Slashdot Mirror


Linux In Space: Red Hat Rides The Rocket

neiljt writes "BBC News have a piece on NASA experiments to use IP for space missions. The article is a little low-tech, but more details available from NASA (OMNI). Is this the first Red Hat in space?" It's worth pointing out as well that Debian made the ride nearly six years ago. Still, great news.

138 comments

  1. great... by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...but the shuttle won't crash if it's DDoSed will it? :P

  2. debian extends unbeaten run film at 10 by sparkes · · Score: 1

    As usual debian beats the nasdeq boys.

    1. Re:debian extends unbeaten run film at 10 by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      I don't have the source, but I thought I remember reading NetBSD was used in space for some of the specialized computer systems. Something about how NetBSD could be ported to most anything and being very robust too. I'm sure this was for the odd ball computer systems with home brew processors and the like, but I thought it was interesting and put NetBSD in really good light for fast prototyping systems.

    2. Re:debian extends unbeaten run film at 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I don't have the source

      Of course you do! It's under the BSD license.

  3. Uh oh.... by mistermund · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The project will allow mission scientists to use a standard web browser to monitor spacecraft and to swap data with them or their crew."

    So what happens when 7337 HaXorz find the conveniently unsercured web interface which lets them control the shuttle robot arm?

    1. Re:Uh oh.... by cavver · · Score: 1

      Nah , i expect NASA to be very careful about security . I think that the ideea is more like a "space intranet" used only by authorized people .

    2. Re:Uh oh.... by rusty+spoon · · Score: 1, Funny

      They will rename it the "Reboot arm" of course.

    3. Re:Uh oh.... by giel · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll give NASA the 'finger'.

      --
      giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    4. Re:Uh oh.... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Monitoring !=remote control. I don't expect NASA to abandon their established standards for the Shuttle control programs (what was it, zero bugs in the last few releases?), but this would be useful to cheaply link earthbound scientists to their orbiting experiments (think Webcams).

    5. Re:Uh oh.... by baryon351 · · Score: 1

      If they're the typical prepubescent teen h4>0r, they'll make it give rude gestures or masturbate over afghanistan or something.

    6. Re:Uh oh.... by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

      define "standard web browse" anyways. I have used lots of web browsers none of them seem to hold any standard...

    7. Re:Uh oh.... by pr0t3uS · · Score: 1
      So what happens when 7337 HaXorz find the conveniently unsercured web interface which lets them control the shuttle robot arm?


      OMG a tit haxor!
      Now we know why the access to those 7337 buttons is restricted: they control the robots arm.
    8. Re:Uh oh.... by Peartree · · Score: 1

      damn that would be coolz

  4. Re:virus by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 0

    that was my first thought, but jokes about the Challenger are a bit... tasteless.

  5. hmmm by pummer · · Score: 0, Funny

    one thing's for sure. It's much better than the 1970's computers running NASA's systems now.

    1. Re:hmmm by bjb · · Score: 2, Insightful
      one thing's for sure. It's much better than the 1970's computers running NASA's systems now.

      Are you so sure about that? One thing that I can say about "70's computing" is that due to the limitations of the hardware they had at the time, the code is much smaller, much more thought over/looked over, and therefore has a propensity to contain far fewer bugs.

      It's like saying that we're better off using Excel 2003 than VisiCalc 1979, even though they both do the same basic job.

      I could see how there are cases where you need the extra computing power or speed for certain jobs, and maybe thats all they're doing here?

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    2. Re:hmmm by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      "Better" how, exactly? I just don't recall hearing a lot of complaints about computer malfunctions on the shuttles... I could be wrong, but I don't think there's been one for quite a while.

    3. Re:hmmm by tijnbraun · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm...

      Voyager 1 --- Launch Date:September 5, 1977

      Last time I heard it's computer is still running... Tell me ... what's *your* uptime? ;)

  6. FlightLinux Project at NASA by jim.b0b · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems NASA had a Flight Linux project that ended in June 2002. Interestingly enough, they link back to slashdot in their publications listing.

  7. leet hax0rs bla bla bla by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 0, Funny

    insert half-arsed joke about script-kiddies hacking the space shuttle here in accordance with slashdot standard lameness protocol.

