Slashdot Mirror


UPS to Deploy Ultra-Connected Wireless Handhelds

Lyle E. Dodge writes "According to this article at Yahoo.com Symbol Technologies announced (on Tax Day of all days) that in 2004 UPS would deploy 70,000 handheld delivery computers based on Symbol's Fourth Generation hardware. Color screens, 128 megs of RAM, and uber-connected (GPS, GPRS, CDMA, WiFi, Bluetooth, Infrared, Analog modem), and, of course, the familiar barcode scanner. The obvious /. question is: Can we run Linux on Brown? Maybe UPS can fund an OSS startup, "BrownHat"? We'll see..."

160 comments

  1. Picture by chennes · · Score: 5, Informative

    What good is a slashdot article without a picture?

    1. Re:Picture by digital+bath · · Score: 1, Funny

      Spiffy. I bet they get to play tetris on that thing...

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    2. Re:Picture by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      What does private use mean? ;-)
      groan...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    3. Re:Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what good is a picture if slashdot links to it?

    4. Re:Picture by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Ugh, man.. do they ever need a hand model.. look at those fingernails! I mean... augh... I think I'm gonna be sick..

    5. Re:Picture by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      What does private use mean? ;-)

      I guess it means you can't use it on your "pay for porno" site.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:Picture by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I had to laugh when I saw your comment. I wasn't aware nerds had such good manicures, or cared. I didn't notice the nails until I went back. Didn't seem that bad to me, but I guess we all have their peeves.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:Picture by PD · · Score: 1

      Strange, first thing I noticed was that ultramodern abcde keyboard layout. I wonder if it's faster than qwerty.

    8. Re:Picture by dodgly · · Score: 1

      Uhhh...there is a picture in the version of the Yahoo page I see.

      --
      Lyle E. Dodge
      slashdot.org@lyledodge.com
  2. My Q by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The obvious /. question is: Can we run Linux on Brown?

    Hmmmm, and I thaught the question was can we run tetris on this?

    __
    cheap web site hosting

    1. Re:My Q by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1

      No, the question is whether we can write Tetris for this.

    2. Re:My Q by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      If it can run a linux distro then I'm sure someone will port a tetris clone to it.

    3. Re:My Q by DMDx86 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So between sleeping and smashing my packages they can play tetris too?

    4. Re:My Q by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      At the request of the package jockeys, UPS engineers are adding a "Squishability factor" to the blocks to make the game more lifelike.

    5. Re:My Q by brakk · · Score: 1

      I think the real question is can you run linux on all their old handhelds that they are going to be getting rid of?

  3. Linux, yes, but you forgot... by gpinzone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we port MAME to it?

  4. Maybe I am missing something by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 1
    but isn't that exact same picture on the site on the left hand side? In fact it is even bigger. Are we all so trained to automatically skip the spaces on the page that we think might be adds at first glance?

    Anyway it shows for me.

    __
    cheap web site hosting

  5. Up to the minute tracking information by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 3, Funny

    So next time something like this happens, it will be possible to see who or what is responsible, right?

    1. Re:Up to the minute tracking information by BlackListedCard · · Score: 1

      I have been fighting with Canada Post and the U.S. for a insured package that was in a thousand pieces. Both say it's the other guy that should pay. The insurance coverage was for $525.00U.S. They keep telling me that they are backlogged. Three years.... They inquirying if I have the claim number and the paper work. I just respond that I made photocopies of the originals. They always respond, "oh.."

  6. UPS and OSS by SiMac · · Score: 5, Insightful
    UPS does not like OSS. I can say that for certain.

    A few months ago, I developed a package tracking application for Mac OS X. Since I had just done this in my free time, and I didn't really feel like selling it, I decided to make this application open source. My original plug-ins communicated to the package trackers via HTML, but it soon became apparent that the websites changed quickly enough to make this more difficult than I had first imagined.

    Since this was an application, and not a package tracker, I couldn't use a regular e-commerce account. I emailed FedEx and they gave me the proper key and information necessary to use their XML service. UPS, however, was not so nice. I got an email that stated:
    Our current license agreement does not support open source, and we are only able to authorize the use of the tools if the product cannot be altered in any way by subsequent users, including resellers.

    So, UPS is certainly not a fan of open source. My current UPS plug-in breaks rather often, but there's not much I can do about it, given UPS's stance on this issue.
    1. Re:UPS and OSS by anonymous+loser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did it occur to you that perhaps UPS didn't write their own software, and are limited by their license agreement with the vendor? That's what it sounds like to me.

    2. Re:UPS and OSS by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can second that - UPS' XML interface is needlessly complicated and very unreliable. I implemented it as part of my ordering page and it was a disaster. It worked okay during testing and for the first couple weeks of deployment, but then their servers started going offline for 2-3 hours a day. Many sales were lost. Why, in the name of god, should an application have to go over the public Internet in order to get rate quotes and ship packages? UPS' own software doesn't do this, so why do they force their customers to use an inferior system?

      The main thing I needed from it was their rate calculator. After much digging around on their web site and several calls to my account rep, I finally found their rate tables. They came in tab delimited format which was great, except these spreadsheets were not suitable for automated processing because there were many formatting inconsistencies - the data was obviously maintained by hand.

      To make a long story short, in the end I was able to make some perl scripts for looking up domestic and international rates using those files, without having to go across the net. But I wasted a LOT of time finding out out how badly their XML interface sucks, and we still don't have a solution for automated shipping - only rate quotes.

      When it comes to software, UPS is as clueless as it gets. I'm going to be getting set up with Fedex soon and if they're any better software-wise, it will be my pleasure to drop UPS.

    3. Re:UPS and OSS by SiMac · · Score: 1

      This software is definitely developed exclusively for UPS. Who would sell a XML server for package tracking that only connects to UPS's system? Anyway, even if someone else did develop the software, why would the vendor put any restrictions on which end users could use it? It's not like it's a chunk of code; it's an XML API that requires an account to connect.

    4. Re:UPS and OSS by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

      I've used UPS's XML service for not only tracking, but also order processing and have had few problems. The XML gets a little complicated because it has some powerful features (especially for order processing).

      I'd be interested in knowing if anyone has created any shipping solutions with the Fed Ex API. I've looked at it, but it didn't look nearly as nice as what UPS had.

