Slashdot Mirror


Ten Years of Web Browsing

AnamanFan writes "Today in 1993, a group of students at the University of Illinois released a little program called Mosaic. News.com.com.com has a special four-part series on the anniversary. I for one will celebrate by spending extra time with Mozilla and Camino." Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.

66 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Web browsing? So what! by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who cares when web browsing started.

    The more important question is when did the first porn site start?

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    1. Re:Web browsing? So what! by cyrax777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      or when was the first person spammed?

    2. Re:Web browsing? So what! by meloneg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or when was the first person spammed?
      Um, it's rather well known when SPAM started.

    3. Re:Web browsing? So what! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      The more important question is when did the first porn site start?

      Come back tomorrow, when we'll be celebrating the 10-year anniversary of THAT.

    4. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Glytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know, but I do remember how pissed off myself and a few friends were in junior high when we spent an hour downloading a jpeg off of Playboy, and found out that Mosaic didn't have jpeg support after the download was finished.

      My god, I feel old now.

  2. Re:Really? by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who would have guessed that so much would change in a decade?

    No kidding, I just saw a blink tag yesterday...

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  3. if only they had known... by Ratphace · · Score: 5, Funny


    what a bloated piece of crap webpages would have become, they might have abandoned the idea... :)

    1. Re:if only they had known... by strateego · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where people with no knowledge on a subject can come, post, and pretent they know more than everybody else. (SLASHDOT.ORG)

  4. Reminisce by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ahhh, I remember it like it was, well, 10 years ago. World Wide Web? Right, It'll never catch on. We've already got gopher and ftp, what else do you need?

    Oh, how little I knew.

    1. Re:Reminisce by rsheridan6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I recall getting on yahoo, surfing all the interesting links in one night, getting bored and going back to usenet news.

      Yeah, this web thing is a nice idea, but it'll never go anywhere without any content.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    2. Re:Reminisce by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now it just has a different feel to it.
      I know exactly what you mean. I only "surfed" for the first time in 1996, but the Web definitely felt less commercial, and more homely. Back then most of the web sites had a home-made quality to them, and viewing the HTML source showed an awful lot was written by hand (as opposed to web-authoring software, Flash or CGI).

      You had the big name commercial sites back then of course (e.g. Microsoft), but even sites like Yahoo! felt like they were made by a bunch of fanatical semi-professionals, as opposed to some big corporation with big buildings and big salaries.

      People used phrases like "home page", "surf the net" and "send me e-mail", and they all take me back to a time when the Web was more innocent, before every company, shop, charity or celebrity had their own "web-presence". The Web felt less tainted by greed. Now the feeling I get from the Web is a lot more like that I get in a shopping mall, where I'm constantly having to question people's motives and the veracity of information I'm getting. In '96 you knew with 95% certainty that the Michael Jackson fansite you were checking out was put together by a dedicated fan with all the pedantry and attention-to-detail that goes with it, so you tended to trust what you were reading a bit more.

      Ok, I'm not saying that the Web was good then, and it's nothing but evil now. I'm not saying that the fantastic, informative, enjoyable, insightful sites are not there - just that they're a bit harder to find. I'm not saying that the Web is no longer a tool for free-speech and free-thinking, because as long as the standards that define the Web remain public, open and [relatively] anonymous we will still have this amazing playground for the groupmind.

      Right, I'd better go, my pizza's rapidly cooling. :-)
    3. Re:Reminisce by dr_canak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Back in 94, I had heard about Mosaic and Netscape, but had no idea what they were or what they did, let alone what the World Wide Web was. I had just scratched the surface of Gopher, but that was the extent of my online experience.

      Anyway, had just gotten a job as a sys admin for a small academic department and got a binary of netscape to run on our sun sparc classic. Like everyone else, I thought it was remarkably cool, but there was so little content i never really understood its utility. Long story short... One thing that was cool was something called "Edgar" (i think), that had real time stock quotes on it. When i showed it to our department chair, he could not get past the fact it was free, and insisted that I immediately shut the server down for fear that our department would get billed for the information that was appearing across the screen.

  5. I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 5, Funny


    Excuse me, I have to go outside and stretch my legs. A bathroom break would be a nice change of pace too.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
    1. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? Excuse me, I have to go outside and stretch my legs. A bathroom break would be a nice change of pace too. "

      What's it like serving aboard the Enterprise?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  6. Huh? by delta407 · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.
    So why post it again?!?

