Slashdot Mirror


PS2 Class Action Lawsuit Against DVD Player

Thanks to an anonymous reader for pointing us to this class action lawsuit against Sony regarding the Playstation 2's DVD player. You can fill in a form on the page to be informed of 'material developments' and assist the case, which alleges that the PS2's "..DVD player component suffers from a number of defects that prevents it from playing a wide-variety of DVD movies." Unfortunately, it seems the lawyers forgot to change the page title, which still reads 'Palm M130 Class Action Home Page'. Uhm, whoops.

73 comments

  1. Gack... by FroMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sleazy lawyers.

    I wonder if lawyers get spam with "make money fast, do a class action suit against ..."

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    1. Re:Gack... by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 1

      These guys are big-time Philadelphia activist trial lawyers who never met a case they didn't like. The firm handles everything from ambulance-chasing to malpractice to suing drug manufacturers for making life-saving yet imperfect drugs like Prozac and the flue vaccine. They are also heavily involved with Democratic politics and were central to the 2000 election litigation by the Gore team.

      --

      The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
    2. Re:Gack... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Sleazy lawyers.

      I wonder if lawyers get spam with "make money fast, do a class action suit against ..."


      Sleazy Lawyers? Sleazy Sony! A class action lawsuit wouldn't be possible if people weren't irritated at being lied to.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. Other suit by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to sue Sony's Playstation 2 DVD REMOTE for not having a properly working fast forward. I've spoken to at least half a dozen other PS2 owners (with varying brands of remotes) and all of them have the same problem (if you hold fast forward it only goes for about a second and then you have to press it again).

    I really was going to rely on my PS2 as my primary DVD player, but this caused me to have to get a different one (an X-box).

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    1. Re:Other suit by Keeper · · Score: 0

      The PS2 dvd player sucks, but I've never had a problem with it not properly playing a movie.

      You should never use a DVD player in a video game console to serve the role of a real dvd player. It's a decent idea for a dvd player in your kid's bedroom, or as a device to bring with you on vacation though.

    2. Re:Other suit by aridhol · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You should never use a DVD player in a video game console to serve the role of a real dvd player.
      Why not? It's supposed to do the same thing -- play a movie.
      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    3. Re:Other suit by Beatbyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      see this is where you're wrong. never buy something expecting it to do a function properly. even if its advertised as a feature.

      sheesh. how do you people make it across the street without getting run over?

      ;-)

    4. Re:Other suit by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 1

      It's ok, you don't have to look both ways. If you get hit, you can just sue!

      --

      The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
    5. Re:Other suit by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Why not? It's supposed to do the same thing -- play a movie."

      The problem occured because Sony didn't put enough energy into developing it or testing it as a DVD Player. It's hard to justify putting that much energy into that aspect of the unit when the primary (and profitable) purpose is to play games. It was inevitable that it'd be half-assed at best.

      It's an unwritten law: the more your game console does besides play games, the less successful it will be. The Phillips CD-I pops into mind. It wanted to be a game machine and a movie player, but didn't exactly excel at either. As a game unit, it didn't have a very good controller, nor did it have the graphics hardware to do anything particularly interesting. It couldn't even scroll images without it being choppy. As a movie player, it was kind of cool because this was before DVDs. Unfortunately, the movies were roughly VHS quality and you had to swap discs, at least the audio was really good on it.

      So yes, the PS2 was supposed to 'do the same thing' as a DVD player, but they didn't focus it on that, and the consumer got burnt. Fortunately for most consumes, DVD players are cheap enough (even considered a household item) so a lot of people just didn't care.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Other suit by Keeper · · Score: 0

      Why not?

      Video quality isn't as good as dedicated device.
      Audio quality (normally) isn't as good as dedicated device.
      Controls sucks.
      Configuation options are poor.
      Menu handling is poor.
      Limited featureset.
      Etc.

      A video game console isn't a dedicated piece of AV equipement. If you arn't expecting that kind of quality, a game console's built in DVD player is probably just fine, but I sure wouldn't want it as a part of my home theater setup...

