Slashdot Mirror


Watching Kids Via Mobile Phone

Joe the Lesser writes "This BBC article says how parents could soon keep a much closer eye on what children are up to on their way to and from school thanks to a mobile monitoring system. It will send text alerts to their mobile phone if the child deviates too far from that route or takes too long getting there."

22 of 253 comments (clear)

  1. Whatever by jhunsake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like this won't be hard to fool. Give your phone to a friend that *is* going to the school event. Or any number of a million different ways. Kids are very innovative.

    1. Re:Whatever by Liora · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I can already see it...

      "Hey, are you going straight home after school?"
      "Yeah"
      "Can you drop my phone on my doorstep on your way?"

      That would have been my method at least...

      --
      Liora
    2. Re:Whatever by stilwebm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many of the kids who do stray from their path with get the idea from this type of "leash" technology.

      Give the kids some responsibility and some space. Let them grow. Otherwise they will be thrown in to college or the real world with the need for responsibility for their first time. I've seen it happen, and believe me, it is not pretty.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Re:WW2 by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was world war II fought so that we could enjoy the freedoms we don't want our children to?

    Like the freedom to get snatched while walking to school? As with any information utensil, it's only as invasive as you make it. Something like this appeals to me as a father of a young daughter. I wouldn't use it to track where she's going, only to alert me if something "went wrong". What they fought for in WWII is to allow me the freedom to utilize this tool if I think it necessary.

  4. Re:WW2 by DaemonGem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Some good parenting = trust ! facist paranoia."

    I never had this problem with my parents. They always trusted me, I'm pleased to say, however, I'm not here to discuss me. There are a million ways to get around this, such as ... leaving your phone at home, or turning your phone off. Now perhaps people will say that since they are kids, and most kids are irresponsible, this is a good thing to do. However:

    "Rules are meant to be broken"
    -Some wise soul

    I take for example spy software that my best friend's mother put on his computer. He wasn't computer savvy enough to bypass it, however, if I had had such software on my computer:

    1. I would hate my parents, and feel resentful towards them.
    2. I would do my best to bypass this with things that are available here.

    Don't people realize that spying on your kids will only make them want to break the rules? If I knew that my parents were the type that would spy on me while I'm at school, then I would refuse to have a cell phone.

    This seems to me to be something for overly paranoid and protective parents that think they can't trust their kids, and need to know at what second of the day their kids are doing anything.
    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
  5. Stop The Madness! by Newskyarena · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They have similar devices already. Usually they are attached to the ankles of Inmates who are under house confinement. You want your children to grow up in fear, strap one of these phones to them and teach your children to be afraid of the consequences of deviating from the defined path. Why not proactively teach them the right way to conduct themselves through positive reinforcement rather than by making them paranoid?

  6. Children as Products by SuperMario666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An average one mile walk will have around 10 checkpoints but the parent can have fewer if they wish.

    Maybe by the time my children get around to having children we'll have mobile phones that can completely rob our children of free will. Hell, since we're already starting to design them from birth maybe phone triggered on(wake)/off(sleep) switches as well. Anything to keep us from actually having to waste our precious time or assume any sort of responsibility for our kids - that's what technology and the government are for!

    1. Re:Children as Products by natet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hello, do you even have kids?? Do you know every minute of the day what they are doing? If so, you are a better parent than I. This doesn't have to be a fascist thing. I for one would like to know if my kid actually got to school. If he is cutting class, that is possibly a symptom of a larger problem, and should probably be discussed.

      In this day and age when parents are afraid to do something as basic as spank thier child, it is about time that someone came out with something to help even things out.

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
  7. Pay attention to your kids! by Occam's+Hammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Presumably, the reason parents aren't able to maintain a close trust-building connection to their kids its that they are too busy.

    Yet...they have time to program their Sprint "Orwell's Friends and family" plan and change the parameters every time their kid goes to the mall.

    <free advice> Invest the time in your kids rather than their phones! </free advice>

    --
    (sig on loan to Smithsonian)
  8. Pink Floyd said it by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hush, my baby. Baby, don't you cry.
    Momma's gonna make all of your nightmares come true.
    Momma's gonna put all of her fears into you.
    Momma's gonna keep you right here under her wing.
    She won't let you fly, but she might let you sing.

    What we do to our kids, they will eventually turn around and do it to us.

  9. children's rights? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know that legally colonial serfs had more rights than I do as a minor in the USA, but I wouldn't take shit like this.

    This is just begging for waterproof-testing, dogbiteproof-testing, bullyproof-testing, backingcaroverproof-testing, and fireproof-testing. I can understand the acceptability for much younger children, but by the time we get a single friend with a driver's license the "leash" idea is dead in the water.