    And some of these drones are actually going to get modded +5 funny. *sigh*

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  8. NASA...cutting edge?? by CodePyro · · Score: 1

    "To test the technology the Columbia space shuttle was fitted with an embedded PC that has a 233 MHz processor, 128 MB of RAM and a solid-state 144 MB hard drive. " I remember when nase used to be the technology leader...people used to brag about how this product came from nasa...what happened...budget cut backs must be really hurting them if they're sending that computer to space...my dell x5 with 512 mb compact flash can outperform NASA equipment....man i'd love to goto nasa and brag to them about my pda...

    1. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Lurch+Kimded · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I am sure you know, the only reason NASA ever use "older" tech is because they know the bugs in those systems, they know what can go wrong and therefore can work aroudn it. Dependability and reliablity is more important than the MHz or RAM. So quite why they are using anything to do with teh Net is beyond me, could you imagine it... "Houston, we have a problem... we can't get Pron, could you check the connetcion please!"

      --

      How can you say that civilisation's do not advance... in every war we invent new ways to kill you.

    2. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by hcdejong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have good reason not to use bleeding-edge technology, similar to the military still using 486 and early Pentium processors in things like the F-22.

      The electronics are probably radiation-hardened, and tested up the wazoo (if not mathematically proven correct) before being allowed in the Shuttle. This is what makes the space program so expensive.

      And Nasa isn't the 'bureau of trailblazing technology'. They used to be, because the things they did weren't possible with then-current technology. Today, you don't need to 'invent the wheel' to go into space anymore, it's been done.

    3. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lets see how well your 733T PDA works in a space enviroment after its been hit with a few cosmic rays. Idiot.

    4. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Hellkitten · · Score: 3, Informative

      budget cut backs must be really hurting them if they're sending that computer to space

      So what makes you think they didn't consider faster processors?

      For all you (and I) know NASA could have performed tests indicating that modern 3Ghz prosessors are more prone to bit errors caused by radiation in space than older processors.

      The difference in cost between a fast prosessor and a 233Mhz on isn't likely to affect the budget of a space shuttle launch, (hell, the 233 may be a custom job and cost more for all we know) so I expect that when nasa engineers went for the slower one they had a damn good reason

      Besides the computer is supposed to be used for transferring data back to NASA, how much processor do you need for that? It's not like they'll be recompiling their kernel a lot in orbit is there?

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    5. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      Oh, bugger off. It's a tool designed to do a job, which is not to be flashy, or out-perform your frickin' PDA. Has your PDA been tested in a vacuum? extremes of heat and cold? shock, vibration? radiation? had x thousand hours of burn testing? have a power draw of less than x milliamps? Think, for godsake, think.

    6. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I worked for NASA as a contractor on an engine test stand, we had a fast track "proof of concept" project to replace the Space Shuttle Main Engine control computer with "modern technology". Seems that some ambitious young engineer had caught the attention of management and crusaded to bring this particular component "out of the dark ages", so he rolled up his controller code and did the engine interface with a laptop, this primarily to rub in the notion that this could be done with off-the-shelf hardware. The thing had a beautiful graphical interface too. The engine started up just fine, but when he tried to throttle up we had a wonderfully spectacular explosion and fire. It seems that his control algorithm didn't bother to implement all of the safeguards that were a part of the hardware of the "antiquated" control computer.

      The best part was watching the "old hands" on the test stand shaking their heads at the fundamental errors this "new technology" had introduced. Many of these guys had worked with Werner Von Braun himself and had already learned (from their mistakes) not to do what the fancy new controller was doing. That knowledge has been embedded in those old controllers. A reimplementation on more modern hardware is a fine idea, but one must understand completely what works. IMHO, once you invest the study to understand the working system you come away thinking it's not so bad after all...

    7. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by gte910h · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nasa uses 2/386's because radiation effects these chips wider transistor paths MUCH less than the current 2.4 GHZ models. There are several orders of magnitudes difference in the size of those internal chip traces. The smaller the path, the more solar radiation affects it.