    7. Re:Other suit by jvmatthe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's an unwritten law: the more your game console does besides play games, the less successful it will be.
      So, the PS2 can be used as:
      • a console for PS2 games
      • a console for PSX games
      • a DVD player
      • a Linux terminal with an officially sanctioned Linux distribution
      • part of a movie streaming station with Qcast (or something like that)
      ...therefore it is less successful? That seems at odds with reality, if you ask me, and probably not deserving of an "Insightful" mod. Maybe "Informative" for the CD-I stuff, but certainly not for that glaringly wrong statement.

      Even if you meant it could have been more successful without any but the first ability, I still dont' believe your statement. The PS2 is the most successful console in the past several years and three years on it is still selling like hotcakes compared to the competition. None of the above secondary abilities (DVD, PSX compatibility, Linux distro) have necessarily made it sell any better (although DVD and PSX were important to me, and others) but they certainly haven't hurt it either.

    8. Re:Other suit by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "So, the PS2 can be used as: ...therefore it is less successful?"

      Apples are not the same as oranges. I'll explain why. The PS2 can be used as a console for playing PS2 and PSX games. PSX compatiblity is for gaming and as such does not contradict what I said.

      As a DVD Player, as I've already mentioned, the PS2 suffers. The time and money put into making that work would have been better spent making the system a better machine. The graphics on the PS2 looked blurry compared to the Dreamcast simply because of a little bottleneck in the system. Sony had a terrible time at launch as a result of that.

      As for the Linux Terminal or the Qcast whatchamacallit, as they are add-ons, they don't contradict my point either. You can't argue that if the PS2 came out for $500 + a hard drive and a crippled version of Linux that the system would do anything but flounder.

      "That seems at odds with reality, if you ask me, and probably not deserving of an "Insightful" mod"

      No, it's at odds with your perception of what I said. It's not 'insightful' to you because you were applying incompatible reasoning to it. Perhaps you should have asked me to clarify instead of trying to butt heads with me over it?

      "Even if you meant it could have been more successful without any but the first ability, I still dont' believe your statement."

      Depends on how you measure success. If the PS2 didn't have a DVD player capability, it would have had a miserable launch in Japan. The launch titles with the system sucked, but as a DVD player the system was pretty cheap over there. I suppose you could label that as a bending of the guideline that I mentioned. That'd be acceptable, afterall I don't live in a world of absolutes. However, the PS2 would be NOWHERE today without good game playing capabilities. Thankfully, they had the PS1 to derive all the ideas from. "Well, we don't need to update the controller or anything like that."

      "None of the above secondary abilities (DVD, PSX compatibility, Linux distro) have necessarily made it sell any better (although DVD and PSX were important to me, and others) but they certainly haven't hurt it either."

      Oh I agree, they didn't do anything to help PS2's popularity. I dobut very many PS2s were sold so somebody could throw on a crippled Linux distro on it for another $200(!). Did it hurt it? The R&D that went into those products were not successful in the same way a game would have been. If the effort were put into a decent game, Sony would have benefitted more. Depending on your perception, it could be argued that Sony was indeed hurt by the development of those products. However, I wouldn't make that claim simply because the game would have to be good in the first place. In much the same way a degree in aeronautics doesn't mean you can be a brain surgeon, it can't be expected that the companies involved in making those products could suddenly turn out the next Final Fantasy.

      I have nothing against Sony for the features you mentioned, but $300 is too much for a system. I probably would have bought one if it were released at the $200 level. Instead, I got a GameCube, and I'm quite happy with it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Other suit by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Redundant? I answered the guy's question!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  3. I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Thanks to an anonymous reader for pointing us to this class action lawsuit against Sony regarding the Playstation 2's DVD player."

    Nintendo made a pretty strong stand with the GameCube that a game machine should only be a game machine. Gotta admit, they had a point. The GameCube was $100 cheaper than the PS2 or XBOX, plus it was considerably smaller. From what I gather from this story, the DVD player on the PS2 wasn't exactly a stellar. For the cost of a DVD Player and a GameCube, you could get a Playstation 2 that wasn't exactly stellar at either. I realize that the PS2 has games people like, however at launch Dreamcast games were looking better because of a nasty little bottleneck the Playstation 2 has.

    Well I've drifted away from the point a bit. When making a game system, focus on making it play games. Not everybody is happy to spend $300 on a game system.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by dutchct · · Score: 0

      i dont think its the dvd player that makes it more... they sell it for more cause they can.