    5. Re:UPS and OSS by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't attest to how well or poorly they work, but CPAN has Business::UPS and Business::FedEx modules.

      perl -MCPAN -e \
      'readme Business::UPS;
      readme Business::FedEx::DirectConnect;
      '

    6. Re:UPS and OSS by bluGill · · Score: 1

      That is their own fault though!

      Part of buying a product is making sure that it will fit your needs. When you buy a product for external customers to interact with, many of whom are likely to want to do so automaticly, then you need to make sure that your requirements include the ability for customers to automatic their processes using whatever means they want.

      Saying that licenses are a restriction is a cop out. If this was data only intended for use internall to UPS, then not being open source compatable is something they need to decide if they care about, and if not, they deal with. However this is intended for use external to UPS, and therefore to say that open source can't be supported just shows that they failed specify requriements.

    7. Re:UPS and OSS by netllama · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that's not the case. I used to work for UPS, and *ALL* of their apps are developed inhouse. The company is one of the largest MS whores around, and drinks the MS anti-Linux FUD as if its religion. About 3 years ago they were solidly a NT4 (workstation & server) company, and were avidly doing their best to phase all other 'legacy' OS's (Novell, OS/2, SunOS).

    8. Re:UPS and OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to software, UPS is as clueless as it gets. I'm going to be getting set up with Fedex soon and if they're any better software-wise, it will be my pleasure to drop UPS.

      If you expecting the FedEx Software to be better your in for a big surprise. Relativly speaking the UPS shipping software is the best out of all the offerings the big 3 provide (Airborne, FedEx, UPS).

      Kinda sad really...

    9. Re:UPS and OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely true, some of the inhouse development work and applications run on unix based systems.

      UPS is primarily a windows house though, as much as I try to make them see the light...

    10. Re:UPS and OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on which FedEx API you use. The 'ShipManager' API is not XML, it's old-school EDI, but at least they provide a utility class that makes generating/parsing the EDI stream easy to do. If you can't write your own SSL code, they provide a proxy server to do it for you.
      I've worked with the API's supplied by UPS, FedEx, Airborne, and USPS. All but FedEx are XML based. Regardless, all have been reliable under very heavy (major e-commerce site) loads.

  7. Going nowere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Can we run Linux on Brown? Maybe UPS can fund an OSS startup, "BrownHat"? "

    New slogans: "When it absolutely positively has to blow chunks." or "BrownHat: when neither your time nor package is worth anything"

    1. Re:Going nowere. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Maybe UPS can fund an OSS startup, "BrownHat"? We'll see..."

      I was thinking more along the lines of "BrownStripe", but that's just me.

    2. Re:Going nowere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can we run Linux on Brown? Maybe UPS can fund an OSS startup, "BrownHat"? "

      No Way! It would deffinately be "BrownShorts"

    3. Re:Going nowere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that "Brownhatter" is slang in some parts of the world for a homosexual I can`t see too many people wanting to be called a "Brownhatter".

  8. How by Subnirvana337 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this any different from the black and white touch pads they had before? It may have all the gizmos and gadgets, but is it needed? Are they going to be more productive now?

    1. Re:How by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen the current ones take down information, but until they get to their shipping outlet the information doesn't go anywhere.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:How by Subnirvana337 · · Score: 1

      Hmm...data getting back to UPS faster is nice, but if the customer has it already, why does is the data more treasured then? Their scanning facilities are nice, because it'll tell you where your package is in (city, state, en route etc etc) So getting the post data shouldnt be that important, should it?

    3. Re:How by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      The data I really want, as a receiver, is to know whether or not UPS has already made a delivery attempt today or not (If I haven't been around) so that I know if I should go home and wait or not...

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    4. Re:How by Deluge · · Score: 1

      actually the minute the driver pops the board into a cradle in his truck, the new info's downloaded from the board via IR and sent through a cell network to the UPS computers. So tracking info should usually be accurate within a few minutes.

    5. Re:How by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      With the current hardware? Would be nice if it worked, but the last few packages I've received they didn't show as being received until 6-8pm that night (local time)

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    6. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I depends upon what corner of the world you live in. Varies widely across the US as well, but the Gen III DIAD has built in wireless modems that can update package information as the driver is walking back to the truck.

  9. Fedex one step ahead by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Last week the Fed-ex guy showed up with one of these things.

  10. "Ultra-Connected Wireless Handhelds" by Fjornir · · Score: 3, Funny
    OK... Ultra-Connected Wireless Handhelds

    Which is it?

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  11. Geocaching for lazy people? by iabervon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Yes, I'd like you to pick up a package at these GPS coordinates, and ship it to me. I have no idea what it will be."

    On the other hand, it would be kind of neat to have UPS deliver something to the location output from your GPS. Driving down the highway, the UPS truck honks at you, you pull over, and the driver gives you the books you bought online...

    1. Re:Geocaching for lazy people? by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Actually, that'd probably kinda freak me out...

    2. Re:Geocaching for lazy people? by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Kinda reminds me of the movie Seven.

      Yes, I'd like this box delivered to these GPS coordinates at exactly 7 PM tomorrow.

    3. Re:Geocaching for lazy people? by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

      That could be kind of interesting.. UPS Dodge Vipers flying down the highway trying to catch up ;)

    4. Re:Geocaching for lazy people? by alexburke · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it would be kind of neat to have UPS deliver something to the location output from your GPS. Driving down the highway, the UPS truck honks at you, you pull over, and the driver gives you the books you bought online...

      Theodore Kaczynski would love this...

  12. qwerty? by natefanaro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    looks good. The only con (to me) about it is that the keyboard isn't qwerty. I'm sure getting used to the layout wouldn't take much time but for people that are really used to qwerty may have a tough time with it.

    1. Re:qwerty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They might be hard to get used to for new people, but the drivers are already used to this layou. It is the same layout of the previous two generations of handhelds they've been using.

  13. Alternatives to this device by elitman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Have a look @ TI's WANDA platform for a cool reference design similar to this. I played with the platform at the CTIA show last month, and the company that put it together for TI, Accellent, had working prototypes in cases ready to go.

    The best part about WANDA: it's $130 for the integrated board. Add a battery, display and a few controls, and you could have whatever kind of PDA you wanted.

    Additionally, Metrowerks has been working to get their OpenPDA Linux distribution (formerly Lineo's) working on WANDA.

