Slashdot Mirror


New Mad Max Film

IceDiver writes "According to Google News Mel Gibson has signed up for a new Mad Max film "Fury Road". His salary? A whopping $25,000,000.00 Apparently the script has been in the works for 3 years and is highly polished. As a big fan of all 3 Mad Max films, I am looking forward to this one! "

207 of 510 comments (clear)

  1. sheesh by frieked · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and I thought he was too old for the last lethal weapon.

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:sheesh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was tempted to agree with you, but actually dude is younger than you might think. He's only 46. Not like, say, Harrison Ford who is 60.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:sheesh by frieked · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gonna disagree with me eh?

      That's it... 2 men enter, 1 man leave
      me and you buddy :p

      --

      I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
      -Xenocrates
    3. Re:sheesh by buzzdecafe · · Score: 2

      I agree, Mel's a little old to be playing Mad Max, unless that is the point of the story. There are plenty of other good Aussie stars who could carry off the role of the younger Max: Guy Pearce, Hugh Jackman, even Russell Crowe. But I'll probably see this flick, just because Road Warrior is such a good film.

    4. Re:sheesh by thesophist · · Score: 5, Funny
      Great! In 20 years we will have Mad Max X: Wheelchair Warrior to look forward to...

    5. Re:sheesh by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2

      Bah, I was at Wendy's the other day with Mel Gibson and I saw the clerk give him 10% off!!

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    6. Re:sheesh by outsider007 · · Score: 2

      You're never too old to make $25,000,000.
      I'm changing my sig in honor of mel.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    7. Re:sheesh by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      where did the whole "In Soviet Russia" thing come from, anyway?

    8. Re:sheesh by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      Then Mad Max XI: Beyond the Nursing Home

      How about Mad Max Beyond the Balding Dome? I'm not dissing Gibson. I'm a big Mad Max fan. I saw the first one as soon as it came out (hot rod AMXs were pretty funny in the US at the time). But really, Mel and I are of the age we need to drive something a little more conservative - like a beige hummer (or a Suburban, the true urban assault vehicle).

    9. Re:sheesh by Keebler71 · · Score: 2

      Three Mad Max films? Damn, I had tried to repress Thunderdome. Damn you Slashdot!!!

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    10. Re:sheesh by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      It came from the user appropriately titled, "IN SOVIET RUSSIA."

      His jokes of late have fallen flat.
      In Soviet Russian, Film Mad Maxes you! Sorry couldn't help it. :)

    11. Re:sheesh by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

      Jakov Smirnoff

    12. Re:sheesh by DrMaurer · · Score: 2

      See, because of this, the possiblities are really interesting.

      I really liked that last Clint Eastwood western movie, I forgot which one it was, but Morgan Freeman and Gene Hackman were in it, too, IIRC. The concept of the old guy still humping along and getting a little slower is really interesting.

      Maybe, then again, I read Stephen King's Dark Tower series too much. I totally could direct that as a movie. (If I could get the money! I could even put Mr. King in the movie in a less than his usual annoying fashion, just kill him in Tull.)

      --
      Dan
    13. Re:sheesh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I realize it's not the popular or cool thing to criticize SUVs,

      Huh??? I don't know what world you're living in, but in my world it's oh-so-trendy to bash SUVs.

      Personally, I like weight. Lots and lots of weight.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    14. Re:sheesh by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I like weight. Lots and lots of weight.

      Why? The weight doesn't make you any safer. In fact it makes you less safe. In a car with a low mass and a low center of gravity, you handle better. Hence, you'll be more likely to avoid an accident by stopping quicker or by an evasive maneuver.

      People think weight gives you extra safety in a crash. This is true if you're hitting something that doesn't have enough mass, or inertia to stop your tank, like a small tree. It'll slow down your vehicle and not stop it completely, therefor less force will be applied to you. But factor in modern crumple zones, and this is negated. And then consider that anything that will stop you, well, you're no better off with all your weight. Also factor that the majority of collisions involve multiple vehicles. And in that instance, heavy vehicles are a more dangerous. The energy of a 6000 Lb tank @ 50 MPH > the energy of a 3000 Lb commuter car @ 50 MPH. When the two hit, all that energy goes into the crash. And it makes the crash worse for both vehicles.

      I had a Blazer once (a full sized K5, not one of these little pretend SUVs that call themselves blazers now). I used it on the weekends for off roading, and I used it when I went on missions with the Search And Rescue unit I used to work with. Off the road it was a great truck, it sat 4 and all the gear we carried, only ever got stuck once. But on the road, the damn thing was a menace. I managed to spin it twice. Once because of deer, the other time because I got cut off on an interstate full of traffic.

      To make a car handle better, (or stop shorter, or accelerate quicker) you LOWER it's mass, and LOWER it's center of gravity. Give it more rubber in contact with the ground helps as do tighter springs.

      But with the exception of tires, SUVs are all moving AWAY from all of these objectives! They're getting heavier, they're getting bigger, and taller, they're getting softer suspensions.

      Four months ago I was driving down 295 South going toward Philly. On the way I spotted something I'd never seen before in my rear view. A Z06. Brand New. Millennium Yellow. The ultimate sports car. Being DRIVEN.

      DRIVEN! HARD.

      Conditions were clear, nowhere for a cop to hide, and the guy was hauling. I slam on the gas, and let off a couple miles an hour from where my speed governor is. The guy's like 2000 Ft ahead of me and he's holding his distance. He's weaving through traffic, and I don't want to be too much of a dick, so I slow down. Besides, I know my car trying to keep up with him is ridiculous anyway. The guy's pulling away fast now and like I said, I'm near my speed governor at 108.

      5 minutes later I see a smoking thing on the median grass about half a mile ahead. I pull over and see that it's the bottom of a car staring at me, it's rear wheels still spinning, and I get out to see if I can help.

      I expected it to be the vette. I really did. He must have been doing 130 when I last saw him. And he was driving like an asshole (and having a world of fun in the process, I'm sure), not 5 under the limit like most vette drivers I see.

      It wasn't though, it was an SUV. A 2002 Chevy Trailblazer to be specific. They got clipped by a black sedan, (they said Mercedes or BMW, I forget which now) and you could see the black paint where it had clipped them. The impact put them into a spin and they wound up on the grass median. Once on the grass, they rolled. A car wouldn't have rolled. And (I'm guessing on the force here, since the sedan didn't spin) most cars wouldn't have spun either.

      Fortunately, both occupants lived. It rolled once, then settled on the driver's side. The driver was out when I got there, and another guy that stopped at the same time as me was already tending to her (her face was pretty bloody) I pulled the passenger out of the sun roof, (he had his seat belt on and at the angle he was hanging at, he had trouble reaching it himself (he was a large fellow)) he had some scrapes and a nasty looking bruise on his head, but otherwise seemed okay.

      This kind of thing happens all the time. There's a reason that the guy going 130 in the vette probably still has it and the 60 year old grandfather who was going to pick up his grandkids with his daughter doesn't have his Trailblazer today. Same day, same road, (long, flat, boring, same conditions. One car was built to handle the road. The other, not only wasn't built to handle the road, but it was later hacked and modified to iron out some of the quirks of it's truck like heritage. And it became more dangerous on the road and less useful off of the road because of it!

      I'm not saying I condone the way that the Vette guy was driving (nor all the fun I was having trying to keep up). That's not safe either. (yeah, I'm a hypocrite) But more weight != a safer vehicle. Not unless your such a bad driver that you shouldn't be on the road anyway. And then that safety will probably come at the expense of someone else's safety.

      I don't know about you, but I'd much rather avoid accidents (though, of course I still want to have crumple zones and airbags, etc in case they do happen) then just simply walk away from one.

    15. Re:sheesh by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      All you've proven with all of that is if you don't know how to drive large vehicles, then you can roll the vehicle. If you don't drive them like a sports car, they're not going to roll in normal conditions.

      As for your story about an SUV getting clipped, etc, that sounds a lot like someone saying, "I never wear seat belts, because what if I went off the road into a lake? I would be a dead man!" Sure, that's one scenerio ... but the odds of a seat belt saving you are are much higher than a seat belt killing you. I look at weight the same way. You're much more likely to be involved in a collision (rear-ender, most likely) than a spin off the road or a rolling accident. And if I have some jackass drunk driver like your sports car driver plowing into my family, I want to make sure it's my family coming out alive, not the drunk.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    16. Re:sheesh by vsprintf · · Score: 2

      Please tell me you're joking about the Suburban / hummer thing.

      Joking? Would I, vsprintf, someone who reached excellent karma solely on +FUNNY posts (okay, there was one lapse when I got a +5 informative) joke about such a topic? I think not! I should trade in my old, faithful, economical Toyota for something that can protect me and my slower responses from all those weird ricer boys. Of course, I probably won't do it - still living on the edge. :)

  2. profit ? by a7244270 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if they will make any money.