    2. Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "i dont think its the dvd player that makes it more... they sell it for more cause they can."

      I remember reading that the launch PS2s were sold at a nasty loss. They cost nearly $500 to make. Ouch.

    3. Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by DeanT · · Score: 1
      They cost nearly $500 to make. Ouch.
      Gord has an interesting take on this over at Acts of Gord

      Take it as you will.

      DeanT

    4. Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Gord has an interesting take on this over at Acts of Gord"

      Yes, I've seen that site, but I don't think he's right. I read a magazine article back when the PS2 was launched (I think it was Next Generation, but my memory's fuzzy about it...) that broke down the costs of the system. Not only did it cost just under $500 to make, but the launch titles were not selling very well in Japan. People were buying the system because it could play DVD's, and players were expensive there. Sony needed to sell 2 games per system in order to succeed financially. That wasn't happening, though, because their launch titles sucked. There was some serious concern in the industry that Sony was damaging the market, hence the reason for the article.

      Gord's site does not talk about the Japanese launch, nor does it actually provide anything but something some dude at Sony said.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:I bet Nintendo's smiling right now. by DeanT · · Score: 1
      It's not my intention to get into an argument. Nor do I wish to defend anything Gord says. You clearly care more about game consoles than I do, and as such are probably more in tune with the market than I. I only wanted to add a data point to the discussion.

      Disclaimer: I own a PS2, use it as a DVD player, and like it just fine.

      Cheers,
      DeanT

  4. Never had a problem by Zed2K · · Score: 1

    I have a dedicated dvd player, but when I tried the ps2 one I never had a problem. My dad did initially, but I bought him the dvd remote that came with updated dvd software for it. That fixed all his problems.

    1. Re:Never had a problem by gabe · · Score: 1

      funny, i was unable to watch Tron when i had my memory card (with the updated dvd player) in. i got loads of random artifacts on the screen. lots of yellow shit. when i took the memory card out, and it used the original dvd player software, the movie played just fine. stuck the card back in, and voila, the yellow shit was back. weird. that's the only movie it's done that on so far.

      --
      Gabriel Ricard
    2. Re:Never had a problem by ianjk · · Score: 1

      Between my roomie and I, we are on our 3rd PS2. The current one no longer plays dvds I am moving back to Nintendo for the next gen. of game systems for sure.

  5. Re:Don't buy it then. by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. They are advertising the product (PS2) as a fully functional DVD player, which is not. RTFA.

    IANAL, but that's at least false advertisement and they should be punished (and at least fix the defective components free-of-charge).

  6. Re:Don't buy it then. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "If you don't like a product, don't buy it. "

    Too late. My Mr. Fusion needs some servicing.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  7. Are "normal" people this technologically unsavvy? by flabbergast · · Score: 1

    I'm reading the lawsuit filed and it spends a couple pages explaining DVDs and a couple pages explaining the PS2 (!!!???)

    "26. A DVD is the same size and thickness as a CD, approximately 4.72 inches in diameter and about as thick as a penny."

    "28. Compared to a VHS (which plays on a VCR), the DVD (which plays on a DVD Player) offers consumers significant advantages as a format for playing studio released movies at home."

    "29. The video and audio quality of DVD is significantly better than VHS."

    "35. PlayStation 2 is a successor to PlayStation (PlayStation 1), an advanced computer game console. PlayStation 1 was a breakthrough in computer technology due in part to its capability to play computer games on CDs."

    etc...etc. Any lawyers in the house? Is this type of "explanation" normal in a lawsuit? Or even necessary?

  8. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "PlayStation 1 was a breakthrough in computer technology due in part to its capability to play computer games on CDs."

    It's a breakthrough to do something that had been done many times previously? The only radical thing Sony did with the PS1 was to not include a disc activity light.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  9. Remote possibility by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to sue Sony's Playstation 2 DVD REMOTE for not having a properly working fast forward.

    Um, you're supposed to sue the company, not individual products.

    1. Re:Remote possibility by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, you could sue individual products actually, but it wouldn't really be helpful here.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  10. Re:Don't buy it then. by mbogosian · · Score: 1

    More lawyer scum looking for a quick buck. If you don't like a product, don't buy it.

