Slashdot Mirror


Dell Introduces Laptop With WUXGA

Cutie Pi writes "Dell has just released the Inspiron 8500, a new 15.4" widescreen notebook with a WUXGA screen--thats 1920x1200, high enough resolution to watch HDTV quality movies. Couple that with the new nVidia 64MB GeForce4 4200 Go (much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000), and you've got quite a notebook!! Can't wait to get my hands on one!"

71 of 512 comments (clear)

  1. Just for movies? by lightspawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    You realize some geeks are going to use this resolution to view more text on the screen at once and lose their eyesight that much faster, don't you?

    1. Re:Just for movies? by jmv · · Score: 4, Informative

      You realize some geeks are going to use this resolution to view more text on the screen at once and lose their eyesight that much faster, don't you? ...or just to have the same amount of text, but much sharper due the the increased resolution.

    2. Re:Just for movies? by Shadowlion · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...or just to have the same amount of text, but much sharper due the the increased resolution.

      It may be sharper, but it's going to be much smaller.

      My coworker bought a Dell not too long ago that has a 15.0" screen with a screen resolution of 1600x1200 (for the purposes of software development, natch). It's very hard to read at more than a few inches.

      On the other hand, I have a Gateway laptop with a 15.7" screen at its native 1280x1024. Now, I'll grant you that I can't cram the same amount of stuff on the screen as my coworker can. However, it's significantly easier to read my screen -- especially from more than a few inches -- that it is to read the screen on the other laptop.

    3. Re:Just for movies? by jmv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By sharper but not smaller, I mean that I can make the fonts larger (in pixels) so that the keep the same "real size". That means that there are now more pixels that define each letter, making it sharper.

    4. Re:Just for movies? by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Increase the font size on the other machine. A higher resolution gives you easier to read text. Period.

      Pushing 1600x1200, especially with Cleartype really strains your CPU though.

    5. Re:Just for movies? by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Informative

      A font that is meant to be 10pt will be 10pt on any screen or printed on paper, unless there is an error in the software rendering it. If you use a decent OS (one that knows about this) then 10pt will be perfectly readable on one of those Dells. In any OS that uses X, you can tell X what the physical resolution of your screen is, and it will adjust the points to pixels ratio to account for the screen size. I think plug 'n' play monitors should also send this info to the computer so it can all happen automatically.

    6. Re:Just for movies? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have one of those laptops. I use KDE, and I just set X to run at 133 DPI, which is the native DPI of the screen. Fonts are *extremely* crisp, and the same size as they would be on any other display. 12pt means 12/72 (1/6) of an inch, not 12 pixels. If you set things correctly (pass the -- -dpi 133 option to X, or change the DPI setting in Windows) pretty much everything should scale just fine, and you get a huge payoff in readibility.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  2. Aspect ratio of a brick... by critic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    and weighs as much, too! 6.9 lbs w/o a media drive!! and 1.5" thick. I'll keep my TiBook (or even a new 17" AlBook), thank you very much. :)

  3. A great display by flikx · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a screen at that resolution, I just might be able to view an entire slashdot advertisement at once. Wow, no scrolling for me.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:A great display by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's what annoys me.. Finding laptops with screens 15-16" or so that do 1600x1200 and 1920x1200 is trivial, but it's almost impossible to find a desktop flat panel that does 1600x1200 at much larger screen sizes!

      Who needs 1920x1200 on a 15" screen? yet we have to put up with 1280x1024 on 19" screens on the desktop...

    2. Re:A great display by lingqi · · Score: 2, Informative
      dode, that's a whacky statement.

      First, let's try a SONY 23"

      Then, we have a Samsung 24"

      Of course we can't forget the Apple 23"

      All rated at 1920x1200. Now, if you want cheap, Dell makes a FP2000 at 1600x1200 (20") that can usually be gotten for under 1000. Too bad they sell out faster than hot cakes.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    3. Re:A great display by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really don't understand why anyone would use a flat panel on the desktop. The cost per square foot saved doesn't come close yet to the cost of a square foot in an average home. And you can currently get 19" monitors capable of 2048x1536 for under $300. I have 3 such 19" monitors running at 1600x1200 each on my machine and can't see why anyone would settle for less. My 3 monitors + video cards cost less than a single 19" flat panel. And Ghost Recon at 2048x1536 is really cool :o)

      By the way, I've found the trick to happiness with 19" monitors at high resolution is a horizontal dot pitch of around 0.22. Anything higher causes letters to have fuzzy edges. Its this that causes eyestrain, not the size of the text. The secret to easier reading is greater sharpness, not larger size. In fact, making the size larger greatly slows the reading because there is less text in the region of sharpest focus. Most of us read at least phrases if not sentences or paragraphs, not letters and words. If you can't see a whole phrase at once in focus, you have to revert to a more primitive word by word reading pattern.

