Slashdot Mirror


Ultimate Webcam: Rent Time On A CCD Telescope

leighklotz writes "I saw an ad for this in Science News and visited the site: http://www.arnierosner.com offers CCD-based telescopes that you control, from his mountaintop in Arizona. $50 for an hour's tiem gets you started. Too bad I hadn't read this last week when Saturn's rings were at their peak." I bet this gives some entrepreneurial ideas ...

77 comments

  1. This will revolutionize... by bahwi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! This will revolutionize the desktop background industry! Talk about Innovative!

    1. Re:This will revolutionize... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2

      "This will revolutionize the desktop background industry!"

      xplanet.sourceforge.net

  2. Other targets by C.Maggard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would've paid that to see the Leonid shower; I was under cloud cover at the time. If he can set up a few more sites to have more guarantee of clear skies, then I can see this turning into a viable service for amateur astronomers.

    1. Re:Other targets by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Leonid shower

      Through a telescope?

      Maybe if he set up some wide angle lenses or something.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Other targets by jridley · · Score: 3, Informative

      Telescopes, heck, even binoculars are useless in a meteor shower, except for what they're good for every day. You want naked eye for meteor showers.

    3. Re:Other targets by Helter · · Score: 2

      You can't get a whole lot better than Arizona for clear skies. They get precipitation in Tucson about twice a year (although it's for a month each time).

  3. Lenoid shower? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget that! Does something like that have the resolution to peer into my hot neighbour's shower? :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Lenoid shower? by seann · · Score: 1

      maybe if you had balls you could peek into your hot neighbours shower.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Lenoid shower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this technology age it seems like nobody tries to get laid anymore, stop peaking and knock on the door you cowards.

    3. Re:Lenoid shower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, what ever happened to "Nice shoes, wanna fuck?"

    4. Re:Lenoid shower? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

      Actually, no. Unless your hot neighbor happens to be 15 meters or so across. At least that was the figure i got quoted about the Hubble..probably larger for earth based....

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:Lenoid shower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like a great idea. I'm gonna go try it now...Warning!!! Above Mentioned method has serious flaws!

      You put knocked out teeth in milk, right?

    6. Re:Lenoid shower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yah, what ever happened to "Nice shoes, wanna fuck?"

      AIDS. Not that you didn't already know that.

  4. Groovy pics by rye+bean · · Score: 1

    I would think that the delay between transmission and recieving would have been too great for *simultanous* control, but this could really prove useful, eg: normal scientist could make observations while on earth. Plus you could get some pretty groovy pics :)

    --
    I prefer MS Windows to Linux
    1. Re:Groovy pics by mesach · · Score: 1

      as opposed to all those Abnormal scientists that make observations while in space.?

      or mutant earthbound scientists?

      sorry had to bait

      --
      moo.
  5. hmm by Slashdotess · · Score: 3, Funny

    based on this picture i sure hope he's not getting any rain out there!

    1. Re:hmm by TheMooX · · Score: 1

      He's in the desert. "It's very dry."

    2. Re:hmm by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 2

      A lot of amature observatories have roofs that roll off. Based on that picture I'd be willing to guess that it's the same way here.

      Here's an example.

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
  6. Now *that's* remote control ... 8^} by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2


    "http://www.arnierosner.com offers CCD-based telescopes that you control, from his mountaintop in Arizona."

    It would suck to have to travel to his remote mountaintop just to control the thing though ;^} Now that's remote control! 8^}

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  7. It will eventually stop working... by sxpert · · Score: 1, Funny

    when rain falls on the computers, that are outside...
    check the photo here

    1. Re:It will eventually stop working... by deft · · Score: 2

      what good are big ass telescopes if you cant see some clouds coming?

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  8. entrepreneurial ideas? by happystink · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    What ideas does this give people? To set up their own telescopes you mean, or to use these in some sort of enterprising way?

