Slashdot Mirror


South Pole to Get Highway

tetrad writes "The New Scientist magazine reports that the US is building a road to the South Pole. The "highway" would cross the Ross Ice Shelf and then pass through the Transantarctic Mountains (map here). Convoys of tractors will be the only traffic on the road, bringing fuel and heavy equipment to the South Pole, as well as enabling the installation of a $250M fibre-optic communications cable (discussed previously)."

66 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. About Time! by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 5, Funny

    All I can say is "about time!" I've been waiting for this for years. I mean, now I can finally go to South Pole Disneyland.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:About Time! by Negatyfus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would give almost anything to see Mickey Mouse freeze to death.

    2. Re:About Time! by YAN3D · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heres some other guys who are happy.

      TheBoys

    3. Re:About Time! by gabec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I told my friend about this article and her response was: "Hah! Forget world hunger and stopping war, let's build a road to the moon!" lol.

    4. Re:About Time! by vidnet · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't that what Disney on Ice is?

    5. Re:About Time! by CrayzyJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      she meant elevator to the moon, right?

      --
      Holy s-, it's Jesus!
  2. Two birds with one stone by OldStash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yay! Now people can contribute to global warming and measure it at the same time!

    1. Re:Two birds with one stone by Mantrid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, I embrace global warming! Bring it on already! It's fricking freezing here!

    2. Re:Two birds with one stone by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I must be the only person in New England who is glad it's -2F outside right now. I'm in downtown Big City NH, in a room 22x18 feet- there's 22 terminal servers (pun not intended, you'll see), 2 7000 series cisco routers, 6 dell 2450s each with add on RAID, a 6450, two something called "VA Linux" servers, and about 15 x86 boxes. Of course theres a bunch of switches and UPS units, as well as a forced hot water pipe. There's a dead 60,000 BTU A/C in the corner, and 2 48 inch windows on the same side of the room. I've got a 36 inch industrial fan sucking the air in from outside (-2F mind you), and yesterday, it took 18 minutes of that to get the temperature in here from 102F to 72F.

      Most annoying part about getting your AC fixed when it's -2F? Getting your provider to stop laughing and hanging up on you before you can get the service department. Yeesh.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    3. Re:Two birds with one stone by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that every reputable environmentalist (read: not PETA) has already said that "global warming is not a good name - the word is climactic shift".

      The actual level of warming is insignificant - we're talking an average 1.5 degrees C or something. Nobody cares about that little bit of warming. Only the blowhards (yes, leftists have our embarrassing equilvalents to Rush Limbaugh too) think that. The real concern is how this change is effecting the weather. Anyone who's studied the thermodynamics realizes how much a tiny temperature change can do to weather patterns worldwide - so the problem is we get hurricanes in deserts, droughts in rainforests, blizzards in california, and generally worldwide crop failure. Pardon me, but I like to eat.

      Weather is a very fractal thing - push it slightly one way and it will change completely across the board. Both the natural and artificial world rely on expecting certain weather - our crops, our forests, and our cities expect certain things. Only certain cities are prepared for hurricanes (and I'm sure you've noticed the increase in major hurricanes in recent years).

      Global warming is not a problem. Talk to real experts and not loony treehuggers, and you'll hear about the climactic shift that is closely related to global warming. That is a threat to humanity and the planet's ecosystems.

      The other legitamate environmental concern is local pollution. You think that the Ganges is the only polluted body of water? Here's a hint - your local factories also pollute the water. They just pollute it in less obvious ways - not nasty agricultural runoff that covers the lake in icky slimy algae, but more sinister things. In my town, the bay water looks fine. You can get bad swimmers itch at the beaches, so you can only swim from a boat - but still that's just regular chemical imbalances producing unnatural ecosystems. The real concern is the water is carcinogenic. There's a coking mill on the edge of the water, and the runnoff from that means that anyone who swims a lot or drinks a lot of that water will probably end up a hospital a few years down the road. This is not a third world country - this is part of the great lakes.

