However, Facebook recently decided to hold my account hostage against me giving them my mobile phone. Sadly, with no mobile phone, the 5 year old account will likely remain locked. The funny thing is, going cold-turkey on facebook is like any addiction: painful and traumatic the first day, then less and less so. Just say no to Facebook, then you don't have to worry about Russian propaganda telling you to vote for this or that bunch of crooked politicians.
MP3 players seem to be a dying breed, killed off by cell phones. I am a huge fan of the Sansa Clip and Clip+ lines. I use them to listen to audiobooks, and the Sansa devices integrate well with the Audible.com software (which sucks btw). Currently the Sansa devices command a premium on Amazon since they've been discontinued by Sansa but still have a fan base.
For my money, Sansa Clip was the best MP3 player. It wasn't Apple (no iTunes lock in), had decent memory sizes (4 GB, now 8 GB + microSD card), a nicely simple interface. The glaring flaw was the headphone jack. It would wear out (stop making good contact) after about two years heavy use.
This is not the best way to win a battle of ideas. Neil Gaiman says quite nicely here: http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2015/05/neil-gaiman-credo
Now I'm going to start searching youtube trying to get censored.
Oh, yeah, and now I won't be able to trust any of google searches either.
I'll give them a pass on net neutrality, as it's really not their fight. What they need to be fighting is regional content deals. I am so sick of having Netflix spastically fail if I'm using a VPN.
The calculations to predict when the space station will actually de-orbit are nearly as complex as weather forecasts. It's impossible to do long term, accurate predictions. As for damage, that is one possibility, though lack of fuel to do the final de-orbit burn is also a possibility. As far as suggestions to do weapons testing on it to break up the station, that is a absolutely terrible idea; it just adds to the growing orbital space junk problem.
I have had several long acrimonious conversation with the chat bots that Netflix calls customer service and have come away extremely disappointed.
1) Netflix doesn't care that your a US citizen and your VPN gives you a US geolocation. This is too sensible an approach I guess. They also turn a deaf ear to the 'vpn use for computing safety' argument.
2) Netflix doesn't have an email address that you can send complaints. They like postal mail when hearing from customers.
3) I have lodged complaints to both the FTC (no response) and FCC (a stretch, but they've seemed consumer friendly of late, also no response.)
4) To date none of the netflix chat bots can point me to a terms of service that allows such denial of service. This long after they've started doing it makes me think they are afraid of putting it writing for fear of the consequences.
5) I've been considering a small claims action. Since it's not in the terms of service, a breach of contract claim might work.
Law enforcement as in the individuals in our various agencies that decided that no one deserved any privacy.
On a related note, every time i read about some government official whinging about terrorism and child predators, I just ignore them. They've cried wolf too many times.
I think I would rather they concentrate on putting more government information online, making government more open rather than implementing systems to make citizens prove who they are.
The article was pretty light on the actual science behind the leak detection, and what it implies. Here's a few facts to help you understand more.
5,000+ 'leaks': This is actually 5000+ areas where the concentration of methane is above some pre-determined number. The instruments used measure into parts-per-billion range, and they also classify every high reading as a leak. While this is likely true in the majority of cases, they seem to neglect things like anaerobic decomposition in sewers, drains and other such places.
'Explosion': Combustion of methane in an unenclosed space has a flame propagation speed that is sub-sonic. Enclosed spaces change the physics of the produced pressure wave and can explode. As methane is lighter than air, this is actually quite difficult to achieve naturally. Propane and higher hydrocarbons are heavier than air and tend to collection in low areas.
'10 times the thresh hold for explosion': See above. Methane's lower flammability limit is 5% (in air), and the upper bond is 25%. This concentration would have been too rich to be flammable (5% x 10 = 50%). However at that concentration, the atmosphere in the space is approximately 10% oxygen and you would suffocate.
How is the FBI agent not guilty of the following?
