Slashdot Mirror


SETI Goes to Arecibo To Stat *Candidates*

Neuropol writes "In the most rescent Seti@home news letter. Seti recieved (only!) 24 hours of telescope time at Arecibo to investigate interesting points in the sky where signals have not only shown up once but several times in data crunches in the last 4 years. The Planetary Society web site has an excellent summary of the reobservations. The Seti web site lists the reobservation targets and the 7,000 users whose computations directly contributed to finding them."

47 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Re:24 hours? by tupshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ummmm...read the article. Three days, eight hours each. They sound very non-geeky ;-)

    -Tupshin

  2. This sucks by CptChipJew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Regardless of how you feel about Seti@Home's mission, whether or not it's worthwhile, I think 24 hours is quite a bit short.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:This sucks by Drakin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      24 hours is a bit short, yes. But I beleive getting time on the big radio telescopes is a difficult feat to start with.

      At least they were able to reschedual the 2nd and 3rd 8 hour periods, seeing solar flares washd out the original dates.

  3. Aw man by ericdano · · Score: 4, Funny

    My name is not on the list. Damn. Oh well, I hope we find something regardless.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Aw man by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Me neither....
      Lets just say that with us checking the rest we made it possible for these lucky guys to find a real hit :)

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Aw man by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My name is not on the list. Damn. Oh well, I hope we find something regardless.

      Well, as someone who *did* make it to the list...

      I feel exactly the same as you do.

      I don't care about some top-6000 candidates list (although I will admit, I did originally hope to make it to the top 1000 overall... But failed, sigh. Just couldn't compete with the likes of SGI and Pixar <G>).

      I care that maybe, just maybe, all that otherwise-wasted CPU power went toward helping us find the first real proof of intelligent life off-planet.

  4. father figure by Debian+Troll+Returns · · Score: 5, Funny

    let's just hope that if they ever find anything using SETI that it's not fucking jodie foster's dad.

    1. Re:father figure by drdink · · Score: 3, Funny

      Impressive, seeing the movie came out in 1997 and Seti@Home was released May 17, 1999. I'm sure Jodie knew that Debian would have that package 2+ years later, though...

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    2. Re:father figure by xdroop · · Score: 2, Funny
      let's just hope that if they ever find anything using SETI that it's not fucking jodie foster's dad.

      I think we all hope that what ever it is, it has better things to do than that.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
  5. Re:24 hours? by Exiler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yea, I read that right after I posted. At least I'm normal for a slashdotter. ;P

    --
    Banaaaana!
  6. i thought by Madcapjack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought that I had read a couple weeks ago that the SETI reinvestigations had turned up nothing. I think i read this on google news...

    1. Re:i thought by Troed · · Score: 4, Informative

      this article?

      Although the SETI@home team was ready to pounce on any possible extraterrestrial signal the minute it was detected, nothing resembling such a signal was detected in real time, during the observations. This, however, is no cause for discouragement: real-time analysis is very rough, and would only detect the strongest and most obvious extraterrestrial signals.

    2. Re:i thought by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Informative

      well, if it's a stupid signal, why bother... 'take me to your, er... duuhhhh'

      Seriously though, it's not as though SETI is competing with space exploration in any serious way. Since it's been privatized (and even before, actually), the yearly budget for SETI is _much_ lower than the cost of launching the cheapest satellite. Interplanetary travel is orders of magnitude more expensive.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:i thought by JonnyCalcutta · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just assumed that since every Brit get's a free trip to either Moonbase Alpha or Gallifrey every year that it happened in the USA as well. I guess that's why they told us to keep it under our hats.

    4. Re:i thought by Eminence · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is way cheaper to analyze radio data, especially in the way SETI@Home does it (using voluntary contributions of computing power and data being a side product of other observations) than to send even a single astronaut into low orbit. We should keep on sending people into space but projects like SETI@Home don't harm that effort any more than other astronomy research.

