Slashdot Mirror


100mbps Fiber Service To Your Door

BitHive writes "With all the talk on /. about the last mile, it looks like people in Mason County, WA may get what I've wanted for years--a 100mbps fiber connection straight to their home. The ISP, DONOBi claims the personal account is 'unlimited,' but since they don't allow servers, and have a business account which is capped at 5Gb/month ($3/Gb addtl), I think we can guess at what their idea of 'unlimited' is. Their service offerings can be found here. Is anyone on this service or knows something they can report?"

65 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. $100 monthly point-to-point by davinciII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since I doubt the actual internet connection speed will be 100mbps, this seems like an amazing option for businesses with multiple locations in the city.

    Imagine a 100MBit connection between your offices for only $100 a month?

    1. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Did you see the 5GB cap?

      We suck 10GB a month down our cable modem, I'd hate to see what we do between offices.

      Can this new service carry voice+data?

    2. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by Bonker · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uhm, yeah, but $3 a GB overrun isn't exactly a lot.

      Think about it. If you have a gigabyte of traffic *every* day, every month, you're out about $100-$120 including the regular fee every month... not that bad for the kind of service these guys are offering.

      Frankly, I'd be a lot more concerned about the 'no servers' rule than the cost.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    3. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article doesn't make this very clear IMO - the personal account is unlimited bandwidth but not for server use. The business account has unlimited uses (web servers, internet radio, etc.) but limited bandwidth (5GB/Month + $3 per GB thereafter).

      As the parent post said, after paying for the extra $3 per gig it's still a very reasonable price for 100Mbit fiber and you CAN run a server on the paid bandwidth package.

    4. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by crandall · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know I'm jumping on this one a little late, but I have a 100mbit fiber connection to my apartment, and it only costs me 50$CAN per month. That's about 32$ to you americans.

      It's unlimited, they let me run servers and whatever else I want. It's a pipe set up for the condo complex I live in, in downtown Toronto.

      Name your favorite distro, and I can download it in a minute or two. If their pipe is big enough.

    5. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Before you all get excited over stuff like this, I have to tell you that the biggest business in Mason County is the QFC grocery store in the middle of town, an possibly the all but-shut-down-by-tree-huggers sawmill. This is no silicon B-To-B mecha. It's a cow town with 2 roads in and 2 out. The big passtime for kids here is not hacking, it's painting thier high school name on the train bridge.

      I tried to picture a business with 'multiple locations in the city' and I almost spilled my soda laughing. ;-)

    6. Re:$100 monthly point-to-point by Idaho · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously people shouldn't be allowed to really use that 100 MBit constantly (it's just the top speed, not the avg. throughput).

      But...a 5 GB cap? We sometimes download that within a day using our slow 512/64 cable modem! Not all the time, ofcourse, but I think 500 MB - 1 GB on average a day (sharing the connection with a few people) is not extreme...is it?

      Imagine having 100 MBit and then getting a DDoS, or just installing some new Linux distro from FTP...at 100 MBit, you can reach that monthly 5 GB limit in just over 8 minutes!

      I think something like 100 GB/month would be a lot more reasonable (though still pretty much on the low side). 250 GB would be great...

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
  2. Well... by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 4, Funny

    The mail system was the best way to deliver high quality porn to your house, but now with this..

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Well... by kesuki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The post office still is.
      Where else can you sent 4.7 GB of porn for the cost of a stamp? that's 37.6 Gbit per 37 cents. $3 for 1 gigabit is not nearly as cost effective. Over 300 times more expensive than the post office, True, you can send a CD-rom in a minute with 100mbit/second and the post office has a latency issue of usually 2-3 days.
      I really wonder if broadband technology can ever get to a point where it's cheaper than post for sending porn/warez/etc...

      BTW, yes, you can send a DVD-r for the one ounce postage rate, as long as it complies with postal regulations when it's shipped. the weight of a single optical disk in a basic optical disc mailer is exactly one ounce, and complies with postal regulations. Of course it's not as well protetected, and could become fragmented or delaminated in shipping...

      I'm willing to bet they force any high bandwith users over to the capped limit, because really how do they prove that you are or aren't running a server? or what a server is? Isn't gnutella really based on a http server? does that mean you'll get switched over to capped bandwith if you go on gnutella and they detect a lot of http traffic?

      and the 5 gbit cap isn't very much at all.. that's only a single 650 MBbyte CD-rom. $18 a minute for internet access... 50 seconds a month provided and we call that cheap.. (it is 100mbit internet access afterall.)

