Slashdot Mirror


Firefly Coming to DVD

Kaypro writes "According to the scoop over at Ain't it Cool, it seems that Fox has decided that there's not enough viewers to keep the Firefly series on the air, but somehow there's enough fans to make money off DVD sales. Go figure. Included in the set will be the entire season plus unaired episodes and the original pilot in full 16:9 format. Extras I assume are included as well. No release date has been set as of yet." The missing episodes will be nice. In order will be nice. Such a good show. The last couple of episodes were just awesome.

44 of 219 comments (clear)

  1. Its a shame by taeric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know a lot of people were put off by the first few episodes not being that great. Personally, I liked the entire series, I was just not around much while it was on. I just can't understand why they would put it on during a Friday night.

    Can someone explain the demographic they are shooting for with that time-slot?

    1. Re:Its a shame by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Funny

      The "Sci Fi Friday" demographic. They may have been trying to compete with Sci Fi's lineup. I think a few subscription channels have science fiction shows on Fridays (could be wrong as I don't have any).

      It does seem like a terrible time, especially at 7PM my time. The people that may have watched it otherwise who get off of work around 5PM would have to race home to watch it (and I assume do whatever it is other people do when they first get home).

      I don't think they are going for the market that actually goes out on Friday nights :)

    2. Re:Its a shame by cynan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wow, you couldn't be more wrong. Yes, you could be right that the show itself is partly responsible because the first two episodes were not as engaging and original as the rest of the show, but Fox scrapped their 2 episode pilot and they were forced to write a new one OVER THE WEEKEND. X-Files survived that slot with worse ratings than Firefly, probably because it was less expensive, and Fox was more of an up-and-coming network. And as to vcrs, tivos and downloading the show, you're totally off. Fox is a business. They make their money from advertising, and they use Nielsen ratings to decide how many people are seeing their advertising. They know people can avoid watching the commercials if they use a vcr or tivo, and they aren't even there if you download the show. Fox doesn't want to count those viewers. Finally, there is a groundswell of support for this show, especially given that it ran for only 11 episodes and the pilot aired as the series finale. Check out sites like fireflyfans.net, http://www.immantcreative.com/fireflysos/, and fireflysupport.com. As for ebay, it's pretty unethical to sell tapes. Maybe Firefly fans just have a conscience. There are many high-quality rips in circulation, including 800MB SVCD versions of all episodes. It's nice to see that Fox has at least seen that there's enough of a market for Firefly on DVD to warrant their attention.

    3. Re:Its a shame by jimhill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once upon a time there was a little show called "The X Files". It had a quiet little time slot on Friday nights and against all odds, it became fairly successful. The numbers were small but the viewers were passionate and Fox said "Cool! Fanboys stay home on Friday nights for skiffy shows!" So in their finite wisdom they moved "The X Files" to Sundays and have sent skiffy-related show after show after show to die on Fridays because it turns out that "The X Files" was special.

      Admittedly, some of the shows that have died have done so deservedly ("Freakylinks", anyone?) but programs like "Millennium" and "Firefly" and "Strange Luck" deserved better than to wither and die on the Friday vine.

      --
      Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
    4. Re:Its a shame by DragonTHC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you got it all wrong. The fans were large and organized. They launched a massive campaign to help save firefly. This included sending thousands of postcards to the powers that be at fox and CBS. Most of those fans did not trade rips. I, however possess every aired episode on vcd. That's not to say that I won't be buying the DVD. I most certainly will, as will most of the fans.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    5. Re:Its a shame by cynan · · Score: 2, Informative
      "We did [write a new premiere episode], because they wanted to make sure we could deliver the ... show with a little more action and humor than what I had originally pitched," Whedon said. "So Tim Minear and I wrote a script over the weekend. They told us on a Friday night that they wanted it ... in order to decide. ... They said, 'It needs to be on our desks before we get there in the morning on Monday.' I didn't realize it would be so instrumental in them actually picking up the show. But, yeah, a little pressure. But I love pressure. The two-hour [episode] might be a special event in the middle of the season, instead of shown as a two-hour pilot. I'm not sure if that's a final decision or not."
      Whedon Details Firefly Flap

      I can't tell you whether this is correct or not, but it's a direct quote from a fairly reputable source. You decide.

