Slashdot Mirror


Mining Mars from Houston

An anonymous reader writes "Computer simulations of what bits of Earth, Mars and Venus might be found on the moon point to new methods for extraterrestrial sample return. Because the moon is lifeless, its sterile condition gives a very rare laboratory for collecting what may be as high as 3 grams of Earth's past, from the half-ton of lunar rocks and soil that Apollo returned for study [3 grams (Earth-terran), 0.03 grams (Mars), 0.003 grams (Venus)]. While such interplanetary exchanges are now thought common, what is surprising is these pristine samples often have never exceeded a temperature of around 100 F. Any similar planetary samples found today in, say, Antarctica, would have been weathered, eroded, or contaminated."

11 of 63 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting stuff by Matrix2110 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing I would point out is that there is very little chance of recovering DNA from these samples, Correct me if I am wrong (I'm sure that will happen :) ) but organic matter would not stand a chance against the vacuum and radiation involved here.

    1. Re:Interesting stuff by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Informative

      While recovering DNA may be hard / impossible (I'm fixing military aircraft for a living, not extracting organinc matter from rocks), we still can learn a lot of interesting things. After all, we can't extract DNA from a fossil, yet it teaches us (or rather, the guys who do that sort of thing for a living or as a hobby) a lot about the creature in question.


      I am, however, reminded by a television programe I saw on Discovery Europe a while back... where they 'proved' - by setting up a simulated Mars-base in Antartica or somewhere - that human explorers might see signs of life that a robotic explorer would miss. And I'm sure they could set up a (simplified?) DNA-extraction lab in a potential Mars-base too, thus preventing any organic remains from beeing erradicated by the radiation in outer space.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:Interesting stuff by s1234d · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apollo 12 landed on the moon next to a Surveyor probe that had been there for a couple of years. The astronauts cut off a camera, and brought it back to earth. Inside the camera some bacteria were still technically alive, but in a dormant state. So the vacuum won't destroy DNA by itself, and if bacteria if in a crack deep in a rock then radiation is not really an issue either.

  2. Here's the link by DredPirateRoberts · · Score: 5, Informative
    This article is what I was thinking of.

    --
    "All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - George Orwell
  3. from Houston? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're kidding. There's oil on Mars?

    1. Re:from Houston? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You said: Definitely not. If there was oil on Mars, Dubya would have long declared war on it. :)

      <rant>Fuckups like you shouldn't breed. If we wanted the oil, we would appease Iraq so they could pump it all day long and bring the price to $10, not kick their leadership's ass.

      Do a little homework, and ask the FRENCH about the oil and $$$. There are NO American oil companies profiting in Iraq. Only French and Russian. Listen to what Iraqi's who are outside waiting to go back say. Why is is that every Iraqi living outside Iraq thinks the US is doing a tough thing for the right reasons, and openly SAYS that France and Russia are more concerned with their financial interests? Its not MY opinion, its the opinion of IRAQIS who are in a position to speak freely.

      It just galls you pricks that the man is doing what he thinks is right (whether or not you and i agree), and you can't attack that, so you make up this false 'for oil' shit. No one, except you fellow idealogs, buys this arguement. Go crawl back under the agenda driven rock you crawled out from under and get your facts straight.

      Attack the policies, attack the ideas, fine:
      We can debate ideas, but when you attack the individual instead, it shows you don't have an arguement, just a bone to pick. </rant>

  4. Previous research by LegendLength · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Unmanned gathering of moon rock was carried out back in 1972 by the Russians. It took 7 years after the analysis was published before anyone realized that there were organic patterns in the samples.

    Real images of the fossils show bacteria-like shapes. There were claims that these fossils prove existance of life elsewhere in space but it seems more likely to me that they somehow came from Earth.

  5. ASTEROID sample return. by zzztkf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Japan's space agency,ISAS, is attepmting to send
    a probe to asteroid 1998SF36 and get sample to
    retrun to Earth.

    Launch will take place 2003, May.

    http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/index.html

  6. Safe Sample Return by photonrider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are some scientists worred about bringing samples directly from Mars to Earth. Fears of some unknown contamination. A moon base would be a perfect place to return from a Mars trip with samples. Keeps Earth isolated from possible contaminants.

  7. Funding un-manned mining... by billysara · · Score: 5, Funny

    Funding research on bringing back oil/minerals from high-radiation, toxic environments will certainly come in handy if the middle-east goes nuclear....

    Yes, I'm feeling cynical today..... :-)

  8. Huh? by freeweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The amounts they're talking about are what they expect to be able to extract from the half-ton or so that Apollo returned. 3 grams of material from Earth, 0.03g from Mars (makes sense, it's a hell of a lot further away), and 0.003g from Venus (far away, and closer to the sun. material has one hell of a time getting AWAY from the sun's gravitational well).

    I'd say yeesh, read the article before you spout off your ignorance, but hey, this is Slashdot.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.