  4. Neat monitor, ugly notebook... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... What is with Dell and their ugly-ass notebooks? Fucking BODY CLADDING, ala Landau roofs on Lincolns.. They're not fooling anybody..

    Apple's got the prettiest notebooks by far, with Sony and IBM the only credible alternatives IMHO.. Dell stuff just looks like Taiwanese junk..

  5. Apple.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple Called... They want their laptop design from 2 years ago back.

    1. Re:Apple.. by 11223 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then they called again to apologize for including a SuperDrive, a battery life worth talking about, FireWire 800, and forgetting the extra thickness. Of course, you might have been talking about the Mac Portable.

  6. Slashvertisement by macshune · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ads for nerds. Shit that we can't afford.

  7. i own an 8200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and the NVIDIA video drivers cause the machine to blue screen once/week. Dell says that this is "an ongoing issue between Dell and Microsoft". There is no driver update available.

    Dell sells a lot of stuff that's not ready for prime time - is the 8500 yet another example?

    1. Re:i own an 8200 by darken9999 · · Score: 2
      Granted that they're not the same, but I had the same problem with XP on my 8100 (Nvidia).

      Switching from the default Microsoft "Dell" to "Dell Mobile" driver stopped the constant crashing.

      Then I just said to hell with it and switched to ATI, which is installed on my Mac.

  8. Notebook != Laptop by PseudoThink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Despite the headline, one can't really call it a "laptop", since using it on one's lap would create safety (and fertility) issues. Dell's official term is "notebook", but I believe "mobile computer", "traytop", and "portable space heater" are also acceptable. I challenge anyone to actually sit through a two-hour HD movie with this on their lap.

  9. Ram Prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Gotta love this gouging, under the customization look at what they charge for extra ram:

    512MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms
    512MB,DDR,266MHz 1 Dimm [add $200.00]
    640MB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $300.00]
    768BM,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $400.00]
    1GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $650.00]
    1.5GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $1,800.00]
    2GB,DDR,266MHz 2 Dimms [add $3,300.00]

    1. Re:Ram Prices by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative


      MacMall gives you 512MB RAM free.

      Of course, you have to pay the $39.99 'install fee', but look at what Dell wants for more RAM, or what it'd cost you to buy the memory from NewEgg/etc

      On a side note - $39.99 to pop the keyboard off and stick a DIMM in?!

    2. Re:Ram Prices by yelims · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's why when I bought my Inspiron 8200 back in December, I only ordered it with 128MB, and ordered a 512MB chip from Crucial.

      My only issue was, when I was running several application, I would notice a slow down. I would get frequent messages from XP stating that it was going to resize my pagefile.

      Well, a week or so ago, I decided to check things out. Since I ordered my laptop with 128MB, Dell had set the pagefile to: minimum 128MB/maximum 384MB. Why they don't just leave it on auto is beyond me. But just be warned if you decide to go the route I went.

    3. Re:Ram Prices by lingqi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a 8100 and 512M; I disable paging altogether; It's just not worth it - I mean, HD access slow things down AND drains power. I see no reason why anything I do should not fit into the 512M space (I know there are people who needs more for other stuff - but come on it's a laptop). Anything that needs more would usually use its own page file anyway (UT2k3, photoshop, etc etc).

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

  10. Better be a short movie... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And what are the chances of actually being able to see the end of that HDTV movie before the battery runs down?

    Not good, I'd say...

    1. Re:Better be a short movie... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I got my current job, it came with a Dell laptop (Inspiron 5000 series) with a DVD drive. Whee!

      On my first business trip, I found out that the battery was enough to watch about 66% of a DVD.

      Later that year, I found out that my battery was being recalled, but they'd apologize by giving me two batteries in return -- double-Whee! Now I would have enough battery life to watch a full flick.

      I just have to pop out the DVD drive to install the second battery.