      Now the point to point link deal is really good, because you just pay the flat $100 a month, no per bandwith charges, because you're running over a dedicated private link and the data isn't going over the internet.
      Speaking as an experienced cable mode user, 8 gb per month is nothing at all to utilize... that's without even trying. and under a restrictive under 1 megabit downstream cap.
      At $112 per DVD I don't think the fact that you can get one in under 7 minutes makes up for it.
      hmm... 37 cents? or $112? nope, the post office STILL wins hands down.

  3. Hurrah! by JanusFury · · Score: 5, Funny

    Getting fiber to my door is cool, but when will they get it to my living room? I don't have a plug for my computer at the door :(

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
  4. fiber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    i get enough fiber as it i...excuse me i have to go to the bathroom.

  5. Servers by nightsweat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How many popular sites have servers that could handle the load from a decent sized community of 100Mbps?

    Not complaining, just pointing out that YMMV.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Servers by Pxtl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thats what I was thinking. Really, the best use of this technology would be a medium-low end private server.

      I am perpetually frustrated by the consumer ISP's industry's belief that all their little users must be good little consumers and not actually use their service for anything but browsing the web and e-mail. I find that most ISP's don't even have functioning DNS servers, which means that most IRC servers (and similar old systems) will reject you from logging on.

      What bothers me most is the "no servers" policy. I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose. Also, what if I want to be more of a server then a user? Why can't I get a better system for uppipe and trade-off my download amount? All the standard gear (DSL, Cable) gets several megabits per second but peaks at 200kb/s. Why is it if I just want to run a medium-sized UT server I have to fork over for a "business" account? Your average leech will have about the same strain on their servers, and yet those of us who actually want to contribute to the internet have very few options as consumers, besides paying for corporate-level accounts that we dont want.

    2. Re:Servers by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Funny

      "ISP's industry's belief that all their little users must be good little consumers and not actually use their service for anything but browsing the web and e-mail."

      Hmmm, kind of interesting that isp's also are in the webserving bussiness. Whats that Pxtl? You want your own server? Sure, for an extra $30 a month we can give you a website with 30 megs of disk space.

    3. Re:Servers by Shishak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose"

      You honestly think that $39.95/month 'pays' for a 100mbps Internet feed? The current going rate for el cheapo national ISPs is about $75/meg in 100 meg chunks so you are talking about $7500/month. Decent backbones (i.e. WCOM, Sprint, ATT ...) charge $200+/meg/month.

      This cost per meg doesn't even cover the loop to get the bandwidth to the ISP router. Forget about the cost of delivering the 100 meg to your house. Now assuming your ISP buys the cheap stuff ($75/meg) and is selling you 100 megs for $39.95/month they are overcommitting about 200:1. If you did use your full bandwidth you would piss off 199 other customers. At 200:1 they STILL aren't making a profit.

      If you actually paid for what you used I'm sure the providers would have no problem allowing you to use it.

      Get real people, the Internet is EXPENSIVE to operate and maintain. throw all the spammers in jail and the price would drop some I'm sure.

      --
      Now I hope and pray that I will But today I am still, just a bill
    4. Re:Servers by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note that forking over for a business account here will cost you...exactly the same as the personal account.

      Translation: 'For $40/mo, you can have all the surfing, etc. you can handle, OR you can have all the servers and crap you want with a 5 GB/mo cap. If you choose option 2, we'll be happy to sell you more throughput at $3/GB.'

      So, I think they agree with you. IF you pay for your bandwidth, THEN you can use all you want. Otherwise, you're stuck with surfing really* fast.

      * Depending on site/route conditions, etc.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    5. Re:Servers by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Informative

      You honestly think that $39.95/month 'pays' for a 100mbps Internet feed? The current going rate for el cheapo national ISPs is about $75/meg in 100 meg chunks so you are talking about $7500/month. Decent backbones (i.e. WCOM, Sprint, ATT ...) charge $200+/meg/month.

      You are officially outdated here. This is not 1992. Bandwidth is plentiful, and cheap. The pipes are bigger, maintenance costs are the same. I have personally priced out getting my own trunk and I can gaurantee you that it isn't that much through Sprint. Try about $350 for a dedicated T1 (not counting telco charges) with no bandwidth cap. In case you failed to noticed, backbones transfer huge amounts of data, and are no where near capacity.

