Slashdot Mirror


100mbps Fiber Service To Your Door

BitHive writes "With all the talk on /. about the last mile, it looks like people in Mason County, WA may get what I've wanted for years--a 100mbps fiber connection straight to their home. The ISP, DONOBi claims the personal account is 'unlimited,' but since they don't allow servers, and have a business account which is capped at 5Gb/month ($3/Gb addtl), I think we can guess at what their idea of 'unlimited' is. Their service offerings can be found here. Is anyone on this service or knows something they can report?"

32 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. $100 monthly point-to-point by davinciII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since I doubt the actual internet connection speed will be 100mbps, this seems like an amazing option for businesses with multiple locations in the city.

    Imagine a 100MBit connection between your offices for only $100 a month?

    1. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Did you see the 5GB cap?

      We suck 10GB a month down our cable modem, I'd hate to see what we do between offices.

      Can this new service carry voice+data?

    2. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by Bonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uhm, yeah, but $3 a GB overrun isn't exactly a lot.

      Think about it. If you have a gigabyte of traffic *every* day, every month, you're out about $100-$120 including the regular fee every month... not that bad for the kind of service these guys are offering.

      Frankly, I'd be a lot more concerned about the 'no servers' rule than the cost.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  2. Well... by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    The mail system was the best way to deliver high quality porn to your house, but now with this..

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  3. Hurrah! by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Funny

    Getting fiber to my door is cool, but when will they get it to my living room? I don't have a plug for my computer at the door :(

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  4. fiber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    i get enough fiber as it i...excuse me i have to go to the bathroom.

  5. Servers by nightsweat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How many popular sites have servers that could handle the load from a decent sized community of 100Mbps?

    Not complaining, just pointing out that YMMV.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Servers by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats what I was thinking. Really, the best use of this technology would be a medium-low end private server.

      I am perpetually frustrated by the consumer ISP's industry's belief that all their little users must be good little consumers and not actually use their service for anything but browsing the web and e-mail. I find that most ISP's don't even have functioning DNS servers, which means that most IRC servers (and similar old systems) will reject you from logging on.

      What bothers me most is the "no servers" policy. I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose. Also, what if I want to be more of a server then a user? Why can't I get a better system for uppipe and trade-off my download amount? All the standard gear (DSL, Cable) gets several megabits per second but peaks at 200kb/s. Why is it if I just want to run a medium-sized UT server I have to fork over for a "business" account? Your average leech will have about the same strain on their servers, and yet those of us who actually want to contribute to the internet have very few options as consumers, besides paying for corporate-level accounts that we dont want.

    2. Re:Servers by Shishak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose"

      You honestly think that $39.95/month 'pays' for a 100mbps Internet feed? The current going rate for el cheapo national ISPs is about $75/meg in 100 meg chunks so you are talking about $7500/month. Decent backbones (i.e. WCOM, Sprint, ATT ...) charge $200+/meg/month.

      This cost per meg doesn't even cover the loop to get the bandwidth to the ISP router. Forget about the cost of delivering the 100 meg to your house. Now assuming your ISP buys the cheap stuff ($75/meg) and is selling you 100 megs for $39.95/month they are overcommitting about 200:1. If you did use your full bandwidth you would piss off 199 other customers. At 200:1 they STILL aren't making a profit.

      If you actually paid for what you used I'm sure the providers would have no problem allowing you to use it.

      Get real people, the Internet is EXPENSIVE to operate and maintain. throw all the spammers in jail and the price would drop some I'm sure.

      --
      Now I hope and pray that I will But today I am still, just a bill
    3. Re:Servers by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that forking over for a business account here will cost you...exactly the same as the personal account.

      Translation: 'For $40/mo, you can have all the surfing, etc. you can handle, OR you can have all the servers and crap you want with a 5 GB/mo cap. If you choose option 2, we'll be happy to sell you more throughput at $3/GB.'

      So, I think they agree with you. IF you pay for your bandwidth, THEN you can use all you want. Otherwise, you're stuck with surfing really* fast.

      * Depending on site/route conditions, etc.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Servers by Algan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what? I would gladly pay $100 for a decent, reliable 1 meg up/down connection that won't restrict my usage in any way... problem is I don't know where to get it.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    5. Re:Servers by spicyjeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, USA laid fiber to the curb a few years back and provides reasonable transfer rates and pricing including some "allowing" servers. Check out some of the details here.

      At the time it was first being rolled out I was working for a small business in the town and oversaw the our connection, which was fiber to the door. Speeds on the town network were up to 100Mbps while anything outside the network was capped at 1.5Mbps for $50 a month.

    6. Re:Servers by Shagg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose"

      You honestly think that $39.95/month 'pays' for a 100mbps Internet feed? The current going rate for el cheapo national ISPs is about $75/meg in 100 meg chunks so you are talking about $7500/month. Decent backbones (i.e. WCOM, Sprint, ATT ...) charge $200+/meg/month.

      This cost per meg doesn't even cover the loop to get the bandwidth to the ISP router. Forget about the cost of delivering the 100 meg to your house. Now assuming your ISP buys the cheap stuff ($75/meg) and is selling you 100 megs for $39.95/month they are overcommitting about 200:1. If you did use your full bandwidth you would piss off 199 other customers. At 200:1 they STILL aren't making a profit.