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    8. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually NASA (or JPL, I always get them confused) is going to start using Transmeta processors pretty soon, I am not a hardware guy so I do not know why transmeta would be a good coice. Linus Torvalds got his picture taken with one of the Transmeta CPU's that are going in the shittle. There is a link to that picture here.

    9. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by owenomalley · · Score: 1

      They do use very slow computers in flight. They need to. The error rates, which are caused by solar radiation, are high enough with the slow stuff and get much worse as the feature size decreases on the chips. There are some spots over the earth (south Atlantic, I believe), where they need to reboot all of the PC's after they clear the area, because the earth's radiation shield isn't as effective there.

      Most satellites, especially if they are in higher orbits than the shuttle's use very slow/old processors. There are satellites being launched right now by both government and non-government organizations that have chips like the mil-spec 1750A where they measure clocks in single and double digit megahertz and memory in kilobytes. There are some very smart people writing that code...

      I've also actually held the 30 pound laptops that they use on the shuttle. (I work for NASA. *grin*) On Earth, they are pretty unwieldy, but of course in 0 gravity having a lot of mass is a good thing to increase stability.

    10. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Because it works. 233's have been around for almost 10 years now and are a proven technology. You don't trust multi-billion dollar spacecraft to brand new components. Anyway, for what they are using it for a P233 with 128Mb is actually a little overpowered.

      Please bear in mind that the computers that control the shuttle use technology from the 70's and 80's.

    11. Re:NASA...cutting edge?? by IXI · · Score: 1

      Linus Torvalds got his picture taken with one of the Transmeta CPU's that are going in the shittle.

      I suppose, the shittle is the spacecraft they use to drain the faeces from the ISS?

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
  9. Re:Bad news for Linux? by jeepliberty · · Score: 1
    JFK's Depression Era work programs.

    I think you mean FDR. The depression was after the 1929 crash. FDR became president in 1933.

    I have parents that tell me this all the time. (Along with how they walked to school in the snow uphill...both ways!)

  10. First personal OS in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be good if we could find that Windows machines hadn't yet made it to space. I know orbital missions need ultra-reliability so I wouldn't be surprised if Windows hadn''t yet made it, and with OSX so new and the previous MacOS so unreliable I doubt it's had a shoe-in yet.

    Linux - the first consumer OS in space. That would make me smile!

    1. Re:First personal OS in space? by codegen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in the early 90s Nasa flew the Macintosh Portable (a bulky 13lb pre powerbook brute) on the shuttle. I remember that one of the more humourous issues dealt with the macs power eject of floppy disks. In Earth's gravity, the floppy catches on the edge of drive, so that it stops partway out. In space, when the floppy was unmounted, it flew accross the compartment.

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  11. Govt favors MS products while NASA favors Linux? by Kethinov · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The United States government favors Microsoft products while NASA favors Linux? Hah. Which organization would you trust your tax dollars with more?

    --
    You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  12. Redhat and PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Redhat Linux... Extreme computing that's out of this world!

  13. no this was the first red hat in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read all about it here

  14. Re:Bad news for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..but the folks that are laid off might find it a sour grape to swallow.

    I'm pretty sure that they don't just kick these guys on the street. They'll probably be assigned to some more interesting projects than doing the ping with the spacecraft. It's a win-win for all!

  15. (OT) whoa thirty comments and all of them trolls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a great start!

    What's with the slashdot response to nasa articles anyway?

  16. IP by Dibblah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK. Can we get this straight, please? IP!=Internet. There are these little things on the internet called routers. They allow traffic to pass between things called 'networks'. A router on a network is an OPTIONAL thing. Without a router connected to to The Internet(tm), THERE AIN'T NOBODY GETTING IN. Moving to standard IP is a _good_ thing. It allows them to use 'standard' tools. Rather than writing everything from scratch. I wouldn't even think that they'll be implementing this in 'mission critical systems' until after it's been tested for a _long_ time. Sheesh. I know hackers and script kiddies are an irritant, but NASA ain't all that stupid.

    1. Re:IP by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      But there is the small matter of the link between Shuttle and earth being wireless, and thus easy to hack. Easier now than ever, thanks to using IP instead of a weirdass NASA-only protocol you'd have to reverse-engineer before being able to break in.