    If I were the plaintiffs, I'd want some serious reduction of lawyer compensation on the boiler-plate documents. There's no way a law firm should earn millions for search/replace...especially when it's not even done right.

  11. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by lightspawn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any lawyers in the house? Is this type of "explanation" normal in a lawsuit? Or even necessary?

    You know, his honor might not be a GTA fan. In fact, he may not even own a PS1, let alone a PS2.

    If you'd like a ruling based on the technological merits, you'd better let people explain them.

    Not to mention that some parents (I know this scenario is hard to imagine, but stay with me on this) may buy consoles for their kids; these people may have no idea what they do (some of them may have professional and/or personal lives) but they need to understand the issues before becoming part of this class action lawsuit.

  12. Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by jvmatthe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There have been a lot of complaints about Sony's hardware. Just read USENET newsgroups for a while to get an idea of what I'm talking about. Here's my story, although not all of it has to do with the posted class-action lawsuit.

    I stood in line on launch day, 26 October 2000, and got my PS2 at a local Best Buy. Ever since that day, it has traveled four times on trips to visit the in-laws (12 hours away, by car) and over to a friends' apartment several dozen times, always travelling in a padded case. It has always been used standing in the upright position. I have completed several PS2 games and even some PS1 games during that time. I've watched dozens of movies on it.

    I've never had a problem playing a game. Well, ok, I did once, but that turned out to be a dirty disc and once cleaned it played without problems.

    I've only had trouble with two movies that I can think of. One of them was Jurassic Park 3 and the other was The Mexican. Everything else has worked flawlessly, to my knowledge. The glitches have always been at the layer change. One or both of these might have been before I go the updated DVD drivers with my Sony-made remote control.

    Others have had trouble with PS2 consoles. Many also had trouble with PSX consoles. Back then, I suspect much of that was because the machines were put on carpet and didn't have adequate ventilation. I always put my PSX on a hard surface, like a large book or a shelf, and never had trouble with it, after four years of heavy use. I wouldn't be surprised if many of the problems with PS2 consoles you read about on USENET and so forth were from habits similar to those that caused problems with PSX machines.

    I've had good luck with my systems, using a little care. Others have had trouble. Perhaps it is Sony's problem, but I've seen more than enough games and hardware that were obviously abused to think that much of the problem could well lie with the consumers. Is there a link to data that shows that it's Sony's problem and not the consumers? Something like "here's a list of movies tried with a just-out-of-the-box PS2. See how they don't play?"

    I sure hope my luck holds.

    1. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try any DVD with a gold-colored bottom on an out-of-the-box PS2.

    2. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by jvmatthe · · Score: 1

      Which ones are these? I don't have any and I'm not sure which movies are gold-colored DVDs.

    3. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by Farscry · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't get a PS2 until the summer after launch, and mostly because I caved in for the Gran Turismo 3 package deal. I didn't have a DVD player either, so that was a bonus. First DVD I bought didn't play the whole way through. It was "Gladiator". Gets about halfway through then gets garbled, skipping scenes randomly. I basically lose about half an hour of movie there. I exchanged it, because I thought maybe the DVD was defective. Exact same problem on the new one. I take excellent care of my systems just as you do. I'm proud of the fact that my CDs and DVDs (music, movies, and games) have nearly zero scratches. Drives me nuts when I buy a used game and the backside is all scratched up. Sure, it might work, but I despise scratched up discs. (Come on people, it's not that hard to take good care of them!) I also make sure to keep my electronics all with good ventilation. I only say this to make the case that it's not my care of the system and games that caused poor playback on some DVD's; it's the system itself. I have the same problem with "The Highlander". Can't watch the last forty minutes. Needless to say, when I finally got my HDTV, I caved in and picked up a progressive scan DVD player. No more problems. I just think it's inexcusable for a company to market a system as DVD compatible, and then have trouble even making it through a very popular mainstream film.

      --
      Mmmmm.... Pigeons. Sometimes, they come with notes attached...it's like...a fortune cookie with wings.
    4. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that sounds like a legit beef with the DVD player. I've not played Gladiator on my PS2, but if I ever get the chance I'll try it.

      Incidentally, did you have the Sony-branded PS2 remote? Perhaps those updated drivers have fixed most, if not all, of the problems.

