The average cell phone is already more "usefull" than the average house phone. Cell phone marketers are trying to get those crazy teens with expendable cash to buy their gadgets. They want games! They want pretty colors! They want ringtones! Heck, if I was a teen right now, I'd buy one! (I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!)
There are many factors that contribute to a woman wanting to go through fertility treatment besides wanting "their own DNA." Such as the experience of pregnancy and giving birth. Also, there's more control over the prenatal process than through adoption. You can control how much alcohol you drink, how much you smoke, how much crack you do, etc. With adoption, you are at the whim of the birth mother.
My wife and I are currently proceeding with adopting a child after unsuccessful infertility treatments (we didn't do IVF) and the adoption process introduces a great number of factors such as doing public, private or international adoptions with each having numerous pros and cons. Adoption can be an extremely complex and emotional process and is not as easy as picking up a baby at the local hospital.
I think that people who go through fertility treatments are no less selfish than those that go through adoption. People have different comfort levels with different things and they have to do what feels natural to them.
The only way I can see getting around this would be for Google to add "Did you mean 'apple' as a _fruit_, _computer company_, or _fiona apple_?" to the top of the listings, to drill down more specifically.
This is an excellent idea! Getty images already uses this technique when doing stock photo searches and it helps tremendously.
"They have the time and resources to authenticate and publish the other side."
Seriously? How long does it take to create a link on your site to an organization's rebuttal? Even if you had to add the text to your site, how long do you think that would take? I'm thinking 5 mins. This right to reply doesn't mean that for every piece of information you put on your site, you have to verify the information. It means that if an organization wishes to refute any disparaging remarks on your site that they have a legal avenue in which to defend themselves.
That's a great utopian view of the world where nobody has to work and everybody is happy. It's also extremely unrealistic, as well. Capitalism is a requirement of our republican and very competitive society. If you remove the competition from the way we live, you remove the very basis of our economy: The thought that if you work hard enough, you can enjoy life a little (or a lot) better than your neighbour. Without work, how do you decide who does what? Who becomes president or prime minister or supreme ruler?
People blame globalization for their woes, but if the US had an inclusive economy, people would complain that work was shifting from one state to the next. Corporations have and will always continue to shift large sections of work to where it is cheapest. However, a small company with 20 employees is unlikely to shift their 5 tech guys overseas because they'd likely find they spend just as much trying to manage that group overseas as they do locally.
There will always be opportunity whether you find it or make it yourself.
The Win2k server, in contrast, is a continuous pain in the arse.
The problem with arguing by specific example is that there are always examples of either scenario. I run two Win2000 servers and I haven't rebooted in months (and when I did, yes, it was to install patches). Heck, I went on vacation for a week and a half and there were no issues.
I work for a small company and the time to not only train myself but others in maintaining a linux machine just isn't practical.
Sure, wi-fi has the potential to finish that last-mile problem for Internet access, especially to rural areas, but there are greater applications for wireless technology such as home automation, moving your favorite songs to and from your car, or creating community networks (and I'm sure endless others...I'm just not that creative!).
Wireless hasn't penetrated the mainstream like the dot-com bubble has so it has a long way to go before the bubble pops, if it even becomes a bubble at all. Wireless is a great technology and one that I'd definitely invest in...and like a good investor I won't put all my eggs in one basket and invest only in wireless.
Check out the CPCC site. They clearly indicate on their site that they will be distributing royalties in 2003 and that they have $28 million ready for distribution.
The Copyright Board of Canada also states how the money should be distributed.
Slashdot Mirror
The average cell phone is already more "usefull" than the average house phone. Cell phone marketers are trying to get those crazy teens with expendable cash to buy their gadgets. They want games! They want pretty colors! They want ringtones! Heck, if I was a teen right now, I'd buy one! (I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!)
There are many factors that contribute to a woman wanting to go through fertility treatment besides wanting "their own DNA." Such as the experience of pregnancy and giving birth. Also, there's more control over the prenatal process than through adoption. You can control how much alcohol you drink, how much you smoke, how much crack you do, etc. With adoption, you are at the whim of the birth mother.
My wife and I are currently proceeding with adopting a child after unsuccessful infertility treatments (we didn't do IVF) and the adoption process introduces a great number of factors such as doing public, private or international adoptions with each having numerous pros and cons. Adoption can be an extremely complex and emotional process and is not as easy as picking up a baby at the local hospital.
I think that people who go through fertility treatments are no less selfish than those that go through adoption. People have different comfort levels with different things and they have to do what feels natural to them.
The only way I can see getting around this would be for Google to add "Did you mean 'apple' as a _fruit_, _computer company_, or _fiona apple_?" to the top of the listings, to drill down more specifically.
This is an excellent idea! Getty images already uses this technique when doing stock photo searches and it helps tremendously.
Handspring unit GPS magellan - 12 channel - $49
Good mapping software for $29
Sprint phone module from ebay for $20
Calling your friends from a ditch because your GPS was wrong: priceless.
That sounds like MSN botulism. Which I suppose isn't a far off comparison.
"They have the time and resources to authenticate and publish the other side."
Seriously? How long does it take to create a link on your site to an organization's rebuttal? Even if you had to add the text to your site, how long do you think that would take? I'm thinking 5 mins. This right to reply doesn't mean that for every piece of information you put on your site, you have to verify the information. It means that if an organization wishes to refute any disparaging remarks on your site that they have a legal avenue in which to defend themselves.
That's a great utopian view of the world where nobody has to work and everybody is happy. It's also extremely unrealistic, as well. Capitalism is a requirement of our republican and very competitive society. If you remove the competition from the way we live, you remove the very basis of our economy: The thought that if you work hard enough, you can enjoy life a little (or a lot) better than your neighbour. Without work, how do you decide who does what? Who becomes president or prime minister or supreme ruler?
People blame globalization for their woes, but if the US had an inclusive economy, people would complain that work was shifting from one state to the next. Corporations have and will always continue to shift large sections of work to where it is cheapest. However, a small company with 20 employees is unlikely to shift their 5 tech guys overseas because they'd likely find they spend just as much trying to manage that group overseas as they do locally.
There will always be opportunity whether you find it or make it yourself.
March Networks already makes DVR's for emergency response vehicles.
The Win2k server, in contrast, is a continuous pain in the arse.
The problem with arguing by specific example is that there are always examples of either scenario. I run two Win2000 servers and I haven't rebooted in months (and when I did, yes, it was to install patches). Heck, I went on vacation for a week and a half and there were no issues.
I work for a small company and the time to not only train myself but others in maintaining a linux machine just isn't practical.
Did you guys run out of trees to cut down?
Nah, they're just importing it all from Canada. mmmmm, soft wood.
Sure, wi-fi has the potential to finish that last-mile problem for Internet access, especially to rural areas, but there are greater applications for wireless technology such as home automation, moving your favorite songs to and from your car, or creating community networks (and I'm sure endless others...I'm just not that creative!).
Wireless hasn't penetrated the mainstream like the dot-com bubble has so it has a long way to go before the bubble pops, if it even becomes a bubble at all. Wireless is a great technology and one that I'd definitely invest in...and like a good investor I won't put all my eggs in one basket and invest only in wireless.
Check out the CPCC site. They clearly indicate on their site that they will be distributing royalties in 2003 and that they have $28 million ready for distribution. The Copyright Board of Canada also states how the money should be distributed.