Slashdot Mirror


Chicken Run

Applying modern technology to the task of corraling chickens for the slaughterhouse results in a chicken-catching machine that surprisingly is not as gruesome as it appears. Never thought about a "chicken vacuum" before? After reading this, you won't be able to get it out of your head. :) Sadly, scientists are already researching ways for the chickens to fight back.

89 of 550 comments (clear)

  1. but it's more humane! by sweeney37 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some of the biggest fans are animal-rights groups, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. The machines are far more gentle on the birds than human handlers are. "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear and horror of chickens," says Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns, a Machipongo, Va., group that opposes eating chickens and also runs a sanctuary for a few lucky birds that manage to escape the farms (usually by falling off a truck).

    They do realize the bird's final destination, right?

    Mike

    1. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm all for reducing the "panic, fear, and horror" of chickens. Animals that die scared don't taste as good, because the chemical soup that gets released into the bloodstream (adrenaline and so on) gives the meat a tainted flavor. Yuck.

      Animals should die happy. They taste better that way.

    2. Re:but it's more humane! by RollingThunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      New worst job: chicken masturbator

      Makes the chickens die euphoric, for the best taste ever! Or something.

      *shudders*

    3. Re:but it's more humane! by frankthechicken · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I guess its more humane than using my Dyson. Still I would've thought that the noise coming from that contraption's eggshaust and engine would've scared them away before they had a chance to be sucked in. I mean eggsactly how bloated have these chickens been raised, so as not to run at first sight from that thing?

      Sorry.

    4. Re:but it's more humane! by flyneye · · Score: 4, Funny

      It could be worse. Boeing has a "chicken cannon" to test impact of birds on jet engines.(hahahaha I wanna be the guy runnin that one!)

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    5. Re:but it's more humane! by azav · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but it their path to their destination traumatic or humane?

      Temple Grandin did research and studies on humane cattle harvesting. As it turns out, it's not only better for the animals to die in a non stressed manner but it's better for the quality of the meat and the profits of the company.

      Very interesting story.
      http://www.grandin.com/
      Interesting read.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    6. Re:but it's more humane! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      New worst job: chicken masturbator
      Correction: Assistant chicken masturbator.
    7. Re:but it's more humane! by cheshiremackat · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do realise that all chickens are female, right? So a chicken masterbater is more like the chicken fscker/ book mobile guy from southpark... -CMK

      --
      Bad spellers of the world untie!
    8. Re:but it's more humane! by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's called Kobe beef, and damn is it tasty.

      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    9. Re:but it's more humane! by snarkh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are going to die too. Should you not be able to enjoy it meanwhile?

    10. Re:but it's more humane! by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 5, Funny

      The worst job I've ever heard of is a friend of mine who works at a pig farm. His job is to "plug in" the male pigs to the female pigs because the male pigs are too lazy to do it themselves.

      True story, not kidding. And the guy lives, curiously enough, in "Beaver, Utah". Gross job, man.

    11. Re:but it's more humane! by zcat_NZ · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    12. Re:but it's more humane! by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tyson and Pilgrim's Pride could save themselves a lot of time and trouble by switching to Chick'N. They will just need to contact New Dawn Biotech in Alberta to negotiate licensing.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    13. Re:but it's more humane! by emo+boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      They only shoot dead chickens. They previously used gelatin but it didn't model chickens properly.

    14. Re:but it's more humane! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      >> New worst job: chicken masturbator

      What do they do, choke them to death?

    15. Re:but it's more humane! by metamanda · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a friend who used to have to collect bull semen. Part of the process involves stimulating its prostate with a cattle prod. Think about that for a second. Think about where that cattle prod has to go. That's a pretty scary job.

    16. Re:but it's more humane! by dheltzel · · Score: 5, Informative
      You do realise that all chickens are female, right?

      Not the kind that you buy in the store. Laying hens are (obviously) female, but broilers (the kind you get cut up in the supermarket) are "straight run", meaning unsexed, about 50/50 sex ratio. They are killed at 8 weeks of age, before any significant hormonal effects take over.

    17. Re:but it's more humane! by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 3, Funny

      Poor chicken.

      For its suffering, it hope it will be cannonized....

