Slashdot Mirror


Thermally Powered Mechanical Wristwatch

Raghu Mani writes "Theremally powered quartz wristwatches - which use minor temperature variations to generate electricity - have been around for a few years. Now here is something a lot more radical - a thermally powered mechanical watch. Invented by an American - Steven Phillips - it uses small temperature variations to wind the mainspring of the watch. A patent has been awarded for this - check out this link. A small article on the technology can be found here and the guy's own website is budapestwatchco.com. I doubt if any of us will be buying one of those watches anytime soon, though - just check out those prices ;-)."

43 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Heh by B3ryllium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pfft! You're supposed to tell us about this BEFORE christmas!

  2. A good patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clever stuff like this DESERVES patents, not one click shopping and silly little algorythms.

    Luckily I live in a country with a sane patent system!

    1. Re:A good patent by Rubbersoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So do you think that we could save the patent system by maybe having things review by a committee made up of people in the related field? I am just curious as to how people think we could rework a broke (In my opinion system) to make it respectable again.

      --
      man .sig
      No manual entry for .sig.
    2. Re:A good patent by Hal-9001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The mechanism behind a thermal self-winding mechanical watch and a thermally-powered electrical watch are probably quite different. From skimming the patent, it seems that the thermal self-winding mechanical movement uses the thermal winding of a bimetallic spring to wind the mechanical movement of this watch (sort of like how a bimetallic spring is used to regulate a mercury switch in many thermostats). A thermally-powered electrical watch probably uses the voltage generated across a bimetallic junction to drive the quartz oscillator (which is more akin to a Peltier cooler run in reverse). I agree that, while the idea is clever, it does not deserve patent protection for the next twenty years. On the other hand, the market for this type of invention is pretty small, and other watch makers are free to continue manufacturing other types of self-powered movements (self-winding, kinetic generators, thermoelectric, etc.), so granting the patent does not especially harm the market.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  3. $109,000.00 by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny
    Wow...

    I'm reeling from the thought that a watch can be worth more than my whole house.

    Better not forget it in your pants come laundry day...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:$109,000.00 by Petrol · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think he arrived at the base price by adding decimal places to his patent number.

      --
      ...and that's the end of our show. Donk!
    2. Re:$109,000.00 by radon28 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better not forget it in your pants come laundry day...

      I don't know about you, but I usually wear my watch on my wrist :p

    3. Re:$109,000.00 by frovingslosh · · Score: 2
      I'm reeling from the thought that a watch can be worth more than my whole house.

      It may cost more than your whole house, that doesn't make it worth more.

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. Impressive.....but a collector's item by slashuzer · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This is a collector's item, more than anything else. Just look at the claims in the patent, to give you some idea of the complexity!!

    This is a cool gadget. And for those wondering about body temperature.....

    The back of a watch embodying the invention is selected to be of a good heat conductive material, which will influence the temperature at the coil. Tests utilizing a thermometer strapped to a wrist, as a watch is, have shown the following temperature variations. When the watch is on the arm for the day, it is subjected to high temperatures due to body heat (on the order of ninety-five degrees). Most watches are worn slightly loose. When the back of the watch is essentially flush on the arm the temperature is up, on the order of ninety degrees F. Due to a slight shift on the arm, the case acts as a heat sink and the temperature drops three to six degrees F. This occurs about every fifteen minutes at room temperatures of seventy-five to seventy eight degrees. In addition there are fluctuations in room temperature due to cycling of the heating or air conditioning thermostats. The changes in temperature at the watch are more frequent and at a wider range when the watch is worn outside. It was found that the temperature at the watch was ninety degrees plus five degrees and minus ten degrees on a day when the outside ambient temperature was fifty degrees, all temperatures being Fahrenheit. When the watch is removed at night and subjected only to ambient room temperature it will very quickly drop to ambient room temperature, usually about seventy degrees. During the night the temperature will cycle with fluctuation in room temperature as the thermostatically controlled heat cycles. When the wearer again puts on the watch in the morning, there will be an increase in temperature of the watch casing back up to the external body temperature of the wearer. Change in temperature in either direction will produce self-winding of a watch embodying the invention.

    Truly a perpetual watch!

  5. Prices aren't so out of line by shoppa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The prices asked (a few $10000) aren't too far out of line for what is essentially a custom-built watch. I don't think that the self-winding technology is setting the price, just the low production quantities.

    For comparison, the Pulsar, the first digital watch the on the market, cost $2100. A couple years later digital watches were under $20 from Texas Instruments, and just a couple of years after that TI was out of the watch business because they couldn't compete against $4 imports.

    This isn't saying that self-winding watches will take off in the same way; it's just comparing the prices of mass-production stuff versus very low rate production.

    1. Re:Prices aren't so out of line by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      I don't think that the self-winding technology is setting the price, just the low production quantities.

      New technology, limited quantity, hand made by the inventor. Case is 18 karat gold.