    According to the article they are going to spend about 180 mil to make MM4, and MM1,2,3 combined made less than 70 mil.

    But then again, these days is seems like all you need ia a hot chick and some special effects to rake it in - plot optional.

    1. Re:profit ? by Sancho · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Ah, but are those numbers inflated? Movies cost more now than they did then.

    2. Re:profit ? by JVert · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder how much Elijah Wood will make in 10 years make to star in Lord of the Rings 4...

    3. Re:profit ? by On+Lawn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From an email I recieved this morning...

      The trilogy of "Mad Max" pictures, for all their iconic value, amounted to a rather slender box office, grossing only $69 million in total domestically. That's partly because the 1979 original, released by Village Roadshow, Orion
      Pictures and AIP, was hardly seen Stateside at all. The franchise only grew significant with "Mad Max: The Road Warrior."

    4. Re:profit ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      First of all, the article said it was a $104 million project.

      Secondly, they said the first three movies grossed 69 million in the US. That doesn't count internation box office totals nor all the other sources of income consistant with films that achieve cult status.

    5. Re:profit ? by nakedbonzai · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as Kevin Costner isn't starring in it, it'll make money.

    6. Re:profit ? by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah, but are those numbers inflated? Movies cost more now than they did then.

      The original Mad Max was made on a very low budget. It was the highest profit to cost ratio movie until Blair Witch. So cheap that the only actor to wear real leather was Mel Gibson - the other characters had to do with fake leather.

      (All from the pop-up-video type notes on the DVD.)

    7. Re:profit ? by kizarny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Waterworld made money, over $70 million in its first domestic box office run, before overseas export, video release and licensing. It's a seldom stated film industry secret but... they all eventually make money.

    8. Re:profit ? by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


      They might make their money back. Austin Powers 2 made way more than AP 1 and cost a lot more, too.

      Consider Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back. That made over $100 million, and it was based on characters introduced in a movie that made far less (CLerks).

      I have a hard time stomaching the third movie in this series. I hope the fourth gets some quality directing and scripting. The fabled prequel would be awesome. I just hope there are no kids in this and it's rated R.

      According to the newly-released Mad Max DVD (I highly recommend it), the first one only cost $400k (AUS). It said they had a costume budget for the entire cast of only $3k, so they couldn't put everyone in real leather. Only Mel Gibson has real leather clothes. Everyone else is wearing "the finest vinyl" they could find.
    9. Re:profit ? by Iamthefallen · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, very few make money, in some magic way they all just barely break even...

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    10. Re:profit ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aah, but you're discounting the mystical "overheads". These fantastic creatures consume all of a films would-be profits, and as a result the poor filmcompany has to go to all the people who were promised a cut and tell them the sad news - they won't be paid after all.

    11. Re:profit ? by shogun · · Score: 2

      Hmm I dont think the Simirillian will work very well as a movie somehow...

    12. Re:profit ? by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      and i bet there are indian films made cheaper than any of the films mentioned here.

      There are lots of films made cheaper, especially as Joe Blow can take a camera out and make a film for practically nothing. I wouldn't bet on a decent quality Indian film being made much cheaper; there are certain costs - like actors and film and gas and costumes - that you can't cut without going the Blair Witch Project route, which used its low quality for a very deliberate effect.

      The question is the ratio of cost to profit; how many of those films made 100 million dollars? If they made 100 million dollars, then someone would start making better Indian films on more money (and/or Indian stars would start demanding a larger cut) and the Indian market would demading higher quality films.

    13. Re:profit ? by Blackneto · · Score: 2

      A mini series on SCI FI maybe?

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  3. 25 million? by PanBanger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess we know who run Bartertown.

    1. Re:25 million? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon people! What is this "25 million" and "$25,000,000.00" stuff I'm seeing here? This is News for Nerds for chrissake! Mel's salary will be $2.5e7. Get it right. :)

      GMD

    2. Re:25 million? by acherrington · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, thats only like $1.0e7 after tax or so.

      --


      Victory is gained, not in knowing your opponents next move, but in preempting them.
    3. Re:25 million? by delfstrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You must be a scientist type, then. An engineer would say 25.7M (Example, for ten megapascals an engineer writes 10 MPa, not 1.0E7 Pa)

    4. Re:25 million? by JohnsonWax · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be a private sector engineer, then. For ten kilometers per hour a NASA Mars probe engineer would say 10MPH.

    5. Re:25 million? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      Or, here's an idea, Australia, where he's from. Or did you just think the Mad Max franchise was set there for the quality internet access?

    6. Re:25 million? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 2

      You are right. I just learned he didn't move there until he was 9. Something every day, or so they say.

  4. With that salary... by jackb_guppy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This film will be about as good as number 3. Which was about as good as WaterWorld.

    The low budget Mad Max 1 & 2 were great, even though 2 was over dubbed in American.

    1. Re:With that salary... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Beyond Thunderdome was the easily the best Mad Max film. Hell, it's probably in the top 5 sf films of all time. Yep, 2001, Star Wars, Thunderdome, that sounds about right.

    2. Re:With that salary... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bah, Road Warrior was a 2 hour fight scene; MM3 was a cinematic, multidimensional view of the postapocalypse. And Star Wars is scifi; not hard scifi, but scifi.

    3. Re:With that salary... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      no it isn't, it's WWIII in space, with America as the Empire and NYC as the Death Star. Jedi = Islam. Obi Wan = Osama Bin Laden.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  5. YYYEEEEESSSSSSSS! by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is perhaps the coolest thing to ever happen!!


    "Two days ago I saw a vehicle that'd haul that tanker. You want to get out of here, you talk to me."

    "Damage? You should see the damage, bronze! Metal damage! Brain damage! You listening bronze??!"

    Ahh. I feel better now...

    1. Re:YYYEEEEESSSSSSSS! by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Damage? You should see the damage, bronze! Metal damage! Brain damage! You listening bronze??! I am the Nightrider. I'm a fuel injected suicide machine! I am the rocker! I am the roller! I am the metal controller! I'm the nightrider baby!" ... "I am the chosen one! The mighty hand of vengence sent down to stike the unroadworthy!! ... Step right up chum, and watch the kid lay down the rubber road right to freedom!!!"

      "The chain in those handcuffs is high tensile steel. It'd take ten minutes to hack through it with this. Now. If you're lucky, you could hack through your ankle in five minutes."

      I hope Johnny The Kid shows up in MM4 with one foot missing. That would kick ass.

      And yes, I DO need to get out more!

  6. Yeah but will they be clever... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 5, Funny

    enough to make it look as low budget as the first one? Paying Mel 25 million they may not have a choice! :-)

  7. they'll have some continuity issues, won't they? by condour75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, weren't we supposed to expect the apocalypse to have happened by now already? Or is it like a James Bond or Superman thing, the old Umberto Eco concept of the Open Text. I dunno.

  8. Exactly .. by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    He learned while leaving the thunderdome from masterblaster ... it's all about making them need you, or controlling something they need!!

    25 mill!!

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  9. And of course... by killthiskid · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:And of course... by killthiskid · · Score: 2

      Recursion!

      Stick that in your browser history and smoke it.

  10. Re:What? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

    He's.. he's just a child! He doesn't know any better.

  11. Coming soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny


    Mad Max 4:Beyond the Nursing Home

  12. Re:What? by chuckfirment · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You admit to being a "fan" of Thunder Dome? Blarg."

    I definately admit to it. To this day I'll occasionally hear the chanting in my head, "Two men enter! One man leave!"

    Thankfully it's at completely inappropriate times like corporate meetings or trying to merge in traffic.

    Chuck Firment

  13. Geek Quote coming ... okay here it is .... by airrage · · Score: 3, Funny

    Remember where you are. This is Thunderdome. Death is listening, and will take the first man who screams.

    Of course, I say Remember where you are. This is Slashdot. Mod is listening, and will take the first man who posts.

    We don't need another hero, hero, all we want is what's beyond Thunderdome!

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Geek Quote coming ... okay here it is .... by unicron · · Score: 2

      Whenever I see Thunderdome, I always feel a great sense of humility,human-ness, and even pride at the end during the girls speech. Like if something catasrophic were to happen our history would be our most prized possesion. I'm aware it's just a movie but it's a pretty awesome fuckign feeling knowing that what I do now, and what any of us do, could very well be the stuff of legend to a group of people that won't exist for hundreds of years.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Geek Quote coming ... okay here it is .... by yack0 · · Score: 2

      Two moderators enter, one moderator leaves....

      --
      -- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
  14. According to Google News? by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean according to Google News by way of CNN, by way of Reuters, don't ya?

    1. Re:According to Google News? by tfreport · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This should be modded up. This was the first thing I thought about reading this article, there is no Google News in terms of reporting stories. Sure you can mention that they pointed you to the story but saying that something is acording to them is wrong.