      (ducks to avoid flying chicken)

    18. Re:but it's more humane! by rc5-ray · · Score: 2, Funny

      I grew up just north of Beaver, Utah. My hometown's name is "Fillmore". Look it up-it's on the interstate.

      When asked where I was from, I could calmly respond:

      "I'm from the Fillmore-Beaver area!"

    19. Re:but it's more humane! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 4, Funny

      You do realize that even people on death row have to be killed humanely, right?

      For the same reasons, actually. Stressing a person before killing them pumps them up full of hormones (adrenaline) that totally screws up the flavor. Also makes the meat pretty tough.

      Actually, I'm surprised there are this many comments and I'm the first to make a cannibalism joke.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  2. If they could ramp this up… by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    â¦to toddler size, this could revolutionize the daycare industry.

  3. Somehow ... by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    KFC will never seem the same again with Colonel Sanders driving that thing.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:Somehow ... by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      KFC? Chicken? Everyone knows the reason they changed their name from "Kentucky Fried Chicken" to "KFC" is because they no longer use chickens in their meals.

      Kentucky Fried Chicken has become KFC. Does
      anybody know why? We thought the real reason
      was because of the "FRIED" food issue. It's
      not. The reason why they call it KFC is
      because they cannot use the word chicken
      anymore. Why? KFC does not use real chickens.
      They actually use genetically manipulated
      organisms.


      C'mon... I saw it on my innernet, so it must be true!

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  4. Very nice, humane, but... by SamBC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I personally would like to see more effort and ingenuity go into finding ways to kill the birds more humanely. I for one wouldn't want to go by being dipped in electrified water *then* beheaded. Just the beheading will do me, if it has to be done.

    Don't get me wrong - I support the eating of meat, for those who choose to (like me) - I just wish we could do it in more sensible, humane ways.

    1. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by phelddagrif · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well there are many ways to slaughter animals, but not too many of them are feasible at the scale at which chickens are usually done. You can gas the animals, It's not overly painful but then you need to keep a ton of poisonous gas around, and run the risk of accidentally gassing your co-workers, not good. Furthermore, I don't know much about chemistry but I can guess that eating gassed meat isn't too good for you. You can lethally inject the birds but then you'd need more syringes than an army of heroin junkies, and the cost is insane. And who would adminster the injections? a squad of specially trained monkeys I think not. However, injections are not too painful, but at the same time they can make the mean poisonous.. You can Chop all their heads off, while they're still running around. But that's really messy, and painful to boot, espescially if it's not done right because they keep running around. Not good. You could shoot them all, painful as hell, and uses a lot of ammo, and you'd need you own team of snipers for a bigger abatoir. Plus gun shot wounds are hard to explain at the grocery store. You could drop them off something high. But that would bruise them, amongst other wounds, and that's not good for the bottom line.. So I can't really think of anyother way to kill large amounts of small creatures. Sure electrocution is not the best way to do it, but I guess we just have to hope that some creative person can think of a way. Until that time, I think that the most cost/humanity ratio would have to be electrocution.

    2. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by SamBC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure electrocution is not the best way to do it, but I guess we just have to hope that some creative person can think of a way.

      Just to point out - the electric shock does not kill them, merely hurt like hell and stun them so the corpse doesn't keep moving.

      The chickens aren't really alive after beheading, when they run around, just certain bits of muscle and nervous system keep going on inertia. The chicken no longer perceives pain. The only reason not to behead without the shock is to make the execution easier and thus cheaper.

    3. Re:Very nice, humane, but... by droleary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you were (or indeed are) in a country/state with the death penalty, would you rather be hung, gassed, put in the electric chair, or killed by lethal injection? Tip: one is far less painful than the others.

      Tip: Chickens are not people. Bonus tip: Dead is dead. Even if you believe in an afterlife, are you going to sit and dwell for eternity about how that last couple seconds/minutes of your life passed?

      In just the same way, there is no good reason to cause an animal more pain than necessary when slaughtering it for food.

      Of course there is! Humane too often means "in a way that makes humans feel good". How about we kill them in a way that makes the animal feel better, or at least gives them a chance to live another day? I think it is far better to have the chicken killed in a survival-of-the-fittest manner. Realistically, I actually expect animals would/should be killed in a manner that makes their meat most tasty and tender.