    Is Slashdot trying to get an obscene number of duplicates today?
  7. Deliberate Dupe by MoZ-RedShirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.

    Great. They know they are posting dupes and they even brag about it ;-)

    RedShirt

    --
    Microsft spel chekar vor sail, worgs grate !!!
  8. Uhh... by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...but mosaic wasn't the first web browser, just the first that most people used. Tim Berners-Lee wrote a graphical browser for NeXT -- his preferred platform at the time and the GUI platform he was most familiar with. For the Unixes there were only lame command-line/text-mode browsers at the time, but even those count as browsers that predate Mosaic.

    1. Re:Uhh... by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, for the Unixes there was NCSA Mosaic. Well, if you had Sun hardware, that is.

      I remember the day I first got a web browser working properly on my old Sparc box (moon.earthlink.net, incidentally EarthLinks' first DNS server...) I thought to myself: This is going to be huge if it ever gets to PC's.

      A few weeks later, someone got NCSA Mosaic working under Windows (forget who it was), and the rest is history...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Uhh... by drgroove · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tim's web browser was called "WorldWideWeb" ...
      W3.org

    3. Re:Uhh... by #!/bin/allen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The systems programmers with Unix workstations didn't have Windows and Word, so we used xmosaic as a page layout system. At that time, we were also able to delete most Word and all Excel file sent via email. If we did need to read a Word file, we used the Unix Word viewer, "strings".

      Before we were directly connected to the DDN, one of the guys wrote a telnet tunneler to get through the gatehost. That was a great day. We didn't care what we looked at. It was soooo cool.

      --
      sed 's/commun/terror/g' mccarthy > bush; sed 's/terror/saddam/g' bush > bush_wacked
  9. We should celebrate by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    We should celebrate this taking the original source code from Mosaic and updating it to include these new useful features:

    Pop up ads
    ActiveX controls that can have full access to your computer
    An e-mail client with HTML support so you can view spam as it was intended

    and so on. Go progress!

    1. Re:We should celebrate by jesser · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft beat you to it. From IE 6's about box:

      "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign."

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  10. Re:Where was my post? by CodeHog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah, here it is.. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/oped/ch i-0304180093apr18,1,4617305.story by Dan Reed

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  11. Lucky by mrphish697 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Computer Science seems to be the only profession in which we still have access to the people that helped start it. I've always enjoyed that. Take Whitfield Diffie, for example.

    --
    You can't ride two horses with one ass
  12. timeline by ih8apple · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a history provided by w3. (Note: mozilla alpha released in February 1993. Already 50 HTTP servers in existence.)

    Here's a really cool seminar given at CERN in Feb 1993 on the potential of the web browser.

  13. Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IMHO, in 10 years we've progressed in the negative direction in regards to online applications thanks to Mosiac/http/html. 10 years later we're stuck with ecommerce pages that get hopelessly confused if you press the back button. Annoying website timeouts. Complex logic on the backend to handle stateless connections. Ugly front end development models. Half/assed Java Applets/Javascript attempts to actually create decent applications.

    Now as a presentation model, the web is great. But as an application infrastructure, we've gone nowhere if not backwards.

    1. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by rgmoore · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But as an application infrastructure, we've gone nowhere if not backwards.

      No, we haven't, because there really wasn't any infrastructure for on-line applications before the web. Sure there were a handful of standard protocols like ftp and telnet, plus the ability to have remote X sessions, but there wasn't really anything beyond that. At least today it's possible to have an on-line application that has some prayer of working. The web is piss poor compared to what you could do with a really well designed on-line applications protocol, but it's a fair sight better than having to roll your own system any time you want to accomplish anything.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    2. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by archen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't say it's the fault of Mozaic/http/html. It's the lowest common denominator. In fact i'd say we've advanced due to the fact that browsers can handle more on the client side than they ever have. Stateless connections are not something that should be used for web apps, but it works (in a half asses way). That doesn't mean you should blame a pliers because it does a crap job of hammering in a nail.

    3. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by jlusk4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure where you're going with this.

      Client-server was most definitely a going concern before Mosaic, as was Sun's RPC and XDR protocols (if I may use such a grandiose word for such simple concepts).