    2. Re:IP by Queuetue · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else suspect that slashdot is completely populated by characters from the simpsons?

      Worst Internet definition ... Ever!

    3. Re:IP by Roofus · · Score: 1

      Well that's true, unless the IP is encapsulated in some other NASA protocol. This could be useful by letting various shuttle devices talk plain old IP, while a shuttle computer encapsulates it into another transport medium. Think something like a wireless DOCSIS.

    4. Re:IP by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else suspect that slashdot is completely populated by characters from the simpsons?

      Not likely. There would be many copyright issues.

      More likely is that simpsons characters are made to mimic characters from slashdot. This could be done with a very low chance of raising any legal issues.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  17. Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the case of Debian, it was simply controlling an experiment in the shuttle, whereas now it's being tested as part of the communications system for the ship itself.

    BTW, that astronaut lady looks cute. Too bad they couldn't get a better picture of her.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by benwb · · Score: 1, Funny

      http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/clark.html

    2. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a moron. It's obvious that you have no idea about what you're talking about. Why don't you spend a little time researching before you spout out such drivel?

      It's people like you which make fear for the fate of humanity.

    3. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, that astronaut lady looks cute. Too bad they couldn't get a better picture of her.

      http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/portraits/clark.jpg

    4. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

      That's no astronaut lady, that's my wife!

      Thank you!

      --
      Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    6. Re:Isn't this a new first for Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You slashdotted her. Nice job.

  18. Red Hat rides the rocket? by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    What is this, Quake?

    1. Re:Red Hat rides the rocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you have to be a flaming pile of chickenshit to mod somebody overrated down from 1.

  19. Re:virus by leviramsey · · Score: 0
    jokes about the Challenger are a bit... tasteless.

    What's the difference between the CIA (Culinary Institute of America) and NASA?

    CIA teaches cooks and NASA cooks teachers!

    What's NASA's favorite soda?

    7-Up.

  20. Space Certification? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Linux needs a 'certified for use in outerspace' logo. I'd slap one of those on my redhat box.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  21. Windows 98 by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    also was launched into space (or near?), even by linux fans. Sky is not as far as it used to be.

    1. Re:Windows 98 by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Windows 98 also was launched [svlug.org] into space"

      Too bad they can't launch all the other copies too...

  22. A first! A genuinely funny comment to this thread! by Burb · · Score: 0

    Mods mark parent FUNNY!

    --

  23. VOIP in space = not new by forged · · Score: 2, Informative
    The article talks about IP in general, and of course it makes sense. I'd like to remaind us that VOIP to be more specific, was already featured last year ! They flew IP-telephony software from Cisco to the ISS and tried calling home with great success. IP makes adding voice to data (or the other way round however you want to see it) a reality.

    and contrary to analog radio transmission which are prone to interferences and background noise/hiss, VOIP actually makes a lot of sense in space. All it requires is a data channel with limited bandwidth (64kbits is plentiful) but short delay, and the voice quality is just as good as with a regular phone call.

    Maybe NASA saw in IP a cheaper alternative for astronauts to get pr0n than having to fly (heavier) tabloid magazines to space? :->

  24. what is the spaceshuttle's IP address? by smd4985 · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'd love to see the traceroute output on that one ;).

    --
    smd4985
    1. Re:what is the spaceshuttle's IP address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would that look any different?

      if you saw a traceroute with the ip address
      121.12.31.51 would you know that was a million miles away on the moon or in space or whatever ?

      the dns entry would just probably show some arse about face name, i doubt an nslookup would show

      international_space_station.nasa.gov now would it ? (would it!?) ha ha

    2. Re:what is the spaceshuttle's IP address? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me be the first to say "HA" to you.

      These sites need to add declination and ascension if they wish to keep up with technology!

      http://www.geobytes.com/iplocator.htm
      http://ww w.networldmap.com/TryIt.htm
      http://www.maxmind.co m/app/standard
      http://www.acmebw.com/askmrdns/arc hive.php?categor y=81&question=20

  25. Ride the rocket by MongooseCN · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Redhat rides NASAs Rocket"
    "Debian eats NASAs pineapple"
    "Mandrake tries to put the pin back in."