    Symbol has a less than stellar track record of opening up their devices to alternative technologies, and their licensing relationship with Microsoft all but guarantees that you'll never see them shipping a Linux or Symbian device from them.

    1. Re:Alternatives to this device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The device is going to be almost certainly a Pocket PC based terminal. So it would be quite posible to put linux on it. But I imagine it is expensive an not available to anyone but UPS. There was at least one customer in the past that did port Linux to a Symbol terminal (do a web search). So they would help if the quanity was right. Symbol will make any kind of terminal if the money is right.

  14. PalmOS maybe? by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    Palm just announced that the next gen would support 128Meg Symbol currently has 5 palm based handhelds.

  15. Shipping, Tracking, Wireless OpenSource Rodeo... by csg · · Score: 5, Informative
    Disclaimer: I work for FedEx, my comments are my own.

    From the Article Link: The incorporation of three different types of radio communication links in each unit will ensure that package delivery information is available to customers almost instantaneously...

    FedEx has done this sort of real-time updates on packages since the early 1980's when we started using the DADS radio network. Thats right, back when I was using an Apple IIe, and many slashdoter's weren't even in Kindergarten, FedEx had near-time tracking updates on packages. Let's not act like it's rocket science.

    As for running Linux on the device, that's not really important, except for a coolness factor. I do know that FedEx has many projects headed towards Linux and OpenSource.

    Funding an Open Source startup seems silly too. Why not just hire experienced Open Source talent. That's what we've been doing @ FedEx. Seems to work pretty well provided the hacker-types can live in the business-type environment. 200k person companies aren't for everybody.

    Anyways.. I digress. Cool hand-held custom built. Neat. They still call themselves "brown" and that speaks for itself. ;-)

  16. BrownHat? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    I would think the more logical name would be "BrownShorts"... well, it's not as bad as some distro names out there.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:BrownHat? by presearch · · Score: 1

      Bring me my brown shorts!!

  17. I can see it now by Spoticus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Future CNN reports about dozens of UPS delivery people are getting mugged by redbull-toting geeks who want to nab these puppies and create beowulf clusters of them...

  18. Does this mean? by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that I can get a package delivered to my house without taking a week off from work?

    We'll be there between 8:30AM and Thursday

    The other day, they stopped delivering packages without signature (they'd never had me sign anything before... just left it on the back porch). Then all of a sudden, then started playing by the rules and I realized how inconvenient it is to try to get a shipment.

    Now, I have to call and tell my credit card company that I am shipping to my work address every time that I need something delivered.

    Sigh...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're anything like FedEx, I believe you can call and tell them to leave it without a signature.

    2. Re:Does this mean? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Now, I have to call and tell my credit card company that I am shipping to my work address every time that I need something delivered.

      Actually you don't. Just call your credit card company ONCE and have them add your business address permanantly as an alternate to your billing address. I have both my shop and another company listed with my credit card company, plus the home that is the billing address. I just order, decide which one, and it goes through. All the verification does is see if the address is listed, it can be more than one.

      Quite convenient since I ship to all three addresses on the same card, depending on what the item is.

      On your other point: My regular UPS guy never gets me to sign. If there is a substitute, he always requires me to sign. I haven't figured out why yet.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Does this mean? by Deluge · · Score: 1

      What they basically tell the drivers is to use their best judgment when deciding whether to release packages. Some drivers are idiots, what can you do, but most try to be responsible in this.

      Releasing envelopes and small packages to between the main door and the screen door is probably the most common thing, and leaving stuff on the porch where it can be seen by passers by is usually by arrangement (even informal, where the customer tells the driver it's ok).

      Leaving computers and anything that can easily be identified as valuable is usually a no-no.

      As far as you suddenly having to sign things: The UPS shipping software allows you to specify a signature required package - and the sig. required clause is actually IN the barcode - so when the driver scans the package, the DIAD will beep at him and tell him that he has to get a signature and possibly get picture ID to verify that the consignee is 19+. And it will NOT allow you to driver-release. And it won't let you deliver to to your neighbors' either. So the driver has no choice but to write up a sticker and take the package/envelope back.

      Assuming that these packages AREN'T the sig. req'd type, then just email UPS and tell'em you'd like your shipments released on your back porch and they'll get the driver to do it - since they have your request sitting on their computers.

    4. Re:Does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPS once left my new 19" Viewsonic LCD monitor(In it's factory box, with a nice, big Viewsonic logo on it!)on my doorstep, under the doormat. This happened at about 6:00pm on a Friday night, after I had gone out for the night. It sat there until Noon on Saturday......mind you, this is at an apartment complex, in Long Beach, CA!

  19. Re:UPS and OSS-"Fragile" when examined. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our current license agreement does not support open source, and we are only able to authorize the use of the tools if the product cannot be altered in any way by subsequent users, including resellers."

    So does that mean that the "authorized" versions have to be rewritten alot? Doesn't look like a picnic for the closed-source guys either.

  20. Looking at the picture.. by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

    I'm striken by the things that usually strikes me as I look at gizmos that has a 'keyboard-look-a-like-input-thingy' - why do so many people designing such gizoms where text entry is important insist of laying out the 'keyboard' like "A B C D E etc"? I mean, come on people, Psion has shown us that is is easy to put in a QWERTY-layout keyboard (or DOVRAK, if you prefer) on a handheld device. For me, and I have tried a handfull of small formfactor keyboards, you can't get better in a small package than the Series5mx. Even the old Series3 looks to have a better keyboard than this new gizmo the UPS will start using.

    I know, I'm ranting a bit, but it is something I feel is important; but then, I prefer using the keyboard over the mouse most days to move about on the computer.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:Looking at the picture.. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      why do so many people designing such gizoms where text entry is important insist of laying out the 'keyboard' like "A B C D E etc"? I mean, come on people

      That is because the current line of UPS handhelds have a keyboard in that way. One reason for using an alphabetical keyboard vs qwerty is to slow down people and make sure they are keying in things correctly. Air Traffic Controllers used to use (and some still do) a keyboard called an ARTS keyboard. It is layed out in an ABCD format and the keys are in a grid and not staggered like a standard keyboard. Forcing the controller to slow down and pay attention when keying in data is essential to avoiding mistakes in the air.

    2. Re:Looking at the picture.. by MobileDude · · Score: 1

      --designing such gizoms where text entry is
      --important insist of laying out the 'keyboard'
      --like "A B C D E etc"?