      The third concern is concentration of toxins - sure, they're only generating a couple of gallons - but when one part per million can kill you down the road, and the stuff takes decades to break down (many nasty aromatic hydrocarbons are that persistant), you probably don't want that stuff being vented anywhere near people. But they do anyways. The world is big, but benzene is still benzene.

      Environmental concerns are legitamate - the problem is that a large number of environmentalists are extremist lunatics. But really, its no different then if we had people like RMS and JonKatz speaking up for us computer people. Just because the people you hear about in a movement are idiots doesn't mean the movement is wrong.

    4. Re:Two birds with one stone by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Environmental concerns are legitamate - the problem is that a large number of environmentalists are extremist lunatics. But really, its no different then if we had people like RMS and JonKatz speaking up for us computer people. Just because the people you hear about in a movement are idiots doesn't mean the movement is wrong.

      True, but there is also a decisive lack of concrete evidence (non-circumstancial) that would say the climactic shift has anything to do with humans. Natural cycles of planetary systems modify temperature, as do ocean currents (which do change frequently) so I personally don't think humanity is doing much to contribute one way or the other. If the ocean currents stop or slow, we'll have a mini-ice age, then all your climactic shift concerns will be going for the other way.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  3. Ok, but why? by soulctcher · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of this money that they're wasting could go to feed all of the starving programmers... ...oh wait, I figured it out now. This is where they're SENDING the starving programmers.

    1. Re:Ok, but why? by Negatyfus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but we're just the first group to be evacuated. Two other tractors will be sent after us with the rest of the people, they told us.

  4. says who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did they ask the rest of the world, or did they just assume ownership of the south pole??

    1. Re:says who? by big_groo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Basically, yes - and they've reserved the right to do just that.

      Check out the CIA World Factbook entry on the US here.

      Scroll down to the very end and read 'Internationl Disputes'.

    2. Re:says who? by idletask · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I don't know what can qualify as ownership when it comes to Antarctica, but many countries have established points on this continent:

      • USA, with MacMurdo (how strange that the highway would go this way, isn't it?), Amundsen-Scott;
      • Russia, with Vostok (with the world record of low temperature, -89C - ouch), Mienyy, Molodezhnaya, Leningradskaya;
      • Argentina, with General Belgrano;
      • Great Britain, with Haley;
      • Australia, with Davis, Casey;
      • Japan, with Mizuho;
      • New Zealand, with Scott.

      If any of this country disagrees with this highway (well, except USA, that is), surely enough they will get heard soon enough.

  5. Sounds good... by JHMirage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Traffic should be pretty light, and I bet I can speed with abandon, but I gotta believe that the tolls will be a bitch!

    --

    A man talking sense to himself is no madder than a man talking nonsense not to himself.
    1. Re:Sounds good... by malarkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's a real job for any geek--Toll Booth Operator on the South Pole Highway.

      As long as you can tap into the fiber optic wire that passes by.

  6. Longevity? by mbredden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, so they're building a road across Antarctica. Are they going to clear all the snow and ice, and build the road on actual terra firma? Or are they just going to build it on top of ice? If they build it on ice, and in 20-50 years that ice melts down somewhat because of (manmade global warming/natural global warming/my ass), the road would be in fairly rough shape if not impassable. I'm imagining this is going to be a costly project and any roadway that they're going to pour THAT kind of money into they are going to expect a fairly long lifespan from.

    1. Re:Longevity? by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you can explain to me how it would even be POSSIBLE to park a geo-synchronous satellite over the South Pole. Since the principle of operation of geo-synchronous satellite is that it's orbital speed == the speed of the earth's rotation over which it's parked, and that the speed of rotation at the earth's poles is by definition zero, that would mean the satellite would have to be orbitting at speed zero. Doesn't seem too likely, does it.

      Sean

    2. Re:Longevity? by AGMW · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Satelites have to orbit the Earth (or any body) over a Great Circle, and it just so happens that if that Great Circle is the Equator, then the satelite can appear to be stationary to an Earth observer.

      You could put a few satelites in a Polar Orbit so that at any one time one or more of them would be visible. You would have to be able to switch the signal between the satelites as they came into and left LoS with the Pole (whichever one you were at), but isn't that just like Mobile Phones when your are driving (with hands-free of course) and it switches you between cells?

