Slashdot Mirror


How To Stop Piracy: Raid CD-R Moguls

An anonymous reader writes "In what appears to be a not-so-legal move, Mexico's equivalent of the RIAA used federal police to raid the installations of Grupo Mekong, responsible for 200 of the 400 million virgin CDs imported each year, accusing them to be "capos" of the Piracy bussiness in Mexico. What is the rationale? Record companies buy only 20% of Mekong merchandise, so the other 80% must be going to pirates! Yeah, Never mind computer users ,independent labels or other legal uses. You can see the article here but what amazes me is the behaviour! What will the next step be? Raid the truck companies who deliver the CDs? "

42 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Let's take on Atmel! by shepd · · Score: 5, Funny

    A large percentage of their inventory is used for satellite piracy! Com'mon RIAA, can't you help out the poor satellite companies!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  2. English via google by MikeFM · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:English via google by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 5, Funny
      You thank often for informative very translation! Points of article veritably stated I address must:
      According to calculations of the Protective Derechos Association Intelectuales Fonogra'ficos (APDIF), the legal industry purchase per year 20 million discs, as soon as the 10 percent of 200 million that the Soli's matter and sell annually. For that reason they are indicated like the main suppliers of piracy in Mexico.
      Generalization infamous this argument specious is. Uses of numerous multiplicity disks can be made to have by consumer. To Piracy assume on simple stupidhead calcuations offhand make, demostrates syllogistically the logic that smells foul.
      Between the supposed denounced irregularities, Ildefonso Soli's indicated that in the operative one of the 18 of December, between the 7 million assured discs were 2,8 million units that were seized for the second time, which already had been given back them by Property because the merchandise were legal.
      Here weighings awesome of judegmental facts against poor law enforcement lean. Own actions police of past show virgin discs to of unassailable purity innocence uses comprised having been. Whole issue of suspicion frequently corruption singing quietly from under floorboards it cannot be dodged.
  3. I'd like to see ... by Buran · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to see 'em raid the trucks The Fast and the Furious-style. Imagine Hilary Rosen driving one of those Civics and cursing in Spanish at the truck driver. Imagine Jack Valenti hanging from the side of the truck getting his arm cut off while his lobbyist pals in some more black Civics try to save him.

    Or...

    "I'd like to live, just long enough, to see them put your head on a pike as a reminder to the next ten generations that some boy band music comes at too high a price. I'd like to look up into your lifeless eyes, and wave, like this..."

  4. Even an idiot could see... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That the tyre manufacturers have to be stopped.

    They are giving the truck manufacturers all the ammunition they need to make trucks.

    Trucks give these so-called truck companies the very tools needed to have a truck company, which provides a perfect cocktail for the CD-R retailers to get their greedy, dishonest hands on the product.

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
  5. CD's not CDR's? by suss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, Never mind computer users ,independent labels or other legal uses.

    It looks more like these are CD's that have to be pressed, not CDR's useable by computer users.

    Don't these CD's have to be pressed in a factory?

    Anyway, it's inexcuseable, but probably something the RIAA would do too if they could get away with it.

    1. Re:CD's not CDR's? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't these CD's have to be pressed in a factory?

      Yes, but I'm sure RIAA skillfully ignored all those COMPUTER SOFTWARE DISCS that have to be pressed.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:CD's not CDR's? by lpontiac · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yes, but I'm sure RIAA skillfully ignored all those COMPUTER SOFTWARE DISCS that have to be pressed.

      And AOL probably presses more discs than every record label in the world combined..

    3. Re:CD's not CDR's? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 5, Funny

      And AOL probably presses more discs than every record label in the world combined..

      I suddenly find myself ambivalent about this whole affair.

  6. Re:Link is in Spanish by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    for those slashdotters who actually read the articles

    So YOU'RE the one!

    What, you expect special treatment? ;-)

  7. You call that translation? by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Funny

    They say to not know that they make other industries with the virgin discs that sell to them

    Notice the dateline is "City of Mexico." I imagine President Bush lives in the "House of White."

    How long before we have an international incident because someone relied on these freebie translators? Imagine the U.S. using google to save time going through all those docs from Saddam Hussein ("My God! He's stockpiled 36,000 sticks of weaponized rancid butter!").