      You have to consider the workforce intended to use the device -- not what you think should go into it.

      Most mobile workers (blue collar, field service, delivery, etc.) do not 'touch-type' and thus have no clue re: a QWERTY keyboard.

      Sure, over time they would learn, but how would you like to be the ops dept wondering why productivity is in the toilet during a new rollout which may take years (especially with 70,000 units)?

      --
      10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
  21. Typists by minusthink · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how fast someone begins to type on this thinger, once they have used it for a while?

    is easier (or maybe harder?) to start typing at a reasonable rate since its layout is fimilar (A B C ....)

    I suppose anyone who programmed on their calculator during math class can answer this too. ( I always had the serial cable :D )

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    1. Re:Typists by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I suppose anyone who programmed on their calculator during math class can answer this too.

      I wrote a two-player Chess game for my TI-82 (mostly) during math class. After awhile, you kinda get used to the buttons.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Typists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The software used in the device minimizes the amounts of keystrokes required to use the device. The alphanumeric keypad will probably be "typed" on about 1% of it's lifetime.

  22. New Toys == Better Service? by telstar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I've had nothing but problems receiving UPS packages. I've had packages that were never delivered, packages damaged in transit, and I had to go meet a delivery man on a corner one time because he said he couldn't find my address. My apartment was in a town with a numbered grid of streets ... so I'm not sure where the confusion was. I'm all for Brown getting some new toys so long as it means I get my packages faster.

    1. Re:New Toys == Better Service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use to work for a company that contracts for ups.
      I can tell you, that I have seen packages thrown and carelessly handled. I ship always ship fed ex now

  23. Try shipping anything damageable through UPS by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then see how you feel about them.

    1. Re:Try shipping anything damageable through UPS by EdMcMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      As opposed to what, exactly? I don't have any indestructible objects laying around.

    2. Re:Try shipping anything damageable through UPS by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      My telescope showed up just fine.

      I've had monitors go through just fine.

      In fact, I don't think I've ever had a package fucked up.

      Postal system has lost one on me though.

  24. Going wireless inside too... by quandrum · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, internally UPS has been "wireless" for years. I work as a "Loader" packing boxes into 18-wheeler type trucks. (Whenever I just say trucks, people assume the brown ones they see on the street.) We have to scan the barcode on every box and the device we use is wireless and straps on teh wrist, with a scanner eye on our hand. However, the tech used is circa '94 and often the things have lots of problems connecting. Can be a problem.

    In may, these systems will be replaced with a system with better wireless performance. And the eye piece will be wireless too, so we can wear the computer on our hip.

    1. Re:Going wireless inside too... by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I helped deploy the Symbol technology in the South Florida District a few years ago and we were one of the original beta sites. We had lots of problems with the scanners dropping into "batch mode" and sometimes locking up. Battery issues were also common. The sort shifts were around 3-4 hours but the batteries, though rated for that length, didn't really live up to the claims. Still, the technology was still fairly cutting edge during the delployment.

      Eventually the technology was supposed to help loaders determine which packages went into each feeder, but this would require more information (such as destination zip code, service level) to be present on each barcode; or, have some way for the scanners to query a central database in real-time. It would also allow packages to be "intercepted" and rerouted at a request from the shipper.

      Anyhow, the technology that lets a relatively low performance terminal (in this case a wearable scanner) query a much more powerful server (PC or even mainframe) is pretty cool. There's a very, very strong case for putting Linux on these devices rather than some other proprietary solutions.

    2. Re:Going wireless inside too... by quandrum · · Score: 1
      Eventually the technology was supposed to help loaders determine which packages went into each feeder

      Seriously, this was needed a long time ago. The standard for UPS is that 1 in 2000 boxes is allowed to be missorted (Sent to the wrong destination.) I've been told each one costs the company between 10 and 60 dollars.(extra transit + customer refund) At millons of packages shipped every day, this has to be one of their biggest expenses. And it would be so easy to implement some form of computer check. Relying on us Loaders while expecting us to load at a break-neck pace is only a recipe for disaster. (At Xmas, our area had a missort frequency of about 1 in 200!)

      Okay, so doing almost entirely manual labor all alone for four hours a day leaves me plenty of time to redesign the whole system in my head.

    3. Re:Going wireless inside too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, 1 for 200? In my hub they'd chew us out for that to no end. I really hate the scanners we have at the moment. Constant drops into batch mode (could be fixed if they would deploy more AP's) and thus packages go missing if the scanner logs out.

      And i really do agree, a system is needed to catch missorted packages. At the moment the sorting staff is a joke. That's the reason a new hub in our area is almost completely automated. Everything was cut save for loaders and unloaders. Too bad the system gets shut down on a weekly basis because the plant engineers can't figure out reversing the polarity on a motor makes it run backwards. Took them 8 hours to figure that one out....

    4. Re:Going wireless inside too... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      And it would be so easy to implement some form of computer check.

      I think that if it were being designed from scratch it would be almost trivial to implement this. The problem is that there are thousands upon thousands of shipping sites, and many of them have the traditional barcodes that contain only a package ID and service level information. There's no destination ZIP or "extra" information that will tell where the package gets routed. This means that the system would have to, as the package is being sorted, query a central database over the spotty wireless link. This must happen for millions of packages in a three-four hour sort span. As you know this won't work.

      The alternative is to overload the package bar code with all this information. The scanner unit would then only need to maintain a database of ZIPs that are correct for a particular feeder. It would then produce a warning beep if the package is incorrect (such as a NDA package being loaded into a ground vehicle or an incorrect ZIP entirely). These high-information barcodes are being used in some facilities that have automated sorting machines (e.g., Bullfrog).

    5. Re:Going wireless inside too... by Xenonax · · Score: 1

      Indeed it would be trivial to implement a misload prevention system if the scanning system were being designed from scratch. But, I do see hope in the next generation of scanners.

      As I understand it, UPScan scanners are supposed to be using 803.11b wireless networking for connecting back to the servers rather than radio transceivers. That right there helps the reliability of the data transmission and should provide for the possibility of transmitting more data quicker to and from the scanners.

      Now, to provide the loader information as to whether a package should or shouldn't go into a feeder automatically, there must be some way that the system knows where the packages that the loader is scanning go. Much of this information is in UPS databases as it is uploaded from customer sites either before or shortly after the package is shipped.