1) Breach of chattel -> spy ware program on laptop belonging to the public
2) Wire tap violations -> electronically monitoring communications of another citizen
3) Unlawful access to computer services/devices to which he had no legal right to.
4) Vandalism of public property
5) Wire fraud
I don't care what the guy found, he broke the law doing it. Not only should any information collected be tossed out, he needs to be prosecuted.
Further more, I'm really sick of hearing judges weasel out of upholding my 4th amendment rights. I'm almost as angry with the spineless judge as I am at the FBI guy for his role in this.He needs to do about a year in prison.
I'm not at all comfortable with credit card companies making unilateral and largely black-box decisions like this. While it's true that having a Visa account is not a right, I'm expect them to provide services without making such decisions for me. I feel as if I have more to worry from Visa than I have from the people they claim are selling shady goods.
Re:Ok, let's see you died in the wool capitalists
on
OnLive Acquires OnLive
·
· Score: 2
I'm not sure if I can defend it, but it actually happens quite frequently to start-ups that burn through investment monies before they become profitable. Essentially a group of people invest money...we'll say A-D in this case.. At some time after investment, company X is still not profitable and have spent all the invested capital and none of the investors want to put new money in. If no one is interested in the business, it just dies. All the workers get fired, any debts get settled in court, and all the investors loose 100% of their investment. In many cases however, one or more of the investors will say, "I'll buy the company for Y dollars, assume the debts, hire some of the staff, ect.". Sometimes Y is very low, so all the remaining investors get nearly completely wiped out, all the stock is worthless. I think of it like a poker game where everyone else folded. Surprisingly the staff at the new company isn't typically all that upset about loosing their stock options. They've known for a while their company wasn't making any money and the options were worthless anyway.
If by 'heatmap' you mean the map that shows 1st year expected radiation exposure in REM? There is nothing wrong with that graphic. I has clearly labeled units and values. I don't find anything scary at all about it, nor is it misleading in any respect.
The rest of the article does gets a little wishy-washy talking about the 'Denver Dose' and other concepts that are nothing besides poorly supported theories, and even goes to complain that the current best model of the dangers of radiation doesn't fit with his own hopes and wishes. Nevertheless the graphic ATMAvator complains of doesn't have the faults he attributes to it.
First of all, enjoy a good chuckle at the term 'Biogas'. Most literature refers to it as 'Landfill gas' and the majority of landfill locations think of it as a waste product to be disposed of as cheaply as possible, mostly through flaring operations. The term 'Biogas' was invented by someone that that wanted to game California's renewable energy programs.
As a fuel, it's marginal, having about 500 BTU per standard cubic foot of gas. Most sources are 10% nitrogen, 40% CO2, 45% methane and the balance oxygen, H2S, water, ethane, ect. The energy cost to clean the gas up to the point where something as high tech as a Bloom Box can use it can reach 60% of the energy of the entire gas stream, as water and CO2 removal are both energy expensive operations.
Still, with all it's disadvantages, I hope Apple is able to make the system work reliably, if only because it's a hard engineering problem they are tackling. And it will be a good proof-of-practicality for the Bloom Boxes.
This is some of Tanith Lee's early work, published in 5 novels from 5 novels from 1978 to 1987. These are some of the best works of fantasy I've ever read.
My second nomination would be the fairie tale collections by Terry Windling and Ellen Datlow. Starting with 'Snow White, Blood Red' and continuing through 'Black Heart, Ivory Bones', those two brought the grim back to fairie tales (and the delight too) that we miss in some of the Disney-ized versions.
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/ is a great resource for looking up bibliographies and writing order of many of the more well known fantasy and sci-fi authors.
So I'm one of those netflix subscribers that jumped ship. I felt the price increase was more than the service was worth. Netflix picked a very bad time to increase prices, and in particular picked a very very poor way to do it. They could have hiked prices slowly over time, and it would have likely not been enough to really re-evaluate the value I get from them. To raise prices 27% at once was too much to swallow. And worst of all was their assumption that I should automatically be subcribed to their new plans.