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
  7. another solution by nyc_paladin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can't we just give them segways with snow wheels instead?

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. --Edmund Burke
  8. Structural problems by skubalon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't that have some significant problems in structural stability. I mean it's built on an ice shelf. Ice floats. Antarctic ice shelves have been known to dissapear

    Sounds like a waste of money to me!

    1. Re:Structural problems by Beatbyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      If it were a proper highway with rock base, it would have problems. The ice shifts a few meters per year. Cracking and breaking would be the result. They're basically using large tractors to carve a road into the ice and smooth it out to be flattened into a "road".

      Although its not floating. Its a 4km thick piece of ice on top of land.

  9. Fibre optics by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny
    So the Antarctic scientists get broadband before my village in England?

    Now they'll be 0wning me at Quake, in between sexing penguins or whatever they do ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  10. Gas stations? by tbaggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wonder if they'll have the signs on the highway that say "Last chance for gas - next station 1000km away"

    And..how about the poor soul that has to actually WORK at that station!

    1. Re:Gas stations? by Ballsy · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Of course they won't. The signs will be in miles, since the US insist on maintaining their archaic measurement units instead of migrating to something more widely accepted, like metric.
      As for the guy working at the station, he'll be fine, as long as they build a Tim Horton's beside it.

    2. Re:Gas stations? by kievit · · Score: 5, Informative

      And..how about the poor soul that has to actually WORK at that station!

      Well, it ain't that bad. I work for the Amanda/IceCube experiment. I did not yet go there myself, but a colleague just returned and she found it absolutely great there. For several reasons: the natural phenomena there are quite special, for instance the halo of the sun. Also the working atmosphere is very different from normal, the "level of enthusiasm" among the few hundred researchers (of several different sciences) there is much higher, either because of the oxygen levels (?) and/or because of the adventurous feeling as if you are on a different planet. It seems to be also refreshing to be so far away from (the rest of human) civilization for a while. The place is even addictive, she (my colleague) is still feeling very homesick to that place.

      To be there as a winter-over (8 months, from Februari till November) is a different matter. Then there are much less people (between 50 and 70), typically the only activities are maintainance and routine data taking and you'd better not be somebody like me who gets depressed by longterm lack of sunlight. Still, winter-overs are volunteers and there are actually people taking this job for several years.

      Next winter (that is, during the austral summer) I will also go there for a 5 week stay, I am really looking forward to it. It is actually one of the reasons why I joined this experiment...

    3. Re:Gas stations? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, it's your crappy system, next time you spin off a colony get your units right first.

  11. Suckers by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    hitchhiker: hey man, you going south to Florida?

    trucker: No I'm goi... err. yeahhh.. hop in little buddy!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. Last unspoilt place on Earth by dubstop · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of a story in The Onion's 'Our Dumb Century' book. It was something along the lines of, "US military find last unspoilt place on Earth, blows it to hell."

  13. Penguin joke by Mothra+the+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    There was a penguin driving his car down a desert road.

    It was a really hot day, and his car is really a really old convertible. Up ahead he saw a small town.

    All of a sudden, his hood burst open and oil shot into the air.

    He pulled it into the first mechanic he saw in the town and cleaned himself off. The mechanic told him it could be a little while, so he waddled across the street to the ice-cream stand.

    He got a dish of vanilla ice-cream, and since he had no arms, just flippers, he had to fling it towards his mouth. Well, after he finished his ice-cream, and was covered with vanilla ice-cream, he waddled across the street back to the mechanic.

    The mechanic was looking at the engine and said, "Well, it looks like you blew a seal."

    The penguin says, "I did NOT! It's just ice-cream!"

    --
    Worst. Sig. Ever.
  14. Watch Out Chile! by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Antarctic is not owned by anyone, it is international territory, and governed by an international committee, with representatives from signatory countries. Therefore I would have to assume that before any highway is laid, this committee would have to approve it. I would say that if they're announcing the plans to do this, it's already been approved. I mean, it is a useful project. Scientists living in Antarctica currently have many problems involving not being able to get supplies and not being able to easily communicate their findings 'back home.'