  11. Re:specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no excuse for a 7 pound 15in notebook.

    I once beat a man to death in Reno* using nothing but a Dell laptop.

    *just to watch him die

  12. GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Informative

    much faster than the ATI Radeon 9000

    What's that? The poster must have meant the ATI Mobility Radeon 9000, which is much different from the Radeon 9000 Pro AGP card.

    1. Re:GeForce4 Go, faster than what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The mobility radeon 9000 is over 6 months old, and is actually a true notebook chip designed for low power consumption.

      The GF4 4200 go is simply the desktop chip with lowered clockspeeds. It's comparable to the Geforce FX, puts out way too much heat for the application, and introduced just for the purpose of taking the performance lead from a 6 month old design from ATI. I'm surprised that someone actually used this chip...

      In a matter of days, ATI will release the M10, and nVidia will release nv31, both of which will offer better performance, support for directx 9.0 and have much lower power consumption...

      Anyone who buys this will be stuck with a battery draining, hot running card that held the performance lead for a total of 1 month before superior designs appeared

  13. my dell.. by MousePotato · · Score: 5, Informative

    I bought an Inspiron 7500 when the PIII 500 chips were first made available in laptops. It has been a few years now and this machine has been all over the US, banged up, dropped, kicked, etc. at jobsites, conventions & seminars. The only thing that has gone wrong with it have been the CD burning out playing CTP and the 'm' key jumping off. I hope the new line can stand up to the kind of abuse this one has because this machine is still kickin and I would certainly consider buying another one in the future.

  14. If I had to do it all over again... by ilsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would definitely go thin and light. I bought the most powerful, largest screened laptop I could find (at the time). However, it's so unweildy, and drains battery power like nothing else. If I'm lucky (with two batteries in it) I'll be able to surf for 1 hour before it goes dead. Plus, by the amount of heat it generates, I know I'm going to have lap cancer by age 35.

    In other words, I cant do a whole lot with it, and it's really heavy and awkward. My dad on the other hand, has a super small Sony Vaio that can go about 6 hours on a battery and still do everything I do, even though it's more underpowered.

  15. 1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    geez, I've got a 16.1" screen on my Sony Vaio laptop, and the native resolution on that is 1600x1200. I couldn't imagine a _smaller_ screen with a higher resolution. Would make reading anything with a font size below 16pt impossible I'd assume. I can barely cope with 12pt on the 1600x1200 16.1" screen.

    1. Re:1900x1200 @ 15.4" screen by b-baggins · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not true. Windows GUI elements are tied to 96 PPI. If your screen resolution goes up to 144 DPI, then all your 16-pt fonts are now half again smaller.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
  16. Going to look darned silly by LiftOp · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...with the wire going to my HDTV antenna.

    Maybe I can get a headband-mount for it, that'll get the chicks to come a-runnin'.

  17. Dell accessories by Virtex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet, a new computer from Dell. Does it come with a free sample of Marijuana? Dude, you're gettin' some weed!

    Ok, that's just cruel.

    --
    For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    1. Re:Dell accessories by gvonk · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no. Come on. We all know that marijuana is a gateway drug...

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  18. Resolution in Games by Kaypro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having never used a widescreen aspect ratio screen I was curious as to how games handle these odd resolutions. Do they actually recognize and adjust for the aspect ratio or simply default to the highest available 3:4 setting which means the graphics start to blur? Anyone know?

    1. Re:Resolution in Games by tbmaddux · · Score: 5, Informative
      Having never used a widescreen aspect ratio screen I was curious as to how games handle these odd resolutions.
      Depends on the game, the screen, and the OS.

      Some support the native resolution (for example, I can play Civ III or Warcraft III on my 17" FP iMac in 1440x900). This is fantastic.

      Some will keep the screen at native resolution and give you bars on the borders (for example, a 1024x768 box inside my 1440x900 screen). This isn't so bad. Also not so bad is linearly downscaling the screen a little bit -- it's not as blurry as you might think, at least not for me in MacOS X -- displaying an 800x600 box inside a 1024x640 screen, for example.

      What's annoying is when the game runs fullscreen in a 4:3 resolution and stretches it. This is what Diablo II / LOD does, so it smears 800x600 out laterally to fill the screen. The OS refers to this as a "stretched" resolution and it looks awful. I play this game in windowed mode and reduce my resolution so that it is a window that nearly fills the screen, with my desktop peeking out the sides. Better.