Good bye, netflix. It was nice knowing you.
The idea that these are 'fair lawsuits' that you and the previous poster put forth is nonsense. The article says they are looking for statutory damages. The absolute minimum is $750. Statutory damages are decided by the jury, not by the lawyers; and I know of no jury that has awarded less than $10,000. The same group has put for letters for Far Cry, extorting (via threat of law suit) $1500. Which means we are already at 200x actual damages.
Then we come to the enormous trail of evidence that has to be looked at:
A computer G in the hands of someone with lots of money to be made says address X is downloading file y.
Address X is transmitted to corporation C.
Corporation C says that address belongs to subscriber S.
Subscriber S could be the only person at the keyboard.
That entire trail has to be absolutely perfect. Every program that handled the 'evidence' can be proven never ever to make a mistake, Corporation C must know perfectly that their records are pristine and that no unauthorized persons have access, and that there is absolutely no possibility of any sort of error. There can't be any possibility that anyone could have used S's computer without her knowledge. But most importantly, the person that stands to gain many $10,000s can be trusted never to just add a few extra addresses in there. Hey, if you're going to sue 5,000 people, you might as well just toss in a few hundred more random addresses just for the fun of it and push your profit a little more. It's not like anyone is really caring how the big law firms and movie studios and distribution houses are abusing people here.
From my view point, lawyers and big content have decided that copyright infringement is a new profit center. There is no down side, all you do is grab a few random IP address, send a few thousand demand letters. The ISPs do all the leg work for you for free, and you pick one unlucky loser to actually sue so that the rest of the people that get your extortion letters are scared to tell you 'no'.
The only way to fix this mess is to remove the statutory damages; to limit damages to 10x actual damages or 50x profits made from distribution.
So I'm pretty much convinced that the US patent system is completely borked as far as its 'promote the arts and sciences', at least in the realm of software and business methods. These patents easily lend themselves to patent abuse and Apple, HP, MPEG-LA are some of the worst of bunch. And even if we get some decent patent reform, previously filed patents are still going to cause head-aches for a couple of decades.
Perhaps the solution is similar to Eminent Domain, only in this case things like the MPEG-LA patent pools are forcibly bought up for a few million dollars and pushed into the public domain. Once the patents are pushed into the public domain, MPEG-LA can use their expertise to develop the new generation of video codecs, instead of claiming 'no one can develop any compressed video software without a license from us.
Another type of engine that really likes to run at a constant speed are gas engines (primarily methane or propane). This sort of equipment would be a huge benefit to the natural gas industry as it would allow variable speed compression while the driving engine runs at a constant speed. Currently you have to put a generator and a variable speed electrical drive in between the driver motor and the compressor.
So I almost lost my breakfast over this one. The amendment doesn't say word one about getting anything useful, only that the spending continue. The legislators in question don't seem to care if the money spent returns anything worthwhile, only that we keep spending. Barf! No wonder everyone hates politicians.
The price of Matlab (minimum of $2000), more like $10K for a decent set of tool boxes. They charge 20% per year for 'maintenance', though thankfully you don't have to buy a maintenance contract to use the software.
And for all of this, they can't be bothered to support 64 bit integers? I'd be asking very pointed questions about why not, if I had a license.
As if I didn't have reason enough to despise Apple, they pull this sort of stunt. And yes, I blame Apple completely and without reservation, whole-heartedly convinced of both malice and the intent to cause harm entirely beyond the pale. Apple as a company, and as a way of doing business, deserves only contempt and scorn.
I have to agree, I would never buy products that are hostage of the distributors good will. I own several Ubisoft titles, an in general I thought that they were excellently done. However no matter how good the game is, the current DRM scheme would keep me from buying it. No matter how 'evolved' or 'improved' they try to spin it, I won't be buying games that can't be installed on a stand-alone machine, non-networked computer.