      I can get 300GB of bandwidth at a datacenter for $100/mo.

      Now, assuming the fiber to the home is similar to Ashland, Oregons product it's a large ethernet network over the city. It has several ISPs that relay the traffic to the fiber backbone.

      Get real people, the Internet is EXPENSIVE to operate and maintain. throw all the spammers in jail and the price would drop some I'm sure.

      Wow. Could you please just disconnect yourself, now. You are about as clueless as they come. You are the same type of people who were ranting about the Skyline being brought to the US market and costing over $60K because that's what it costs to buy one in Japan, ship it over, switch the steering wheel to the left side, pay taxes on it, and perform the rest of the street legal modifications.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:Servers by Algan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what? I would gladly pay $100 for a decent, reliable 1 meg up/down connection that won't restrict my usage in any way... problem is I don't know where to get it.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    7. Re:Servers by spicyjeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, USA laid fiber to the curb a few years back and provides reasonable transfer rates and pricing including some "allowing" servers. Check out some of the details here.

      At the time it was first being rolled out I was working for a small business in the town and oversaw the our connection, which was fiber to the door. Speeds on the town network were up to 100Mbps while anything outside the network was capped at 1.5Mbps for $50 a month.

    8. Re:Servers by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've posted this before. If I were to start a DSL ISP, here's the pricing structure I'd use, for both residential and business use (extra support and bandwidth guarantees would cost extra, and most certainly be purchased by businesses). No restrictions (beyond banning DoS attacks (including being a bot), spam, open relaying, and such; if you are disconnected for those activities, you owe $250) and no ports are blocked. We'll even adjust reverse DNS if you ask, at no charge.

      • Tier One: 192kbps down, 48kbps up; unlimited downloads, 50MB/month uploads (uploads to hosts not going through our border routers are unlimited). Base price: $29/month. Extra uploads: $10/50MB or portion thereof. 192kbps SDSL for $39/month. Priority routing for an extra $10/month.
      • Tier Two: 768kbps down, 256kbps up; 500MB/month uploads. Base price: $49/month. Extra uploads: $15/500MB or portion thereof. 768kbps SDSL for $65/month. Priority routing: $10/month.
      • Tier Three: 1536kbps down, 768kbps up; 2GB/month uploads. Base price: $89/month. Extra uploads: $15/GB or portion thereof. 1536kbps SDSL for $115/month. Priority routing: $15/month.
      • Tier Four: 3072kbps down, 2048kbps up; 5GB/month uploads. Base prices: $169/month. Extra uploads: $10/GB or portion thereof. 3072kbps SDSL for $225/month. Priority routing: $30/month.
    9. Re:Servers by Shagg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I am paying for the bandwidth - why cant I use it as I choose"

      You honestly think that $39.95/month 'pays' for a 100mbps Internet feed? The current going rate for el cheapo national ISPs is about $75/meg in 100 meg chunks so you are talking about $7500/month. Decent backbones (i.e. WCOM, Sprint, ATT ...) charge $200+/meg/month.

      This cost per meg doesn't even cover the loop to get the bandwidth to the ISP router. Forget about the cost of delivering the 100 meg to your house. Now assuming your ISP buys the cheap stuff ($75/meg) and is selling you 100 megs for $39.95/month they are overcommitting about 200:1. If you did use your full bandwidth you would piss off 199 other customers. At 200:1 they STILL aren't making a profit.


      All of the above is absolutely true, but it has nothing to do with not allowing users to run their own servers. If a user is hogging a significant amount of bandwidth and causing degredations in service to others, then I agree that the ISP should charge them more or cap their usage. But again, that has nothing to do with running servers. You can just as easily hog the bandwidth downloading data as you can serving data.

      What you decide to do with your share of the bandwidth feed should be entirely up to you. Do they really believe that running your own secure mail server with 5 email addresses, or running a web server so that Grandma can see pictures of her grandkids online, is going to use more bandwidth than users who download ISOs and/or porn all day long? The policy and reasons for that policy as stated make no sense.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    10. Re:Servers by andrew_0812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. My cable access which just 2 months ago was consistantly 1.4 - 2.0 MB is now running about 600KB because of people sitting at home running Kazaa all day long. Why should the ISP happily allow that, but I risk loosing my only source of broadband access if I decide to have a FTP server so that I might access my home network from work? How much traffic will that cause? Gimme a break.