  2. Fox +1 by kewsh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I give FOX a thumbs up for this. I mean they could have release Joe Millionaire on dvd....

  3. Additional Info and Help for blooper clip by Kaypro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excerpt from AICN:

    "Further to the piece about Firefly coming to DVD at some point, the UK Sci-Fi channel have now added the series to their listing for May. According the listings here they have it on Sundays at 7pm starting with the first part of Serenity on May 18th. In their forums they have also confirmed they'll be showing the unaired episodes!! YEAH!!!"

    Also I have a blooper quicktime clip of FireFly which is pretty funny, but more often scary. Weighing in at 57.9MB, I was wondering if anyone would be willing to host it on a BitTorrent link for our fellow Slashdotians. Reply below.

  4. Ok Fox... by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, Fox...

    Where's MILLENNIUM!?

  5. Unfortunately.. by phocuz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I live in a backwater communist country (read Sweden), so I haven't had the chance to see it yet. We're usually a year or two behind everyone else. It's quite annoying actually, since you usually manage to spoil half of the episodes just by reading stuff on the net.

    Anyone with a well-paid job in the states who want to switch lives with a law-student in Stockholm? I have a cute girl-friend that would be included. Anyone?

    1. Re:Unfortunately.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sweden is not communist.

      Please don't lie to the Americans, they're already ignorant enough as it is.

      Thank you.

  6. This is a nice thing about DVD's... by bitmason · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's apparently cost effective to release them for series that weren't on the air long and which will therefore be difficult to find even in syndication (which has traditionally at least demanded that shows be on the air for three years or so to sell). The other short-lived Fox show I'd like to see come out on DVD is Action.

    Fox didn't handle Firefly particularly well but I'm sort of doubtful that was the reason for its demise at the end of the day. I sort of enjoyed it and found the characters generally appealing, but the whole literal Western in space thing took a REALLY massive suspension of disbelief. The whole economic system the show portrayed just didn't make sense (e.g. paying for an interstellar trip by hauling some cattle around). Etc. And it was reputedly a very expensive show to make.

    1. Re:This is a nice thing about DVD's... by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fox didn't handle Firefly particularly well but I'm sort of doubtful that was the reason for its demise at the end of the day.

      Seriously? You don't think that airing it on alternating weeks on a random time slot (8pm, 12:05am, 12:20am) is the reason for its demise?
      How about airing episodes out of order so that they would talk about stuff that was supposed to have happened but we haven't seen yet.

      How about hyping the girl in the box for a whole summer and then cancelling the series before even ever showing the girl-in-a-box pilot?

      Someone at Fox wanted that show to fail. I dunno what they were shooting in their veins at the time, but they did everything in their power to make that show fail (12:20am! I kid you not!).

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:This is a nice thing about DVD's... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      what firefly where you watching?

      He kicked a guy into the jet intake, shot a guy in the head, left an old woman to die.. sheesh, what do you want? you want him to rip out there eyes an skull fuck them?
      you didn't like the show, fine, but for TV, he was pretty much a renegade tough guy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Re:Firefly? by garak88 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I really enjoyed Firefly and was very disapointed when it was cancelled. The idea of seeing the three unaired episodes really makes me happy. For those of you who don't know much about Firefly, its basic premise revolved around a trader/smuggler who once fought a secessionist war against Earth (heavily referencing the American Civil War). In describing it, the creator Joss Weadon said, "The idea that they may have invented cool lasers but not everybody can afford them is sort of the premise on which we work. Lasers take you to a science-fiction place that I feel has been covered too much." Firefly was the type of ship he flew. The first episode aired was terrible, but the show continued to get better and better. There were lots of subplots and so forth. One of the things I really appreciated from the show was they never showed sound in space, which was done very artfully and really added an eerie feel to the show. Over all it was very well done.