      Even today, decent client-server apps are pretty much forced to have their own "custom" state machines/diagrams because otherwise, we'd all be running the same app (and it would be, uh... a web browser!).

      (What I mean, specifically, is that a hospital utilization management system would have a very different workflow from a textile mill spare-parts system, for instance, and that workflow/peer dialog state machine would be embodied in the application itself.)

      A co-worker tells me that maybe you're referring to the ease w/which apps could be developed post-Mosaic vs. pre-Mosaic, since tools like Visual Dev Studio ++ Wizzy Wizard# were just a gleam in somebody's eye at the time, and anyway, were absolutely not oriented to distributed processing.

      If we haven't taken a giant step backwards in developing distributed apps, we've certainly experienced some arrested development.

      John.

  14. Mosaic in the context of the time by JoeBuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had actually used the CERN line-mode www interface before Mosaic came out, just to check out the ravings of this pompous Brit I heard about (by the name of Tim Berners-Lee) who was raving that this thing called the World Wide Web was intended to contain the sum of all human knowlege. But Mosaic was a huge leap forward.

    However, when Mosaic first came out, a lot of folks in my department were using it as a better interface to Gopher, since in 1993 there was far more interesting stuff available via Gopher than via HTTP. Of course that didn't last long.

  15. I remember reading about it in Infoweek... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I can remember reading an article about Mosiac in Infoweek around then. The article gushed over it. Saying how the combination of text and pictures would revolutionize the Internet.

    I still remember thinking what's the big deal. Revolution, Shemzolution. This thing will never take off.

  16. Our Pleasure! by LordYUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Neophytus,

    On behalf of the Netscape Development Team, I just want to say, you're welcome!

    Happy Hunting!

    The Netscape Development Team.

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  17. End of the net? by neurostar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I recall getting on yahoo, surfing all the interesting links in one night, getting bored and going back to usenet news.

    So... what you're saying is you reached the end of the internet?

  18. You're in good company by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still remember thinking what's the big deal. Revolution, Shemzolution. This thing will never take off.

    Don't feel bad. Bill Gates said the same thing and according to Peter Jennings (and any other talking head that gets a chance to interview him), Gates is one of the smartest men in the world. I mean, he's got all that money, right? Surely he deserves it all for his visionary thinking. If a super-genius could make a mistake, then you shouldn't be so hard on yourself for making the same mistake.

    I remember hearing one interviewer on a radio talk show ask Gates: "Mr Gates, everyone is wondering: how did you write the Internet?" and good ol' Billy didn't bother to correct the man but gave some vague answer about how the Internet would make information available to everyone (provided they purchase a valid copy of Windows, of course).

    GMD

    1. Re:You're in good company by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gates has always said that (paraphrased) Microsoft makes mistakes all the time, and that just one particularly bad misstep could doom Microsoft's prospects. The key to survival is to outlive the mistakes, to make fewer mistakes than the competition, and to keep tons of money in the bank instead paying them out in dividends, but these things can't always be done. This is why his company has tried to lowbal investor expectations every quarter, and exceed those expectations every quarter.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  19. I really miss gopher... by WetCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    and I really miss Internet Policy, which have had banned commercial stuff from the Internet.

  20. Another Timeline by tiltowait · · Score: 4, Informative

    here. And yes, starting with Sputnik really does make sense, that little tin ball spurned more scientific research (and translation Russian services) that some people realize.

  21. Whoa.. 10 years! by matttastic · · Score: 2, Funny

    10 years ago i was playing in my backgarden eating mud. And the interweb was happening without me! :(

  22. Browser competition by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, Apple users still have it, IE vs Safari vs Camino. And as a result, browsers are fast, have popup blockers, download managers and tabbed browsing and about anything users ask for. Anyone who thinks they might sell stuff to Mac users designs their website properly. Just think about how much more lean and stable windows browsers would be if MS didn't kill off serious competition. Typing this in Safari.

  23. Re:Really? by Fulkkari · · Score: 2, Funny

    No kidding, I just saw a blink tag yesterday...

    Did it say "coming soon"?

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
  24. The speed of information by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This makes me amazed at the speed with which information now travels. I remember trying to get on the net in high school back in 94. Nobody I knew, knew anything about it and there were no easy to install IP stacks for Win 3.1. I remember trying to decipher the articles in Boardwatch magazine and hunting the local BBS's for info.