    11. Re:Servers by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wha? I pay $150 for a quarter rack of space, and $200 per 256kbits/sec ($700 for a full T1) of pipe.
      Granted, there is a premium b/c it is at a hosting facility on eight different backbones with garunteed 100% uptime (where they define 'up' as less than 100% packet loss, but in reality it is always up).


      I'm talking about T1s to a location, not in a datacenter. I'm not sure what you mean though, if you are at a datacenter you should be riding on their pipes to the backbones, and a T1 should never be mentioned. I pay $200/mo for a leased server at 10MBs at Rackspace, and will probably switch to a better deal soon.

      Are you saying I got a raw deal? The premium name-brand folks wanted $800+ for the same thing (asking price, of course, not what they would really settle for).

      The best prices you can get if you are just looking for coloc space is to find a datacenter and use them directly. HE.net is a great one, and is fairly reasonable in what you can get, if buying in larger quantities.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    12. Re:Servers by Xerithane · · Score: 2, Informative

      T1=1.5Mbps, $350/1.5 = $233 per Mbps, while he was quoting $75/Mbps-$200Mbps!

      Yeah, I really botched writing it. T1s are not commonly used anymore because they are too expensive. DSL prices (redundant DSL lines or sDSL) are much more effective for businesses. When latency isn't an issue, even Satellite is cheaper for what you get.

      My point was that T1s aren't what are being used anymore, so bandwidth isn't that expensive. I completely missed writing that.

      Calling someone as clueless as they come, when you don't even understand how bandwidth is priced, is pretty damn silly.

      No... I'm just illiterate.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  6. First (?) by neuro.slug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    5Gb per month? If they really are talking about gigabits and not gigabytes, then that is somewhat ridiculous. Oh boy, I can download one CD image (of a piece of software I already have, of course) per month. What a great service. --n

    1. Re:First (?) by IAR80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if this are Gigabytes it is still very litlle! Actually on a true 100Mbps connection you can teoretically dowload 5GB in less than 7 minutes.

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    2. Re:First (?) by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Funny

      5Gb per month? If they really are talking about gigabits and not gigabytes, then that is somewhat ridiculous. Oh boy, I can download one CD image (of a piece of software I already have, of course) per month. What a great service.

      Why do that when you can download one that you don't already have?

  7. The only reason Mason Cty. can do this by iowagary · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work in western washington and I just had a cisco rep in here talking about something vaguely related but he told us the only reason they can afford this in Mason County is because they own 3 hydro dams and have no idea what to do with all the money they are making, so they decided to pull fiber to every house. They really don't expect to ever recover the investment. Almost makes you want to move though...

    1. Re:The only reason Mason Cty. can do this by Diskord · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is dead wrong. Mason County does not have any Hydro generation at all. The Cisco rep may have been thinking of Grant County in Washington, which has 3 Hydroelectric dams. They are also doing a fiber to the home project as well.

    2. Re:The only reason Mason Cty. can do this by L-Train8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mason County PUD started laying a fiber backbone in 1998 to enhance control of their power distribution grid and then to aid in meter reading. The fiber-to-your-door is only available in the most populous areas of Mason county, that is, the cities of Shelton, Allyn, Belfair, and Lake Limerick. Most of Mason county does not have access to fiber.

      My grandfather was a commisioner for PUD3 for almost 20 years, and your cisco rep is wrong about Mason county's hydro dams. Mason county has no dams and buys most of its power from the Bonneville Power Administration. It has one generating plant of its own, and I believe that runs on natural gas.

      --

      Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  8. Their DSL prices are higher? by Brento · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Somehow I've gotta wonder when their DSL prices are more expensive than their fiber prices. Something's gotta be amiss.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
    1. Re:Their DSL prices are higher? by programR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Our DSL prices are higher than our Fiber prices because the phone company makes those charges higher....

      We provide the best prices we can on all of the different media available. DSL is more expensive to us, but Fiber is only available in certain areas... There are petitions for customers to sign to try and help get Fiber into more areas, but it really comes down to what the Public Utility District for that county is willing to foot the bill for.

      We are providing IP service over the PUD network of Fiber optics. Customers also have the ability to have On-Demand video provided over the pipe & other services like telephony. Those are currently outside the realm of what DONOBi offers, but we are working with the different PUDs in the areas we can to provide all of those services to our customers.