      There are lots of things affecting the price here.

  6. Re:"real patents" vs epatents by Goldenpi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, patents are important. But I think the system needs some changes. At the moment patents are very easy to get. In austraila someone managed to patent the wheel a few years back. They patented it as the "circular transportation facilitation device". In the US an anti-patent person noticed their child using a swing sideways and applied for a patent on sideways swinging. They got it. The ausie patent was done on a fast-track application, but the US swing was a normal patent subject to the same scrutiny as any other (ie zero). Other famous patents are IBMs famous patent for a computerised airplane toilet queueing system and Microsofts patent on the ASF format, which they used to bully Virtualdub because it could transcode ASF.

  7. Spell Checker. by dsb3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    At those prices, you'd think he could afford a spell checker. I've been reading the site for 5 minutes and already found 3 errors.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  8. Re:i am not good in English... by Goldenpi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Loophole spoted. This only covers energy sources which are subject to angular deflection. Use something like a smaller version of the temperature-compensated pendulum and you get liner deflection not covered by the patent. You can convert that o angular using a rack-and-gear if you need angular to drive the mechanism.

  9. Umm why so much? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I can see they are of great quality, ( all the best timepieces ARE mechanical ) and are worth quite a bit ..

    But 100k??? That is a bit steep, even for this ....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  10. better solution by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buy a 9$ watch, spend 20000$ on batteries, save yourself 9991$ compared to the prices of their watches.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:better solution by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      What surprises me is that in this day and age we still have battery powered calculators at all. Wouldn't a decently sized solar panel [e.g. make it 2cm x 1cm and that should be enough].

      That'd work fine for a 4-function calculator (or an entry-level scientific calculator), but I'd think the solar panel you would need to power (for instance) a TI-92+ or an HP 48GX would be a bit on the bulky side.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  11. Patent?! by medscaper · · Score: 2
    A patent has been awarded for this

    Criminy. They'll give patents for ANYthing these days...

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  12. Memory metals?? by t0qer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a link,
    Here's a link,
    why don't I just

    link the google search page?


    Anyone remember memory metals? They were sort of a greeting card fad for a
    while..You would mail a loved one what looked like an unbent paper clip, with
    instructions to dip it into hot coffee. Upon hitting the hot coffee the metal
    would bend itself into a message. Really neat stuff if you ever got to play with
    it.


    1. Re:Memory metals?? by prisoner · · Score: 2

      You know, when I was a kid I remember reading about these in some magazine. The article indicated that NASA was running a contest (sort of). Send in an idea of how to use these things and they'd send you a piece. Didn't matter how dumb the idea was (it *was* a kids magazine). My friend and I sent in ideas, he got his piece of wire and I never got mine. Bastards. Never got his wire to do much anyways...

    2. Re:Memory metals?? by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure this invention doesn't use memory metals. From skimming the patent, the power source for this watch movement seems to be a bimetallic coil spring. The different coefficients of thermal expansion of the metals cause the spring to coil or uncoil when it is heated or cooled. An escapement mechanism is probably used to connect this spring to the mechanical movement, so that regardless of whether the spring is coiling or uncoiling, it winds the watch.

      All in all, I have to say its a pretty clever idea, but I'm surprised no one thought of it before. Bimetallic strips have been used to regulate mercury switches in thermostats for many years, and most mechanical clock and watches need an escapement so that the swinging of the pendulum or the oscillation of the spring only drives the movement forward and not backward.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    3. Re:Memory metals?? by psyconaut · · Score: 2

      I have a couple of spools of ninitinol (sp?) somewhere. A memory metal that contracts or expands when you apply current.

      -psy

  13. Not the first... by dbitter1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My (now departed) grandfather recieved an Omega watch as a retirement present ~1950. It, too, never required winding and sure as hell wasn't $10K (or whatever, adjusted for inflation)

    . I never bothered to open it and play with it, but he said it had something to do with the pendulum action of your arms... Still works like a charm today.

    --
    For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    1. Re:Not the first... by thelexx · · Score: 2

      What fucking dictionary are you using?

      horology (hô-rl-j) n.

      1. The science of measuring time.
      2. The art of making timepieces.

      So this guy made a watch that just runs, forever, without a battery, movement, or purposeful interaction of any kind, a feat never before accomplished by anyone, and it's of 'no horological significance'. You are an ass.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  14. I'll stick with my Dad's by craenor · · Score: 2

    Rolex...17 years old and still sweeping (Rolex's don't tick).

    1. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by Crazy+Diamond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes they do. At 8 times per second that comes to 28800 ticks per hour. All mechanical watches "sweep" with some slower than 28800vph, and some faster.

      If you have a Rolex you should be able to actually see the ticks and if you put it up to your ear, you can hear and actually count the 8 ticks per second.

    2. Re:I'll stick with my Dad's by craenor · · Score: 2

      Actually I realized that, I was more alluding to the distinctive tick of Quartz movement in a play on words from the Timex commercials, takes a licking and keeps on ticking.