      Now the problem is not having the data, it is accessing the data. If every site operated by querying a central database, that server would probably get overloaded fairly quickly. So, I think that most of the data must be located in local servers rather than a centralized one.

      Ideally the information about the packages already scanned to a feeder would go to the next operation's servers so that their systems could utilize the data efficiently. Also, the packages coming in from package cars or TDPs should be routed to the local server by the system. If there were some not scanned to the feeder or otherwise not in the local system, then the centralized database could be queried without too much of a burden. The only problem is what to do with the packages that don't have any information in the system?

  25. When I worked at UPS by Pettifogger · · Score: 3, Informative
    I used to work for UPS back in 1991-1992 down in LA, and was one of the DIAD Techs that they had.

    For what it's worth, this new model looks a whole lot better than the original. For starters, it's a lot smaller, not to mention all the wireless capabilities. You used to have to "dock" the DIADs in big metal racks and spend a lot of time getting information on and off of them each night. That took quite a bit of time.

    I don't know if they still use it, but back then, the DIAD system was run under OS/2, which is why I'm still a fan of that OS.

    The only thing I'm curious about is the durability of these units. The original DIADs were pretty good, however, a significant drop or other mistreatment would either knock it out or send it into "bootloader" mode. And it was a pain to have deliveries done on paper.

    Anyway, this one looks pretty good- it almost makes me want to go back so I can play with them. Then again, the current carrer track is a whole lot more profitable.

    --

    IAAL

    1. Re:When I worked at UPS by Deluge · · Score: 1

      The DIAD system is under Win now, though the sort scanners are still under OS/2 (at least in our center).

      As for durability, we're still on DIAD IIs, and I've seen them take some pretty nasty falls and survive - worst I ever saw was the LCD crack and go all black.

      I just hope that the new version gets signatures better than the old black pressure pads.

  26. bad joke...why, I never... by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 1

    It certainly isn't a BAD joke.

    1. Re:bad joke...why, I never... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly isn't a GOOD joke.

  27. neat but how do I .....? by frovingslosh · · Score: 0

    OK, it's really neat, but how do I steal one of these great toys if it has GPS in it and all those ways it can snitch on me and tell UPS where it is?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:neat but how do I .....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My best guess is wrap it in tin foil and then ground it. Sorry, I'm not an electrical engineer.

  28. Wearable Computer Stuff - Test environment by BlackListedCard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    UPS would be a great environment to test out the latest and greatest in Wearable Computer stuff. Feedback from the employees would help the development of the technology.

    1. Re:Wearable Computer Stuff - Test environment by quandrum · · Score: 1
      Actually, internally it might be too rough. Flesh wounds are a daily occurance and cardboard dust gets EVERYWHERE. Like, my chest is black with the stuff after 4 hours. Under a t-shirt and sweatshirt.

      I tried taking my iPod into work to listen to music while I worked. I swear it aged about 2 years in one day. Hasn't worked correctly since. And if you're talking about the drivers who stop by to drop off packages, what company in their right mind would beta test anything that had to interface with the customer. "I need your signature here ma'am. Dammit, another blue screen." that'll send 'em right to FedEx

    2. Re:Wearable Computer Stuff - Test environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flesh wounds are a daily occurance and cardboard dust gets EVERYWHERE. Like, my chest is black with the stuff after 4 hours. Under a t-shirt and sweatshirt.

      Jesus Christ! Imagine what that stuff is doing to your lungs!

  29. probably pretty good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's businesswire, not some geek's cable modem-hosted site.

  30. BrownHat FAQ by TV-SET · · Score: 1, Funny

    Q: How does one make BrownHat?
    A: One needs to put a lot of shit into RedHat. :)

    --
    Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
  31. Re:which UPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this post moderated down? It is not offtopic when there is an issue with unfair moderation, which is often the case on Slashdot.

  32. By the black porch? by AlbanySux · · Score: 1

    Your lucky.. When i get stuff delivered by UPS they don't even bother bringing it to the house! They leave at the bottom of the driveway! Even when the package SAYS signature required, even when its insured, regardless of whats in the box. Be it junk, clothing or computer parts. Fedex leaves it by the front door, which we never use. Today we "found" a package that had been sitting there for about a week without us knowing. So, I try to get stuff delievered at work too.

  33. linux...never by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The obvious /. question is: Can we run Linux on Brown? Maybe UPS can fund an OSS startup, "BrownHat"? We'll see..."

    Just to let you know: I work at UPS. Switching to Linux will never happen. UPS is a Microsoft joint. Plain and simple, and i really doubt they will ever switch. They have too many programs written for Windows and that seems to be all the developers know. And, what's really scary, too much stuff runs on Access. A company their size takes forever to roll out new equipment and software, heck, the system i work with (runs all the scanning in the hub) is still on OS/2. We are waiting for our new scanners, which will run on a Windows 2000-based system. The new scanners for hub use(loading trucks) will even be running Windows CE. No chance of tux invading this place.

    1. Re:linux...never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switching to Linux will never happen.

      Then have 'em switch to BSD.

    2. Re:linux...never by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 1

      Agreed, as the company I work in is involved with writing the UPS shipping software, I know they have no plans whatsoever to port it to Linux, let alone making it open source.

      Also, I worry about the security implications in using access and asp for their backend work. I know because I saw and worked on it.

      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    3. Re:linux...never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fact : *BSD is dying

      It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

      You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

      FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

      Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

      OpenBSD leader Theo De Raadt states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

      Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

      All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

      Fact: *BSD is dying

    4. Re:linux...never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I work for UPS. In our building we have Linux PC's running. Albeit this is our STAT team, which is a group of uber-programmers that test different "unapproved" software. I know that there is not CURRENT plans for Linux software, but there is also a think-tank group in Atlanta that is looking into Linux. Apparently the costs of using Microsoft in a company of 300k+ people is VERY expensive.

      So, you are correct in saying UPS has no definitive plans for Linux, but UPS is very slow and makes well educated decisions. Give us time and I am sure that their will be Linux solutions.

    5. Re:linux...never by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 1

      That's cool to know...i guess all the IS people in our district probably don't know anything about that. I've always thought that somewhere someone has to be thinking about using linux...since the costs for MS licensing has to be astronomical. You are very right about the slow and well-educated decisions...that's probably a reason why the company is so stable. Well, lets hope to see them use Linux somewhere, sometime!