    *

    I searched for "Mekong Group" (kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting there: "The Mekong group comprises Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and China's Yunnan province, all of which border the Mekong River.") No luck.

    However, from reading the article in Spanish (and I don't speak Spanish) I get the impression that the actual allegation is that the Group knowingly sold millions of discs "off the books" and can't account for them in their invoicing. If true, the action doesn't sound so unreasonable, as it suggests they knew they were doing something fishy. "Suggests" -- who knows? But this doesn't sound like a suspicionless search, and not at all Orwellian.

    1. Re:You call that translation? by ninewands · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Quoth the poster:
      I searched for "Mekong Group" (kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting there: "The Mekong group comprises Cambodia, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand, Myanmar and China's Yunnan province, all of which border the Mekong River.") No luck.

      Nice to know your Google grepping skills are so well developed. The company, being Mexican, has a Spanish name. They are "Grupo Mekong, not "Mekong Group." Also, being a Mexican company, they are not terribly troubled by things that are "kind of a disturbing name to Americans in light of Vietnam fighting ...".

      Let's see ... from their "Productos" page, it appears that they sell to Gauss CD, SONY, TDK, Verbatim ... sounds like burnable CD-Rs that are usable for both audio mastering and data to me ... I don't know if Mexican law provides for lawsuits on the basis of "malicious prosecution" or "abuse of legal process" like Anglo-American law does, but it would certainly be interesting to see what evidence APDIF would present to justify this raid.
    2. Re:You call that translation? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it's still shooting the messenger. And there's some question in my mind as to whether a seller even has a *right* to know what his products are used for. Not to mention that the whole thing is a rather well-greased slope. If I buy a truckload of fertilizer and a tank of diesel, do I plan to make a bomb or run my tractor and fertilize my fields? Should I be judged "likely of guilt" in advance??

      In fact -- looks like we ought to add a new verdict: no longer will someone be merely "guilty" or "innocent". The new option, in the name of crime prevention at any cost, will be "preemptively guilty".

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  8. I can't type that fast but... by pavera · · Score: 5, Informative

    I speak and read spanish rather fluently,
    these were CD-R's
    The government agency APDIF (the association protecting the intellectual property of musical recordings) raided this company,
    the company says its illegal because they aren't doing anything wrong, the APDIF is using statistics similar to those used by the RIAA to substanciate their claims that Mekong is aiding the piracy industry ( leaving out all legal uses of CD-R's including data, and other legal uses), Mekong suspects that the APDIF has bribed government officials, or is in some other way in bed with them, and they are specifically attacking Mekong, the article states that there are at least 50 other CD-R importers none of which have been hassled at all, while Mekong has been interferred with 10 times in the last year.

    1. Re:I can't type that fast but... by pavera · · Score: 4, Informative

      correction, the agency PGR raided the company,
      apparently at the behest of APDIF
      sorry for that.

    2. Re:I can't type that fast but... by Surak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ( leaving out all legal uses of CD-R's including data, and other legal uses)

      I don't know what the laws in Mexico are, but generally speaking if they are anything like the U.S. (and that's likely because I *think* they have signed onto the Berne Convention), then there are far more legal uses for CD-Rs than data, including burning copyrighted music to them.

      Remember that fair use allows me to take my legally purchased copyrighted music CDs, rip them to MP3 files, and then burn them to a "mix" CD. There's nothing illegal about that. Note that fair use does NOT allow me to take those same MP3s and share them with the world via a P2P network, however. (Not that that's stopping anyone. ;)

  9. This is only the beginning by Rolman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm Mexican and while I really feel embarrased this kind of idiocy happens in my country, looking closer it happened because the authorities and legal system are extremely broken and stupid when it comes to understanding the nature of the crime that is being pursued in regards to piracy, and the record companies can abuse the situation.

    Funny, but I think this is the same case in almost ANY country. So, while it happened in Mexico because the system could be abused pretty easily, watch out for the same thing happening in other countries soon enough.