      All of the above is absolutely true, but it has nothing to do with not allowing users to run their own servers. If a user is hogging a significant amount of bandwidth and causing degredations in service to others, then I agree that the ISP should charge them more or cap their usage. But again, that has nothing to do with running servers. You can just as easily hog the bandwidth downloading data as you can serving data.

      What you decide to do with your share of the bandwidth feed should be entirely up to you. Do they really believe that running your own secure mail server with 5 email addresses, or running a web server so that Grandma can see pictures of her grandkids online, is going to use more bandwidth than users who download ISOs and/or porn all day long? The policy and reasons for that policy as stated make no sense.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  6. First (?) by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    5Gb per month? If they really are talking about gigabits and not gigabytes, then that is somewhat ridiculous. Oh boy, I can download one CD image (of a piece of software I already have, of course) per month. What a great service. --n

    1. Re:First (?) by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Funny

      5Gb per month? If they really are talking about gigabits and not gigabytes, then that is somewhat ridiculous. Oh boy, I can download one CD image (of a piece of software I already have, of course) per month. What a great service.

      Why do that when you can download one that you don't already have?

  7. The only reason Mason Cty. can do this by iowagary · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in western washington and I just had a cisco rep in here talking about something vaguely related but he told us the only reason they can afford this in Mason County is because they own 3 hydro dams and have no idea what to do with all the money they are making, so they decided to pull fiber to every house. They really don't expect to ever recover the investment. Almost makes you want to move though...

    1. Re:The only reason Mason Cty. can do this by Diskord · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is dead wrong. Mason County does not have any Hydro generation at all. The Cisco rep may have been thinking of Grant County in Washington, which has 3 Hydroelectric dams. They are also doing a fiber to the home project as well.

  8. Their DSL prices are higher? by Brento · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Somehow I've gotta wonder when their DSL prices are more expensive than their fiber prices. Something's gotta be amiss.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Their DSL prices are higher? by programR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Our DSL prices are higher than our Fiber prices because the phone company makes those charges higher....

      We provide the best prices we can on all of the different media available. DSL is more expensive to us, but Fiber is only available in certain areas... There are petitions for customers to sign to try and help get Fiber into more areas, but it really comes down to what the Public Utility District for that county is willing to foot the bill for.

      We are providing IP service over the PUD network of Fiber optics. Customers also have the ability to have On-Demand video provided over the pipe & other services like telephony. Those are currently outside the realm of what DONOBi offers, but we are working with the different PUDs in the areas we can to provide all of those services to our customers.

      --
      Jeff Wood < jwood [at] donobi [dot] com >
      Manager of Hosting & Development Services
      DONOBi
  9. Minor Info by Sedennial · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has actually been in place for some time and there are a couple of other ISP's in Mason offering fibre connectivity via the open access network, but full scale rollout has been slowed down for a number of reasons. Some political and some financial. Currently they are reviewing a wireless solution for lastmile due to unexpectedly high costs for lastmile fiber solution. Last commisioners meeting I went to had some interesting discussion taking place regarding alternative solutions for last-mile.

    Real per customer business costs far exceed various estimates due to the fact that to sign up customer X at the end of the street you have to essentially lay out fiber for EVERY home between your splice point and customer X. And unless every one of those customers signs up, you may have just expended $15k or more (since they Mason is doing an underground install not poletop) for one customer.

  10. I smell a lawsuit from the baby bells by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought only the baby bells had rights to lay out lines? At least thats what I hear from slashdotters who bicker about what de-regulation would do to the isp industry. Southern bell for example says if the isp's do not like it tough, they can lay out there own lines. Interestingly the government has specific contracts to the baby bells from the old bell laboratories to only use them and no one else when digging up public property like roads and open land.

    My guess is they will try to stop this isp or actually bill them through the roof since they do not want anyone else to play ball. I find it unlikely for the second to be true since more supply = less demand for their bussiness dsl and T1 service.

  11. Last mile by fishybell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As far as being a good last mile solution, it fares well, mainly because of symmetric speeds. Of course the last mile is not where you're going to see the speed bottleneck, it's at both the ISP and the webserver/etc that you're connecting to.

    What this will be exceptional for is people who have computers at various points in the Donobi network. Here are the people who will gain the most: company with multiple office locations, people who's company let's them work from home (VPN, VNC, etc), and of course, gamers. Gaming within the network will be supreme.

    I currently have Comcast. The connection can be flaky at times (supposedly because I am doing it wrong), but the speeds are incredible. I love having a 25-50 ping on the games I play, but when one of my room mates is uploading files (I'm talking to you Kai) on WinMx my ping goes down the tube fast (400 anyone?). I would love my 2.5 mbps down just as much as the next guy, but I would trade my soul just to get a synchronous speed even as low as 768 kbps (256 now). Now 100 mbps? that's fast, no matter what the other problems (pay for downloads beyond 5gb, etc).