      It has been said on Slashdot many times that Google should not be held responsible for what it links to (the whole Church of Scientology debate) but it then should also not credit for someone else's reporting. It is only the way it should be that you either always are responsible for links or you never are.

    2. Re:According to Google News? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2

      The news industry is kind of held in a different standard because this is normal. Reuters is a wire service, and it's common practice for newspapers to reprint articles verbatim from a wire service (after paying for them, naturally.) Google News is also somewhat edited; any crackpot can write a story and send it to a news outlet (newspaper, etc) but it's up to their editors whether or not to print it; thus giving the newspaper some sort of responsibility to what they print.

  15. High Polish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...the script has been in the works for 3 years and is highly polished.

    3 years!?! That script must be so polished you have to shield your eyes from it.

    1. Re:High Polish by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > 3 years!?! That script must be so polished you have to shield your eyes from it.

      "Don't look at the script, Marion!"

      Chris Mattern

  16. Mel in a dog costume by eyeball · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one that read the title as "Furry Road?"

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
    1. Re:Mel in a dog costume by daeley · · Score: 2

      Mel in a dog costume
      Am I the only one that read the title as "Furry Road?"


      Welllllllll, Mel in a dog costume is not the first thing I think of when I see that title you...

      Never mind. This is a family geek discussion board. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  17. MAD Max? by Scotch+Game · · Score: 4, Funny

    For $25,000,000 for the fourth movie he should go from "Mad Max" to "Old, Rich, Happy Max".

    1. Re:MAD Max? by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Capital One comerial? Or new Mad Max film?
      What's in your wallet Mel?

  18. re: New Mad Max Film by jonerik · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to Google News Mel Gibson has signed up for a new Mad Max film "Fury Road".

    And it's already available at sidewalk kiosks throughout China.

  19. More apocalyptic blather? by guacamolefoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read about the movie this morning on CNN, but I wasn't really that excited by it. The interesting part of the story arc has been exhausted, IMHO. I'm not exactly sure where this one will go, unless it is a rehash of the last two plots.

    1. Mad Max = world going to hell
    2. Road Warrior = world gone to hell
    3. Thunderdome = World gone to hell, but redeeming itself
    4. New movie = (?) Make money!

    There is some overlap (Road Warrior had an inkling of redemption at the end, but it was more explicit in Thunderdome.

    This may end up being a good action flick, but I am not seeing significant potential to do anything very new or exciting. I expect that, like Mel, we'll find out that the series is old and tired.

    guac-foo.

    1. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Telastyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Kinda like Harrison Ford and the "new" Indiana Jones movie? Or the Scooby Doo movie? Or the Star Wars prequels? Or...

      Seems like alot of Movie Execs (read: tripe) have gone from rehashing old, moderately good films, into moderate films with different names and just went straight to remaking the same damned film, this time with nostalgia!

    2. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by moosemoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its actually, "furry road" and the plot involves an aging warrior who mows down small rodents on an abandoned interstate with his flamethrowing wheel chair in order to provide food to the starving survivors of the apocalypse.

      --
      the real evil is not what people think - its how people think
    3. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Khomar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Same thing with the new Terminator movie... It seems to me that Hollywood is scrambling for new ideas since their current batch of writers have run out. Meanwhile, some strange Kiwi's down south had the novel concept (no pun intended) of taking a famous piece of literature, adding massive amounts of love and care, and a heavy dose of creativity and integrity (both severely lacking in Hollywood) to make what looks to be a truly spectacular set of films on a relatively low budget ($70 million per film). Is anyone in Hollywood taking notes? If they are, are they taking the right notes? (I expect to see a slew of terrible fantasy clones released in the coming years until Hollywood once again learns the wrong lesson that fantasy films don't work...*sigh*)

      Hollywood today seems to be only capable of rehashing old ideas without any real creative imagination. I do not doubt that this creativity exists, but for some reason it is not allowed to thrive. Why is Lord of the Rings successful? There was very little involvement from the high level, Hollywood executives. They let the creative people be creative with plenty of financial backing and time to truly let them imaginations fly. It was something new and distinctive.

      Mad Max IV? When will Hollywood realize that what they need is true creativity. Throwing massive amounts of money at an old, fading idea does not equate to a great movie.


      Someday I'll think up a good sig...

      --

      I believe in de-evolution. God made the world perfect, man fell, and its been going downhill ever since!

    4. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the plots are more like this:

      1. Mad Max = Max chased in his car
      2. Road Warrior = Max chased in his truck
      3. Thunderdome = Max chased in his train
      4. New movie = Max chased in his Rolls Royce

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    5. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by Syris · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Movie executives are presented with the following choice:


      1. Remake an old movie or add another sequel to a successful series...


      or


      2. Create an entirely new movie that no one has ever heard of knows about.


      Trying a new concept or story always represents a risk to the movie houses, while remaking an old movie or adding a sequel seems a surer way to generate buzz and revenue. If you disagree, consider this thread; it's free publicity for the makers of Mad Max 4.

    6. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by mike3411 · · Score: 2

      I never understood exactly how the world in Mad Max -> the world in Road Warrior. I thought mad max was extremely cool in its depiction of a society thats been gutted - there are still so many vestiges and many people still live "normal" lives, i.e. get up, go to work, buy food & store, etc. The Road Warrior's future just seemed kind of silly, there were like 10 ppl left in a desert fighting, i never understood why they didnt go some place else, like some place that could be farmed (and perhaps didnt have roads for the bad guys to use). Seemed much less believable than the first one. And beyond thunderdome sucked donkey balls. Dear god was it bad. It suscked so much I cant go into detail because Ive suppressed the memory. If they make another like that itll be worthless, if they make something along the lines of the road warrior or, better yet, mad max, then i'll see it.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    7. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Posts like this make me wonder if it would be practical for me to put scripts for my film ideas online, and set up a paypal "penny jar" so people liking the scripts could make donations. Later, after the film has been produced, people that have made signficiant contributions (10$?) would get the finished product...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:More apocalyptic blather? by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

      Good theory, except apparently this movie isn't being driven by your aptly described tripe (read: Movie Execs). If anything it seems to be just the opposite.

      According to Coming Attractions, after trying to revive Mad Max for some time, creator/director George Miller was able to win back the rights back to his franchise from Warner (who wanted to produce an updated, clean-cut "tripe" version, probably to make money selling toys) in exchange for handing "Contact" over to Robert Zemeckis. Since then he's been devoting a lot of his effort to developing this relatively risky movie and shopping around for a studio willing to produce and distribute it.

      Now I'm sure he's hoping to make a bundle, but with the whole series combined earning well under the budget of this film, if profit was the only motive he'd still be milking the critical and popular success of "Babe" and producing completely mainstream star-of-the-week movies or maybe a direct to video "Babe IX" by now, not an expensive but bleak post-apocalyptic film that will have to be outstanding in order to favourably stand up to the originals and to deflect the sentiment (from fans, critics, and the general public) that they're just doing it for the money.

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  20. I don't know by tps12 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll see it, I'm sure, but I'm skeptical as to whether the true spirit of the originals will persist. The ideas and expressions that once comprised pop culture have changed so much that the original Mad Max themes of individualist strength and moral integrity will probably be cast aside in favor of a more contemporary populist sensibility.

    By way of comparison, consider that "Popeye" had a character called Wimpy, who was addicted to hamburgers (a stand-in for alcohol in those more sensitive times). He was continuously broke, and to finance his habit was reduced to trying to con other characters out of their money ("I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today"). His crippling addiction lost him everything, even his dignity. He was not a hero, but a character to be pitied for his devotion to something so artificial and his lack of work ethic.

    Look at today's children's cartoons and you'll find nothing like Wimpy. Instead, you'll see obviously gay characters like Spongebob Squarepants, who epitomizes and glorifies chronic laziness and disrespect for authority. Even his name, "Squarepants," alludes to the angular uniforms of China's Red Army. Is it any surprise that generation Xers grow up with no work ethic and a feeling of entitlement, when they have been indoctrinated with this kind of skewed moral framework? The values expressed in the original Mad Max films are completely alien to them, and I'm not optimistic that they'll come through at all.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:I don't know by pmancini · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, Spongebob is not gay. He has a rather attractive squiril girlfriend. (how do you spell the name of that rodent???)

      While the gay-ultra-left may push for Good 'ole Spongebob to be gay, he ain't!

      Plus, who cares? The Pirate is the real star of the show!

    2. Re:I don't know by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's how I understand the spinach thing:

      Popeye was originally an adult comic strip, published for sailors out at sea. It was in something like stars and stripes, or whatever.

      Anyways, he was a charicature of 'a sailor man', and would go ashore, get drunk, pick up hookers, swear constantly, and fight anyone who crossed his path.

      Anyhow, kids would get ahold of the comic and start reading it. And, much like today (GTA3, etc) parents and do-gooders protested and whined. "Please think of the children".