  7. First Light! ;-) by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Telescope geeks rejoice. But what should one say for a radio telescope? "First wave"?

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  8. 24h is a lot by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hey, this isnt your neigbours dish antenna, they got a whole day on the largest radio-telescope in the world. This thing has 300m diameter. Compare this to the fact that the "normal" data they use is from a insignificant, tiny telescope.

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    1. Re:24h is a lot by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Compare this to the fact that the "normal" data they use is from a insignificant, tiny telescope.

      Uhhhh no. The data they get is ALL from Arecibo, but most of the time it's just 'wherever it happens to be pointing for someone else's research'. The only difference is that for 24 hours they got to decide what it's pointed at.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  9. Re:Eh? by more+fool+you · · Score: 2, Funny
    recieved
    rescent
    reobservation

    Thank god for the "Editor" union...

  10. Re:Last 100 years has been about flight, next.. sp by pe1rxq · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm only 30, heavy smoker but I think with stem cell research I can always get a new pair of lungs long enough to see the day I can fly me to the moon.


    With an attitude like this you can better hope for stem cell research to come up with an artificial brain....

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  11. Re:exactly what i was wondering by Jarnis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Earth turns, does it not? Basically the huge dish sees what's right above it at any given time. 24h time allocation lets the reobservers see the whole sky. They just 'listen in carefully' at each reobservation point as the sky turns.

    They can also (I assume) do limited 'pointing' by turning the reception gear that is hanging at the center of the huge dish.

  12. Whew by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank god they did not have more telescope time or they might have found my secret super villian orbital base where I am currently using the weightless environment to concoct a series of deadly patents which will allow me to take over the world.
    (insert evil laugh here)

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Whew by comet_11 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, I've already thought of and patented the process of hatching an evil scheme.

      --
      By reading this comment, you immediately waive any and all rights regarding it.
  13. What the signal will look like? by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 5, Funny
    It'll be "intelligent noise". Any civilization capabable of sending radio signals will be poluting the universe with signals from various sources, just like we've done for the past 80 years.

    Perhaps if we're lucky, we'll receive the first episode of their SCI-FI series - "Pale Men From Earth!"

    1. Re:What the signal will look like? by khakipuce · · Score: 2, Informative
      "just like we've done for the past 80 years"

      But not for much longer and definietly not on the frequencies Seti is searching. I give our current single carrier based broadcast signals another 70 years before they are completely replaced by cable, line of sight, spread specturm, laser or whatever. Any of which will substantially reduce power and/or off-planet radiation.

      SETI doesn't search the easy to use frequecies used by broadcast media because they would be swamped by terestrial signals. But they argue that some benevolent advaned race (the Vulcans I guess) will be broadcasting in some strange area of the microwave spectrum because it has something to do with water (you're gonna have fun with that aren't you).

      So put all that together and plug it into the famous equation and I get a probablility of $lt;1 that we will find ET. 150 years of braodcast in a >10 billion year old universe!

      But for all we know the signals from aliens could be encoded in the DNA of space fairing viruses. Aliens who "see" with radio could be happily spewing light into the galaxy for anyone to detect. A non-water based life form may be broadcasting to us at the "sulphuring hole" frequencies.

      You've got to be pretty lucky to find an alien.

      --
      Art is the mathematics of emotion
  14. Re:Last 100 years has been about flight, next.. sp by AvantLegion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think in the next 50 years we will see space travel as common as transcontinental passenger jets are today.

    Doubtful. The thing about passenger jets is that they take you to places that you have business going to - places with stuff like oxygen.

    How long will it be before "common" space flight is even possible, let alone with destinations to go to?

    50 years is far too short.

  15. what if they missed it by MoFoYa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the 24 hrs were broken into 3 sets of 8 hrs. during the first set they reobserved 80something targets. passing over the area near each for a short time. so, ~10 targets an hr is about 6min each.

    what if the aliens took a 10 min break?

    or what if whatever organization on the alien world that signals to us was only allowed 1 day, and it was yesterday.

    a place as big as the universe could be constantly monitored for 1000's of years, and may still come up with nothing.

