Slashdot Mirror


Spider-Man Has Back Problems

skantman writes "Potentially sad news for Spiderfans. Tobey Maguire has back problems and may have to pull out of the Spider-Man sequel." Since the film was apparently slated to pay him 11M GBP, sucks to be him just as much as us if he doesn't play the part. CT Updated, thats 11M pounds, not USD.

17 of 460 comments (clear)

  1. No Big Deal by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The linked article says Jake Gyllenhaal has been lined-up as a possible replacement. While he was previously typecast into creepy character roles (Donnie Darko and The Good Girl), he proved in Moonlight Mile that he is a thousand times the actor of Tobey Maguire. Not that I wish any suffering on Maguire, but I do believe the sequel would be better off without him.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:No Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Like MASH. Like Bewitched. Like Bond. It can work if you replace the original with a better actor. Batman is a bad example because Michael Keaton just is Batman. It is not possible to get better. I don't get the sense that Tobey just is Spiderman. I thought he was only mediocre.

    2. Re:No Big Deal by pizzaman100 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Like Bewitched.

      Both of those actors were dicks.

  2. CGI to the rescue? by Greedo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Almost all of the cool Spidey stuff in the first movie was CGI anyway, so what is it exactly that Mr. Macguire can't do? Pose?

    Do you really need that much back muscle to kiss a dripping wet Kirsten Dunst?

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:CGI to the rescue? by larien · · Score: 5, Funny
      Dripping wet Kirsten Dunst... MMmmmmmm

      Oops, wrong muscle...

    2. Re:CGI to the rescue? by operagost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like you pulled it all right ...

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  3. Re:Please say it ain't so!! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

    *cough*organicwebshootersnotincomic*cough*

  4. Not Entirely Out by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note that the article states Toby might not be up to performing "difficult" stunts - which is just fine. We're not going to be able to tell if that's Toby or someone else under that suite with the mask on. Realistically, his back problems, which by the way are in "in the final stages of healing" according to the article, should not pose such a threat as to completely disabling him from acting altogether. If you want to make a bet, Toby is going to be in the sequel.

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  5. What next? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aqua Man drowning in his tub?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  6. Re:That's 11m pounds by Michael_Burton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, I'd probably sprain my back, carrying around a wallet that heavy.

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
  7. Tobey Maguire may pull out of Spider-Man by joel8x · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Tobey Maguire may pull out of Spider-Man" - Thats the title of the linked article. Am I the only one who thinks that sounds funny?

    I gotta grow up.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  8. he doesn't have to do his own stunts by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't Spider-Man wear a MASK? A stunt double doesn't even need to look like him! What's the problem here?

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  9. Publicity stunt...? by Glove+d'OJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder if this is actual "news" or simply a poorly-disguised press release. If it is the latter, then I think that they succeded at generating a "buzz" around the upcoming Spiderman movie.

    (fly-pun not intended, but I am claiming it.)

  10. Corrections (Reuters, Hollywood Reporter, AICN) by iRobogeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    First off, it's $17M. ;-) And there's updated info and clarification at Yahoo/Reuters, AICN, and Yahoo/Hollywood Reporter. Don't panic or freak out. This looks like a rumor that got out of control, and is now being actively denied by the powers-that-be.

    --
    I think, therefore I am. (I think.)
  11. Jake Gyllenhaal Creepy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion

  12. Re:Doesn't he do yoga and eat vegetarian? by djrogers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dang it, havent they learned anything yet? Superheroes should STAY AWAY from horses!

    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  13. Rumour debunked? by Markgor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently, Harry Knowles of Ain't It Cool "reports" that the rumour is simply a rumour.