  26. Hope they're using by caluml · · Score: 1

    Hope they're using the version of RedHat that will be supported after 31st Dec 2003...

    Seriously, it'd be neat. ./sat-hack ip.of.sat.ellite
    Sending overflow....
    root@satellite# ping www.google.com
    PING www.google.com (216.239.53.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from www.google.com (216.239.53.101): icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=5173 ms
    64 bytes from www.google.com (216.239.53.101): icmp_seq=2 ttl=41 time=3111 ms
    64 bytes from www.google.com (216.239.53.101): icmp_seq=3 ttl=41 time=4831 ms
    64 bytes from www.google.com (216.239.53.101): icmp_seq=4 ttl=41 time=4251 ms

    --- www.google.com ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 4012ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 3111/5173/4622/2722.195 ms

    What happens when the satellite goes round the other side of the world though? Dropped packets? :o)

  27. Re:Bad news for Linux? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Why would this be bad for Linux?

    And why should the government pay to keep people working in jobs that have become obsolete, when the same people could do useful work elsewhere? It's not as if a Nasa engineer will be out of a job for long.

  28. Orbital Mesh network by kinnell · · Score: 1

    They could take all the recently obsolete PCs in the world, strap on solar panels and an antenna made from an old whisky tin with gaffer tape, install linux, mesh software and a wifi card, and send them into random orbits with a giant steam catapult. Problem solved. Then they could spend their budget on new spaceships, so the rest of us could go up and play.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Orbital Mesh network by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Already being done, sort of. Although the launch doesn't seem to have occurred yet.

  29. Failed experiment by gmuslera · · Score: 1, Funny

    all the ip packets they got were discarded by the firewall as martian.

  30. Great! by caldroun · · Score: 1

    Are they admining the Satelites with Webmin now?

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  31. 69th post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my Girlfriend rides the rocket o_O

  32. Re:Govt favors MS products while NASA favors Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA admins favor MS products. As a matter of fact, there was a memorandum issued by NASA director Dias at Goddard that was to consider switching all the email protocols based on MS servers...get this...for a better security reason.

    NASA scientists and system admins, on the other hand, profusely demonstrated against the move. Not many scientists in the same mind uses MS for number crunching, etc. Most of them use either Solaris or linux (predominantly RedHat for better support, blah blah). I would pick debian over RH any day though.

  33. Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worth pointing out as well that Debian made the ride nearly six years ago. Still, great news.

    Isn't that the same version that is in stable now?

  34. Re:virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you hear about the hockey game at the leper colony?
    There was a face off in the corner.

  35. Debian Made the Ride... by Roofus · · Score: 1

    Ok, I read that little attached blurb, and I'm a little curious about all the references to "Debian GNU/Linux". That article was dated April 1, 1997. Was Bruce Perens and the gang using the phrase GNU/Linux back in 1997, or is this some revisionist history?

    1. Re:Debian Made the Ride... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      I think I was. RMS had asked me to do that while I was still Debian project leader.

      Bruce

  36. Ah, good progress by Xpilot · · Score: 1

    First Linux on one space shuttle. Then on all of them. Who knows, one day Linux may power all space vehicles. Maybe perhaps it will even be installed on FTL starship computers someday. When that day comes, we can finally say that... Linux is ready for the Enterprise.

    * ducks *

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Ah, good progress by wawadave · · Score: 1

      hello was linux use on the space shuttle that went nova over texas?

  37. Windows launch was scrubbed by dudemaster · · Score: 1

    Rumor has it Windows 98 was originally slated for launch but NASA officials feared too many Shuttle repair missions to reboot the derned thing.

  38. Red Rocket? by DrZaius · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who things that "Red Rocket, Red Rocket!" would have been a better title for this posting?

    That's all.

    --
    -- DrZaius - Minister of Sciences and Protector of the Faith
    1. Re:Red Rocket? by Red+Rocket · · Score: 0


      I do. But, then again, I'm a little biased.