    --

    sig:
    See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

  9. in related news... by deft · · Score: 3, Funny

    the earth aimed telescopic camera pointed at my neighbors window is still for rent at a much cheaper $29.95 an hour.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  10. I wasted 50 bucks!!! by dagg · · Score: 1, Funny
    Ok. I sent the guy 50 bucks, he sent me the URL and then I go to the web site and wait for "my turn". I hit reload every once and a while and it still tells me it's not my turn. After about 15 hours, the computer beeps at me and says: "She's all yers buddy, you get the controls for 60 minutes. Starting NOW"! But by then it was 3 o'clock in the afternoon!

    just kidding

    --
    Sex - Find It
  11. Saturn's Rings by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Too bad I hadn't read this last week when Saturn's rings were at their peak

    It's okay, they took the pictures for you... http://www.arnierosner.com/ccd/wallpaper/saturn/ (Actually those are older, sometime before Oct. 11, but they're still sweet.)

    1. Re:Saturn's Rings by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep, those do look kinda familiar.

      Saturn was at opposition last week, and thus as close as it can get to Earth. However, the view will be favourable until well in to the new year (it starts to deteriorate in April).

      The rings will remain at about their maximum tilt for a couple of years yet. It's far from the all-or-nothing-one-night-in-a-lifetime spectacle the science news folks would have you believe. Try JPL's Solar System Simulator to see how slowly the rings change. Saturn's 29.5 year orbit, y'know.

      I had an excellent view last night while testing a new telescope, and saw four moons while I was at it. I expect to see the rings well until 2007 or so.

      ...laura

    2. Re:Saturn's Rings by HangHigh · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but these are old pictures. Saturns rings are much more inclined then that.

  12. Not so big by zer0vector · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the only telescopes he has are the ones in the picture there, its not much to write home about. The largest looked like about 8 inch aperture. I understand this is probably more aperture than alot of people have (I have a paltry 4.5), but then I always thought the fun of astrophotography was going out and spending all night up taking your own pictures. Braving the cold for 10 hours sure can be rewarding when you get your finished product.

    --

    ----
    Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    1. Re:Not so big by specialized_sworks · · Score: 3, Informative

      Try again... 300mm (about 11inches). Goes for about $15000US.

      http://www.buytelescopes.com/product.asp?t=&pid= 15 51&m=35

      No comment on braving the cold.

      -Dubby

    2. Re:Not so big by Tri0de · · Score: 1

      Takahashi = Sweet.
      Taka's are about as much as you can spend on a scope of a given aperture.

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
    3. Re:Not so big by arnierosner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually the larger instrument is a 12 inch reflecting scope with a focal length of 141 inches. The smaller widefield instrument is a 6 inch refractor. One of the finest ever built. It's focal length is 1050 MM's

  13. Where is he? by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    Not being really sharp on description by lat and long, where the heck is the observatory? Maybe one you fellow /.ers who is smarter about these things can tell me.

    I'm curious because I live in Flagstaff.

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
    1. Re:Where is he? by ewithrow · · Score: 1

      Flagstaff is 242 miles (389 km) north-northwest of his location :)

    2. Re:Where is he? by azpenguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe he's in the Benson area. I live in Tucson, and I checked his map coordinates... my city mapbook stops east at 110 E 24 M which is about Mescal, seven miles west of Benson. There is, by the way, a Bed & Beakfast in Benson that caters to starwatchers. I figure he's on the east side of the San Pedro River. Great spot. Not that the skywatching in Northern AZ sucks at all, either. Get a bit away from the Flagstaff lights, and the view is awesome.

    3. Re:Where is he? by qqtortqq · · Score: 4, Informative

      He should be right in the middle of this map:

      map.

    4. Re:Where is he? by arnierosner · · Score: 1

      The observatory is located about 45 miles SE of Tucson. Near the city of Saint David.