      --
      Jeff Wood < jwood [at] donobi [dot] com >
      Manager of Hosting & Development Services
      DONOBi
  9. Minor Info by Sedennial · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has actually been in place for some time and there are a couple of other ISP's in Mason offering fibre connectivity via the open access network, but full scale rollout has been slowed down for a number of reasons. Some political and some financial. Currently they are reviewing a wireless solution for lastmile due to unexpectedly high costs for lastmile fiber solution. Last commisioners meeting I went to had some interesting discussion taking place regarding alternative solutions for last-mile.

    Real per customer business costs far exceed various estimates due to the fact that to sign up customer X at the end of the street you have to essentially lay out fiber for EVERY home between your splice point and customer X. And unless every one of those customers signs up, you may have just expended $15k or more (since they Mason is doing an underground install not poletop) for one customer.

  10. Now, wait a second. by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, they also offer a business account that has limited bandwidth and allows servers, but that account costs the same amount as the personal account.

    So, I think they're being trustworthy. They're just saying, if you want to run servers, you have to pay for bandwidth. If you want to download pr0n, gobble away. It's a stupid model, but it doesn't seem duplicitous.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  11. I smell a lawsuit from the baby bells by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought only the baby bells had rights to lay out lines? At least thats what I hear from slashdotters who bicker about what de-regulation would do to the isp industry. Southern bell for example says if the isp's do not like it tough, they can lay out there own lines. Interestingly the government has specific contracts to the baby bells from the old bell laboratories to only use them and no one else when digging up public property like roads and open land.

    My guess is they will try to stop this isp or actually bill them through the roof since they do not want anyone else to play ball. I find it unlikely for the second to be true since more supply = less demand for their bussiness dsl and T1 service.

  12. Re:Sweet deal... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

    You dont need 100Mbps to play quake (or anything else) with your friends across town. That's all about lag times, not bandwidth.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. over your cap in 50 seconds? by bvk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    with 1 Gb = 1000 Mb, if you max out the connection at the theoretical 100Mbps you'd hit the monthly 5Gb cap in 50 seconds. Of course, at actually achieveable rates, it would probably take a few minutes.

    And after that, you could be paying $3 every few minutes. That sounds kind of pricey to me...

  14. Last mile by fishybell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As far as being a good last mile solution, it fares well, mainly because of symmetric speeds. Of course the last mile is not where you're going to see the speed bottleneck, it's at both the ISP and the webserver/etc that you're connecting to.

    What this will be exceptional for is people who have computers at various points in the Donobi network. Here are the people who will gain the most: company with multiple office locations, people who's company let's them work from home (VPN, VNC, etc), and of course, gamers. Gaming within the network will be supreme.

    I currently have Comcast. The connection can be flaky at times (supposedly because I am doing it wrong), but the speeds are incredible. I love having a 25-50 ping on the games I play, but when one of my room mates is uploading files (I'm talking to you Kai) on WinMx my ping goes down the tube fast (400 anyone?). I would love my 2.5 mbps down just as much as the next guy, but I would trade my soul just to get a synchronous speed even as low as 768 kbps (256 now). Now 100 mbps? that's fast, no matter what the other problems (pay for downloads beyond 5gb, etc).

    --
    ><));>
  15. Not cheap until.... by SirLantos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    High speed internet access will not truly be cheap until it is considered a utility instead of a commodity. Until then, people will be making wads of cash selling it to people, and that is the way it should be. Once it turns into a utility, you will see a lot more gov control over it.

    So, you have to ask yourself: Would you rather have cheap Internet service or an uncontrolled Internet?

    Something we all have to learn is that you cannot eat your cake and have it too.

    Thats just my humble opinion,
    SirLantos

    --
    The flying hamster of DOOM rains coconuts on your pitiful city.
  16. Fraud? by NineNine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me nuts, but isn't advertising something as "unlimited" when it's not, generally considered fraud? I don't care if it's really x amount of bandwidth + no servers, blah, blah, blah, but the company can't really advertise "unlimited" if it's not. A real "unlimited" pipe to the Net at xxGig/S is called a T-1, or greater. Those are generally $1500/month.

    1. Re:Fraud? by heff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i had this dispute with burlee.com, they offer unlimited space and bandwith and then bill you a "non-disputable service charge" of $250 to $500 for each "infraction". Before i knew it, my $120/yr hosting was now $600+ . I reported them to the bbb along with at least 10 other people. Some guys were charged over $1000 and then took burlee to court...i felt sorry for them.