      So as a gag, EC Segar decided to mock all the whiners and put a 'kid friendly' message into one of the strips - he ate his spinach and then kicked everyones ass. It stuck.

      It was a running gag to mock whiners. Eventually it became nothing more than a kids cartoon, but the spinach thing was already there.

      Besides, he doesnt suck it through a pipe.

      BTW, the "mexican loco weed" thing is an urban legend. It never happened.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:I don't know by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      Besides, he doesnt suck it through a pipe.

      Actually, I remember that once or twice he did, when Bluto had him tied up, and all he could move was his head. He puffed his pipe into a veritable cutting torch, melted off the lid, and sucked down a load of the green stuff in one mighty movement.

    4. Re:I don't know by El · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you begin to find cartoon squirrels attractive, maybe you should take that as a sign that you REALLY need to get out more often!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    5. Re:I don't know by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Popeye...would go ashore, get drunk, pick up hookers, swear constantly, and fight anyone who crossed his path.

      Kind of like Russell Crowe, huh?
      "We're fightin' 'round th' world!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  21. Let's see.... by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Insightful
    1. Original director from first film
    2. Big budget
    3. A script that's been in the works for years
    4. Beloved franchise
    5. Original actors where possible
    Sounds like it can't go wrong, right?

    Can you say The Phantom Menace?

    1. Re:Let's see.... by ggruschow · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Sounds like it can't go wrong, right? Can you say The Phantom Menace?

      Uh yeah. The Phantom Menace was a major flop (where major flop is defined as the #3 highest grossing film so far.

      Seriously. Who here didn't see it?

      Now, I know you think it sucked, but I bet you went and saw Episode 2 as well, eh?

      I was too young to see Mad Max 1-3 in theaters. I'll go and see this one so long as it's rated >40% on rottentomatoes.

    2. Re:Let's see.... by Schnapple · · Score: 2

      The Phantom Menace, financially, was hardly a flop. However, most people were disappointed by it - even the ones who liked it found it little disappointing. My point was that even sure fire formulas can miss.

    3. Re:Let's see.... by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      Still haven't seen The Phantom Menace. Downloaded it, but it was all in Norwegian. Haven't tried again.

      If you think the Phantom Menace wasn't a flop, compare it's DVD sales with LOTR. There should be a comparison, there isn't.

      All that being said, it couldn't have been as bad as Harry Pothead.

      ~Hammy

    4. Re:Let's see.... by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Why do you expect us to be interested in whether it will make a profit? We're not getting a cut. We're more interested in whether we will enjoy watching the movie.

      And FWIW, I waited to see Episode II in the dollar theater :)

    5. Re:Let's see.... by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      The Phantom Menace was so bad that no, I didn't go to see Episode 2. I'm sure e2 made way less money just because TPM was such a disappointment.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    6. Re:Let's see.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Hint--if the film makes money, the people who run the studios don't care if it was so bad that it caused uncontrollable projectile vomiting in the audience. As far as they're concerned, the formula worked, and they'll keep using it.

      Chris Mattern

    7. Re:Let's see.... by Schnapple · · Score: 2

      I assume the "uncontrollable projectile vomiting" was in reference to The Blair Witch Project, which did cause that (due to ShakyCam) and was "guaranteed" two sequels, but after Book of Shadows tanked they wouldn't let it have the second sequel.

  22. this can't be good by s.d. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With the first one made in 1979, that means mel gibson will be what, 25 yrs or so older in this one. Now I realize he's only going to be 47 this coming yr, but still, it strikes me the same as making a new Indiana Jones movie at this point. It's a sequel to a movie (or series of movies) I liked a lot, but is the actor too old to portray the character? I don't want to think of Indiana Jones or Mad Max as older -- they're the guys in the originals, characters like that don't age. It's why they switch James Bond actors. You don't want to see James Bond realistically portrayed as a 60 yr old spy. He's a 30+ yr old guy kicking ass and sleeping with hot women.

    1. Re:this can't be good by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Watch the first three movies. The world ages...so do the characters. I see no paradox in revisiting the world after another 5-10 years and find that Max looks 15 years older. Youth and beauty can never beat old age and treachery, you know.

    2. Re:this can't be good by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      It's in your head, man. If you don't like the story, you don't have to believe in it.

      Me? I prefer Brian Aldiss's Star Wars prequel plot, and my own history of the Butlerian Jihad.

      Maybe some other idiots ineherited the rights to publish their versions for profit, but that doesn't mean their stories are the true ones.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:this can't be good by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Three words: "Grumpy Old Max"

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    4. Re:this can't be good by Stormie · · Score: 2

      It's why they switch James Bond actors. You don't want to see James Bond realistically portrayed as a 60 yr old spy. He's a 30+ yr old guy kicking ass and sleeping with hot women.

      That'd be nice, except that Pierce Brosnan is 49 - and looks it. Christ, just cast cast Rupert Everett or Robbie Williams or someone.

  23. Mad Max Movies FAQ by eht · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mad Max Movies FAQ is a great link for all thing's Mad Max

  24. In this episode... by ptomblin · · Score: 5, Funny

    He makes it to the shore just as Kevin Costner steps ashore from his catamaran.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:In this episode... by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! Maybe they can team up to deliver the mail....

    2. Re:In this episode... by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 2
      First, being a more "environmentally friendly" Mad Max, he has to search the dessert to get a new fuel cell for his car/battle wagon.

      --
      This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
  25. MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by GodHead · · Score: 5, Funny


    Mel will be driving a beat up station wagon, with the right turn signel flashing, 20 miles an hour under the speed limit while looking for an all-you-can-eat buffet.

    --
    Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    1. Re:MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

      It'd be funnier if Mr. Gibson would drive around in a custom paint GMC G series van (a la A-TEAM) with trusty old Mr. T as his sidekick. Mad Max, Mr. T, helluva ebonics and a spiffy van. Can't go wrong.

    2. Re:MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      and worst of all don't forget the usual gratuitous Gibson bare hind shot....NOOOOOOOOooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

    3. Re:MAD MAX Beyond Geritol by Fjord · · Score: 2

      I ain't getting in no plane, Max!

      --
      -no broken link
  26. Yes, but Australian culture is still different by typical+geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    and as long as Kennedy shoots the films in Australia, enough of the Australian culture, with it's swaggering, hard drinking, tough individualistic nature that show in Mad Max I and II, will flavor Mad Max IV so that it can avoid the worst excesses of the namby-pamby PC culture we live in.

    True, the Aussie have had to turn in their guns, and since the Olympics in Sydney they can no longer beat and kill the blackfellas with impunity, but they're still just about the most macho sorts on earth.

    So, yes, I have high hopes for this sequel, and as a devoted Mad MAx fan, you can bet that once it's been shot, I will stay up all night scouring WinMX, edonkey and Kazaa for the divx to download.

  27. well, in that case by sydlexic · · Score: 4, Funny

    he sure looks old for his age. in close-ups he reminds me of the cigarette man.

    1. Re:well, in that case by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Well, Mad Max is supposed to be pretty weather-beaten. :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:well, in that case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason Mel Gibson looks old is because nearly every other Hollywood star of his magnitude even close to his age has had plastic surgery.

      He looks normal for a 46-year old.

  28. Re:What? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    Ignore the plot and much of the dialog. Look at the world. There are few other films that build as good a world as the Mad Max films did. It's not a great movie, I'll grant that, but it's still great entertainment.

  29. Highly Polished by sdo1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Highly Polished... yea, I know what that means. It means a committee has been hard at work f***ing up what was probably a pretty good script.

    A couple of recent script-by-committee disasters include "How the Grinch Stole Christmas", "Batman and Robin", and "The Scorpion King". Of course having one person in full control of the script isn't necessarily a good thing either as Mr. Lucas has so painfully pointed out.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Highly Polished by dimator · · Score: 2

      *cringe*

      And thank you very much for putting me through that again.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  30. Walk away. Just walk away. by Bitter+Cup+O+Joe · · Score: 3, Funny

    While I'd love to see a good new movie, and I hope that the script really is as polished as everyone attached is claiming, I get the feeling that the best move is to walk away.

    Of course, as soon as I turn to leave, I'll catch a crossbow bolt through the head by some mohawked buy hissing at me.

    --
    "This is your world. These are your people. You can live for yourself today, or help build tomorrow for everyone."
  31. These movies rock by geek · · Score: 2

    They were so ahead of their time. the essential were doing what Water World tried to do 20 years before.

    The messages in the movie are subtle and often hidden under all the chaos and death, but they are there nonetheless.

    Mel Gibson is a superb actor, if anyone can pull this off it's him. Very few actors can sustain a series like this, Stallone, Arnold, Bruce Willis.

    I'm boycotting the theatres but I'll definately by the DVD.

  32. Cloning by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    At $25m/movie....aren't we getting close to the stage where it's cheaper to have Colbians kidnap the star, steal their DNA, and for underground Japanese cloning labs to clone said star? ;-)

    Hold on....I just gave away the plot for Mel Gibson's NEXT movie!!!