  8. Re:Firefly? by Jethro · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Space Western" works for almost any SciFi show. It was the original description for Star Trek.

    While Firefly did have a lot of semi-low-tech frontier-town-like adventures, they balanced it off fairly well showing the high-tech rich worlds.

    It's a real shame the pilot didn't air first. The pilot clearly showed that there are bery highly advanced worlds, full of high-tech. Unfortunately, many people don't like the opressive governemnt running these worlds and have relocated to distant frontier worlds, where they aren't as supressed by the government, but also don't have access to much of the advanced tech.

    Firefly was a very well-made show. Fox chose to push the Space Western aspect, airing the more space-westerny episodes first. I guess they thought that'd be the show's gimmik, rather than really good writing and character development.

    Anyway, yes, Firefly was a "space western", but not "just a space western". I think a better description would be "Really well written space western".

    Another good description would be "The Anti Startrek". The ship actually has a bathroom, for goodnessake.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  9. 'Heart of Gold' and 'Trash' scripts by shine-shine · · Score: 4, Informative

    The scripts of the three unaried episodes were auctioned on ebay and two of them were later released by the buyer. Go grab Heart of Gold' and 'Trash'.

  10. Re:Firefly? by Noksagt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are a ton of sites to answer not only this question, but the same question for MANY other shows as well. I won't remind you that a google search for firefly space western may turn up some infromative pages, but will point you to TV Tome.

  11. Re:Firefly? by knightinshiningarmor · · Score: 3, Funny

    New /. poll:

    How many of you have seen^H^H^H^H heard of "Firefly"?
    It's the best |..| 18 votes
    What the @!%&#$ is that?? |.............| 8142 votes
    CowboyNeal should be shot |...| 246 votes

  12. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop and think about it for a second.

    Cost to produce new TV shows and air them? Lots

    Cost to release existing shows on a cheap meduim? Not a lot.

    It's very simple.

  13. I think I was right.. by beldraen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I had made a comment that the issue isn't that Fox couldn't/wasn't doing well with Firefly, it was that Fox new that reality T.V. had more bang for the buck. Since it appears that Fox tried to tell Joss what do to and he wouldn't, they were more than prepared to tank the show in favor of all this rubbish that has been coming down the pike. Producing a DVD for an "unviable" series I think proves that Fox knew full well the series had and has a following.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
  14. Buy the DVDs, win a TV show? by Xenex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "...it seems that Fox has decided that there's not enough viewers to keep the Firefly series on the air, but somehow there's enough fans to make money off DVD sales. Go figure."

    I'm going to be uncharacteristically non-cynical for a moment, and suggest an alternate theory. Perhaps Fox will see how many DVD sets are sold, and if sales are surprisingly high, continue the series.

    TV production houses now undoubtedly see DVD sales as a huge revenue earner, most likely beginning to rival their traditional advertising and subscription income. Now, even if the series doesn't cover costs while being broadcast, the money from DVD sales could potentially more than make up for that. In that scenario, a series like FireFly would have a huge chance at success - but it would all depend on how much the fanbase truly does value the show.

    The future of TV could become little more than DVD advertising, with the episodes shown on the air little more than fodder to lure people in. DVD sets then become the real product, and are sold riddled with bonuses, extra scenes, and eventually, as in this case, extra episodes.

    So, maybe Fox will think there's enough viewers - if you cough up for the DVDs.

    (Then again, what do I know? I've never watched FireFly, I have no experience with American cable TV at all! Armchair analysis is fun!)

    1. Re:Buy the DVDs, win a TV show? by Aexia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nathan Fillon, who played Captain Reynolds, signed for a pilot on another show in the fall. So I think that pretty much puts the final nail in the coffin.

      But I think you're overestimating the importance of this. Fox already has these episodes in the can. It has nothing to lose by releasing them on DVD.

      Staking the success of a brand new season on DVD sales would be a huge risk.