      --

      --

      |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

  17. We don't ever learn, do we? by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are a couple of fundamental problems with 100 mbit fiber to the door. First, the cost. With real, gauranteed bandwidth costing anywhere from up to $1,000 per megabit (depending on the quality of the provider), that means that they are going to have to oversell their bandwidth like *crazy* to try and make any profit. With a 100 mbit connection, it only takes a very small number of kiddies with P2P clients to use enough bandwidth to make the entire project unprofitable. Five people using an average of 50 mbits/second each could potentially cost the company over a hundred thousand dollars per month. That means that they'd need a minimum of 2,500 customers just to break even.

    The second problem is the routing/switching. Let's say that they signed up those 2,500 people on the service. If even one tenth of them actually tried to use even half of their bandwidth at the same time, you're looking at 12 gigabits per second, which is more than an OC192 can handle.

    Yep, there are some serious problems here. The kind of problems that they will only overcome by one or more of the following:

    • capping bandwidth
    • overselling like mad, effectively capping bandwidth
    • charging a lot


    It looks like it will still be as good (or better) than DSL, but don't cling to the hopes of actually using 100 mbits.

    On the other hand, I *have* been in places where one person could actually use 100 mbits. I watched a single download from Microsoft coming along at 11 megabytes/second - 88 megabits/second. Of course, the place had a barely-used OC3.

    steve
    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    1. Re:We don't ever learn, do we? by Diskord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Our Fiber connection comes from NoaNet (www.noanet.com) and uses the existing BPA (Bonneville Power Administration) infrastructure. The pricing we recieve is based on 95th percentile billing, so you aren't charged on what your actual use is, but on what your average use is.

      Most end customers use very little bandwidth, but then burst when they are downloading a large file, demo, etc...

      Currently we have no plans to clamp or cap as you refer to it bandwidth. We do charge more as your usage increases, but at under $2 a GB, it is fairly reasonable.

  18. Easy by jaavaaguru · · Score: 3, Informative

    That would be excellent for me. My Internet habits entirely consist of...

    * Checking Slashdot and a few other discussion boards
    * Checking my e-mail
    * Chatting on Jabber, AIM and MSN
    * Updating my website
    * Occasionally downloading Redhat's software updates
    * Sometimes playing streaming music (but not very often)

    That could easily be les than 5Gb/month.

  19. Wow that's fast! by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    100mbps? Wow! 100mbps is 1 bit every 10 seconds! I can talk faster than that!

    Now, a 100Mbps connection, that I could get excited about!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Wow that's fast! by tkg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow! 100mbps is 1 bit every 10 seconds!

      Still faster than my dialup. Damn crappy phone lines.

  20. Donobi is just the ISP by Diskord · · Score: 3, Informative

    Juyst to clarify, Donobi is just one of many ISP's on our fiber network. The Fiber itself is being laid by Mason County PUD3.

    The PUD website is http://www.masonpud3.org

    There you can find a complete list of retailers, and more information on the Fiber project.

  21. Not so strange, it's the same here in Sweden by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I pay about $20 per month for having a 10-megabit jack in my wall enabled, that's about par for fibered cities in Sweden. DSL in general is a notch more expensive and a lot lower on the bandwidth ladder, it's about $25 per month for something like 2048/512 ADSL.

    I guess it has to do with cost of equipment and return on investment in densely populated areas (I live in a high-riser, so suburban villas may be different and more of a DSL place).

  22. From The TOS by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "In any case, you will be disconnected after approximately 8 hours of continuous connect time"

    This isn't something i expect/want from a fibre optic line, neither is:

    We expect that you will promptly disconnect your modem from our dialup facility when you are not actively using the connection. If we discover that your system is connected to DONOBi but idle (not sending or receiving data) we may disconnect you.
    http://www.donobi.com/terms_of_service.php

  23. Re:Have any of you been to mason county Wa? by Diskord · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would agree with you that Mason County is in the middle of BFE, being that I live in Shelton, Mason County's metropolis of 6,000 people.

    BUT, the reason Fiber is here has nothing to do with Schools. It has to do with the Electric company (Mason County PUD 3) using BPA Fiber and making it available to their customers.