    -psy

    1. Re:Cloning by g4dget · · Score: 2

      That has the additional advantage that the star of the movie would have a somewhat more believable age.

  33. AWRIGHT! by JPelorat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, and he shoots Costner in the head with his shotgun pistol! I'd pay to see that!

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  34. Re:Mel Gibson = AARP by geek · · Score: 2

    Never fear, Jar-Jar to the rescue!

  35. Re: New Mad Max Film by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dark Helmet:
    How can there be a cassette of Spaceballs: The Movie? We're still in the middle of making it!
    Col. Sandurz:
    That's true, sir. But, there's been a new breakthrough in home video marketing.
    Dark Helmet:
    There has?
    Col. Sandurz:
    Yes. Instant cassettes. They're out in stores before the movie is finished.

  36. Re:Yay overrated actors by geek · · Score: 2

    More important than actors? Fine you get your ass up in front of the camera.

    Sorry pal but actors go through hell trying to make, they earn their dues just like everyone else. Drop the elitest attitude.

    Yes Mel makes a lot of cash. Big deal, he earns it.

    Don't like that? To bad, Mel will pack the house. No one cares who wrote, for better or worse.

    I happen to like Mels acting, have since I saw the first Mad Max movie. He's extremely talented and deserves what ever the market is willing to give him

  37. Highly polished? by MeanMF · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is what the actualy article says about the script:

    "This is the most exhaustively prepared movie I have ever been associated with," said Hutch Parker, president of production at Twentieth Century Fox. "The script is as ready as they come."

    I can imagine the conversation:
    "So how does the script look?"
    "It's exhaustively prepared."
    "Is it good?"
    "It's as ready as they come!"
    "oh...great."

  38. Which is going to worse? by happyhippy · · Score: 3, Funny
    This or Terminator 3?

    Taking bets now.

  39. The last of the V8 Interceptors by bmajik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Road Warrior was my favorite movie from the first time i saw it (at the tender age of 5) up until "The Devil's Advocate" came out.

    Nobody in kindergarten knew what the hell i was talking about if i asked them if they needed a guy to haul this rig.

    To this day, i still want the car he had in mad max. That supercharger (albeit fake) was the coolest thing i've ever seen. And i want a gear lever with a red button on it that makes the most glorious sound i've ever heard. I had a whole section on my website about the mad max car and some guy in .au emailed me about it with lots of details and info while i was in college. There are clone mad max cars up for auction from time to time. Hopefully, when im old and loaded, i'll be able to pick up a perfect replica mad-max car, with a _working_ super charger that somehow makes that incredible whine when i engage the supercharger.

    I've actually asked a couple of tuners about that functionality, apparently it was pretty suspect. To run a boosted motor you need to run lower compression pistons to avoid predetonation, which means that when the SC was disengaged you'd be making shit for power , (although i guess technically you'd be using less gas, but the engine would be way less than optimally efficient). that makes it basically a tradeoff, theres probably some crossover point where you're actually getting better "bang for your gas" with the SC engaged than with it off.

    Also, whowever invented the wrist-gauntlet mounted mini-crossbow is a diety.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by geek · · Score: 2

      Just use NOS. I had NOS + super charger in a 78 camaro in high school. I blew the manifold senior year hitting 170+mph on the freeway at 2am.

      They are fun to have but they get pricey in terms of maintenance. It's like having a kid, you gotta pamper it.

      What I want is to build one myself. My old 78 was 90% done by the guy i bought it from. I want to go to a junk yard and find me a frame, then start building from there. I hear Corvettes are great for this, early model 60's vettes that is. Okay I strayed from the topic a little.

    2. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by seanmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you were wondering, that car was a Jensen Interceptor..

    3. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by bmajik · · Score: 3, Informative

      the problem with NOS is that its not movie authentic.

      You may remember that humongous's turbine powered truck seemed to have a NOS bottle on it that gave it the power to overtake mad max and then the quasi-gay biker used a vertical truck exhaust pipe to bash in the windshield on the interceptor, forcing max off the road and ultimately causing the car to be destroyed and his dog to be shot.

      putting NOS on a car would be like sleeping with the enemy. I don't care if it would go faster, max's car didn't have it :)

      im not sure if this should get
      +1 Funny (why do you know that shit, loser)
      or
      -1 Get A Life (why do you know that shit, loser)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    4. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by rudiger · · Score: 2

      no way, Back to the Future's delorean totally owns mad max's ride.

    5. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by geek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Knight Rider is king of the heap, sorry

    6. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by antirename · · Score: 2

      I run 14:1 compression with a roots-style blower at 12 lbs of boost. It doesn't run on pump gas very well, and I don't expect it to last very long, but it's fast :) Actually, that car was inspired by Mad Max. Hint: don't use something that get 3-4 miles to the gallon for a daily driver. I did and about went broke putting gas in the thing. I have seen a car with a "switchable" blower; you can do it by attaching the electric clutch from an air conditioning compressor behind the blower pulley. This is NOT an easy project, and you wind up turning custom pulleys and spacers on a lathe, but it can be done if you know what you're doing. However, you're going to foul your plugs pretty quick since the fuel-air mix kind of drips off the blower rotors into the manifold. It looks cool, but really doesn't work too well. Also, be careful stuffing too much horsepower into a unibody car like mine (66 Mustang fastback) or this Falcon (if it is indeed a unibody). It sucks to finally solve you're traction problem and then realize that not only did you twist your driveshaft but that your door doesn't open too easily (because you twisted the whole damn chassis and need a frame machine to fix it). Cars like this are fun, but the fake blower might be a more practical approach. Of course, in my opinion if cops are going to pull you over just to see what the hell you're driving you might as well have a real blower :)

    7. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Most superchargers are always on, though I guess it wouldn't be too hard to get a clutch assembly on one. You can counteract detonation some by using higher octane gas. This is the whole "premium gasoline for cars that benefit from premium" thing. All modern engines have knock sensors and if you give it cheap gas, they'll knock a bit, the engine will retard ignition some (until after full compression) so you won't knock but performace will suffer. Give it premium gas and it won't have to compromise like that. The downside is cost - race gas is 104, 105 octane, but costs $3 or $4 per gallon in the US, about double normal prices. Honda got creative with the rules a few years back and had some effectively 120 octane fuel in their F1 cars, I don't want to know what that was per gallon.

      You can also strap on an intercooler (a.k.a. intake charge cooler) which cools the air coming into the engine. It gets heated up under compression (your old friend PV = nRT) and this leads to detonation. An intercooler can cool it down some to avoid this a bit, you can be a bit more aggressive on your compression ratios.

    8. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by e40 · · Score: 2

      When I saw RW at 20 (or thereabouts) it was the most violet movie I had ever seen (including Alien, which was a close 2nd). I can't imagine a 5 yr old seeing it. That's messed up.

    9. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by antirename · · Score: 2

      The problem with this is that it can lead to spectacular engine failures if you run lean with the boost up and nitrous on. That can happen with either system on its own, of course, but together... I built a drag car for a guy with a blower (the one that's on my Mustang now... he couldn't afford to repair all the damage from the incident I'm about to describe and I got it cheap :). Anyway, he wanted to run for money. I put in a smallblock Ford, heavily modified (read expensive), the blower system, a plate nitrous system, and a fogger system. The car didn't live long enough to be put on a dyno, but it had BALLS. Anyway, we talked NHRA into letting us run the car as test and tune when the work was done. I set it up to run rich, set the nitrous controller to kick in the nitrous from 0% at the starting line when the transbrake came off to 100% by the 60 foot mark (estimated). I told him it would smoke, but to keep the plugs clean and let be know how it ran (I had a final the night this happened and couldn't attend). His driver made a pass, and thought it wasn't fast enough (he must have has brass balls or been on crack). The driver then decided to play mechanic, and while the hood was up to spray down the radiator the swapped the nitrous jets in the plate system for the biggest ones he could find in the kit that I left in car (that plate alone, the way I had it, was good for 300 HP if I remember correctly, and no we didn't expect it to last long. Hey, it's his money). Of course, the driver has no knowledge of basic physics and left the fuel jets alone. He ran the car, the engine EXPLODED and took most of the front of the car off with it. The blower went quite a ways up in the air, don't know how far but it went out of the frame of the video real quick, and landed in the stands. No one got hurt, but the blower landed in an empty lawn chair in the pit area and amazing suffered very little damage thanks to the breakaway studs holding it to the lower manifold. The rest of the car was a write-off. If you have three high-volume pumps pumping race gas to the engine (one for the carb, one for each nitrous system) through half-inch aluminum fuel tubing and an engine grenades, you pump five gallons of gas onto the wreckage long before the fire crew gets to the car. Bottom line: high compression, a blower, and nitrous is a dangerous combination unless you know what you're doing and you change the mixture in VERY small steps and are planning to rebuild/replace the motor every couple of weeks. If you try this, be careful, and if you're a novice with a musclecar and lots of money, please do not engage the nitrous while passing me on the interstate. I've never been a big fan of shattered cast iron coming through my windshield.