  5. McDonald's by MrCocktail · · Score: 5, Funny

    McDonald's Corp. is encouraging its chicken suppliers to mechanically collect at least half the birds it buys by year's end.

    McDonald's actually uses real chicken?

    1. Re:McDonald's by squidfood · · Score: 4, Informative
      The other 49% is fish. Cod, probably.

      Nope.. (And the McFish is invariable pollock).

    2. Re:McDonald's by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But the McNuggets do contain:
      dimethylpolysiloxane
      sodium acid pyrophosphate
      sodium aluminum phosphate
      monocalcium phosphate

      whatever those are!

    3. Re:McDonald's by jd_esguerra · · Score: 2, Funny

      But the McNuggets do contain:
      dimethylpolysiloxane
      sodium acid pyrophosphate
      sodium aluminum phosphate
      monocalcium phosphate


      Oh, thank god! I was afraid I wasn't getting enough dimethylpolysiloxane in my normal diet. So a 9-piece a day and I should stop foaming, right?

  6. in the long term..... by maliabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    will chicken eventually learn to avoid the machine after a while?

    1. Re:in the long term..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to be the one that breaks this to you, but the chikens are only picked up once.

    2. Re:in the long term..... by kaltkalt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aside from the fact that these are incredibly dumb animals, they have no reason to learn to avoid the machine. First time they experience it, they get sucked in and end up on my plate.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  7. Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Chickenator Three: Rise of the Machines!

    Looks like a cross between an EE grad student's robotics project and something out of the Transformers.

    Hook up a flamethrower to it, and we've got a mobile autonomous BBQ station. Where's Mark Pauline and Survival Research Labs when we need 'em? Bring on the Chickenators!

  8. Sure... by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    McDonald's actually uses real chicken?

    For the McRib!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. quoteness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mr. Tweedy: What is it?
    Mrs. Tweedy: It's a pie machine, you idiot. Chickens go in, pies come out.
    Mr. Tweedy: Ooh, what kind of pies?
    Mrs. Tweedy: Apple.
    Mr. Tweedy: My favorite.
    Mrs. Tweedy: Chicken pies, you great lummox!

  10. Seriously by DavidBrown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is more of a "News for Farmers, Stuff that Moos" story. But from a technological viewpoint, it's an interesting story. I for one didn't realize that chickens bred for meat were actually allowed to run free (albeit in a darkened warehouse). It's actually more "humane" than I had thought.

    But this isn't really an advance in treating chickens more humanely. The farmers profit because of 1) reduced labor costs; 2) reduced worker's comp claims; and 3) reduced "breakage" allowing them to send more chickens to market. I can see why animal rights groups would be supportive of this technology, but it's really only a change on the level of replacing the axe-man with the guillotine.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:Seriously by eht · · Score: 2, Funny

      because there isn't much of a back page

      it could be dumped to section, but almost no one reads those unless you have the collapse section option turned on which makes everything front page

    2. Re:Seriously by secolactico · · Score: 2, Funny

      i Seriously don't see how this made the front page

      I guess we could use a "farmhands.slashdot.org"

      --
      No sig
  11. New .sig for me! by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Funny
    "We support using machines that reduce the panic, fear and horror of chickens,"

    Horror of chickens... I like that.

    -T

  12. O/T: Duck Hearding by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Several years ago, I visited Oxford university on an open day. One of the students was developing an electric sheep-dog as a final year project. Since they did not have a ready supply of sheep, they were testing it by making it round up ducks. I can't help feeling that these two projects might be related...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  13. reminds me of Baraka by Tancred · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else seen Baraka?

    Among other glorious and terrible images, there are shots from a chicken processing plant. It shows thousands of chicks tumbling off a conveyor belt, swirling down a giant metal funnel and having their beaks burned.

  14. Re:Bawk? Are you Jhn Clux0r? by DavidBrown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please don't refer to it as the "Chickenator". The technical term you should be using is the "Chicken Zamboni".

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  15. Already got that by CausticWindow · · Score: 4, Funny

    My appartment is about 1800 cubic feet.

    There are exactly zero chikens in my appartment.

