Slashdot Mirror


Video Streaming Goes Peer-to-Peer

CMU ESM Project writes "Our research group at Carnegie Mellon University has developed a peer to peer streaming video content distribution system called End System Multicast (ESM). The system constructs a self-organizing and adaptive overlay network using the receivers that are tuning into the broadcast events. The system has been used fairly successfully for quite a few events. Now we want test the system with a lot of more users and different user join patterns. We are streaming some very cool video, such as Triumph of the Nerds by Bob Cringely, distinguished lecture by Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, ACM SIGCOMM conference paper presentation by Dave Clark, and 2002 Sony Legged Robot Soccer Championship. Here is the detailed schedule. So please tune in, enjoy, and help test our system!" The streaming is based on QuickTime; for Linux users, the project page steps through installation of CodeWeaver's CrossOver plug-in.

50 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. uhhh... by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are streaming some very cool video

    If you wanna grab the /. communities attention, I'd suggest you show Ghost in a Shell, RMS vs MS PR lecturer, the Matrix, and The Two Towers.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:uhhh... by Soko · · Score: 2

      I beg to disagree. Think Jennicam.
      'Nuf said.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:uhhh... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Think Jennicam

      They want streaming video tests, not static pages of an empty chair.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  2. Prepare to hear from the MPAA by gambit3 · · Score: 2

    They're sure not gonna like this.

    1. Re:Prepare to hear from the MPAA by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My response: "Tough shit. Welcome to the future".

      The fundamental problem with true video-on-demand is at the server end. Sure, you can stagger showings like todays PPV systems, but the viewer cannot pause, rewind and fast-forward.

      P2P solves this. As much bandwidth as you need. The more popular a piece of media becomes, the easier it is to get. A reverse slashdot effect. It's a much more elegant solution compared to throwing bandwidth and server capacity at the problem. Put P2P in a TIVO, it's just gained a second killer app. The only problem is that if two users record the same show, they will not be HASH compatible, which is essential for a good multi-point downloading p2p network. Solve that, you've just reinvented how broadcast TV works.

      The MPAA and RIAA are just going to have to accept that they can no longer control our media. We have the tools and we have the technology to do it ourselves.

      Only lawyers can try stop us now. And if they do, our countries will have so much civil disobedience and lack of respect for the law that the war on (some) drugs pales in significance.

    2. Re:Prepare to hear from the MPAA by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, Video on Demand is already being done successfully by Time Warner Cable in New York. I agree P2P ends up being much cheaper and easier, but don't make it like it can't be done. Besides, true video on demand lets you watch something whenever you want. Streaming P2P does not, it's like a broadcast. You can't go back and watch from the beginning. And not only that, the more people watching this "live" broadcast, the more lag you'll have.

      I think this stuff is great, but you can't compare it to video on demand. And if you saw "Peer-to-peer" and though "Kazaa," the I also agree with you; Kazaa is great, and peer-to-peer is the future. Your post doesn't belong in this story though.

    3. Re:Prepare to hear from the MPAA by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Umm, Video on Demand is already being done successfully by Time Warner Cable in New York.

      Is it real video on demand, where every user can select a show and watch it that instant, or is it like most systems where the show is broadcast on, say 12 channels, with each one starting 5 mins appart? If the later, it's not VOD. With real VOD, you have a private stream from the provider, which requires a massive server.

      Streaming P2P does not, it's like a broadcast.

      We're at cross purposes here, methinks. The example that this article links to is a repeater p2p network, which is pretty neat. However, I was describing a system where it's fully on demand. Jeez, if it wasn't for the .avi file format having important data at the end of the file, you could almost do this now on the existing p2p apps. All you need is enough bandwidth to watch the video in realtime. You wouldn't be able to jump 30 minutes in if you wanted, but that's only because the current p2p clients haven't even thought of that yet.

      Give it a year or two... ;-)

      Your post doesn't belong in this story though

      Well, what I'm thinking of isn't quite a p2p repeater as described in article, but it's similar and they share a few traits. For example, imagine I am watching an episode of the Simpsons on my node. That episode will be getting cached on my system, and thus will be available to other users from me. That concept is in keeping with the article. I'm just removing the need to have defined broadcasts, limiting when and what you can watch.