      --
      - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
    2. Re:Red Rocket? by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Nobody gave a rating to this comment except for one person who considered it "overrated". How can something that's not rated be overrated? It seems like a waste of a mod point to mod down a silly little off-the-cuff remark like this, anyway.
      Why don't you put me on your "foes" list if you just don't like me, coward? You must really have no life if you just troll /. searching for your foes posts and modding them down.
      See you in Meta.

      --
      - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  39. Easy to Hack?! by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you have a few billion dollars burning a hole in your pocket. The normal link between the Shuttle and the ground is through the TDRS (Tracking and Data Relay System) satellite network. This is a set of satellites in geosynchronous orbit that relay data between NASA spacecraft and the WSGT (White Sands Ground Terminal) in New Mexico. This is not something that you are going to emulate with a Pringles can and some surplus microwave equipment.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  40. Red blah blah blah Rocket by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


    Was this post meant just for me?
    Thanks guys. You really shouldn't have.

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  41. Reliability, power consumption, and heat by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There are other things to worry about than speed. Is it Alpha-hardened? Can it consume as few watts as possible? Can the components survive the G-forces and shocks of flight?

    One might consider the task of engineering current technology to withstand difficult environments to be just as hi-tech and valid as merely getting the most Ghz out of a chip.

  42. Interplanetary Internet by YearOfTheDragon · · Score: 1
    --
    -= If you fight Dragons long enough, you will become a Dragon =-
  43. more sick jokes by jedie · · Score: 1
    A leper walks into a bar and orders a drink. The bartender serves him, and then promptly throws up. The leper says, "Hey, look, if you're grossed out by me, just say so and I'll leave." and the bartender says, "No, it's not you, trust me." The leper orders a second drink, drinks it, and the bartender throws up again. The leper says, "Hey, I told you, I won't get offended, if it's me, just say so." and the bartender promises that it's not. After the leper's third drink, the bartender throws up a third time and the leper says, "All right, if it's not me making you throw up, then what is it?" and the bartender says, "It's not you, it's the guy behind you dipping his nachos into your back."
    ---------------

    A guy goes to the pub, and says to his friend "You won't believe what happened. I was taking a short cut along the railway track, and I found a girl tied to it. I untied her, and then we had sex over and over again, all the positions, everything.
    His friend replies, "That's great: did you get a blow job?"
    "Oh, no: I never found her head."
    -----------

    Q: What's better than winning 4 gold medals in the special olympics?
    A: not being RETARDED.
    -----------

    Billy and Jimmy come running down the stairs Christmas Morning. They race past the kitchen, where their mother is cooking up a delicious breakfast. Out the window they can see a perfect blanket of snow gently falling to the ground. Running to the living room, they are greeted by their father, who is stoking up a roaring fire. Then they see the tree, laden with gifts that spread across the floor. The paper starts flying. When the dust has settled, Billy has a huge mound of presents: G.I. Joe action figures, Nerf guns, a Playstation, and tons of candy. Then he looks over at Jimmy, who has recieved ONE MATCHBOX CAR and is pushing it back and forth across the floor in the corner.

    "Gosh," says Billy, "I got a lot more presents than you did this year."

    "Yeah," replies Jimmy, "well, at least I don't have cancer."
    ----------------

    hehe, sick jokes are so funny

    --
    "The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
    http://slashdot.jp
  44. A couple of humorous notes about the article. by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 1

    So, in essence, we will be seeing an article in the future on how someone hacked into the Shuttle (Just like the Mars Lander was) and was telling the shuttle to do some (driving) donuts in space?

    Also, if the shuttle network goes down? How can they get e-mail support from the volunteer Linux Czars?

    Dolemite

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  45. Propagation Delays with IP in space? by jvj1 · · Score: 1

    Here is a good FAQ about IP in space is available here. It says "This is a misconception that is brought about by confusing IP, a layer 3 network protocol, with TCP, a layer 4 transport protocol."

  46. British Spelling by JeffHunt · · Score: 1
    I just think it's cute how the BBC called it the "Goddard Space Flight CentRE" instead of the "Goddard Space Flight CentER". Those silly Brits.

    Or perhaps we have been invaded by the British. The way things are going in the USA now, I can only hope...