    So: chiken density = 0 / 1800 = 0 = chicken vacuum

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Already got that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmmm, one might almost suspect that, for a given volume, the density of live chickens is quantized...

    2. Re:Already got that by CausticWindow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Any bigger than that and I would have to work hard keeping the chickens out.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  16. Chicken Run by EngMedic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oblig. Chicken Run quote:
    "chickens go in...pies come out!"

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  17. Moo... by Chagatai · · Score: 2, Informative
    I work in the food service industry, particularly in the area which makes steak and pork. This device is nothing compared to some of the nightmare fuel machines that are in our plants. To give you guys a good idea, check out the Semi-automatic Neck Breaker (this is designed for poultry, not for cows or hogs, though). Just remember to thank the people who put the food on your table sometimes. And check out the rest of that site for more H. R. Geiger-borne instruments of fun.

    --
    --Chag
  18. as someone who has caught chickens for vaccination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    as a job in my teens:

    1. It is probably one of the worst jobs in North America. It stinks like ammonia all day in the barn, it's hot, hard to breathe, and they leave the lights off to calm the birds. (picture rolling yourself up in a thick blanket that 30 people have urinated on, and stay in their all day with the heat cranked up in the house). When you get home from work, you have to strip naked before you go in your home, and hose off in the yard, or the smell gets everywhere. (I took to burning clothes at one point outside.)

    2. Unfourtunately, I can't possibly see this machine keeping up with a human. When yo get good at it, you can catch and hold 6 birds at a time. And, regardless of what the article says, it's very easy to catch a chicken in a dark barn with practice. It's just hard work.

    Basically, I can't see this replacing cheap student labour. Just my two cents.

  19. what if tolkien... by QEDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    The chicken, sunlight coruscating off its radiant yellow-white coat of feathers, approached the dark, sullen asphalt road and scrutinized it intently with its obsidian-black eyes. Every detail of the thoroughfare leapt into blinding focus: the rough texture of the surface, over which countless tires had worked their relentless tread through the ages; the innumerable fragments of stone embedded within the lugubrious mass, perhaps quarried from the great pits where the Sons of Man labored not far from here; the dull black asphalt itself, exuding those waves of heat which distort the sight and bring weakness to the body; the other attributes of the great highway too numerous to give name. And then it crossed it.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:what if tolkien... by janda · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, this is just a wee-bit off-topic, but...

      It's already been done. Check out "Watership Down".

      --
      Karma: Food Fight (Mostly affected by Date Plate).
  20. Permaculture Chickens and Cows by spun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read recently about an experiment in permaculture, which is the science of making food production ecologically sustainable. The Chinese have been making an art of it for thousands of years, with complicated interlocking cultivation systems, where the waste from one part is always recycled in some other part.

    In this system, chickens were kept in small flocks in 20x20 foot covered cages. The cages were on wheels. Small herds of cows were also kept, in constant rotation among many small pastures. After the cows were done in one pasture, the chicken cages were rolled in. The chickens broke the cow patties apart looking for bugs, which were plentiful. This allowed the cow manure to break down faster, resulting in quicker regrowth of the grass, as well as lower rates of disease among the cows. The chickens were healthier as well, and got to run about and hunt for bugs, which if I were a chicken, I would vastly prefer to living in some overcrowded factory. Overall, the production of both beef and chicken increased dramatically over other organic ranching methods, putting it on a par with non-organic methods.

    The inventor of the system based the idea off of the fact that in nature, herds of wild ungulates are always followed by flocks of birds. Pretty clever, eh? Another thing: you don't need a robot chicken catcher, you just wheel the cage up to the slaughterhouse and pull the chickens in with a net.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Chinese have been making an art of it for thousands of years, with complicated interlocking cultivation systems, where the waste from one part is always recycled in some other part.
      This is currently illegal in the United States, because doing this promotes the lifecycle of certain parasites.
    2. Re:Permaculture Chickens and Cows by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better yet, combine your two ideas. Robot cows could automatically follow the cages, and a computerized system of pastures would keep the gates circulating, violin, you have a scale that systems very well.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  21. Version for humans by Animats · · Score: 4, Funny
    The large version, for riot control, will be really something.

    "The scoops are on the way!" - Soylent Green.