    1. Re:what if they missed it by Eminence · · Score: 4, Insightful
      what if the aliens took a 10 min break? etc.

      Bad luck then. This is - to some extent - a game of chance. But you have to play it to have any chance to win.

  16. Re:exactly what i was wondering by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Mostly, they just observe what happens to be above as the earth turns. They can effectively move the viewing position by two degrees either way by moging the position of the receiver across the focus, and the tilt of the earths axis "nods" the view up and down over the year, so in a year they get to see about half the total sky. Lokk at the maps on the Seti@home page to see what they can see.

    For many purposes, Arecibo is quite restrictive; for seti@home, it is excellent - unless, of course, ET lives due north or south.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  17. Only? by eericson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know 24 hours may not sound like a lot, but just consider all they other "hard" science projects out there competing for resources. Getting 3 days on one of the largest radiotelescopes in the world is actually quite an achievement. Especially if you consider than most scientists consider SETI to be a bunch of crackpots.

    -E2

    --
    The evil monkey commands you to dance.
    1. Re:Only? by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kinda unfortunate that they are thought of that way. While the odds of contact soon are low, there's nothing wrong with the science or basic assumption that there is other life out there.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  18. Re:24 hours? by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ummmm...read the article. Three days, eight hours each. They sound very non-geeky ;-)

    That's terrible!

    Don't these people realize they're looking for signals from the stars, and the stars only come out at night?!

    And even if they do find something, anything an alien civilization happens to broadcast during daylight hours is likely to be nothing more than soap operas, talk shows and infomercials.

    I insist that the scientists wait until prime-time, and equip the telescope with a cable descrambler, to catch all the good alien shows.

  19. This is old news by MoobY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reobservations have been done halfway March (which is stated on the page that is linked too), so this is not really *news*. For now, there do not seem to be any interesting results from these reobservations.

    --
    --- Sigmentation Fault - Comments Dumped
  20. Some precisions by IIEFreeMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact the re-observations happened a long time ago (in March i believe) but the scientists are preparing the data to analysed by the SETI@Home program. Apparently it is quite a hard task as they used different instruments than for their usual data.

    Last SETI Update : 21/05/2003

  21. Inclination to galactic disc... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    For many purposes, Arecibo is quite restrictive; for seti@home, it is excellent - unless, of course, ET lives due north or south.

    The Milky way is quite "flat" when you look at the whole galaxy, so if the earth is rotating in the same plane, you should be able to hear quite much. Right "up" or "down" there probably won't be as many candidates. Anyone know on what "scale" we're listening? Would that even matter, or are we trying to listen "locally", galactically speaking.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Inclination to galactic disc... by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that the Earth is tilted. Therefor, the Arecibo radio telescope doesn't point straight into the galactic disc.

      And it only looks flat when you view it from afar. Just look out at the night sky, and see how many stars are "North" of you, and how many are "South" of you. There are stars in the Southern hemisphere that can't be seen from the Northern hemisphere, and vice versa. Because of this, one could assume that since Arecibo has such a limited view of the sky, we could very well miss a star from which the telltale signals of an alien civilization would emerge.

      Worse, they don't even get the Arecibo telescope for a continuous 24 hours. Rather, they get it for 8 hours a day, making it even more limited.

    2. Re:Inclination to galactic disc... by Betelgeuse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All of this is true, but it's also beside the point. Even if the Earth wasn't tilted with respect to the plane of the solar system, we still wouldn't have to worry about the Galaxy. In fact, there is no reason to expect that the plane of the solar system would be aligned with with the plane of the Galaxy (and, in fact, is not).

      And anyway, there is plenty of sky to look at with "just" 24 hours.