    It took me forever to finally get on (a Prodigy account) and then that was text. I used that to get info for my first Linux install and finally after switching to Netcom and getting X working, I was surfing the web with Netscape. What a pain.

    I had no idea how to do this stuff and finding the info was extremely painful. It was like a bunch of secrets that took forever to find. The only person I talked to at the time that knew about Mosaic or anything was some random clerk in an OfficeDepot.

    Today, we know the instant anything is released, we get the inner workings of expert groups. I know I take all this stuff for granted today, but it is still completely amazing how things have changed.

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    1. Re:The speed of information by Cyno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me too.

      I was just thinking the other day where would we be without the net. Right now I have access to answers to almost any questions on google, which is always available when I'm at work or home or over at a friend's house. Everyone I know has an email address or IM or some account somewhere on the net.

      Soon I will use the net for all communications, including audio, video and text. It has become as essential to everyone's every day lives as the telephone or TV. Which is very similar to AOLTW's and most corporation's mission statement, replacing internet with the company name of your choice.

      But no matter how much has been changed because of the net we can never forget that those changes happened because of open communication, open protocols, free intellectual property, free access, and the hard work of many many extremely skilled engineers. I don't think the internet could be rebuilt today in the US under our current administration or their preference for security over freedom.

      The internet is based entirely on freedom and could not exist without everyone agreeing to maintain that freedom. The freedom to send a packet around the world for $0.00. The freedom to say what you want without fear of prosecution, etc. Those freedoms might not exist forever. And then what will become of the internet as we know it or as it could be used tomorrow?

      American Capitalist Perspective: The net was only useful for commercialism. But then all those dotcoms crashed. So does that mean the net is worthless?

      MPAA/RIAA Rep: No, the net is a tool for terrorists and pirates to steal your IP and must be monitorred, enforced and secured. It is a dangerous place.

      Tech: The net can be used for voting and education and automation and software development and music and video and games and... if we just got rid of money we have the technology to make it all work for us, instead of the other way around.. Hello.. anybody listening?

  25. The web is great and all, but... by Iscariot_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The web is great, but I think lately there's been a real focus on making the web do things it shouldn't. And by that, I mean web-based applications.

    There are certain things the web can do well application wise. Like an online calendar, or email application (yahoo/hotmail). However, things like office applications should not use web-based technologies. It's always slow and clunky. I mean, sure you can do drag-and-drop with dhtml, but it's inconsistant and slow. I'd much rather deal with a java applet, or ActiveX, so as to have a true GUI instead of a GUI-emulator.

    Am I totally off base here, or does anyone else agree?

    1. Re:The web is great and all, but... by sahala · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are certain things the web can do well application wise. Like an online calendar, or email application (yahoo/hotmail). However, things like office applications should not use web-based technologies. It's always slow and clunky. I mean, sure you can do drag-and-drop with dhtml, but it's inconsistant and slow. I'd much rather deal with a java applet, or ActiveX, so as to have a true GUI instead of a GUI-emulator.

      Am I totally off base here, or does anyone else agree?

      Flash.

    2. Re:The web is great and all, but... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The biggest problem is that the closer and closer the web gets to the traditional client UI, the farther and farther it gets away from true platform independence. I could show you 500 implementation items using DHTML/Javascript that work in IE and not Netscape or Mozilla based browsers (not that a little extra work for the developers could hammer out a solution that would work on both.)

      This is a bigger problem in Intranets where the chosen browser is IE, and we do not even bother to test against anything else because of a install base of IE on 99.9% of our desktops....Or take the extra time to make it work on both.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  26. Remembering the browser wars by ericsink · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With the 10th anniversary of Mosaic I decided to writeup some of my recollections from the days when I was a participant in the browser wars:

    http://software.ericsink.com/Browser_Wars.html

    --
    Eric Sink
    Software Craftsman
  27. I'll see your news.com.com.com ... by Malfourmed · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and raise you news.com.com.com.com.

  28. If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by greysky · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Then why is it that most of the web development job postings I've seen for the last couple of years say "minimum 10 years of HTML/DHTML programing experience required"?

  29. in related news.. by verch · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..most of us had our last productive day on April 21st 1993. :)

  30. Re:Isn't lynx older? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 2, Informative

    No.