  14. Ultimate Webcam? by core+plexus · · Score: 2
    Really? Ultimate for when? For whom? I can log on to space.com and many other sites, like NASA, and keep the $50 in my pocket. To me, it's no more "ultimate" than the White House Dog Cam, which I also did not visit.

    Ultimate is not here yet.

    "Score 0-Offtopic"

    1. Re:Ultimate Webcam? by moncyb · · Score: 2

      It seems the big difference is that you can control where the telescope points. As far as I know, NASA doesn't let you do that. ;-)

    2. Re:Ultimate Webcam? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      To me, it's no more "ultimate" than the White House Dog Cam, which I also did not visit.

      whitehouse.com or whitehouse.gov? I suspect $50 may be a bit much for a 'dog cam', but who knows?

      Amazing how much pay for pr0n these days..

  15. Why Bother? by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So you pay 50 dollars to get a jpg of a celestial phenomenon. Why bother, when there are plenty of much better quality images of pretty much the whole sky (not to mention Hubble pictures, etc) to be downloaded for free? It's not like you can photograph the crab nebula from different angles or something.

  16. why bother posting on slashdot by rebelcool · · Score: 5, Insightful
    when you know nothing about the topic being discussed?

    There are plenty of astronomical phenomena which you cannot get pictures (at least not good ones) available for free. If you're a serious amateur astronomer (as this caters to), and are interested in investigating a particular area of space in detail, you need some damn good photos.

    Damn good photos are not available to public, and they are not cheap. Professional astronomers pay hundreds of dollars for a few shots of an eclipsing binary system they may be studying. If you're an amateur who wants this kind of thing, its simply not available.

    --

    -

  17. What is "tiem?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is "tiem?"

    1. Re:What is "tiem?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      TIEM = Total Information Exchange Mechanism

      Basically, "an hour's TIEM" means that the FBI will turn off their surveillance of you for one hour.

      This is a great way for the government to make a little extra money, and for us to maintain a little privacy in the post-9/11 world. There's "time" and then there's "TIEM" (cute little marketing gimmick there).

      For instance, for only $150, I've got a 3-hour block of TIEM set up later tonight for when my girlfriend's over. I really don't want the spooks peeking in when we're hitting it freaky-style, you know what I mean?

  18. Isn't that what the x10 cam is for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... thats what all the popups allude to anyway

  19. Old news by jridley · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are actually dozens of robotic telescopes that you can rent time on. Kitt Peak has had rental scopes accessible in various ways, including through Software Bisque's software for years. Amateurs have even built their own robotic telescopes and placed them in dark locations, then run them via the internet or dialup (actually just as good for single users)

  20. He's in a great spot by azpenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live about 40 miles east of this guy. The skies out here at night are amazing. I live in Tucson, which is the nearest big city, and which is also close to Kitt Peak, a renowned observatory. Due to the importance of Kitt Peak, Tucson has strict outdoor lighting ordinances. Lights have to face downward, certain types of lights are prohibited, etc. As a result you have pretty good star views even in the middle of the city. And it also means that his scopes don't suffer light pollution problems (40 miles may seem like a long way, but you can see the lights of Phoenix clouding the sky from 100 miles off) from any city lights. You get just a little out of town, and you get fantastic viewing. We also don't get clouded over very often.

    1. Re:He's in a great spot by SunPin · · Score: 1

      I wish more cities had strict lighting laws. Tere is no valid reason for the US to look like a damn prison when the sun goes down. It's ridiculous for night to be as bright as day because a few people are cowards. Light helps criminals. Only sudden light-like motion detection trips-deter them.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    2. Re:He's in a great spot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tucson has strict outdoor lighting ordinances.

      I don't know about the lighting ordinances, but I do remember the sky there.

      Very dark sky. And that was on the main drag. Much darker than some parts of rural north georgia I've been in.

    3. Re:He's in a great spot by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Tucson has strict outdoor lighting ordinances. Lights have to face downward, certain types of lights are prohibited, etc.

      What a super idea. Why we do this all over the United States? It would be nice to get some of our night sky back.