  22. Chicken Run! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't want to be a pie. I don't like gravy.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  23. Re:Build a better chicken trap... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally! A technological advancement in processing animals that doesn't have the PETA people crying fowl... heh... heh...

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  24. I've done it by fava · · Score: 5, Informative

    I did chicken catching once when visiting relatives out in the country. I must say that chickens are very stupid.

    Imagine a large barn with chickens covering the entire floor. As chickens are removed from the barn the remaining chickens do NOT move into the empty space, they remain packed together as the barn empties. There is no chasing involved.

    The chickens do not react at all until you grab them by the legs, the most common reaction is to peck, scratch or shit on your hands. And it stank.

    I do remember that I was paid well (for a 13 year old) for a few hours work and the farmers wife had a very nice breakfast ready for us when we were done.

    I certanly wouldn't want to do it for a living.

  25. Link whoring by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

    mfg website (uses frames - scroll top frame down for selections)
    bigger picture
    specifications page

    my sig:

  26. Can't resist... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never thought about a "chicken vacuum" before?

    Must...not...make..."suck"..."cock"...jokes...

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  27. Once again, another of my 1337 job skillz hosed! by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1!11!! I've DONE this job, lots, catching chickens in the dark and putting them in cages. It's one of the "fowl"er jobs out there. If at all possible, it's scheduled on new moon nights,or as close as possible, as dark as possible. On one farm where I worked doing this (back early 70's,pure fox platinum blonde farmers daughter, weekend job, etc, you know how it is....), we'd even ride up in the front end loader and put a hood over the public street light on the road out front, to further make it darker. The darker it is, the less they freak out. Next, the farmer, who was a closet alky and hid bottles from his old lady all over the farm, would give all us young fool morons dragooned into this cluck burger transportation service multiple shots of his wild turkey. Thus fortified, we are off! You slide into the chicken house, bend over, feel along the floor, find a chicken leg and snatch it, holding it with one finger, you find another, and another, three in each hand finally, for a total of 6. Then you trudge outside to the truck, load these now non-sleepy bundles of flapping indignation into wooden cages, then someone else would stack the cages. Back and forth and forth and back, on into the wee hours. This was BUHZILLIONS of chickens per chicken house, usually over 20,000 or so. That farm was slightly different from the story, these were egg layers going to the battery cages, before that, free ranging in open houses. Same deal though, ya gots to get cackleberry squatter from point A to B. Each chicken ran around 6-7 lbs. Do the math by the end of the night of what you probably carried in livestock tonnage, maybe 4 or 5 guys doing it.

    I think I made a whopper 2 clams an hour back then. If it wasn't for that girl, well, I just don't know how long I would have done that job...

  28. What ever happened to KISS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a contraption, a $200K contraption.

    Why not just scoop out the building? Some simple chicken wire like "bull dozer" that starts at one end of the building and slowly nudges all in its path towards the business end.

    After all, this thing just nudges them along.

    Some simple machinery (way less than $200K worth) along 2 sides of the barn, a 6' "plow" between the two, and a hole at one end. As an X' by Y' barn slowly becomes 0 by 0, chickens emerge.

    I mean, hell, if your going to put God damned EVERYBODY out of work you should at least do it as cheaply as you can.

    Patent pending.

  29. Re:I Modded Down 5 European Posts by cyril3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think we read this stuff for comment by the elite levels of the US corporate and academic sector. In Europe and Australia /. is preloaded in the Opera hotlist under Humour.

  30. Chicken Matrix by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Funny

    What else needs to be done to make chickens into batteries?

  31. Here's a movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    On this page is a movie from a competing system, using rubber fingers.
    Bas

  32. Ugh. by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's nice to see technology being applied to making the food industry more humane. However, I must use this opportunity to bitch about the quality of meat in the US. The poultry here, at least the stuff you buy at Giant or Safeway, sucks. Totally bland and tasteless. My family lived in Bangladesh until I was 4 or so. There, it takes six months to get a chicken ready for sale. Here, thanks to all the growth hormones, it takes a few weeks. In the process, the chicken is robbed of all flavor. When we moved here, it took me months to get used to the chicken here. Even now, the only way I can stand it is to cook it in tons of spices or deep fry it in grease.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  33. Asounding Improvement! by utahjazz · · Score: 4, Funny

    A five-man crew using a mechanical harvester can do the work of eight men

    My god, it's like something out of science fiction.