      Also made in reference to the fact that the primary means of telling most fake Rolexs from real ones is the Quartz movement that most fake ones have.

  15. screw the watch, give me that power supply! by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    Excellent, now we finally can have mechanical power generated from temperature fluctuations. All we need now is some sort of a machine to convert mechanical power into electrical and we have a new type of energy generator... hmmmm ... but where to get such a machine?!

  16. I you get killed... by PineGreen · · Score: 2

    ... you would automatically help the investigators by telling them when exactly have you died....

  17. The watch isn't the point by Migelikor1 · · Score: 2

    This device is able to use human body heat to create enough usable energy to drive a fairly simple mechanical device.

    Let's extend this, playing futurist a bit. The same technology is applied to all the interior surfaces of your clothes, meaning that all your radiated body heat is put to use. Now, your wearable technologies need either smaller batteries, since they are trickle charged all day long by your body heat. Maybe your clothes have an air conditioner built in driven by body heat, maybe you just power a flat panel PDA on your wrist.

    I'd keep an eye on this type of technology...reclaiming wasted energy could have huge implications for portable technologies of all kinds.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:The watch isn't the point by Scrameustache · · Score: 2

      ...winter clothing that use the much higher heat difference between the side next to the body and the side next to the winter cold while maintaining an usefull insulation...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  18. TimeZone - site for watch geeks by Nelson+Minar · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're into mechanical watches, check out www.timezone.com. It's a website for watch geeks with an active message board.

    The Steven Phillips watches built here look awfully impressive. Too bad about the style, particularly the enamelling. There's a reason perlage is the standard movement decoration.

  19. Do people still wear watches? by FattMattP · · Score: 2

    Do people still wear watches? With all of the devices that surround us every day that give the time and date, I'm surprised that watches are are sold and used any more.

    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  20. Think Geek by dirvish · · Score: 2

    They are just trying to get us fired up about so that when they start selling next month on thinkgeek they will make a load of money.

  21. This is actually fairly significant by HC_Earwicker · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is a much more detailed write-up on this in International Wrist Watch magazine (they have a website but the article is not there). Imagine an automatic wristwatch that does not even have to be wound but stays running all the time!

    What's more, a "side-effect" of this is that the watch has become vastly more accurate. The rate at which mechanical watches run is dependent on the tension in the mainspring - and since that isn't constant (even in regularly worn automatic watches) mechanical watches (even the most accurate ones) tend to lose or gain a few seconds a day.

    The "eternal winding" mechanism somehow manages to keep the tension in the mainspring fairly constant - so the watch's rate varies a lot less and it ends up being about as accurate as a quartz watch!

    The ridiculous price is only because these are a limited edition set of watches made by the inventor. According to the article, he intends to sell his patent to a bug watch manufacturer. If Rolex or Omega, for instance, gets hold of it, they will probably incorporate these in their regular watches and the price will, in time, come down to the same as regular Rolex/Omega prices (which aren't exactly cheap but not this expensive either).

    - HCE

    1. Re:This is actually fairly significant by mtec · · Score: 2

      he intends to sell his patent to a bug watch manufacturer.

      I'm picturing a cockroach with a tiny little Rolex...

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  22. Wow! by mtec · · Score: 2


    That is so cool! Uh, wait!
    No, no it's so hot, uh, cool...wait!

    *ducks*

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  23. Re:This is NOT new. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

    Yep, you're right. I was just about to make a similar post myself.

    The temperature differential thing is new and neat, but other types of self-winding mechanical watches have been around for more than fifty years.

    I have a handsome "Clipper Automatic" watch that my father used to wear all the time. Like most self-winding watches it's kept wound by movement of the arm and wrist. The mechanism still works even after years of sitting forgotten in a drawer.

  24. The watch is beside the point... by mtec · · Score: 2


    It's the innovative power supply and it's potential uses, silly.

    Why, this is close to a perpetual motion machine (and temperature variations abound)....

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  25. Well said... by mtec · · Score: 2

    I can't believe how many here don't understand the significance..

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  26. I'll stick with my Seiko Kinetic, thanks by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Basically it derives energy from the temperature change when the watch is on top of your arm (flush against the skin == hotter) and when it's flopped to the side (exposed to air == cooler). In other words, it still needs motion to operate, albeit indirectly.

    Hence, my trusty kinetic watch is effectively equivalent but a lot more affordable.

  27. Re:not perpetual by human+bean · · Score: 2

    If you stopped eating for long enough, I bet that the watch would stop also...

    --

    *whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"

  28. Re:A good patent - NOT by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    I have seen temperture winding clocks from back in the 1960 - 1970 time frame. This has prior art.

    Clocks, perhaps...but watches? Given the difficulties often encountered when trying to scale mechanical systems down to smaller sizes, I doubt that claiming a thermally-powered clock as prior art WRT a patent on a thermally-powered watch would fly.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.