    5. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by Ese+L0C0 · · Score: 1

      I also have a PS2 and have beaten the shit out of it and NEVER had any problems playing DVDs......This sounds like a case of stupid people trying to get money......Oh look two people have complained about a problem that has a very narrow scope...better sue someone...that would solve all our problems....

      --
      jC - sweet sweet squirrel on sheet metal
    6. Re:Launch day PS2 and my old PSX by Farscry · · Score: 1

      Nah, didn't buy the remote. I should think that once you've paid the (at the time) $300 to buy the system, you shouldn't have to pay more to fix a problem that should be repaired/updated for free.

      Imagine if Sony sold a dedicated DVD player that couldn't play a major movie correctly, then stated that it was easy to fix if you bought an updated remote. ;)

      Note that I didn't get all torqued off when this happened to me; it annoyed the crap out of me, but I knew I was eventually going to get a better DVD player anyway, so I just shrugged it off as maybe a glitch in my system. The games played fine, so... eh.

      --
      Mmmmm.... Pigeons. Sometimes, they come with notes attached...it's like...a fortune cookie with wings.
  13. Re:Don't buy it then. by Roto-Rooter+Man · · Score: 2

    Sounds to me like the problem is with the DVDs not being produced to spec, rather than with the PlayStation. Sure, the PlayStation is not a good DVD player by any means, but if a DVD is manufactured out of spec just so people with 'real' DVD players can have more features, with no thought given to people playing DVDs on PCs, Macs, or game systems, well... hard to blame that on Sony. It would be like suing Mozilla for not correctly displaying a page that was made for IE only. "Hey, you said this was a web browser, but it doesn't work with every web page!"

    --

    The goatse guy for president. Win one for the gaper!
  14. Yet on XBOX... by malakai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    playing DVD movies rock. I love the zoom and pan ability as well. Maybe all DVD players have that, but it was a nice touch on the XBOX.

    I used to use my PS2 to play DVD's. I never had a 'remote' for it though, I justed used the joystick. That wasn't the greatest. But the XBOX DVD/Remote combo worked really well. It's my primary DVD player, you get the AC3 out, as well as HDTV if your TV can handle it. All that other jazz. I'm sure the offset the cost of testing and perfecting the DVD playback capability by forcing users to buy the DVD remote to playback DVD's.

    Well worth it in my opinion.

    The only issue I had with DVD's and XBOX was when playing Morrowind. I later found out the losers at Bethesda used the "Dirty Disc" error as their catch-all exception handler. So whenever you saw "Dirty Disc" you essentially had an uncaught exception coming from the software. Pathetic.

    -Malakai

    1. Re:Yet on XBOX... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > used to use my PS2 to play DVD's. But the XBOX DVD/Remote combo worked really well. It's my primary DVD player, you get the AC3 out,

      You *do* know that the PS2 has an optical out, right? Sure it doesn't decode Dolby Digital and/or DTS, but it will put out an AC3 digital signal that your receiver will decode.

    2. Re:Yet on XBOX... by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      *Everyone* uses the dirty disc as a general error. I suspect it's the only media-related error the Xbox can throw.

    3. Re:Yet on XBOX... by PerlGuru · · Score: 1

      It's my primary DVD player, you get the AC3 out, as well as HDTV if your TV can handle it.


      Actually, you don't get HDTV, the DVD playback is limited to 480i, no better then, well anything that outputs 480 lines. It's not even fsking progressive 480, it's interlaced. It says so right on the back of the package.

      And, yes, I do have a Widescreen HDTV. I also happen to be using the X-box as the DVD player on it, but simply because our other DVD player doesn't have progressive scan either.
  15. Lawyers SUCK. by BigChigger · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I shouldn't have to explain it to you. BC

    1. Re:Lawyers SUCK. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Lawyers SUCK. I shouldn't have to explain it to you. "

      Lawyers couldn't get people to jump onto the class-action lawsuit bandwagon if they didn't have a point.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Lawyers SUCK. by Original+AIDS+Monkey · · Score: 0

      Uhhh.... if they said they could get me free money I wouldn't care if they had a point or not, queercakes.

      --


      =======
      P.S. Bite! You've been bitten by the Original AIDS Monkey! You have AIDS now!
    3. Re:Lawyers SUCK. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Uhhh.... if they said they could get me free money I wouldn't care if they had a point or not..."