Slashdot Mirror
However, Facebook recently decided to hold my account hostage against me giving them my mobile phone. Sadly, with no mobile phone, the 5 year old account will likely remain locked. The funny thing is, going cold-turkey on facebook is like any addiction: painful and traumatic the first day, then less and less so. Just say no to Facebook, then you don't have to worry about Russian propaganda telling you to vote for this or that bunch of crooked politicians.
MP3 players seem to be a dying breed, killed off by cell phones. I am a huge fan of the Sansa Clip and Clip+ lines. I use them to listen to audiobooks, and the Sansa devices integrate well with the Audible.com software (which sucks btw). Currently the Sansa devices command a premium on Amazon since they've been discontinued by Sansa but still have a fan base. For my money, Sansa Clip was the best MP3 player. It wasn't Apple (no iTunes lock in), had decent memory sizes (4 GB, now 8 GB + microSD card), a nicely simple interface. The glaring flaw was the headphone jack. It would wear out (stop making good contact) after about two years heavy use.
This is not the best way to win a battle of ideas. Neil Gaiman says quite nicely here: http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2015/05/neil-gaiman-credo Now I'm going to start searching youtube trying to get censored. Oh, yeah, and now I won't be able to trust any of google searches either.
I'll give them a pass on net neutrality, as it's really not their fight. What they need to be fighting is regional content deals. I am so sick of having Netflix spastically fail if I'm using a VPN.
The calculations to predict when the space station will actually de-orbit are nearly as complex as weather forecasts. It's impossible to do long term, accurate predictions. As for damage, that is one possibility, though lack of fuel to do the final de-orbit burn is also a possibility. As far as suggestions to do weapons testing on it to break up the station, that is a absolutely terrible idea; it just adds to the growing orbital space junk problem.
I have had several long acrimonious conversation with the chat bots that Netflix calls customer service and have come away extremely disappointed. 1) Netflix doesn't care that your a US citizen and your VPN gives you a US geolocation. This is too sensible an approach I guess. They also turn a deaf ear to the 'vpn use for computing safety' argument. 2) Netflix doesn't have an email address that you can send complaints. They like postal mail when hearing from customers. 3) I have lodged complaints to both the FTC (no response) and FCC (a stretch, but they've seemed consumer friendly of late, also no response.) 4) To date none of the netflix chat bots can point me to a terms of service that allows such denial of service. This long after they've started doing it makes me think they are afraid of putting it writing for fear of the consequences. 5) I've been considering a small claims action. Since it's not in the terms of service, a breach of contract claim might work.
Law enforcement as in the individuals in our various agencies that decided that no one deserved any privacy. On a related note, every time i read about some government official whinging about terrorism and child predators, I just ignore them. They've cried wolf too many times.
I think I would rather they concentrate on putting more government information online, making government more open rather than implementing systems to make citizens prove who they are.
The article was pretty light on the actual science behind the leak detection, and what it implies. Here's a few facts to help you understand more. 5,000+ 'leaks': This is actually 5000+ areas where the concentration of methane is above some pre-determined number. The instruments used measure into parts-per-billion range, and they also classify every high reading as a leak. While this is likely true in the majority of cases, they seem to neglect things like anaerobic decomposition in sewers, drains and other such places. 'Explosion': Combustion of methane in an unenclosed space has a flame propagation speed that is sub-sonic. Enclosed spaces change the physics of the produced pressure wave and can explode. As methane is lighter than air, this is actually quite difficult to achieve naturally. Propane and higher hydrocarbons are heavier than air and tend to collection in low areas. '10 times the thresh hold for explosion': See above. Methane's lower flammability limit is 5% (in air), and the upper bond is 25%. This concentration would have been too rich to be flammable (5% x 10 = 50%). However at that concentration, the atmosphere in the space is approximately 10% oxygen and you would suffocate.