    --

    "It was hell!" recalls former child.

  47. ubiquitous 'my favorite OS was in space, too' post by jschauma · · Score: 1
    --

    -- "Tradition is the illusion of permanence."
  48. Red Hat in space? Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think NASA can afford the $1000/node licensing that IBM^H^H^RedHat extorts?

  49. Much funnier than the haxor comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your quip.

  50. I may never fly through space by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1
    But my code has and that makes me feel pretty damn good.

    I'd still love to go up but if this is as close as I get then I can be happy.

  51. Be thankful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Debian is there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here is the proof.

    From the DWN (January 21st):
    [...]
    Debian older than Humanity? Tomas Pospisek reported that the Debian Swirl can be cleary seen on one of the pictures taken by NASA's orbiting Hubble Space Telescope. For example, check the lower right hand corner of the image. Perhaps this is proof that the seeds for Debian were sowed long before the dawn of humanity.
    [...]


    fRinK

  53. Good For Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ride the pig gir."

  54. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radiation hardening is the serious issue.

    "Alpha" hardening is not. :)

    Alpha particles can be stopped by a piece of paper. All you have to do is put your computer in a brown paper bag and it will be safe from alpha particles. :)

    What you need to worry about are cosmic rays... they flip bits routinely in space electronics. (And, if you close your eyes in space, you will see little flashes of light due to cosmic ray hits in your eyes and maybe in your nervous system.)

  55. Just shows.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That using Linux is really Rocket Science !

  56. IP makes good sense by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    Buying comm equipment that uses some "weirdass nasa protocol" is extra super expensive... besides they want different spacecraft to be able to relay data, especially at Mars. With IP a NASA rover can relay data to an ESA spacecraft and the ESA spacecraft can relay the data back to Earth.

    The actual commands sent to spacecraft are still some weirdass NASA-only command set, and everything's encrypted, and you need to drop down a few hundred million for a tracking station to even have a shot at 'hacking' a spacecraft.... so I don't think this stuff is easy to hack.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  57. one more argument by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    as i try to implement F/OSS solutions when people ask, "what is this linux thing?", all i have to say is it is used by nasa in space in mission critical operations. "did they use windows?". yeah, the astronauts get bored and need their solitaire.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  58. "Red Hat Rides The Rocket" ??? by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    Here's a nice addition to the "Linux Gay Conspiracy" troll if there ever was one!

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  59. Linux in wide use on the ground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Genesis uses Redhat for all of its ground support computers... and used Linux for the mission design... Cassini is about to switch to Linux for the spacecraft navigation. Redhat is very literally used in mission critical applications. Windows machines aren't even allowed on the same network.

  60. Space & computer equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work on a satellite project. New processors don't have the history to justify their use. Nothing gets used in space without a boatload of documentation on past performance.

    One of the best chips to use in space is the 386. The manufacuring process makes it naturally radiation resistant to enormous levels.

    Remember, Voyager was launched with 64K of memory. It is still providing useful data today.

  61. NASA's IT Favor by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


    The United States government favors Microsoft products while NASA favors Linux?


    Don't be too quick to paint with that broad brush.

    NASA is a large and somewhat disparate organization. Especially when it comes to IT resources. There are large-scale official directions and policies for a NASA Center's IT (and with One NASA - perhapse the entire organization) that may or may not hold true when it comes to individual Divisions or projects.

    For example, Johnson Space Center (JSC) has been a pretty solid Microsoft shop over the past several years. Much of this was spearheaded by JSC's former CIO, Jack Garman who set an aggressively pro-Microsoft policy. The policy was so aggressive, that it lead to the infamous "Mac Attack" jihad at JSC - eventually leading to a Congressional inquiry. Yet JSC is not all-Microsoft.

    JSC has a variety of IT resources in its environment. JSC's datacenter is chock full of hardware running various flavors of Unix. Many engineering environments include Unix workstations / labs to churn the various modeling and CAD applications needed (although this is another common battlefield between Unix and WinNT/2K). Macs are still around - and somewhat more common than during the old Jihad days. Linux pops up more and more often with "Linux compatability" becoming more a concern for IT architects.