    Before this happened, I had even seen commercials stating in a pretty explicit way some phrases equivalent to: "Piracy is theft". This shows it's not only a fault in our system, but because the record companies have the money and power to push their lame propaganda, laws and the perception of the crime can be shaped fairly easily by pulling the right strings.

    As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to theft, but to copyright infringement. This definition is blurred specifically by the record companies in Mexico so to be able to prompt the Police to take care of things as they command.

    You see, there is a really strong music industry in Mexico, where we have literally hundreds of "artists" that sell their overrated, overpriced crap all over the continent, and predictably, this industry is controlled by the same RIAA companies we love to hate.

    In fact, these events should come as no surprise, because in countries like mine, most people can't afford to pay the equivalent to US$15 for a single disk, priced as if it were an imported item, when it could be cheaper because the price markups don't need to be as high as in other countries, where everything from labor to land costs are more expensive. People DO buy and distribute bootlegs, there ARE criminals around here, but this is not the way to handle the situation. This is just a test of RIAA's power.

    Companies that want to protect their profit margins and revenue sources at the expense of the user... Where do you see this happening next?

    Mark my words, this is going to happen in another country and at a much bigger scale, sooner or later.

    Now, who are the real "capos"?

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
    1. Re:This is only the beginning by PjotrP · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In some way it's already happening for a couple of years in Holland too. In principle at least because while we do not have raids on the cd-r companies like in mexico the dutch equivalent of the RIAA has made it so that they get a certain percentage of every sold cd-r.

      How is the same in principle? Well the thought behind it is very similar. In both cases the record industry just assumes to know what those empty cd-r's will get used for. The only difference is the choice of action taken in light of that assumption.

      When you think about it the thing happening in Mexico is the more logical one. Because when the first assumption is made the more logical step is to follow up that assumption with legal measures. At least the mexican stand on cd-r's is consistent in the sense that once they view it as an illegal activity they take legal actions... The dutch RIAA on the other hand chose to demand percentages of the profits made on the cd-r's. So people who just buy a 10 pack cd-r's to backup data are also paying the record companies through those percentages. This choice may at first seem logical as well (again once the first assumption is accepted) were it not for the fact that it is inconsistant with the record companies constant fight on piracy. So on the one hand they charge people for burning cd's because there are probably copyrighted mp3's involved but on the other hand they are working to make sure that no copyrighted material even exists unless pressed on their own releases. Its like on the one hand banning guns while on the other hand demanding a percentage for every gun sold.

      So at least in Mexico a wrong assumption leads to an action that can be justified by that assumption while in holland a wrong assumption leads another action which in itself cant be justified by the wrong assumption.

      Ah well, this whole problem will be solved with the new copyprotected discs, wont it? hehe

      --
      PjotrP
    2. Re:This is only the beginning by Roofus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Excuse me sir, but this is Slashdot. I'm going to need you to take your rational viewpoint somewhere else.

    3. Re:This is only the beginning by deblau · · Score: 5, Insightful
      As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to theft, but to copyright infringement.

      As every educated /.ter should know, piracy IS a crime, only it's not related to copyright infringement, but to crime on the high seas. Real piracy carries a life sentence.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  10. is it possible by alizard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I don't know the legal system in Mexico, other than that it has a reputation for corruption (rather like the US Congress) or the respective organization. I'm interested in comments from people who actually know the situation down there.

    Is it possible for the company who had its CDRs ripped off to sue the Mexican equivalent of RIAA into oblivion, i.e. to ... outbid the recording industry for justice?

  11. Are we hearning the whole story? by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know in Canada, for example, that all CD-Rs are taxed, and part of the money goes to the recording companies. If a Canadian importer was only sending 20% of the CDs that they imported to stores that collected the tax, they would probably be doing something illegal there, so perhaps there is a similar situation in Mexico... i.e. only 20% of the CD-Rs that are sold have the record-tax collected with the sale. If that was the case, then there would certainly be a legal reason to go after these people, if not a moral one.

    (btw, It probably goes without saying, but I think these kinds of laws are ridiculous. In the US taxes are collected on blank tapes, and special CD-Rs that special music-only CD burners can record onto)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's worth noting that to date, the CPCC (Candian Private Copying Collective) has collected over 20 MILLION dollars due to the levy on CD-R media.