  24. Yeah, great... by hafree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The first thing I do when I turn on my computer is tune into internet radio, usually a 128kbps mp3 stream for around 4 hours a day. At that rate, I'd use up my 3GB quota before the month was half over, and that doesn't even include browsing the web, sending and receiving e-mail, or downloading files. I'll stick with cable until they can figure out a better definition for "unlimited".

    1. Re:Yeah, great... by matastas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Read. The damned. Web site.

      If you don't want the business account, you don't have to worry about that. You sacrifice the ability to use server. This is what we in the Real World call 'give and take.' And it comes with the territory of paying a lower price for a service.

  25. Terms of service... by Destoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really hate those dispositions...

    Many Internet service providers block all email from sites that are primary by senders of unsolicited email. In addition, you agree to pay the following in the event you are responsible for, generating or cause any unsolicited commercial e-mail to emanate or appear to emanate from DONOBi. $500 per event plus $1.00 per message sent, plus $50 per complaint received by DONOBi, plus any damages or loss of service(s) to DONOBi, as a result of any spamming or other violation of these policies. These damages include, but are not limited to system shut downs, retaliatory attacks or data flooding.

    Translation into abuse:
    Spam with reply-to address <user>@donobi.com

    Replace <user> with name of loved one.

    Is that disposition really necessary?
    Unlimited access accounts are for intermittent usage/connection to our system as long as you are physically in front of your computer and actively using the connection.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  26. Five gigs a MONTH? Are they insane? by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I usually leech on the order of fifteen to twenty gigs a DAY. These guys have not done their homework on how the customer uses the product...

    ...either that, or they are trying to present a politically correct image of how the product will be used, in case they will go the way of the other dot-bombs. In any case, they have shown to be pulling numbers out of thin air. My guess is that the executives' secretaries print their e-mail for them.

  27. As a current user of Mason County's fiber service, by thewimps · · Score: 2, Informative
    I can fill in a few of the details people seem to be debating. Our company currently subscribes via Hood Canal Communications. We have a block of 16 static IPs and the fiber connection comes to our business at 100mb, though we typically see about 5mb/s to the internet. Keep in mind that I don't know that our connection is the limiting factor in that.

    While I agree that the bandwidth cap might discourage home users, it still makes great sense for business users. The cap is set at 5GB (that's gigabytes, no matter what the website says) and our service is not affected if we go over the limit--our checkbooks, however, are. We pay a rate of $2.20 for each GB after the 5 GB limit. Consider the amount of data we can send for the same price as our (now backup) T1:

    $900 for the old connection - $40 for the first 5GB = $860
    $860 / $2.20 per GB = 390GB
    390GB Extra + 5GB Included = 395GB monthly

    We can deal nearly 400GB monthly for the same price as our old connection. If I recall correctly, we paid the PUD $200 to bring the fiber from the road to our building and we pay something like $5 monthly for each of our IPs (except one, which obviously is included with the base price).

    We're extremely happy with the service and frankly I'm amazed that a county as rural as Mason has such great internet access. It's far better than is available just 30 minutes away in Olympia, WA.

  28. There is a bottleneck by PineHall · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the colocation page ( http://www.masonpud3.org/Telecom/Colocation/): Featuring a Gigabit (1,024 megabit/second) Backbone through the entire county!

  29. Banned Fiber by c4tp's+friend · · Score: 2, Informative

    In our silly midwestern town it was not too long ago (two weeks or so) that our city council finally made it legal. But, now we have to wait for our state public service commision to allow this service to be instated. Which means more time before our market can reach a higher level of parity between cable/DSL/fiber. Supposedly our electric company has run the cable throughout the city, but not to the houses because it has been (and still is technically) illegal to do this. Its all the government's fault that we consumers cannot pay a nominale amount for our internet. I say this because of the mandates essentially making public services monopolies in each town. For example, I believe only fifty miles away people have a choice of Cox or Qwest high speed access. Of which Qwest I believe is comparatively cheaper than Alltel which we are forced to use. Just my two cents.

    --
    I dont like it when people think about what I think (say). Rather I try to make them think like I think.
  30. Re:Avoid by kcurrie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I too live in Austin, and have a connection via Eagle. I have a fixed IP from them (as they NAT upstream so without it I couldn't run any services at all). The people I spoke with specifically spoke about some people requiring a static IP to use VPN to work, and they didn't have any problems with it AFAIK.
    And what's up with the news service?? They require authentication now?? What password??