    On a side note, "Both Chile and Argentina have gone to great lengths to make their claims in Antarctica part of their national territory. While there has been no recognition of these claims by any other sovereign state, both countries have great nationalistic pride in these claims. In August of 1973, an Argentine cabinet meeting was held in the area claimed by Argentina. Chile's president Pinochet spent a week in Antarctica in 1977 which caused Argentina to devise the boldest plans for claiming sovereignty. In the fall of 1978, a pregnant Argentine woman was send to live in Antarctica and in Jan. 1979, Emile Marco Palma was the first child born in Antarctica. Following the pattern in colonialism as seen in North America, Emile takes his place in history along side Virginia Dare. The Argentines followed with a wedding in Feb. 1979. Both countries have maintained colonies of civilian dependents living year round at their bases and tourism from bases both in Chile and Argentina has grown significantly in the last decades." So perhaps this means...WAR! Yes, let's fight over a piece of ice.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Watch Out Chile! by dj28 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, if you check the CIA factbook, the United States and Russia do not recognize any claim to Antarctica. However, both nations reserve the right to claim any amount of territory on the continent. So, essentially, the US and Russia hold claims on Antarctica that virtually trump all others. I also believe that 3 or 4 nations actively claim portions of Antarctica as their own territory.

    2. Re:Watch Out Chile! by October_30th · · Score: 4, Informative
      when a piece of ice melts in a glass of water, the level doesn't go up;

      If you float fresh water ice in fresh water the level won't change when the ice melts. However, try using fresh water ice and sea water. This time the water level does indeed rise.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:Watch Out Chile! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah Yes! Rush Limbaugh ... the noted scientist.

    4. Re:Watch Out Chile! by Newskyarena · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That works fine if you are talking about floating ice. Much of the ice in the world that is melting now, isn't floating, it is land based, which flows to the oceans.

      If enough of this water flows into oceanic basins, the oceanic water level is going to rise.

    5. Re:Watch Out Chile! by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Given that antartica was near the equator during
      the time of the dinasours, i'm expect there to
      by lots of oil, diamonds, coal, plus your standard
      exploited minerals in the area. Thus next century
      when the rest of the earth is mined out, Antartica
      will be a very important piece of real estate.

    6. Re:Watch Out Chile! by psych031337 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nations with territorial claims:

      Great Britain

      Argentinia

      Chile

      New Zealand

      Australia

      France

      Norway

      Nations with (temp or perm) stations:

      Argentinia

      Chile

      New Zealand

      USA

      Germany

      Italy

      France

      Australia

      R ussia

      China

      Japan

      India

      South Africa

      --
      +++ath0
  15. It's pretty necessary by Migraineman · · Score: 5, Informative

    If there's going to be a permanent presence on the South Pole, this kind of infrastructure is necessary. I worked on a satellite communications system that talked with the NOAA polar-orbit spacecraft. At the poles, you'll see the spacecraft every 90 minutes. Near the equator, you'll only see them 3 times a day for about 10-20 minutes (usable time) per. The polar research stations use the NOAA satellites as a primary communications store-and-forward service, as they can't see the geostationary satellites. Makes communicating with the research stations difficult.

    Don't go expecting an asphalt two-lane road. Calling it a "highway" is misleading. A "conditioned ice-road" is more appropriate.

  16. Um incase you were too busy to read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    'In the next few weeks the ice road should have crossed the wide expanse of the Ross ice shelf, which permanently covers the ocean, and be approaching the Transantarctic Mountains. The mountains mark the halfway point to the Pole.'

    The road is going to be ICE, not pavement. All they are doing is plowint the snow off of a section of the ice shelf.

  17. Re:this will be useful by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Informative

    how many millions (or billions) of dollars will be spent for this?