There hasn't been enough in the news lately to be scarred so the helpful congressfuck decided to try and create some more.
How is the FBI agent not guilty of the following? 1) Breach of chattel -> spy ware program on laptop belonging to the public 2) Wire tap violations -> electronically monitoring communications of another citizen 3) Unlawful access to computer services/devices to which he had no legal right to. 4) Vandalism of public property 5) Wire fraud I don't care what the guy found, he broke the law doing it. Not only should any information collected be tossed out, he needs to be prosecuted. Further more, I'm really sick of hearing judges weasel out of upholding my 4th amendment rights. I'm almost as angry with the spineless judge as I am at the FBI guy for his role in this.He needs to do about a year in prison.
I'm not at all comfortable with credit card companies making unilateral and largely black-box decisions like this. While it's true that having a Visa account is not a right, I'm expect them to provide services without making such decisions for me. I feel as if I have more to worry from Visa than I have from the people they claim are selling shady goods.
I'm not sure if I can defend it, but it actually happens quite frequently to start-ups that burn through investment monies before they become profitable. Essentially a group of people invest money...we'll say A-D in this case.. At some time after investment, company X is still not profitable and have spent all the invested capital and none of the investors want to put new money in. If no one is interested in the business, it just dies. All the workers get fired, any debts get settled in court, and all the investors loose 100% of their investment. In many cases however, one or more of the investors will say, "I'll buy the company for Y dollars, assume the debts, hire some of the staff, ect.". Sometimes Y is very low, so all the remaining investors get nearly completely wiped out, all the stock is worthless. I think of it like a poker game where everyone else folded. Surprisingly the staff at the new company isn't typically all that upset about loosing their stock options. They've known for a while their company wasn't making any money and the options were worthless anyway.
The rest of the article does gets a little wishy-washy talking about the 'Denver Dose' and other concepts that are nothing besides poorly supported theories, and even goes to complain that the current best model of the dangers of radiation doesn't fit with his own hopes and wishes. Nevertheless the graphic ATMAvator complains of doesn't have the faults he attributes to it.
First of all, enjoy a good chuckle at the term 'Biogas'. Most literature refers to it as 'Landfill gas' and the majority of landfill locations think of it as a waste product to be disposed of as cheaply as possible, mostly through flaring operations. The term 'Biogas' was invented by someone that that wanted to game California's renewable energy programs.
As a fuel, it's marginal, having about 500 BTU per standard cubic foot of gas. Most sources are 10% nitrogen, 40% CO2, 45% methane and the balance oxygen, H2S, water, ethane, ect. The energy cost to clean the gas up to the point where something as high tech as a Bloom Box can use it can reach 60% of the energy of the entire gas stream, as water and CO2 removal are both energy expensive operations.
Still, with all it's disadvantages, I hope Apple is able to make the system work reliably, if only because it's a hard engineering problem they are tackling. And it will be a good proof-of-practicality for the Bloom Boxes.
Minimum cost for me to ask Siri the same thing: $1900.
So I'm thinking I can put up with typing my questions into google for the difference.
So yeah, feel free to laugh at the people yelling at Siri through their iphone.
My second nomination would be the fairie tale collections by Terry Windling and Ellen Datlow. Starting with 'Snow White, Blood Red' and continuing through 'Black Heart, Ivory Bones', those two brought the grim back to fairie tales (and the delight too) that we miss in some of the Disney-ized versions.
http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/ is a great resource for looking up bibliographies and writing order of many of the more well known fantasy and sci-fi authors.
So I'm one of those netflix subscribers that jumped ship. I felt the price increase was more than the service was worth. Netflix picked a very bad time to increase prices, and in particular picked a very very poor way to do it. They could have hiked prices slowly over time, and it would have likely not been enough to really re-evaluate the value I get from them. To raise prices 27% at once was too much to swallow. And worst of all was their assumption that I should automatically be subcribed to their new plans. Good bye, netflix. It was nice knowing you.