    6. Re:linux...never by netllama · · Score: 1

      I worked for UPS about 3 years ago, in the ECR TSC. I wrote up a very detailed proposal for deploying a single Linux workstation for handling intradepartmental communications & archiving documents. It got shot down for 1 reason:
      * Linux is not an approved OS

      My management refused to even consider the merits of the proposal as they feared the repurcussions of deviating from the 'UPS way'.

    7. Re:linux...never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever think maybe it's mutually beneficial to both companies? Like maybe the world's largest courier and the world's largest software company support one another?

  34. Worldship cost? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    Does someone know the cost of UPS's "WorldShip" application? I don't know if this is developed in-house or not, but I would guess they want everyone to use it and this is why they won't help the competition. The most likely reasons being so everyone has to pay for it or to keep it consistent. I would guess the former....

    That said, I've had to deal with both installing it, and to a limited degree, using it. It feels like a poorly written VB app. Very amatuerish and unprofessional, IMO. And this is their "global" solution.

    1. Re:Worldship cost? by Dagett_Beaver · · Score: 1

      The WorldShip Application is FREE to anyone who wants to use it. That said, in order to use it you need to have a UPS account. It is ment to be a turn key solution that meets then needs of about 90 percent of their clients. If your needs are not met by the WorldShip App, there are lots of other options they provide.

  35. damnit by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I wanted one of those things until you showed me what it looks like!

    What I'd really like is a "graphing calculator keyboard" addon for my Zaurus. Maybe I could use a terminal program for my 82 or my 85; they wouldn't be much of a loss....

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  36. yes TTY kicks X11's ass by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    but text entry on PDAs is another matter.

    The zaurus has the best keyboard I've yet seen in a palmtop. Their new model has a "laptop style" folding k/b, but with only 32 mb of ram it isn't worth buying. Anyways, text entry for single words is fine, or even short memos, but try coding on it and you see the design flaws. Many special characters require the use of the on-screen k/b, and your thumb start to hurt after extended use.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  37. Symbol Technologies Incompetancy & Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Mark this OffTopic if necessary, but please read it.


    Take a peek at this as I would not at all trust Symbol Technolgies with anything IT related.
    Check the head lines here: Symbol Technologies in the news


    Take a look at this: Former Symbol Technologies Exec Pleads Guilty to Fraud. Its just the tip of the iceberg.
    Symbol Severance Assailed
    Critics: Delay $2M payment to ex-CEO

    I had worked for their manufacturing team on Long Island, NY from 97-99 & did web development/IT stuff for them from 99-2001. The IT management is clearly incompetent & personal greed (not even greed to make the company better) is their God. Since distribution of their own personal performance related bonuses hinged on how budgets were spent (IT hardware: replacement HDs, etc; salaries; job related tools: like having pagers or cell phones for those on call) they cut the budgets like MAD.

    They killed off pagers for the sysadmin team. Yet, they had to remain on call/available if necessary. They took IT staff on salary (off hourly wages) & then demanded that they work an absolute minimum of 45 hours a week. So some staff left & that meant that the work load for the existing staff went up but salaries didn't scale. "Oh, we can give you comp time." But the rub was that you have to ask permission to use your comp time. Since the work load went up, you can't use your comp time.

    They killed the budget for replacement hardware. They had a good system for deploying a PC (Norton Ghost or a hardware HD copier) but they had no $$$ to buy a new HD or a new switch 'cause the old one gets smoked on Monday logins.

    They ignored Java & ColdFusion as a means of developign internal systems and instead chose VB/ActiveX, MS IE, IIS, & even MS ACCESS for their three-tier system.

    They have moved 95% of all their manufacturing to Renosa, Mexico. This company used to run radio ads on how it has helped Long Island & specifically the town of Brookhaven. They laid off their manufacturing workforce (both engineering & assembly) in order to cuts manufacturing costs.

    TOMO RAZMILOVIC ex-CEO, This asshat ran the company into the ground & then gets a servance package. About half of the folks that were laid off received 2 months salary & then they got 6 months of New York State Unemployment. This jackass' contract gives him $2 million. WTF is up with that?!?!

  38. The REAL question is: by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Will they name it after Apple's naming convention (or the ipaq) and call it iBROWN or BROWN-i?

    1. Re:The REAL question is: by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Somebody suggested that Safari should have been named iBrowse.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  39. What I'd really like... by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is a way to access the system to find out where my driver is when he's got stuff for me. That way I could go meet him early and get it, instead of waiting for an afternoon delivery.

  40. symbol makes some cool handhelds by AssFace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    they are making a handheld barcode scanner that would be used for grocery shopping. as you walk along putting groceries in your cart, you scan it in to the scanner that you have.
    then when you check out, instead of them scanning all of your groceries, they just take your handheld device and plug it in to see how much your bill is.

    the obvious point that came up is how easily one could steal. so the store would instate a rule where they randomly scan all of someone's groceries.

    I, and apparently many others at the major grocery chains that were approached with this idea, was skeptical that people would steal like crazy.
    so there were a bunch of test stores that were setup with the system to see how well it works out, and apparently it worked really well - they saw less theft that way than they did the "normal" way and the main problem they actually had were people ringing the same item up multiple times (accidentally I presume).

    I don't recall the numbers off the top of my head as to how much faster this made the checkout process, but it was a very impressive number.
    every time I find myself standing in checkout lines and I see that they are using Symbol checkout scanning equipment (which is nearly every grocery store I've ever been in) - I always wish that they had that new personal scanner system.

    I haven't followed Symbol's stock in over two years, but they used to have a pretty solid system last I looked. not sure how they are lately.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:symbol makes some cool handhelds by MobileDude · · Score: 1

      --I haven't followed Symbol's stock in over two years,

      $35 to $10, upper echelon mgmt kicked/fired/leaving, SEC investigations, criminal/civil charges filed, accounting restatements coming from 1999, 200, and 2001 -- you tell me how they're doing...