    1. Re:Asounding Improvement! by dfries · · Score: 2, Informative
      Two years with the mechanical catcher system, (2 year, 16 per your, 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year, 5 works, 200,000 for the machine)
      2*16*40*52*5+200000=$532,800
      two years for 8 workers
      2*16*40*52*8=$532,480

      After two years the owners reduce their costs by,
      16*40*52*3 = $99,840 / year

      What chicken farm owner wouldn't go for it?

    2. Re:Asounding Improvement! by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, I believe that's what Dave Bowman said when he encountered the monolith floating out there around Jupiter:

      "My God, it's full of chickens"

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  34. Link to product by SparkyTWP · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those interested, here's a link to the product page, with a handy dandy video of it in action.

  35. Chicken maturity matters? by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That line about the chickens being basically babies in adult bodies gave me pause, though -- I am a confirmed carnivore, but some of the stuff we do in the name of taste and profit is hard to digest.
    Eggs are essentially the most-immature form of chickens. Pot pies, chicken franks and such are, IIRC, made from old laying hens: the most mature chickens in commercial farming. Broilers are in the middle. I suspect that you've eaten all of the above.

    Is there anything about broilers (the 8-week wonders) being so young that makes them more pitiful than the other ends of the spectrum? All they are is a population which has been bred (selected) for certain traits; I doubt very much that they feel any more discomfort in their lives than laying hens, and probably less.

    1. Re:Chicken maturity matters? by petsounds · · Score: 3, Funny

      All they are is a population which has been bred (selected) for certain traits; I doubt very much that they feel any more discomfort in their lives than laying hens, and probably less.

      Thanks for the insight, Agent Smith.

  36. interesting facts on Kobe beef[OT] by Achoi77 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Apparently Kobe beef isn't the best Japan's got. One of my friends went to Japan this past winter, and scored himself a $600 steak - for free (but that's another story). Anyways, he asked the chef if this was Kobe beef, and the chef gave him a funny look, "Kobe beef!? That's nothing comapared to this!"

    Apparently there is all kinds of high quality beef in Japan prohibited from exporting, something about protecting its domestic beef industry. The restaurant buys the entire cow live, and they do all the work in-house. Everything of the cow is used - the menus are made out of the leather of their previous purchases, the bones are used for soup. Those wacky japanese love their stuff fresh..

  37. Gladiator by maudite · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love chicken catching. The only way to do it with finesse is to dress up like gladiator. I hold a net with one hand and a frog gig with the other. I pretend the frog gig is my trident. I usually have a mp3 cd with nothing but canned crowd yells and Conan music. Talk about a rush!

  38. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by renehollan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've tried raw steak, and unfortunately it tastes pretty much like it smells - not too enticing. So to be enjoyable, that stuff must be dramatically different.

    Mmmmm, steak tartare. Mmmmm.

    Scrape filet mignon fine, with a sharp blade, add a raw egg (you can skip this, but the scraping leaves the fat on the back of the blade, and some find the resulting meat a bit dry -- the danger of raw eggs is duly noted), some fresh ground black pepper, shallots (just a hint), and smear thickly on freshly baked Cuban bread, like 1/4 to 1/2 inch thick.

    Mmmmm.

    Of course, you'd damn well better trust your butcher. Beef is one of the few meats that are generally safe to eat raw: about the only thing it hosts is penicillin. However, if fouled from the contents of the entrails (E. Coli), or comes from a cow infected with Mad Cow disease (transmitted via the spinal cord and brain), it can be dangerous. In the simple case of surface fouling, of meat from an otherwise disease-free cow, a quick searing will do the trick. This is why rare steaks (from a reputable source) are perfectly safe to eat, but rare hamburger is not.

    Now, in the case of steak tartar, the meat has to be free of contamination from the start, and shredded with clean knives, hence the need to trust your butcher.