      Yeah but judging from your recent posts it's safe to say you're not the type of person who puts a lot of thought into the decision making process.

      "...queercakes."

      Queercakes? Heh. Are you implying that I'm attractive to you? I mean I'm flattered and all, but I'll stay with my girlfriend.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Lawyers SUCK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lawyers couldn't get people to jump onto the class-action lawsuit bandwagon if they didn't dangle a fat settlement potential in front of consumers' faces.

      Let's face it...most people are greedy.

      Most class-action lawsuits are nothing more than paycheck fodder for "teams" of bottom-feeding lawyers. (Tobacco settlement anyone?)

  16. Re:Don't buy it then. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    It's the web site, not the filing. The lawyers don't create the web site, they create the filing.

  17. Re:Don't buy it then. by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 2

    I really wonder what the problem exactly is. Are the non-working DVDs out of specs, or just the PS2 cannot read prefectly in-spec DVDs?
    For what I've read, the problem is the second one(I can be wrong). In that case, Sony IS responsible for this.
    Otherwise, I guess the case would have no merit.

  18. I don't see what the big deal is by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

    I've had my PS2 for about 6 weeks now and the only problem I had with it (aside from figuring out how to turn it off the first day I got it), was the loud click and "disc error" that only lasted as long as it took me to shut it down, look at the warrantee label, and then spary some canned air into the fan port. Not a single issue with playing DVDs though, and I've done that on many occasions.

    At anyrate, aren't all the games themselves DVD discs too? I can understand people getting miffed over having to pay about half the price of a new unit in order to get something "fixed", but I still am completely baffled by this case...

    1. Re:I don't see what the big deal is by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      The suit addresses two points:

      1: The DVD Movie player isn't as compatible with DVD movies as it should be.

      Personally, I never had a problem with it, except for one disc, and even then, a lot of other players did the same thing. After installing the update, even this disc played with no problems. Yeah, the PS2 had problems with layer switches, but then again, so did a lot of players circa 2000. Again the upgrade helped a lot.

      2: The DVD mechanism itself is defective, resulting in a $120 repair charge for a $200 or $300 product.

      This DID happen to me - my first PS2 conked out after about a year of moderate use, maybe about 200 hours of games and movies. I tried the tips on the internet - canned air, lens cleaner, even opened the case, but nothing worked. The drive would need replacing and was a $100 for the part (DIY), or $120 for Sony. I just bought a new unit figuring it wasn't worth the "gamble".

  19. Only Disc problems I have ever had by szyzyg · · Score: 1

    One was playing a not entirely legal Power Puff Girls DVD - it seemed to only play the keyframes - while my Samsung POS dvd player handled it fine.

    The other problem has been several PS1 discs - Finaly Fantasy 8, Resident Evil 2 - they don't recognise the disc. Not that it matters I still have my old school playstation and it's more than capable of handling these.

    1. Re:Only Disc problems I have ever had by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

      Power Puff Girls DVD

      i'd have to think that perhaps there's other issues than the dvd that didn't quite play right.

      ok, ok, i've shamelessly ripped a few PPG DVD's to vcd for the little monsters too.

  20. Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. by JofCoRe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think I may have had the problem they are talking about... a few months back, my PS2 stopped reading any DVD movies. Just kept saying "disc read error". After running a cleaner thru it many times, and dissasembling and blowing out any dust, it still didn't work. So, I turned to the mecca of all answers: google. W/in a few minutes, I had found a solution. I don't think this is the exact same link that I found back then, but it has the same information. The portion that mattered to me was the laser voltage adjustment. A minor turn of the screw, and it's been working flawlessly ever since. (Although I was stumped for a little while until I realized I was turning the wrong screw and adjusting the CD voltage instead of DVD voltage -- doh!) Of course, doing so voids my warranty, but my PS2 was old enough by then to be out of the warranty anyway, so...

    Much easier than lawsuits...

    However, I do see the point of the lawsuit, considering that apparently Sony's position on this is that you should send or take your unit in for service, costing you around $100-$120...

    Sony should just fess up and fix them for free when people have these problems, since it seems to be a widespread enough problem and not just "isolated incidents"...

    --

    Place sig here.
    1. Re:Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      From reading usenet, Sony has supposedly started repairing the older units for free - even if out of warranty.