      --
      10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
    2. Re:symbol makes some cool handhelds by AssFace · · Score: 1

      excellent!!

      it is good to see that they didn't get left out of the SEC investigations - I feel so bad for the companies that never get that joy.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:symbol makes some cool handhelds by Ratri · · Score: 1

      That is actually not a "new" idea for Symbol. I work for a grocery chain and one of our stores used to have a system like that, but it was very old. I don't even think it was 2 mb wireless. We have since taken it out, but the customers absolutely loved it when it was there.
      As far as Symbol making "cool" handhelds - yeah, they're cool as long as you don't care about them functioning reliably. We have thousands of their 6846 PDT units and the failure rate on them has been 20%-50% over the past 2 years of use. And of course, their solution to our unhappiness with this product is "Upgrade to our new PocketPC device!" Which, while I understand that their job is to try to sell us more stuff, is an extremely unhelpful suggestion. We'd be happier if the stuff they sold us initially worked the way it was supposed to.

  41. Technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    UPS Already owns a technology company - UPS AT. They (UPS AT) are not an "OSS" or an "OS" company, but they do have hardware and software skills to do the integration jobs and support truck tracking and also a fair amount of of avionics.

  42. The POWER of brown by unixwin · · Score: 1

    Scenario Time: anytime

    Location : Bathrooms all over the world

    Sounds : gasping and grunts from the bathroom...
    "uh", "brrrrrr...." .... "gasp!!???" , "ouch", (straining grunts...) , "brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr"
    "sighh..........aaaaaaaaaaaaahhh"


    aaahhhhh the POWER of brown

    --
    -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
  43. Re:Shipping, Tracking, Wireless OpenSource Rodeo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I too, work for FedEx. My comments are mine alone and aren't necessarily endorsed by my employer. Not logging in for a reason...

    I should mention that FedEx has had production devices sending data over the public radio networks for almost two years now, in addition to our private DADS radio network which has been around since the 1980s.

    In the US, we're using two-way pagers in densely-populated areas (NYC being the prime example) to upload package data. The holster for the EST (Enhanced SuperTracker, our courier device) has an IR transceiver in the bottom and a switch. When the courier drops the EST in the holster on his belt - the switch triggers an app on the pager to poll the EST, and boom, off goes the package data. And since that's the first thing they usually do after doing pickups or deliveries, you can imagine how quickly the data gets posted after the event.

    Also, I know that at least the Canadians are using their GPRS network to do something very similar, though I'm not sure of the specifics.

    It's really a pretty slick system all around. The EST was custom developed in-house for our specific needs, and there are 70-80k of these things around the world right now (and have been for nearly eight years now - their predecessors serving for a decade before that).

    Not to say we're not playing with new technology, too. Larger screens, Bluetooth, GPRS/CDMA, etc. are all in the future (and in our lab). However, I'll leave it to the suits to announce that sort of stuff.

  44. So what by melted · · Score: 1

    I've never had UPS lose a package on me, and fscking FedEx did it twice. UPS customer service is also a helluvalot better and their tracking actually reflects the location of your package most of the time (unlike FedEx's). If this new gear makes even 1% of improvement they'll still be FAR ahead of any other carrier in this country.

    1. Re:So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to say it.. but your experience does not match up with 90% of everyone else's experience with UPS..

      UPS deliveries are always slow, late, and the boxes always come with dents that were not there before.

      FedEx stuff always comes on time, or ahead of schedule in some cases, and my packages never show any signs of damage.

    2. Re:So what by MobileDude · · Score: 1

      So what?

      I'll tell you what - used to sell monitors from ubid.com on eBay.com (you'd be suprised the markup possible on those eBayers...)

      Had MULTIPLE customers inform me that UPS "rolled the monitor" into their home.

      NOT ON A DOLLY -- actually ROLLED the box end over end.

      25% damage rate and next thing you know I'm out of the monitor arbitrage business.

      UPS insurance? What a joke -- they should be jailed for their responses.

      That being said, yes, FedEx has been doing realtime for years. This "new" DIAD IV is just a smaller version with some new WAN features. Let's see if Symbol can deliver.

      Oh, by the way, I hear the batteries in Pepsi's custom (now the 8000) handheld units are lasting a whopping 2 months.... If true then ----- Doh!

      --
      10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
    3. Re:So what by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 1

      There seems to be major differences on UPS and Fed Ex at various geographic locations. For example, every computer I've shipped to Pittsburgh has suffered case damage. One had a sheared corner strut (that bit of angle-iron, except it's not iron =-).

      On the other hand, Fed Ex has not damaged a single shipment. And this is despite the fact that probably 75% of my computer shipements (including cases) are Fed Ex.

      I've also watched the UPS tracking system track my packages into and right back out of Pittsburgh, and had friends see the same. Then you have to wait for the package to get turned around and head back to Pittsburgh. In contrast, I once had Fed Ex forget to put my package on a truck for local delivery, and they gave me a choice to pick it up myself the same day. In fact, the Fed Ex office here is open later than the truck drivers work, so I can always pick up my package the same day if I'm not available for a signature. The UPS office here won't do that for me.

      The long and short of my point is that UPS sucks in Pittsburgh. I don't care to claim more than that, unless we start talking international shipping (in which case DHL is the champion). However, I've heard a few stories that went the opposite way (except for international shipping).

      -Paul Komarek

    4. Re:So what by Ratri · · Score: 1

      Let's see if Symbol can deliver.

      Oh, you took the words right out of my mouth. In my own experience with Symbol, while they generally do deliver eventually, it's rarely when they say it's going to be. One product in particular that my company purchased from them ( This 802.11b device) was delivered well over a year late, and when we got it, it wouldn't work with our (Cisco) wireless backbone.
      So while this device UPS is getting sounds pretty cool, I am rather skeptical that the rollout will be on schedule.

  45. possible solution by zogger · · Score: 3, Informative

    keep taking the deliveries at home, just get a nice decorative box that doubles as a seat (maybe, that's not important) with a liftable lid. Install a hasp and leave an unlocked padlock inside the box. Screw the box to the back of the PO box down the driveway. Tell the delivery guy to drop the packages in there and lock the box.