    --
    You could've hired me.
  39. more info at the manufacturers site by robdeadtech · · Score: 2, Informative

    more info at the lewismola site. http://www.lewismola.com/

    Also from the site....
    "The PH2000 is powered by a 4-stroke Kubota 3300-TE. This engine has twice as much horsepower as any mechanical harvester on the market. This extra power significantly reduces engine strain which results in greatly extended machine life. Due to its combination of the Kubota 3300-TE along with high quality hydraulic, electronic and belt systems, the PH2000 has proven to have unparalleled 'on the job ...day in & day out' reliability."

    and a detailed pic here..
    http://www.lewismola.com/lmfrmspecphoto.ht ml

    --
    Heil Sig! -Rob
  40. Re:as someone who has caught chickens for vaccinat by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Funny
    Basically, I can't see this replacing cheap student labour. Just my two cents.

    Just two cents? Student labor is cheaper than I thought....

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  41. Re:Kobe (koh-bee) by mskfisher · · Score: 2, Interesting
    However, if fouled from the contents of the entrails (E. Coli), or comes from a cow infected with Mad Cow disease (transmitted via the spinal cord and brain), it can be dangerous.

    Yeah. Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. One of the creepier diseases out there.
    And the infectious agent is impervious to normal cooking methods.

    I interned at a gelatine processing plant a few years ago. They didn't have anything for me to do for my first few days, so they gave me a book to read that had some bearing on the industry (I think it was this one, but I can't recall for sure). It detailed BSE and it's human equivalent, Creutzfeldt-Jakob
    Disease.
    Wow. It's the stuff of nightmares - you lose your mind slowly, there's no known treatment, it can't be easily detected, the prions (damaged proteins that are the carriers) are indestructible, etc... No wonder the US cut off imports from Canada when a single infected cow was discovered in Canada.

    Worst part, CJD can have an "incubation" period of years.

    When they actually find a treatment for the disease, I'll be quite fascinated to know how it works.
    --
    0x0D 0x0A
  42. Re:Not very humane by Catnapster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What PETA seems to realize - and you don't - is that no matter how zealous they are, there's not going to be a widespread ban on animal food anytime soon, and chickens will continue to be "inhumanely kept and slaughtered".

    Activists like to make you think that the act of buying one brand of chicken over another is a strike against the huge, faceless, cruel chicken industry and its sadistic practices. It's not. They won't even know it happened, because the store already bought the chicken.

    Furthermore, it's "almighty buck". And what you imply to be obsession with profit is actually just being efficient with money. If you have two gas stations to patronize, and one is clean, has efficient service, high-quality gas and a lower price, and the other is expensive and has crap gas, are you going to go to the better, less-expensive one or the other?

    --
    The world can be wrong today for once.
  43. Chicken Fluffer by repetty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, the correct term is chicken "fluffer".

  44. Chicken Hypnosis by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Berry tried everything to force the birds to move under their own power. He flashed strobe lights in their eyes...

    Anybody else get the feeling he also tried a pendulum, but won't admit it?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  45. Re:pathetic by Thing+1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're very funny. Let me directly quote the great-grandparent which you wrote:

    Peta should be advocating the fact that animals are sentient beings, not a renewable resource. And for those pathetic scientists who even created such a device should deserve death at the least, using their own stupid machines.

    Where did you use the "=" sign there? You said scientists who create a technology should be put to death "at the least" (I'm wondering what your "most" would be...). You did not say the users of the machines should be put to death, you said the creators. That's like suing Ford for a drunk driver killing your relative. (Pssst... it's not equal.)

    I didn't insult your education, call you a fool, or discuss your drug use or lack thereof. I merely said you were being hypocritical, and you didn't answer my question: do you eat vegetables for which you must kill the organism in order to produce the food? (Carrots, potatoes, beets?)

    Unlike animals, if an apple is broken off the tree, first, it doesn't feel pain (no nervous system) and second, it can REGROW the apple i.e. regenerate.

    But carrots, potatoes and beets cannot regenerate; you kill them by harvesting them.

    And just because a plant doesn't have a nervous system doesn't mean that you're not removing a life force from the Earth when you kill plants. They have a Kirlian aura which you're snuffing out. And check out PEVA, who argue that plants and even single-celled organisms can feel pain ("Some single cell organisms are known to react and withdraw (run!) from heat. Is this not a single-cell pain reaction without a complex human-like nervous system? How can a single cell make this determination without having a 'brain'?")

