    Nobody in kindergarten knew what the hell i was talking about if i asked them if they needed a guy to haul this rig.

    To this day, i still want the car he had in mad max. That supercharger (albeit fake) was the coolest thing i've ever seen. And i want a gear lever with a red button on it that makes the most glorious sound i've ever heard. I had a whole section on my website about the mad max car and some guy in .au emailed me about it with lots of details and info while i was in college. There are clone mad max cars up for auction from time to time. Hopefully, when im old and loaded, i'll be able to pick up a perfect replica mad-max car, with a _working_ super charger that somehow makes that incredible whine when i engage the supercharger.

    I've actually asked a couple of tuners about that functionality, apparently it was pretty suspect. To run a boosted motor you need to run lower compression pistons to avoid predetonation, which means that when the SC was disengaged you'd be making shit for power , (although i guess technically you'd be using less gas, but the engine would be way less than optimally efficient). that makes it basically a tradeoff, theres probably some crossover point where you're actually getting better "bang for your gas" with the SC engaged than with it off.

    Also, whowever invented the wrist-gauntlet mounted mini-crossbow is a diety.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by bmajik · · Score: 3, Informative

      the problem with NOS is that its not movie authentic.

      You may remember that humongous's turbine powered truck seemed to have a NOS bottle on it that gave it the power to overtake mad max and then the quasi-gay biker used a vertical truck exhaust pipe to bash in the windshield on the interceptor, forcing max off the road and ultimately causing the car to be destroyed and his dog to be shot.

      putting NOS on a car would be like sleeping with the enemy. I don't care if it would go faster, max's car didn't have it :)

      im not sure if this should get
      +1 Funny (why do you know that shit, loser)
      or
      -1 Get A Life (why do you know that shit, loser)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    2. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by geek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Knight Rider is king of the heap, sorry

    3. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by Reziac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorta sideways, but you point up why the Mad Max films WORKED: they were true to their own internal reality. The culture was bizarre, but it was believable in its own context, and the artifacts (such as the wrist-rocket style crossbow) were well-matched in that context. The vehicles are cool because they *feel* right, not just because they looked great.

      Back when Thunderdome came out, there were dire predictions that it would be a terrible movie and how no way in hell could it live up to MM2, yadda yadda. Well, it was a different kind of movie (much as MM1 and MM2 are *very* different from one another), but it was true to its world. It *worked*. Gee, it wasn't a letdown after all.

      So I'm inclined to give MM4 the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Re:sheesh by thesophist · · Score: 5, Funny
    Great! In 20 years we will have Mad Max X: Wheelchair Warrior to look forward to...

  33. Re:According to Google News??? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Funny

    um news.google.com They have entered the world of journalism. Well not really, its just a really cool gizmo that leeches news off other sites, kinda like slashdot, except automated, and with less dupes.

    --
    Why not fork?
  34. timely! by kevin+lyda · · Score: 5, Funny

    woo-hoo! new mad max film. it would be a good idea to study it to learn how to live after bush starts a nuclear holocaust...

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  35. Other stipulations... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Funny


    I heard that in his contract on the set everyone is to refer to him as "Lord Humongous."

  36. Fake Leather? by theduck · · Score: 5, Funny

    You had fake leather? You were lucky! When I was a lad, we had to paint our bodies with hot sulfurous pitch if we wanted to even LOOK like we wore fake leather in a movie!

    --
    How can we afford to ever sleep
    So sound again
    --ebtg
    1. Re:Fake Leather? by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 5, Funny

      You had sulfurous pitch? You were lucky...

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
  37. A cool plot by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Max discovers an old crate of Viagra underneath some rubble, and heads back to Barter Town's red light district in a hurry.

  38. Where are the bristish??? by pagercam2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Patriot - American challenges the English Braveheart - Scottish challenges the English MadMax4 - Auzzies challenge the English?????

  39. This is covered with red flags... by X_Caffeine · · Score: 3

    $25m = Can you name a single movie where the lead made that kind of $$ that was actually any good? I'd rather see Guy Pearce (Memento) or Bruce Campbell get paid $1m to play Max.

    "highly polished" == script-writing by committee, always a good sign.

    "script has been in the works for 3 years" = "The first draft sucked. The second draft sucked too. 37 drafts later, we still think it might suck, but then, we're the kind of jerks who will put a script through three years worth of rewrites before shooting a lame horse."

    My suggestion for the title: "Mad Max Resurrection." I wanna be optimistic, but oh man this looks bad...

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    1. Re:This is covered with red flags... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 3, Informative
      $25m = Can you name a single movie where the lead made that kind of $$ that was actually any good? I'd rather see Guy Pearce (Memento) or Bruce Campbell get paid $1m to play Max.

      The Sixth Sense. Bruce Willis made a hell of a lot of money on that film, and it was an amazing piece of work. I think that's from having a percentage of the gross, though.

      I really don't know whether this will be any good or not, but I'm certainly willing to give it a chance. We'll see...

  40. Script? by BryanL · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Apparently the script has been in the works for 3 years and is highly polished"

    I have read childrens books to my four year old that have had more words than the first three movies combined. What can there be to polish?

  41. Re:Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about $1Million? Would it REALLY fucking cramp Mel's style? Or Tom Cruise's?

    Why are you blaming the actors? What are they supposed to do, say "No thanks, that's too much money"?

    If Mel Gibson can attract enough people to the movie to make that much money, who should get the money?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  42. Re:But how much are they paying Grace Jones!? by geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    oh god please no, no no no nooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  43. Branding by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No actor is worth $25M. It's branding, not talent. I'm surprised that Hollywood hasn't figured out a way around that problem.

    Some years ago, a friend of mine dragged me backstage at a major rock concert during setup, and I was hearing how the show had two sets of equipment and props, leap-frogging each other from city to city, with one group in setup while another was in teardown. I was talking to one of the promoter's financial people, and said, "So why not have two sets of musicians. Cats has two road companies. Barnum and Bailey Circus has two units. There have been rock groups where, over time, all the members of the band were replaced. And nobody can see those guys on stage (this was in a football stadium, and before big-screen projectors) anyway. Your costs will go up by only 20-30%, but revenue will double." He looked very thoughtful for a while.

    Someday, Clear Channel will probably pull this off.

  44. Re:Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by medscaper · · Score: 3, Funny
    who should get the money?

    The Movie execs!

    Or Hilary Rosen, if they're not around.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  45. Kraftwerk by davevr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe Kraftwerk did this a few decades ago... They were an entirely electronic band, and would give "live" performances with just automatons on stage. Good Stuff!!

    "I am the operator / with my pocket calculator"

    oops, I am indicating my age... :-(