  15. Commentary Tracks by Momomoto · · Score: 3, Funny

    Adam Baldwin (Jayne) said on the Fox Firefly message board that one of the commentary tracks was going to be the entire cast, plus Joss and Tim Minear (one of the head writers), drinking beer and generally mocking their characters.

    Good times, good times.

    --
    "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
  16. Re:Fox -1 by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Honestly, the sets are why I liked the show. Star Trek looks like a cruise liner, not a military ship. FireFly is the first sci-fi where the inside of the ship actually looks like the inside of a real ship - functional, cheap, and not as many windows as people would like. And the freaking sofas and normal terrestrial furniture/decorations reinforce that.

    I loved how FireFly's ship just seemed so real. A ship I could finally believe.

  17. bah, I already have the complete Outlaw Star by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    Atleast the stories in Outlaw Star made sense.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  18. Fired up about Firefly by genessy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see a lot of people knocking 'Firefly' around. They call it a ripoff or not entertaining enough or confusing. Wake up and smell the cow manure blended with starship exhaust.

    What isn't a ripoff these days? Most creators of art even take the time to admit and thank those that influenced their work. Space westerns have been around much longer than, oh say 'Cowboy Bebop' for example. Robert Heinlein and other authors have explored that genre before. So what? If an old idea is done well, it can bring enjoyment to new people.

    It may not be interesting enough to you. Everyone is entitled to their opinions ('specialy if they're congruent with mine). I find it quite interesting however. Science fiction blended with sociological aspects appeals to quite a lot of people. Remember, it was fringe groups that got many science fiction shows the recognition they deserve. Examples: 'The X-Files', 'Farscape', 'Buffy', just to name a few of the more recent.

    Confusing? Okay, I don't have a better answer for this. You're confused and you read Slashdot? Do you have an interpreter?

  19. It will be shown in the UK by Snaller · · Score: 2, Informative

    British SciFI have bought all of Firefly and will start showing it next month. Originally they were planning to show it in the same order as in the US, but when fans (from across the pond) started emailing them about the importance of NOT showing the pilot LAST (like Fox did!) they agreed to show the series in the right order (fancy that).

    http://www.uk.scifi.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=3 516

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  20. Re:Firefly, Fox's real action rip off of Cowboy Be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I am so tired of this fanboy bullshit.

    It's always the same pattern:

    "[TV Show/Movie] is a complete and utter ripoff of [some TV show or movie or book the fanboy irrationally obsessed about]" as if the latter was the first ever made with the themes or ideas in question.

    You see, to fanboys, there is no history existing before the moment they saw the show/movie they consider the archetype. The entertainment universe simply cam into being fully formed at that moment.

    Dude, I dug Bebop, enough to shell out semiserious cash for the special eidition DVD boxed set, but Bebop and Firefly are completely distinct shows.

    Is Trigun a ripoff of Bebpo or vice versa?

    It's like someone I know claiming the PS2 game Xenosaga is a Stargate ripooff because both start with the unearthing of ancient alien tech on Earth. He's a Stargate fanboy, so the idea of ancient alien tech on Earth came into being with that movie. Forget the fact that H.P. Lovecraft was exploring that idea in the 1930's, and the fact that Xenosaga then leaps 4000 years into the future and has nothing to do with Stargate's story. To him, Xemosaga is a Stargate ripoff because of a single common theme in the opening scenes.

  21. Re:I didn't like it by Phosphor3k · · Score: 3, Funny

    C'mon, tell the truth. You are just angry Firefly didn't have muppets, aren't you?

  22. Re:No One Watching? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    We watched the pilot, however, and didn't miss an episode since.


    Since the pilot was the last episode aired, that wasn't very hard to do.

    Fox is stupid.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  23. Sci-Fi channel's problem.... by stuartkahler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is that they don't really even seem interested in Sci-Fi. John Edwards, Scare Tactics and the bounty of 'B' quality horror movies make up the majority of their lineup. They only seem to put up 2 hours of quality sci-Fi per week. Babylon 5, Stargate SG1, Farscape, Outer Limits... In the past 5 years they have had very few good Sci-Fi shows considering that they are called the Sci-Fi Channel.

