Slashdot Mirror


RIAA Settlement: Possible Consumer Payback

KoopaTroopa writes "Over on Ars Technica they are running a story about the RIAA handing out consumer payments as a settlement to a price-fixing class action. If you bought a recording at retail between Jan. 1, 1995, and Dec. 22, 2000, claim your money." As usual, the lawyers win a lot more than you will, but the process is pretty painless if you'd like to collect part of the settlement money; you may recall this earlier story about the settlement.

12 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Amen by PotatoMan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    That was exactly my feeling when I got to the sign-up page. I didn't mind some of the questions, but when I realized they had enough info to build my SSN from, and that the info was not secure, I started wondering if this site is real or not.


    I guess we'll know when the 'identity theft' ring goes into action.


    Preach it, Lamont!

    1. Re:Amen by onepoint · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that's not the point, the data of a corrilating name, with address, with/or po box, to IP addresss and age is perfect for marketers.

      the data is worth $20+ or more. because they will be able to say IP# 24.123.256.21 is cable modem in new england, human person with the age of XY, then if they can then cookie you, you'll be tagged for life.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  2. No thanks RIAA,already gave at <insrt-store> by trentfoley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering I pay the RIAA with every cdr I use, and that less than 1% of my cdr usage is for music, I feel that I am giving the RIAA enough already. That's all the justification I need.

  3. Helping OGG? by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given that probably the number of people signing on will bring the distribution below $5, and that then the money goes to not-for-profits that benefit "the music listening public" - can OGG get some of that money to help with development costs? I'm sure even just a lowly million would help things along.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  4. Re:Huh? by fendel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My local Best Buy has a hand-written sign up near the music CD-Rs claiming that they sound better and are more(!) flexible.

    I haven't figured out yet whether they're deliberately lying or just ignorant. (These are the same guys who had no idea what I meant when I told them they shouldn't leave their monitors in the PC section at the default 60hz.)

  5. Re:No thanks. by edbarrett · · Score: 3, Interesting
    you may as well get 5 bucks

    Read the terms, though: they have $67,375,000 to give out to anyone who's purchased a CD, cassette or record from the beginning of '95 to December 22 of double-naught. It doesn't take into account how may albums you bought; the money is split evenly for the class. If the numbers end up being less than $5 a head, "the cash portion of the Settlement shall be distributed to not-for-profit, charitable, governmental or public entities to be used for music-related purposes or programs for the benefit of consumers who purchased Music Products." So, if 13,475,000 people claim their chunk of the settlement, you get your $5 check. When Mr. 13,475,001 rolls along, the record companies /conspiracy theory/ will set up a not-for-profit shelter so they can hand the money right back to themselves /conspiracy theory/

  6. we're still prisoners to the RIAA by acroyear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as in they've given us a variation on the prisoner's dilemna -- if nobody asks for it, nobody gets it. if one person asks for it and the other refuses, then one person gets the money and the other gets screwed. if both people ask for it, nobody gets it. just goes to show the RIAA still doesn't respect us and wants us in our place -- as prisoners to their control over our entertainment.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  7. Consider the consequences! by Raetsel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    JWZ had a very good point -- this was discussed on BoingBoing, and here's what he had to say:
    • "Doesn't taking their $20 payoff constitute an agreement that they have paid their debt? If they have in fact engaged in price fixing, they owe us a hell of a lot more than $20 each. I suspect that taking the $20 in hush-money will preclude one from participating in any future, similar legal action against them."
    Damn skippy.

    Too bad I don't have Microsoft-level resources for lawyers, or I might end up owning the RIAA. (Yeah, right.) On second thought, I'd better be careful -- MS might get ideas...

    The question of SSNs also came up, and was addressed -- it looks like they have a legitimate reason for asking.

    --

    "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
  8. Re:Signing also says you agree. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In fact, everyone should go beyond just passively not claiming their share of this settlement, and actually submit the appropriate paperwork to exclude yourselves, in essence rejecting the settlement. We all know this isn't a fair compensation, and the more people who speak out and say so the better the chances that a more equitable settlement will be reached.

  9. I wonder if anyone noticed by tonyzeb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if any one noticed that the settlement was for 67 MILLION dollars? That means 13 MILLION people have to sign up for it before it goes below 5 bucks a person. I like Slashdot, but I dont' think there are that many readers. If less than three million people sign up, which seems reasonable to say, everyone gets Twenty bucks. Cool. Besides, anyone who is a REAL freak about their personal information would have a PO BOX, and wouldn't care. Amateurs.

  10. Re:21 cents?!? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It could be worse. Norway actually had to pass legislation to change the tax law so you wouldn't be liable for more than 100% of your income. Apparently it was happening all too often.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  11. And what happens at $5/claimant? by tvsjr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Did you read the description of where the money will go if the settlement drops below $5 per claimant?


    Rather, the cash portion of the Settlement shall be distributed to not-for-profit, charitable, governmental or public entities to be used for music-related purposes or programs for the benefit of consumers who purchased Music Products.


    So, what do you bet the defendants will publicize this heavily and get enough claimants to drop below $5/claimant? Then, they'll get the money funneled into not-for-profit, charaitable, etc. organizations aligned with the distributors and the RIAA. They'll lose money out of the general fund, but it'll get pushed back into other organizations they control.

    Wait and see...