      Not a single PENNY has gone to anyone except the CPCC. They havn't given any of it to anyone.

      And since the levy is implemented by the government, you'd expect that we (the public) could have a look at the books... Wrong, the CPCC is more or less a private company, so they don't have to show the public what they're doing behind the scenes.

      What a scam.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:Are we hearning the whole story? by gr66nman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out the CPCC site. They clearly indicate on their site that they will be distributing royalties in 2003 and that they have $28 million ready for distribution. The Copyright Board of Canada also states how the money should be distributed.

  12. APDIF? by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that like S/PDIF?

    Sorry, that was a really lame joke.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  13. What about the trees? by aiken_d · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, come on, do you realize that fully 20% of the oxygen that trees produce goes to criminals, bums, drug dealers, and pirates? Coincidence? I think not! The trees must be jailed!

    -b

    --
    If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    1. Re:What about the trees? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Funny
      To add insult to injury the tree next to our house tried to drop a huge branch on us the other day.

      Never piss off the trees. Saruman learned that the hard way.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  14. just robber baron tactics by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How large has the CD industry become over the past few years? I'd guess it's already larger than the music industry. Just take a look at your local electronics store - I know several that have more shelf space devoted to CD readers, writers, blanks and other equipment than to music CDs.

    So in essence, this is just one industry association trying to do as much damage on another industry as they can. Because they know that sooner or later, it'll all come down to "what is better for the economy" or "who has the larger bottom line".

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  15. You call that funny? by CBNobi · · Score: 4, Informative

    BabelFish, and other systems based off of the SysTran system use a literal translation algorithm, also called Word-for-Word translation. Thus, it doesn't search for phrases or sentence structure; it's not uncommon to see "su" (the Spanish equivalent of his/her/its) simply translated as "his". And as Spanish would have it, "Ciudad de Mexico" literally translates to "City of Mexico". ("White House" is "Casa Blanca", by the way)

    As for the Mekong group, with a quick search you'd find their website. Note that it's "Grupo Mekong".

    News flash: Not everything is based off of English. Nor does everything get passed on to American sites.

  16. just cops after bribes, its Mexico by DABANSHEE · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whether one is committing a crime or not, (one can even be 100% legit) cops in much of the world will not hesitate to hassle one if they think they can get 'don't hassle me' bribe money.

    This is Mexico it happens all the time. Gez I know someone who was arrested & locked up for reporting the theft of her handbag, she paid a bribe & she was out of there. Only thing was she didn't know how things worked in the 3rd World because it took 2 days of her being locked up before she put 2 & 2 together (just because a cop wants a bribe doesn't mean they'l spell things out for you)

    1. Re:just cops after bribes, its Mexico by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      My sister's company does business in Spain (in fact a niece to the king of Spain was my sister's office assistant for a while, having been sent out to "learn about the world"). Before anyone from my sister's office was allowed to talk to Spanish officials, their Spanish liaison gave them a crash course in the art of bribery: Even tho offering or accepting a bribe is highly illegal and WILL get you jailed on the spot, bribes are nonetheless expected (indeed, *required*) if you intend to actually get any work done. But no one will up and tell you "now is the time to offer a bribe." The trick is noticing the point in the negotiations where the bribe IS expected, and responding appropriately and generously -- while making damn sure everyone can regard the bribe as a "gift", thus legal.

      The fact is, every system ultimately runs on grease, whether that's preferential business deals, political favours, or outright bribes.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  17. What a GREAT IDEA for law enforcement!! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a GREAT IDEA for law enforcement!! See, now they don't have to investigate murders any more, just go and arrest the manufacturers of the bullets! Now every murder can be solved in seconds! Piracy? Arrest the people who run the electric company! After all, they provide the power that runs the computers those pirates use! Or, even better, go and arrest the managers of the FOOD STORES. After all, if they didn't sell food to pirates and criminals, they'd starve to death! OH..and arresting the food managers will have an unexpected bonus...we'll starve terrorists to death at the same time! Does this sound ridiculous? Seems to me that it's exactly what's going on! See, many things can be used for both legal and illegal purposes. Banning them JUST BECAUSE the potential of illegal use exists is purley asanine, yet it's already happening now.....