    I think if they had any real sense, they would negotiate hard for syndication rights for good, recent Sci-Fi shows that started on broadcast TV, or recent quality movies. How come TNN can get Star Trek:tNG, and the best that the 'Sci-Fi' channel can do is the ancient original with Kirk? They never seem to get a movie less than 10 years old that grossed more than 10 million in the theaters. In fact, alot of the movies they show had to bypass the theaters because they're so bad.

    Sci-Fi's problem is that they think only single, dateless dorks would like Sci-Fi. They usually only have 2-3 hours of programming each week to promote their good shows in (on good weeks, no less). This is their 7-10 slot on Friday, the no-date loser slot where regular networks put their crappy shows. Sci-Fi thinks this is the best time to run their top-notch programming. There really isn't any reason to tune in any other time, so you only find out about their new shows if you are already very into one of their current shows.

  24. old news... by Artifex · · Score: 2, Informative
    It was announced on the Firely: Immediate Assistance mailing list some time ago:
    2003-03-26 15:29:49 Firefly on DVD? (articles,slashback) (rejected)

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  25. Re:Who did the special FX (graphics) for Firefly? by rakaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Zoic Studios does the CG for Firefly, Angel and Buffy (all Mutant Enemy shows).

    Zoic was started in 2002 by Loni Peristere who previously worked for Radium and Digital Magic. Mutant Enemy already worked with Loni when he worked for Digital Magic and moved at the same time as Loni to Radium, so it is not a coincedence ME decided to move to Zoic after Loni left Radium.

    More information about Firefly CG

  26. Blooper Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  27. Firefly was the ship class by zzottt · · Score: 2, Informative

    it had a rep for being an illegal transport, because it had lots of places to hide things, if i remember correctly.

  28. Re:Damn Straight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    re TV->DVD market -- part 3, profit!!, is questionable

    First, when Millennium was ended, DVDs were not really all the rage, esp. full TV series releases. The cost to go to DVD was probably far higher than it is now. The transition to go to DVD was not on people's minds immediately (see third).

    Second, Fox probably was trying to sell the series to some sort of syndication like market, for reruns, which is the traditional faire. They tend to make more money this way.

    Third, if they killed the series so badly as you think, you honestly believe there was someone with a clue who cared about the series at Fox? Hardly.

    Fourth, the contracts they may have signed may have been dependent on a certain amount of time before going to VHS or DVD. Or a number of years to try to sell before going to syndication. Time passed, now coming out with a DVD looks less bright, and in retrospect not coming out with the video sooner was a mistake. Maybe they had something else in the pipe, like a holding agreement on the video release of the series.

    Fifth, they could have looked at the economics and seen that while assured sales figures were high (the fringe fan market if you will), the other potential buyers were iffy enough not to warrant the risk (lame excuse in my book).

    Personally, I agree with you--stuff should go to DVD sooner. Millennium would probably have been a success; even now, still. Babylon5 come out after years on DVD (was on VHS) and seems to be doing reasonably, despite the time to DVD was a while and there is a dichotomy in whether people liked that show. Then again, I'm one of those people that think Season 5 of Farscape could have been a sequential release DVD and been able to recoup the costs of shooting season 5 plus some small profit (although interest lost from the time to sales might not have made it viable)--iow, release a DVD with 2-3 shows, wait until sales reach figures that recoup the shooting costs for those episodes (so people buy, knowing they support the show, and limit pirating) + 3/22 of that amount (since the last DVD released doesn't have this guarantee), release the next in line, etc., until all 22 episodes were released.

  29. Why does Fox have to cancel all its good shows? by etcshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's really very sad and disturbing. Fox honestly seems to develop some of the best and most original shows that hit TV these days, along with some of the absolute worst crap. Why do they nearly always choose the crap over the good stuff?

    Firefly is a great example. Do I have to mention Futurama? What about Andy Richter being taken off the air for this godawful crap "The Pits"?

    *Sigh*.