  3. Wow by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Funny

    P2P streaming video, eh? We *KNOW* which industry is going to be the frontrunner there. And for some reason, the geeks will all be very generous in the uh, "support" they offer.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  4. No Support for Mac?? by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They state that they are using quicktime.. yet there is no support for Mac. ?!

    --
    magnanomous.
    1. Re:No Support for Mac?? by ChrisPalow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We have macos x port running internally with some issues (you have to pause and play everytime you switch from low->high or high->low video streams) but other then that it works ok. So yes there is a MacOS X port. There is no, nor are there any plans for, a MacOS 9 port.

      Chris

  5. Um yeah, there'll be mass-market demand... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We are streaming some very cool video, such as Triumph of the Nerds by Bob Cringely, distinguished lecture by Eric Schmidt, CEO of Google, ACM SIGCOMM conference paper presentation by Dave Clark, and 2002 Sony Legged Robot Soccer Championship."

    We want ... PORN!

    1. Re:Um yeah, there'll be mass-market demand... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "We want... PORN!"

      Funny? Heh I'm serious guys. I don't care about Triumph of the Nerds. I don't care about the Sony Legged Robot Soccer Championshiip. But if they feed down porn, hell yeah I'm going to jump through some hoops to get it to work!

      I'm not +1 Funny whoring here, I'm bored with the porn I've got and don't feel like running my credit card up higher!

  6. MPAA raid! by dex22 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a shock move, the MPAA closed several University research departments this afternoon, in a series of commando-style raids.

    "It's tantamount to theft" said Hilarity Rosen. "People sharing video and film clips like this without paying? It's immoral, unjust and illegal! Luckily, we caught the equivalent of 7,562 illegal viewers. (Well, we caught 17, but they all had VERY fast connections!)

    In other news, Microsoft tommorow will announce a new DSigital Rights system for P2P video, called "PayNow!"

    1. Re:MPAA raid! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I actually heard Hilary Rosen on the radio monday night on KGO. she said "They have a CD Burner - which is the equivalent of a CD production facility"

  7. this was done years ago by dan501 · · Score: 4, Informative

    blue falcon networks has been doing this for quite a while.

    their technology is already in such distribution systems as Virgin's internet radio broadcast

    they do live re-multicast as well as on-demand.

    they rock the casbah.

    --
    my livejournal is interesting and worth reading - I swear. I know everyone thinks their blog is interesting. mine is.
  8. But... by sulli · · Score: 2

    if you want to grab the public's attention, show porn. I guarantee that porn will be the killer app for this (remember CU-SeeMe).

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  9. Recompile Kernel? WTF? by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    You most certainly do *not* have to recompile your kernel to use QT in mplayer. Just build it, download the codecs .zip, and go

    BTW, for debian users, here are the lines to install mplayer (WITH qt6 support):

    echo "deb http://marillat.free.fr/ unstable main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
    apt-get update
    apt-get install mplayer-686 mencoder-686 qt6codecs w32codecs

  10. BitTorrent? by jcr · · Score: 2

    Can anyone fill me in on how or if this differs from the BitTorrent concept?

    http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:BitTorrent? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Informative

      BitTorrent is a great tool for file downloading, but it doesn't do live streaming.

  11. Peer to peer in the geek community is an oxymoron. by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Funny

    No self-respecting geek believes any other person to be geeky enough to be considered their "peer."

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  12. Cool. by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Watching it now. Pretty cool, and pretty effective - but the video seems a little bit too bright.

  13. Mac Support Coming Soon! .... sortof .... by gabe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I'm a little peeved at that too. I'm a geek and I don't get to enjoy this project because for some reason they've neglected the NATIVE PLATFORM for the streaming product they're using.

    However, there IS a note stating that they are "explorting porting to the MacOS" I think they meant "exploring", and even if they do explore it, are they talking about Mac OS 9 or OSX?