  18. Have a translation by cookd · · Score: 5, Informative

    (Let's hear it for the karma whores! WHOOP WHOOP WHOOP!)

    Ok, another translation by a person who kinda knows Spanish (I do fine in conversation) but I am bound to get a few things wrong where you need to know the culture. Those who know better -- please feel free to correct me. When I'm uncertain, I put the actual literally-translated Spanish word in parentheses after my guess at the best-fit (actual meaning) English word. Here goes nothing:

    UEDO (Special Unit against Organized Crime) detains (roots?) head(?) pirates
    They (the pirates?) say they don't know/don't care about the way that their blank disks are used.

    The UEDO spent 90 days detaining (rooting?) Efrain and Rafael Solis Heredia, owners of the Mekong Group and considered by the music indistry the "heads" of record piracy, since they alone bring into Mexico about 200 of the 400 million blank disks that are imported each year.

    Idelfonso, Solis Heredia, brother of those detained (rooted?), acting as proxy, announced yesterday that the next week he will denounce PGR and the Secretariat... for the "illegal" nature of a December 18th operation where the Solis brothers were detained and 7 million CDR disks were confiscated (secured?).

    "This operation turned into a search, but they had no warrant, with these situations as our basis, we are performing a legal analysis to figure out what kind of charges (demands?) will be brought, in the next week we'll have it." (run-on sentence present in original Spanish, making it hard for me to figure out what he was really trying to say...)

    "They (the PGR?) were requested to release them (the Solis brothers), but the PGR detained (rooted?) them so that they could start their investigations, from that comes our concern because in the style of earlier administrations (Governments?) they are trying to make up some nonexistent crime or plant something to make us guilty of something that was never found," said the lawyer.

    The Solis brothers are (SIC-were?) detained during the previous investigation PGR/UEDO/397/02, since its business, which has branches in 4 parts of the country, sells blank disks to the legal record industry as well as to pirates.

    According to the calculations of the APDIF (Association for the Protection of Recording/Music IP), the legitamate industry (i.e. the record industry) purchases 20 million disks per year, but that is only 10% of the 200 million that the Solis family imports and sells each year. For this reason, they are flagged as the principle instigators of piracy in Mexico.

    Among the accusations he refuted (among the supposed irregularities denounced?), Ildefonso Solis noted that in the December 18th operation, among the 7 million disks confiscated were 2.8 million units that were taken for a second time, since they had already been returned since the merchandise was legal.

    "60% of these disks were produced in Mexico, 20% were disks that had been seized the previous time, and 20% are disks for which we have the necessary invoices and papers, so we can't see any reason why they make these illegal seizures," he said.

    In fact, Mekong's proxy (Idelfonso) presented copies of documents from the Tax Administration Service, in which is recorded the return of 2,852,523 blank CDR disks and 3 CPUs on August 27.

    Solis said that it is not their problem that some of their customers are producers of unauthorized music, and accused the AMPROFON (Mexican Association of Producers of Records and Videos) and the APDIF (Association for the Protection of Record IP) of being behind the "defamations" and operations of the PGR.

    "They claim that these disks can be used for illegal activities, which is something that doesn't really concern us -- we know what we are doing, but we don't know what other industries are doing."

    "We know that behind them (PGR) is the AMPROFON componay, that they (AMPROFON) have turned (taken? I'm guessing the m should really be an rn, in which case "turned" is correct) them against us, as well as APDIF, because they feel it is illegal (they feel illegal?), but we only sell original blank materal, and we sell it to the industry, we don't understand the rationale behind these accusations and defamations against us," he claimed.

    In addition, he asked the PGR for "talk, not repression," since he complained that the federal authorities have only acted against ("grabbed at it") the Mekong company and not against a single one of the 50 other companies -- including international companies -- that are involved with importing and selling CDR disks.

    Between December 19th 2001 and December 18th 2002, there have been 10 operations and 10 visits to 10 branches and warehouses of this company that supposedly supplies half of the pirates in Mexico.