    --
    :Wq
    Not an editor command: Wq
    1. Re:Why does Fox have to cancel all its good shows? by Brett+Johnson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe Fox will release Andy Richter Controls the Universe on DVD, so we can finally see all of the unaired episodes. There were 3 or 4 episodes from last year that never aired, as well as 6 or so from this year that were judged too smart and funny for public consumption.

  30. Re:Isn't that what I said? by cynan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think if you read the full posting you'll see that they were actually destroyed. The wording was, "They did not fold and hold them..." They could certainly be rebuilt, though. And the latest glimmer of hope came just last week.

  31. Re:Isn't that what I said? by cynan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think that's the first time I've ever heard someone say "goddamn" when talking about Firefly.

  32. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Eskarel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    hmm, lets see.

    Freedom, well depending on how you define this, we used to have this, though we have significanlty less now than we did two years ago and are looking at even less. We're actually going to get Big Brother watching us pretty damned soon(TIAO), and I personally can't think of anything less free than that, especially since we're not even getting anything in return.

    Wealth, well you can get wealth if you're born into the right family, or if you luck out, and assuming you measure wealth entirely by unecessary material objects. Of course this wealth comes at the price of making sure that at least several hundred other people don't get any of that wealth. Capitalism survives because it's likethe lottery, it offers people an astronomically low chance of upward social mobility which keeps the poor in line while not upsetting the rich.

    Progress may as well be wiped off the list immediately since it's both hard to define and hard to place a value on, one man's progress is another's degeneration.

    best of the best is merely American arogance, if you don't think there's anything wrong with America, then you've got to look around at the world outside you.

    As for your arguments against socialism, we aren't all that far from the first two(though we're slaves to the protection of "democracy and freedom", neither of which we really have), we're in an economic recession which sort of implies at least temporarily the last two

    That's not to say socialism is the answer either, Marxism is just as based on rampant materialism as capitalism is, and yes of course several millions of people have been murdered by communist systems, as they have by fascist systems, monarchic systems, and even supposedly democratic systems, people aren't terribly nice to each other. Nor does Marxist socialism actually exist now or previously in it's theorized form anywhere on the globe. That said, Marxism though it is certainly a failed ideology, it is a step in the right direction(if you don't believe this, look at how many socialist style reforms have been introduced into the united states and how many of your freedoms depend on those, particularly economically). There is value in working towards the good of the many rather than solely for your own gain, just as there is value in having the state play a much larger role in protecting the people from the economic excesses of big buisness.

    I personally have almost zero faith in my own(American) politcal system, and just about the same amount in that of other countries.

  33. Re:MOD PARENT UP! by Eskarel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry missed a hit, soma comes from the book brave new world by Aldous Huxley. If you had read said book, it critiques a society which places primary emphasis on physical enjoyment and consumption and was a critique not of Socialism or Communism, but of the future of capitalist and in particularAmerican society. That is all.

  34. Re:Awesome! by Sgt_Jake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agreed, that show kicked ass.

    I signed up for a "fan club" over it, something I've never been a member of. Ever. In my entire (30 something) life. I don't even like TV, I'm only a moderate fan of sci-fi, but this show was so good overall I actually wrote a snail-mail to Fox (email too of course).
    So good in fact that I procured the aired episodes via pirate channels, something I've never done for music or movies. Not out of some moral obligation, mind you, I've just had better things to do than shuffle around the net looking for crap to fill my brain with or waste my money on. As it is I got horrible copies (including the weather alerts and ghosting of the signal from whomever recorded it) - and I've watched them twice.

    In fact, I've had a hard time finding anyone who DIDN'T like it -- at least for those who saw it since they jerked the schedule around so much. I know it was expensive to produce (2 mil per episode), but it had better ratings that the X-Files' first season (a show I only caught by accident). And that was with the scheduling snafu's... says something about the show and it's ability to flourish if given half a chance.

    Another note, I've heard even FOX knows they screwed up, they just think it's too late to save now. In any case, yeah, I'll pick up clean copies. Bastards.

    Sgt_Jake