    I want to play :(

    --
    Gabriel Ricard
  14. "We are streaming some very cool video" by tmark · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd be hard-pressed to call what they were streaming "cool". If they wanted cool, they should have been streaming video out cams hidden in the ventilation registers of good-looking coed's dorm rooms. Oh wait, I forgot, they're at Carnegie Mellon.

    Which reminds me of an old, old joke: Nine out of ten girls in California are good-looking. The other one goes to Stanford.

  15. Cool i-candy by Doodhwala · · Score: 5, Informative


    Check out their overlay tree here. It shows how the current peer-to-peer tree of everyone viewing anything at that given point in time. Pretty cool.

  16. No Video on Demand? by hirebrand · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Here is the detailed schedule.

    Um, if I wanted to watch video on a schedule, I'd watch TV.

    1. Re:No Video on Demand? by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      Thank you for participating in the TV reception load test.

      Our results were:

      1. TV reception did appear to work correctly, independently of the number of people receiving the broadcast
      2. Most people were wrong in their guesses about who shot J.R.
      We could not have done it without the help of viewers like you. Thank you.

      We also hope that you will participate in our next high-load performance test, the M*A*S*H series finale.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:No Video on Demand? by Snaller · · Score: 2

      Um, if I wanted to watch video on a schedule, I'd watch TV.


      If you lived close enough to the transmitter to be able to receive the signal. No vision there boy.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:No Video on Demand? by Degrees · · Score: 2
      On the one hand, you have a point. On the other, I missed the Cringley shows when they came across broadcast TV, so now I get to see them. If this is a running loop, then I get to tap in when I want - which is more than I get with TV.

      Further, I can't surf /. on my TV, and I get to help some researchers tweak / improve multicast. Seems like multicast is the hot topic at ACM SIGCOMM today - which makes me think we are in "internet-delivered-video-on-demand" infancy.

      Its funny, at the moment, Eric Schmidt is discussing his contemplation of the future, and multicast is not (yet) a part of his talk.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  17. Standards! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    If they were using H.263 or MPEG-4, you should be able to use a variety of players instead of needing the Crossover hack.

  18. Some answers.. by ChrisPalow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi all, I work on the project and have been tasked with answering the slashdot communities questions. 1. Bright video: yes the video is too bright just has to do with the video capture we did of this particular video. Other videos look better, check the schedule. 2. Why codeweavers? Mplayer plays Sorenson 1 natively and Sorenson 3 using a binary codec, we can broadcast either. Unforutunately, Mplayer's RTP code doesn't support Sorenson 1/3 streams yet. When looking at the code, I couldn't tell if live.com streaming library didn't support it yet or, more likely, the interface between mplayer and live.com streaming library doesn't support Sorenson 1/3. 3. I'll answer more of how the system works and how its different then bittorrent and other system in a few minutes it's going to take while to type out. In the mean time check out some of our documents. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~ESM-streaming/docs/ESM_Ph aseII.1.pdf is a bried overview. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/cmcl-yhchu/ www.overlays/ has some of our earlier papers Chris Palow palow@cmu.edu

    1. Re:Some answers.. by Gropo · · Score: 2

      4. The Macintosh alpha should be ready for download around ______ from now.

      (pretty please? We OS X lUsers want to play too)

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  19. Quite a Test by Bobman1235 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we want test the system with a lot of more users and different user join patterns.

    Is this the first case of someone actually ASKING to be Slashdotted? I can't think of a better stress test... :)

    1. Re:Quite a Test by ChrisPalow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yes we're asking to be slashdotted. We've been planning this for several months

  20. Plead for Money by Shamanin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Every couple of minutes the screen blanks out with a message saying things like "Please send 24.95 for the full version to support starving programmers" for crossover.

    How annoying... they should've mentioned this.

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  21. Oxymoron by mocm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't peer to peer multicast kind of an oxymoron.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    1. Re:Oxymoron by mocm · · Score: 2

      Ok, so like p2p2p2p2p2p2... -> p2m
      But when you already have the possibility for multicast, why not just add something to that, to ensure transmission in case of lost packages, like asking a host closer to the sender if it has the required data.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
  22. Tell M$! by lennart78 · · Score: 2

    They finally have proof that TOC with Windows is lower than with Linux :)

  23. Re:QuickTime? No thanks. It Sucks. by smokin_juan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have NEVER seen a stable installation of quicktime and I'll be damned if I install it on my new machine.