    --
    -- I speak only for myself.
  31. 100mbps ?!? by sbaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    100mbps ... 100 millibits per second? Wow! That's 1/10th baud. You'd better
    type R-e-a-l-l-y s-l-o-w-ly!

    Maybe they should consider shooting for 100Mbps?

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  32. Actually... by unicorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point to point makes no mention of bandwidth caps anyhow. So I would assume that it's unlimited as well.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  33. Product differentiation by unicorn · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have an obvious, absolute rule to no servers. They do want to drive customers to the "business" accounts. BUT If you actually look at their page, the business accounts are the same price as the residential ones. The difference being that business accounts have a bandwidth cap.

    So you can choose what service best suits your needs. Unlimited bandwidth, geared at downstream only. Or be able to run servers as well, but be limited in the amount of "free" bandwidth you get.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  34. Former Fiber Customer by hippoart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to live in Mason County in Allyn. The 100mb fiber was the only option for Internet Connection other than dial-up. I could get digital cable but not cable modem for some dumb reason. So I paid PUD $250 to install the line from pole on street to side of my house. Donobi wanted an additional $150 or so for setup as well - I told them I could do it myself for free. After much wrangling I got out of that charge. I was only charged $39.99 a month but the problem was that the performance was extremely poor. I lived there about 6 months - had 3 service outages, and consistently low performance. The line ranked below a 256K DSL line on most tests. Donobi technically support was completely useless. I think we were only 1 of 3 or 4 customers that had this due to the high install fee. So the technical support staff was very unfamiliar with the fact that Donobi even offered fiber, much less how to troubleshoot any problems. The downloads were unlimited but again with crappy performance who cares. I have since moved into Seattle and am much happier with my DSL from Speakeasy.net

  35. FTTH Is Reality For Many by NuttyBee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in beautiful Sacramento, CA we have something very few others have -- a choice.

    Winfirst, purchased by SureWest Broadband, delivers phone / data / cable TV to thousands of Sacramento residents via fiber to the home. Comcast and SBC also offer service, but SureWest is better!

    SureWest's data rate for home users is 10 Mbps symmetrical. (And it's pretty rare that I can max that out for any period of time.) I believe I am limited to 30 GB a month before I incur additional charges. I would't know because I can't find 30 GB worth of crap to download in a month.

    I would imagine that eventually 100 Mbps service will be available here -- the infrastructure for it already exists. But really -- who needs 100 Mbps at home? You're not serving CNN to millions.

    Oh and the price -- the package of cable + 10 Mbps data + 1 phone line comes in at about $100 a month.

    All in this lovely community we call Sacramento.. Err the Future Greater Bay Area.

  36. Re:Available in Japan for two years now by ag0ny · · Score: 2, Funny

    I live in Tokyo and have a 100Mbps B-Flets line since August last year. I'm paying $230/month (27000 yen), with no restrictions of any kind. I have my own server at home, and neither uploads nor downloads are capped.

    I was a bit sceptical at the beginning, but my ISP confirmed the 'no restrictions' part after I emailed them.

    Of course, porn is ilegal here in Japan, so I guess that's the reason why they have no problem in allowing customers to set up their own server.

  37. Let me tell you about Mason County by saberworks · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have lived in Mason County since 1990 or so. Mason County is the poorest county in Washington. They have been advertising this service for years and have yet to deliver. Mason county has a very small population, and the few areas that this service is actually available are "downtown" in these little ho-dunk towns that got their first mcdonalds just a few years ago. The downtown businesses are a hardware store, some antique (junk) shops, some bars, a pet salon... not much else. A bunch of gas stations. A few weeks ago we got our first chain pizza place (a papa murphey's). Hell, look at their map of areas that are covered:

    http://www.masonpud3.org/Telecom/Where/Belfair-m ap .jpg

    Do you realize that that's a SINGLE road? Do you have any idea how few people live along that stretch of road? Look to the upper left of that map, where the big group of streets are all clustered - that's where people actually live. This isn't for the consumer -- it's paid for by our taxes (well, higher electricity bills), but only available to maybe 1% of the population in the county. I think the county would have appreicated lower electricity bills more than a fiber connection that's nothing but a pipe dream.

    Hell, I was surprised that they were offering cable internet in my neighborhood... They advertise it and promote it, but guess what? I've been waiting for over a month for a "servicability" survey (which was supposed to take 3 business days). Please don't let your community model their infrastructure and service on that of mason county.