Slashdot Mirror


Putting A Lid On Chernobyl

slicer622 writes "Chernobyl is finally getting a containment structure (Washington Post). Billed as the largest moveable structure ever built, its designed to help take apart the wreckage and keep most of the radioactive material from spreading. It will be 800 feet across, and 300 feet high and will cost $800 mil."

36 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Quake 3 mapping. by kpdvx · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered what a Quake 3 map would look like in real life... :)

    For those of you who map, you'll know what I'm talking about. :)

    1. Re:Quake 3 mapping. by Spyffe · · Score: 5, Funny
      I always wondered what a Quake 3 map would look like in real life... :)

      Pretty much the same. But maybe the frame-rate will be a little lower, and textures won't be as detailed.
      Most of the "real world" was actually produced for viewing using the ATI Rage 128. That's why computer games have become more and more attractive compared to the "real world" since nVidia unleashed the GeForce3.
      Making matters worse, the physics model in the real world is also limited. For instance, rocket jumps are impossible because of improper collision detection between shards of the rocket casing and the jumper, resulting in shards improperly embedded in the body.
      Unfortunately, the world was intended for full simulation on what was considered powerful in the 1980s. (The world existed before that, but only in a 2-dimensional form suitable for reproduction on thin, 35mm film.)

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  2. Hundred Years? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The shelter is designed to keep water out and dust in for 100 years"

    Great, in 2108 we are screwed again.

    1. Re:Hundred Years? by eingram · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, in 2108 we are screwed again.

      That won't be our problem, though. ;)

    2. Re:Hundred Years? by Subcarrier · · Score: 5, Funny

      That won't be our problem, though. ;)

      Early indications are that kids from the Chernobyl fallout area will live to be at least 200 years old. The third arm comes in pretty handy, too.

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    3. Re:Hundred Years? by FTL · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > Great, in 2108 we are screwed again.

      This is actually really good design.

      The first sarcophagus was built in great haste over a hot reactor. The article points out there there are huge holes in the roof, but doesn't point out that the holes are a feature of the design, not a bug. If it were air-tight it would melt.

      It has been nearly 20 years, and the sarcophagus has done its job well. Conditions are much better, and it is time for a new containment structure that addresses the current requirements.

      In 100 years when the new structure is worn out, it will be time to reevaluate the conditions, and build a permenant enclosure. Suggestions I've heard are that a simple (but large) sand pile might be the best option at that time (presumably waterproofed on the outside).

      The requirement for a 100 year lifespan for the current enclosure is a good one. Any longer, and you end up designing something that has to perform two very different jobs.

      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    4. Re:Hundred Years? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 4, Funny

      speaking of sarcophagi...

      why not just build a pyramid around it? They've lasted 2000 years, haven't they? (Dead pharaoh, nuclear reactor... pah... big difference)

    5. Re:Hundred Years? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agree'd it was a good artical but not saying that it was never ment to be air tight was missleading.

      The other flaw of the article was it writes as if the core exploded which is incorrect. The explosion was a steam explosion when all the coolent boiled. This is what blew it apart. By some reports the rods from the core went for miles all around. It wasn't a nuclear blast. Thats why it was so bad from a radiation point. There was never a proper reaction to deal with the radiation. Now granted the explosion was caused by people doing something they shouldn't have causing the melt down. They had turned off all safty messures and were running an un-authorized experiment. It got away on them and there was no stopping it. This meltdown wasn't an accident. It was an orginized effort at being stupid. This is why chernobyl is a poor reason to call Nuclear power unsafe. It wasn't an accident, it wasn't a function of the reactor. Granted if they had a good containment dome everything probably would have been ok. Also if they hadn't done something they should have never been doing.

      3 mile island had and accident, though once again it was do to something stupid, a pump turned off and no one knew. A good part of the core melted. But since there was a proper dome no radiation was released. And because of what was learned there plants are even safer now.

      Nuke power is very safe, and clean. I much prefer one of them then a coal plant around. Also considering how shady reactors in countries like russia are it's very impressive there has only been one bad incident and it wasn't do to a design flaw.

    6. Re:Hundred Years? by Graff · · Score: 4, Informative
      Evaculate all the people, detonate a neutron bomb at high altitude, move back in and operate normally. The spray of neutrons from such a bomb would make all the radioactive atoms decay on the spot.

      Uh, no.

      First of all, neutrons are stopped fairly easily by minimal shielding. Most of the irradiated debris would not get bombarded by a single neutron from that neutron bomb.

      Secondly, adding a neutron to an atom will have wildly differing effects depending on many factors such as the speed of the neutron, the geometry of the collision, and the nuclear structure of the atom. Some atoms, such as hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and other light elements tend to form stable or long-lived isotopes that give off fairly low levels of radiation. Others, such as uranium, can form highly radioactive elements and can start limited chain reactions - not a good idea in a closed environment. Take a look at this site for more information on nuclear chemistry.

      One last thing you should know is that a neutron bomb is not a totally "clean" bomb. It still has a pretty decent amount of radioactive fallout, it just tends to produce quicker forms of radiation which will dissipate more easily. There will still be a fairly "hot" zone which will only add to the bad situation in Chernobyl.

      Still, this is probably just a troll judging from your comment about the whole mess being cleaned up in a week. I thought you trolls were attending some sort of training sessions on how to be subtle? If you are then you had better take a refresher course on troll techniques, the first one didn't take.
    7. Re:Hundred Years? by Obasan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A little extra-curricular work if you are interested in the subject.

      How many people die every year as a result of coal mining, and respiratory related illnesses due to our use of coal as a source of energy?

      How many people die every year in oil extraction & refining? How many from petroleum based airborn pollutants released when petroleum products are burned in generating stations? (In fact, to make it easier, just look at Nigeria. One country alone is more than sufficient to make my point.)

      Now I'll do this bit for you. :) Not a single worker or member of the public has been killed by a commercial nuclear power plant in any country using nuclear power with the exception of Chernobyl and more recently Japan (2 deaths). There are currently 103 nuclear plants in the US providing some 20% of US power. France has 56 nuclear plants generating some 76% of their electricity. Yet there have been no fatal accidents in these countries. Compare this with the hundreds+ dead every year in oil and gas explosions in developing countries, dozens of miners killed every year even in North America where safety standards are very high... not even looking at the closer to hundreds or thousands of coal miners that die in poorer countries like the Ukraine.

      If this is not enough to persuade you, consider this. Oil funds terrorism. It is that simple. It was oil money that allowed Sep. 11 to take place. If you are going to follow the full cycle "toll" of using fossil fuels, you had better tally in another 3000 dead for the year 2001, and who knows how many in the future. Bush's claims that drugs fund terrorism is a red herring - the Taliban had banned and actively executed those who cultivated opium poppies. It was the Northern Alliance that was exporting heroin as a means of funding their civil war. (Hint: they are our ALLIES).

      "Nuclear" has become a bogeyman, when you look at the facts, it is the safest alternative.

  3. Thats All Great but.... by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    what happens if the existing "sarcophagus" fails after the bigger one is built over top of it? Couldn't this still be a disasterous problem? After all, I've heard before that if it were to cave in, it'd be like having the accident all over again.

    1. Re:Thats All Great but.... by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 3, Informative

      what happens if the existing "sarcophagus" fails after the bigger one is built over top of it?

      If the existing sarcophagus fails inside the new one, the dust and debris that are kicked up will remain inside the outer structure. The purpose of the outer structure is to prevent this dust from being picked up by the wind and contaminating the surrounding countryside.

      --
      "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
    2. Re:Thats All Great but.... by Kanasta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what happens if the existing "sarcophagus" fails and there's no new one over it?

      I don't see how having a new one over it could make it any /more/ dangerous...

  4. Why Shouldn't You Wear Russian Pants? by yoyona · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because Chernobyl Fallout.

  5. Radioactive Christmas trees by Spudley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ties in nicely with the story today about radioactive Christmas trees being sold by russian businessmen.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Radioactive Christmas trees by hendridm · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Radioactive Christmas trees (Score:4, Funny)

      Only on Slashdot could this be modded as 'Funny'. I suggest doing a Google search for "Chernobyl Pictures".

  6. And that's not the REALLY scary part by core+plexus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They want to reopen Chernobyl. This article states "Officials from the European Bank for Reconstruction have criticised plans by the Ukrainian authorities to reopen a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. They say they are concerned about the safety of reactor number three, which sits next to the remains of the world's worst nuclear disaster, because of a failure to put in place extra safety measures that had been agreed. " Here is a link about the facilities.

    1. Re:And that's not the REALLY scary part by core+plexus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here are some newer ones, sorry: SFChron NYTimes Try here for more.

    2. Re:And that's not the REALLY scary part by FTL · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > They want to reopen Chernobyl.

      It's not as scary as it sounds. Two reasons:

      1. The Ukranian government has a history of politically milking Chernobyl for all it's worth. Need some foreign loans? No problem, just pull out the Chernobyl reactivation plans (again) and watch Europe go nuts and provide aid (again). Rinse, repeat. Take these plans with a grain of salt.
      2. Even if Chernobyl were reactivated, it isn't that big of a deal. Chernobyl isn't as ludicrously safe as western reactors, but it isn't bad. The only reason it blew up is that the _mechanical_ engineers were running a test to see what would happen if they turned off all the safety systems, removed all the control rods, and shut off the power (duh). The _nuclear_ engineers were horrified at the proposed test, but under the Soviet system they didn't get veto power.
      --
      Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  7. Riders of the Apocolypse? No joke. by MickLinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Chernobyl is named for a small, bitter herb, "chernoblis", that grows in the region. Of course, that's the Ukranian word. In English, the herb is called "wormwood."

    No joke.

    Of course, to quote my father when he heard that, "That's nonsense. Chernobyl wasn't a star. A star is a ...

    !!!

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  8. Obvious Russian Solution by limekiller4 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Leave it to the Russians to come up with a solution that is, in essence, one big matrioshka doll.

    Now I want to see the heir of the peasant who invented these things sue for IP infringement.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  9. Twighlight Zone by checkitout · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me of a "new" Twighlight Zone episode circa 1987, where a guy has a fallout shelter in his basement.

    His wife and kid go to the grandmothers for the weekend. Meanwhile, he's chilling with his friend drinking a beer, and a nuclear bomb touches down. They both go into the fallout shelter. They guy thinks he's lost his wife and kid forever.

    Months go by in the fallout shelter, and external radiation levels aren't going down. They can't tell if the detector is broken, or what. Eventually some "scavengers" come pounding on the door, and the father has to stop his friend from making any noise.

    More months go by, there's an argument and the friend finally says fuck it and leaves. Now the father is by himself, and even more months go by... finally he decides it's hopeless, puts on his sunglasses and heads out of the fallout shelter.

    Next scene, the wife and son are looking at the father's grave. Talking about him, etc. Then the camera pans up, and there's the city about 10 miles away with a huge glass dome over it.

    I found this summary of the episode as well:

    Shelter Skelter
    Teleplay by : Ron Cobb & Robin Love
    Based on a story by : Ron Cobb
    Directed by : Martha Coolidge
    Starring : Joe Mantegna; Joan Allen
    Summary : A survivalist believes he has lived through a nuclear war in his shelter. In reality, it was an accident which destroyed his town and contributed to bringing peace to Earth, and he has been entombed for ever.

    1. Re:Twighlight Zone by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have this episode sitting on my TiVo right now, and you're almost right. This is one of my favorite NTZ eps, so allow me to summarize:

      The wife and kid are out of town at a relative's house.

      The nuclear detonation is from an accident at a nearby airbase while the crews were preparing the planes in case of war.

      The 'scavengers' Joe Mantegna and his buddy hear are actually recovery crews looking for survivors, and bulldozing the contaminated rubble into as small an area as possible prior to encasing it in the concrete dome later to be known as the "Peace Dome."

      Eventually Joe Mantegna's buddy goes stir crazy and leaves the shelter, against Mantegna's wishes. He later returns and begs for readmission to the shelter, but Mantegna refuses because the buddy is now contaminated.

      The ending is great-- the camera focuses in on Joe Mantegna, sitting alone in his shelter/tomb... it slowly pulls back, 'through' the door and into the dead world outside. Mantegna's buddy is lying dead outside the door, IIRC. We get to see a lot of blackened rubble and destroyed cars (think the scenes from 2029 in the Terminator flicks), and it's dark as night. The camera keeps pulling back, and then goes through another wall, and boom, suddenly there's birds singing, green grass, blue sky, and sunshine. Cut to a reporter who fills the audience in on the Peace Dome. Then we see the wife and kid. Presumably the wife knows Mantegna is still in there, but has decided that since he was so overbearing and loved the shelter so much, she'll just let him die in it so she can be free.

      ~Philly

  10. Cost by dokutake · · Score: 5, Informative

    It will be 800 feet across, and 300 feet high and will cost $800 mil.