    10. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by seanmeister · · Score: 2

      Oh shit.. I stand corrected!

    11. Re:The last of the V8 Interceptors by Reziac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorta sideways, but you point up why the Mad Max films WORKED: they were true to their own internal reality. The culture was bizarre, but it was believable in its own context, and the artifacts (such as the wrist-rocket style crossbow) were well-matched in that context. The vehicles are cool because they *feel* right, not just because they looked great.

      Back when Thunderdome came out, there were dire predictions that it would be a terrible movie and how no way in hell could it live up to MM2, yadda yadda. Well, it was a different kind of movie (much as MM1 and MM2 are *very* different from one another), but it was true to its world. It *worked*. Gee, it wasn't a letdown after all.

      So I'm inclined to give MM4 the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  40. Re:Mad Max 4- by godawful · · Score: 2, Informative

    if you will recall, max's interceptor was blown to pieces in the road warrior after someone tried to get his gasoline without defusing the booby trap

    --
    Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
  41. Movies as marketing gimmicks by Undaar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think my favourite part of the article is the president of Fox saying, "This is an event movie, and we know how to market event movies."

    It's not even about the movie anymore. It's just about how much marketing can be done; how much money can be made.

    --
    ~ "When I'm of that age I'm just going to live up a tree."
  42. The Sure Kiss of Death by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article: But, says Parker, "there are so few roles that define 'big screen action hero' and this is one of them. This is an event movie, and we know how to market event movies. It's Max the way you want to see him."

    You see, it's an _event_. Rowf!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  43. Re:Yay overrated actors by kizarny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've worked in production offices for a few years and, while actors are getting some serious perks for "playing pretend", they also take the brunt of the blame if the movie goes over budget, hits delays or ultimately crashes and burns. I'm not saying that it's fair compensation but if I work on a string of movies that tank I still have a fairly easy time finding work on another one, not so with the face on the screen.

  44. Re:According to Google News??? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Funny

    um news.google.com They have entered the world of journalism. Well not really, its just a really cool gizmo that leeches news off other sites, kinda like slashdot, except automated, and with less dupes.

    --
    Why not fork?
  45. Danny Glover is costarring by geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    In an interview Mel and Danny proclaimed "We're not to old for this shit!"

  46. timely! by kevin+lyda · · Score: 5, Funny

    woo-hoo! new mad max film. it would be a good idea to study it to learn how to live after bush starts a nuclear holocaust...

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  47. (roaring of engines ceases, picks up microphone) by gspeare · · Score: 2

    You plan to make a movie big enough to haul in the huge wads of cash you need to pay Mel Gibson's script.

    What a puny plan.

  48. hahaha by geek · · Score: 2

    Dude you've seen it to many times.

    You could always look into what Saleen does with their Mustangs. They supercharge the hell out of them. I used to race against a guy with an old 5.0 Saleen, he made the quarter mile in 11 seconds, with the car stock.

    1. Re:hahaha by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      I used to race against a guy with an old 5.0 Saleen, he made the quarter mile in 11 seconds, with the car stock.

      Bunk alert. No Saleen has ever done a quarter mile in 11 seconds stock. Ever.

      The closest would be the Mustang Cobra R doing 12.8 with 385hp. That had a Lincoln Navigator 5.4L V8 in it.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:hahaha by geek · · Score: 2

      well he claimed it was stock, i'd like to see your evidence that no Saleen ever has stock, that sounds false to me.

  49. Other stipulations... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 3, Funny


    I heard that in his contract on the set everyone is to refer to him as "Lord Humongous."

  50. Fake Leather? by theduck · · Score: 5, Funny

    You had fake leather? You were lucky! When I was a lad, we had to paint our bodies with hot sulfurous pitch if we wanted to even LOOK like we wore fake leather in a movie!

    --
    How can we afford to ever sleep
    So sound again
    --ebtg
    1. Re:Fake Leather? by Bobb+Sledd · · Score: 5, Funny

      You had sulfurous pitch? You were lucky...

      --
      "They said I probly shouldn't fly with just one eye," "I am Bender. Please insert girder."
    2. Re:Fake Leather? by shogun · · Score: 2

      You were able to complain that other people were lucky.....

  51. A cool plot by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Max discovers an old crate of Viagra underneath some rubble, and heads back to Barter Town's red light district in a hurry.

  52. Where are the bristish??? by pagercam2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Patriot - American challenges the English Braveheart - Scottish challenges the English MadMax4 - Auzzies challenge the English?????

    1. Re:Where are the bristish??? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I suppose that would be Pappagallo, since Mike Preston is actually English.

      [I worked on a "Hunter" set with him. Real nice guy, very professional. Good actor, too.]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  53. There's a decent article.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 2

    There's a decent article that just came out about the prequels in the latest edition of the Bright Lights Film Journal.

    Reading it made me wonder if the film was actually better for having Lucas behind the camera.

    Back to the issue of Mad Max, I doubt anything can go wrong as long as they haul back Tina Turner. She easily made the third film. :)

    1. Re:There's a decent article.... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      David Brin has an equally strong counter-argument. If you found the Brigh Lights Film Journal article thought-provoking, you may want to check his view out also. He's coherent, thoughtful, and heartfelt.

      He has a few short essays on the subject, one of which will do nicely for starters:

      http://www.kithrup.com/brin/starwarsarticle.html

      The other essays are referenced and/or linked to from this one, so you should be able to find all the parts of his analysis if you're interested.

      Enjoy!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  54. He hasn't taken good care of his skin by burgburgburg · · Score: 2

    He just looks quite a bit older then he is.

  55. Remember lingerie? by burgburgburg · · Score: 2
    We're partners, pal.

    You! You can run, but you can't hide.

    We've all lost someone we love.

    The Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla!

    Be a shame to blow it up.

  56. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

    Pre-emptive strike against everyone complaining about how we shouldn't let the MPAA control our lives here.

    --
    [o]_O
  57. Re:Wimp by aridhol · · Score: 2, Funny
    Where's that hex troll when you need him?

    Real programmers would talk about $0x17D7840, $0137274100, or $1011111010111100001000000 (hex, octal, and binary respectively)

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  58. Re:What? by Bonker · · Score: 2

    I felt like the major theme of Thunderdome was the beginning of rebuilding of culture after the the big end.

    The conflict, in case you hadn't noticed, was not between Max, The Kiddies, and Tina Turner. The real conflict was between the gentler, more spiritual, but primative cargo-cult-style cutlure the children had built for themselves and the harsher, capitalistic culture of Batertown. Which of these two would be the salvation of the human race? Barter-town was certainly growing and progressing faster than the Kiddies, but was already encountering shortages and conflicts that could only be dealt through with war... The Thunderdome. Even though they claimed to have done away with the past, it still haunted them. The Kiddies were holding onto the past like a religion... and only a religion. They were starting over from the ground up, having truly left the past behind them for all intents and purposes.

    The director's view of the conflict is pretty straightforward. Which culture moved back into the cities and began to rediscover technology at the end of the movie?

    I hear a lot of people complain about Beyond Thunderdome. I think it's because they're not looking deeply enough for real, chewable content. It's a great movie. You just have to know where to look to find it. (Hint... It's not in Tina's chainmail minidress.)

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  59. You're kidding, right? by serutan · · Score: 2

    Right?

  60. Something I wonder... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    Will Max sound the same?

    Think about it - back in the old episodes, Mel Gibson was still talking twangy aussie-like (not sure what to call it, so don't flame me) - since then, he has managed to "Americanize" himself away from the "Aussie Mad Max" image (voice coaching? I dunno). I have to say I like the works he has done recently (Ransom and What Women Want being two of the better "normal length" recent movies, IMHO) - but there isn't much of a trace of "Mad Max" in either.

    I hope what they do with the movie is advance the time a few decades, cast Mel as an older, wiser Max - then get the dude who played the "Ferral Kid" to be the main risk taker, under the watchful eye of Max - it would make sense, timewise - and I think the guy could pull it off...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  61. There CAN'T be a Mad Max 4 by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2

    I killed Mad Max in Fallout(tm)!!!! His dog isn't that loyal to my surprise...

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  62. my bad... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    I got confused. I thought those were totals for each week. Instead, they're cummulative totals. My point was that derivative works often sell in excess of the original works.

    Look at Scary Movie. That is a satire of several other movies and it made $156 million. Many of the famous movies it's referencing made far less but they are famous enough to give the derivative work traction in the market..
  63. Infact by geek · · Score: 2

    http://www.saleen.com/auto/SR/srperformance.html

    This Saleen does 11.8 stock

    This wasn't what he was driving so you're probably right his car wasnt doing 11, but you are obviously quite wrong that no Saleen has. The Cobra is a joke compared to Saleen mustangs.