      Nearly all the flat panels I see nowadays are in strange resolutions or aspect ratios (my 17" studio display is 5:4 while my iMac is 8:5), and the persistence of companies that continue to try to slap a new acronym on it like FUGA or BARGA is laughable. Just publish the dimensions and resolution, please.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  19. Re:...you got quite a notebook. by praetorian_x · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It may be me, but I would rather have a cheaper, lighter notebook with a long (8 hours or there abouts) batterylife than a HDTV+DVD-player combo with a computer attaced. But hey, each to his or her own."

    Ditto

    check out http://www.dynamism.com. Japanese laptops with a US warranty.

    The sharp MM1 looks sweet, and it doubles as a USB2 hard drive.

    Cheers,
    prat

  20. Neat and cool, but . . . by Maxwell'sSilverLART · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a neat laptop, and I'm sure it would make a great desktop replacement, or even a good gaming laptop. That said, though, I can't bring myself to buy another Dell machine until they re-earn my trust.

    The short version of the story is that I bought a laptop from them and tried to get it fixed under warranty. They failed to fix all of the problems when I sent it back, and failed to note the problems as unfixed. When I got it back, outside of warranty, with the problems unfixed, I called Dell, and Dell refused to fix them, saying that it was out of warranty. They did, however, fix the problems they caused while it was being repaired. When I got it back from the second repair, there was an additional problem, a cracked access panel. It took a good half-hour of arguing to get them to replace the panel. I did finally get them to fix the original problem, but it took a sternly-worded letter to senior management to make it happen. That letter details several of the problems I've had with Dell over the years; it also contains the full version of this story.

    Short answer is that I have lost my faith in Dell, and until they prove themselves to me again, I won't buy their products, and I advise other people to do the same, no matter now nifty-cool they may be.

    --
    Moderate drunk! It's more fun that way!
  21. WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter by blenderfish · · Score: 2, Informative

    WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter

    That's a lot of adjectives, and a whole lot
    of pixel lovin'.

    1. Re:WUXGA = Wide Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which brings us to a good point: Why the fuck are we still using this naming system (answer to retorical question: marketing idiots)? How many people would know what size a WUXGA screen is? I wish they would just list the resolution--1920x1200--and be done with it.
      Unfortutaly, in 3 years time, we will probably be seeing screen with XWDSUXGA (Extra-wide Double Super Ultra eXtended Graphics Adapter) etc.

  22. Battery Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a screen that big and a video card that powerful, imagine the battery life that you'l

  23. Oh yeah. by Trelane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That was exactly my response, too.

    FWIW, an IBM salesdroid I talked with a few months ago said they might ship linux on their laptops this year. We'll see. Nobody's getting my money if I have to send a portion to Redmond, too.

    Just gimme a friggin' laptop without Windows on it! [OK, at a reasonable price, Apple-boy.

    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  24. *insert Apple comparison here* by hexdcml · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Crikey, at that price, I might as well save up to get either a 17" PowerBook or get the 15" now.. both are way thinner, lighter and better looking. I think no discussion about notebooks is complete without a comparison to Apple notebooks and the obligatory Mac Vs. PC debate. However, I'd just like to point out that their [Apple's] notebooks are just *that* much better (IMHO) than anything that's on the market. Dell and co should take Sony's stand and actually try to build a)Fully featured notebooks b)Pay attention to asthetics c)light and portable enough to be actually used as a mobile computer. *start rant* I take my iBook everywhere with me and much to PC notebook owners, I don't feel it a hassel to open it up just to check on a date on my iCal or catch up on work anywhere. OS X's instant on makes it as if I'm using a palm top.. unlike XP's startup from sleep. It's those 20 seconds or so that puts people off from starting their computer *end rant* I took a look at the "bottom" of the Dell on the website and noted all the fugly holes, ventelatiion, battery compartments, compulsory Windows stickers and other bloat. Why can't they just keep it simple??

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
  25. For all of you who say Apple is too much $$... by justMichael · · Score: 5, Informative

    And are drooling about this thing.

    I speced one as close as I could to my 1GHz TiBook and it was the same price and the Dell did not include a SuperDrive equivalent.

    So considering that the keyboard/mouse thingy has been replaced twice in my Dell Inspiron in 18 months, I think I will stick with my TiBook.