    4. Re:He's in a great spot by ghamerly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Check out the international dark-sky association if you're really interested in doing something about this.

    5. Re:He's in a great spot by robobor · · Score: 1

      In fact, during a tour I took of Kitt Peak the tour guide said they get more light pollution from Phoenix than from Tucson, even though it is more than twice as far away.

    6. Re:He's in a great spot by drudd · · Score: 2

      Very true... At the University of Arizona (in Tucson, the primary institution involved with Kitt Peak) they have a fish-eye-lens picture of the night sky from Kitt Peak. There are two very distinct blobs of light on the horizon, corresponding to Tucson and Phoenix.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    7. Re:He's in a great spot by sjames · · Score: 2

      That's a very useful and valid observation.

      A good way to reduce energy costs, and cut light pollution would be to put streetlights on more or less randomized cycles so that they are only on for 1/8 or less of the time at night. Most of the time, they waste no energy and contribute nothing to light pollution. They still deter crime since they could come on at any time without much warning. Experimentation could determine the most optimal average duty cycle. Motion detectors could further refine the system so that the light never comes on uselessly.

      We are told time and again that lights should be turned off when nobody's in a room while miles of empty roads and sidewalks are uselessly lit all night long.

      Years ago, the sky was dark and full of stars where I live. Now, it rarely goes much darker than late twilight.

      At the same time, car headlights could easily be designed to be more effective and less light polluting by narrowing the low beam. driver at night should be looking forward and not upwards or at the roadside anyway.

  21. Re:decisions, decisions by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

    $50 for a telescope, or $50 for a venerial disease...hm...

  22. What if it's Slashdotted? by stevejsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haha, I feel so sorry for the sucker who rented the time slot while this article is on Slashdot's front page. Do you get a refund if the site gets Slashdotted while it's your turn?

  23. Can I get pictures of the "moon landing" sites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet I can't, probably some lame excuse like "the telescope can't point at that spot in the sky" or something.

    1. Re:Can I get pictures of the "moon landing" sites? by jridley · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or possibly some lame excuse like the laws of physics. Look up Dawe's limit sometime. Oh heck, I'll do it for you...

      The Dawes Limit gives the maximum amount of detail that can possibly be seen with a particular aperture (size) of telescope.

      If you want to to calculate Dawes Limit for yourself you can use this simple formula: R' = 4.56/D. In this formula, D is the diameter of the main lens (aperture) measured in inches and R' is the Dawes limit given in arc-seconds.


      Let's see... I'm guessing the lander is maybe 5m across. The moon is 384,400,000 meters away. That gives an angular size of 0.003 arc seconds. So in order to resolve it we need a diameter of 4.56/0.003=1520 inches = 126 feet. Currently our biggest telescope is 10 meters.

      If you happen to find and get time on a 126 foot diameter scope, and your time is on a perfect night on the top of a mountain with no moisture and totally steady skies, you'll be able to resolve the lander as one single pixel. If you want to be able to image it as something recognizable you'd better look for a 500 foot diameter mirror.

      And if we did manage to image it and convince the goofs that it wasn't a fake image, they'd say "OK, fine, you got a craft there but we don't believe it was really manned."

      This is why people ignore the conspiracy theorists. It's like banging your head against the wall; unless you invent a time machine and put them on the rocket in 1969 they won't believe it.

      If anyone does put them on the rocket, I suggest putting them on the outside.

    2. Re:Can I get pictures of the "moon landing" sites? by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Optical interferometry is about to hit the big time. This kind of resolution won't be too difficult to attain.

      There might be other difficulties though with it... possibly the reflecting light of the moon in general swamping what little shading might come off a lander. Interferometry will give you the arc resolution you need, but not necessarily the luminous.

      --

      -

  24. Look an awful lot like Hubble's version by jmichaelg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The images you reference sure look an awful like this one taken by the Hubble. You too can flip one of them 180 degrees and put your name on it if you like.