    1. Re:Infact by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      http://www.saleen.com/auto/SR/srperformance.html

      You are telling me that he has an SR? And he's racing it? The SR is a new car as well, so unless you were racing him within the last 2 years, no, he was lying. I didn't realize they were actually selling the SRs now anyway. I don't keep up on Saleen.

      Look at the history of Saleens, no 5.0 Saleen did that stock. The new Saleens (Since the S7) are complete re-works of the cars (ground up) intead of performance add-ons.

      I'd still say he was lying out his ass saying he had a stock Saleen doing 11. I had a friend with an 1989 that was hitting around 14.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Infact by geek · · Score: 2

      Dude read the post, I conceded he wasnt in an SR, jesus talk about jumping the fucking gun

  64. Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Not exactly...Mel is a walking poster boy for wearing your SPF 30 sunscreen. He got a LOT of sun in his youth. Now he looks like a hunk...of rawhide.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about $1Million? Would it REALLY fucking cramp Mel's style? Or Tom Cruise's?

      Why are you blaming the actors? What are they supposed to do, say "No thanks, that's too much money"?

      If Mel Gibson can attract enough people to the movie to make that much money, who should get the money?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh come on! how naiive are you? actors have AGENTS, usually the same ones as OTHER ACTORS ( thus controlling the supply side of "stars" to the studios). If the studios tried giving us films based on interesting ideas instead of bankable "stars" and franchises, we'd all be better served.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Everyone's free to use sunscreen... by medscaper · · Score: 3, Funny
      who should get the money?

      The Movie execs!

      Or Hilary Rosen, if they're not around.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  65. Hey, at least RW gave us by zrk · · Score: 2

    Virginia Hey, the touch female warrior who later went on to play Farscape's Pa'u Zotoh Zhaan!

    MMBT only gave us Tina Turner in a metal Bikini - attractive, but not quite the same thing!

  66. Re:what is NSA? duh by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

    NSA: No Such Agency

  67. This is covered with red flags... by X_Caffeine · · Score: 3

    $25m = Can you name a single movie where the lead made that kind of $$ that was actually any good? I'd rather see Guy Pearce (Memento) or Bruce Campbell get paid $1m to play Max.

    "highly polished" == script-writing by committee, always a good sign.

    "script has been in the works for 3 years" = "The first draft sucked. The second draft sucked too. 37 drafts later, we still think it might suck, but then, we're the kind of jerks who will put a script through three years worth of rewrites before shooting a lame horse."

    My suggestion for the title: "Mad Max Resurrection." I wanna be optimistic, but oh man this looks bad...

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    1. Re:This is covered with red flags... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 3, Informative
      $25m = Can you name a single movie where the lead made that kind of $$ that was actually any good? I'd rather see Guy Pearce (Memento) or Bruce Campbell get paid $1m to play Max.

      The Sixth Sense. Bruce Willis made a hell of a lot of money on that film, and it was an amazing piece of work. I think that's from having a percentage of the gross, though.

      I really don't know whether this will be any good or not, but I'm certainly willing to give it a chance. We'll see...

  68. Profit-to-cost ratios by Shenkerian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which ratio statistic are you questioning? The Blair Witch Project got over a 2300:1 profit-to-cost ratio.. Two orders of magnitude larger than the 37:1 from the butterfly project you mentioned, and one order of magnitude larger than Mad Max's 250:1.

    --
    You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    1. Re:Profit-to-cost ratios by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Does that count the 800-bazillion dollars they spent hyping the thing once they realized they had a hit on their hands?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  69. Script? by BryanL · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Apparently the script has been in the works for 3 years and is highly polished"

    I have read childrens books to my four year old that have had more words than the first three movies combined. What can there be to polish?

  70. Sheesh. by irn_bru · · Score: 2

    A big fan of all 3 Mad Max Films eh?

    You also like to compare apples, oranges and lemons?

  71. Feral Kid = New Leader by Slur · · Score: 2

    Remember that at the end of "Road Warrior" it is revealed that the feral kid grows up to be the leader of the tribe that escapes to the coast, and he narrates the last part of the movie. So it wouldn't be out of the question for Max to run into the feral kid again, except as the grown up leader of the group that so cleverly used him to make their escape.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  72. Re:Yay overrated actors by geek · · Score: 2

    No one deserves 25 million? Thats the most presumptious crap I ever heard.

    These actors/actresses spend months away from family and friends on shoots, they spend decades learning their trade (anthony hopkins for an example). They deal with constant press pressure, they have MAJOR expenses in the form of security gaurds because of death threats and stalkers.

    Mel also produces and directs most of the movies he is in.

    These people deserve the money a hell of a lot more than the fat cat do nothing all day CEO's of HP and WorldCom who cook the books and take 5 hour lunches every day to shoot the shit with other crooked execs.

    The elitists are those who claim they deserve the cash more than the ones doing all the work. Sitting in front of a typewritter all day is hardly grueling labor. Guys like Mel do their own stunt work, they do lots of physical acting, tons of travel not to mention the extremely hard work they are put through in promoting the movie.

    You sir are the one who knows nothing about the film industry. Scripts are a dime a dozen. There are only so many ways you can tell the same story, but acting them out is a far more intricate and challenging proffession.

    Good actors save films. There are plenty of badly written movies saved entirely by the cast, look at the majority of the Star Trek movies for this. Look at Ransom starring Mel Gibson. I could give you a list as long as my arm, but I'm pretty sure it still wouldn't convince an elitist prick like you.

    Now take a walk.

  73. An Aussie Ford Falcon... by Soulfader · · Score: 2
    ...which was hella cooler than the domestic variety we got here. A quick Google turned up this reference.

    I saw a Mad Max replicar at a Ford show outside of Portland, OR this summer. VERY shiny. If I had any pictures scanned, I would link them.

    <gratuitous link>
    Instead, gaze at the wondrous beauty that is the 1974 Capri--slightly, ahem, used. =)

  74. Re:Walk away. Just walk away. by geek · · Score: 2

    Or get attacked by some guy with a doll attached to a pole strapped to his back that just doesn't know how to DIE!

  75. Re:But how much are they paying Grace Jones!? by geek · · Score: 3, Funny

    oh god please no, no no no nooooooooooooooooooooooooo

  76. Re:What's the title of that? by T3kno · · Score: 2

    Speaking of I'm still waiting for Spaceballs II: The search for more money. It has to be better than Star Wars Episode 2: The search for more money.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  77. Admit it. You'll all see it. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    It can't be much worse than Episode II.

    Come on. Geeks love movies where stuff blows up. It'll have fire & explosions. Exploding stuff is cool.

    And for those that don't pay $5 to see a matinee, there's always KazAa. :P

  78. Re:Nah ! Halloween was the one by dvdeug · · Score: 2

    See the comment "Profit to cost ratios" above; Mad Max made 250 times the orignal investment.

  79. Re:Mystical overheads by vsprintf · · Score: 2

    After reading all the articles about the MPAA, I think I can explain the $80.2 million discrepancy.

    It's the post-production costs of the accountants tracking the revenue and the salary paid to the studio execs and MPAA execs to dissipate said revenue in support of the industry (read bonuses and wild parties) that suck up all the profit. Can I be a Hollwood consultant now (or do I know too much)?

  80. Re:Mystical overheads by Maul · · Score: 2

    I think the reference was that the movie industry says all their films barely break even, no matter how the movie actually does.

    Senator: Why is it that you think we should give you vigilante abilities to hunt down pirates, at your own discression?

    Movie Exec: Because, Senator! As you can see by our numbers, we're barely breaking even! Chinese street vendors have our movies before they are made and are killing us, even though we don't have a market in China! Without vigilante powers, we won't be able to stay in business much longer. It is our God given right to stay in business, no matter what!

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  81. A relevant quote from the first Mad Max... by jmorse · · Score: 2


    The chain in those handcuffs is high tense metal steel. It will take you ten minutes to hack through it with this. Now If you're lucky... you could hack through your ankle in 5 minutes.


    --

    "You done taken a wrong turn."
    -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
  82. Generation Labels by Dragon213 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gen X: mid-60's to mid-70's
    Gen Lost: mid-70's to mid-80's
    Gen TV: mid-80's to mid-90's
    Gen "I don't give a f&(#, I want everything I want RIGHT NOW!": mid-90's to current

    --
    --CypherDragon
  83. Her name is Sandy by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2

    ^_^

    Sandy Squirrel and Spongebob Squarepants

    So when you draw the heart on a tree or scrawl it in the bathroom, it's S.S. + S.S., which looks real confusing.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  84. LOL! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2

    There was that one episode where S.Bob and Patrick were fighting in a wrestling match and then hugged at the end when they realized they were wearing matching boxers. They touched each other's asses, crying.

    It's corrupting America's youth, I say! Excellent...