    Oh, and as for religious references? Let's take Genesis:

    "26": And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

    Now, from Dictionary.com, dominion is:

    1. Sovereign or supreme authority; the power of governing and controlling; independent right of possession, use, and control; sovereignty; supremacy.

    Combining the two: God gave us supremacy over the animals. The power to govern, control, possess, and use them for our purposes.

    And if you follow a more scientific track, we evolved as omnivores and the few people who I have seen attempt a vegan lifestyle ended up emaciated, weak, pale, and short. (Yes, this is anecdotal evidence.)

    I'm not trying to pick a fight -- but you obviously are, given the wording in the great-grandparent post:

    Go ahead, FLAME ME. But it's the truth.
    Calling something the truth without providing references is a Fallacious Argument. There's lots on that page; take your pick. ;-) (My vote is for Burden of Proof, but several others fit.) Now, if you're willing to provide references, as I have above, and not resort to name-calling (that's an Ad Hominem attack, by the way) then we can have a discussion.
    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  46. Chickens are people, damn you! by Wynken+de+Word · · Score: 4, Funny

    The scoops are coming!

    I missed the 'e' in 'humane' from this line in the article:

    "Starting in the early 1980s, Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine."

  47. chicken cannon / dethaw by lingqi · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was told by an aquaintance who worked at a major airplane engine manufacture stories about this. (note to everyone - Boeing actually DOES NOT MAKE ENGINES - so it would be quite silly if they did compliance and validations on the engines as much as engine manufactures, no?)

    Anyhoo - apparently the method of the "chicken cannon" uses anything from a quail to a small turkey. They bird is stuck in a ball-like styrofoam shell, and when the entire apparatus leaves the cannon, the shell disintegrates, and the dead bird flies toward the intake of a full-power jet engine at maybe 3-500 mph.

    The thing is, though - unless you have some REALLY big birds, they (dethawed) don't do any damage to the engine at all. The highspeed photograph would show in one frame the chicken flying toward the blades, and the next frame the head is chopped off, and the next part of the neck, one after the tip of the chest, etc. Apparently the blades are going so fast that the chicken's inertia alone will let it "float" while being chopped up and spit out through the back.

    The humorous part is when they lent the chicken-cannon to france rail companies to test their high-speed trains. Apparently when the french set up the cannon and fired the small turkey toward the front-windshield, giddy with anticipation of everything going well, the bird went through the widshield, punched a hole in the dummy sitting in the operator's seat, went through the wall behind the dummy operator, and landed about halfway down the train car after causing quite some havoc within it. Everyone was scratching there heads with jaws to the ground (obviously you would not want to drive this thing if it will leave you a turkey-sized entry+exit-wound). Eventually it turned out that it was because they only (!) thawed the bird for 6 hours or something... When they did it with a proper bird it damaged the wind(bird)shield but the driver remained intact.

    moral of the story? you can hear some interesting stuff from aerospace industry engineers.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  48. Easier way to catch chickens by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A former neighbour told me this trick...

    He used a small ball of twine, which he would coat with suet and toss into the chicken pen. One of the chickens would inevitably swallow the twine, and pass it after a few days. He would then collect roll the remaining twine back into a ball, add some more suet and toss it back to the chickens. Another chicken would soon swallow the suet covered ball, which was still attached to the first chicken. After a week or so you have a whole chain of connected chickens on a rope following each other around head to tail. Makes them real easy to catch!

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  49. Ethernet cows? by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's a snap to coax barnyard animals like pigs and cattle..."

    Anyone else read that the way I did? :)

  50. A what? by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Britain's Silsoe Research Institute received about $200,000 a year from the government to design a humane harvesting machine

    Anyone else read that as "human harvesting machine"?

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  51. Crazy Killing Tools For Sale by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, so the subject is a bit misleading...thesen't aren't all killing tools but they're pretty crazy. It's worth a karma troll anyway. :)

    Spinal Cord Remover

    De-Horner

    Bung Ring Expander (!!!!)

    The Stun Box

    Bung Droppers (Removes 1200 assholes an hour, no shit.)

    Head Cutter

    The Lung Gun (i don't want to know)

    "Electrical Stimulation" (somehow, i think it does more than stimulate them...)