    If you don't want to build one, rubbermaid has an exterior folding lawn furniture container/box you can purchase, then it's just a matter of installing the lock. Then you don't have to worry about weather damage or having an obvious brown cardboard package sitting unattended in the front yard/down by the road whatever. I do that here but without the lock seeing as how it's so rural and there's a long private drive. If we aren't going to be home I just leave an empty rubbermaid square container like you can get at wallymart for 5$ in front of the front door, the private delivery guys all know to use that now, same with the rural post office carrier, I made a point to talk to all of them early on living here. I lost one really expensive hand signed hardback that was left hanging on the box in a bag, some fool snagged it,so I told the carrier NO WAY leave stuff down there anymore. Seems to work out OK. Shooting them a cold lemonade or a choke~a~cola on a hot day seems to work, too, heh. Honey/vinegar, binary choice there

    As to the PDAs, I still think for most purposes a small notebook is better, well, if you got older eyes. I really can't even see the small screens on cell phones or pdas all that well any more. My laptops are bad enough. I guess PDAs are OK, everyone here mostly seems to love them and be enthusiastic about them, so far now though I seem to get by without one. I might get one once they got 256 ram, a nice hard drive and cost 100 clams and are e-z to keep upgraded and run all open source. That wireless jazz is a definete plus. I'll put up with the toy screens and keyboards then.

  46. What about the old hardware by Voidfiles · · Score: 1

    I think the real question is what happens to all the handhelds that they have now, There must be tons of them and they look like some slick embedded hardware as is.

  47. Obligiatory UPS/FedEx Crash Post by DMDx86 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:Obligiatory UPS/FedEx Crash Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf is up with the moderators? got your panties in a bind? too much crack in your bong tonight?

      I thought that was pretty damned funny myself

  48. It would be Brown Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not Brown Hat

  49. Unless you're talking about FedEx Ground... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
    UPS is inferior. Their slogan "When it absolutely has to be there overnight" isn't just hot air. Ask any company that deals with time-sensitive documents, I can almost guarantee you they use FedEx. When I worked at UBS PaineWebber, we shipped most things via Airborne Express, because we had a cheap deal with them. Since Airborne Express is a crappy company, however, we also had an account with FedEx, which brokers could get special permission to use for things that "absolutely have to be there overnight."

    Now, if you were talking about FedEx Ground, you have to realize that FedEx Ground is a subsidiary, only somewhat tied to the parent company (it used to be called RPS). I agree that FedEx Ground is not up to the same standards as the rest of FedEx, but I've had my share of problems with UPS, too.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  50. Re:Shipping, Tracking, Wireless OpenSource Rodeo.. by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 1

    Maybe you can answer a Fed Ex tracking question for me. =-) The online Fed Ex tracking info often has high latency (long time between event, and posting of event on website) until the local delivery area is reached. I've never cared much, since it's only the local delivery that involves me directly.

    All the same, do you have any idea where this latency comes from? Sometimes it is more than 12 hours.

    -Paul Komarek

  51. Go to epinions.com by melted · · Score: 1

    And check it out yourself. Although both UPS and FedEx suck, UPS sucks much less. At least in Washington.

  52. Color choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Looks pretty cool, but BROWN? Didn't they get the message that brown is SO 1970s?

    Oh, wait, I get it...

  53. Re:What? by StarKruzr · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... how is this a troll?

    --

    +++ATH0
  54. Aaaaand...how is this better? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 0



    Color screens?

    128MB of RAM?

    Errr...It's a goddamn delivery truck, guys. At most, it's going to want to recieve instructions as to where to stop, where to pick up, where to drop off, where to refuel, where to avoid bad weather, and other such routing instructions...Do you really need this kind of horsepower for such tasks? More succinctly. What the hell makes this extravagant setup more useful than, say, a radio-dispatched truck with a simple dumb terminal?

    My guess is, nothing.

    Was at the Dallas/Ft. Worth airport last week when I came across a "next generation ATM". Color LCD touchscreen, stereo sound, headphone hookup, the works. The only problem is, from a functionality standpoint, the fucking thing sucked. The buttons on the touch-screen provided no tactile feedback, like a normal amber-screen ATM. Now only that, but the damn screen was laggy. It would be a good 1-2 seconds after you tapped a button on the screen before the next set of menu options appeared. Even on the screen where you punch in your PIN.. The fucking thing is powerful enough to play a little advertisement MPEG while it works, but it will fail to recognize numbers you poke in on the screen if you tap it in too fast. On a normal ATM, I could complete this entire transaction within just a few seconds. On this million-dollar hunk of shit, it took upwards of a minute and a half to communicate what I wanted from it.

    There, I said it. A million dollar hunk of shit. I propose we make an acronym of it. UPS is about to deploy a next-generation MDHOS system.

    Anyway, how is this an improvement? Simply put, it isn't. Sure, its more flashy, but it's a downgrade from a functionality standpoint. Something tells me UPS is going to install the same MDHOS systems that Bank of America put into their ATMs..

    Want to know why people are building MDHOS systems? It's real simple. Sit a room full of college kids down and play them a videotape of someone playing "Air Sea Battle" for the Atari 2600.* Then, ask them to spec out a system they would need to replicate the game. You will be absolutely fucking horrified.

    See, thats how it is nowadays. The industry is filled with "Generation D" (D="duh") twinks who think they would need a goddamn Athlon XP and half a gig of RAM to replicate Air Sea Battle. It's a goddamn 4-bit machine with a 2KB cartridge, guys. You dont need an MDHOS to play Air Sea Battle.

    * = Coolest 2600 cartridge EVER. Turn your subwoofer up and go nuts on the game select switch. :)

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Aaaaand...how is this better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree that the unit has "extra horsepower", but disagree with the claim that it isn't needed.

      The GPS in the unit will most likely be used to record lat/long coords of packages, which will be matched up to an address. This will allow the company to correct for inconsitiencies in publicly available mapping data used in internal route designation programs.

      The current UPS DIAD has been in use since the early 90's, and was a breakthrough and a first for the company. During the use of them for 10+ years, ideas come out, and internal procedures change to better use the tools available. The biggest reason it has so much horsepower is so that it will be doing alot of processing with adress and package data. It's alot bigger than you think.

      It should also be noted that with as many trucks and units the company has, a savings of a few seconds per driver per day over the course of a year adds up.

    2. Re:Aaaaand...how is this better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe it's because the 128mb of RAM and color screen are more widely available, or cost less due to some unpredictable cost that people other than UPS don't know about.

      don't assume that just because they have crazy features doesn't mean it wasn't cheaper to do it that way. it's called engineering. just because something looks extravagant doesn't mean that it was *really* expensive, in the big scheme.

      and if you think that UPS hasn't done more UI testing with those things than the companies that design ATM machines, you're surely mistaken.

      by the way, did you get your money from that ATM ?
      if you did, your point is moot.

  55. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any comment with "Microsoft" in it is by definition a troll on Slashdot. (That includes this one.)