    It's a damn shame too because I've been waiting for this idea to materialize for a while. Maybe the next bunch of folks who take a stab at it won't fuck it up.

    pfft. qucktime. what a fucking waste.

  24. Graph of the Slashdot Effect by SB5 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  25. Didn't read the article by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2


    How is this different from video teleconferencing software like CU-SeeMe, which has been around for about 8 years now?

  26. Simple hack around by Shamanin · · Score: 2

    If you move the window slightly, the splash-beg moves to behind it. Still annoying, but manageable.

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  27. Re:Quicktime - no way jose by damiam · · Score: 3, Informative
    Quicktime is an open streaming video format. It's completely documented on Apple's web site, and is the basis for the MPEG-4 file-format. The only closed part are the Sorenson and QDesign codecs, which aren't Apple's responsibility (and may or may not be what these guys are using).

    What "open" system would you ahve in mind? Ogg Tarkin? Maybe it'll kick ass in 5 years. Until then, Quicktime is one of the best choices.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  28. Interesting ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Funny
    Problem MPAA and RIAA have far too much free bandwidth and DoS attacks are now the new "internet attack" preference.

    Step 1. Release story on highly visited website that will cause geeks to download before even realizing the trojan horse they have installed.

    Step 2. Get geeks to keep player on by telling them they will help the greater good of p2p video streaming.

    Step 3. When over 20,000 active nodes are on system begin largest DoS attack ever on MPAA and RIAA that will strike fear into the masses.

    Step 4. Profit^H^H^H^H^H^H Post story on slashdot about how slashdot users defeated the evil of the internet without even knowing it.

    It may seem highly unlikely, but shouldn't these freekin college kids be studying for finals??? Anyone else think this is an "odd" type of program??

    I could be wrong and I probably am, but it's a hypothetical that could be very true ...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  29. Re:I quote: by Gropo · · Score: 2
    We chose quicktime because its open protocol, so we could understand it and manipulate the RTP stream without having to worry about reverse engineering etc.
    I suspect that the Darwin Streaming Server being Free-as-in-Premium-Lager - and that its author doesn't demand any 'server tax' to run it - helped in that decision as well?
    --
    I hate Grammar Nazi's
  30. Re:Bandwidth Concern by ChrisPalow · · Score: 2, Informative

    it's about 400Kbps down then 400Kbps up for each of your children. Right now the maximum number of children is 6 so.. 2400Kbps.
    For a total of 2800Kbps or 350KBps up + down

    Hopefully 350KBps doesn't get you kicked out (of school?!?) if it does drop me a line

    Chris

  31. Audio P2P running by Openadvocate · · Score: 2

    I have seen that Digitally Imported has a audio P2P option from allcast.
    I am not using it personally as I am listening to the shoutcast streams on my Audiotron, so I don't know if it's worth anything, but the idea is nice.

    --
    my sig
  32. Re:QuickTime? No thanks. It Sucks. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I have NEVER seen a stable installation of quicktime and I'll be damned if I install it on my new machine.

    Knowing how to install an OS and apps would go a long way toward solving your QuickTime problems. Of all of the media players on the market, QuickTime is the one that's caused me the least grief. I currently run it on Win2K, and I've used it under different flavors of Win9x. (I also have a Quadra 610 with MacOS 7.5.3, but I've never tried to track down an older version of QuickTime to install on it. I'm not sure how useful it'd be on such a slow machine.)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  33. So does this mean... by Snaller · · Score: 2

    ... that american geeks will now start to stream all the new TV shows, and the rest of the world will be looking over their shoulders? (While the industry starts screaming in fury?)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  34. hey! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    Step 5 is missing. There's no step 5. There's no Step 5!!!!

  35. Unable to parse ESM config file by telstar · · Score: 2

    That's where my P2P video experience ended.

    Oh well ... NEXT!