    Looks like a nice machine other than the fact that I have seen too many Dell portables fall apart.

  26. Do they call you the customizer? by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks for the 'news', but I'm not in the market for a laptop right now.

    And if I was, I'd have found this information myself.

    BTW, I'm trying to sell an old waterbed. Do you mind if I stick a flyer up on the homepage? Thanks.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  27. Thinkpad by NetJunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a Thinkpad T30 with their 1400x1050 14" screen and LOVE it. It's enough room for two side by side pages or a web browser and a couple of IM windows. It's not real heavy and has been a serious workhorse. It's crashed once in the last 4 months, and that was due to new ATI drivers (that weren't official).

  28. compare the pics... by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Compare these two photos:
    Inspiron 8500
    PowerBook G4

    I know, I know... it's just the bottom of the machine, but you gotta love style.

  29. Not quite by BoomerSooner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The resolution is 1900x1200 which beats the hell out of 1440x900 not to mention Apple crippled their laptops by switching to the OLD Geforce 4 Go 420 which is like the POS Geforce 4 MX. The ATI was better. Now if the new 15" comes with a nVidia Geforce 4 Go 4200 w/128MB I'll buy it. Otherwise I may hold off completely.

    I'm a huge apple fan but some of the most critical things I need to do for my company are either not available for Mac or are exponentially more expensive. BTW I develop software for Linux (2.2+), Windows (win32), Mac (OS X) and Solaris (7+). I have seen the 17" AlBooks at the Apple Store and while impressive it doesn't do much more for me than the old 15.2. If the 15.4 comes available for a decent price (see note) I'll get one as soon as they are available (not the lovely preannouncements Apple has been giving). Otherwise, I'll just get an old TiBook 1GHz for 2550 or so.

    Note: the Dell with 2.4GHz proc, 512MB 1 DIMM, GF4 4200, 60GB, 1920x1200, Extra Battery, ... is still only $3000 compared to apples $3300 for the 17" AlBook.

  30. Re:Seems heavy by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

    About the only significant difference I see is the resolution - the Dell screen, while smaller, has a resolution of 1920x1200. The Apple screen is "only" 1440x900. This is a signficant difference in resolutions, and may partially explain the weight difference. More likely, though, it's simply case materials.

    Of course, the Apple PowerBook G4 17" is $3299. Base (which includes a lot). A comparably configured Dell Inspiron 8500 (upgrade HD to 60GB, video to GF4Go, WUXGA video, 2 GHz CPU) is only $2657. And the Dell has a faster CPU (the 1 GHz G4 isn't going to beat a 2 GHz P4M in most tasks), more resolution (albeit a smaller screen), and a much, much longer standard warranty (3 years vs 1 year).

    Oh, and yes, the Inspiron 8500 has 802.11b/g, standard. I don't think it has Bluetooth (the Powerbook does), but both have Gigabit ethernet and built-in modems. Both have CD-RW/DVD-R's, and half a gig of memory (upgradable on both). They're really pretty comparable as far as hardware goes. Which software you prefer is obviously up to you.

    The Apple is lighter and (mostly) smaller. About the biggest difference is the height - 1" vs 1.5" is pretty major. The Apple is an inch wider, but that's probably not a big deal to most people.

  31. $3,277 by xaoslaad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, for a Geoforce4 4200 Go with 64MB RAM, a 2.4 GHz processor, and 1 GB RAM using 2 DIMMS, I managed to run the price up to $3,277..........

    Now I can get a Shuttle SB51G case for ~325, a 3.06 GHz P4 for $548, 2x512MB DIMMS for $88 [total], and a Built by ATI Radeon 9700 Pro for $320, total = 1281.... mind you I still need HDD, Display, and CD-ROM drive, but can I manage to rack up another 2K for that? Especially if upgrading and using my old CD-ROM, Display, and HDD???

    Don't get me wrong, I love Dell; I think they typically make superior PC's/Servers&Notebooks. But, is portability at the sake of performance, and that whopping price tag worth it???

  32. WUGXA? by frostfreek · · Score: 3, Funny

    "notebook with a WUXGA screen"
    Call me back when you have an Awooogah screen.
    I want to use it on my submarine.

  33. Re:Seems heavy by Atzanteol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell: Weight: 6.9 lbs. (2.96 kg) with travel module, battery and Harddrive.

    Apple: Weight: 6.8 pounds (3.1 kg) with battery and optical drive installed.