      --
      I couldn't tell if you were experimenting with poor-man's cryogenics or looking for the orange sherbet.
  22. Re:24 hours? by edgrale · · Score: 2, Funny

    I insist that the scientists wait until prime-time, and equip the telescope with a cable descrambler, to catch all the good alien shows.

    Nothing like Good Alien Pron. I hope they're green =)

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  23. Dupe... :D by Seahawk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Latest research concludes that the average memory of a member of the online community "Slashdot", seems to be something less than 3 months(original story)

    That, or the internet is severely lagged at the moment(There was that IP over avian carrier thingy...)

  24. Re:Last 100 years has been about flight, next.. sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Near the middle of the last century we learned how to make rockets which took us beyond our earth for the first time."

    And in those 50 years we have just got better at making overgrown, unreliable, inefficient, at best, only partially reusable bloody FIREWORKS. Our space programs are a sick joke, flinging man and machine into the big black through brute force because we haven't thought of a better way. In 50 years we have gone virtually nowhere in terms of technological advancement: we have cleverer probes, faster rockets, bigger payloads but there is nothing fundamentally different from the V2 rocket. Before space travel can really - for what of a better term - take off we need to get a technology that doesn't rely on strapping the traveller to a giant tube containing huge quantities of volatile chemicals in big tanks and then igniting them in a combustion chamber.

  25. Patterns...... by PS-SCUD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please don't mod this a troll because It's not.

    I just find it fascinating, how the SETI project is looking for signals coming from outer space that have the tiniest pattern to them. Because, they assume, if it has a pattern, it was created by intelligent life. But back on Earth, they have been studying DNA, which has an incredible pattern. Yet they say that it doesn't have an intelligent creator.

    --


    "Much work is lost, for the lack of a little more." -Edward H. Harriman
  26. I can imagine the fun by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seti: "Hey Look - We can confirm that this is a radio signal!"

    World:(begins to panic)"Really? How far away are they? How old's the signal?"

    Seti: "Well, these signals came from that star cluster over there about 950,000 years ago."

    World:(disappointed)"Almost a million years ago - and they never invented space travel"

    World: //scraps space plans

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:I can imagine the fun by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny perhaps, but an interesting point - if we did detect something from 1M years ago, why would they have come our way in the meantime ?

      I mean, *light* has only just got here, and galactically speaking, we were pretty boring a million years ago (hell, in even inter-solar-system terms, we're pretty boring now!) I wouldn't get out of bed to travel a million light years to see if there's something here ...

      So, they may have colonised their entire sector/galaxy/galactic cluster using weirdo-science space travel; just because they didn't make it here yet, doesn't mean they didn't/couldn't...

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  27. Re:24 hours? by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Funny

    But then they'll get sued by some kind of Super alien DMCA... I wonder if their encryption is like DVD, crackable with a few lines of perl... Actually maybe they code in english, and talk in perl...they're aliens and probably sound like it anyways..

  28. /. made it by skamp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like /. is in the list, with less than a thousand units returned. Way to go!

  29. Patterns? - Read the protocols by ianscot · · Score: 4, Informative
    Because, they assume, if it has a pattern, it was created by intelligent life.

    Who assumes that? Certainly not the SETI @ Home people.

    There are quite elaborate "protocols" for weeding through the many, many signal patterns the SETI project does hear, precisely because it ain't necessarily so. That's, um, a whole lot of what the SETI project is doing, if you would care to consider what all those home boxes are up to with their spare cycles.

    The most obvious example of a naturally occurring regular pattern -- mentioned prominently in the article /. linked to -- is pulsars, which tick away regularly and give off a very distinct radio signal pattern.

    (You really want to read a criticism or two of the "watch watchmaker" thing you're arguing. Go find a critique or two of Darwin's Black Box, which is basically the same argument made on the same, sub-molecular level that you're already thinking of.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  30. Re:Water's not the only liquid in universe by tigersha · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what, may I ask are you going to do with an Alien? Screw it/her? Not bloody likely. This is not Startrek, you know, its Real Life!

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism