Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

HomePod Brings Music from iTunes to the Living Room

Posted by pudge on from the join-us-now-and-share-the-music-you'll-be-freeeee dept.

sammy.lost-angel.com writes "News.com has a story about HomePod, a device by Gloolabs that streams music wirelessly from your Mac to your living room. It's based on a Java application. The device is not very pretty, but it is priced right at $199." Not for nothing, but you can buy a used clamshell iBook for just a little bit more, and use that (along with something like iCommune, or just loading the MP3s to your library ia file sharing) ... but these guys are right, this market is going to take off, sooner or later.

23 of 41 comments (clear)

  1. not pretty? by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    --was just looking at the picture of the device, not sure why it's called "not pretty". It seems more or less like any other modern device, it's not kludgy looking or anything.

    1. Re:not pretty? by transient · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ... not sure why it's called "not pretty". It seems more or less like any other modern device ...

      Let's not forget the context of the discussion. Apple's industrial design is hardly "like any other modern device". Personally, I think that thing looks like an alarm clock.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    2. Re:not pretty? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny
      I thought it was at least going to copy some of Apple's design.

      Heh, yeah, nothing like getting sued by Apple to jump-start your company...

  2. Opposites attact. by Asterax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because it's large, cumbersome, a dark color, and non-symmetrical. Isn't that like the opposite of everything that Apple stands for when they are designing hardware?

    1. Re: Opposites attact. by andreas_ky · · Score: 2, Informative

      The CD slot's still in the front:

  3. SliMP3 - different feature set, same idea by pcrook345 · · Score: 5, Informative
    This looks like a less attractive version of the SliMP3 player from Slim Devices. There's an old Slashdot review by Taco, and a newer review on ONLamp.com (one year later, to the day).

    It will read iTunes playlists. The server (open source, written in Perl) can be run on OS X, or on a Windows or *nix machine. No built-in wireless or amplifier, but it's the slickest and smallest component in my stereo setup now, at the cost of running an ethernet cable into the living room.

    For me, the big advantage of the SliMP3 is the ability to interact with the large vacuum fluorescent display via a remote control from anywhere in the room. It would be less fun having to get up to read an LCD display (which looks tiny on the HomePod), or having to go to the computer to build a new playlist.

    1. Re:SliMP3 - different feature set, same idea by allenw · · Score: 5, Informative
      I picked up a SliMP3 and wanted to use it for wireless connectivity via a bridge, but it seems to be rather insecure in how it retrieves information from the network. (Just have someone pop up a server and take control of it. Whee!) Instead, we are re-organizing the hardware here at home and replaced our song playing box with it... but this still leaves me without 'living room' MP3 access.

      So, before I plunk down for one of these, I would have the same concerns about the HomePod [never mind the issue of it interfacing with our own MP3 server control software].

      In the quest for easy-to-use consumer devices, it appears that security is getting dumped by the wayside, which is ironic considering their target audience.

    2. Re:SliMP3 - different feature set, same idea by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For me, the big advantage of the SliMP3 is the ability to interact with the large vacuum fluorescent display via a remote control from anywhere in the room.

      But at $250, SLIMP3 sounds pretty expensive for (correct me if I'm wrong) an ethernet card and an MP3 decoder DAC chip. Plus it only plays MP3s -- I'd want to play my losslessly compressed CDs too.

      Or am I missing something?

      --
      Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
    3. Re:SliMP3 - different feature set, same idea by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      This looks like a less attractive version of the SliMP3 player from Slim Devices.

      Uh... the "SliMP3" (what the hell happened to nice names that a boy can pronounce?) is one of the ugliest pieces of kit I've ever laid eyes on. Saying that this thing is even uglier is going a long, long way in my book.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:SliMP3 - different feature set, same idea by jovlinger · · Score: 4, Informative

      insecure?

      If you mean that it opens a security hole, yes I would be concerned too.

      If you mean that it doesn't help your network WRT spoofing, well that would seem to be more of a transport issue (get WEP going on that bridge and lock down MAC addresses).

      If yopu mean that someone on your local can change what you're playing, well, that would seem to be a choice of security vs convenience, and I think that within the LAN, playing music falls into the convenience is king category.

  4. iJust Use My iPod by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... and connect a stereo miniplug-to-RCA adapter from it to the analog ins on my receiver.

    It gets better, we have some old multimedia Altec-Lansing "gaming" speakers (the ACS-56 ones I think) that I was going to ditch when I sold the machine they were originally connected to. With my wife's iPod, they gave us a fairly good stereo for a smaller room.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  5. Clamshell iBook's cheap? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 5, Informative
    Where?

    ...you can buy a used clamshell iBook for just a little bit more...


    According to Low End Mac's iBook Deals page, the original 300MHz iBook, with only 32 MB of RAM, a 3GB hard drive, and CD-ROM drive (i.e. the original stock configuration) is selling for $678 from used computer stores.

    Pricewatch shows one 366MHz model for $595 (and it even has a whopping 64MB of RAM, and a 6GB HD.)

    The cheapest one that sold in the past few weeks on eBay was a 300Mhz/64MB RAM/6GB HD model for $410.

    Now, I'm not one to nit-pick, but "a little bit more" should be less than twice as much. Heck, even 50% more isn't "a little bit" anymore. If I could get an old iBook for about $300, I'd have one.
    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:Clamshell iBook's cheap? by X_Caffeine · · Score: 2

      No kidding. Powerbook Duos still fetch close to $300.

      --
      // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    2. Re:Clamshell iBook's cheap? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2

      No, it was a native 2300 on Yahoo auctions. (Yahoo auctions seems to be full of rip-off artists, I've noticed. This is the second time I've gotten burned in three auctions on Yahoo. At least I have either not paid, or gotten my money back.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  6. but... by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While the SliMP3 is great, it's not wireless and costs more....but it is platform agnostic.

    I want wireless and Mac, so the HomePod wins this one :)

    Now, when can I buy one off the shelf from Fry's.

    BTW, if you want to simply send audio and video, pls check this site I did a while back - iTunes, wireless and Home Theater...and yes, this segment is hothothot.

    1. Re:but... by djupedal · · Score: 2

      At this time, I either let iTunes roll thru a playlist, or random.... I can admin via my Airport equipped iBook but that's hardly fair :)

      I've tried the wireless keyboard thing, and so far nothings worked out...now, a BlueTooth or 802.11g setup might be ok :)

  7. Cheaper solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Long speaker cables.

    I guess Mac fans can afford it though ;)

    1. Re:Cheaper solution. by TedTodorov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may be funny, but really it is the most relevant post in this thread. Why in the world would you want to spend $200 on something that can be accomplished with cables???

      If your whole stereo is in the other room, instead of long speaker cables you just need a long RCA stereo cable, with a mini-jack adapter at the Mac end.

      That or just hook up your iPod to your stereo.

      Ted

  8. iMac + Keyspan Digital Media Remote + Stereo by berniecase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have a Keyspan Digital Media Remote unit plugged into my iMac which is then hooked up to my stereo. Sounds great, and works really well. I have a learning remote with my receiver and I was able to program it with most of the functions of the Keyspan remote.

    It works a lot better than using iHam on iRye to control the iMac.

  9. iWant my iStereo by applematters · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wrote an article about an iStereo on AppleMatters: http://applematters.pmachinehosting.com/comments.p hp?id=P14_0_1_0 This device looks interesting and all the comments about the design of the thing are right on---its pretty ugly. That said the company has to be credited for at least bringing this to market. Apple should be doing this now.

    --
    AppleMatters http://www.applematters.com
  10. Skip the computer--iPod to Stereo by OECD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Griffin Technologies has this add on for your iPod. It broadcasts your music in FM, allowing you to tune it in on your stereo. It looks great AND it's only $35. (OK, it's not available just yet, but they're taking pre-orders.)

    Bonus: you don't have to run into the computer room to change the song!

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  11. Marketing mp3 in the post-Napster era by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The product design looks like someone married the famous tastefulness of Radio Shack with the dynamic energy of the Transformers. This thing can beam your mp3s, would look at home on any Sylvania pressboard console, and it can fight Voltron.

    But what's interesting to me is this statement from the article:

    '"It's a very clear problem," said David Arfin, CEO of Gloolabs. "There are 60 million people who have music (stored) on hard disks. Most of those people have stereos."'

    Yes, and 59.9 million of them got the files on Napster. So we see this interesting development: the music wanted to be free, according to the digidealists. Their 15 minutes is over, so they've been replaced by gizmo capitalists who say the music wants to be bounced by radio wave across our houses.

    Is there any analogy in our history to this kind of mass thievery eventually providing a cozy aftermarket to capitalism? (No points for mentioning the IRS.)

  12. I'm not impressed by hcdejong · · Score: 2

    So now, instead of walking to the computer to choose a song, I'm walking to my stereo to choose a song. That's no progress, it needs a remote.

    And why use 802.11? Wouldn't it be easier to have an FM transmitter next to the computer, so I can receive the audio with a credit-card-sized radio (they talk about using the HomePod in the garden. Yeah, right). And again, a remote controller to choose songs.

    And it's butt-ugly. On top (it won't fit anywhere else due to the display on top) of my neat stack of 44 cm wide black boxes, I've got some blue-gray blob with an antenna sticking out.

    And can the HomePod digitize audio and send it from the stereo to the computer?

    I'll stick with the RCA cables between my computer and stereo, thank you.