    So does NASA favor Linux? No. Not in a policy sense (or at least, not yet). But NASA is just the kind of environment where Linux has and continues to flourish.
    1. Re:NASA's IT Favor by Mr+Bubble · · Score: 1

      I live right next to JSC. I spoke with a guy in the weather modeling section about a year ago at an open house event. He said that they are slowly moving in the direction of Linux, but that there is no reason to abandon their Unix boxes (he had an HP unix maxhine) at the present time as they tended to work fine and would for the forseeable future.

      --
      "The world is a construct of forceful imagination. Those who don't know walk around in the reailties of those who do"
    2. Re:NASA's IT Favor by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that Slashdot has reported other installations of Linux at JSC. And it might be interesting to note that even during Garman's reign, MOD (the Directorate that handles Mission Control) had a standard install that involved a dual-boot Linux and Windows environment.


      ...they are slowly moving in the direction of Linux, but that there is no reason to abandon their Unix boxes (he had an HP unix maxhine) at the present time as they tended to work fine and would for the forseeable future.


      Sure. The HP/UX machines are fine workstations. And it makes sense to get full use of that investment. But eventually it comes time to re-up support contracts or replace hardware. This is the time that management often looks at cheaper alternatives. That's traditionally been Windows.

      Linux offers a way to keep a Unix(like) environment and take advantage of commodity hardware. It helps that more and more of the apps used by EA are now available for Linux.

      With all that in consideration, there's little suprise that even the CIO's office has been taking and interest in Linux. One will see it more often in the JSC IT environment.

      Of course - one will probably see more Macs. And continue to see HP/UX and Sun workstations / servers. And Windows servers. And the plethora of Windows office automation desktops.
  62. Linux to Control Entire Satellite by mstrcat · · Score: 1

    Linux will be used as _the_ operating system to control an future satellite launched by the Naval Post Graduate school. Linux will not just be used to control just one experiment or a laptop in the shuttle, it is going to be running the entire satellite.
    Yes, the hardware is very modest (486 processor) because of the availibity of space tested hardware and radiation tolerance. However, it's rather exciting that an entire satellite will be controlled with Linux, both in orbit, and at the ground station. See this PDF paper for details of this project.
    http://www.sp.nps.navy.mil/npsat1/techni cal/SSC02- I-4_Paper.pdf

  63. Heat dissipation in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Heat dissipation in space is a factor. I recall something about a regular plastic flashlight that MELTED in the shuttle bay because without an atmosphere even the few watts generated by a flashlight won't go no where.

    If this PC will also be used in a vacuum, heat dissipation will become a major problem. Cooling a 70W processor would be a major engineering challenge and no, a simple heatsink fan won't cut it.

    If so inclined, try putting your (dude, i got a) Dell into a vacuum chamber and see how long it lasts.

  64. No by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

    You dont know what you are talking about.

    NASA uses IBM AP-101 chips in the shuttle. See here and here
    Also most space based applications use 8/16 bit chips because most spaced based applications don't require more than that and the wider the CPU register, the more parity bits are required. Thats why most satellites use 8-16 bit chips.

    The robot used on mars was an 8 bit 8085.

    Please get your facts straight before posting.

  65. Re:virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asshole

  66. It should be said... by kentyman · · Score: 1
    I know you meant no disrespect when you said this, but it should be noted that "that astronaut lady" was mission specialist Laurel Clark, one of the seven brave astronauts killed the morning of February 1st, 2003, when the space shuttle Columbia tragically disintegrated over Texas.

    Though your comment was made before this accident, it just didn't seem right leaving it without saying something.

    --
    You know where you are? You're in the $PATH, baby. You're gonna get executed!
  67. Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be Bill's "rocket", eh?

  68. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Fortune suggests uses for YOUR favorite UNIX commands!

    Try:
    ar t "God"
    drink matter (Bourne Shell)
    rm God
    man: Why did you get a divorce? (C shell)
    date me (anything up to 4.3BSD)
    make "heads or tails of all this"
    who is smart
    (C shell)
    If I had a ) for every dollar of the national debt, what would I have?
    sleep with me (anything up to 4.3BSD)

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...