    Interesting trick. The Apple weighs more if you use metric measurements!

    --
    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

    - Charles Darwin
  34. Re:Neat and cool, but . . .BUT what will it take by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Short answer is that I have lost my faith in Dell, and until they prove themselves to me again, I won't buy their products, and I advise other people to do the same, no matter now nifty-cool they may be.

    And just how do they prove themselves to you again if you won't deal with them?

    I note that we have 5 Dells in our immediate family, including the 5 year old Dimension I'm typing this on. I've also worked closely with another dozen, and never had any problem with Dell service or support. I submit that your experience is not universal to all Dell owners.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  35. Cut the FUD. (I also own an 8200) by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    And go update your drivers. You're obviously NOT running the latest ones.

    My dad had bluescreen problems with his I8000 and obtained new drivers from *Windows Update* of all places. This was months ago.

    I was using the latest Dell drivers from their website with no problems whatsoever. I don't think my 8200 has ever bluescreened even once.

    And if you bothered to do ANY research at all, you would've found the D-Force (and related) modified INFs that are regularly maintained so that you can use your latest Detonator release with "Go" series of GeForces. Yes, I'm running the 41.09 Detonator release on my 8200 with full functionality.

    BTW, Dell has some excellent user-to-user support forums if you go to their support website.

    Oh yeah, and it runs Linux beautifully too.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  36. A laptop with wuxia? by Randolpho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool!

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  37. So when do we get widescreen desktop monitors? by hirschma · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Outside of the one that SGI released a few years ago, there have been no widescreen tubes or panels for the PC (perhaps some very high-end models).

    Widescreen is nice. The Mac world proves that.

    So, why aren't the PC makers and monitor vendors come out with 16:9 displays and give everyone a reason to upgrade?

    jonathan

  38. Is it me or... by Monofilament · · Score: 4, Interesting

    are dell laptops just looking worse and worse. I'm not talking about features.. I'm talking about physical looks. they've release 3 different laptops recently of varying economics, they all look the same.. and they all are ugly as SIN!

    At least teh old inspirions.. standard black.. with the wildly overprice clip on color pads.. were neutral looking. It was black.. it went with anything. Now these things area light blue and odd shade of gray. Seems like colors you'd have as baby-shower decorations than on a laptop.

    Laptops are a fashion statement.. if your gonna be lugging one into your local starbucks it better not be an eye-sore. I looks like they cut the side off some old computer cases and formed them to a laptop case.

    The laptop I will get next will need to be power efficient and powerful(not so concerned about weight).. But if I have to pick i'll choose mroe power than power efficiency. Thats why i've got hopes for Centrino.. or some variant with the Pent-M ..

    This laptop is neither of my requirements.. and its an ugly monster to-boot

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
  39. Re:1920x1200 or 1600x1200? by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both cards actually support 2048x1536. Dell just didn't have a screen that did this on a laptop before now. It's a new product, give them time. =)

    --
    -----------------------------------------
    Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
  40. Dell equipment is cheap (in the nasty sense) by EvilMike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had the misfortune to have two Dell laptops (Inspiron 7000 back in '99, Latitude C840 presently). They were not my choice - work machines. Both have been heavy, cheaply made junk. The Inspiron had multiple hardware repairs before I got rid of it (screen failure, memory, casing). The current Latitude is only 5 months old and the hard drive crapped out last week. It takes the patience of Job to deal with Dell Support, particularly when you are an IT professional and you already know what is wrong! It only took 3 days to argue the drive replacement out of them.

    Also I'm not sure why Dell bother putting Nvidia graphics adapters in these 'high-end' laptops. Check out the most recent update available for the Geforce 4 440 Go drivers for the Lat C840 (v28.35 anyone?).
  41. same here! by phoxix · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I love my T30. This thing rocks! Its especially works well for linux users being that 99% of this laptop works just dandy with linux.

    Sunny Dubey

  42. Umm... No thanks by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sorry, but that high of a resolution on a 15in monitor seems kind of idiotic to me. Everything would be tini-tiny, it would only be good for watching DVDs.

    Dell should of produced a 17in 1440-900 laptop like Apple. That'd be a hell of a lot cooler.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  43. Re:Can you buy this today? by spideyct · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can place orders online today:
    http://www.dell.com/us/en/dhs/products/mod el_inspn _inspn_8500.htm

    But they show the "build time" at 25 days (compared with 5 days for an 8200).