    Twelve ...as you would have known if you had RTFA. All they are doing is pushing the snow aside and flattening out the ice. No blasting, no rocks, no pavement, no paint.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  18. Additional Links And Info On This Story by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    We ran a story on this topic yesterday over on SciFi Today with quite a few additional information links. A list of ALL of our recent stories is here. You can put SciFi Today Headlines on your Slashdot frontpage by clicking here and putting a checkmark in the SciFi Today box. Check us out!!!

  19. The important points by Xibby · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since nobody seems to actually read articles:
    $12-million project
    1600 kilometres
    20 days for the inland trip
    10 days for the return to the coast (downhill!)

    (That's a staggering average speed of 3.33 KPH for the trip to the pole, 6.66 KPH for the trip to the coast)

    The traffic will consist of slow-moving convoys of caterpillar tractors, towing sleds with supplies.

    The Scott-Amundsen base is only currently accessible by air, which places limits on cargo and relies on good weather. The road could be open to heavy traffic for up to 100 days a year during the austral summer.

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
  20. It's safe by siskbc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Except for maybe the outer few miles, it's completely safe. The earth won't warm that much, and the shelf will only melt at the edges (where it's within a degree or so of 0C now). Within, there's about no chance. The ice in that shelf is *incredibly* old - that's why they take ice cores from it to get a picture of the atmosphere tens of thousande of years ago.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  21. RTFA, RTFA, RTFA by andyring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    C'mon, people, it's NOT THAT HARD to click on a link and read for a few minutes. This is not a "road" as we understand them. Basically, they will clear a path on the ice so it is free from snow and debris, and fill in any crevices, etc., with (presumably) ice, etc. As some have suggested, no, the road will not be dug down and laid on terra ferma. They would have to dig hundreds of feet to do that. Basically, they'll take big bulldozers and clear the way for large caterpillar-type vehicles to carry fuel and supplies. Now, everything must be brought in by air, and that's gotta be expensive!

    1. Re:RTFA, RTFA, RTFA by mgs1000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So will they send out Zambonis to "resurface" the road?

  22. RTFA by squibix · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the first line of the second paragraph you would have noticed that the highway is described as an 'ice road' over 'the Ross ice shelf, which permanently covers the ocean.' A bit later, we read:
    Construction of the ice road involves clearing the route of snow, bulldozing rough ice and filling in crevasses. The route will cross the Leverett glacier in the Transantarctic Mountains. ...
    The road will need to be cleared of snow and checked for crevasses and ice movement each spring, says Karl Erb of the National Science Foundation in Virginia, which is funding the $12-million project. "But crevices don't change much from year to year," he says. "We will just have to monitor them."
    Also, it's my understanding that the biggest problem with a road in Antarctica wouldn't be melting, but the continual accumulation of snow. That's what buried the old dome and forced the creation of a new research station a couple years ago. It may be, though, that melting is an issue on the ice shelf, if not over the continent itself.
  23. Reading the article helps... by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It pretty clearly states that the road is to be built over ice, and that one of the major issues is going to be verifying that no crevasses, ice shifts, etc, have occurred. Since the Antarctic continent is buried in ice sheets that are kilometers thick, clearing away the ice doesn't seem like a practical option. Sean

  24. Re:this will be useful by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Informative
    Did you read the article at all?

    Construction of the ice road involves clearing the route of snow, bulldozing rough ice and filling in crevasses. The route will cross the Leverett glacier in the Transantarctic Mountains.
    ...
    The road will need to be cleared of snow and checked for crevasses and ice movement each spring, says Karl Erb of the National Science Foundation in Virginia, which is funding the $12-million project. "But crevices don't change much from year to year," he says. "We will just have to monitor them."


    It's going to cost $12 million for a 1600km back-country road. It's not a high speed 6 lane super highway. No asphalt. No lines. It's a compressed snow/ice road that they are smoothing out and filling in crevices.

    While I have not ever gone to the south pole, pictures I've seen indicate that it is pretty much frozen year round. I don't think that they are going to have to worry a whole lot about melting ice/snow in the imediate future.

    The National Science Foundation is funding the entire road project...not the US Government directly. Yes the NSF is funded by the government, but I'd imagine that it has a regular line-item entry on the fiscal budget each year so it really isn't anything extra. I'd rather they build this road then have any polition go on a "fact-finding" junket.