    "We know that we are not the only ones, there are about 50 companies that are involved in importing disks, and among these 50 there are many international ones that have not been bothered and that are involved in the same activities as are we, I won't name names."

    "We want the authorities to talk with us and we want to not have repression, the operations that are being made are totally illegal, we want there to be dialogue, that the authorities explain to us why they are doing these illegal actions," said Solis.

    --
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
  19. Re:A difference by thedigitalbean · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ummm no...

    Read this:

    http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml

    The levy is set to increase on Jan. 2003

    CDRs - 53 cents / disc
    Hard Drives on portable MP3 players - $ 21.00 / GB !!! 21 dollars!

    They are also going to institute levys against removable and non-removable memory cards.

    This is hardly 'a few cents per CD'

  20. Ads with "piracy is theft" by ParnBR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In Brazil, there's something similar to that, but the message is "piracy is a crime". Here, a new CD costs around US$7.50 to US$10.00, but an equivalent pirate CD costs around US$2.85 (at least where I live). These pirate CDs are usually pressed bootlegs, but not always. Considering a single CD costs (in average) 15% of minimum monthly wage in Brazil, I think it's safe to assume CDs are way overpriced here. Sad to see bootleggers AND record companies get rich taking advantage of this situation. And copy-protected CDs are cropping up here too. :(

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
  21. Fair use . . . according to the RIAA? by angle_slam · · Score: 4, Informative
    Remember that fair use allows me to take my legally purchased copyrighted music CDs, rip them to MP3 files, and then burn them to a "mix" CD. There's nothing illegal about that.

    Well, that is your position anyway. If you look at the Audio Home Recording Act ("AHRA"), you'll see that there is an immunity to making some types of recordings. One cannot be prosecuted for making those types of recordings. However, the RIAA's position (as seen here) is that CD-R drives on computers are not covered by the Audio Home Recording Act:

    Multipurpose devices, such as a general computer or a CD-ROM drive, are not covered by the AHRA. This means that they are not required to pay royalties or incorporate SCMS protections. It also means, however, that neither manufacturers of the devices, nor the consumers who use them, receive immunity from suit for copyright infringement.
    All this may mean, however, is that, instead of looking at the Audio Home Recording Act to see if making a personal copy is legal, one would have to look at the traditional Fair Use factors. It is very arguable that the AHRA was originally intended to prevent perfect digital copies of CDs, and an MP3 is not a perfect digital copy. In fact, one may argue that distributing MP3s is a "noncommercial use," as those who place music on Kazaa are not seeking renumeration, so are thus within the spirit (though possibly not within the letter) of the AHRA.
  22. Oh for the love of rice... by Yokoshima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been a long time reader of /. and even sometimes dabble in to see the replies of people, being a Mexican my attention was caught by this article, and more so by the replies. I'll try and give some more insight and correct some things. 1)We can't say "It happened in Mexico" because there are three different places called Mexico, one is the country, another is the state and a third one is the city, so Ciudad de Mexico is quite right. 2)Raided makes me think of swat teams jumping in from windows totting guns and helicopters flying overhead etc...(yes its your dammed media that makes me think this) an "arraigo" is actually just house arrest you...arraigo dosnt translate to raid TYVM. 3)A "Orden de cateo" is pretty much a search warrant which the officials didn't have while they searched through Grupo Mekong's stuff. It wasn't just the PGR that was in on this FYI also. 4)Mekong is under this supposedly because most of what they sell they sell to people that use this CDRs to burn copies of original stuff and sell them, so this compares as if in the U.S. Wal-Mart is investigated for selling the guns that the deppressed teen used to blast the heads off his classmates (what can I say I'm still fascinated by that stuff). 5)Mekong can account for every last piece of their merchandise with the required paperwork, the Officials cant account even for a search warrant. 6)Mekong believes the AMPROFON and APDIF (yes pretty much the mexican RIAA) is behind this, the same way it is in other countries. 7)Yes alot of mexican cops are looking for a bribe, they have a shitty salary and they dont ask for much 20-50 pesos (2 to 5 dollars) and theyll leave ya be, but it ain't everywhere and lets not compare Mexico's Police Force with the U.S. we ain't the racists ones, so there. 8)We're not a third world country you .... were a developing 2nd world country. 9)I know I had more but I just forgot. Puh-lease don't make like Mexico is a shitty country, every country is shitty and we can debate upon that any freakin day of the week, and twice on sunday.