    So yes, you can buy this today. But you probably won't have it in your hands tomorrow.

  44. Re:The news is the screen... by Mignon · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with my ASUS. Three thumbs up.

    Damn, I have to do something about this dyslexia. I thought you said "I'm happier than a bishop in amsterdam with three thumbs up my ASS."

    It's going to be a while before I forget that thought.

  45. Uphill both ways in the snow by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny
    I love all the whining about the weight of the thing. The bag you carry it in will probably weigh as much or more.

    Oldmanrant
    I used to carry a Mac SE with a jerry-rigged hard drive home every night from work on the train. The damn thing was 35 pounds by the time it was in the bag.

    I was happy when we switched to the Compaq Portables. Happy, I tell you!

    Oh yeah, we ate sand.
    /Oldmanrant

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  46. Re:Seems heavy by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Apple weighs more if you use metric measurements!

    Soooo....., the possibilities are narrowed. Fired NASA engineers either go to work for Apple, or Dell.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  47. Bigger fonts? by moz25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would it help to set the fonts bigger or isn't that an option?

    1. Re:Bigger fonts? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Would it help to set the fonts bigger or isn't that an option?"

      Yeah, you can. Although my experience with Win2k (my laptop is XP and they MIGHT have fixed that) is that changing the font size can screw things up, especially web browsing. I've noticed that setting the fonts to larger can mangle table sizes on websites and break them. I've also noticed that text doesn't always fit in its buttons like the 'submit' button.

      Also for me in particular, this is a problem because I bought my laptop to run Lightwave. The buttons on it are fixed-width fonts, and they do not respond to fonts designated by the Windows theme. I cannot change the font on it that I know of. So for me (I doubt a significant amount of people have this laptop and run Lightwave on it...) that's not an option.

      Things might be different in XP, but I wouldn't count on it. Either the text will be the wrong size and break the page, or it'll be too small, thus defeating the purpose of it. Fortunately, I use Opera and it has a true magnification button instead of changing the font size.

    2. Re:Bigger fonts? by jbolden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Mozilla for this. I.E.'s font resizing is terrible.

  48. A Titanium PowerBook is CHEAPER by st.+jude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, it's a 15.2 instead of a 15.4 (at least until the update, expected in the next couple of weeks), but check out this side-by-side comparison: If you configure a 15 inch PowerBook with the best processor (1GHz) and make the components match as much as possible: Apple Titanium PowerBook: 15.2 inch Widescreen Display (Max. Res. 1280x854, plenty for a screen this size!) 1GHz PowerPC G4 Processor 60GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) Wireless Networking (AirPort) 512 MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 w. 64MB DDR SDRAM Height: 1.0 inch (2.6 cm) Width: 13.4 inches (34.1 cm) Depth: 9.5 inches (24.1 cm) Weight: 5.4 pounds (2.45 kg) with battery and optical drive installed Price: $ 2,699.00 Dell Inspiration 8500: 15.4 inch Widescreen Display (Max. Res. 1920x1200) 2.4GHz Mobile Pentium 4 Processor 60GB Ultra ATA Hard Drive Combo Drive (DVD-ROM/CD-RW) Wireless Networking (802.11a/b) 512 MB DDR SDRAM - 1 DIMM nVidia GeForce 4 4200 Go w. 64MB DDR SDRAM Height: 1.52-inch (3.86 cm) Width: 14.22-inch (36.12 cm) Depth: 10.87-inch (27.61 cm) Weight: 6.9 lbs. (3.13 kg) with travel module, battery and Hard Drive Price: $ 2,927.00 Price difference: the thicker, taller, wider, HEAVIER, insanely hideous Dell costs $228 more. Sure, we could have another endless MHz myth discussion. But seriously, step back a second and just think about this. You can get the Mac for less than the Dell. Some of you may want to look out the window and check for porcine aviators.

  49. Limits of DVI-D by doormat · · Score: 2, Informative

    You cant go above 12x10 on a standards LCD because a stardard single DVI-D link can only supply that much information to the monitor. A dual DVI-D link could provide 1920x1200, but no videocards seem to implement dual DVI.

    See http://www.rell.com/pdfs/DSG_ssLCD-240t.pdf -- Maximum Digital Resolution: 1280x1024 @60Hz

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.