    The dome itself will not cost $800 million, the whole project, including cleaning up inside the dome once it's there, will cost $768 million.

    --
    - Peter
  11. Photos and Poetry from Pripyat. The worker's town. by muonzoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I stumbled (ok Googled) across some interesting and moving photos from Pripyat, the town where the Chernobyl workers were housed.
    Shocking and worth a read / look.

  12. Re:Surrounding areas by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Informative

    About 7 years ago they built a huge concrete wall that goes underground and is meant to stop the flow of groundwater(to some extent) from the contaminated areas. The last I read of this said that the wall had begun to fail. The Pripyat River, which was Chernobyl's water supply, was severely contaminated.

    This map shows the "hot zone." It actually covers quite a large area.

  13. Chernobyl accident information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of stories about the Chernobyl accident can be found here.

    Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster On April 25th -26th, 1986 the World's worst nuclear power accident occurred at Chernobyl in the former USSR (now Ukraine). The Chernobyl nuclear power plant located 80 miles north of Kiev had 4 reactors and whilst testing reactor number 4 numerous safety procedures were disregarded. At 1:23am the chain reaction in the reactor became out of control creating explosions and a fireball which blew off the reactor's heavy steel and concrete lid.

    The Chernobyl accident killed more than 30 people immediately, and as a result of the high radiation levels in the surrounding 20-mile radius, 135,00 people had to be evacuated.

  14. Cover Story by limekiller4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've seen more than enough movies to realize that this is a mere cover story to hide the real purpose of this "container" -- sheilding a priveleged few thousand against a rogue earthbound asteroid.

    I'll bet you ten bucks that nobody knows where Bruce Willis is right now, either.

    Can't fool ME.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  15. Changes not as big as people thought by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    according to this article The impact on wildlife and even humans is not as worse as people thought it would be.

    For example: Years ago, some researchers theorized that a severe nuclear accident like the one at Chernobyl would cause such severe genetic damage that animals would be born showing drastic changes in appearance. So far, the Chernobyl accident has not borne that out, the researchers note.
    and
    "For instance, there are probably two million people in the contaminated areas, and only a few thousand are actually sick from diseases than can be reasonably linked to the high levels of radioactive contaminants. We really don't know why this is yet," said Dallas.

  16. Why build another one by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Psssst - I know where you might be able to pick up a suitable enclosure really cheaply, if you don't mind using second hand equipment. As an added benefit - it seems to do a good job of discouraging tourists! ;-)

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  17. Re:Mutants? by glwtta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course all the animals were radically affected. Approximately half of these animals are now gigantic and are terrorizing Japan as we speak. The other half have become smart-talking, hip ninjas.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  18. How wonderful... by ATAMAH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After this tragedy occured soldiers were volunteered
    to go there and die fighting with fire and radiation. Many lost their homes and were evacuted to the town i lived in. We got lucky - the wind was in the other direction. Nevertheless streets had to be washed literally - trucks were spraying water everywhere trying to wash off the radioactive dust.

    Many thousands of people died in Chernobyl. Many more are STILL dying from this disaster. It was a tragedy. Please don't joke about it. It's beyond "dark humor" IMHO.

  19. Expert's Input... by miketang16 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "If it weren't for the radioactivity, I could almost call the job 'a piece of cake,' but the radiation makes it hugely complex and extremely difficult."

    Yea... and if it weren't for the radiation you wouldn't even be building the 'piece of cake'.

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
  20. Re:Reactor covers, build it before the accident! by nuintari · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't build a reactor cover before a plant blows and hope it to be of any use. Unless you really want to ignore the nasty effects of a nuclear blast. Any structure built over a reactor would be blow sky high, and throw the structure materials off at hundreds of miles per hour, turning the entire plant into one giant nuclear claymore mine. You build them so they don't blow up, and use common sense, which the soviet government did not have, the test they demanded are what caused the accident.

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  21. largest moveable structure ever built by csguy314 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It will be 800 feet across, and 300 feet high and will cost $800 mil.

    And after being used to move the Chernobyl remains, Cowboy Neal will be using it as a car.

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
  22. Re:Current costs are ~ . . . by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not to mention that the process would be worse than the equivilant of cleaning up the dog's accident on the carpet and carrying it, balance pecuriously on a peice of newspaper, right over you family xmas dinner, on the way to the trash can.