    Lynx is not 'older'

    But Gopher did predate the WWW, and provided a text-centric view into the vast emptyness that was the internet.

    --
    "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
  31. Collage - Mosaic had a companion by jdoeii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember that ftp site with Mosaic back in 1993. There was another application there - Collage. The idea was pretty neat. It was a tool to *sensualize* scientific data. Not just visualize, but turn in into audio too. I wonder what happened to it. I am not sure if it later became Spyglass Transform. It could be that its development was discontinued. Does anyone know Collage fate?

    1. Re:Collage - Mosaic had a companion by deanj · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was ended shortly before Mosaic was cancelled.

  32. Silly Campus Tech dept. by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was a Sophmore at American University in DC when Mosaic was announced. I remember going to the main computer center on campus and inquiring about this 'web browser' program and if they'd let me load it on a machine there, since the 386sx in my dorm wasn't going to cut it (or, failing that, if they'd load it themselves). Having been shuffled from person to person, I finally ended up with the lab manager who stated "Why would you want to do that? You can get everything you would want off of UseNet. We can't have students loading every flash-in-the-pan technology on these machines."

    Fine, he was rather right - there wasn't going to be much to do with Mosaic and I *did* get most things from usenet. But I would just love to go back and ask him today if he still considers web browsers a 'flash-in-the-pan'.

    -Mark

  33. Gopher's cousin protocol: Beaver by Pyrosophy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet protocols that never made it:

    Like the GOPHER protocol, used in text-based information outlines, the BEAVER protocol was the first porn-only protocol available on the world-wide-web. BEAVER://hotladies.com certainly had great promise and wide usership in its early days, but the advent of MOSAIC and all things HTTP soon spelled the end of one of the more outrageous experiments in Internet history. Now it joins the long list of Archie, Veronica, and WAIS as the burned out Stuckey's stand on the information super-highway

    Notable features were the massive amount of stripped bits in beaver packets, thrust-technology (the precursor of push-technology), ActiveXXX support, and of course evil bit technology which was 10 years (!) ahead of its time.

    beaver://slashdot.com -- we never knew ya...

  34. Most antique system used for browsing the web? by GridPoint · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A while ago slashdot posted a story about an Internet-enabled operating system with a web browser for the Commodore 64. It was claimed that the 21 years old C64 was the oldest system ever to run a (real) web browser, and a few days later this was changed to the 23 years old Atari 800 (see the web browser's homepage for the full story). This means that the web is almost 10 years younger than the oldest system to surf it!

  35. Mod parent down by WD · · Score: 3, Informative

    How is a question and an incorrect assumption moderated as "insightful" ?

    Mosaic could browse the web before Lynx could. The existing program Lynx was WWW-enabled after Mosaic was released. Just because it's text-only doesn't mean that it's older!!

  36. Not the first and Not the Best either by pjones · · Score: 3, Informative
    As I wrote in LocalTechWire. Mosaic was not the first and not the best browser.

    Web Turns 10 - But Was Mosaic Really First and Best Browser? No, No.
    By Paul Jones, Special To LTW
    Editor's note: April 22, 1993, is widely regarded as the day on which a number of people, including Marc Andreessen, who went on to help found Netscape, produced Mosaic - the ground-breaking Web browser. But was it really the first? To mark the 10th anniversary, Local Tech Wire asked one of the pioneers in Internet development - Paul Jones - to talk about the rise of the browser and how the technology transformed the Internet. Jones, who is director of ibiblio.org, a project that includes the Site Formerly Known as MetaLab and SunSITE, The Public's Library, has some very interesting observations.

    CHAPEL HILL - I don't mean to spoil the party, but the geek in me is forcing me to tell the cold unsociable truth - Mosaic, the browser that taught us the World Wide Web, is neither the first web browser nor is it the best. To make matters even more, well uncomfortable, I believe that Mosaic was a serious step in the wrong direction.

    The web seems wild and wide open now, but yes it was once designed to be more so. Believe it or not - the Web was designed for connectivity for all users, not just for publishers or information providers and it allowed the person browsing to create pages and links quickly and easily. The first web browser was about sociability and the interchange of ideas, not just delivery of linked pages.

    The real "Tucker" of Web browsers was the browser developed at CERN -where the web itself was developed - for the NeXT computer. The CERN
    Browser allowed not only web page browsing, but also WYSIWYG page creation and the ability to create links by simply highlighting text on a browsed page and linking that text to a page under construction by an easy click.