    Also, the road is justified. They are starting research at the south pole (Ice Cube Project) that requires heavy equipment to be brought in. Currently the only way to get their is by air, which places limits on the weight of cargo and they have to have clear skies. This road will help with both of those limitations.
  25. Re:Antarctic natural resources? by privacyt · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to this, from a website geared toward students, Antarctica has the following natural resources:
    - Ice(!). Yes indeed, in many part of the world, fresh water is so rare that it's now a valued commodity.
    - Coal.
    - Petroleum. Antarctica has never been explored for oil, but it's assumed that where there's coal, there might also be oil.
    - Metallic minerals such as cobalt, chromium, nickel, vanadium, copper, iron, uranium, lead and platinum.

    The main problem thusfar has been that despite Antarctica's mineral weath, it's been too expensive to mine those minerals. But a road to the South Pole would make it much more economical to explore for and exploit the resources.

  26. Important Geek News element missing from story by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Informative

    The slashdot summary is oddly misleading, I think there would be a lot fewer 'wasted tax dollars' complaints if it was written this way round:

    Plane for One Kilometer Cube Neutrino Telescope Goes Ahead
    IceCube is a one-cubic-kilometer international high-energy neutrino observatory, located deep under the ice at the south pole, where the effects of the eath's magnetic fields will inferfere less with the observations.

    Because the cost of flying all the necessary materials in by air is prohibitive, $12m of the $204m budget will be spent on pushing some ice out of the way so that the components can travel overland.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  27. Sounds like an X-Files thing by westfirst · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do you be that there's something terribly secret down there that needs $250 million to develop. These weird "scientific explorations" are often just fascades for weird political operations. The Glomar Challenger, after all, was searching for Russian subs not manganese nodules or whatever the cover story said.

    1. Re:Sounds like an X-Files thing by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that was the Glomar Explorer, Challenger's sister ship. And, proving that there is life after notoriety, both are now involved in deep-sea oil exploration..

  28. This is great for Linux! by bailout911 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now penguins can post to slashdot, but will we notice the difference?

    --
    --Stupid Sig Here--
  29. This good be good by Moloch666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see this as being a good thing. For one I don't think this will lead to some kind of tourist attraction adding a bunch of vehicles and pollution. This is Antarctica we're talking about, nothing to see. The south pole is home to my interesting scientific experiments, whether it be astronomy related since the view into space from there I would imagine to be much clearer of radio signals and terrestrial light. They mentioned studying neutrinos and what little I know of this area, terrestrial radio noise plays a factor.

    It's not like they are going to be building a 6 lane highway. Probably won't be much than a gravel back road.

    --
    Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  30. Re:Yee Haw! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pristine?

    What is pristine and holy about crapholes like an antartic ice plain or mosquito filled Alaska bogs?

    Why isn't anyone complaining about Egyptian expansion into the Sahara and destruction of the pristine desert? Why hasn't anyone taken Iraq to task for the destruction of the swamps around Basra?

  31. And on a related note: by vought · · Score: 2, Funny
    The Antarctic City Council has just announced that Segway personal transporters will be banned from using the new road.

    Film at 11.

  32. Of course it's the US by asscroft · · Score: 2, Funny

    PAVE THE PLANET

    Fucking bullshit. You call this progress?

    Somedays I'm ashamed to be human.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  33. Roadside features? by LAI · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, and how long until the first Starbucks shows up on the transantarctic?

    "Okay, I'll have an iced cappuccino, an iced tea and an iced iced mocha..."

    --
    :eof
  34. This is about research, nothing else by NullProg · · Score: 5, Informative

    Antarctica is jointly managed by several countries. The purpose of this "road" is to move scientific equipment to the research station that cannot be moved by C-130. See the below links, we are building a telescope.

    The cost of any commercial interest in antartica would far exceed the gain. Why on earth would the USA dig for coal, minerals, etc. at the south pole when we can get it cheaper elsewhere?