  23. CDs in the 50's? (Plus Royalty contract example) by droopus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. that back in the days (50s and 60s), when a lot of pressing plants used the Mafia to deter organised labour, there used to be a grey market kick back to the Mafia in the form of pressed CDs that weren't registered on the books of the record companies.

    Um, while James Russell (I think) did actually come up with the concept for what would become the CD in 1965, Sony and Philips didn't popularize the format till 1983. So, no CDs were kicked back in the 50's - 60's.

    Also remember that even today, record contracts include at least a 10% "breakage" or "container: allowance off the worldwide gross prior to calculating how many rolls of pennies the artist will get, after recouping all expenses. What they do with that 10% (since CDs don't break in shipment like the shellac records for which the breakage allowance was instituted) is a mystery. Some labels actually skim 25% off the top. No need for CD kickbacks there.

    Yep, 25%. You want to see just how egregious some record contracts are? The following is clipped from an actual label contract presented to the prospective band last week. All identifying brands and names have been removed:

    ROYALTIES

    Company shall accrue to Artist the following royalties for the sale by Company, its licensees or assigns, or long playing Albums derived from the Master Recordings against which all sums paid to Artist herein shall be recouped.

    (a) With respect to records sold up at Company's or its distributor's "top line" price level in the United States, a royalty at the rate of ten percent (10%) computed on the (SRLP) list price less a 25% container deduction.

    (b) With respect to each particular type of record sold in Canada and Japan (including records exported to third parties in Canada and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Eighty Five percent (85%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (c) With respect to each particular type of record sold in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the European Economic Community (including records exported to third parties for such territories and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Sixty Five percent (65%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (d) With respect to each particular type of record sold for any territory throughout world not specifically mentioned in subparagraph 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c) (including records exported to third parties in such territories and for which Company is paid by such third parties), royalties shall accrue at Fifty percent (50%) the rate applicable under subparagraph 6(a).

    (e) With respect to records sold at Company's or its distributor's "mid line" price level through normal trade channels, royalties shall be at Seventy Five percent (75%) the rate set forth in subparagraph 6(a).

    (f) With respect to records sold at Company's or its distributor's "budget line" price level through normal trade channels, royalties shall be at Fifty percent (50%) the rate set forth in subparagraph 6(a).

    (g) Sales of any Singles, Extended Play Singles and recordings in the United States which are not long playing Albums shall be paid at the rate of Ten percent (10%) computed on the (SRLP) list price less container deductions and any taxes. Sales outside the United States shall be proportionally reduced according to the formula specified in 6(b), (c) and (d) above.

    (h) With respect to the licensing of the Master Recordings to third parties, including but not limited to usage such as record clubs, compilation records and synchronization usage, royalties shall be at the rate of Fifty percent (50%) of the net amount of any such fees received by Company, its licensees or assigns.

    (i) No royalties whatsoever shall be payable to Artist hereunder with respect to records (i) distributed to any person or entity primarily for purposes of promotion, (ii) sold as "scrap", "overstock" or "surplus", (iii) distributed as "free goods" (limited to no more than 20% or "bonus" records).

    (I'm surprised there isn't a clause about shaking the artist by the ankles on a monthly basis to get his loose change.)

    Beyond that, the more common kickback to organized crime in the music business in the 50's - 60's was cash applied to payola to help the "investments" of organized crime climb the charts.