    The Hypermedia Browser also called Nexus and for a while called
    WorldWideWeb was written by none other than Tim Berners-Lee in 1990 and released in Christmas of that year. The focus of Tim's Browser was collaboration and mutual linking as reflected by the ease with which pages could be produced and links made between pages.

    I created my own first web page with only a few seconds instruction from Tim and a look at his demo age (a copy of which can be found at www.ibiblio.org/pjones/old.page.html ).

    For Tim's own description of the first Browser as well as screen shots of the browser in action see www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/WorldWideWeb.html

    More participation

    Notice that the Web in Tim's vision, as seen in his browser, was to be about active participation and creation of shared linked pages.

    Mosaic did have its moment of promoting collaboration. In Mosaic 1.2, the Group Annotations feature allowed readers of pages to add notes to those pages. This innovation was a precursor to the message boards, discussion groups and blogs of today. The nice thing about Group Annotations was the ease in which you could make notes for other group members. Even better Annotations in Mosaic supported both text and audio comments.

    Although Annotations would eventually collapse due to their
    over-popularity (and unscalable protocol design), the feature did manage to keep part of the dream of a sociable Web alive. But with the release of Mosaic 2.0 in September 1993, the folks at NCSA's System development Group decided to kill Group Annotations "initially" which turned out to be forever. (See
    target="_blank">archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/So ftware /Mosaic/Docs/group-annotations.html for NCSA's description of Annotations and their brief tale of their depreciation.)

    'A nice piece of work ...'

    The Mosaic that finally appeared in September 1993 was a nice piece of work. Mostly

    --
    Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  37. evolution of a shell script by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Funny

    less ~/scripts/browser-is-hanging.sh

    #!/bin/bash

    # killall -9 mosaic-bin
    # killall -9 netscape-bin
    # killall -9 mozilla-bin
    # killall -9 phoenix-bin
    killall -9 thunderbird-bin

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  38. Because by Gonoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Such adverts are designed by people whose profession is wearing a suit.

    No - they are not HR droids, managers or agency clones. All of those may contain people who wear suits while they work. I am talking about people who wear suits as the major part of their jobs.

    Consider a conversation...

    What do you do?
    a. I'm an accountant. What about you?
    b. I'm a programmer. And you?
    c. I wear a suit.

    These are the people that are currently requiring 5 years experience with XP for Tier 2 support jobs....

    Come the revolution...... ;)

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  39. Re:...Or if they would have known by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

    And exactly how is that stealing?

    Spyglass bought the exclusive commercial license for Mosaic from NCSA. Money and other goods were paid to NCSA for the rights.

    Microsoft purchased a non-exclusive license from Spyglass for the technology. Again, money and other goods were exchanged.

    So... uh... where is the alleged thievery?

  40. Re:WorldWideWeb written in Obj-C on NeXT? by gunpowder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately the most important part of the source code is missing ...
    ... but here you go:
    WorldWideWeb homepage
    original WorldWideWeb docu
    WorldWideWeb source code