      Unfortunatly this was too late for me...oh well.

    2. Re:Hmmm... I just used google to fix mine. by asdkrht · · Score: 1

      Hey! Did you bother to contact Sony? They might have offered to fix it FOR YOU FOR FREE! Course now that you've opened it I doubt that they will touch it...

  21. Brotherhood of the Wolf by swat_r2 · · Score: 0

    I noticed several months back that some video stores had big signs on certain DVD's "Will NOT work on a Playstation 2", I guess a lot of customers were complaining about the compatibility issue with the stores. Not to mention buying Korn's new DVD and also realizing it didn't work. Got the remote for my Xbox though and everything was a-ok.

  22. Uk ps2 by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    I havent encountered any problems playing discs on my ps2. However the sound is AWEFULLY low (the tv has to be turned to full volume to hear the dvd at normal tv volume - and this has been tested on 2 tv's) also it sometimes plays things in the wrong aspect - Lee evans live in london plays fullscreen and looks all screwy. My downstairs tv has a widescreen button which squashes it down so it looks fine but my bedroom tv doesent :-(

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
    1. Re:Uk ps2 by JazFresh · · Score: 1

      Read the manual. The low sound is deliberate, so that if you're using DTS or Dolby 5.1 then the TV sound doesn't interfere with the 5.1 sound. To get a regular volume curve, go into the DVD player and play a movie, go into the options and turn off Optical Output.

  23. Mine's fine... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    My PS2 is the only DVD player in the house. It's never had a problem playing a disc. I have a 3rd party remote and I use DVD Region X to play non-Australian releases.

    But then, I wasn't an early adopter.

  24. Making compatible DVDs is not easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The suit claims that not all DVDs play, but there are very few DVD players out there that play 100% of DVDs, just like not all browsers display 100% of webpages, even if they are W3C compliant. Sooner or later the player/browser comes up against the limitations of its implementation (lack of memory or whatever) and faults occur.

    A DVD may look like a CD, but it's nowhere near as simple. DVDs can have variable bit-rates, rudimentary scripts for menu interaction, all sorts of stuff for subtitles, multi-angles, and so on. The software implementations differ from DVD player to DVD player, and there are always bugs.

    The difference here is that there's 40 million or so PS2s out there. It's gotta be the single most numerous model of DVD player on the planet. So any fault makes it ripe for ambulance chasers.

  25. Never had a problem reading anything with my PS2. by Juravieal · · Score: 1

    Ive had two different PS2s. I bought one about 2 years ago, used it for a couple months, then sold it when I was strapped for cash. In that time, I never had a problem playing any games, or watching any movies.

    Ive had another one for about 9 months or so. I have the sony dvd remote (dont use the updated drivers, because my model already has them built in. Most of the newer ones do, if you RTFM and check), and this is the primary DVD player of the house. I use the optical output for audio, the svideo for video, and everything sounds and looks great. There is a HUGE difference in the looks of several games (maybe movies too, havent checked) when switching from the RCA video out, to svideo.

    Anyway, in this time, Ive ran hundreds of dvds through it, and never had a problem playing a single movie. In fact, my dad has 3 different dvd players, 2 cheapies, and a 350$ (at the time) JVC that wont play near all of his dvd's. None of them. He brings them to my house, because my ps2 plays them all. I dont see what everyone is whining about personally.

  26. Webmaster needs to be slapped by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    For Christ's Sake, change the page title! Probably got some high school kid to do the web page. Didn't know what he was doing so got another page as a template and modified it for this PS2 page and forgot to change the <title></title> information.

  27. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    If putting your games on CD isn't a breakthrough when a console does it, perhaps you could explain why the N64 did so poorly, compared to said PS1?

    Here's a hint: one of the advertising campagins for Final Fantasy VII said something like 'Somebody take those cartridge guys out back and given them a cigarette.'

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  28. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "If putting your games on CD isn't a breakthrough when a console does it, perhaps you could explain why the N64 did so poorly, compared to said PS1?"

    The N64 didn't do poorly. It did quite well. Being beat by PS1 isn't the same as doing poorly.