    1. Re:Look an awful lot like Hubble's version by leighklotz · · Score: 1

      Yes -- I think those Saturn shots are actually labeled Hubble pictures if you follow the link from inside the his site.

  25. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The telescope controls you.

  26. You can rent scopes here to by russ_allegro · · Score: 1

    http://www.tenagraobservatories.com/

    You can pay to use serveral this scopes here as well . It looks like the scopes here are better!

  27. Super astro imaging system by hubble29 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually $50/hr. is a pretty good deal. The three scopes, their mounts, and the ccd camera systems are worth about $75,000 -$100,000 total. Combine that with his location which has excellent seeing in excess of 80% of the time and you have a prime system for some real serious deep sky work. Most people don't realize how difficult astrophotography is. During the exposure which can last anywhere bewteen seconds and hours depending on the magnitude (brightness) of the object being imaged, the scope must track the object without any vibration or error as the earth rotates (less than .000005in. at the mount). In addition to this, these scopes must have perfect goto systems, any error and the user will have a zero chance of being able find where the scope is pointing too. The ccd cameras on these scopes are top self stuff, depending on exactly which cameras he has, they cost anywhere between $5,000 and $25,000. The peltier cooling systems on the ccd cameras would make most over clockers droole. The ccd chip temperature must be maintained +- .5C or better and at 0C or below to maintain image and data accuraccy plus the temperature must be ramped down and back up at a rate which will not destroy the ccd chip. Also since these are robotic ccd camera scopes, they must be focused by software control. Put the whole system together and you have some very serious computer hardware and software. By the way, this guy has a roll off observatory building, that's why the scopes appear to be in the open. You still have plenty of time to enjoy Saturns rings for at least another year; meteor showers are viewed best with the naked eye, a scope has too narrow of a view to catch them; and no you can't or even Hubble see the flag on the moon. It would take something bigger than the Twin Kecks in orbit.m This stuff is actually computer geek heaven!

  28. coolness by 1fitz2many · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is probably noteworthy because of the coolness factor. A good site and well-cooled imaging arrays are not so easy to come by at an amateur level, so if you don't want to invest heavily in hardware, you can try a few things to see if they suit your taste. I would imagine that most buyers aim at targets for "pretty pictures," instead of for some home-brewed science project.

    From a strictly scientific perspective, it's probably not cost-effective to run a research project from a site like this. First of all, most astromonomical research requires some amount of spectroscopy. Of course, looking at a spectrum isn't as visually stunning (to some of us) as an awesome Hubble photo.

    But, we must keep in mind that important science can be done from the ground. Ever found a supernova, asteroid, or comet? There are several unmanned, robotic telescopes around the world that are constantly searching the skies for just these types of object. This is the sort of thing that a hacker with a few bucks to spare (for equipment) could get into.

  29. $50? by Viceice · · Score: 1

    The only way i'll pay that sort of money is if that telescope was mounted on a Satellite and pointed at earth.

    Can you just imagine the coolness of a hi rez orbiting telescope you could control over the net?

    *Whips out PDA*

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  30. Tucson is the place.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like Tucson has a couple things going for it in the way of astronomy.

    EOS Technologies Inc.
    http://www.eostech.com

    Kitt Peak Observatory
    http://www.noao.edu/kpno

    Arizona Optics Industry Association (AOIA)
    http://www.aoia.org/AOIA/

    Arizona Sky Village.
    http://arizonaskyvillage.com/
    anyone interested in retirement?

    Vega-Bray Bed and Breakfast
    http://www.communiverse.com/skywatcher/

  31. Optical interferometry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you get better magnification/accuracy/quality by combining multiple sites around the US (or the world) and taking pictures, then do some computer magic?
    I want pictures of the Moon with the same resolution as Terraserver!

  32. Re:tiem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which retard modded the parent down ? Offtopic, yes, but what a waste of mod points...