    You celebrate that the government doesn't have the right to put a radio collar on you, yet you jump at the oppurtunity to put one on your own child!

    "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:children's rights? by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You celebrate that the government doesn't have the right to put a radio collar on you, yet you jump at the oppurtunity to put one on your own child!

      A parent has an obligation to be informed of their childs where-abouts, and safety. Governments do not raise children, parents do. Parents care about the well-being, which is exactly why he said he would use it as a notifier if something went wrong.

      This is a good thing.

      If your parents don't trust you at 16, I would say it has something to do with you, not them.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:children's rights? by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah. The reductio argument. You're making the logical fallacy of assuming that because premises A, A' and A'' are linked, they are necessarily either all true or all false.

      It's obviously not such a great idea to let your daughter sleep with the overweight, balding, sweaty 46 year old bloke down the road, ugly questions of sexual power and maniuplation get raised as he is, by definition, likely around 30 years more mature than she.

      However, you sound as though you would restrict your daughter's right to have sex with the 16 year old bloke she took to the prom. Where's the harm in that? Or does she suddenly become mature enough to make these decisions herself when she turns 21? Like a light switch?

  10. Re:This worries me by abe+ferlman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First they required implants until you turn 18, but I was of age so I was silent.

    Then they required implants to get discounts at the grocery store. But I buy all my food at the froofy vegan store so I was silent.

    Then they required implants to carry a gun, but didn't think I could successfully revolt against a tyrannous government so I was silent.

    Then they required implants to drive a car, but even working the required 72 hours a week I couldn't afford my own vehicle so I was silent.

    Then the government discovered an axis between civil rights groups, terrorists and liberals, and the only people left to speak up for me were 19 year old republican vegan pacifists with poor eyesight, and she was shot so I was fucked.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  11. This is the future... of oppression. by Gary+Franczyk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oppression always shows its strongest form on children. There is an enormous amount of power in the hands of the parents.

    Parents do things to children that would be unconscionable on ordinary citizens, or even the worst criminals.

    Think about it. Think of the uproar that would occur if the government:

    - Drugged undesirables with adult 'ritalin'.
    - Tracked our movements to make sure we were in the right place at the right time.
    - Removed the right to free speech like they do at schools. (even though the supreme court ruled that the right to free speech did not end when students and teachers entered the school doors)

    Just something to think about.

  12. Awesome idea, but... by Joey7F · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am certain that no one, not even the cellular services, will use this to their advantage...

    Two years later...

    ::walking downtown::

    ::Text message beeps::

    I open it and it says,

    "Why not try a tasty burger from 'Flinging Freddy's' only 2 blocks away."

    Call my cynical,

    --Joey

  13. why I care by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not suggesting a legal remedy, nor am I saying that parenting should be restricted by the government. I am saying that placing such restrictions on children is a bad idea and is rarely in their best interest.

    I care because I read George Orwell's 1984, and I saw that as a possible future.

    No one gives a shit about parent and child relationships so long as they aren't physically or sexually abusive. In 15 months, is it likely that I won't give a shit either? Do any of us care about the plight of other human beings that we can't directly relate to?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  14. ready for corporate camp! by NedTheNerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WARNING: Timmy is leaving the sceduled path deserters will be shot! there is a viable alternative for this device. actualy WALKING WITH your child to school. but of course if thats too much you can have your robot drug your child and have him shipped to school via fed ex.

  15. This makes sense... by soundofthemoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because everyone knows there's no difference between kids and criminals. Or is that kids and property?

    Bumper sticker: My junenile delinquent is screwing your honor roll student.

  16. Re:WW2 by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I grew up in the 60s. Lots of kids everywhere, and we just flew out the door every day and played with other kids with minimal adult supervision. These days, the media has scared parents so much that they feel obliged to monitor their kids every minute of every day. Free-form play, wherein children make up their own rules and form their own associations, has been replaced by tightly scheduled, highly supervised activities supervised by adults. So, kids become accustomed to constant adult supervision, and while this does teach them things like cooperation and how to live in a world of prescribed rules, it does not teach them leadership or creativity.

    We live in a time where our civil liberties are in great peril, and it seems that so very few people seem to care (present company excepted, of course). Are we raising a generation of kids that have been so tightly supervised by parents that they see nothing amiss when government takes over the same supervisory role as they mature to adulthood? Sometimes I wonder...

  17. Re:His opinion should matter... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They never realized that the reason why I could do anything was because I realized I shouldn't.

    You realized you shouldn't because you were given the chance to come to that decision like a human, not tethered to your parents 24/7.
    Trust works both ways. Parents who subject their children to this kind of treatment show that they are the ones who have problems with trust.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"