    As for the PS1, I'll happily concede that it's CD-ROM choice did help in it's success. However, I doubt we'll agree on the reasoning. The PS1 had a shitload of games. (Mostly shit games, so it really was a shitlaod) The cost of entering the PS1 game world was very very low in comparison to the N64. The N64's choice of cartridges made publishing games very expensive and risky. It had fewer games and fewer people interested in it. Despite that, though, it's not clear that Nintendo's most successful games would have been any better with CD. Cheaper, definitely, but better in terms of game play? Doubtful. "Now loading..."

    That's all completely off-topic, though. The PS1 was NOT the first, by far, to use CD's as a medium for games. It was not a breakthrough. It was successful, but not a breakthrough.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  29. Sorry about the formatting by Farscry · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that; new user here. I didn't notice that it posted in HTML by default, hence no paragraph breaks.

    My apologies, won't happen again.

    --
    Mmmmm.... Pigeons. Sometimes, they come with notes attached...it's like...a fortune cookie with wings.
  30. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    For further education, find the book "Game Over: Press Start To Continue."

    To make a game for the Nintendo/Super Nintendo, and to a lesser extent the N64, you had to buy a batch of carts from Nintendo. Therefore, if you overestimated your sales, you were stuck with carts; underestimate, and you had to wait several months(!) for the big N to make you some more. Carts were expensive. Oh, and for the Nintendo, at least, big N limited you to five titles per year.

    Now, the PS1; cds are dirt cheap to make. Any production house can stamp out hundreds of thousands over the weekend. You didn't need to go through Sony. You could do a small run, or a big run.

    Suddenly, it's worth doing a 'niche' title. You have tons of space to play with, instant reproduction, no licensing fees, no dealing with a forced vendor, and no worrying that the price of RAM chips is going to go up, or your order won't be filled any time soon because Dragon Warrior 3 or Final Fantasy 3 is taking up the world's available cart-manufacturing capability.

    It was a breakthrough in that it was the first mainstream console to do it; on the PC, you had Myst at the time. You had the CD-I; flop. You had the SegaCD; useless. Oh, and the Saturn; fine. But the PS was originally supposed to be an add-on to the Super Nintendo; it simply got released late.

    In terms of gameplay? Hell yes. The N64 had some sweet texture processing capability; if only you could have had a CD full of textures. If only Mario 64 had more than five or six digital sound samples; Conker managed to squeeze an entire game's worth of dialog into a cart, but it was one of the last games out; took them that long to figure out how.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  31. Re:Don't buy it then. by asdkrht · · Score: 1

    Has anyone contacted Sony support and been told that they have to pay to fix their PS/2 if it doesn't play / red dual layer DVD properly?

  32. Re:Are "normal" people this technologically unsavv by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Now, the PS1; cds are dirt cheap to make. Any production house can stamp out hundreds of thousands over the weekend. You didn't need to go through Sony. You could do a small run, or a big run."

    Fair point. I think you make sense, but I'm not willing to concede for the simple reason that they're not the first to do it. PCs have an even lower barrier to entry (even in the PS1 days) and were quite successful with CD-ROM titles. Heck, people could put out games for free without any media at all, simply using BBS's and eventually the internet. That's how ID was started.

    In any case, Sony was quite successful and I respect that. I'm just not willing to throw the term 'breakthrough' at it. The technology was already proven and the business model was made viable by the rapidy dropping prices of burning CDs. See what I mean?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  33. Blame the MPAA/RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could it be that the reason that some of these DVDs are not playable is because they have strong anti-piracy encryption, and therefore don't comform to the standards?

    By this example you'd think it was okay to sue CD-player companies for their older players that do not play some moderns CDs (anti-piracy reasons). When in fact, the players work perfectly fine on CDs that comform to the standards. It's not their fault that companies are selling coasters and calling them CDs.

  34. woah, it works now... by gabe · · Score: 1

    ok, someone posted these instructions on how to fix it (http://www.geocities.com/djyayo/PS2errorFAQ.txt) and i followed those instructions to clean the lense on my ps2 (i bought it soon after they came out, so i have no warranty anyways) and it worked like a charm. all of my ps2 blue cd games that didn't work, now work again, as well as all of the dvds that didn't play before.

    huzzah!

    i kinda feel like kramer when he used that balm during his coffee lawsuit.

    --
    Gabriel Ricard