    See:
    http://www.wisconline.com/UWMadisonNews/IceCube.ht ml
    or
    http://icecube.wisc.edu/

    Brought to you by the following countries:
    USA, Belgium, Germany, Japan, Sweden.

    Flame if you must,
    Enjoy.

    --
    It's just the normal noises in here.
  35. Re:But which side to drive on? by XenonOfArcticus · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was there (McMurdo) in '94/'95, the convention was to drive the 'American' way. Scott Base, a New Zealand facility, is right next to McMurdo, and shares a lot of its infrastructure: airstrips, ship docks, etc. I expect the American convention won out because the American station has a lot more vehicles than the Kiwis.

    I am curious about how they're going to lay fiber over the ice, and keep it intact. The ice does shift, and the conditions (wind and cold) are brutal.

    Currently all comms traffic leaves McMurdo for the unmanned earth station at Black Island, just to the southwest. (Black Island can see geosync birds over Mt Erebus, Erebus obscures the view from McMurdo itself.) The traffic to BI (telephony and data/internet) goes over a microwave link. When I was there we did helo and GPS surveys with NASA of areas closer to MacTown to try to find a place to build an earthstation that could be linked by fiber, for greater bandwidth. No one had yet figured out how to keep fiber alive atop shifting ice in those conditions.

    --
    -- There is no truth. There is only Perception. To Percieve is to Exist.
  36. More Development, More People, More Trash... by Modern+Hamlet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Given that there are very strict rules for handling human impact in Antarctica, isn't this road, which will draw even more tourists and researchers, cause a real logistical nightmare? It's hard enough to haul the trash generated from shore, but if you start carrying truckloads of junk to the pole itself... you have to truck it out too. That's the trash collection job to end all trash collection jobs. From the McMurdo Station website for incoming Antarctic visitors:

    WASTE MANAGEMENT
    In 1990, McMurdo Station developed and implemented its first formal recycling program. Since then, Waste Management has continuously upgraded the program to maximize recycling efforts. During the 1993-94 season, the USAP recycled 70% of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. The program stands as a model for other communities and is a point of pride for the USAP community.

    Except for human waste, all waste generated by the USAP is removed from Antarctica and returned to the United States for disposal. Because of strict Federal and State regulations on this process, it is crucial that waste be handled effectively.

    The key to McMurdo's recycling program is careful source segregation: as careless separation of waste in McMurdo can result in material being unfit for recycling, it is everyone's responsibility to separate waste effectively. You will be briefed on the details of McMurdo's recycling program. Please be sure you gain a thorough understanding of your part in the recycling process; make sure your questions are answered. With a little practice, you'll find the separation of waste materials into a myriad of containers will become second nature--a process you expect to continue when you return to the world.

  37. snow in Antarctica by squibix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Antarctica is actually a desert, with little annual accumulation.

    That's certainly true of the South Pole area itself, but from what I've read the edges of the continent get more than their fair share of snow. Reading the account of the Ross Sea party in Shackleton's book it certainly seemed like it snows there all the time!

    But you're right, I find, that the problem at the South Pole station isn't new snow falling; it's the drifts of existing snow that buried the dome.

  38. But then it's stupid... by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The WHOLE POINT of putting a scientific base in the south pole is to access data you only find in remote places that are not affected by human activity (fresh ice that "keeps samples" of the earth's atmosphere in the air bubbles, etc etc). So if they start to trash the south pole with a road, heavy machinery (diesel engines) to build it and more supplies for the scientists to consume, then the whole point of the camp disappears. Otherwise, well, they'd just have set it up in New Jersey or something... But well; I guess they have a point with this fiber-optic internet connection stuff there: more porn for those solitary, frustrated south-pole-scientists! Yay!

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  39. Knee-jerk environmentalism, anyone? by Richard+Mills · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know, if you had actually bothered to read the article, you'd see that they're not so much building what we would think of as a "road", just flattening out some ice, filling some crevasses, etc. The environmental impact of this is nil... even environmentalist groups familiar with the plan think so.

    Of course, I really can't blame you, given the ridiculous headline about a "highway" being constructed.