The idea that these are 'fair lawsuits' that you and the previous poster put forth is nonsense. The article says they are looking for statutory damages. The absolute minimum is $750. Statutory damages are decided by the jury, not by the lawyers; and I know of no jury that has awarded less than $10,000. The same group has put for letters for Far Cry, extorting (via threat of law suit) $1500. Which means we are already at 200x actual damages.
Then we come to the enormous trail of evidence that has to be looked at:
A computer G in the hands of someone with lots of money to be made says address X is downloading file y.
Address X is transmitted to corporation C.
Corporation C says that address belongs to subscriber S.
Subscriber S could be the only person at the keyboard.
That entire trail has to be absolutely perfect. Every program that handled the 'evidence' can be proven never ever to make a mistake, Corporation C must know perfectly that their records are pristine and that no unauthorized persons have access, and that there is absolutely no possibility of any sort of error. There can't be any possibility that anyone could have used S's computer without her knowledge. But most importantly, the person that stands to gain many $10,000s can be trusted never to just add a few extra addresses in there. Hey, if you're going to sue 5,000 people, you might as well just toss in a few hundred more random addresses just for the fun of it and push your profit a little more. It's not like anyone is really caring how the big law firms and movie studios and distribution houses are abusing people here.
From my view point, lawyers and big content have decided that copyright infringement is a new profit center. There is no down side, all you do is grab a few random IP address, send a few thousand demand letters. The ISPs do all the leg work for you for free, and you pick one unlucky loser to actually sue so that the rest of the people that get your extortion letters are scared to tell you 'no'.
The only way to fix this mess is to remove the statutory damages; to limit damages to 10x actual damages or 50x profits made from distribution.
So I'm pretty much convinced that the US patent system is completely borked as far as its 'promote the arts and sciences', at least in the realm of software and business methods. These patents easily lend themselves to patent abuse and Apple, HP, MPEG-LA are some of the worst of bunch. And even if we get some decent patent reform, previously filed patents are still going to cause head-aches for a couple of decades. Perhaps the solution is similar to Eminent Domain, only in this case things like the MPEG-LA patent pools are forcibly bought up for a few million dollars and pushed into the public domain. Once the patents are pushed into the public domain, MPEG-LA can use their expertise to develop the new generation of video codecs, instead of claiming 'no one can develop any compressed video software without a license from us.
Another type of engine that really likes to run at a constant speed are gas engines (primarily methane or propane). This sort of equipment would be a huge benefit to the natural gas industry as it would allow variable speed compression while the driving engine runs at a constant speed. Currently you have to put a generator and a variable speed electrical drive in between the driver motor and the compressor.
So I almost lost my breakfast over this one. The amendment doesn't say word one about getting anything useful, only that the spending continue. The legislators in question don't seem to care if the money spent returns anything worthwhile, only that we keep spending. Barf! No wonder everyone hates politicians.
The price of Matlab (minimum of $2000), more like $10K for a decent set of tool boxes. They charge 20% per year for 'maintenance', though thankfully you don't have to buy a maintenance contract to use the software. And for all of this, they can't be bothered to support 64 bit integers? I'd be asking very pointed questions about why not, if I had a license.
As if I didn't have reason enough to despise Apple, they pull this sort of stunt. And yes, I blame Apple completely and without reservation, whole-heartedly convinced of both malice and the intent to cause harm entirely beyond the pale. Apple as a company, and as a way of doing business, deserves only contempt and scorn.
I have to agree, I would never buy products that are hostage of the distributors good will. I own several Ubisoft titles, an in general I thought that they were excellently done. However no matter how good the game is, the current DRM scheme would keep me from buying it. No matter how 'evolved' or 'improved' they try to spin it, I won't be buying games that can't be installed on a stand-alone machine, non-networked computer.