Slashdot Mirror
Bush Demands Apple Recount
*no comment* writes "In what may be one of the funniest things since MSN's site saying iMac is the best computer, Apple's news site picked up a story from crazyapplerumors about how George Bush is demanding a recount an Al Gore's election to the Apple board." Rumor sites bad, parody sites good. Remember that the next time you ask for a press pass to Macworld.
Rumor sites BAD? Hell...as if Mac users (myself included) weren't fanatical enough already, Rumor sites provide the mosed obsessed Mac nuts a place to feel right at home...They're the closest thing to a case mod community Apple's got (except, of course, for the Apple case mod community)
But seriously...Apple rumor sites are all in good fun...they give you that little thrill that you know something Mr. Jobs doesn't want you to know. And seldom does harm come from a rumor site (yes, there have been exceptions in the past, but I mean on the whole). And who is to say that the crazy ideas brought up in the bizarre and frightening rumor forums don't give Apple clues as to the direction customers want them to go? Or clues as to how to go about marketing their products?
I don't think they're a bad thing at all...no worse than sites claiming to have the latest screenshots from "Windows Longhorn XXP 2006 super confidential unix-powered beta."
"p2p stabbing is such a vast, untapped market"
Whoa, whoa. What moron mod gave this +1, Funny? Someone new to Slashdot? This is a troll message that appears in every Apple thread.
I hope I get this one in meta moderation.
Morons.
-/-
Mikey-San
Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
It would have been more prudent for Apple to select someone with a "winner" image, maybe someone from the world of sports like Michael Jordan.
I thought the Crazy Apple Rumors story was pretty funny. I thought Apple's linking to it from their news page made it hilarious. And yet, I've never had any warm 'n' fuzzy feeling about Steve Jobs sense of humor.
No prediction, but I certainly wouldn't be surprised to find that some spirited person at Apple has lost their job over this. Hope not.
When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
Article II Section 1 (and 2 through 4 for that matter) says no such thing. Section 1 doesn't even mention the court and the rest of Article II only refers to the President's power to appoint Court Justices.
Section 1. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows:
Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.
The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves. And they shall make a list of all the persons voted for, and of the number of votes for each; which list they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted. The person having the greatest number of votes shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such majority, and have an equal number of votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately choose by ballot one of them for President; and if no person have a majority, then from the five highest on the list the said House shall in like manner choose the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by States, the representation from each state having one vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. In every case, after the choice of the President, the person having the greatest number of votes of the electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal votes, the Senate shall choose from them by ballot the Vice President.
The Congress may determine the time of choosing the electors, and the day on which they shall give their votes; which day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
The President shall, at stated times, receive for his services, a compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that period any other emolument from the United States, or any of them.
Before he enter on the executio
It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man
-James Baldwin
If Gore is an "avid Mac User," what the hell is he doing using Final Cut Pro?
That is where election law is defined. I don't think he's saying "this is where it says the Supreme Court can decide elections"; he's saying "this is where the system of elections are defined, and since the supreme court is the ultimate authority on interpreting the constitution, they are indeed the final arbiter here".
Legally protected speech Good. Violations of NDAs and Trade secrets Bad. Remember that next time you write a headline.
Word to the wise:
When you see that this troll has been modded up, it's usually because the AC that posted it has mod points to burn on his futile little crusade... Hence the reason you got smacked down to -1 so quickly.
P.S. I think you might be on the right track with the 'living in the parent's basement' issue, this character manages to tack the same troll to every Apple post within 30 minutes of its posting... Fiscal/Academic Responsibilities = 0.0
I hate Grammar Nazi's
I find that site so god dam annoying. Its probably because I had incidents with a newbie who just switched from PC posting a new topic for every story but it made me go nuts. I mean people get it mixed up with the real sites. (God knows how) I also dont understad the humor on it but I like Jackass wich is hilarious yet so simple a child could have thought it up. Also anyone who bashes the Mac rumor sites probably doesent use a Mac and doesent understand the whole Mac community which can be described as unique in my opinion. I doubt speculating on the next Dell would be very fun because they look shockingly the same and the changes are always 'big' and 'exciting' like no disk drive, shock shock horror horror. I supose there is just more to speculate about and take an intrest because Apples stuff is normaly quite inoativite. Also when your watching the Keynot (If they still exist) you can laugh at thr rumor sites that got it wrong you dislike and claim that it was an easy mistake to make if you liked them And have you seen how much Apple charges us? Dont want to buy a Mac then see a new one next week. Not usualy long between anouncment and shipping unless its high end. but apple really hates them because then we do say lets not spend and they get odd spikes in sales and then you get the im eaithinf got the model with these new features and they take ages to buy them. The buyers guide at macrumors.com shows it perfectly. Some things it says DONT BUY which is not what apple wants. Ok this is a round up but if you read rumors then you would pretty much know this.
I kind of expected that someone at Apple posted the link to "Bush Demands Recount" on their Hot News site late at night and no one had noticed yet, but it's been there all day.
I think it shows that Apple has a pretty good sense of humor that they kept it up there, even though some conservative Mac users are probably pretty steamed.
Well, probably not as steamed as the thousands people in Florida who didn't get to vote in the 2000 election because the private auditing firm hired by Jeb Bush arranged for legitimate voters to have their votes tossed out if they had a similar name to that of a felon's.
Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
Any joke is funny because it has a basis in fact, however tenuous.
I'm a Republican as a whole and a conservative all the time, black, and a Macintosh user. I find the link and the article very funny, just as many of us would giggle when we hear the word "chad" nowandays.
And, folks, given the events going on in the world, can't we all use a laugh about a nonsense item like this? Apple isn't in the business of making us laugh or giving commentary about world events, so this small nod to humor is a way to make us smile a bit and remember when life was a little simpler.
The only thing that would be funnier is getting Al Gore's tongue-in-cheek response back in turn: "Dibs, George. And, by the way, your AppleCare warranties appear to have expired..."
Must be the chads.
Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
Yeah, that's a real riot. People are getting killed and you make a joke. I'm doubled up with glee.