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
  24. CDs in Mexico, a personal report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a British software developer living in a small town on the Pacific coast two hundred miles north of Acapulco. A good weekly income here is 1000 Pesos (US$100), a professional with a college degreee might make 1500 Pesos (US$150) a week. The local Commerical Mexicana, a WalMart equivalent, charges roughly the same for CDs as in the US, so a single CD is at least 10% of gross weekly income.
    Of course people don't buy their CDs from Commercial Mexicana, they buy them from the smaller music stores, whose stock is almost entirely CD-R-based, and who charge more like 30 Pesos.
    When I first moved here I spent a couple of hours at a restaurant having my brain picked by Juan Carlos, a Mexican "Del-boy" (the dodgy-goods trading hero of "Only Fools and Horses"). He was interested in improving the hard drive capacity of his CD duplicating kit -- the time he had to spend each day ripping master CDs to the burner's hard drive was down-time for the burner, and so being able to hold a larger library of masters on the hard drive would reduce the number of rips he had to do each day to meet that day's orders.
    I don't condone such blatant copyright infringement, but the fact is that the CD-R makers are selling to people who would not spend the equivalent on 'official' discs (when I first moved to the US CDs were half the price I'd been paying in the UK, so I probably tripled or quadrupled the number of CDs I bought, doubling the amount I spent.)
    The ultimate solution for the record companies has two prongs. First, the per capita income of the target market can be raised, but that's out of their hands and is hard to do in an economy that is hampered by some degree of corruption and by import/export tariffs that are high (or worse, indeterminate -- importing goods into Mexico may be legal, but the process is very erratic, which makes it hard to establish a reliable supply-chain). Second, bring the unit price more in line with the disposable income of the target market.

  25. nope, it's retarded goons who cause the problems by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    NOPE a real patriot is both intelligent and a student of history, past and reasonably current. A real patriot is able to recognize patterns of deceit and apply them to current events. A real patriot learns from his own and other country's past actions and learns to not keep making the same mistakes over and over and over again. A real patriot can look at a scam, see it for a scam, recognize scams from the past, see where the junta has used scams in the past, and is brave and smart enough to say NO, NEVER AGAIN! A real patriot isn't hungup on political parties and rhetoric, a real patriot is not a member of some fanboy cult over some "leader" or "political party" and stays blind to their misdeeds in the past, a real patriot LOOKS at what individuals do as compared to what they say, and is able to figure out reality rather than have it dictated to them. A real patriot doesn't use the "nuhremberg defense" to excuse illegal actions. A real patriot has the courage to NOT follow illegal orders and to speak out when they see criminality in their ranks and in their superiors actions in the government.

    The world has tried the lock step goose stepping methods, it doesn't work, it's heinous and criminal. Real patriots have the courage to actually follow their oaths, and not just BLINDLY follow orders. A real patriot will do these things, false patriots full of bravado and lacking intelligence will follow the old ways that lead to "sieg heil" actions.

    Learn from history or be destined to repeat it, you have a binary choice there.

  26. Re:Ah, Mexico by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Funny
    the Mexican Army routinely attacks the US Border Patrol to provide protection for the drug runners. Just last week in Arizona a Border Patrol SUV was shot up by a Mexican Army HummVee

    Oh, yes. One of these days we're going to cross the Rio Grande and kick your capitalist butts.

    We have elite teams of car thiefs that can take the threads and wheels off of a tank in less time than it takes to start the engine, and leave it standing on four cinder blocks. Even if the tank happens to be moving.

    We have crack groups of squatters that can invade and occupy any size territory in less time than it takes you to scream "cucaracha".

    Our drug dealers have more firepower than the 3rd Marine Division. And they dress better, too.

    The only problem right now are our nuclear weapons, since they require a match to activate. But we're working on more advanced technology - Zippo lighters.

    We're going to take back California, Arizona, Texas and New Mexico. And then we'll march up to Chicago to link up with our 2 million-strong sleeper cell there.

    Be afraid, be very afraid.

  27. Re:Ah, Mexico by Vuarnet · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have elite teams of car thiefs that can take the threads and wheels off of a tank in less time than it takes to start the engine, and leave it standing on four cinder blocks. Even if the tank happens to be moving.

    Heh. I've always wanted to see the "missing scenes" from Independence Day where a big mothership hovers over Mexico City, and goes down under millions of beggars, window-cleaners, juggler kids and fire-eaters. And gets robbed of everything that looks shiny or valuable enough, to be sold later in Tepito.

    That is, if said mothership actually finds Mexico City under all that smog...

    --
    Tongue-tied and twisted, just an earth-bound misfit, I
    Learning to fly, Pink Floyd.