  41. Great Milestones in Web Surfing by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    April 22, 1994: The first successful requested web page is served.
    April 23, 1994: Irwin Spelnik attempts to read a Hello World page and receives the first 404 page not found.
    May 10, 1994: Charlie Northrup gives up on his dream to become a buddhist monk after a 4x4 spashes mud on him while he played a tamborine on a street corner, he decides to get even and files for web service patents.
    June 7, 1995: Wanda Furdman, attempting to entice her boyfriend, Jimmy Pimpleton, into proposing, places a nude picture of herself on a webserver and emails him the URL. Rather than keep this to himself, he joins the spam craze and sends to URL to everyone he can find an email address for. His plan flops as he hasn't figured a way to collect money for this, however he is widely credited with establishing the business model of the .com era to come.
    December 24, 1997: Melvin Gormly acts out an episode of Star Trek with figurines and his own voice, capturing it and converting it to an AVI file. He places it on his school web server and is promptly served the first Cease and Desist letter over web content and copyrighted material.
    April 1, 1998: CowboyNeal finally abandons his trusted TRS-80, buys a PC and joins the information age. The internet will never be the same.
    July 14, 1998: Wilbur Grimp, The CEO of Universal Business Associates, a fortune 100 company, suggests an discreet interlude with a detective posing as a 13 year old boy in an internet chat room. The pair are married on San Francisco 6 months later.
    November 7, 1998: Hershel Plotz ignores requests to pay for an item he has won on eBay and receives the first negative feedback. Two days later Hershel is bitten by a dog, hit by a car, falls into an open manhole and drowns. The first troll on Slashdot finds him guilty of being in league with Microsoft and deserving of his fate.
    November 11, 1998: The first troll on slashdot accuses a bitten, battered and drowned former Sun Java Developer and good friend of Scott McNeally, of being in league with Microsoft. Months later a stack of papers will be found in a brown paper bag in a Kent, WA bus depot locker connecting Hershel Plotz and William Gates III in a bogus jcode ring. The troll is vindicated, but the victory goes un-noticed in the torrent of me-too-trolls who followed.
    February 21, 1999: Freida Morganblat writes the first Internet Search Engine in VB.net Tragically, the first VB.net compiler and Microsofts CLR won't be created unil years later and she instead turns to a career as a stockbroker, makes millions and squirrels most of it away before the .com bust, but she will never be happy again, on her private island in the South Pacific.
    October 31, 1999: CNN's main page is hacked, the days top news is replaced with preposerous headlines and idiotic stories. No one notices for hours, then stock closes up 3 points.
    January 1, 1900: The first automobile plant opens in Vetchburg, ND. It closes three days later because of a horrific glitch in computer software.
    January 3, 2000: First webcast of manufactured Hollywood brain-softening music. Rupert Windelpoons digitizes it and captures it to an array of hard disks. Initially pleased with capturing music, Rupert realizes its all tripe and reformats the drives, narrowly avoiding a not-social call from Hilary Rosen and Jack Valenti.
    August 17, 2000: Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda shyly and quivering with nervous energy, attempts to email Lara Croft, asking for a date. After days of silence he decides it was never to be, he turns with tearful eyes to a girl named Kathleen for consolation and the rest, as they say, is history.
    March 24, 2001: A mothballed server is powered up and the sendmail daemon forwards a queued message from the french president to president@whitehouse.gov, what was meant as a personal jest between Francois Mitterand and Bill Clinton will eventually result in strained feelings between the US and France.
    September 12, 2001: Virgil Nordling abandons his plan for a bloo

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  42. Remember Trumpet TCP/IP? by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a while we were installing Trumpet on every machine in the office, except for the silly MacTCP installs. Actually, Trumpet seemed to work better than MS's own Winsock 1.0 implementation. The trace window was wonderful for protocol programming.

  43. My memories of early Mosaic and the Web by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a student at UIUC at the time when Mosaic was developed, and I remember using it in the Sun and HP EWS labs. (Mosaic was installed and maintaned by students, in the lab-wide /scratch directory, for a while). I started using it right before the invention of the "IMG" tag. When it came along, that was a big deal. The NCSA "What's New on the web" page was updated with a few new web pages each day. And that was almost a comprehensive list!

    In any case, the bigger deal for me was when the EWS lab manager (Ed Kubaitis, I think) installed httpd and students were allowed to created their own web pages and serve them worldwide via www.ews.uiuc.edu/~username/ urls. I realized that EVERYONE could be a content provider, not just a select few (as was the gopher model), and this was going to be unstoppable. I even HTML-ized the existing PovRay faq, put it on my student account, sent mail out to the PovRay mailing list, and had hits within a few minutes. That was a rush, too.

    To encourage people to provide content (and get linked) I created the "UIUC People" page, which started as a list to every student homepage I knew about at UIUC. It had four entries. That quickly changed, as you can imagine.

    I don't know who decided to add the "~username" syntax to httpd, allowing mere users to add content to the global web (was it a part of CERN, or did McCool add that to NCSA?) but I'm convinced that was a key factor in getting the early web going. It's certainly what got me interested.

  44. You all forgot SLAC. by Axe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First webs server and browser in USA was developed at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center - 2 years before Mosaic and with most of its features in. One of the guys who did it As far as I know he got noting out of it..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  45. In fact.. by Axe · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..the reason that HTML was such a piece of crap is that early folks (like them here at US in 1991 where pretty damn sure that everything will be TeX. It was designed for physics experiment collaborations to use. Everything else was not anticipated..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>