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  85. Mad max? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    They should make it in IMAX !!!

  86. Sandy just needs a new wardrobe. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 2

    Then she'd have a hand up over Lara Croft. Hell, all girls from Texas are lookers, you know that.

    This phenomenon is widespread. Cartoons are just as accessable any hottie movie or recording star... they aren't! So the obsession has nothing to do with "getting out". The possibilities of realizing the fantasy are of the same magnitude.
    Hell, most guys find me attractive for no reason at all. I'm NOT REAL!!!! Oedipus complex I guess. I'm a mental fuck toy for the whole otaku crowd. So the cartoon squirrel, that's not even a stretch.
    I'd be more worried about obsession with REAL inanimate objects, like automobiles, stereo equipment, or pies and canned meats.

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  87. Re: New Mad Max Film by buzzbomb · · Score: 2

    Going along with the Spaceballs theme, would this be:

    Mad Max 4: The Search for More Money?

  88. Branding by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No actor is worth $25M. It's branding, not talent. I'm surprised that Hollywood hasn't figured out a way around that problem.

    Some years ago, a friend of mine dragged me backstage at a major rock concert during setup, and I was hearing how the show had two sets of equipment and props, leap-frogging each other from city to city, with one group in setup while another was in teardown. I was talking to one of the promoter's financial people, and said, "So why not have two sets of musicians. Cats has two road companies. Barnum and Bailey Circus has two units. There have been rock groups where, over time, all the members of the band were replaced. And nobody can see those guys on stage (this was in a football stadium, and before big-screen projectors) anyway. Your costs will go up by only 20-30%, but revenue will double." He looked very thoughtful for a while.

    Someday, Clear Channel will probably pull this off.

  89. Re:VHS tapes by cskoien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The new movie better not be dubbed into "American English" prior to release over in the states, like the first Mad Max. Australian english isn't that bloody hard to understand! Hands up whose seen the original Aussie version?

  90. Oh Boy! Just Like Star Wars! by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Will Jar-Jar be in this?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  91. Ugh. by Wheaty18 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This'll be just like Terminator 3...

    Instead of "I'll be back." .... "Ach, my back!"

  92. What about USD 25M? by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 2

    Or do we need to start the whole discussion again?

  93. A tear of joy! by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    This may be the end of the world coming on. Road Warrior was my introduction to all things good. I watch it at least once a week....(Mad Max about once a month -- and I throw thunderdome in every few months.) No other movie announcment could make me happier. Will we live to see it complete?

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  94. Kraftwerk by davevr · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe Kraftwerk did this a few decades ago... They were an entirely electronic band, and would give "live" performances with just automatons on stage. Good Stuff!!

    "I am the operator / with my pocket calculator"

    oops, I am indicating my age... :-(

    1. Re:Kraftwerk by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      well, then you would be thrilled to hear what aphex twin pulled out once, afaik/iirc/i heard from a friend; the guy has done only few gigs, because he sees little point in doing them because he doesnt play live anyways. but if you give him enough money sure, he'll do it. he arrived at this gig place, popped in the cd, pushed play and left.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  95. Re:Walk away. Just walk away. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    here's the problem that i see with "polished"

    I jsut got back from disney land a few hours ago.

    Here is my take on the "polishing" of Disneyland:

    it used to be a theme park. you would go there, eat some candy - ride some rides - and see a few charcters that you loved from disney cartoons.

    now space mountain is "brought to you by FedEX" and there are fedex adds all through out the line in the add - and the ride actually exits you right into a store (as does star tours - which is brought to you by enegizer - and there are energizer bunny ads on the walls.)

    coca-cola is everywhere. they sell McDonalds from the McDonalds chuck wagon in frontier land. Disney Downtown is a shopping complex and the strollers.

    It was an army of families with strollers and nothing but advertisments.

    I took my wife there as she had never been before - and it was my birthday. I thought it would be fun for her first time - and a throwback to the more than 15-20 years since I had been there as a kid. BIG mistake. I wont even take our soon to be kids there.

    So much for the polished idea of a theme park.

    just because something was good years ago - does not mean that any amount of polishing on the idea is going to make it good now. The idea of Disneyland no longer exists. the idea that a good movie from the early 80's can get a decent attempt at a sequel of any number in this day and age without product placement and mechandising rights and affiliations is about as slim.

  96. Violence and sex is a sure hit worldwide... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    That's why so many violent action movies are being made. Basic themes of violence, revenge, and sex resonate with all people in all cultures. So these movies are a sure hit everywhere in the world no matter what -- language and other cultural factors don't matter. Everyone can understand them, from uptight Scandinavian PhD's to spearchucking bushmen. No matter how much they cost to make, they eventually make money. Add to that the potential for violent video games based on them, plus merchandising, and the profits can be truly enourmous. Not to mention the generations of college students who will rent them to "laugh at" how "bad" they are, pretending to have some higher-level sense of "irony"...

  97. What do you know by Dusabre · · Score: 2

    Overrated?

    Seems you don't know a thing about the film business you're part-time part of.

    Its the actors that bring in the viewers.

    The viewers bring in the money.

    Thus the actors are a lot more important (in bottom-line terms) than the directors, producers, editors, cinematographers, screenwriters, though the film as such may be a team effort and may involve more work from other people than from the actors. Even if the film would look and feel the same with a different actor, its the actor (in the case of films with A-list actors) that gets the butts in the seats.

    There are some directors and producers that have name value and are 'bankable' (Lucas, Spielberg) but their value is less than that of actors. 'Bankable' means that if you have Mel Gibson, Tom Cruise, Harrison Ford or De Niro (A-list) in a film, you (producer) can count on getting the money you threw at the film back. That's why the A-list actors get paid so much.

    Or in slashdot friendly terms:
    1) Get Tom Cruise,
    2) Make film with Tom Cruise,
    3) Profit.

    Of course stage 2.5 which involves a bad script, bad directing and bad filming could get in the way of 3) but most film studios are pretty competent in avoiding making 'bad' films except where religion (Battlefield Earth), ego (Waterworld) or idiocy (Showgirls) overrule the clever people in studio accounting and preproduction.

    If you still don't agree with me, check out the film posters. Whose name is written in the largest font? And why?

  98. Accents by 1u3hr · · Score: 2
    Actually, Mad Max 2 (a.k.a The Road Warrior) was in the Australian accent. Mad Max (1) was dubbed with the American accent...until the Special Edition DVD came out.

    Of course Mad Max, as it was released in Australia, was in Australian. IIIRC, it was released for the drive-in circuit in the US, and they thought rednecks needed to have it dubbed into yank, and retitled ("Road Warrior") so as to make it more easily digestible.

    When in Hong Kong I saw it on TV I was gobsmacked. Most of the cast are well-known Aussie character actors, and to hear some American voice-over artist messing up their delivery was painful and humiliating.

  99. Original Mad Max cost less than 1/50th of a Gibson by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    And dare I say, Mel 2002 isn't worth 1/50 of a Mad Max.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  100. The ultimate product promotion movie! by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mad Max - Segway Warrior

    Opening scene - Max "roaring" down the road on his super-charged Segway surrounded by hoards of baddies. We see Max being hit multiple times, reeling from the shock of each blow, but he just keeps going.

    Baddie #1 - Curse that Segway, if we could just knock Max down we'd be able to ravage the orphanage and take over that oil refinery...

    (You can take it from there though I recommend that you don't. :-D )

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  101. Re:Her name is Sandy CHEEKS. by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    Sandy Squirrel and Spongebob Squarepants.

    Not Squirrel, Cheeks.

    Yes, I have 3.5 children.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  102. Whazzah? by ianscot · · Score: 2
    So, let's see -- pop-cultural decline as measured by the "spirit" of the Mad Max movies, is it?

    Wimpy, who was addicted to hamburgers (a stand-in for alcohol in those more sensitive times).

    Those more sensitive times? You're saying it's imaginable, today, to have a popular kids' cartoon where being a drunk is funny? If anything we'd be much quicker to find that offensive now, wouldn't we? (Dick Van Dyke used to do a great drunk on his show, very funny -- until he got sober in real life.)

    Spongebob Squarepants, who epitomizes and glorifies chronic laziness and disrespect for authority...

    Spongebob squarepants ain't an influence on Generation X, and I'm having trouble thinking of who you mean by "like" spongebob for them. If you wanted a weird choice to do with the drug culture, you might have chosen "H.R. Puffinstuff" -- now THERE was a thinly veiled drug reference, huh? As far as "obviously gay" fictional characters, the first one I can remember was Monroe on a lame sitcom called Too Close for Comfort... hardly a huge cultural milestone, and not much of a formative role model for anyone really.

    The Mad Max movies were okay fun -- they did have a low budget thing going on at first, and I sort of dread sitting through what's sure to be a lavish, CGI-beefed reprise. But cultural belleweathers they aren't. If this one sucks, it'll be because it got made for money rather than fun.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.