    --
    ><));>
  12. Fraud? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me nuts, but isn't advertising something as "unlimited" when it's not, generally considered fraud? I don't care if it's really x amount of bandwidth + no servers, blah, blah, blah, but the company can't really advertise "unlimited" if it's not. A real "unlimited" pipe to the Net at xxGig/S is called a T-1, or greater. Those are generally $1500/month.

  13. We don't ever learn, do we? by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are a couple of fundamental problems with 100 mbit fiber to the door. First, the cost. With real, gauranteed bandwidth costing anywhere from up to $1,000 per megabit (depending on the quality of the provider), that means that they are going to have to oversell their bandwidth like *crazy* to try and make any profit. With a 100 mbit connection, it only takes a very small number of kiddies with P2P clients to use enough bandwidth to make the entire project unprofitable. Five people using an average of 50 mbits/second each could potentially cost the company over a hundred thousand dollars per month. That means that they'd need a minimum of 2,500 customers just to break even.

    The second problem is the routing/switching. Let's say that they signed up those 2,500 people on the service. If even one tenth of them actually tried to use even half of their bandwidth at the same time, you're looking at 12 gigabits per second, which is more than an OC192 can handle.

    Yep, there are some serious problems here. The kind of problems that they will only overcome by one or more of the following:

    • capping bandwidth
    • overselling like mad, effectively capping bandwidth
    • charging a lot


    It looks like it will still be as good (or better) than DSL, but don't cling to the hopes of actually using 100 mbits.

    On the other hand, I *have* been in places where one person could actually use 100 mbits. I watched a single download from Microsoft coming along at 11 megabytes/second - 88 megabits/second. Of course, the place had a barely-used OC3.

    steve
    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:We don't ever learn, do we? by Diskord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Our Fiber connection comes from NoaNet (www.noanet.com) and uses the existing BPA (Bonneville Power Administration) infrastructure. The pricing we recieve is based on 95th percentile billing, so you aren't charged on what your actual use is, but on what your average use is.

      Most end customers use very little bandwidth, but then burst when they are downloading a large file, demo, etc...

      Currently we have no plans to clamp or cap as you refer to it bandwidth. We do charge more as your usage increases, but at under $2 a GB, it is fairly reasonable.

  14. Easy by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Informative

    That would be excellent for me. My Internet habits entirely consist of...

    * Checking Slashdot and a few other discussion boards
    * Checking my e-mail
    * Chatting on Jabber, AIM and MSN
    * Updating my website
    * Occasionally downloading Redhat's software updates
    * Sometimes playing streaming music (but not very often)

    That could easily be les than 5Gb/month.

  15. Donobi is just the ISP by Diskord · · Score: 3, Informative

    Juyst to clarify, Donobi is just one of many ISP's on our fiber network. The Fiber itself is being laid by Mason County PUD3.

    The PUD website is http://www.masonpud3.org

    There you can find a complete list of retailers, and more information on the Fiber project.

  16. From The TOS by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "In any case, you will be disconnected after approximately 8 hours of continuous connect time"

    This isn't something i expect/want from a fibre optic line, neither is:

    We expect that you will promptly disconnect your modem from our dialup facility when you are not actively using the connection. If we discover that your system is connected to DONOBi but idle (not sending or receiving data) we may disconnect you.
    http://www.donobi.com/terms_of_service.php

  17. Yeah, great... by hafree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first thing I do when I turn on my computer is tune into internet radio, usually a 128kbps mp3 stream for around 4 hours a day. At that rate, I'd use up my 3GB quota before the month was half over, and that doesn't even include browsing the web, sending and receiving e-mail, or downloading files. I'll stick with cable until they can figure out a better definition for "unlimited".

    1. Re:Yeah, great... by matastas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read. The damned. Web site.

      If you don't want the business account, you don't have to worry about that. You sacrifice the ability to use server. This is what we in the Real World call 'give and take.' And it comes with the territory of paying a lower price for a service.

  18. Product differentiation by unicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have an obvious, absolute rule to no servers. They do want to drive customers to the "business" accounts. BUT If you actually look at their page, the business accounts are the same price as the residential ones. The difference being that business accounts have a bandwidth cap.

    So you can choose what service best suits your needs. Unlimited bandwidth, geared at downstream only. Or be able to run servers as well, but be limited in the amount of "free" bandwidth you get.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  19. Former Fiber Customer by hippoart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to live in Mason County in Allyn. The 100mb fiber was the only option for Internet Connection other than dial-up. I could get digital cable but not cable modem for some dumb reason. So I paid PUD $250 to install the line from pole on street to side of my house. Donobi wanted an additional $150 or so for setup as well - I told them I could do it myself for free. After much wrangling I got out of that charge. I was only charged $39.99 a month but the problem was that the performance was extremely poor. I lived there about 6 months - had 3 service outages, and consistently low performance. The line ranked below a 256K DSL line on most tests. Donobi technically support was completely useless. I think we were only 1 of 3 or 4 customers that had this due to the high install fee. So the technical support staff was very unfamiliar with the fact that Donobi even offered fiber, much less how to troubleshoot any problems. The downloads were unlimited but again with crappy performance who cares. I have since moved into Seattle and am much happier with my DSL from Speakeasy.net